procurement and contracting services. robert schur, j.d., directorfrank krappes, associate director...
TRANSCRIPT
Professional Development
Institute 2009
Procurement and Contracting Services
Robert Schur, J.D., Director • Administrative Assistants : • Sue Butler and Frances Maizland
Frank Krappes, Associate Director • Farrah Bustamante• Bob Hendon• Kathi LaFollette
Construction Contracts Manager, Carol Guy• Linda Meserve• Stan Oakland• Rick Tensley
Procurement Contracts Manager, Elizabeth Kelly, J.D.• John Swaro, Program Administrator • Patty Cashen, SciQuest Help Desk • Lu Ann Herin, Administrative Assistant, ACard
Purchasing Agents-Academic Team:
Purchasing Agents-Administrative Team
SciQuest and ACard:
Staff
Procurement Rules Update
Presented by Bob Schur, J.D.
CSU opted out of State of Colorado Procurement Code Effective January 1, 2008
What does this mean for CSU? Dollar thresholds for solicitations remain the same Protests are now handled internally by CSU Can participate in Group Purchasing Organizations (GPO’s)
E & I, US Communities, National IPA etc. At the discretion of the Procurement office
The use of Colorado Correctional Industries for office furniture remains mandated by State Statute
Fiscal Rule requirements are not affected by opt out View the Colorado State Procurement Code and State Fiscal
Rules at: http://www.purchasing.colostate.edu/pages/manuals.asp
Procurement Rules Update
Fiscal Rules UpdatePresented by Bob Schur, J.D.and Elizabeth Kelly, J.D.
Fiscal Rules Update
Effective January 1, 2009
Fiscal Rule 2-2 Commitment Vouchers
Fiscal Rule 3-1 State Contracts
Related Policies
Definition: A State approved form Purchase order Contract Travel Authorization
Exclusion: Procurement card (ACARD) Most CSU cards have a $3K limit with some up to $5K Commitment Voucher may be used, but is not required for
purchases of $5K or less Supporting documentation may include invoice, receipt or other
appropriate document Unauthorized Purchases
Failure of a person or department to have an approved commitment voucher prior to the purchase of goods or services = Statutory Violation Unauthorized Purchase Process
Fiscal Rule 2-2:Commitment Vouchers
New FR to comply with the Centralized Contract Management System, Personal Services Contracts >$100,000 must include:
Performance measures and standards (objective test) Vendor accountability standards specified in the contract; can withhold payment until successful completion /achievement of performance standards. Monitoring requirements to measure both CSU and vendor performance (monitoring must be done by designated
contract monitor) Processes to resolve situations in which CSU determines noncompliance, including termination of the contract
State Contracts
Intergovernmental Agreements may “go silent” on choice of governing law without legal approval
All other changes to Special Provisions still require legal approval (and usually OSC waiver)
Specific prohibition on indemnity by CSU Monitoring of State Contracts for Personal
Services (Sponsored Projects are exempt)
State Contracts
Review and Approval – Institutions Of Higher Education with Delegation
Sponsored ProjectsStatutory violations/ late contracts
Vendor Agreements
State Controller Policies
Senate Bill 07-228Presented by Frank Krappes and Farrah Bustamante
Legislation that requires formation of Centralized Contract Management System Personal services contracts in excess of $100,000 Construction contracts in excess of $500,000 Centralized Contract Management System will be
available to the public via a website maintained by the state
Some sections already in effect; CMS effective date is June 30, 2009
Establishes policy of fair and open competition, mechanisms for monitoring, evaluating and reporting contractor performance and location of contract performance
SENATE BILL 07-228
Sole Source Contracts for Personal Services: All must be posted on the BIDS system
Minimum of three (3) business days If other acceptable contractors are identified, a
competitive solicitation must be issued All sole source contracts for personal services will be
reported annually to the Legislative Council of the General Assembly The justification provided in support of the sole source
and all steps taken in the determination of the sole source will be included in the report
SENATE BILL 07-228
Monitoring Contractor Performance: Requires performance measures and standards
developed specifically for the contract Performance measures and standards must be negotiated
with the contractor prior to contract execution Specifies how CSU and contractor will evaluate each
others’ performance, including: Progress reports Site visits Inspections Review of performance data
Monitoring ensures the results, objectives and obligations of the contract are met
SENATE BILL 07-228
Contractor Evaluation and Reporting: Evaluating personal services contracts
A standardized form to be completed by the Designated Contract Monitor, including the following: Name of the Designated Contract Monitor completing the evaluation form Numerical rating relating to quality Numerical rating relating to cost Numerical rating relating to deadlines
Evaluating construction contracts A standardized form to be completed by the Designated Contract
Monitor, including the following: Name of the Designated Contract Monitor completing the evaluation form Initial amount budgeted in the contract vs. the actual amount paid Completion date specified in the contract vs. the actual completion date Numerical rating that assesses the overall qualitative performance Numerical rating that assesses the overall safety performance
SENATE BILL 07-228
Contractor Evaluation and Reporting: (continued) Evaluation submitted to contactor for review and
comment in response to the rating Contractor has dispute rights concerning the
evaluation Evaluation and any response from the contractor
is submitted centrally at CSU for recording to the Centralized Contract Management System database
The evaluation must be made public via website Within thirty days after completion of the contract
SENATE BILL 07-228
Location of Contract Performance: Prior to contract execution, the contractor must
disclose where the work will be performed, including any subcontracts
If any of the work is to be performed outside of the State of Colorado or the United States, including subcontracts Contractor must provide a statement setting forth
why it is necessary or advantageous to go outside of Colorado or the U.S. to perform the work
SENATE BILL 07-228
SENATE BILL 07-228 SUMMARY
Formation of Publicly Accessible Centralized Contract Management System Personal services contracts in excess of $100,000 Construction contracts in excess of $500,000
June 30, 2009 Effective Date All Sole Sources must be posted on BIDS
Minimum of three (3) business days Competitive solicitation must be done if other vendors are identified
Specifics on how CSU and Contractor will evaluate each other’s performance Standardized form to evaluate Personal Services contracts
Four (4) items to complete evaluation Standardized form to evaluate Construction contracts
Five (5) items to complete evaluation Evaluation submitted to contractor for review
Contractor has dispute rights Evaluation and Contractor comments submitted to CSU for input into Centralized
Contract Management System Must be posted within 30 days
Prior to contract execution, contractor must disclose where work will be performed If any work to be performed outside Colorado or United States, vendor must provide statement
indicating why it is advantageous to have the work performed outside Colorado or the country Including subcontractors
Environmentally Preferable
PurchasingPresented by Farrah Bustamante and Stan Oakland
A.K.A “green” purchasing What is environmentally preferable?
