prevention and mitigation of snowstorm in nweb.cortland.edu/matresearch/g3snowstormfins2020.pdf ·...
TRANSCRIPT
Prevention and Mitigation of Snowstorm in N.Y
Group 3 Jinbo Wang, Xulong Zhu, Mengqi Li, Guanlin Wang, Yu Guan MFE 634 Spring 2020
Topics to cover
• BACKGROUND • FLOWCHART • COPQ • AFFINITY DIAGRAM • FISHBONE CHART • QUALITY ASSESSMENT • PROCESS CAPABILITY
ANALYSIS
• DESIGN OF EXPERIMENT
• VALUE STREAM MAP
• ACCEPTANCE SAMPLING
PLAN
• SPC
• CONCLUSION
Background
A Snowstorm is a weather condition where snow is not falling but loose snow on the ground is lifted and blown by strong winds. Snowstorm characterized by strong sustained winds of at least 56 km/h (35 mph) and lasting for a prolonged period of time—typically three hours or more. Snowstorm can bring whiteout conditions, and can paralyze regions for days at a time.
Snow Depth Map
Snow Depth Map by 2016
When a snowstorm comes, there are the following problems: • Property damage • Personal safety • Traffic paralysis
Our task is to analyze the potential problems of Snowstorm in New York from an internal and external perspective, and explore solutions to prevent failures and solve problems through quality analysis methods.
Problem Statement
Process Chart
Snowstorm Forecast
Prepare Supplies
Snowstorm Coming
Clear Snow
Distribute Supplies
Snowstorm End
Flowchart Start
Monitoring Snowstorm
Detected? Keep improving the prevention planNO
Detection Building HumanEmergency
Plan
Wind Snowfall
MonitoringStation
Packed Isolator
V roof Training
Mitigation Plan
Police Straff Rescue TeamNew York State
Dep of Transportation
Sweeping Snow
Reassure stranded
passengers
Solution
Measure Sustainable
End
Yes
Cost of Poor Quality
Process Internal Failure External Failure Appraisal Prevention
Prepare(include both long and short term): Monitoring Snowstorm
Inspection Equipment Failure Test all equipment
Technical Support,Periodical Inspection
Emergency Notification False Notification Recheck
Building Reinforce Test Structural Strength
Power Backup Guarantee Equipment Failure
Business, Communication Failure
Make Available Alternative Power Resource
Build Shelters Shelter Collapsing People Getting Injured/Dying inspection of Shelters
Tents Support, Use Good Quality Material, Flood Proof Shelters
Stock Emergency Supplies
Storage Equipment Failure, Shortage Theft, Lost Periofical Inspection
Protect Property(temporary methods) Damage to Property Periofical Inspection
Cost Of Poor Quality
During:
Clear roads Sweeping Equipment Failure Traffic accident
Test sweeping equipment
Send Emergency Team Not enough training
Move Victims to Shelter
The Construction problem, Shelter Shortage
The Residents Were Relutanted to Evacuate Tents Support
Provide Necessity for Life
Water and Food Shortage
Complaints Were Raised by Residents
Standerization of Food and Water Supply
Provide Power Eletricity and Fule Shortage
Complaints Were Raised by Residents
Emergency Electrical Supply,Eletric Generater Backup
Rescue Inspection Equipment Failure Limited 911 Services
After:
Return of Victims Vehicle Damage and Shortage
The Residents Were Relutanted to Return Deport Colonias
Home, Schools, Hospitals Rebuilding
Materials and Equipment Shortage Insurance
Prepare for The Next Snowstorm
Periofical Inspection, Training
Affinity Diagram
Media Government Department of Transportation Residents Rescue Department
Late news update Insufficient places Low efficiency of snow clearner
Insufficient awareness of the disaster
Insufficient equipments
Low forecast effciency and accuracy Poor management Insufficient staff
Insufficient self recuse knowledge Low efficiency staff
Fishbone Chart
• Training the rescue worker and medical staff based on corresponding standards.
• Reduce clearing snow time through using new transportation methods.
• Verify the new monitor system.
