presentation.competition law.2008.eng.julijaj
DESCRIPTION
Basic principles of Latvian competition lawTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Presentation.competition law.2008.eng.julijaj](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060200/559922d81a28ab155e8b462b/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Basic principles of Latvian competition law
![Page 2: Presentation.competition law.2008.eng.julijaj](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060200/559922d81a28ab155e8b462b/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Plan
1. Principles, aims and history of competition law
2. Competition Council and its powers
3. Prohibited Agreements
4. When the agreement is prohibited
5. Liability
6. Amendments to the Competition Law
2
![Page 3: Presentation.competition law.2008.eng.julijaj](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060200/559922d81a28ab155e8b462b/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Part one: General
• Principles, aims and history of competition law
• Some basic concepts
3
![Page 4: Presentation.competition law.2008.eng.julijaj](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060200/559922d81a28ab155e8b462b/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
…
Adam Smith (1723 – 1790), philosopher and political economist
• Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (1776).
“People of the same trade seldom meet together, .. But the conversation ends in a conspiracy against the public, or in some contrivance to raise prices."
4
![Page 5: Presentation.competition law.2008.eng.julijaj](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060200/559922d81a28ab155e8b462b/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Competition law in Latvia?
• 90s – The goal is to join the EC
• 1999 – First try
• 2002 – The new law
• Why Europe needs competition law?
5
![Page 6: Presentation.competition law.2008.eng.julijaj](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060200/559922d81a28ab155e8b462b/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Objectives
• Promotion of competition in the market -• Ensuring independent activity of each market participant
• Restricting the creation or abuse of the market power
•Aims:• lower prices
• better quality
• Broader choice
• More innovations
6
![Page 7: Presentation.competition law.2008.eng.julijaj](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060200/559922d81a28ab155e8b462b/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Pillars of competition law
1. Prohibition of anti competitive agreements
2. Prohibition of abuse of the dominant position
3. Merger control
4. Control of state aid
7
![Page 8: Presentation.competition law.2008.eng.julijaj](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060200/559922d81a28ab155e8b462b/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Applicable laws and other sources
• EU law
• Latvian laws:• Competition Law (in force since January 2002)
• Regulations of the Cabinet of Ministers
8
![Page 9: Presentation.competition law.2008.eng.julijaj](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060200/559922d81a28ab155e8b462b/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Market participants
• Any natural or legal person• Legal persons: whole group
• Also self-employed, individual merchants
• Associations of market participants
• Criteria:• Is engaged or is preparing to engage in the economic
activities in Latvia
• Economic activities: any sales of goods/provision of anyservices (except for public services)
9
![Page 10: Presentation.competition law.2008.eng.julijaj](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060200/559922d81a28ab155e8b462b/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Relevant market
• Purpose of relevant market definition • to identify the competitors, consumers, customers of the
respective market participants
• to determine the boundaries within which the market participants are competing or are situated in circumstances where they can compete
• Definition of the relevant market. Two Pillars:• Product market
• Geographic market
10
![Page 11: Presentation.competition law.2008.eng.julijaj](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060200/559922d81a28ab155e8b462b/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Product market
• Substitution
• Demand
• Supply
• Barriers
• Key: “specific features of the product and its utilisation characteristics”
11
![Page 12: Presentation.competition law.2008.eng.julijaj](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060200/559922d81a28ab155e8b462b/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Geographic market
• Substitution
• Barriers
• Imports
• Key: “appreciably different conditions”
12
![Page 13: Presentation.competition law.2008.eng.julijaj](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060200/559922d81a28ab155e8b462b/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Part two: Competition authorities
• Structure
• Rights (obligations)?
13
![Page 14: Presentation.competition law.2008.eng.julijaj](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060200/559922d81a28ab155e8b462b/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
What’s in its name?
• Competition Council = Konkurences padome
• www.kp.gov.lv
• Chairperson of the Council Ms. Ieva Jaunzeme
• Executive body - the Bureau
14
![Page 15: Presentation.competition law.2008.eng.julijaj](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060200/559922d81a28ab155e8b462b/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
What do they do?
