presentation to imc - teamlead.duke-nus.edu.sg€¦ · 1 our history year 2000: singapore’s...
TRANSCRIPT
0
1
Our History Year 2000: Singapore’s initiative to be THE biomedical hub in Asia Year 2005: Agreement signed Year 2007: Pioneer class starts school Year 2011: First Class Graduates Recruiting for 6th intake in 2012
2
Our Education Mission Duke-NUS Medical School
Science Knowledge Communication
Medical Practice Improve Medical Practice
Critical thinking Teamwork Creative
thinking
Leadership Professionalism & Ethics
Research
Clinical Experience
3
1st year
2nd year
3rd year
4th year
1st year
2nd year
3rd year
4th year
Research Clinical
Basic Science
Clinical
Basic Science
Duke & Duke-NUS Typical US MD Program
Duke/Duke-NUS MD vs. Conventional MD
4
“The learning process can be divided into the accumulation of bits of information (memory) and the movement of these bits into patterns (thinking)…
The compulsive learner is incapable of thinking. There is
always another bit to be memorized and, if they are all learned, there is little time to rearrange the bits. It is also clear that without any bits there is no thinking.
The hardest theoretic question in educational circles is
the determination of the optimum number of bits for the most effective manipulation.”
Eugene Stead, MD Chairman, Department of Medicine Duke University School of Medicine
5
PLANNING THE CURRICULUM
6
Students have changed
7
Retention: 1st 10 mins: 70% last 10 mins: 20%
(McKeachie, 1986)
Paying attention: 40% (Pollio 1984)
8
Patient care is a team effort
9
15,000-17,000 medical journals!!!
15,000 to 17,000
10
Forgetting curve
Hermann Ebbinghaus (1850-1909)
11
Studies of Learning and Forgetting Ebbinghaus, Über das Gedächtnis (About memory), 1885
Retention, is exponentially related to time, t, and strength, S:
12
Cognitive Learning Theory
• Learning is not transfer of info into an empty vessel
13
What Faculty Wanted Engaged Students - Asking Questions
14
Reinforcement of Content with Media
15
Teams in Discussion
Teamwork, Creative and Critical Thinking
16
• Efficient use of Faculty time • Duke and Local faculty partnership
17
Learning as Fun
18
New Instructional Strategy:
TeamLEAD (Learn, Engage, Apply, Develop)
19
REALITY:
Exam
Pre-work Active Learning Homework
Wishful Thinking:
Pre-work Passive Lecture Study
TRADITIONAL
Before During After
Before During After
Exam
23
Before During After
Exam Video-taped
Lecture
Team Problem Solving
Review
TeamLEAD:
24
Group/Team Learning
Problem Based Learning
Collaborative Learning
Team Based Learning
25
Team-Based Learning TBL© is a teacher-directed strategy for incorporating
small-group active participation in large-group educational settings.
Definition
26
First Need to Form Teams…
• Principle: When forming teams, you want to ensure a distribution of resources and maximize participation of all members
• Operationalized: – Aim to identify important resources available to
individuals (background, degrees, experience) and equally distribute those individuals
– The teacher forms the teams – not students – 5-7 individuals per team
27
Components of TBL Sequence of Learning
28
Preparation Phase
All Possible Content
Core Principles
29
Components of TBL Sequence of Learning
IRAT
GRAT
30
Readiness Assurance Phase
All Possible Content
Sampling of Core for RAT
questions
31
32
Group Readiness Assessment
33
• Individual accountability promotes preparation • Group accountability promotes effective participation • Controversy stimulates discussion
Transform Groups to Teams Readiness Assurance Phase
34
Components Sequence of Learning
35
Application Phase
All Possible Content
Sample of Content/RAT
Application
36
Elements of Effective Application • Significant Problem • Same Problem • Specific Answer • Simultaneous Reporting
• Problems that require the brainpower of the whole Team to solve
• You want the ‘why’ for their answers
• Teams teaching Teams
The 4 S’s
37
Difference between Application and Readiness Assurance Questions
Lower Order Higher Order
IRAT Facts/Principles
Application Using & demonstrating knowledge & understanding
Number Questions
38
Application Phase
39
Backward Design
Problem to Solve, Principle to Apply in significant situation.
Where would they find the information – resources, content?
What key principles or facts do they need to know – in order to solve the problem? – how do you know they know it?
Application RATs Pre-work
40
Components Sequence of Learning
R. Levine
Peer Evaluation
41
“Guide on Side”
42
BUT….
• There is up-front work to do. Faculty : – Need to really understand what you want students to
be able to do with this information. – Need to define the appropriate pre class learning
activities – Faculty need to design appropriate RAT and
Application Questions (which is hard work) – Focus on what drives learning behavior
• Plus Faculty have to be willing to say “I don’t know” (there is nothing more scary than well prepared student).
43
And…..
• Some students will still prefer passive learning (it is hard work for them too). Faculty need to: – Prepare them for the experience – Provide sufficient time to do pre-work – Make sure the RATs and Applications are meaningful
and engaging – and they will appreciate the work • Students do prefer this type of group work over
typical small group activities – because everyone is involved.
44
When would you NOT use TBL?
• When you: – Don’t expect people to actually need to apply or use
the information you are giving them – Need individual assessments (like papers) and not
promoting team collaborations. – Don’t need everyone to be at the same level of
knowledge – Are giving inspiration talks, general info – Do not have sufficient time – Or the Faculty are not willing/prepared to do upfront
work
45
• “You need to lecture to “guarantee” students get all of the information,
• “Medical School is about memorization and lecturing is the best way for them to learn the material”
• Smart students can learn themselves (they don’t have to attend class – but in TBL they will be there and on time)
• Evidence doesn’t support the notion that lecturing is the best way to deliver large amounts of information to student
What we heard and what we learned:
46
• Team process “over-inflates” grades of lowest performers and holds back others
• Everyone’s learning is improved • They teach each other • Teamwork and language skills improve • Reduces isolation of students
What we heard and what we learned:
47
• “Students won’t learn if they have open book/internet” • It helps reinforce learning
What we heard and what we learned:
48
• “I won’t know if the students ‘really’ know anything because of team work masks individual performance.”
• The power of Why? – TBL permits effective facilitation enables you to understand students’ thinking processes more effectively than any passive lecture can.
What we heard and what we learned:
49
• “If they are having fun, they can’t be learning”
What we heard and what we learned:
50
For more info:
• www.youtube.com/insidedukenus • http://www.tblcollaborative.org
www.duke-nus.edu.sg