present challenges for modern cement plants€¦ · “petroleum coke”or “petcoke ... 3ms 2 +...
TRANSCRIPT
Present challenges for modern Cement Plants
Arturo Abarca, REFRAREFRAREFRAREFRATECHNIK México S.A. de C.V.
XXVII Technical Congress FICEM-APCAC
Agenda
• Energy-Efficiency
• CO2-Emissions
• Clinker
• Cement
• Summary / Discussion
source: vdz
source: vdz
Targets for Decrease in Energy Intensity, 2010-2050
(World Business Council for Sustainable Development)
3
3,1
3,2
3,3
3,4
3,5
3,6
3,7
3,8
3,9
4
2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050
3,9
3,2
3,6
3,4
Gj/Tonne
Change of circumstances for Cement Production (I)Change of circumstances for Cement Production (I)Change of circumstances for Cement Production (I)Change of circumstances for Cement Production (I)
• TodayTodayTodayToday
• 5 and more combustibles
• spot quantities possible
• peak-/off-peak-E-supply
• special E-net-rates for
atypical power consumption
• large variety of composite
cements
• emission trading
• CO2 monitoring
• 30 years before30 years before30 years before30 years before
• 100 % fuel or coal
• 1 fuel
• simple power supply
• 1 major product (CEM I)
• CO2 ?
1. Raw material related emissions:
clinker: 0,53 t CO2/ t clinker0,53 t CO2/ t clinker0,53 t CO2/ t clinker0,53 t CO2/ t clinker
cement: 0,40 t CO2/ t cement0,40 t CO2/ t cement0,40 t CO2/ t cement0,40 t CO2/ t cement
� Decarbonation of limestone
2. Fuel related emissions: 0,34 t CO2/ t cement0,34 t CO2/ t cement0,34 t CO2/ t cement0,34 t CO2/ t cement
� Combustion of fossil fuels
3. Energy related emissions from electricity consumption:
0,29 t CO2/ t cement0,29 t CO2/ t cement0,29 t CO2/ t cement0,29 t CO2/ t cement
� Grinding, cooling air etc.
COCOCOCO2222----emissions in the cement industry emissions in the cement industry emissions in the cement industry emissions in the cement industry
1,88
2,20
1,86
1,55
1,88
2,332,22
2,34
0,00
0,50
1,00
1,50
2,00
2,50
2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 2055
Targets for CO2 total emissions, Gtonne 2010-2050
(World Business Council for Sustainable Development)
Baseline emissions
Blue emissions
Gtonne CO2
Cost optimization in the cement industry Cost optimization in the cement industry Cost optimization in the cement industry Cost optimization in the cement industry
Alternative Fuels Lower clinker content
+ lower costs
+/- process
- logistics
- investments
- surveillance
+ lower CO2 costs
- higher grade clinker
- logistics/storage
- investments ?
- quality control
- lower production costs ?
Change of circumstances for Cement ProductionChange of circumstances for Cement ProductionChange of circumstances for Cement ProductionChange of circumstances for Cement Production
• TodayTodayTodayToday
• large variety of composite
cements
• HPC also with composite cements
• 42,5 R and 52,5 R
• extreme fine grinding
• combo grinding
• high performing Clinkers required
• 30 years before30 years before30 years before30 years before
• 1 major product (CEM I)
Higher fineness:
CEM II/A-S (15 – 20 % S) + 200 to 500 Blaine
CEM II/A-V (15 - 20 % V) + 800 to 1000 Blaine
CEM II/A-LL (15 - 20 % LL) +1000 to 1200 Blaine
Activating grinding aids:
Possible gain of early strength 2 – 4 N/mm² (after 1 or 2 d)
Early strength Early strength Early strength Early strength
Grindability of different main constituents acc. Zeisel
for 4000 Blaine
Clinker 40 – 60 kWh/t
Fly ash > 45 µm 20 – 30 kWh/t
Limestone 5 – 15 kWh/t
Slag 50 – 80 kWh/t
Composite Cements Composite Cements Composite Cements Composite Cements
70%
71%
72%
73%
74%
75%
76%
77%
78%
2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 2055
Targets for cement to clinker ratio, 2010-2050
(World Business Council for Sustainable Development)
71%71%71%71%
73%73%73%73%
74%74%74%74%
77%77%77%77%
Clinker %
Alternative FuelsAlternative FuelsAlternative FuelsAlternative Fuels
Targets for alternative fuels use, 2010-2050
(World Business Council for Sustainable Development)
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 2055
5%5%5%5%
12%12%12%12%
23%23%23%23%
37%37%37%37%
% AF
Alternative fuel utilization in German cement plants
4,1
7,410,2 10,8
13,415,8
18,6
23
38,4
42,1
47,650
52,554,4
30,3
34,9
25,7
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
1987
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
Subst
itutionsr
ate
in %
Subst
itutionsr
ate
in %
Subst
itutionsr
ate
in %
Subst
itutionsr
ate
in %
Source: VDZ
37%
Target Target Target Target forforforfor 2050205020502050
(WBCSD)(WBCSD)(WBCSD)(WBCSD)
PetcokePetcokePetcokePetcoke an an an an ““““AlternativAlternativAlternativAlternativ fuelfuelfuelfuel””””
Secondary fuel from oil refinery coker units
“Petroleum coke” or “Petcoke”High Carbon content
High calorific value (~ 30GJ/t)
Low volatiles (<11%)Low ash content
Very low ash content <1%
High Sulfur content
2-6% (price strongly depending on the S-content)
Going from coal to petcoke: What changes ?Going from coal to petcoke: What changes ?Going from coal to petcoke: What changes ?Going from coal to petcoke: What changes ?
