president vladimir putin russia-africa · the non-involvement of russia in the slave trade of...
TRANSCRIPT
A
Russia-Africa
May Russia assume her International Responsibilities so
that the Decolonization process of Cabinda is eventually
brought to a successful Conclusion.
Berlin, October 15, 2019
2019
Phone: +49 (0) 176 3068 3616 • Facebook/Bartolomeu_Capita • Twitter/@BCapita • LinkedIn/Cabinda_Independent
d
President Vladimir Putin
2 | P a g e
To H.E. Dr. Vladimir V. PUTIN
President of the Russian Federation
C/o His Excellency Mr. Nebenzia Vassily Alekseevich
Permanent Representative of Russia to the United Nations
136 East 67 Street, New York
N.Y. 10065, USA
Bartolomeu Capita (Mr.)
Refugee under UNHCR mandate
Joint-Presidency, Cabindan National Movement
Email: [email protected]
Tel.: +49 (0) 176 3068 3616
3 | P a g e
Abstract
The Russian Federation, under the leadership of president Vladimir Putin, is irrefutably committed
to advancing the rule of law all over the world, i.e. to achieving the UN ideal of universal peace
through the observance of the core values articulated in the existing tools of international law.
Bearing this in mind, the Russia–Africa Summit and Economic Forum scheduled for 23-24 October
2019 in Sochi (Russia) is a great opportunity for Russians and Africans, and therefore a welcome
event in the eyes of the still subjugated African people of Cabinda.
Seeing the relevance of Moscow’s business program architecture for Russia-Africa economic forum,
it is clear the essence of the 2019 Russia-Africa Summit aims to contribute to a more sustainable
and balanced development across Africa, as well as to unearth new forms of fertile cooperation.
Yet the question arises as to whether African leaders have gotten the highly developed political
awareness required to be up to the task of Russia’s relevant ambition. Hence, it is our task and
duty to draw your attention to the most critical issues likely to undermine Russia’s goodwill.
The colonial occupation of Cabinda by Angola since 1975, which was masterminded by Western
imperialist nations through paragraph 1(e) of the UN GA Resolution 1542 (XV) of 15 December
1960, is, in addition to issues such as Africa’s ever-growing “odious debt” and chronic “political
instability and insecurity, a major challenge Russia needs to address without further delay if she
aims to succeed in Africa. Needless to say Russia’s entitlement to deal with said issues is consistent
with her obligations as a permanent member of the UN SC, and as a full member of the C-24.
Cabinda
4 | P a g e
“How can you turn to a system that got its feed money from
enslaving you, to SAVE you?”
Mr. President,
the above question was carved by Dr. John Clarke on the surface of present and future African
leaders’, scholars’, factory workers’, and peasants’ working desk. As we all know, the cruel system
owing to which countless African men and women have been kidnapped, ruthlessly thrown into
ships’ holds, enslaved, and traded for goods or money for hundreds of years is still prevailing.
Its ultimate purpose, as remarked by the outstanding Russian scholar Irene Caesar (Ph.D.), is to
establish a cashless society with only two classes of people―that is, slave owners and slaves1.
The non-involvement of Russia in the slave trade of African people is a fact forever engraved in
the collective memory of the people of Cabinda. This African country became a noted slave mart
as a result of the imperialistic confrontations between Western European nations, i.e. Portugal,
Netherlands, Britain, and France, aimed at controlling Cabinda ever since the early 17th century.
Racial prejudice against black-skinned people, which underlies the fervor of particular Western
tribes to enslave, subjugate, and destroy the nature, frustrates the UN ideal of universal peace.