“Products or services that have a lesser or reduced effect on human health and the environment when compared with competing products or services that serve the same purpose.”
CSU Purchasing Power of $250M+ We can make a big impact with everyday purchases
CRS 24-103-207.5: Can apply up to a 5% preference for “green” or
environmentally friendly products Preference may exceed 5%
If cost of ownership life cycle analysis establishes long term savings
Environmentally Preferable Purchasing (EPP)
What is greenwashing? When a company or organization spends more time and money claiming to be “green”
through advertising and marketing than actually implementing business practices that minimize environmental impact.
What can you do on campus to be “green”? Look for “Eco-labels” or Certifications
Energy Star, Forest Stewardship Council, EPEAT, GreenSeal etc. Use office paper with a minimum 30% PCW
CSU uses approx. 278,352 pounds of paper per year 77.5 % (or about 215,641 pounds) of the paper has NO recycled content Want to know how our paper choices impact the environment?
Paper Calculator shows the environmental impacts of different papers (virgin vs. various PCW) across their full lifecycle
http://www.edf.org/papercalculator/ Use flat screen monitors Set office copier to “sleep” when not in use
Saves up to 40% on energy costs Require all office copiers/printers duplex Buy Energy Star or EPEAT rated electronics Use computer/electronics exchange programs
Dell Disposal Service, HP Trade-In Program, Apple Recycling Program Use “green” cleaning products And a lot more……
Environmentally Preferable Purchasing
What are some other ways to be green? Planet Partners Program
Toner/ink cartridge recycling program directly with HP Ensures cartridges do not end up in landfill
Will allow CSU to receive over $50K worth of Energy Star compliant printers/copiers For more information visit:
http://www.purchasing.colostate.edu/pages/planet_partners.asp
Revised delivery schedules for high volume vendors MWF deliveries for toner/ink cartridges and office
supplies Green products are indicated on SciQuest Plan ahead and consolidate purchases
Environmentally Preferable Purchasing
Maximizing the Value from your Solicitation
Presented by Procurement and Contracting Services Staff
How can you maximize your solicitation? Get PCS involved at the onset of procurements which will
require source selection Planning/Funding Meetings Funding Review/Recommendation Boards/Committees
Plan ahead and try to consolidate your purchases Consult with Purchasing Agent to discuss best source
selection method (DQ, IFB, RFP, ISS) for your project Requisition
Dollar Thresholds Departmental Discretion
Up to $5K for goods or services Purchasing Agent discretion
Up to $10K for goods and $25k for services
Maximizing Your Solicitation
Maximizing Your Solicitation What are the differences between source
selection methods? Documented Quote
DQ Dollar thresholds
For goods $10,000 to $150,000
For Services $25,000 to $150,000
More flexible than other source selection method Generally, short turnaround time Minimum of three (3) business days Can evaluate on more than price Vendor negotiations
Differences between source selection methods (continued): Invitation for Bid
IFB For procurements over $150,000 for both goods and
services Not as flexible as DQ
Formal, sealed response Must be posted for at least 14 calendar days Evaluate responses on lowest price which meets objective
specifications only Cannot have lock out specifications (proprietary, patented, etc.)
Two Step Invitation for Bid Explanation
Maximizing Your Solicitation
Differences between source selection methods (continued): Request for Proposal
RFP Generally for procurements over $150,000 More complex than DQ or IFB’s
Formal, sealed response Must be posted for at least 30 calendar days Must have a committee of at least three (3) evaluators
Cannot include Purchasing Agent RFP process can take at least 90 days after posting Can evaluate on other criteria besides price
Objective and subjective criteria Cannot have lock out specifications (proprietary etc.)
Maximizing Your Solicitation
Q & A
Forms for Reporting SB228 Compliance Web-accessible database for all CSU
Contracts Implementation of a single Contract
Request Form in place of many standard contract forms
Small Business Supplier Showcase February 24, 2009
Will highlight Small, Minority and Disadvantaged Businesses
SQ/Kuali Integration
Coming Attractions