Improvements to Current System (Suggestions)
Process Capability
• Random data with mean 21.7 and variance 6.8
• LSL= 10; USL=30 • x=̅ 21.71; σ=6.881 • Cp=0.53; Cpk=0.44
• Random data with mean 15.6 and variance 5.5
• LSL= 10; USL=25 • x=̅ 15.61; σ=5.312 • Cp=0.45; Cpk=0.34
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Pareto Chart of Factors
DOE DATA A B C Responeses
10 1 -1 7.96154454
10 1 -1 9.20314993
10 1 1 4.86028205
10 1 1 12.7564534
10 2 -1 14.8727997
10 2 -1 15.2598967
10 2 1 10.8465247
10 2 1 20.2900425
20 1 -1 1.82594053
20 1 -1 6.72531718
20 1 1 -1.24996489
20 1 1 11.8293398
20 2 -1 10.8597796
20 2 -1 20.0640941
20 2 1 9.19314748
20 2 1 21.6229455
Start
Specific affected area and
snowfall detected
Process
T = 1 day
Reliability: 50%
Accuracy: 70%
Media inform citizens to take
precautionary measures
Process
T = 1 day
Citizens Reserve Food,
Cancel long distance journey
Process
T = 1 day
Snowstorm is coming
Block high speeds in severe
areas
Process
T = 3 Hours
Transport department
shovel road and melt snow
Process
T = 1 Hours/3 Hours
Rescuing victims and
homeless people
Process
T = 8 Hours
Snowstorm end
VSM(CURRENT)
Start
Specific affected area and
snowfall detected
Process
T = 1 day
Reliability: 70%
Accuracy: 90%
Media inform citizens to take
precautionary measures
Process
T = 1 day
Citizens Reserve Food,
Cancel long distance journey
Process
T = 1 day
Snowstorm is coming
Block high speeds in severe areas,
Transport department shovel road and
melt snow
Process
T = 3 Hours
Rescuing victims and
homeless people
Process
T = 8 Hours
Snowstorm end
VSM(FUTURE)
Statistical Variables
● 𝝰: Producer’s Risk - short cleaning time design is rejected. ● 𝞫: Consumer’s Risk - long cleaning time design is accepted. ● AQL: Acceptable Quality Level - the level of defectiveness, set by
the producer as a minimum “goal”, citizens usually like zero defectiveness but there are always something uncertainty.
● Lot Size: Total number of items - estimated number of snow cleaner equipment total in the system.
● LTPD: Lot Tolerance Percent Defective - the maximum defectiveness that the producer will accept in the product as to not affect the citizens negatively.
Assignment of Variables
⍺ 0.05
β 0.2
AQL 0.1
LTPD 0.2
Lot Size 100
Nomograph Analysis
• n= 80 • c= 12
Operating Characteristic Curve (OC Curve)
● An OC Curve visualizes the probability for a sampling plan, showing the probability of accepting a lot given the percent defectiveness
● This probability is calculated using a Binomial Distribution
Excel OC Curve PD Bin_Pa
0 1.00000
0.01 1.00000
0.02 1.00000
0.03 0.99999
0.04 0.99987
0.05 0.99926
0.06 0.99713
0.07 0.99160
0.08 0.97999
0.09 0.95931
0.1 0.92693
0.11 0.88131
0.12 0.82238
0.13 0.75172
0.14 0.67224
0.15 0.58770
0.16 0.50212
0.17 0.41926
0.18 0.34220
0.19 0.27310
0.2 0.21321
0.00000
0.20000
0.40000
0.60000
0.80000
1.00000
1.20000
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41
Effect n and c on OC curve
0.21 0.16291
0.22 0.12188
0.23 0.08932
0.24 0.06415
0.25 0.04517
0.26 0.03119
0.27 0.02113
0.28 0.01405
0.29 0.00917
0.3 0.00587
0.31 0.00369
0.32 0.00228
0.33 0.00138
0.34 0.00082
0.35 0.00048
0.36 0.00028
0.37 0.00016
0.38 0.00009
0.39 0.00005
0.4 0.00003
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Fraction detective
OC Curve Minitab vs Excel
minitab excel
Comparisons Between Minitab & Excel
Control Chart • An X-bar and R (range) chart is a pair of control charts used with processes
that have a subgroup size of two or more. The standard chart for variables data, X-bar and R charts help determine if a process is stable and predictable.
• The p-chart is a type of control chart used to monitor the proportion of nonconforming units in a sample, where the sample proportion nonconforming is defined as the ratio of the number of nonconforming units to the sample size.
• The c-chart is a type of control chart used to monitor "count"-type data, typically total number of nonconformities per unit.
Data For R,P&C Charts
Data Generate:
• Random Integer in Minitab between 10-20 for Cleaning snow time (Two Trails with 100 data each)
X-bar R-chart(Cleaning Time)
P-chart(Cleaning Time)
C-chart(Cleaning Time)
Summary of Problems detected
The problems are detected by the citizens complaint:
• They can’t get supplies during the road blocked.
• The power off because of wire is broken.
• Disconnect Internet.
• Not enough Heat.
Sending more snow clearer can reduce cleaning time, but the cost is higher.
Inefficient usage of snow cleaner and rescue crew.
Solution proposed
Train the rescue worker to make the rescue much faster.
Improve the monitor function and improve snow removal efficiency, avoid wasting resources.
Storage more food and medicine in different area close to where people live and check the quality of these things at a regular interval.
Simplify the procedure of news report and material distribution.
Conclusion
By applying COPQ, flowchart and affinity diagram, we can find there are many extra cost in our project.
By acceptance sampling plan we find increase transportation equipment and improve the monitor system, which can effectively reduce snow cleaning time. So our system is optimized.
The SPC leads our project to the right rack and keep improving.
Thank you!