In order to give free rein to the slave-owning system, the jungle-like system in which we’re living,
and whose ideology is “might is right,” i.e. “what is mine is mine and what is yours is negotiable,”
the promoters of said system must necessarily do every effort so that the nations without a slave-
owning past, e.g. Russia, are eventually by their side. Disguised as a philanthropic organization,
the so-called “Congo Free State,” owned by the ruthless Belgian King Leopold II, ended up being
endorsed even by Russia at the Berlin-Congo Conference (1884-1885).2
1 Dr. Irene Caesar: https://irenecaesar.wordpress.com/2014/03/25/chabad-coup-detat-in-ukraine-khazars-play-double-game-ans-shoot-both-sides/ 2 The Crimes against Humanity by King Leopold II in his “Congo Free State”: https://youtu.be/ayPvqCL7UPs
― Dr. John Henrik Clarke
5 | P a g e
“Russia has the potential to be a force of stability or a force of
turmoil, but when it comes to global affairs, can she be persuaded
to join the world order? Will yesterday’s revolutionary power
become tomorrow’s stabilizer?”3
Mr. President,
in the eyes of the nations and peoples across the globe who have fasted the bitterness of slavery
and colonial subjugation, and are now victims of imperialistic policies that sow chaos, destruction,
and death meant to depopulate the so-called third world4, the Russian Federation is undeniably
a trustworthy subject of international law. Dr. Irene Caesar’s further article5, this time about you,
is a school for African leaders insofar as your spiritual and moral conversion is a miracle. You’ve
tasted the acidity of the earth in order to turn the cries of pain of your nation into a song of joy.
Africa has good enough reasons to turn to the multipolar system you are a fervent advocate of.
Underlying the multipolar system that you are in favor of is the culture of mutual respect, of win-
win problem solving, and of exploring approaches to overcoming inner and outer challenges in
consideration of democratic principles and values. Only this system can make the fundamental
human rights, the dignity and worth of the human person, and the equal rights of men and women
and of nations large and small a reality. In this sense, Russia is a constructive revolutionary power.
It is also the task and duty of Africans to encourage and help Russia to stand firm in her role as
a force of global stability. We are required to do so through a ceaseless exchange of expertise;
a never-ending dialog emphasizing the fundamental right of all peoples to self-determination;
and a constant pledge of solidarity with each other in the fight against the subjection of peoples
to alien subjugation, domination and exploitation, and in the struggle for economic and social
development. In this connection, we request Russia to consider the following critical issues.
3 Michael Stuermer, Putin and the Rise of Russia, Phoenix (London) 2009, see: back cover. 4 Dr. Henry Kissinger’s depopulation policy: http://www.rense.com/general59/kissingereugenics.htm 5 Dr. Irene Caesar: https://irenecaesar.wordpress.com/2016/10/26/revenge-of-spiridon-007-on-british-crown/
6 | P a g e
The Colonial Occupation of Cabinda by Proxy
The colonial occupation of Cabinda by proxy must be taken very seriously into consideration by
the Russian Federation, inasmuch as what seems to be an unintentional involvement of the Soviet
Union in such occupation is very likely to undermine Russia’s international standing in the long run.
The warlike occupation of Cabinda by Angola’s ruling MPLA party, in 1975, was actually plotted
by Western imperialist nations as early as 1960, i.e. well before Angola achieved independence
in 1975, as witnessed by the UN GA Resolution 1542 (XV) of 15 December 1960.
As you may know, this schemed attack on Cabinda’s political sovereignty and territorial integrity,
with the arrogation of Cabinda’s rich oil reserves as its ultimate intent, undermines international
peace and security in southern Africa, since it facilitates the subjection of the people of Cabinda
and of the neighboring countries to alien subjugation, domination and exploitation. Therefore,
we urge Russia to undertake her duty to help the people of the Non-Self-Governing Territory of
Cabinda in bringing their decolonization process to a fruitful conclusion, according to their choice.
Russia’s obligations in Cabinda, and Africa at large, derive from her international responsibilities
as a permanent Member of the UN Security Council, upon which the Charter of the United Nations
confers primary duty for the maintenance of international peace and security; and as a Member
of the UN Special Committee on Decolonization or C-24, which is the UN body fully devoted to
the issue of decolonization, with the purpose of monitoring the implementation of the UN General
Assembly Resolution 1514 (XV) of 14 December 1960.
Cabinda and Western Imperialistic Rivalries
Imperialistic wars between Western European nations, namely: Portugal, Netherlands, Britain,
and France, aimed at controlling Cabinda started in 1600. In 1883 Cabinda lost an enormous
part of its territory as a result of its occupation by the French. The fact is that the French menaced
to occupy the remaining territory, i.e. the present-day Cabinda6. To protect themselves against
French threats, the sovereign people of Cabinda signed an international protectorate treaty with
Portugal in 1885, and it got attention and ratification at the 1884/85 Berlin-Congo Conference.
