presented by paul gibbons

8
Construction Clinic 23 Concurrent Delay Presented by Paul Gibbons

Upload: others

Post on 16-Nov-2021

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Presented by Paul Gibbons

Construction Clinic 23

Concurrent Delay

Presented byPaul Gibbons

Page 2: Presented by Paul Gibbons

CONCURRENT DELAY

“A Period of project overrun which is caused by two or more effective causes of delay

which are of approximately equal causative potency”

Concurrent Delay by John Marrin QC (2002), 18 Const LJ No. 6 436.

• True concurrency rare.

• However opposing expert will nearly always raise alternative causes of delay to negate

and cast doubt over the EOT / L&E entitlement.

• Complicated by the SCL Protocol providing two alternative views on concurrency (see

para 10.7 to 10.10).

Page 3: Presented by Paul Gibbons

THE ORTHODOX APPROACH TO CONCURRENCY

• Malmaison, etc:

Two concurrent delaysRelevant Event – Exceptionally Inclement WeatherContractor Delay – Shortage of Labour

1 week EOT due to the Contractor (5 working days)5 working day

concurrent delay

Page 4: Presented by Paul Gibbons

THE ALTERNATIVE (NEW) APPROACH

• Royal Brompton, Adyard, Jerram Falkus, Saga Cruises:

Contractor Delay –Shortage of Labour causing 10 days delay

10 day contractor delay

Contractor Culpable delay

Page 5: Presented by Paul Gibbons

THE ALTERNATIVE (NEW) APPROACH

• Royal Brompton, Adyard, Jerram Falkus, Saga Cruises:Relevant Event–Variation to Steelwork occurs slightly later but equally delaying

Relevant Event–Variation to Steelwork extends beyond the Contractor Delay

Concurrent delay – The completion date is delayed further than that already delayed

10 day contractor delay

5 day employer delay

10 day delay remains

No Concurrent delay –The completion date is not delayed any further than already delayed

Page 6: Presented by Paul Gibbons

• Delaying act must affect the critical path.

• Delaying act must cause actual delay to the progress of the works.

• Delaying act must prevent contractor from achieving an earlier completion date. If

earlier completion date would not have been met (due to contractor delay), then no

concurrency exists.

• First event problem – Will new approach prevent parties from raising issues, whilst awaiting

the other side’s delay to materialise?

• Concurrency argument often won on the factual evidence rather than from the delay analysis

itself.

• Pragmatic Approach is required

CONCURRENT DELAY - SUMMARY

Page 7: Presented by Paul Gibbons

QUESTIONS

QUESTIONS?

Page 8: Presented by Paul Gibbons

CONTACT DETAILS

TELL ME MORE

To learn more about the ICCP please visit: www.instituteccp.com.

For general enquiries please contact Nina Hewitt-Tyrrell: [email protected].

For membership specific enquiries please contact: [email protected].