• Investigations and market studies
• Breach cases
• Mergers
• New laws: review/opinions
15
![Page 16: Presentation.competition law.2008.eng.julijaj](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060200/559922d81a28ab155e8b462b/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Powers – general overview
• Information request • For a very wide range of objectives• The necessary information including the commercial
secret
• Rights are very wide
• Limitations to the rights - there are no direct norms of the law
• Procedural preconditions - powers of attorneys, court decisions
• Forced enforcement, money fines
16
![Page 17: Presentation.competition law.2008.eng.julijaj](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060200/559922d81a28ab155e8b462b/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Dawn raids
• Broad powers of investigation
• The inspection may take place with or without prior warning
• The inspections without warning are called "dawn raids"
• Only the powers stipulated by the law• European Commission - Regulation No 1/2003• Competition Council - Competition Law (new since 2002)
• Little practice at application of the law
17
![Page 18: Presentation.competition law.2008.eng.julijaj](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060200/559922d81a28ab155e8b462b/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Documents to be presented
• Power of attorney
• ID
• Court decision
• Decision of the head of the bureau
18
![Page 19: Presentation.competition law.2008.eng.julijaj](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060200/559922d81a28ab155e8b462b/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Powers of the CC during dawn raids
• Access to the company and employees' premises/property (including transport vehicles)
• Rights to open storage facilities • Examination of the company and its employees' property• Rights to demand explanations• Receive copies, remove originals/property• Seal the premises, transport vehicles, storehouses
19
![Page 20: Presentation.competition law.2008.eng.julijaj](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060200/559922d81a28ab155e8b462b/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
When they come – what to do?
• To think of:
• Your lawyer (whatever time of the day)
• What you have done/written
• Fines
• Cooperate
• Be polite but strict. Keep the investigation under control
• Set up a team for representation of the company at the investigation
• Inform all the employees
• Keep precise copies of the information acquired by the investigators
• Accompany the investigators continuously
• Put down the questions and answers
20
![Page 21: Presentation.competition law.2008.eng.julijaj](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060200/559922d81a28ab155e8b462b/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Rights of the company during the raid
• Rights in relation to the protected information: • "confidentiality" mark
• Limits of the investigated case
• "Legal privilege" or the confidentiality of the lawyer's correspondence
21
![Page 22: Presentation.competition law.2008.eng.julijaj](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060200/559922d81a28ab155e8b462b/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Part three: Agreements
• The rule
• „Agreement”
• Prohibited agreements –black list
• Horizontal and vertical agreements
22
![Page 23: Presentation.competition law.2008.eng.julijaj](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060200/559922d81a28ab155e8b462b/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
The rule
•Agreements with an object or effect of hindrance, restriction or distortion of competition in the territory of Latvia are prohibited and void from the moment of conclusion between market participants
• Principle of invalidity of the agreement
• Object or effect?
• Agreement
23
![Page 24: Presentation.competition law.2008.eng.julijaj](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060200/559922d81a28ab155e8b462b/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Hindrance, Restriction or Distortion of Competition
•Test:•Object or effect?
• It is enough that competition can be potentially hindered, restricted or distorted
•"Affected market"•Horizontal/Vertical•Relevant product market• Relevant geographical market
24
![Page 25: Presentation.competition law.2008.eng.julijaj](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060200/559922d81a28ab155e8b462b/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Agreement I
• “Traditional” agreement• It does not have to be a written document
• Does not have to be binding (also gentlemen's agreement)
• Does not have to be fulfilled
• But has to be concluded between "independent entities" (that is, does notrelate to mutual agreements between parent and subsidiary companies)
25
![Page 26: Presentation.competition law.2008.eng.julijaj](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060200/559922d81a28ab155e8b462b/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Agreement II
• Decisions of associations of undertakings:
• Recommendations, common standards, models of action
• The form and legal consequences bear no significance, theparticipant’s attitude towards such decisions is important
• Concerted practices:
• Without arrangement - the market participants does not inform eachother about their activities
• Type of company coordination, which - wihthout knowingly set out ina form of an agreement, threatens the competition, includes practicalcooperation of companies
26
![Page 27: Presentation.competition law.2008.eng.julijaj](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060200/559922d81a28ab155e8b462b/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Prohibited agreements - "black list"
• Agreements, which:• Directly or indirectly fix prices for purchase or sale, or any other
trading conditions;• Restrict or control production, markets, technical development, or
investments;• Divides markets or sources of supply;• Applies unequal provisions in equivalent transactions with third
persons, creating for them disadvantageous conditions in terms of competition;
• Make the conclusion of contracts subject to acceptance by the other parties of supplementary obligations which by their nature or according to commercial usage have no connection with the subject of such contracts.