Shortly after, the German quest for a noteworthy sphere of influence in Africa, with Cabinda in
mind, was felt. Though subscribed to by Portugal and Cabinda, the German quest infuriated the
French. As a result, France pledged to frustrate the German aspiration. Hence the French resolve
to undermine the right of the people of Cabinda to achieve and sustain self-determination, self-
defense, and self-respect. The truth is that the occupation of Cabinda by Angola was deliberate,
and carried out in two steps, i.e. a legal-political attack and a military strike.
6 The British Newspaper “The Economist” of 18 October 1884 reported said threat as follows: “The French threaten to occupy much of the Congo,” i.e. Cabinda, then known as the “Portuguese Congo.”
7 | P a g e
The Plotters’ Legal-political Attack
The legal-political attack on Cabinda’s national sovereignty and territorial integrity is confirmed
by the aforementioned UN GA Resolution 1542 (XV). In the aftermath of this attack, the People's
Movement for the Liberation of Angola (MPLA), which was then starting its struggle against the
Portuguese colonial rule, found itself under the sponsorship of what Springmeier7 names “large
masonic-controlled Christian denominations who donated millions of US dollars to the NCC8 and
WCC, which moneys were then passed on to the guerrillas (MPLA) to buy weapons and ammo”.
Secretly funded by Western bloc countries, financial institutions, corporations, as well as Western
Christian denominations, the MPLA had to use its subsidies to pay the then Soviet Union and Cuba
for weapons, ammunitions, and military trainers in order to display itself to the anti-colonial and
revolutionary world as being Marxist guerrillas9. In 1962 Viriato da Cruz, a founder and leader
of the MPLA, known for his insightful perception of Marxism, was deceitfully expelled from the
MPLA whose leadership was instantly usurped by the corrupt Agostinho Neto and Lúcio Lara.
In the twinkling of an eye, the then-ruling Pan-African leaders perceived the treasonous acts of
the MPLA’s new leadership. In September 1963, the MPLA business office in Kinshasa (DRC) was
shut, its leaders were arrested, and afterward expelled on the Congolese government’s orders10.
In order to finalize the erasure of Cabinda plotted in the GA Resolution 1542 (XV), the presidents
of Congo-Brazzaville and Congo-Kinshasa who supported the independence of Cabinda had to
be overthrown―Abbé Fulbert Youlou in August 1963, and Joseph Kasavubu in November 1965.
The Plotters’ Military Strike
In the aftermath of the Carnation Revolution in April 1974, Portugal made every effort to have
Cabinda’s political sovereignty reinstated. As her effort was foiled by men serving both US and
French interests, namely: Dr. Mário Soares (Portugal), Mobutu Sese Seko (Zaïre, now RDC), and
Henriques T. Nzita (Cabinda?), Portugal, though a member State of NATO, had no choice but to
turn to the then-revolutionary (Russia) Soviet Union for help. In this connection, Portuguese captain
Costa Martins declared, quote: “A Soviet Union support for Portugal is required.”11
7 Fritz Springmeier, Bloodlines of the Illuminati, USA: 1995, pp. 128-129. 8 NCC AB is a Swedish Construction Company, the second largest in the Nordic region; and WCC stands for World Council of Churches, a worldwide fellowship of churches seeking unity, a common witness and Christian service. 9 Tor Sellström, Liberation in Southern Africa – Regional and Swedish Voices: Interviews from Angola, Mozambique, Namibia, South Africa, Zimbabwe, the Frontline and Sweden, Nordiska Afrikainstitutet, Uppsala, 2002, pp. 10, 15, 353. See also Lara Pawson, The 27 May in Angola: A View from Below, Lisbon: 2007, p. 18. Also George Wright, The Destruction of a Nation: United States’ Policy Toward Angola since 1945, Pluto Press, London: 1997. And also John Stockwell, In Search of Enemies: A CIA Story, WW Norton, New York, 1978. 10 Bartolomeu Capita, Cabinda: Obama’s Challenges in Africa, Lisbon & London: Chiado Publishing, 2013, p. 483. 11 Ibid. p. 312.
8 | P a g e
Since the hearing by the UN GA Fourth Committee of a Cabindan leader, as a petitioner (1962),
has evidenced the illicitness of the integration of Cabinda into Angola through the GA Resolution
1542, there was a need for a new legal tool meant to legalize and legitimize the incorporation
of Cabinda into Angola by force this time. Hence the advent of the 1975 Alvor treaty between
Portugal and the Angolan freedom movements (FNLA, MPLA, UNITA), in which Portugal accepted
the right of the people of Angola to self-determination and independence.
