presentation - cut c60 solar cell characterization - blue sky solar racing

22
Sunpower C60 IV Curve Characterization 2013 09 04 Peter Sun & Ahthavan Sureshkumar

Upload: petersun825

Post on 19-Jan-2016

66 views

Category:

Documents


6 download

DESCRIPTION

Cut Sunpower C60 solar cell characterization. The data collected was analyzed and then used to imrpove Matlab simulation model used for solar vehicle array output during one week race in Australia for World Solar Challenge.

TRANSCRIPT

  • Sunpower C60 IV Curve Characterization

    2013 09 04Peter Sun & Ahthavan Sureshkumar

  • Motivation

    Improving accuracy of array simulation results Creating a calibrated pyranometer Understanding net consequences of array cut

    decisions and lamination Understanding relationship of angle

    dependence of solar cell-lamination combination

  • Test Plan

    Measure Sunpower C60 IV curves at a site of known irradiance, at 15min intervals

    Orient 2 cells towards the sun to eliminate angle dependence, results to be averaged

    Compare results between oriented horiz. oriented cell and oriented cells

    Orient all 3 cells horizontally to determine statistical variation between cells

  • C60 Manufacturer SpecificationsSunpower provides specifications for a full, bare cell, at standard testing conditions.

    The published expected IV curves are most likely simulated.

  • Differences

    Lamination {Peter please elaborate}

    Size New rectangular size:

    31.75 x 125 mm Decrease in area-to-

    perimeter results in degradation of performance

    32.57mm2:1mm to 12.66mm2:1mm

  • Expected Results

    Modeling a PV cell using the below equation, as per The Winning Solar Car, the following dependencies are: Rs, Rsh = f(Voc, Isc) IL, IS = f(n, Voc, Isc)

    If power/current prop. to size only, then at STC, new peak power, peak current, short-circuit current per cell: 0.86 W 1.51 A 1.62 A

    IL potential current sunlight createsIS diode saturation currentRSH shunt resistanceRS internal series resistancen model parameter

    (1.5 for silicon cells)

  • Testing Location

    UTM gratefully allowed us access to pyranometer readings at their local meteorology station, as well as gain access to the local vicinity to correlate PV measurements with locally measured irradiance values.

  • UTM

    Testing Location

  • Externalprogramming

    input

    Setup

    HP 6060BElectronic Load

    + -

    Sourceinputs

    CurrentSensingoutput

    PVCustom

    waveform generator

    -

    +

    clip

    Laptop Oscilloscope

    Ch A Ch B

    PV

    -

    +

    USB

    USB Input

    Output

  • Setup

  • Controlling the Electronic Load A programmable input in the

    back of the HP 6060B electronic load allows the user to control the current going through the 6060B whilst in Constant Current mode.

    Any waveform generator can be used. The particular waveform generator, the Syscomp CGR-101, can only output up to 3V. The 6060B will scale the input voltage using a 0.6 scaling factor if the range is specified to be 6A

    0

    0.5

    1

    1.5

    2

    2.5

    0 0.5 1 1.5 2

    Curr

    ent (

    A)

    Time(s)

    Constant Current Control

    A sawtooth waveform between 0-3V was defined, to enable a sweep of current through the PV cell.

    The current will be limited by the current that the PV can output, regardless of the current setting.

  • RESULTS SINGLE, HORIZ. CELL

  • -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2

    1.16

    1.18

    1.2

    1.22

    1.24

    1.26

    1.28tek0066ALL.csv

    Time (s)

    Vol

    tage

    (V)

    -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2-0.1

    -0.05

    0

    0.05

    0.1

    0.15

    0.2

    0.25

    0.3tek0066ALL.csv

    Time (s)

    Cur

    rent

    (I)

    1.15 1.2 1.25-0.1

    -0.05

    0

    0.05

    0.1

    0.15

    0.2

    0.25

    0.3

    tek0066ALL.csvn value = 1.650287e+03

    Voltage (V)

    Cur

    rent

    (A)

    Only measured a fraction of the entire IV curve

    Electronic load was providing weak signals.