27
![Page 28: Presentation.competition law.2008.eng.julijaj](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060200/559922d81a28ab155e8b462b/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Exchange of information
• European Commission in case of IFTRA Rules on Glass Containers:
• It is contrary to provisions of Article 81 that the producercontacts his competitors in relation to significantelements of his price policy, for example, pricelists,discounts and sale conditions applied by him, rates anddates, when they are changed, and special exceptions,which he can award to specific clients
28
![Page 29: Presentation.competition law.2008.eng.julijaj](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060200/559922d81a28ab155e8b462b/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Is "information" illegal?
• Life in information vacuum?
• Operation in full independence from competitors?
• Special case - oligopoly [for example, fuel market]
29
![Page 30: Presentation.competition law.2008.eng.julijaj](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060200/559922d81a28ab155e8b462b/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Agreements on Prices
• Nintendo case
• Vitamin Cartel
30
![Page 31: Presentation.competition law.2008.eng.julijaj](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060200/559922d81a28ab155e8b462b/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Market and/or client division
• Purpose of market and/or customer division is to provide the members of a cartel with a possibility to maintain an artificially dominant or even monopoly position in a definite geographical territory.
31
![Page 32: Presentation.competition law.2008.eng.julijaj](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060200/559922d81a28ab155e8b462b/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Other examples
• "The distributor undertakes to purchase Goods only form theProducer"
• "Within the premises of the Distributor, only the Producer's goodsare allowed for sale"
• "Opening of every new sales place by the Distributor shall becoordinated with the Producer"
• "The Parties have agreed that the Distributor shall be the exclusivedistributor of the Producer in the Territory"
• "During the term of this Agreement the Seller will not involve inactive sale of Goods within the Territory"
• Appendix XXX to the agreement between YYY and ZZZ “retail price”
32
![Page 33: Presentation.competition law.2008.eng.julijaj](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060200/559922d81a28ab155e8b462b/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Horizontal and vertical agreements
• Horizontal agreements:• An aggrement is concluded or concerted practices are
practiced between companies, which are active in the same level of the market [competitors]
• Vertical agreement:• Agreements which are concluded between companies
which are active in various levels of production or supply chain
33
![Page 34: Presentation.competition law.2008.eng.julijaj](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060200/559922d81a28ab155e8b462b/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Vertical agreements
• The competition may be limited:
• among various brands (inter-brand competition) or
• competition between the distributors of goods of one and the same brand (inter-brand competition).
• Most harmful agreements to the competition are those agreements which influence the inter-brand competition, rather than between the distributors.
• However, limitations to the intra-brand competition can be harmful in case the inter-brand competition is limited at the same time.
34
![Page 35: Presentation.competition law.2008.eng.julijaj](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060200/559922d81a28ab155e8b462b/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Horizontal agreements
• Members of a cartel engage in cartels in order to be able to rely on their existing market share, on the existing clients and they do not need to offer new or better products for competitive prices. Accordingly, the consumer loses because he pays more for goods of worse quality.
• Price fixing if it is only a purpose or recommendation influences thecompetition because as a result of such decision, all participants canforesee with a reasonable degree of certainty what price policy will beadopted by their competitors, especially if the fixing of a target price isaccompanied by a possibility of control and sanction.
35
![Page 36: Presentation.competition law.2008.eng.julijaj](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060200/559922d81a28ab155e8b462b/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Part four: when the agreement is prohibited
• Exemptions from the prohibition
• De minimis
36
![Page 37: Presentation.competition law.2008.eng.julijaj](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060200/559922d81a28ab155e8b462b/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Exemptions
• Agreement may be allowed or allowed on conditions for a definiteterm if
• the agreement promotes improvement of goods production orsale, or the economic progress and therefore
• ensures benefit for the consumer, besides
• these agreements do not impose limitations to the respectivemarket participants, which are not necessary for reachingthese aims and
• avoids the possibility to eliminate competition in a significantrelevant market share.