Art. 3 of the Alvor agreement, on which the people of Cabinda had no input, declared Cabinda
to be “an integral and inalienable part of Angola.” This was the legal tool upon which Angola’s
power over Cabinda would be based. Yet, thanks to OAU’s vigorous protest at its 12th Ordinary
Summit of Heads of State and Government held in Kampala (Uganda) from 28 July to 1st August
1975, Portugal invalidated purely and simply said agreement via the Decreto-Lei (Decree-Law)
458-A/75 of 22 August 1975. So Angola’s power over Cabinda is totally devoid of legal title.
Actually, the military takeover of the oil-rich territory of Cabinda (1974/75) by Angola’s ruling
MPLA has been enabled by the military assistance of the then-Soviet Union and Castro’s Cuba,
without neglecting the substantial amount of covert funding the MPLA obtained from France and
USA all at once. In the face of African governments’ reluctance to grant the new Angolan regime
diplomatic recognition, as its leaders were suspected of betraying African people’s fight against
colonialism, USSR had to exert pressures to obtain African recognition of the MPLA regime12.
We are not questioning the legitimacy of Russia’s presence in Angola, as well as in Cabinda, for
the reason that the Soviet Union (Russia) was “formally” invited by Portugal. What is actually at
stake is ensuring that Russia reassesses the legitimacy of the Cabinda people’s right to self-rule,
and ultimately contributes for the effective and complete implementation, in Cabinda, of the UN
GA Resolutions 1514 (XV) and 1803 (XVII). This is consistent with Russia’s global responsibilities
as a permanent Member of the UN Security Council, and a full Member of the C-24.13
It is a fact that Angola's ruling party (MPLA) is ever since the early 1960s backed by the United
States of America and the Soviet Union (i.e. Russia) all at once. Therefore, nations and individuals
acquainted with Cabinda’s legitimate right to self-rule cannot help bearing in mind the following
two questions: 1) “on what arguments is the Russian Federation approving the subjection of the
people of Cabinda to alien subjugation, domination, and exploitation?” 2) “on what grounds is
Russia authorizing Angola to deprive the people of Cabinda of their own means of subsistence?”
12 Dr. Odd Arne Westad, Moscow and the Angolan Crisis, 1974-1976: A New Pattern of Intervention, Cold War International History Project – “CWIHP” Bulletin 8/9 Winter 1996/1997, pp. 24, 27, 33. 13 Doc. of the 17th Session of the UN General Assembly—4th Committee A/C. 4/SR 1391 of 20 November 1962, & Annexes, Agenda item 54, documents A/5160 and add. 1 and 2. https://cabindacitizenship.files.wordpress.com/2019/09/request-to-special-political-and-decolonization-4th-committee.pdf
9 | P a g e
Africa’s ever-growing Odious Debt
Russia has the potential to contribute extensively to justice and peace in Africa, and thereby help
promote to the utmost the well-being of Africa’s present and future generations. In spite of that,
the political outcomes of Africa’s ever-growing debt are likely to undermine Russia’s interest in
the African continent, and thus allow Africa to be preserved as a vile body on which an assembly
of politic birds of prey will endlessly sit down and make a comfortable meal. The “odious debt”
incurred by African rulers is the cause of big concern, as it is the result of a debt-trap diplomacy14.
A Russian, as well as a Chinese, noteworthy sphere of influence in Africa is feared by Western
imperialist nations and firms that have played an important role in the slave trade, and in the
colonization of the African continent, ever since the 1955 Asian-African Conference15 in Bandung
(Indonesia), of which Russia was one of its main protagonists. At this Talks, “the assembled leaders
stressed the fundamental right of all peoples to self-rule, and pledged their solidarity with each
other in the fight against colonialism and in the struggle for economic and social development.”
Six months after the 1955 Asian-African Conference, Western imperialist regimes agreed that
“Western Europe’s very existence depends on the resources of Africa and the continued control
exercised by the Western European powers over the African continent.”16 Despite the fact that
debt-trap diplomacy is a tool devised by Western powers to perpetuate their control over Africa,
Western propaganda is likely to accuse Russia, in the same way it accuses China today, of being
the originator of the debt-trap diplomacy meant to impede Africa’s economic take-off.
