problem identification meeting (50% deliverable) february 10, 2009 aecom, inc. and a.d.a....

15
Problem Identification Meeting (50% Deliverable) February 10, 2009 AECOM, Inc. and A.D.A. Engineering, Inc.

Upload: britton-hood

Post on 18-Jan-2018

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Estero River South 25yr DS Water Surface Profile Three Oaks Corkscrew Rd Confluence w/ North Branch Sanctuary Rd I-75

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Problem Identification Meeting (50% Deliverable) February 10, 2009 AECOM, Inc. and A.D.A. Engineering, Inc

Problem Identification Meeting (50% Deliverable)

February 10, 2009

AECOM, Inc. and A.D.A. Engineering, Inc.

Page 2: Problem Identification Meeting (50% Deliverable) February 10, 2009 AECOM, Inc. and A.D.A. Engineering, Inc

Agenda• Review flood profiles• Review flows in the Brooks area• Summarize bridge overtopping and flooding• Peak stage and flow results• Flooding maps• What if we had 1995 rainfall today• Compare the SLCWP flows to 100-year simulation

results• Summarize problems and challenges

Page 3: Problem Identification Meeting (50% Deliverable) February 10, 2009 AECOM, Inc. and A.D.A. Engineering, Inc

Estero River South 25yr DS Water Surface Profile

0.0 1000.0 2000.0 3000.0 4000.0 5000.0 6000.0 7000.0 8000.0 9000.0 10000.0 11000.0 12000.0 13000.0[ft]

-6.0

-4.0

-2.0

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

[feet] 3-8-2006 15:01:00

ESTERORIVS 0 - 6299

099

401

531

1019

2175

3150

3900

4100

4300

4451

5042

5381

5512

5608

6200

6299

ESTERORIVS 6299 - 8858

6430

7150

8165

8629

8760

8858

ESTERORIVS 8858 - 1294090

83

9633

9744

9941

1003

0

1041

9

1089

4

1115

611

383

1204

0

1254

0

1294

0

Three Oaks Corkscrew Rd

Confluence w/ North Branch

Sanctuary RdI-75

Page 4: Problem Identification Meeting (50% Deliverable) February 10, 2009 AECOM, Inc. and A.D.A. Engineering, Inc

Estero River 25yr DS Water Surface Profile

0.0 2000.0 4000.0 6000.0 8000.0 10000.0 12000.0 14000.0 16000.0 18000.0 20000.0 22000.0[ft]

-14.0

-12.0

-10.0

-8.0

-6.0

-4.0

-2.0

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

22.0

[feet] 3-8-2006 17:01:00

ESTERORIV 23212 - 9544

9544

968699

9610

140

1048

910

499

1063

010

850

1143

9

1201

612

141

1237

9

1297

9

1397

9

1497

9

1587

91667

9

1757

91860

4

1962

9

2067

9

2160

422

049

2208

922

154

2223

922

589

2278

923

089

2321

2

ESTERORIV 9544 - 311

311

574

732

1562

1952

2067

21142426

3226

3944

4944

5577

5922

6053

6236

6693

6857

723181

719038

9350

Sandy Lane

Rivers Ford Bridge

Rookery Bridge

Three Oaks I-75

Page 5: Problem Identification Meeting (50% Deliverable) February 10, 2009 AECOM, Inc. and A.D.A. Engineering, Inc

Halfway Creek 25yr DS Water Surface Profile

0.0 2000.0 4000.0 6000.0 8000.0 10000.0 12000.0 14000.0 16000.0 18000.0 20000.0 22000.0 24000.0 26000.0 28000.0 30000.0[ft]