37
![Page 38: Presentation.competition law.2008.eng.julijaj](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060200/559922d81a28ab155e8b462b/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
De minimis
• Agreements which cannot significantly harm the competition:• Agreements between companies which operate in one
level of manufacture or distribution (horizontalagreement) if the joint market share of the both/allparties in the relevant market does not exceed 10%
• Agreements between companies which operate indifferent levels of manufacture or distribution (verticalagreement) if the market share of the contracting party inthe relevant market does not exceed 15%
38
![Page 39: Presentation.competition law.2008.eng.julijaj](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060200/559922d81a28ab155e8b462b/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Part five: Liability
• Penalties
• Leniency
39
![Page 40: Presentation.competition law.2008.eng.julijaj](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060200/559922d81a28ab155e8b462b/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Penalties
•Competitors – 10%
•Non-competitors – 5%
•Civil liability
40
![Page 41: Presentation.competition law.2008.eng.julijaj](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060200/559922d81a28ab155e8b462b/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Leniency
• What is leniency policy?• Allows the company to cooperate with the authority during the
or even to initiate it• “Whistle-blowers" L
• Aim – destabilization of cartels
• Consequences:• Reduction of/exemption from penalty
• Does not influence the civil liability
41
![Page 42: Presentation.competition law.2008.eng.julijaj](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060200/559922d81a28ab155e8b462b/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Part six: Amendments
• History
• Process
• Result
• Consequences
42
![Page 43: Presentation.competition law.2008.eng.julijaj](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060200/559922d81a28ab155e8b462b/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Just to reiterate….
• History
• Process
43
![Page 44: Presentation.competition law.2008.eng.julijaj](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060200/559922d81a28ab155e8b462b/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Part 2 of Clause 13
• A market participant or several market participants are in adominant position in retail, if:• they, taking into account their buyer power and dependence ofthe suppliers in the relevant market,
• have the capacity to directly or indirectly apply or impose unfairand unjustified provisions, conditions, or payments upon thesuppliers, and
• have the capacity to hinder, restrict or distort competition in anyrelevant market within the territory of Latvia for a substantiallength of time.
44
![Page 45: Presentation.competition law.2008.eng.julijaj](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060200/559922d81a28ab155e8b462b/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Prohibition
• Any market participant holding a dominant position in retail is prohibited from abusing such position in the territory of Latvia.
45
![Page 46: Presentation.competition law.2008.eng.julijaj](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060200/559922d81a28ab155e8b462b/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Abuse I
• imposition or application of unfair and unjustified provisions regarding the return of the goods, unless the returned goods are: • Goods of bad quality,
• New goods, which were not previously known to the consumers provided that the increased supplies thereof were initiated by the supplier
46
![Page 47: Presentation.competition law.2008.eng.julijaj](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060200/559922d81a28ab155e8b462b/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Abuse II
• imposition or application of unfair and unjustified payments for thepresence of the delivered goods at a retail sales point, unless suchpayments are justifiable as marketing costs for new products, whichwere not previously known to the consumers;
47
![Page 48: Presentation.competition law.2008.eng.julijaj](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060200/559922d81a28ab155e8b462b/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Abuse III
• imposition or application of unfair and unjustified payments inexchange for entering into a contract, unless such payments arejustifiable as costs for entering into a contract with a new supplier,which therefore requires special evaluation;
48
![Page 49: Presentation.competition law.2008.eng.julijaj](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060200/559922d81a28ab155e8b462b/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Abuse IV
• imposition or application of unfair and unjustified payments inexchange for delivery of goods to a new, yet-to-be-opened retailpoint of sale;
49
![Page 50: Presentation.competition law.2008.eng.julijaj](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060200/559922d81a28ab155e8b462b/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Abuse V
• imposition or application of unfair and unjustifiably long paymentperiods for delivered goods.
50
![Page 51: Presentation.competition law.2008.eng.julijaj](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060200/559922d81a28ab155e8b462b/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
Abuse VI
• imposition or application of unfair and unjustifiable sanctions for thebreach of the agreement.
51
![Page 52: Presentation.competition law.2008.eng.julijaj](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060200/559922d81a28ab155e8b462b/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
Consequences / conclusions
• It depends….
52
![Page 53: Presentation.competition law.2008.eng.julijaj](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060200/559922d81a28ab155e8b462b/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
Thank you!Jūlija JerņevaMob: +371 29131597https://www.linkedin.com/in/julijajerneva