According to John Adams, who was once US president, “there are two ways to enslave a nation;
one is by the sword, the other is by debt.” After Africans were invaded, ransacked, kidnapped,
cruelly thrown into ships’ holds, enslaved, and traded for goods or money for hundreds of years
as a result of the ruthlessness of Western swords, came the time for Western imperialist nations
to enslave Africans by way of debt. The success of the Russian-African cooperation is measured
by its power to extricate Africa from both the “odious debt”17 and “debt-trap diplomacy.”
14 Debt-trap diplomacy is a type of diplomacy based on debt carried out in the bilateral relations between countries. It involves one creditor country intentionally extending excessive credit to another debtor country with
the intention of extracting economic or political concessions from the debtor country when it becomes unable to honor its debt obligations (often asset-based lending, with assets including infrastructure). The conditions of the loans are often not made public and the loaned money is, as a rule, used to pay contractors from the creditor country. Debt trap is a situation where the debt is made difficult to pay, because the lender has set a high interest. 15 Africa’s survival today: https://cabindacitizenship.files.wordpress.com/2017/07/2-china-and-russia-and-the-bandung-nations-africas-survival-today.pdf 16 Conversation between Dr. Paulo Cunha, Portuguese foreign minister and the Honorable John Foster Dulles, US secretary of state, in Foreign Relations of the United States, 1955–1957, Volume XXVII, Western Europe and Canada, Document 148: Memorandum of a Conversation, Department of State, Washington, November 30, 1955. Link: http://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1955-57v27/d148 17 Aleksandr Naumovich Zak, Les effets des transformations des Etats sur leurs dettes publiques et autres obligations financières (i.e. Effects of the transformations of the states in their public debts and other financial obligations), published in Paris in 1927. Also Robert Howse, The Concept of Odious Debt in Public International Law, Discussion Papers: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, No. 185 - July 2007, UN/Geneva, p. 2.
10 | P a g e
On 8 October 2019, discussing about the return in force of Russia to Africa, the political scientists
of VOA (Voice of America), namely: Rui Neumann and Raúl Braga Pires, emphasized that for its
return to Africa, Moscow counts on the support of current African leaders (like Angola’s president
João Lourenço) and scholars trained in Russia during the Soviet era18. Yet, despite their exhibited
close ties with Russia, the very Russian trained African leaders are actually stooges of Western
imperialism in Africa, as their role consists in easing the looting by aliens of their nations’ wealth.
In order to avoid a foreseeable coalition between Western imperialist nations and the neglected
African grassroots against the Russian-African cooperation, Russia has to make sure that African
nations fully enjoy their rights upheld in the UNGA Resolutions 1514 (XV) of 14 December 1960;
1803 (XVII) of 14 December 1962; and in the 1966 International Covenants on Civil and Political
Rights, and on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights. Furthermore, Russia has to ensure that her
African counterparts rid their respective countries of poverty, corruption, and dictatorship.
Africa’s Political Instability and Insecurity
Security is definitely what any human being or nation looks for in the first place. The fact remains
that if Africa had powerful armaments and allies of present-day Russia’s or Germany’s stature,
slavery would have never existed. Napoleon Bonaparte was reported as saying, “there are only
two forces that unite men, i.e. fear and interest.” It is fear and interest that have united Europeans
and European-Americans to the point of devising a common defense policy, i.e. NATO. Africans
are expected to upgrade the 1955 Asian-African Conference into a common defense policy.
Black leaders and scholars who are acquainted with African history are certainly aware of the
fact that black-skinned people all over the world are facing the danger of extinction. In fact, if
Africans do not work together in an organized and orderly manner, they will never ever be able
to engage successfully with a globalized world; and if Africans do not mentally take the reins
and utilize the power of their minds to chart the course to their own goals, the very existence of
the black-skinned race cannot help having its days numbered.
Africans are not fully aware of the fact that they are being wiped out all at once in subtle and
obvious ways. The methods and circumstances surrounding the killing of Africans were conceived
not to cause fear in the victims of tomorrow and after-tomorrow. Dr. Albert Churchward (1852-
1925), in his book titled “The Origin and Evolution of Primitive Man,” confirms the destruction of
black people like this: “They have been exterminated in Europe, North America, Japan, Australia
and Tasmania, but I have no doubt they are to be found in other places not yet explored.”19
18 Ana Guedes, 2Rs, África Ocidental: o regresso em força da Rússia à África (2Rs, West Africa: the return in force of Russia to Africa), VOA: https://www.voaportugues.com/a/5115449.html 19 A. Churchward, The Origin and Evolution of Primitive Man, George Allen & Company, Ltd., London: 1912, p. 13.
