pre-test & post test analysis sample computations

7/26/2019 Pre-test & Post Test Analysis Sample Computations

1/10

pre-test post-test

22 31

26 27

28 32

28 32

28 34

31 36

32 30

31 32

26 27

31 28

26 37

34 34

30 3630 30

26 25

30 28

28 26

35 33

17 19

ghest 35 37

west 17 19

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 190

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

pre-

test

Pre-Test & Post Test Analysis

Interpretation of Data

The table above shows that pre-test scores ranged from17 to 35 whle37 whch means an ncrease of scores as shown n the gap between the red lne!po%tatstcal &nal'ss showed an average of 303!for posttest and "#3!for pre-test$

Analysis The table reveals that the t %tat s e(#al "179) ths s the mean d*eretest scores$ The p-val#e s 0"1 whch s greater than 01 whch means that the tes

d*erent at 1. level$$on%lsion

&s revealed b' the foregong anal'ss of the data) the nterventons madTranng!/T" for Traners ethodolog' evel has no e*ect wth the tranees$

'e%o((en)ation

/ompetenc'-ased Tranng for nhanced Tranng ethodolog' s there1$ / m#st contan s#cent nformaton and s relevant to the ob ectves$


2/10

2$ %elect methods that are approprate wth the tranng need$3$ rovde approprate co#rse actvtes$


3/10


4/10

est ared Two %ample for eans

Variable 1 Variable 2

an 30$3684210526 28$3684210526

rance 20$0233918129 17$2456140351

servatons 19 19

arson /orrelaton 0$5722806228

pothes;ed ean t" one-tal 0$0214120373

rtcal one-tal 1$7340635923

T=>t" two-tal 0$0428240746rtcal two-tal 2$1009220369

st test scores ranged from 19 toest" and bl#e lne!pretest"$

between the post test and prescores are +,T sgncantl'

#rng the /ompetenc'-ased

e recommended


5/10


6/10


7/10

P'*-T*+T P,+T-T*+T

41 61

49 57

53 62

53 62

53 64

59 6661 60

59 62

49 57

59 58

49 67

65 64

57 66

57 60

49 55

57 58

53 56

67 63

31 49

53$74 60$37

t-Test ared Two %ample for eans

Variable 1 Variable 2

ean 60$3684210526 53$7368421053

arance 20$0233918129 68$9824561404

,bservatons 19 19

earson /orrelaton 0$5722806228

:'pothes;ed ean 0

df 18

t %tat 4$2405044127

!T=>t" one-tal 0$000245961

t /rtcal one-tal 1$7340635923

!T=>t" two-tal 0$000491922

t /rtcal two-tal 2$1009220369

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

re-Test - ost Test &nal'ss

nterpretaton of


8/10

The table above shows that pre-test scores ranged from 31 to49 to 67 whch means ncrease of scores as shown n the gap between thelne!pretest"$ %tatstcal &nal'ss showed an average of 60$37 for posttest

&nal'ss

/omparson between pre-test and posttest #sng pared t-test apre-test and posttest are sgncantl' d*erent wth a p > 0$00025$ Ths m

/oncl#son

&s revealed b' the foregong anal'ss of the data) the nterventased Tranng!/T" for nhanced Tranng ethodolog' e*ectvel' ncre

?ecommendaton

/ompetenc'-ased Tranng for Traners ethodolog' s therefnstt#tons #sng the /ompetenc'-ased Tranng aterals!/"$


9/10

15 16 17 18 19

?-

T%T


10/10

7 whle post test scores ranged fromred lne!posttest" and bl#eand 53$74 for pre-test$

revealed b' the table of val#es showseans that mean scores ncreased$

ons made d#rng the /ompetenc'-sed the learnngs of the tranees$

re recommended for #se n all T%

pre-test & post test analysis sample computations

Documents