presentation: improving ed-tech purchasing

Upload: digitalpromise

Post on 02-Jun-2018

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/10/2019 Presentation: Improving Ed-Tech Purchasing

    1/50

    Improving Ed-tech Purchasing

  • 8/10/2019 Presentation: Improving Ed-Tech Purchasing

    2/50

    There are over

    14,000school

    districts in the US...

  • 8/10/2019 Presentation: Improving Ed-Tech Purchasing

    3/50

    And countless educational

    technology products...

  • 8/10/2019 Presentation: Improving Ed-Tech Purchasing

    4/50

    Ed-tech is a

    $9 billion dollar industry

  • 8/10/2019 Presentation: Improving Ed-Tech Purchasing

    5/50

  • 8/10/2019 Presentation: Improving Ed-Tech Purchasing

    6/50

    Why is there such a disconnect

    between schools and providers?

  • 8/10/2019 Presentation: Improving Ed-Tech Purchasing

    7/50

    Digital Promiseand

    the Education Industry Association

    teamed up to understand ed-tech procurement

  • 8/10/2019 Presentation: Improving Ed-Tech Purchasing

    8/50

    We gathered information from both

    providersand educators

  • 8/10/2019 Presentation: Improving Ed-Tech Purchasing

    9/50

    From

    54 districts&

    47 companies

  • 8/10/2019 Presentation: Improving Ed-Tech Purchasing

    10/50

    0%

    15%

    30%

    45%

    60%

    Superintendents Principals Business

    Officers

    Providers

    Providers mostly unsatisfied

    with procurement processes

    Very Unsatisfied Unsatisfied Neutral Satisfied Very Satisfied

  • 8/10/2019 Presentation: Improving Ed-Tech Purchasing

    11/50

  • 8/10/2019 Presentation: Improving Ed-Tech Purchasing

    12/50

    2.4

    38.1

    11.9

    40.5

    7.10%

    12.5%

    25%

    37.5%

    50%

    Business officers split on

    satisfaction with time taken

    Very Unsatisfied Unsatisfied Neutral Satisfied Very Satisfied

  • 8/10/2019 Presentation: Improving Ed-Tech Purchasing

    13/50

    62%

    of providers say

    procurementrequirements

    directly influence

    product

    development

  • 8/10/2019 Presentation: Improving Ed-Tech Purchasing

    14/50

    60%of providers saymore efficient

    procurement would

    reduct product costs

  • 8/10/2019 Presentation: Improving Ed-Tech Purchasing

    15/50

    Here aresix key highlights

  • 8/10/2019 Presentation: Improving Ed-Tech Purchasing

    16/50

    Needs Assessment

    is Informal

  • 8/10/2019 Presentation: Improving Ed-Tech Purchasing

    17/50

    Schools only scratch the

    surface when assessing

    instructional needs

  • 8/10/2019 Presentation: Improving Ed-Tech Purchasing

    18/50

    A clearer picture of instructional

    challenges and priorities could improve

    ed-tech product fit

  • 8/10/2019 Presentation: Improving Ed-Tech Purchasing

    19/50

    End Users

    Arent Very Involved

  • 8/10/2019 Presentation: Improving Ed-Tech Purchasing

    20/50

    Students and teachersoften are not part of the ed-tech

    decision making process

  • 8/10/2019 Presentation: Improving Ed-Tech Purchasing

    21/50

    CTOs & Curriculum Directors arereported to be most involved in

    procurement process

    Students/Parents District Staff

    INVOLVEMENT

    Teachers

  • 8/10/2019 Presentation: Improving Ed-Tech Purchasing

    22/50

    32%of providers satisfied

    with involvement of

    end users

    Superintendents? 70%

  • 8/10/2019 Presentation: Improving Ed-Tech Purchasing

    23/50

    28.6

    0.0

    47.6

    21.4

    9.5

    20.4

    14.3

    43.7

    0.014.6

    0%

    12.5%

    25%

    37.5%

    50%

    62.5%

    Respondent Group: Business

    Officers

    Respondent Group: Principals

    Business officers and principals disagree on

    de-centralized purchasing

    Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree

  • 8/10/2019 Presentation: Improving Ed-Tech Purchasing

    24/50

    Product Discovery is

    Especially Difficult

  • 8/10/2019 Presentation: Improving Ed-Tech Purchasing

    25/50