11 | P a g e
Can Fear of being wiped out unite Africans?
Racial prejudice against black-skinned people, which is at the root of the global ethnic cleansing
in progress, is the driving force behind Benjamin Franklin’s wish to increase the number of purely
white people in the world, i.e. to lessen that of other races. Behind the theory of the Aryan master
race by the French aristocrat Joseph Arthur de Gobineau, who first printed a “celebrated” Essay
on the misleading Inequality of the Human Races (1853-55), lies racial bias against Africans and
people of African descent all over the world. Benjamin Franklin, in his own words:
Why should Pennsylvania, founded by the English, become a Colony of Aliens, who will shortly
be so numerous as to Germanize us instead of our Anglifying them, and will never adopt our
Language or Customs, any more than they can acquire our Complexion.
24. Which leads me to add one Remark: That the Number of purely white People in the World
is proportionally very small. All Africa is black or tawny. Asia chiefly tawny. America (exclusive
of the new Comers) wholly so. And in Europe, the Spaniards, Italians, French, Russians and
Swedes, are generally of what we call a swarthy Complexion; as are the Germans also, the
Saxons only excepted, who with the English, make the principal Body of White People on the
face of the Earth. I could wish their Numbers were increased. And while we are, as I may call it,
scouring our Planet, by clearing America of Woods, and so making this Side of our Globe reflect
a brighter Light to the Eyes of Inhabitants in Mars or Venus, why should we in the Sight of Superior
Beings, darken its People? why increase the Sons of Africa, by Planting them in America, where
we have so fair an Opportunity, by excluding all Blacks and Tawneys, of increasing the lovely
White and Red? But perhaps I am partial to the Complexion of my Country, for such Kind of
Partiality is natural to Mankind.20
“Joseph Arthur Comte de Gobineau, credited as being the father of modern racial demography,
became famous for developing the theory of the Aryan master race in his book: An Essay on the
Inequality of the Human Races (1853 – 1855). Gobineau came to believe that race created
culture, arguing that distinctions between the three races - “black,” “white,” and “yellow” - were
natural barriers, and that “race-mixing” breaks those barriers and leads to chaos. Gobineau
believed the white race was superior to the other races in the creation of civilized culture and in
maintaining ordered government.”21
Global apartheid and ethnic cleansing are also the driving force behind Napoleon Bonaparte’s
resolve to block forever the march of the Blacks in the world; behind Cecil John Rhodes’s secret
societies keen on gradually absorbing the wealth of the world;22 behind the French Nazi-inspired
financial system by way of which France deprives her prior African colonies of 440 billion euros
each year;23 and behind Dr. Henry A. Kissinger’s US foreign policy intended to depopulate the
so-called Third World Countries in order to arrogate the latter’s natural wealth and resources.
20 In The Papers of Benjamin Franklin, Vol. IV, Editor: Leonard W. Labaree, USA: 1753, p. 234. 21 David Livingstone, Black Terror, White Soldiers: Islam, Fascism, and the New Age, Sabilillah Publications, USA: 2013, p. 173. 22 The Quigley Formula, Dr. G. Edward Griffin’s lecture: https://youtu.be/ynVqPnMQ2sI 23 Deutsche Wirtschafts Nachrichten: https://deutsche-wirtschafts-nachrichten.de/2015/03/15/frankreich-kann-seinen-status-nur-mit-ausbeutung-der-ehemaligen-kolonien-halten/
12 | P a g e
Here is what came of Bonaparte’s heinous brain and soul:
“My decision to destroy the authority of the Blacks in Saint Domingue (Haiti) is not so much based
on considerations of commerce and money, as on the need to block forever the march of the
Blacks in the world.”24
In the first of his seven wills, Cecil Rhodes called for the creation of a secret society fully devoted
to the purpose not only of gradually absorbing the wealth of the world25, but also of extending
the British rule all over the world. Here is the exact wording of his will:
To and for the establishment, promotion and development of a Secret Society, the true aim and
object whereof shall be for the extension of British rule throughout the world, the perfecting of a
system of emigration from the United Kingdom, and of colonisation by British subjects of all lands
where the means of livelihood are attainable by energy, labour and enterprise, and especially
the occupation by British settlers of the entire Continent of Africa, the Holy Land, the Valley of
the Euphrates, the Islands of Cyprus and Candia, the whole of South America, the Islands of the
Pacific not heretofore possessed by Great Britain, the whole of the Malay Archipelago, the
seaboard of China and Japan, the ultimate recovery of the United States of America as an
integral part of the British Empire, the inauguration of a system of Colonial representation in the
Imperial Parliament which may tend to weld together the disjointed members of the Empire and,
finally, the foundation of so great a Power as to render wars impossible, and promote the best
interests of humanity.26
On 6 September 2019 the Russian Foreign Ministry reminded the international community of the
partial annihilation of the Congolese people by the Belgian King Leopold II.27 In the so-called
“Congo Free State” (1890s), at least 20 million Africans were slayed by King Leopold II before
there was even a word for genocide. Millions had their hands severed for failing to meet the
demands of the racially biased King Leopold II. Women were sexually assaulted and brutally
mutilated; children were stolen from their parents and taken to be groomed as a colonial army.
