Academic Debate Teaches

Reading ComprehensionCritical Thinking

Organization SkillsEffective Communication

When debating, teams explore arguments for and against a specific proposition

Debating can be an effective and practical learning tool

Debating allows several different qualities to emerge, including

collecting and organizing ideas, evaluating ideas, seeing logical connections between ideas, adapting to new situations quickly and efficiently, and speaking persuasively.

As the audience is acting as a judge in the debate, the debaters should remember a few rules:

The debater should not deliver too many facts in a short time.

The debater should present the information to the audience as a completed work, not short facts glued together.

The language used in a debate must be intelligible, free of jargon and clichés.

The speech must be clear, well-organized, and informative

Good use of transitions is the key to a good debate.

Debate is controversial and controversy often becomes heated. However, trying to attack opponents gains nothing.

Debaters should display courtesy and show respect for opponents and for the worth of ideas at all times.

It is not realistic to take a "right or wrong" attitude toward debate.

Speakers should never forget that a good debate is an honest attempt to provide the audience with two different answers to the question asked in the proposition.

Students will be divided into two groups, each with 12 students. Each group will divide itself into two teams (6 members each): one team will

support the proposition (the affirmative team). The other team will oppose the proposition (the negative team).

When one group is debating, the members of the other group will act as judges. First, a member of the affirmative team will speak for 2 minutes after which s/he

will be cross-examined by three members of the negative team (one question each)(8m).

Next, a member of the negative team will also speak for 2 minutes and will also be cross-examined by three members of the opponent team (one question each)(8m).

A rebuttal will then take place, first by a member of the affirmative team talking for 2 minutes and them by a member of the negative teach also talking for 2 minutes (4m).

The audience will then have 5 minutes to ask questions to both teams (5m). Following that, a different member of each team will have 2 minutes to make a

closing statement, first a member from the affirmative group, then a member from the negative group (4m).

The audience will then vote to determine which team won the debate (1m).

The TOTAL TIME for the entire debate should be between 30 to 35 minutes as a few extra minutes will be spent for the transition between speakers.

How well did the speakers communicate their ideas?

How much information did the speakers know about their topic?

Were the team members polite? Did the second speaker on each team

build on what the first team member had said?

Consider…

SPEAKER 1

SPEAKER 2

SPEAKER 3

CROSS-EXAMINE

R 1

CROSS-EXAMINE

R 2

CROSS-EXAMINE

R 3

CLARITY

PRESENTATION

INFORMATION

ORGANIZATION

PERSUASION

COMMENTSTOTAL

_______

Each group will be given a proposition. Research is crucial. Researching and learning specific

vocabulary is equally crucial.

Here are some links that may be of help:DEBATE CENTRAL

http://www.uvm.edu/~debate/learndebate.html

INTERNATIONAL DEBATE EDUCATION ASSOCIATION http://www.idebate.org/debatabase/

In recent years, more juveniles (under 18) are being tried as adults when they commit adult crimes. What do you think

about this?Hold a classroom debate on the

following proposition:

Juveniles should be tried as adults when they commit

adult crimes.

Marriage is arguably losing its appeal, claim many social scientists. Divorce is on the increase and statistics show that one

out of every three marriages end in divorce.

Hold a classroom debate on the following proposition:

The institution of marriage as a religious and legal bond may be considered outdated in today’s

society.

DEBATE PROPOSITION 3Life quality is improving worldwide. People

are getting healthier and, as a consequence, living longer than ever.

Increased life expectancy has become a major social problem in modern societies. Hold a classroom debate on the following

proposition:

State pension age should be determined individually by a

medical evaluation taken after 65.

AFFIRMATIVE NEGATIVE

Juveniles should be tried as adults when they commit adult crimes.

AFFIRMATIVE NEGATIVE

The institution of marriage as a religious and legal bond may

be considered outdated in today’s society.

DEBATE PROPOSITION 3

AFFIRMATIVE NEGATIVE

State pension age should be determined individually by a

medical evaluation taken after 65.