prentice hall, 2004chapter 2 wheelen/hunger 1 corporate governance and social responsibility
TRANSCRIPT
Prentice Hall, 2004 Chapter 2Wheelen/Hunger
1
Corporate Governance
and
Social Responsibility
Prentice Hall, 2004 Chapter 2Wheelen/Hunger
2
Corporate Governance
Prentice Hall, 2004 Chapter 2Wheelen/Hunger
3
Corporate Governance
Defined:
Refers to the relationship among the board of directors, top management, and shareholders in determining the direction and performance of the corporation.
Prentice Hall, 2004 Chapter 2Wheelen/Hunger
4
Corporate Governance
•Setting corporate strategy, overall direction, mission or vision
•Hiring and firing the CEO and top management
•Controlling, monitoring, or supervisingtop management
•Reviewing and approving the use of resources
•Caring for shareholder interests
Board of Directors
Prentice Hall, 2004 Chapter 2Wheelen/Hunger
5
Corporate GovernanceRole of the Board in strategic management
– Monitor• Developments inside and outside the corporation
– Evaluate & Influence• Review proposals, advise, provide suggestions and
alternatives
– Initiate & Determine• Delineate corporation’s mission and specify
strategic options
Prentice Hall, 2004 Chapter 2Wheelen/Hunger
6
Board of Directors Continuum
Prentice Hall, 2004 Chapter 2Wheelen/Hunger
7
Board of Directors
Members:
Inside directors– “Management directors”– Officers or executives employed by
corporation
Outside directors– May be executives of other firms but not
employed by board’s corporation
Prentice Hall, 2004 Chapter 2Wheelen/Hunger
8
Board of Directors
Organization of the Board
• Size– Determined by charter and bylaws– Average for publicly-held, large firm is 11
directors– Average for small/medium private firms is 7 to
8 directors
Prentice Hall, 2004 Chapter 2Wheelen/Hunger
9
Board of DirectorsTop management responsibilities
Top management Responsibilities
•Executive Leadership
•Strategic vision•Presents a role of others to identify with and follow•Communicates high performance standards and shows confidence in followers’ abilities
Prentice Hall, 2004 Chapter 2Wheelen/Hunger
10
Styles of Corporate Governance
High Entrepreneurship Management
Partnership Management
low Chaos Management
Marionette Management
Low High
Degree of Involvement
By top management
Degree of involvement by board of directors
Prentice Hall, 2004 Chapter 2Wheelen/Hunger
11
Styles of Corporate Governance
• Chaos Management• When both the board of directors and top management
have little involvement in the strategic management process.
• The board waits for top management to bring it proposals. • Top management is operationally oriented and continues
to carry out strategies, policies, and programs specified by the founding entrepreneur who died years ago.
• There is no strategic management being done here.
Prentice Hall, 2004 Chapter 2Wheelen/Hunger
12
Styles of Corporate Governance
• Entrepreneurship Management• A corporation with an uninvolved board of
directors but a highly involved top management has entrepreneurship management.
• The board is willing to be used as a rubber stamp for top management's decisions.
• The CEO, operating alone or with a team, dominates the corporation and its strategic decisions.
Prentice Hall, 2004 Chapter 2Wheelen/Hunger
13
Styles of Corporate Governance
• Marionette Management• Probably the rarest form of strategic management style, • marionette management occurs when the board of directors is deeply
involved in strategic decision making, but top management is primarily concerned with operations.
• Such a style evolves when a board is composed of key stockholders who refuse to delegate strategic decision making to the president.
• This style also occurs when a board fires a CEO but is slow to find a replacement.
• Marionette Management occurred at Winnebago Industries when the company's Board of Directors, chaired by its founder, 72-year-old John K. Hanson, took away Ronald Haugen's title as chief executive officer, but left him as company president.
Prentice Hall, 2004 Chapter 2Wheelen/Hunger
14
Styles of Corporate Governance
• Partnership Management• Probably the most effective style of strategic management,• partnership management is epitomized\embodied by a
highly involved board and top management. The board and top management team work closely to establish the corporate mission, objectives, strategies, and policies.
• Board members are active in committee work and utilize strategic audits to provide feedback to top management on its implementations of agreed-upon strategies and policies.