-6.0

-4.0

-2.0

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

[feet] 3-8-2006 17:01:00

HALFWAYCR 0 - 3937

0 900

1400

2953 36

0839

37

HALFWAYCR 3937 - 9354

4900

5906

6890

7500

8858

9354

1025

9105

0010

649

1070

011

000

1160

011

800

1190

012

170

HALFWAYCRDS 12170 - 31742

1260

0 1310

013

500

1533

915

878

1697

8

1807

8

1922

3

2051

8

2171

8

2276

8 2381

8

2496

8

2611

8

2716

8

2821

8

2936

8

3061

8

3125

831

742

Three Oaks RR Crossing

FPL Crossing

US 41

Via Villagio

Page 6: Problem Identification Meeting (50% Deliverable) February 10, 2009 AECOM, Inc. and A.D.A. Engineering, Inc

Spring Creek 25yr DS Water Surface Profile

0.0 2000.0 4000.0 6000.0 8000.0 10000.0 12000.0 14000.0 16000.0 18000.0 20000.0 22000.0 24000.0 26000.0 28000.0 30000.0 32000.0[ft]

-10.0

-8.0

-6.0

-4.0

-2.0

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

[feet] 3-8-2006 13:01:00

FAIRWAYESTATES 4855 - 10827

4855

4921

1075

010

827

SPRINGCRSS 200 - 5541

200

853

1140

1575

1673

2428

2657

4080

4429

5541

SPRINGCR 4944 - 9892

4944

5730

7010

7110

7230

7283

7431

9892

SPRINGCR 9892 - 17438

9930

1173

0

1488

0

1683

017

438

SPRINGCR 17438 - 25938

2085

0

2258

0

2433

0

2567

925

938

Fairway Estates Weir

Old US 41

Railroad

FPL Crossing

US 41

Page 7: Problem Identification Meeting (50% Deliverable) February 10, 2009 AECOM, Inc. and A.D.A. Engineering, Inc

Halfway Creek 10-Year Design Storm Flows Into the Brooks and Diversion Flows to the Estero River

15-7-2006 20-7-2006 25-7-2006 30-7-2006 4-8-2006 9-8-2006 14-8-2006 19-8-2006 24-8-2006 29-8-2006 3-9-2006 0.0

50.0

100.0

150.0

200.0

250.0

300.0

[ft^3/s]

11.0

11.5

12.0

12.5

13.0

13.5

14.0

[feet]Time Series DischargeHALFWAYUP 6300.00HALFWAYCRDS 10400.00

Water LevelHALFWAYCR 3937.01

15-7-2006 20-7-2006 25-7-2006 30-7-2006 4-8-2006 9-8-2006 14-8-2006 19-8-2006 24-8-2006 29-8-2006 3-9-2006 8-9-2006 13-9-2006

0.0

50.0

100.0

150.0

200.0

250.0

300.0

[ft^3/s] Time Series Discharge DischargeTHREEOAKS 650.00HALFWAYCRDS 10400.00

Page 8: Problem Identification Meeting (50% Deliverable) February 10, 2009 AECOM, Inc. and A.D.A. Engineering, Inc

Halfway Creek 10-year Design Storm Flows West of the Brooks

15-7-2006 25-7-2006 4-8-2006 14-8-2006 24-8-2006 3-9-2006 13-9-2006 23-9-2006

-50.0

0.0

50.0

100.0

150.0

200.0

250.0

300.0

[ft^3/s] Time Series Discharge DischargeHALFWAYCRDS 10400.00HALFWAY_S 7555.00

15-7-2006 25-7-2006 4-8-2006 14-8-2006 24-8-2006 3-9-2006 13-9-2006 23-9-2006 0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

120.0

140.0

160.0

180.0

200.0

[ft^3/s] Time Series Discharge DischargeHALFWAYCRDS 10674.50HALFWAY_S 7850.00

Page 9: Problem Identification Meeting (50% Deliverable) February 10, 2009 AECOM, Inc. and A.D.A. Engineering, Inc

Bridge Over-topping

Potential Flooding in the Brooks

Simulated Peak Stages, ft-NAVD Location Road

Deck 10-Year Elevation

25-Year Elevation

100-Year Elevation

North Branch Estero – Rivers Ford Road

12.7 14.0 14.8

Spring Creek, Strike Lane 14.5 15.2 15.8 16.7 Imperial Tributary at Pinecrest Lane