Regardless of the fact that he massacred millions of Africans to arrogate their properties, Cecil
John Rhodes, founder of the De Beers Group (“mining and trading of diamonds”), was awarded
the honorific style of The Right Honorable. This shows the worth of the black-skinned human beings
in the eyes of Western imperialists with their White supremacism. The Charter of Imperialism with
reference to Third World Countries, which was secretly renegotiated in Yalta (1945) by Churchill,
Stalin, and Roosevelt, is actually the main legal instrument of the present Yalta World Order.28
24 Joseph E. Baptiste, Website: Toussaint Louverture Historical Society, http://toussaintlouverturehs.org/quotes.htm 25 See The New York Times of April 9, 1902: “Mr. Rhodes’s Ideal of Anglo-Saxon Greatness; Statement of His Aims, Written for W.T. Stead in 1890. He believed a Wealthy Secret Society Should Work to Secure the World’s Peace and a British-American Federation.” 26 Robert Rotberg, The Founder: Cecil Rhodes and the Pursuit of Power, Oxford University Press: 1988, pp. 101, 102. Also Niall Ferguson, The House of Rothschild: The World’s Banker, 1848–1998, (Penguin Books, 2000). Billie Barnes Jensen, Philip Dru: The blueprint of a Presidential Adviser, American Studies, Vol. XII, No. 1: Spring 1971. Henry Makow, The US is a “Crown” Financial Colony, http://www.savethemales.ca/001020.html 27 Russia Foreign Ministry, https://web.facebook.com/MIDRussia/posts/1969259789840119 28 The Charter of Imperialism: https://cabindapeoplesvoicehome.files.wordpress.com/2019/05/imperialism-charter-concerning-third-world-countries.pdf
13 | P a g e
Can Interest unite Africans?
It is in the best interest of African countries and peoples to fully enjoy all the rights conferred on
them by the UN GA Resolution 1803 (XVII) of 14 December 1962, on the topic of the permanent
sovereignty of peoples and nations over their own natural wealth and resources; and Resolution
1514 (XV) of 14 December 1960, concerning the Declaration on the Granting of Independence
to Colonial Countries and Peoples. Self-determination, self-defense, and self-respect is similarly
Africa’s interest, consistent with the 1966 International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
The Charter of Imperialism, i.e. the Yalta World Order, is meant to defeat pro-self-government
all over the world; to prevent and disrupt any development achievement in African countries; to
keep Africa in underdevelopment, poverty, division, wars, and chaos so as to dominate, misuse,
and ransack its natural resources; and, pursuant to the “golden rule” of the Charter of Imperialism,
to attain the physical liquidation of nationalist leaders and rulers of the Third World. To end this
war against Africans, which the “Charter” entails, Africa needs a unified and powerful army.
Africa is rich enough to begin with an annual expenditure on a comprehensive African security
system (self-defense, food safety, and health security) of between 200 and 300 billion euros.
The danger threatening the survival of black-skinned people all over the world is big enough to
justify the necessity for a unified and powerful African army. It is undeniable that Russia and the
other protagonists29 of the 1955 Asian-African (Bandung) Conference are better placed to play
a vital role in the construction of a unified and powerful Africa Self-Defense Forces.