    Unfortunately, majority of collecteddata was not useful.

  • -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2-0.2

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    1.2tek0072ALL.csv

    Time (s)

    Cur

    rent

    (I)

    -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 20

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    0.6

    0.7tek0072ALL.csv

    Time (s)

    Vol

    tage

    (V)

    Correction made, but clouds rolled in conveniently. A few measurements were made, but could not be correlated to irradiance values since irradiance values are averaged over 15min intervals, and irradiance fluctuated greatly.

  • 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7-0.4

    -0.2

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    1.2

    tek0072ALL.csvn value = 2.09429

    Voltage (V)

    Cur

    rent

    (A)

    n=1

    n=1.5n=2

    Filtered

    Raw data

    IV curve w/ arb. n-value

    IV curve w/ fitted param.

  • 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7-0.4

    -0.2

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    1.2

    tek0069ALL.csvn value = 2.08055

    Voltage (V)

    Cur

    rent

    (A)

    0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7-0.4

    -0.2

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    1.2

    tek0072ALL.csvn value = 2.09429

    Voltage (V)

    Cur

    rent

    (A)

    Orientation: HorizontalSunlight: Bright (irradiance unknown)Params:-Voc: 0.6138 V-Isc: 1.1463 A -n: 2.0805

    Comment: Sporadic, intensity sunlight allow us to acquire this data. Note the high n-value as compared to 1.5 typically assumed for a silicon cell.

    Results on right is variable due to variable sunlight.

  • -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2-0.2

    -0.1

    0

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    tek0069ALL.csvPmax = 0.450849 W, Imax = 1.00189 A, Vmax = 0.45

    Current (A)

    Pow

    er (W

    )

    -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2-0.2

    -0.1

    0

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    tek0072ALL.csvPmax = 0.424867 W, Imax = 0.944148 A, Vmax = 0.45

    Current (A)

    Pow

    er (W

    )

  • 2-CELL STRING

  • -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 20.4

    0.5

    0.6

    0.7

    0.8

    0.9

    1

    1.1

    1.2

    1.3tek0068ALL.csv

    Time (s)

    Vol

    tage

    (V)

    -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2-0.2

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    1.2

    1.4

    1.6tek0068ALL.csv

    Time (s)

    Cur

    rent

    (I)

  • 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 1.1 1.2 1.3-0.2

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    1.2

    1.4

    1.6tek0068ALL.csv

    Voltage (V)

    Cur

    rent

    (A)

  • 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4-0.2

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    1.2

    1.4

    1.6

    1.8tek0071ALL.csv

    Voltage (V)

    Cur

    rent

    (A)

  • -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4-0.1

    -0.05

    0

    0.05

    0.1

    0.15

    0.2

    0.25

    0.3

    tek0073ALL.csvn value = 1.86641

    Voltage (V)

    Cur

    rent

    (A)

    -0.05 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3-0.1

    -0.05

    0

    0.05

    0.1

    0.15

    0.2

    0.25

    tek0073ALL.csvPmax = 0.190549 W, Imax = 0.200578 A, Vmax = 0.95

    Current (A)P

    ower

    (W)

    Attempted to model IV curve from 2 cells just to be able to generate estimate of peak power.

    This was taken during shady conditions, so the SNR was low and the resulting power is very low.

    Sunpower C60 IV Curve CharacterizationMotivationTest PlanC60 Manufacturer SpecificationsDifferencesExpected ResultsTesting LocationTesting LocationSetupSetupControlling the Electronic LoadRESULTS Single, Horiz. cellSlide Number 13Slide Number 14Slide Number 15Slide Number 16Slide Number 172-cell stringSlide Number 19Slide Number 20Slide Number 21Slide Number 22