10.5 11.4

Simulated Peak Stages, ft-NAVD Location Structure

Elevation 10-Year Elevation

25-Year Elevation

100-Year Elevation

Brooks – minimum road 14.2 14.4 14.9 15.4 Brooks – minimum house 15.2 15.4

Page 10: Problem Identification Meeting (50% Deliverable) February 10, 2009 AECOM, Inc. and A.D.A. Engineering, Inc

Comparison of Stages from the 1999 Study to this Study

• The table below compares stages for 5-, 10-, 25-, and 100-year design storms for the 1999 and the 2009 South Lee County studies

• Differences are large for Halfway Creek at US 41, Spring Creek at Strike Lane, Srping Creek South at Old U.S. 41 (USGS gage), and the Imperial River at Matheson Street

5 10 25 100Estero River South Branch at I-75 0.3 -0.4 -0.5 -0.1ER SB Corkscrew Road, 1.7 2.0 2.0 1.7HC at US 41, 2.4 2.7 3.2 3.5 Spring Ck at Strike Lane, 3.1 2.2 1.7 2.4Spring Ck South at Old US 41 -3.8 -4.0 -3.9 -3.3Spring Ck @ FPL crossing 3.9 4.2 4.5 5.9Spring Ck at US 41.  0.8 1.1 1.3 2.0Kehl Canal at Bonita Grande Drive 0.3 0.6 0.2 0.0Imperial River at Matheson Street Bridge 3.3 4.0 3.6 3.1

DifferenceRiver

5 10 25 100 5 10 25 100Estero River South Branch at I-75 252.6 16.7 17.7 18.2 18.3 17.0 17.3 17.7 18.2ER SB Corkscrew Road, 8697.50656 9.5 10.4 12.2 13.1 11.2 12.4 14.2 14.8HC at US 41, 12870 12.8 12.8 12.8 13.0 15.2 15.5 16.0 16.5 Spring Ck at Strike Lane, 14107.6 13.0 14.3 15.5 15.6 16.1 16.5 17.1 18.0Spring Ck South at Old US 41 1637.139 10.1 10.6 11.4 11.7 6.3 6.6 7.4 8.4Spring Ck @ FPL crossing 3900 5.9 6.2 6.8 7.2 9.7 10.3 11.3 13.2Spring Ck at US 41.  7358.92 2.7 2.8 3.3 3.7 3.4 3.9 4.6 5.7Kehl Canal at Bonita Grande Drive 98.425 14.2 14.3 15.0 15.7 14.5 14.8 15.2 15.7Imperial River at Matheson Street Bridge 14291 4.7 4.7 6.2 7.7 8.0 8.7 9.8 10.8

River Chainage1999 SLC Flood Study 2009 SLC Update

Page 11: Problem Identification Meeting (50% Deliverable) February 10, 2009 AECOM, Inc. and A.D.A. Engineering, Inc

Comparison of Flows from the 1999 Study to this Study

• The table below compares flows for 5-, 10-, 25-, and 100-year design storms for the 1999 and the 2009 South Lee County studies

• Differences are large for Halfway Creek at US 41, Spring Creek at Strike Lane, Spring Creek South at Old U.S. 41 (USGS gage), and the Imperial River at Matheson Street

5 10 25 100 5 10 25 100Estero River South Branch at I-75 252.6 196 248 343 380 238 258 298 340ER SB Corkscrew Road, 8697.50656 196 243 340 378 289 361 422 547Halfway Ck at US 41, 12870 85 87 84 129 236 271 303 338 Spring Ck at Strike Lane, 14107.6 32 43 78 103 148 192 224 245Spring Ck South at Old US 41 1637.139 59 79 145 189 167 212 289 379SC @ FPL crossing 3900 160 217 400 520 80 99 127 139SC at US 41.  7358.92 160 217 400 520 315 406 609 976Kehl Canal at Bonita Grande Drive 98.425 782 830 1,205 1,641 959 1,100 1,405 1,765Imperial River at Matheson Street Bridge 14291 939 940 1,312 1,736 1,360 1,540 1,929 2,410