Raw coal
Uniform blending petcoke/raw coal (if petcoke < 100%)Coal mill
Requires higher fineness (due to less volatiles)
Affects mill capacity (different grindability and higher fineness, evaluate by trial)Kiln
Low ash and high CV
Low reactive fuel, ignition delayed
High sulfur causing more plugging (kiln inlet/preheater)
Stable and controlled kiln process to minimize sulfur cyclesClinker quality
More SO3 in clinker (better strength development, red. gypsum addition)
Rules: Basic potential & supplyRules: Basic potential & supplyRules: Basic potential & supplyRules: Basic potential & supply
Alkali/sulfur
For a first conservative approach, go for following total inputs :
On precalciner kilns even better result are achievable , under ideal conditions :
Petcoke supply
Top grade (2%S, HGI>55)
High grade (4%S, HGI>55)
Low grade (6/7% S, HGI 40)
SO3
inputs < 1.5 % (clinker basis)
Molar A/S > 0.8
SO3
inputs < 2.5 %
Molar A/S down to 0.4
PetcokePetcokePetcokePetcoke : Mixing & Grinding: Mixing & Grinding: Mixing & Grinding: Mixing & Grinding
Raw coal/petcoke preparation
Controlled mixing from two feed hoppers
Coal mill
Recommended fineness for 100 % petcoke
Determine mill output by trial (HGI can be misleading)
depending on the “shot”-amount
R 90 µ < 5 %
R 200 µ < 1%
Inside the KilnInside the KilnInside the KilnInside the Kiln
Curcuits inside rotary kilns
Hot meal Hot meal Hot meal Hot meal –––– Indication of process stabilityIndication of process stabilityIndication of process stabilityIndication of process stability
Hot meal analysis
Adequate frequency, usually once per shift
Monitor LOI (decarbonation), SO3, K
2O
SO3< 5 % (if chlorine < 0.5%)
Risk of coating due to SO3 and Cl concentration in hot meal
PreheaterPreheaterPreheaterPreheater carecarecarecare
Preheater cleaning
Add poking possibilities and air cannons (can be up to 100) where coatings occur
Removing of heavy blockages can also be done with CARDOX blasting on demand.
