pre-susy, bonn, 19-21.8.2010 gudrid moortgat-pick 1 physics at a future linear collider gudrid...
TRANSCRIPT
Pre-SUSY, Bonn, 19-21.8.2010 Gudrid Moortgat-Pick
1
Physics at a future Physics at a future Linear ColliderLinear Collider
Gudrid Moortgat-Pick
Hamburg University, 20.8.2010
• ‘Big’ HEP questions
•LC technical requirements
• LC physics in view of LHC results
• Techniques at the high-energy e+e- collider
• Summary and some literature for further studies
Sceptical thoughts Sceptical thoughts before….before….
• Many options and ideas for experiments– Most are expensive, some ‘rather’ cheap– Should cost be a criteria? Or diversity of the physics
programme?
• Priority lists are needed– Many lists exist (CERN strategy group, P5, UK
roadmaps, German roadmaps…)
• But big experiments require long term planning– To which extent are physics needs in advance
predictable? Particle scales? Physics Models? …
• Can we really weight today all options?– ILC, SLHC, LHeC, CLIC, ν-fact, DLHC, μ-collider,….
Pre-SUSY, Bonn, 19-21.8.2010 Gudrid Moortgat-Pick
2
(My ) Pragmatic (My ) Pragmatic approachapproach
• Physics: what are the ‘big’ questions?– Define steps ... ‘physics milestones’– Identify which models tic which question– Common feature requirements: measure masses,
couplings, spin, quantum numbers … ‘verify at quantum level’
• Machine: next physics milestone achievable?– Technical requirements for a LC have been defined– Synergy with other experiments– Some degree of flexibility required: ‘the unexpected’
Pre-SUSY, Bonn, 19-21.8.2010 Gudrid Moortgat-Pick
3
‘‘Big’ questions …and possible Big’ questions …and possible answersanswers
Pre-SUSY, Bonn, 19-21.8.2010 Gudrid Moortgat-Pick
4
• Shortcomings of the Standard Model
•Establish electroweak symmetry breaking
LC
•Hierarchy problem?
•Unification of all interactions?
•Embedding of gravity
•Baryon asymmetry in Universe?
•Dark matter
•Neutrino mixing and masses
• Why TeV scale?
• Protect hierarchy between mweak and mplanck
• Dark matter consistent with sub-TeV scale WIMPs
Higgs mass with respect to large quantum corrections:
‘‘Big’ questions …and possible Big’ questions …and possible answersanswers
Pre-SUSY, Bonn, 19-21.8.2010 Gudrid Moortgat-Pick
5
• Shortcomings of the Standard Model
•Establish electroweak symmetry breaking
LC
•Hierarchy problem?
LHC, LC
•Unification of all interactions?
LC
•Embedding of gravity
cosmo,LHC, LC
•Baryon asymmetry in Universe? v-, cosmo,
LHC, LC
•Dark matter v-,
cosmo, LHC, LC
•Neutrino mixing and masses v-,
cosmo-exp.
• Why TeV scale?
• Protect hierarchy between mweak and mplanck
• Dark matter consistent with sub-TeV scale WIMPs
‘‘Big’ questions …and possible Big’ questions …and possible answersanswers
Pre-SUSY, Bonn, 19-21.8.2010 Gudrid Moortgat-Pick
6
• Shortcomings of the Standard Model
•Establish electroweak symmetry breaking
LC
•Hierarchy problem?
LHC, LC
•Unification of all interactions?
LC
•Embedding of gravity
cosmo,LHC, LC
•Baryon asymmetry in Universe? v-, cosmo,
LHC, LC
•Dark matter v-,
cosmo, LHC, LC
•Neutrino mixing and masses v-,
cosmo-exp.
• Why TeV scale?
• Protect hierarchy between mweak and mplanck
• Dark matter consistent with sub-TeV scale WIMPs
Why a Linear Collider?
Key features of the e +e-( and γe, γ γ) collider:– Precisely defined and known cms energy of hard process (machine requirements: low beam energy spread, low beamstrahlung)– Tunable cms energy (machine requirements: flexibility, high luminosity)– Polarized initial beams (machine and detector requirements: – Clean and fully reconstructable events (hadronic, invisible) (detector requirements: jet, lepton reconstruction, full hermiticity)– Moderate backgrounds: no trigger required! rather unbiased physics….
