principles of fraud examination...search operators search strings: • combine multiple operators to...
TRANSCRIPT
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc.
Principles of Fraud
Examination
Investigating on the Internet
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 2 of 27
Introduction
▪ The Internet is a powerful tool for fraud
examiners.
▪ Examiners should use the Internet in every
investigation.
▪ Awareness of resources and methods can
make investigations effective and efficient.
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 3 of 27
Putting the Information to Use
▪ Background investigations and due diligence
▪ Assessing the need for an investigation
▪ Planning the investigation
▪ Gathering evidence
▪ Preparing for and conducting interviews
▪ Prevention
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 4 of 27
Important Considerations for
Investigating on the Internet
▪ Planning resource allocation:
• Determine goals and scope early.
• Understand the impact of an assignment or
investigation.
• Conduct a cost/benefit analysis on paid Internet
tools or services.
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 5 of 27
Important Considerations for
Investigating on the Internet
▪ Legal issues:
• Laws governing access to information, including
credit records and health records
• Privacy laws and rights
• Defamation
• Discrimination in hiring
• Local laws
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 6 of 27
Important Considerations for
Investigating on the Internet
▪ Online identity:
• Pretexting and covert accounts:
• Site terms of service
• Invasion of privacy
• Recent warnings
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 7 of 27
Important Considerations for
Investigating on the Internet
▪ Online identity:
• Mask your IP:
• VPNs
• Tor
• Virtual operating systems
• Public Wi-Fi
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 8 of 27
Search Engines
▪ Best starting point:
• Bing
• Dogpile
• Country-specific search engines
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 9 of 27
Search Engines: Google
Settings
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 10 of 27
Search Engines: Google
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 11 of 27
Search Engines: Bing
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 12 of 27
Search Engines: Bing
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 13 of 27
Search Engines: Dogpile
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 14 of 27
Search Engines: Dogpile
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 15 of 27
Search Operators
▪ Quotation marks around a phrase or words
returns the exact phrase—“[search terms]”.
▪ AND—place between terms to make
searches more relevant and specific: [search
term] AND [search term].
▪ OR—place between terms to bring in more
potentially relevant results: [search term]
OR [search term].
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 16 of 27
Search Operators
▪ Parentheses—group search terms and
operators like a math equation for “search
strings” involving multiple operators:
(“[search terms]” OR “[search terms]”)
AND [search term].
▪ + Designates two words that must appear
together in either order—Mason+Wilder
returns results for pages listing Mason Wilder
or Wilder, Mason.
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 17 of 27
Search Operators
▪ Placing the minus sign (-) before a word
returns pages that do not contain that term—
fraud -Ponzi would return pages in which the
word fraud appears but excludes the word
Ponzi.
▪ Use additional operators such as filetype:,
site:, allintext.
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 18 of 27
Search Operators
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 19 of 27
Search Operators
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 20 of 27
Search Operators
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 21 of 27
Search Operators
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 22 of 27
Search Operators
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 23 of 27
Search Operators
▪ Search strings:
• Combine multiple operators to further narrow
results.
• It works like a math formula.
• Save search strings that work for you to plug and
play for subsequent investigations.
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 24 of 27
News Alerts
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 25 of 27
The Archived Web
▪ The Wayback Machine (www.archive.org):
• Saves previous versions of websites
• Organized by date
• Not comprehensive or exhaustive
▪ Google, Bing, and Archive.is also offer
resources for archived Web pages.
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 26 of 27
The Archived Web
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 27 of 27
The Archived Web
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 28 of 27
The Archived Web
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 29 of 27
People and Username Search Sites
▪ Search for a
subject’s Internet
presence using a
name, email,
phone, and
username.
• Spokeo
• BeenVerified
• Pipl
• Intelius
▪ Check availability
of usernames on
sites, potentially
identifying profiles.
• Knowem.com
• Namechk.com
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 30 of 27
Blogs and Social Media
▪ To be comprehensive, fraud examiners must
check blogs and social media for:
• Background on prospective witnesses and
suspects:
• What are they saying online?
• What are they complaining about?
• Awareness of potential risks and security issues
• What people are saying about the company:
• Find potential tips or dissatisfied customers and
employees.
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 31 of 27
Main Social Media Sites
▪ Main sites:
▪ Other sites
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 32 of 27
▪ Claims more than 560 million users
worldwide
▪ Older, more professional demographic
▪ Wealthier subjects and executives more likely
to be on this platform
▪ Subjects much less likely to use aliases
▪ Types of information available:
• Place/jurisdiction of residence, employment
history, professional connections, knowledge or
skills, contact information
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 33 of 27
LinkedIn Tips
▪ Switch profile
settings to
anonymous to
avoid alerting
subject.
▪ Search by
name,
employer.
▪ Look for what
isn’t there.
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 34 of 27
▪ Most popular social media site in the world
▪ More than 2 billion active users worldwide
▪ Becoming less popular with younger
demographic
▪ Valuable resource for any type of information
or investigation
▪ Privacy settings not necessarily deal
breakers
▪ Settings and policies subject to change
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 35 of 27
Facebook Tips
▪ If no profile found initially, incorporate middle
name, search for family.
▪ Narrow down results by school, hometown,
current city, employer, mutual friends.
▪ Look for tagged photos and statuses,
comments, and groups.
▪ Search by user ID.
▪ Search by name, alias, email, and phone
number.
▪ You could show up as suggested friend.
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 36 of 27
▪ More than 1 billion active users
▪ More popular with younger demographic than
older
▪ Privacy settings “all or nothing”
▪ Types of information:
• Place of residence, connections, habits, activity
timelines, hobbies/interests, travel, self-incrimination,
lifestyle, assets, and sentiment
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 37 of 27
Instagram Tips
▪ Pay attention to geotagging or time stamp
info.
