presentation_file_5172a0a5-8b08-497e-8466-061bac1008a6

Upload: innoventurecommunity

Post on 03-Apr-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/28/2019 presentation_file_5172a0a5-8b08-497e-8466-061bac1008a6

    1/10

    4/20/2013 1

    Click to edit Master title style

    4/20/2013 1

  • 7/28/2019 presentation_file_5172a0a5-8b08-497e-8466-061bac1008a6

    2/10

    4/20/2013 2

    1. $ 1 Billion to get a drug to market

    2. 15 years to develop and get approved

    3. 20 year Patent Life = 5 years of protected sales

    Novel Target

    Validation

    LeadOptimization

    Pre ClinicalDevelopment

    Clinical

    Development

    How we Help

    1. Lower Cost(less Man-hours)

    2. Reduce Failure Rate

    3. Time Saver(Extends Patent life)

    4. Increase Probability

    of Success

  • 7/28/2019 presentation_file_5172a0a5-8b08-497e-8466-061bac1008a6

    3/10

    4/20/2013 3

    1. Novel Target

    Validation

    2. Lead

    Optimization

    3. Pre-Clinical

    Development

    4. Clinical

    Development

    FDA Approval

    5. Sales $$$

    Billion Dollar

    Market

    Develop Compound

    Identify Indication

    Safety/Tolerability

    Feasibility

    Animal Testing

    Formulation

    Clinical Trials

    IND Filing

    Compound

    Repositioning

    2 -4 years

    75% Failure Rate

    10% of cost

    1-3 years

    80% Failure Rate

    15% of cost

    1-2 years

    67% Failure Rate

    25% of cost

    6- 8 years

    80% Failure Rate

    50 % of cost

    15 years

    $1 Billion

    Success = 1/10,000

    nFlow

    Chemically Aware

    nFlow

    Chemically Aware

    nFlow

    nFlow

    Chemically Aware

    Compound Repositioning

    Stage Outcomes StatsProduct

    InteractionsAfter BlueAtom

    1-3 Months

    60 % Failure Rate

    5 % of cost

    6-9 Months

    65 % Failure Rate

    7.5 % of cost

    5 -12 Months

    52 % Failure Rate

    12.5% of cost

    (Potential)

    10 years

    $750 Million

    Success =

    1500/10,000

    6- 8 years

    80% Failure Rate

    75 % of cost

  • 7/28/2019 presentation_file_5172a0a5-8b08-497e-8466-061bac1008a6

    4/10

    4/20/2013 4

    Differentiation Result Stage Interaction

    Chemical Structure Search

    (Optical Structure Recognition)

    Compound

    Likeness/Competitive

    Stage 1

    Compound Repositioning Therapeutic Indication based

    on best probability

    Stage 2 4

    Technology: Database Driven Application that sits on MS SharePoint (Industry leading

    collaboration tool)

    Differentiation Result Stage Interaction

    Business Process Workflow

    Automation

    Automates

    Safety/Tolerability/Feasibility

    modeling and lab data readout

    Stage 2 & 3

    Competitive Intelligence Uses Publicly Available dataincluding FDA and Publication

    sites

    Stage 2

    Consensus Scoring Identifies Most Viable

    compounds for targeted

    indications

    Stage 2

    Technology: Data Warehouse Driven Dashboard

    Year 3 revenues = $7,382,500

    Customer Count = 10 new | 13 renewals

    Year 3 revenues = $1,614,375 (net discounts)

    Customer Count = 32 new | 40 renewals

  • 7/28/2019 presentation_file_5172a0a5-8b08-497e-8466-061bac1008a6

    5/10

    4/20/2013 5

    Product Company SubStructure

    Search

    Compound

    Reposition

    Compound

    Screening

    Deficiencies

    Chem4SharePoint Scigillence Yes No No Inefficient, No integration

    with other products

    Search Genius Perkin Elmer Yes No No High Priced tag

    SharePoint WebPart Accelrys No No No Static searches, inconclusive

    results

    Key Points: Compound Screening and Repositioning,

    Third party integration, Patented Algorithm

    Key Points: Consensus Scoring, fully integrated to

    environment

    Product Company Assay

    Workflow

    Consensus

    Scoring

    Third Party/Lab

    Integration

    Deficiencies

    In-House

    Application

    Large pharma No No Specific to

    products owned

    by company

    High development costs,

    development dependent on

    Success

    HEOS Accelrys Yes No No Service based, Web only

  • 7/28/2019 presentation_file_5172a0a5-8b08-497e-8466-061bac1008a6

    6/10

    4/20/2013 6

    15 % Big Pharma (GSK, Merck, Pfizer, J&J)

    9% Medium Pharma ( Targacept, Allergan, Etc.)

    76% Small Pharma (Start-ups, emerging)

    Roche

    Genentech

    Eisai

    Cleveland Clinic

    Demo

    Complete

    or potential

    lead

    H3Biomed

    AMBIn discussions

    nFlow

    Chemically Aware

    ASINEX In discussionsnFlow

    Chemically Aware

    nFlow

    Chemically Aware

    % Type Components

    20 Direct Sales Sales

    Training

    Implementation (services)80 Channel Partner (Perkin Elmer, Pharmica, Dell)

  • 7/28/2019 presentation_file_5172a0a5-8b08-497e-8466-061bac1008a6

    7/10

    4/20/2013 7

    POC in non-NNR/CNS pharmaceutical company

    Acceptance of Grant submissions by NIH and HHS for continued

    development of product capabilities

    Collaboration Partnerships with complementary product integrate

    additional functionality

    Funding by investor to retain and hire key personnel

  • 7/28/2019 presentation_file_5172a0a5-8b08-497e-8466-061bac1008a6

    8/10

    4/20/2013 8

    Developers with Mobility and Cloud experience

    Collaboration partners to validate results and peer review

    product capabilities

    Wide adoption of the technologies which will enable faster

    results and streamline the products

  • 7/28/2019 presentation_file_5172a0a5-8b08-497e-8466-061bac1008a6

    9/10

    4/20/2013 9

    Industry is researching the problem for resolution

    Large academia pool of computational chemists and biological

    modelers to pull from

    Federal Government funding opportunities of this nature to

    solve the cost, time and success of drug discovery

    Application goes beyond drugs to auto, biofuel and bioenergy

    industries

  • 7/28/2019 presentation_file_5172a0a5-8b08-497e-8466-061bac1008a6

    10/10

    4/20/2013 10

    Name Position Experience

    Miles Romello

    CISSP, CISRC

    CEO/CTO 20 Yrs. IT (Hands on & leadership)

    Wachovia (Corporate Information Security Manager)

    Targacept (Sr. Director Information Technology)

    Former CEO for Startup Internet Caf (90s)

    ChandraHolcomb VP Operations 15 years in IT leadership and operationsTargacept

    Womble Carlyle

    Litera Corp.

    Kartik

    Tallapragada

    Phd Candidate

    Software

    Development

    Masters in Information Systems

    Innovator of Blue Atom Technology

    10 years Development Experience

    PublishedDr. David

    Kombo, Phd

    Computationa

    l Chemistry

    23 years Life Sciences

    Published

    Tied to numerous patents

    Mauri Hodges

    CPA, CCP

    Board

    Chairman

    Executive in Targacept for 15 years

    Former CEO for software development company

    Experience with start-up companies, venture funding, IPO

    and acquisitions