    The market is flooded with ed-tech products,and schools struggle to sort through

    whats available

  • 8/10/2019 Presentation: Improving Ed-Tech Purchasing

    26/50

    IF THERES A GOOD

    VENDOR OUT THERE DOINGWONDERFUL THINGS, ITS

    HARD TO FIND THAT

    VENDOR.-Assistant Superintendent

  • 8/10/2019 Presentation: Improving Ed-Tech Purchasing

    27/50

    Schools need

    better information about

    available products

  • 8/10/2019 Presentation: Improving Ed-Tech Purchasing

    28/50

    Limited Meaningful Evidence

    of Product Success

  • 8/10/2019 Presentation: Improving Ed-Tech Purchasing

    29/50

    Districts value rigorous

    evidence, but fewproviders can afford to

    develop it

  • 8/10/2019 Presentation: Improving Ed-Tech Purchasing

    30/50

    Districts often dont trustproviders evidence

    Providers dont thinkdistricts know what

    evidence to look for

  • 8/10/2019 Presentation: Improving Ed-Tech Purchasing

    31/50

    OUR INTERNAL EFFICACY

    RIGOR IS RARELY AN ASSET

    BECAUSE FEW DISTRICTS

    KNOW HOW TO ASSESS OR

    DIFFERENTIATE VENDOREFFICACY CLAIMS

    -Provider

  • 8/10/2019 Presentation: Improving Ed-Tech Purchasing

    32/50

    29%

    of technology

    directors satisfied

    with credibility of

    providers evidenceof effectiveness

  • 8/10/2019 Presentation: Improving Ed-Tech Purchasing

    33/50

    With these evidence gaps,

    districts and providers alike rely heavily

    on referrals and pilots

  • 8/10/2019 Presentation: Improving Ed-Tech Purchasing

    34/50

    Most Pilots Arent Rigorous

  • 8/10/2019 Presentation: Improving Ed-Tech Purchasing

    35/50

    While pilots are used frequently,

    they are mostly unstructured

  • 8/10/2019 Presentation: Improving Ed-Tech Purchasing

    36/50

    Most providers dont see

    pilots as a clear path to scale

  • 8/10/2019 Presentation: Improving Ed-Tech Purchasing

    37/50

    4.3

    12.8

    29.831.9

    25.5

    31.9

    36.2

    21.3

    4.3 2.10%

    10%

    20%

    30%

    40%

    Opportunities to conduct pilots Opportunities to scale afterward

    Providers: limited satisfaction with pilot

    opportunities

    Very Unsatisfied Unsatisfied Neutral Satisfied Very Satisfied

  • 8/10/2019 Presentation: Improving Ed-Tech Purchasing

    38/50

    83%

    of providers say

    guidelines for post-

    pilot expansion

    (without new RFP)would help

  • 8/10/2019 Presentation: Improving Ed-Tech Purchasing

    39/50

    Providers Struggle in

    Buyers Market

  • 8/10/2019 Presentation: Improving Ed-Tech Purchasing

    40/50

    Providers find it difficult

    to rise above the noise in

    a crowded market

  • 8/10/2019 Presentation: Improving Ed-Tech Purchasing

    41/50

    23%of providers satisfied

    with ability to gain

    visibility in a district

  • 8/10/2019 Presentation: Improving Ed-Tech Purchasing

    42/50

    Poor communication,

    complicated and

    untrusted RFPs, and time

    delays add to their

    frustrations

  • 8/10/2019 Presentation: Improving Ed-Tech Purchasing

    43/50

  • 8/10/2019 Presentation: Improving Ed-Tech Purchasing

    44/50

    So, what can be done toimprove ed-tech purchasing?

  • 8/10/2019 Presentation: Improving Ed-Tech Purchasing

    45/50

    Better guidelines for

    Conducting needs assessments

    Evaluating evidence

    Administering pilots

  • 8/10/2019 Presentation: Improving Ed-Tech Purchasing

    46/50

    Incentives to get results &

    show evidence

    Simplified RFP processes

    Clearer pilot guidelines

  • 8/10/2019 Presentation: Improving Ed-Tech Purchasing

    47/50

  • 8/10/2019 Presentation: Improving Ed-Tech Purchasing

    48/50

  • 8/10/2019 Presentation: Improving Ed-Tech Purchasing

    49/50

    By working together to improve these practices,we can get the right products into the hands

    of the right teachers & students

  • 8/10/2019 Presentation: Improving Ed-Tech Purchasing

    50/50

    Learn more atDigitalPromise.org/marketplace

    andEducationIndustry.org