▪ Aliases much more likely to be used, but this
can be an advantage if a user is found via a
linked account (e.g., Twitter).
▪ If a subject’s profile is private, try friends and
family.
▪ You could show up as a suggested
connection.
▪ It is not browser-friendly.
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 38 of 27
▪ It has more than 330 million active users.
▪ If the subject isn’t “verified,” they might not
use their real name.
▪ Types of information:
• Place of residence, connections, habits, sentiment,
activity timelines, hobbies/interests, travel, self-
incrimination, lifestyle, assets
▪ It’s great for monitoring subjects during an
investigation and identifying potential
witnesses.
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 39 of 27
Twitter Tips
▪ Use TweetDeck to follow multiple accounts,
topics, and geolocations.
▪ Identify subjects using geolocation and
TweetDeck.
▪ Privacy are settings similar to Instagram, “all
or nothing,” but fewer people use them.
▪ You could show up as suggested connection.
▪ Patience is required for subjects with many
tweets.
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 40 of 27
Other Sites
▪ YouTube—not a great source if the subject
hasn’t uploaded videos
▪ Pinterest—not a lot of personal information or
meaningful interaction, not easy to search
▪ Tumblr—hard to find users but could provide
valuable psychological insight
▪ Periscope—not as many users, but if could
be a be a great resource if the subject has an
active profile
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 41 of 27
Other Sites
▪ Regional sites—Vkontakte (Russia/Eastern
Europe), WeChat (China), Weibo (China)
▪ Messaging apps—Snapchat, WhatsApp,
▪ Online forums—Reddit, niche sites, dating
sites
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 42 of 27
Social Media Tools
▪ Social Mention
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 43 of 27
Social Media Tools
▪ Intel Techniques
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 44 of 27
Social Media Tools
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 45 of 27
Social Media Tools
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 46 of 27
Social Media Tools
▪ Tweetdeck
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 47 of 27
Social Media Tools
▪ Input “fraud charges” geocode:30.272164,-
97.750225,10km” for geolocation search.
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 48 of 27
Social Media Tools
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 49 of 27
Social Media Tools
▪ Stalkscan
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 50 of 27
Social Media Tools
▪ Search is Back!
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 51 of 27
Social Media Tools
▪ Snap Map
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 52 of 27
Social Media Tools
▪ Reddit Investigator
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 53 of 27
Social Media Tools
▪ TweetBeaver
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 54 of 27
Social Media Tools
▪ Webstagram
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 55 of 27
Social Media Tools
▪ Webstagram
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 56 of 27
Social Media Tools
▪ Webstagram
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 57 of 27
Social Media Tools
▪ Webstagram
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 58 of 27
Social Media Tools
▪ Webstagram
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 59 of 27
News
▪ Search engines have targeted news
searches:
• Search tools
▪ News databases:
• LexisNexis
• Factiva
• HighBeam
• Proquest
▪ Local news sources
▪ Press release databases
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 60 of 27
News
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 61 of 27
News
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 62 of 27
News
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 63 of 27
Public Records
▪ Directories of local government sites with
public records available:
• Publicrecords.onlinesearches.com
• Publicrecords.searchsystems.net
• BRBPub.com
▪ Political donation information:
• Followthemoney.org
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 64 of 27
Nonprofits and Charities
▪ GuideStar.org
• Search GuideStar’s database of more
than 700,000 U.S. nonprofit
organizations.
▪ Nozasearch.com
• Noza gathers data about private
foundation activities that might be of
interest to grantseekers, philanthropic
organizations, and individual donors. It
has information about more than
60,000 nonprofit organizations.
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 65 of 27
Corporation Search
▪ Connect subjects of an investigation to
relevant entities by searching for a
company’s registration, formation, address,
agents and officers, and more:
• Kompass.com
• Corporationwiki.com
• Opencorporates.com
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 66 of 27
Online Tracing Resources
▪ By using Whois protocol and other searches
you can potentially identify:
• Technical information about owner or registrant of
an email address or website
• Additional websites registered to a subject
• Subject’s Internet Service Provider (ISP)
• Location of a website’s server
▪ User-friendly tools available
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 67 of 27
Web Domains/IPs
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 68 of 27
Web Domains/IPs
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 69 of 27
Web Domains/IPs
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 70 of 27
Web Domains/IPs
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 71 of 27
Web Domains/IPs
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 72 of 27
Web Domains/IPs
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 73 of 27
Maps and Images
▪ Get latitude
and longitude
for geolocation
purposes with
Google Maps.
▪ Use Street
View.
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 74 of 27
Maps and Images
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 75 of 27
Maps and Images
▪ Reverse image searches through Tineye,
Google, Bing, or Yandex
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 76 of 27
Maps and Images
▪ Reverse image searches through Tineye,
Google, Bing, or Yandex
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 77 of 27
Maps and Images
▪ Metadata (exif):
• Right-click on image, copy address, and put into
tool or upload.
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 78 of 27
Maps and Images
▪ Geolocation
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 79 of 27
Case Study
▪ Burkman allegedly
told reporters that the
information he has in
this tweet comes
from Surefire
Intelligence.
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 80 of 27
Case Study
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 81 of 27
Case Study
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 82 of 27
Case Study
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 83 of 27
Case Study
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 84 of 27
Case Study
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 85 of 27
Case Study
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 86 of 27
Case Study
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 87 of 27
Case Study
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 88 of 27
Case Study
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 89 of 27
Case Study
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 90 of 27
Case Study
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 91 of 27
Case Study
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 92 of 27
Case Study
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 93 of 27
Case Study
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 94 of 27
Case Study
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 95 of 27
Case Study
© 2018 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 96 of 27
Questions?
Mason Wilder, CFE
512-276-4184