pressure ulcer prevention: bringing it home to the perianesthesia world
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Pressure Ulcer Prevention: Bringing It Home to the Perianesthesia World](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022072116/5750847b1a28abf34fae6861/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
ANNUAL ASPAN CONFERENCE ABSTRACTS e13
‘‘CBSPAN’S PRIDE: OUR WEBSITE’S SUCCESS’’Marie Graziela Bautista, BSN, RN, CPAN, CAPA,
Mary Kathryn Paskewitz, RN, CPAN (Webmaster),
Michele Joynes, BSN, RN, CPAN, Julianne Harp, MSN, RN, CPAN,
Karen Hoskins, RN, CPAN, Patricia Sendelbach, BSN, RN, CCRN, CPAN,
Elizabeth Wilson, RN, CPAN
Communication is vital to the success of any organization but requires
significant time and resources. CBSPAN covers 3 states with 4 districts.
As membership and activities increased, leaders and members became
frustrated due to the ineffectiveness of existing systems. The website’s
goal was to create and design an efficient communication system among
the Districts. The process involved the collection of information from
membership by website representatives and CBSPAN leaders to send
to the webmaster. Revisions are then made to the website when re-
ceived. Quarterly the entire website is reviewed. Guidelines have been
implemented. The CBSPAN website’s positive impact is that it became
an active source of information among members. Accurate and timely in-
formation are captured including Component, ASPAN and ABPANC in-
formation. Since the website went live in 2004 visits have increased
from 4,000 to 15,000 annually. Sources of visits are both national and in-
ternational. CBSPAN leaders expressed satisfaction and communication
inefficiencies decreased. The most satisfying outcome is the increased
number of perianesthesia nurses that are reached through dissemination
of educational information. CBSPAN website has far exceeded expecta-
tions from communication, marketing and education. Through team-
work and creativity, the website has become the Component’s pride.
JOURNEY TO HAND HYGIENE COMPLIANCE IN THEPHASE I PACUPresenter: Jane E. Holsinger, RN, BSN, CPAN,
Team Members: Jane E. Holsinger, RN, BSN, CPAN,
Melissa Wagoner, RN, AA, RNC, Jessica Close, RN, BSN,
Sandy Trumpower, RN, AA, Roxanna Herbert, RN
Washington County Hospital, Hagerstown, Maryland
Background: An audit of Hand Hygiene practice in our PACU showed
noncompliance with CDC standards.
Objective: To improve patient safety by improving hand hygiene com-
pliance in the Phase I PACU.
Process of Implementation: Numerous steps were taken to improve
hand hygiene compliance. First the result of the audit was presented to
the entire PACU staff. Staff was educated regarding the CDC recommen-
dations for hand hygiene and proper hand hygiene using hand washing
and waterless hand hygiene products. Several staff members continued
monthly monitoring of hand hygiene. The results were reported to the
staff on a monthly basis. The staff was involved in the problem solving
process. Acceptable waterless product for hand hygiene were made
available at the bedside.
Statement of the Successful practice: Hand hygiene will be per-
formed before patient contact, after patient contact and after glove re-
moval 100% of the time.
Statement of the positive outcome achieved: Hand hygiene im-
proved from 32% to 98%.
Implications for Perianesthesia nurses: Hand Hygiene compliance
is achievable in the Phase I PACU when all staff is educated and involved
in the process.
PRESSURE ULCER PREVENTION: BRINGING IT HOME TOTHE PERIANESTHESIA WORLDSusan Andrews, BAN, MA, RN, CAPA, Karen Catchings, BSN, RN, CAPA,
Leslie Edney, BSN, RN, CAPA, Sarah Gillen, AAS, BA, RN, CAPA,
Margaret Johnson, BS, BSN, MSN, RN (presenter),
Nancy Kotti, BSN, CNOR
MCGHealth, Augusta, GA
In October 2008 the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services began
denying payment for nosocomial pressure ulcers. MCGHealth re-
sponded by instituting polices to identify pressure ulcers present
upon admission. The policy required upon admission, transfer and/or
discharge each patient be visually evaluated for the presence of a pres-
sure ulcer and a Braden Risk Assessment also be completed.
This policy proved problematic in the perianesthesia areas for several
reasons. Most of their patients were healthy, younger patients and, de-
pending upon the type of surgery, the patient may not entirely disrobe.
The nurses were not accustomed to performing visual inspections of
their patients, especially those who did not completely disrobe. It was,
however, acknowledged that nosocomial pressure ulcers can be a prob-
lem for patients going to surgery due to positioning and pressure points
that can occur during lengthy surgery.
MCGHealth Perianesthesia developed a program to meet the require-
ments that included scripting to explain the process to patients, staff ed-
ucation, documentation changes, reevaluation of the patient in PACU,
a 360 degree communication program encompassing the entire peri-
operative process.
NORMOTHERMIA: A PERIOPERATIVE PERFORMANCEIMPROVEMENT PROJECTBarbara L. Jones, BSN, RN
Mary Washington Hospital, 1001 Sam Perry Blvd. Fredericksburg,
Virginia 22401
The medical literature indicates that hypothermia triples the risk of sur-
gical site infections after colon surgery; preventing hypothermia is ben-
eficial in reducing other complications; and patients utilizing patient-
controlled warming gowns experience a significant reduction in preop-
erative anxiety. Patients undergoing total joint replacement and colorec-
tal surgery were arriving to our PACU hypothermic. The purpose of our
performance improvement project was to validate the evidence in the
literature; patient-controlled warming gowns are an effective measure
for reducing hypothermia and positively impact patient satisfaction
and perception of thermal comfort. Patient-controlled warming gowns
proved to be an effective measure for reducing hypothermia and were
positively received by our patients. From January-July 2008 excluding
April, 98.8% of all of our surgical patients and 100% of our colorectal sur-
gery patients arrived to PACU normothermic. Via a storyboard, we show-
cased perioperative nursing’s contribution to our hospital’s goals and
patient outcomes including problem identification; decision-making at
the bedside; and nursing’s involvement with quality improvement utiliz-
ing evidence-based practice and a performance improvement model
with measurable results. Also, we touched upon Watson’s Caring
Theory.