Anti coating SiC-refractories in the riser duct
Observation of the Temperature-profile inside the inlet/rising duct
Clinker chemistryClinker chemistryClinker chemistryClinker chemistry
Alkalisulfate on AlitAlkalisulfate on Alit
Clinker chemistryClinker chemistryClinker chemistryClinker chemistry
• K2SO4 has a melting point at 1069°C
• evaporation/condensation-circuits will develop
• low alkali/sulfate ratio may have an impact on setting
• high alkali/sulfate ratio ⇒ K2SO4
- High solubility in water
- much quicker than Hemihydrates or Anhydrite
- may help the workability
• K2SO4 has a melting point at 1069°C
• evaporation/condensation-circuits will develop
• low alkali/sulfate ratio may have an impact on setting
• high alkali/sulfate ratio ⇒ K2SO4
- High solubility in water
- much quicker than Hemihydrates or Anhydrite
- may help the workability
Sulfates Chlorides Alkalis
(sulfides)
Basic bricks reaction infiltration infiltration, reaction
(C2S, C3MS2, CMS, KFeS2) (KFeS2)
Alumina bricks reaction infiltration reaction
(C4A3·SO3) (KAS4, KAS6)
Castables reaction infiltration reaction
(C4A3·SO3 ) (KAS4, KAS6)
Kiln shell, reaction catalytic reaction reaction
Metallic anchors (NiS, Cr2S3) (chromate formation)
Reaction of Volatile Elements with Refractory MaterialsReaction of Volatile Elements with Refractory MaterialsReaction of Volatile Elements with Refractory MaterialsReaction of Volatile Elements with Refractory Materials
Oxidizing Atmosphere
2 C2S + MgO +SO3 CaSO4 + C3MS2
C3MS2 + MgO +SO3 CaSO4 + 2 CMS
CMS + MgO +SO3 CaSO4 + M2S
2 CaSO4 + K2SO4 2 CaSO4.K2SO4
3 MgO.Al2O
3+ 4 CaO + SO3 4CaO.3Al
2O
3.SO
3+ 3 MgO
Essential Chemical Reactions of Kiln Atmosphere Compounds with BEssential Chemical Reactions of Kiln Atmosphere Compounds with BEssential Chemical Reactions of Kiln Atmosphere Compounds with BEssential Chemical Reactions of Kiln Atmosphere Compounds with Basic Brick Compoundsasic Brick Compoundsasic Brick Compoundsasic Brick Compounds
Reducing Atmosphere
4 MgO + 2 K2O + 4 FeO.Al
2O
3+ 8 SO
24 KFeS
2+ 4 MgO.Al
2O
3+ 11 O
2
MgFe2O
4+ K
2O + 4 SO
22 KFeS
2+ MgO + 6 O
2red. (1)
2 KFeS2+ 8 O2 K2SO4 + Fe2(SO4)3 ox. (2)
PbO + SO3 PbS + 2 O2
2 CO CO2 + C (Boudouard’s equilibrium)
Essential Chemical Reactions of Kiln Atmosphere Compounds with BEssential Chemical Reactions of Kiln Atmosphere Compounds with BEssential Chemical Reactions of Kiln Atmosphere Compounds with BEssential Chemical Reactions of Kiln Atmosphere Compounds with Basic Brick Compoundsasic Brick Compoundsasic Brick Compoundsasic Brick Compounds
A3S2 + 16 SiO2 +3 K2O 3 KAS6 (feldspar formation)
A3S2 + 10 SiO2 +3 K2O 3 KAS4 (leucite formation)
2 A3S2 + 8 SiO2 +6 K2O 6 KAS2 (kalsilite formation)
11 Al2O3 + K2O + Na2O (K,N)A11 (ß-corundum formation)
K2SO4.2CaSO4 + H2O CaSO4.K2SO4.H2O (syngenite formation)
2 CaSO4 + K2SO4 2CaSO4.K2SO4
Essential Chemical Essential Chemical Essential Chemical Essential Chemical ReactionsReactionsReactionsReactions of of of of KilnKilnKilnKiln AtmosphereAtmosphereAtmosphereAtmosphere CompoundsCompoundsCompoundsCompounds
withwithwithwith AluminaAluminaAluminaAlumina BrickBrickBrickBrick CompoundsCompoundsCompoundsCompounds
hot face
cold face
Corrosion by sulfates
Infiltration and condensationof chlorides
Crack formation due to elasticity differences
SpallingSpallingSpallingSpalling of a basic brick caused by elasticity differencesof a basic brick caused by elasticity differencesof a basic brick caused by elasticity differencesof a basic brick caused by elasticity differences
due to infiltrationsdue to infiltrationsdue to infiltrationsdue to infiltrations
Conflicting goals?
Reduction in the clinker to cement ratio
Lower clinker burnability
Higher quality clinker
CO2 reduction
Reduction in
energy intensity
Changes in clinker chemistry
Higher C3S content
Higher energy consumption for clinker
production
CONFLIC
T
Use of
fluxing
agents?
POSIBLE MEASURES TO REACH GOAL
Conflicting goals?
Reduction in the clinker to cement ratio
Lower clinker burnability
Higher quality clinker
CO2 reduction
Reduction in
energy intensity
Changes in clinker chemistry
Higher C3S content
Higher energy consumption for clinker
production
CONFLIC
T
Use of
fluxing
agents?
POSIBLE MEASURES TO REACH GOAL
Conflicting goals?
Reduction in the clinker to cement ratio
CO2 reduction
Reduction in
energy intensityCONFLIC
T
POSIBLE MEASURES TO REACH GOAL
Finer Grinding
Increased energy consuption in cement grinding
Increased wear of grinding media
Wherever in the world you are, the road ahead is full of new
challenges.
Refratechnik is there, to help you meet
these challenges!
But you are not alone
Thank you very much for your kind attention