Large potential for direct discoveries and via high precision !Pre-SUSY, Bonn, 19-21.8.2010 Gudrid Moortgat-Pick
7
Pre-SUSY, Bonn, 19-21.8.2010 Gudrid Moortgat-Pick 8
The unique advantage of e+e-
• Their clean signatures allow precision measurements
• Sensitive to the theory at quantum level (i.e. contributions of virtual particles, ‘higher orders’)!
• Such measurements allow predictions for effects of still undiscovered particles, but whose properties are defined by theory.
t
At the precision frontier: the LC
Pre-SUSY, Bonn, 19-21.8.2010 Gudrid Moortgat-Pick
9
ICFA Parameter Group
Synergy effects: LHC2FC@CERN 2/09
Questions from early LHC data ( ~10 fb-1 )• ‘Famous’ 3 cases (cf. CERN strategy
documents) :
– LHC not detected anything
– LHC only detected SM-like Higgs
– LHC detected some new physics
• What could the LC do
– in first ILC stage of 90 up to 500 GeV?
– in LC upgrades?
– in multi-TeV CLIC option?Pre-SUSY, Bonn, 19-21.8.2010 Gudrid Moortgat-Pick
10
Nothing found at (early) LHC
• Interpretation for ILC?
– ‘Top’ physics
– indirect searches in bb, cc, l l ( large ED, CI)
– ew precision runs from Z-pole data
• But is then really 500 GeV as first ILC
stage needed?
– or better 350 GeV? High-lumi Z-factory?
Pre-SUSY, Bonn, 19-21.8.2010 Gudrid Moortgat-Pick
11
Pre-SUSY, Bonn, 19-21.8.2010 Gudrid Moortgat-Pick
12
Physics up to sqrt(s)=500 GeV: top
mtop= 173.3 +- 1.1 GeV
Top mass
Pre-SUSY, Bonn, 19-21.8.2010 Gudrid Moortgat-Pick
13
•We expect at the LC:
• From running at tt threshold:• Measurement of a ‘threshold mass parameter’’ with high precision: < 20 MeV •+transition to suitably defined (short-distance) top-quark mass, e.g. MS mass
δmtexp<100 MeV (dominated by theory
uncertainty)
Importance of ‘top’ mass
Pre-SUSY, Bonn, 19-21.8.2010 Gudrid Moortgat-Pick
14
Pre-SUSY, Bonn, 19-21.8.2010 Gudrid Moortgat-Pick
15
EW precision measurements
• GigaZ option at the ILC: – high-lumi running on Z-pole/WW– 109 Z in 50-100 days of running– Needs machine changes (bypass in the current
outline)
• High precision needs polarized beams
• Provides measurement of sin2θW with unprecedented precision!
Electroweak precision data
Pre-SUSY, Bonn, 19-21.8.2010 Gudrid Moortgat-Pick
16
Pre-SUSY, Bonn, 19-21.8.2010 Gudrid Moortgat-Pick
17
Measuring the ew mixing angle
• Measuring the AFB ,
ALR can be interpreted
as measuring sin2θW
• LEP result:
sin2θW=0.23221±0.00029
• SLC result:
sin2θW=0.23098±0.00026
– Discrepancy between AFB and
ALR -> impact on Higgs tests !
mW vs. central value sin2θeff
Pre-SUSY, Bonn, 19-21.8.2010 Gudrid Moortgat-Pick
18
→ Consistent with SM and SUSY
mW vs. SLD-value sin2θeff
Pre-SUSY, Bonn, 19-21.8.2010 Gudrid Moortgat-Pick
19
→ not consistent with the SM
mW vs. LEP -value sin2θeff
Pre-SUSY, Bonn, 19-21.8.2010 Gudrid Moortgat-Pick
20
→ not consistent with neither SM nor SUSY
Pre-SUSY, Bonn, 19-21.8.2010 Gudrid Moortgat-Pick
21
Blondel scheme for GigaZ
Pre-SUSY, Bonn, 19-21.8.2010 Gudrid Moortgat-Pick
22
Relevance in worst case scenariosRelevance in worst case scenarios• Hints for new physics in worst case scenarios:
– Only Higgs @LHC– No hints for SUSY
• Deviations at Zpole
– Hints for SUSY
• Discrepancy
Pre-SUSY, Bonn, 19-21.8.2010 Gudrid Moortgat-Pick
23
SUSY Constraints from GigaZ
What’s needed? What’s needed? ….polarized beams….polarized beams
Pre-SUSY, Bonn, 19-21.8.2010 Gudrid Moortgat-Pick
24
e+ polarization is an absolute novelty! Expected P(e+) ~ 60%
Pre-SUSY, Bonn, 19-21.8.2010 Gudrid Moortgat-Pick
25
Polarized positrons
Pre-SUSY, Bonn, 19-21.8.2010 Gudrid Moortgat-Pick
26
Polarized cross sections in general
Polarized cross sections can be subdivided in:
σRR, σLL, σRL, σLR are contributions with fully polarized L, R beams.
