preparation of mock tile mcps 01042011 anil mane, qing peng, jeffrey elam argonne national...
TRANSCRIPT
Preparation of Mock tile MCPs
01042011
Anil Mane, Qing Peng, Jeffrey ElamArgonne National Laboratory
Objective:
2
•To prepare 8 workable MCPs for mock tile assembly•Collect within batch MCPs resistance data for resistive coating ALD process •Collect batch-to-batch MCPs resistance data for resistive coating ALD process
Experimental:
• Used 2 batch of 5 MCPs with NiCr electrode• Passivation (53A)• Resistive coating chemistry-2 (~800A)• SEE coating (53A)
3
NiCr deposition at Fermi lab:
NiCr electrode on 1st batch of 5 MCPs
MCP# 125 126 127 128 129
•One of the MCP holder has electrode exposure dimension issue
NiCr electrode on 2nd batch of 5 MCPs
MCP# 130 131 132 133 134
4
MCPs placement prior to ALD in substrate loading tray
MCP with NiCr electrode Before ALD
After ALD
MCP# 125 126 127 128 129
•Uniform deposition on monitors (quartz and Si(100)) as well as on all MCPs
5
ALD coating thickness across the reactor
•Thickness uniformity on monitor Si(100) <2%• The resistive layer thickness ~800A• Similar thickness trend observed on second batch of 5 MCPs Excellent batch-to-batch reproducibility
6
I-V(-10V to +10V) Response in air for 10 MCPs
•Linear I-V response for all MCPs•MCP 131 resistance is out of targeted value (Outlier)•Little scatter in I-V plot
Removed MCP 131 data
7
I-V(-100V to +100V) Response in vacuum (4e-3mbar) for 10 MCPs
•Linear I-V response for all MCPs•MCP 131 resistance is out of targeted value•Little scatter in I-V plot
Removed MCP 131 data
8
I-V Comparison (air vs. vacuum) 9 MCPs
•Linear I-V response for all MCPs•Very little change in I-V values•Little scatter in I-V plot
•Electrical contact cause by electrode underneath?•Related to end spoiling ?•ALD chemistry composition across the reactor? •Electrode area ?
I-V in Air I-V in Vacuum (4e-3mbar)
-10V to +10V -100V to +100V
9
Resistance Comparison for 9 MCPs (air vs. vacuum)
•Very little change in average resistance ( air 111 M vs. vacuum 115 M) •Average resistance in vacuum = 115 ±12 M ~10% resistance variation
10
Resistance for 10 MCPs
What's wrong with MCP# 131?
11
Resistance for 10 MCPs
Cause for outlier (MCP131): •
12
Resistance for 10 MCPs
Cause for outlier (MCP131): •
•Gap in triple points can cause electrode penetration and cause localize low resistance regimes
Will affect greatly on 8”x8” MCPNeed minimum(?) defects on MCPs
Summary
13
Prepared 10 MCPs with ALD resistive layer chemistry-2 and SEE (Al2O3) layer
•Excellent resistive layer uniformity across the ALD reactor
•Within batch good ALD layer reproducibility
•Very good batch-to-batch reproducible of ALD process
All MCPs shows linear I-V response
•Very little change in resistance of MCPs (Air vs. Vacuum)
•Average resistance for MCP = 115M
Big gap @ triple point are responsible for outliers
NiCr electrode deposition need same dimension MCP holders
•Will vary the total # of active pores (resistances)
Next plan for Mock tile:
14
Selected 8 MCPs Gain test in APS test set-up
George and grid (A, B, & C) spacer resistance tuning
Resistance test on stack of [MCPs, George and & spacer (A, B, & C ) on Mock tile
Gain test at UCB (Prof. Ossy’s Lab)