• This appears to be the style emerging in a number of successful corporations such as General Electric Company.
Prentice Hall, 2004 Chapter 2Wheelen/Hunger
15
Social Responsibility
Broader responsibility:
• Private corporation has responsibilities to society that extend beyond making a profit.
Prentice Hall, 2004 Chapter 2Wheelen/Hunger
16
Social Responsibility
Friedman’s Traditional View
“There is one and only one social responsibility of business – to use its resources and engage in activities designed to increase its profits…”
Prentice Hall, 2004 Chapter 2Wheelen/Hunger
17
Social Responsibility
Carroll’s Four Responsibilities
• Economic
• Legal
• Ethical
• Discretionary/flexible
Prentice Hall, 2004 Chapter 2Wheelen/Hunger
18
Responsibilities of Business
Prentice Hall, 2004 Chapter 2Wheelen/Hunger
19
Social Responsibility: Balancing Commitments to Stakeholders
Stakeholders:Stakeholders: Groups, individuals, and organizations that Groups, individuals, and organizations that are directly affected by the practices of an organizationare directly affected by the practices of an organization
Employees Investors
Local Communities
Customers SuppliersCORPORATION
Prentice Hall, 2004 Chapter 2Wheelen/Hunger
20
Social Responsibility
• It refers to the way in which a business tries to balance its commitments to certain groups and individuals in its social environment.
• Customers: Treat customers fairly and honestly (Examples of companies with excellent reputations in this area: L.L. Bean, Nordstrom, Dell Computer Corporation)
• Employees: Treat employees fairly, with respect for their dignity and basic human needs (Examples of companies with excellent reputations in this area: 3M, Southwest Airlines)
• Investors: Manage financial resources honestly and openly• Suppliers: Seek mutually beneficial partnerships• Local Communities: Minimize damage and maximize contributions to
local communities• Discussion: Who are the major stakeholders at your school? How
does the school prioritize these stakeholders? What are your thoughts about this prioritization?
Prentice Hall, 2004 Chapter 2Wheelen/Hunger
21
Reasons for Unethical Behavior
Moral Relativism
– Morality is relative to some personal, social or cultural standard and that there is no method for deciding whether one decision is better than another.
Prentice Hall, 2004 Chapter 2Wheelen/Hunger
22
Social Responsibility
Code of Ethics:– Specifies how an organization
expects its employees to behave while on the job.
Prentice Hall, 2004 Chapter 2Wheelen/Hunger
23
What Is Ethical Behavior?
Ethics: Right and wrong, good and bad, in actions that affect others. shaped by personal values and morals
Ethical Behavior: Conforming to generally accepted ethical norms.Business ethics: Ethical or unethical behaviors of managers and employers of an organization.
Prentice Hall, 2004 Chapter 2Wheelen/Hunger
24
• Encompasses three main areas:
1. Air pollution
2. Water pollution
3. Land pollution– Toxic\deadly waste– Recycling
Responsibility Toward the Environment
Prentice Hall, 2004 Chapter 2Wheelen/Hunger
25
Responsibility Toward Customers
Consumer RightsConsumer Rights
Unfair PricingUnfair Pricing
Ethics in AdvertisingEthics in Advertising
Prentice Hall, 2004 Chapter 2Wheelen/Hunger
26
Responsibility Toward Employees
• Legal and social commitments: Legally, companies are required to refrain from discrimination against any worker based on race, gender, religion, nationality or other irrelevant factors. Ethically, many people feel that companies should ensure that the workplace is physically and socially safe.
• How far should companies extend themselves to help employees who are laid off?
Prentice Hall, 2004 Chapter 2Wheelen/Hunger
27
Responsibility Toward Investors
• Improper financial management:
• Offenses are typically unethical, rather than illegal. Examples include excessive salaries, and lavish\plentiful or frivolous perks\bonus (e.g. regular corporate “retreats” to exotic\interesting island resorts).
• Check kiting:
• Responsibility towards investors has several components:• Illegal practice of writing checks against money that has not yet arrived at the
bank on which it is drawn.
• Insider trading:
• Illegal practice of using confidential information to gain from the purchase or sale of stocks.
• Misrepresentation of finances:
• Typically, this takes the form of overly optimistic projections of earnings.