presentation by sangeetha.n.kumar x std. embassy public school
TRANSCRIPT
• Introduction• Farming Types - Chemical farming - Organic farming• Chemical Farming - Advantages - Disadvantages • Organic Farming - Components - Principles - Methods - Advantages - Disadvantages• Case Study• Comparative Study• Statistical Data• Conclusion
Content
CHEMICAL FARMING
• Lays emphasis on use of Chemicals
Advantages
Nutrient specific
Rapid results
High yields
Disadvantages
Pollution
Soil quality
Eutrophication
Ground water pollution
Biomagnification
ORGANIC FARMING
A production system which avoids the use of synthetic fertilizers
Integrated Pest
Management
Integrated Disease
ManagementIntegrated
WeedManagement
Crop Rotation
Organic Biofertilizers
IntegratedFarming
ORGANIC FARMING
COMPONENTS OF ORGANIC FARMING
PRINCIPLES OF ORGANIC FARMING
→Biodiversity→Sustainability→Natural Plant
Nutrition→Natural Pest
Management→ Integrity
METHODS OF ORGANIC FARMING
Organic Pest Control Soil Quality Biodynamics Vermiculture Earthworm : The Natural Bioreactor Vermicompost
ORGANIC FARMING
ADVANTAGES
Natural Resources remain intact
Pollution hazards
Use of Organic Wastes
Employment opportunities
Generate Original Eco system
Lower Investments
DISADVANTAGES
Not Nutrient Specific
Labour
Timely vigil
• CASE 1:• Name of plant : Tulsi• Scientific name : Oscimum sanctum• Height : 1-1.5ft.• Plant type : Herb• Leaf type : Variegated, reticulate venation, Dicot ANALYSIS: A frail tulsi plant was taken as a sample study. It was observed for a
period of 24 days. It was supplied with an Organic preparation in addition to wastes supplied to it.
OBSERVATIONS: The plant was observed to recover within the stipulated time. CONTROL: A plant treated with chemicals INFERENCE: Organic inputs were found to be more effective. The soil treated with
Organic preparation was found to be of pH 6.1 while the one with chemicals was tested for 4.5
CASE STUDY
• CASE 2:• Name of plant : Toor• Scientific name : Caganus cagan• Height : 3 ft.• Plant type : Annual• Leaf type : An oval leaf blade, reticulate,
Dicot, Legume ANALYSIS: A toor plant was taken as a sample study. It was observed for a period of 6
months. The plant was supplied with an Organic preparation in addition to Organic wastes supplied to it.
OBSERVATIONS: The plant was a success as a perennial crop by supplying three yields.
The grains were found to be sweet , large in size. It also recorded an extra growth of 5ft.
CONTROL: A plant supplied with chemicals. INFERENCE: Organic inputs were found to be more productive and economical. The soil
with Organic inputs recorded pH 6.0 whereas that treated with chemicals recorded a pH of 5.2
CASE STUDY
COMPARATIVE STUDY
• Chemical Farming
ة Use of chemicalsة Eco unfriendlyة Nutrient specific but
hazardousة The farmer spraying the
chemicals is affected.ة Uneconomicalة Not sustainable
• Organic Farming
ة Discard of chemicalsة Eco friendlyة Nutrient specific, non
hazardousة Does not involve chemicals
so no side effects.ة Economicalة Sustainable
COMPARATIVE STUDY
• Organic Farming Higher Nitrogen fixation High microbe activity Less loss of nutrition SUSTAINABLE
• Chemical Farming Nitrogen reduced Reduced microbes High Nutrition loss UNSUSTAINABLE
.Chemicals are eco unfriendly while organic wastes are easily decomposedة
Sustainable Potentially
Sustainable Unsustainable
Natural System
OrganicFarmingSystem
ChemicalFarmingSystem
STATISTICAL DATA
• COUNTRY
ه Sweden ه Australiaه USAه Uruguayه Germany
ه Italy
٭ % OF LAND UNDER ORGANIC CULTIVATION
٭ 19%٭ 11%٭ 00.2%٭ 04%٭ 04%٭ 08%
CONCLUSION
• Organic Farming is Nature friendly.• It is soil sustaining.• THUS ORGANIC FARMING CAN BE CONSIDERED THE MOST SUSTAINABLE FORM OF AGRICULTURE.
PEST
ORGANICFARMING
NATURAL
ENEMIES
PREDATORS &
PARASITES
RESIDUE
INCORPORATION
N FIXATION
CULTURAL
NUTRIENT
SUPPORT ANDAUGMENTNATURALPROCESSES
SUSTAIN-ABILITY
SUPPORT ANDAUGMENTNATURAL
PROCESSES