440 billion euros is the value of the natural resources French “former” African colonies are yearly
divested of by France, ever since French president Charles de Gaulle forced the aforementioned
Nazi-inspired financial system following WWII. African heads of State who have so far dared
to contest the asphyxiating French financial system have either been murdered or ousted in brutal
military coups.30 Such is the fate of pro-self-government and upright African leaders and rulers,
as called for in Article 26 of the Western Charter of Imperialism.
The subscribers to the Yalta World Order have succeeded in getting a bigger say within African
Union, inasmuch as Western governments and financial institutions have become the contributors
of up to sixty percent of African Union’s annual budget. As example, African Union’s full budget
for 2016 amounted to US $416,867,326 million; sixty percent of this sum, i.e. US $247,033,986
million approximately, was secured from “International Partners”. It is dishonorable that Africa’s
highest governmental organization, i.e. AU, depends on Western “donors” to such an extent.31
29 Afghanistan, Burma, Cambodia, Egypt, Ethiopia, China, Ghana, India, Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Japan, Jordan, Laos, Lebanon, Liberia, Libya, Nepal, Pakistan, Philippines, Saudi Arabia, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Syria, Thailand, Turkey, Vietnam, Yemen. 30 Former French Foreign Minister Roland Dumas in an interview with l’Humanité, by Dr. Christof Lehmann, in New Eastern Outlook: https://journal-neo.org/2014/09/22/will-france-and-germany-challenge-nato/ 31 Southern African Legal Information Institute, Decision on the Budget of the African Union for the 2016 Financial Year – Doc. Assembly/AU/3(XXV) – Decision No: Assembly/AU/Dec. 577(XXV), 2015.
14 | P a g e
According to Dr. Rath Health Foundation, The European Union is controlled by corporate interests
whose chief goal is to conquer the world using political, economic and—if necessary—military force.
Towards this end, they are systematically destroying the democratic legal system in all regions of
the world, including Africa, and are replacing it with Nazi-fascist dictatorial law.32 Yet, in order to
re-conquer Africa, and exhaustively get rid of its natives, Russia and the other Bandung Nations
must necessarily be bullied on a daily basis and/or wrecked beforehand.
A unified, powerful, and modern African Army―Africa Ground Self-Defense Force, Africa Air
Self-Defense Force, Africa Maritime Self-Defense Force―is in the best interest of Africa inasmuch
as it rapidly solves the problem of unemployment on the African continent, and, all at once, puts
an end to the flight of human capital, chiefly young people of working age, to Western Europe.
A unified and powerful African army is destined to prevent the recurrence in Africa of slavery,
slave trade, colonial domination, apartheid, foreign instigated hostilities, and debt-trap diplomacy.
Concluding Observations
As far as Africa is concerned, President Putin’s Russia is a trustworthy Russia. Bearing this in mind,
in February 2013, the Cabindan National Movement (CNM) exhorted President Vladimir Putin to
sponsor an “international conference on the present condition and future prospects of the Congo
basin and Africa.” CNM wanted the Conference to originate an economic plan likely to reconcile
the dependence of Western Europe’s very existence on African natural resources and the right
of African children to live prosperous lives thanks to their respective countries’ raw materials.
The Conference failed to take place, and CNM hopes that the Russia-Africa Summit and Economic
Forum 2019 to be hosted by Sochi will consider the need for a mutual understanding between
Africa and Western Europe. In this connection, CNM expects Russia to consider the cries of pain
that rise up from Cabinda, and also take into consideration CNM’s request to be heard by the
UN Special Political and Decolonization Committee, i.e. 4th Committee, so that the decolonization
process of Cabinda is eventually brought to a successful conclusion.33
Mr. President, thank you very much for your time, and your help in the above matters.
Yours faithfully,
Bartolomeu Capita (Mr.)
Joint-Presidency, Cabindan National Movement
32 Dr. Rath Health Foundation, The Nazi Roots of the ‘Brussels EU’: What You Always Wanted to Know about the ‘Brussels EU’—But No One Dared to Tell You, Germany: 2010, pp. 19, 28. 33 CNM Request to UN Fourth Committee: https://cabindacitizenship.files.wordpress.com/2019/09/request-to-special-political-and-decolonization-4th-committee.pdf
15 | P a g e
The philanthropic mission of the Belgian King
Leopold II consisted in murdering millions of
Africans and severing the hands of millions.
If all these humiliations can’t unite Africans to
the point of creating a continental army meant
to provide Africans with security, nothing will.
Back Cover