In case of a vector particle only (LR) and (RL) configurations contribute:
Pre-SUSY, Bonn, 19-21.8.2010 Gudrid Moortgat-Pick
27
Effective polarization Effective polarization:
Pre-SUSY, Bonn, 19-21.8.2010 Gudrid Moortgat-Pick
28
Relation between Peff and ALRHow are Peff and ALR related?
That means:
With pure error propagation (and errors uncorrelated), one obtains:
With
Pre-SUSY, Bonn, 19-21.8.2010 Gudrid Moortgat-Pick
29
Gain in accuracy due to P(e+)
Only SM-like Higgs at early LHC
• Interpretation for ILC
– best-suited for studying Higgs properties
– precise determination of couplings:
determination of Hbb is crucial!
– distinction: SM- versus SUSY Higgs– t t H and trilinear Higgs coup. challenging
• But is then really 500 GeV as 1st step needed?– Optimize running scenarios (tunable energy, polarization)
Pre-SUSY, Bonn, 19-21.8.2010 Gudrid Moortgat-Pick
30
Pre-SUSY, Bonn, 19-21.8.2010 Gudrid Moortgat-Pick 31
Determination of Higgs properties
LHC input for optimal choices of running scenarios !
→ Higgs spin
Pre-SUSY, Bonn, 19-21.8.2010 Gudrid Moortgat-Pick
32
Higgs physics at ILC
• Higgs Strahlung WW fusion
Pre-SUSY, Bonn, 19-21.8.2010 Gudrid Moortgat-Pick
33
Higgs mass
• Use Higgsstrahlung: due to well-known initial state and well-observed Z-decays– Derive Higgs mass independently from decay !
– Only possible at a LC!
Pre-SUSY, Bonn, 19-21.8.2010 Gudrid Moortgat-Pick
34
Higgs properties
Something ‘new’ detected at early LHC
• SUSY-like signals (many tics at big questions!)– At least partial spectrum accessible at ILC – ‘light’ SUSY consis- tent with precision fits
• Extra gauge bosons and/or large extra dimensions (some tics at big questions!)– High precision in indirect searches allow
model distinction and couplings determination
Pre-SUSY, Bonn, 19-21.8.2010 Gudrid Moortgat-Pick
35
Goals and features at a Goals and features at a LCLC
• Direct production up to kinematical limit– tunable energy: threshold scans !
• Extremely clean signatures– polarized beams available– impressive potential also for indirect searches via
precision
• Unraveling the structure of NP– precise determination of underlying parameters– model distinction through model independent searches
• High precision measurements– test of the Standard Model (SM) with unprecedented
precision– even smallest hints of NP could be observed
Discovery of new phenomena via high energy
and high precision!Pre-SUSY, Bonn, 19-21.8.2010 Gudrid Moortgat-Pick
36
Pre-SUSY, Bonn, 19-21.8.2010 Gudrid Moortgat-Pick
37
Discovery of SUSY
Pre-SUSY, Bonn, 19-21.8.2010 Gudrid Moortgat-Pick
38
SUSY mass measurement im continuum
Pre-SUSY, Bonn, 19-21.8.2010 Gudrid Moortgat-Pick
39
Masses and spin via threshold scans
• Assume LHC provides mass of a SUSY particle:
Pre-SUSY, Bonn, 19-21.8.2010 Gudrid Moortgat-Pick
40
Mass measurement of the LSP mass
Properties of WIMP’s: Properties of WIMP’s: mass+spinmass+spin
• Reconstruct the `invisible’:
– via recoil mass distribution
Pre-SUSY, Bonn, 19-21.8.2010 Gudrid Moortgat-Pick
41
Pre-SUSY, Bonn, 19-21.8.2010 Gudrid Moortgat-Pick
42
Verify SUSY properties at ILC
Pre-SUSY, Bonn, 19-21.8.2010 Gudrid Moortgat-Pick
43
Slepton `chiral’ quantum numbers
Sensitivity to heavy SUSY Sensitivity to heavy SUSY particles particles
• Challenging scenarios: – multi-TeV sfermions, only few light
gauginos (‘focuspoint-like’) also very difficult for
LHC …
– sensitivity to heavy sneutrinos in t-channel
Pre-SUSY, Bonn, 19-21.8.2010 Gudrid Moortgat-Pick
44
Suitable observable: Precise measurement of asymmetry copes with multi-TeV particles !