River Chainage1999 SLC Flood Study 2009 SLC Update

5 10 25 100 5 10 25 100Estero River South Branch at I-75 42 10 -45 -40 21% 4% -13% -11%ER SB Corkscrew Road, 93 118 82 169 48% 49% 24% 45%Halfway Ck at US 41, 151 184 219 209 178% 211% 260% 162% Spring Ck at Strike Lane, 116 149 146 142 361% 346% 187% 138%Spring Ck South at Old US 41 167 212 289 379 283% 268% 199% 200%SC @ FPL crossing -80 -118 -273 -381 -50% -54% -68% -73%SC at US 41.  155 189 209 456 97% 87% 52% 88%Kehl Canal at Bonita Grande Drive 177 270 200 124 23% 32% 17% 8%Imperial River at Matheson Street Bridge 421 600 617 674 45% 64% 47% 39%

Difference, %Difference, cfsRiver

Page 12: Problem Identification Meeting (50% Deliverable) February 10, 2009 AECOM, Inc. and A.D.A. Engineering, Inc

Inundation Maps

• Switch to ArcGIS

Page 13: Problem Identification Meeting (50% Deliverable) February 10, 2009 AECOM, Inc. and A.D.A. Engineering, Inc

Comparison of actual 1995 vs what would happen if we had 1995 rainfall today

Imperial River Flows - Spliced 1995 vs Measured 1995

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

1-Jul-06 31-Jul-06 30-Aug-06 29-Sep-06 29-Oct-06 28-Nov-06 28-Dec-06

cfs

Imp R Orr Sim Imp

Estero River South Flows - Spliced 1995 vs Measured 1995

-50

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

1-Jul-06 31-Jul-06 30-Aug-06 29-Sep-06 29-Oct-06 28-Nov-06 28-Dec-06

cfs

Estero S Sim ER_S

Spring Creek Flows - Spliced 1995 vs Measured 1995

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

1-Jul-06 31-Jul-06 30-Aug-06 29-Sep-06 29-Oct-06 28-Nov-06 28-Dec-06

cfs

Spring Ck Sim Spring

Estero River North Flows - Spliced 1995 vs Measured 1995

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

1-Jul-06 31-Jul-06 30-Aug-06 29-Sep-06 29-Oct-06 28-Nov-06 28-Dec-06

cfs

Estero N Sim ER N

Page 14: Problem Identification Meeting (50% Deliverable) February 10, 2009 AECOM, Inc. and A.D.A. Engineering, Inc

Brooks Agreement from 1999 SLCWP

• 2009 simulated 100-year peak flow for Halfway Creek at U.S. 41 is 340 cfs

• Brooks diversion simulated 100-year flow to the Estero River is 14 cfs, less than 10% of the planned diversion

• Peak stages in the Brooks will result in flooding of some buildings during the 100-year event, while peak flows into the Brooks under I-75 are 400 cfs, less than half of planned flows

• Flows to the South Branch of the Estero River are less than half of planned flows

p. 6 of Amendment 1

Page 15: Problem Identification Meeting (50% Deliverable) February 10, 2009 AECOM, Inc. and A.D.A. Engineering, Inc

Definition of Existing Problems

• Water levels appear to be higher than desired in the Brooks while predicted peak flows through the Brooks are less than one half of design levels

• Water levels appear to be very high in San Carlos Estates (see Spring Creek at Strike Lane), however modifications to the model files are being made to adjust this. Flooding of San Carlos Estates is expected to persist in spite of the model changes. This condition will have to be considered before any proposal to divert Halfway Creek flows through Spring Creek.

• Flows in the South Branch of the Estero River do not cause flooding problems

• Flows in the North Branch of the Estero River appear to result in road flooding in Country Creek Estates, however model instabilities may be the problem

• If rainfall conditions observed in 1995 occurred today, flows might be less than before, however model results files are still under review