Pre-SUSY, Bonn, 19-21.8.2010 Gudrid Moortgat-Pick
45
Free parameters in the MSSM
Pre-SUSY, Bonn, 19-21.8.2010 Gudrid Moortgat-Pick
46
SUSY parameter determination
• Exploit just light SUSY particle spectrum at ILC and determine the parameters (see below)• Combine it with LHC results
via prediction of heavier states
SUSY multi-parameter fits: SUSY multi-parameter fits: LHCLHC
Pre-SUSY, Bonn, 19-21.8.2010 Gudrid Moortgat-Pick
47
SUSY multi parameter fits: SUSY multi parameter fits: LHC+ILCLHC+ILC
Pre-SUSY, Bonn, 19-21.8.2010 Gudrid Moortgat-Pick
48
Aside: Disney World of SUSY Aside: Disney World of SUSY scenariosscenarios
Pre-SUSY, Bonn, 19-21.8.2010 Gudrid Moortgat-Pick
49
Pure particle counting as justification of the energy scale -but what’s about the achievable precision? -but what can be learned via precisions observables at lower energies? (GigaZ, AFB,…)
General feature: in order to be consistent with existing experimental bounds, e.g. with gμ-2:
a few gauginos have to be rather light ! ….sufficient as 1.step
Pre-SUSY, Bonn, 19-21.8.2010 Gudrid Moortgat-Pick
50
Indirect searches: extra dimensions
Pre-SUSY, Bonn, 19-21.8.2010 Gudrid Moortgat-Pick
51
Extra dimensions
Pre-SUSY, Bonn, 19-21.8.2010 Gudrid Moortgat-Pick
52
Physics up to 1 TeV
•Direct search for extra dimensions
Pre-SUSY, Bonn, 19-21.8.2010 Gudrid Moortgat-Pick
53
Direct search for extra dimensions
Pre-SUSY, Bonn, 19-21.8.2010 Gudrid Moortgat-Pick
54
Multi-TeV option at CLIC - Higgs
Pre-SUSY, Bonn, 19-21.8.2010 Gudrid Moortgat-Pick
55
Summary• e+e- physics (LEP, SLC, B-factories) has been the core
of high precision physics over the last decade • We expect a fascinating future in the next years: LHC
will shed first light on the mysteries of EW symmetry breaking
• Rich program and high physics potential of a LC:
The LC will unravel the new physics and enter a new
precision frontier!– Thresholds scans and polarized beams mandatory
• Staged approach of a LC seems reasonable…
Stay tuned for the LHC and the (I)LC!
Pre-SUSY, Bonn, 19-21.8.2010 Gudrid Moortgat-Pick
56
Some literature
• ILC physics: TESLA TDR, physics part hep-ph/0106315
ILC RDR, arXiv:0712.1950
• LHC/ILC interplay: G. Weiglein, Phys. Rept. 426, 47 (2006), hep-ph/0410364
• Polarization+Spin: GMP, POWER report, Phys. Rept. 460,131 (2008), hep-ph/0507011
webpage: www.ippp.dur.ac.uk/LCsources
Pre-SUSY, Bonn, 19-21.8.2010 Gudrid Moortgat-Pick
57
Beam polarization at colliders
Pre-SUSY, Bonn, 19-21.8.2010 Gudrid Moortgat-Pick
58
Electron polarization
Pre-SUSY, Bonn, 19-21.8.2010 Gudrid Moortgat-Pick
59
How to describe the spin?
Pre-SUSY, Bonn, 19-21.8.2010 Gudrid Moortgat-Pick
60
Remarks about couplings structureDefinition: Helicity λ=s * p/|p| ‘projection of spin’
Chirality = handedness is equal to helicity only of m=0!
Pre-SUSY, Bonn, 19-21.8.2010 Gudrid Moortgat-Pick
61
General remarks, cont.
Pre-SUSY, Bonn, 19-21.8.2010 Gudrid Moortgat-Pick
62
Background suppression
Dark matter analysis at LC• High precision in parameter determination
required for reliable DM prediction– Parameter ranges where abrupt changes of
neutralino character happen
– Precise determination of M1,M2….required
Pre-SUSY, Bonn, 19-21.8.2010 Gudrid Moortgat-Pick
63
V. Morton-Thurtle