practical language-based solutions for children who need aac · practical language-based solutions...
TRANSCRIPT
Practical Language-Based
Solutions for Children who Need
AAC Fostering Expressive Language & Communication Skills
Cathy Binger, Ph.D., CCC-SLP
University of New Mexico
Utah State University 2012 Summer Seminars
in Speech-Language Pathology
ASHA’s SIG 12 Conference
First ever online SIG 12 Conference Co-chairs: ◦ Cathy Binger & Jennifer Kent-Walsh
Focus: ◦ Partner Instruction in AAC
Speakers: ◦ David Beukelman, Laura Ball, Cathy Binger, Nancy Brady,
Lynn Fox, Ann Kaiser, Jennifer Kent-Walsh, Joanne Lasker, David McNaughton, Billy Ogletree, MaryAnn Romski, Rose Sevcik, Gloria Soto, Kathy Thiemann-Bourque, and more!
Dates: ◦ June 13-25
More info http://www.asha.org/Events/aac-conf/default
USU Seminars Binger 2012
Overview
This morning:
• Role of AAC in Communication
• Language Goals for Children who use AAC
• Developing Communication Boards
• Providing Communication Opportunities: Case Studies
This afternoon:
• Selecting Skills to Teach Communication Partners
• Exploration of the ImPAACT Program: Communication Partner Instruction
USU Seminars Binger 2012
My Background
Clinical SLP for 8 years ◦ Worked in many settings Birth-3/preschools, elementary & middle school Group homes/ sheltered workshops Hospital out-patient, private practice
◦ With lots of folks who needed AAC
Professor specializing in AAC for 8 years ◦ Research foci: Building language skills with children who need AAC Teaching communication partners how to facilitate communication
with these children New NIH grant: Teaching linguistic rules to preschoolers using graphic
symbols
USU Seminars Binger 2012
How I Like to Conduct Presentations
• Interactive, even in big groups like this one
• Please ask for clarification
• Please ask questions
USU Seminars Binger 2012
ROLE OF AAC IN COMMUNICATION
USU Seminars Binger 2012
Role of AAC in Communication
AAC is a TOOL
◦ GOAL = Improved daily life communication
◦ TOOL = AAC
◦ GOAL ≠ Using AAC
AAC is about COMMUNICATION
USU Seminars Binger 2012
Role of AAC in Communication
AAC use is never an outcome in and of itself
Devices cannot accomplish anything in and of themselves ◦ Nothing magical about using AAC
Devices are TOOLS to reach the same goals as clients who rely on speech ◦ Increase/improve Participation Academic/employment outcomes Social skills Language skills
USU Seminars Binger 2012
Role of AAC in Communication
• Improving daily life communication
Focus
• Very similar to non-AAC clients; e.g.,
• Improve spoken syntax
• Expand expressive vocabulary, etc. Goals
• Therefore, we will discuss AAC devices within the context of communication
• NOT the features of each device in isolation Context
USU Seminars Binger 2012
AAC is much less intimidating when viewed this way!
LANGUAGE GOALS FOR CHILDREN WHO USE AAC
USU Seminars Binger 2012
Language Goals for Children who use AAC
Pragmatics
• Turn-taking
• Commenting
• Asking questions
• NOT just requesting!!!
Semantics
• Vocabulary size
• Vocabulary diversity
Morphology
• Grammatical morphemes
Syntax
• Message length and complexity
• Early language rules
USU Seminars Binger 2012
Our research has focused on:
Receptive-Expressive Gaps
• Test receptive language formally
May need to make adaptations for physical limitations
• Use standardized, normed tests that require NO
verbal output from child; e.g.,
USU Seminars Binger 2012
PPVT
TACL (Test of Auditory Language Comprehension)
CASL (Comprehensive Ax of Spoken Lang)
CELF-P (some sections)
TOLD-P (Test of Language Devp – Primary)
Do NOT use
the PLS:
Requires
verbal
output
Receptive-Expressive Gaps
• Determine age-equivalent score on test
• This is the age to aim for expressively. E.g.,
– Child’s age = 5;0
– Receptive age = 3;0
– Expressive expectations = ???
• What are your expectations for language for a
child who is 3 years old?
USU Seminars Binger 2012
Receptive-Expressive Gaps
• Even if there is a big gap between chronological age and receptive age You may be underestimating expressive capability
• Many children simply lack:
USU Seminars Binger 2012
Tools The tools to do more
expressively
Expectations The expectation that they can do more expressively
There are (many) exceptions, of course
Low level symbolism; pre-symbolic communicators
DEVELOPING COMMUNICATION BOARDS
USU Seminars Binger 2012
Vocabulary Selection Techniques (Beukelman & Mirenda, 2005)
• Environmental inventory
– Observe and document what peers are saying during that activity
– Analyze and document vocabulary needed for activities
• Books, other curricular materials
• Recipes
• Etc.
USU Seminars Binger 2012
Environmental Inventory Example
• Provide the person using AAC with this same vocabulary
USU Seminars Binger 2012
List of ingredients
List of cooking utensils
“This looks delicious!”
“We need some spices.”
Etc.
Additional Techniques
• Aided AAC Modeling When you model using AAC, you will quickly
figure out what vocabulary is missing
• Core vocabulary lists http://aac.unl.edu/vocabulary.html
• Fringe vocabulary questionnaires • Fallon & Light, 2001; http://ajslp.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/10/1/81
• Analysis of materials & activities IEP goals, curriculum, daily/classroom activities
USU Seminars Binger 2012
Example Goals: Pragmatics
Whole phrases
• Take quick communication turns
• That sounds great!
• Tell me more!
• Can you ask me that again?
• That’s not my favorite.
Single words/ concepts
• Can use for different communicative functions
• E.g., If the person says SALT while cooking, it can mean:
• Please get the salt
• Where is the salt?
• This needs more salt
• That’s too much salt
• Etc.
USU Seminars Binger 2012
Increase turn-taking
Pragmatic Goals, con’t
Whole phrases
• How are you?
• What have you been up to?
• I would like to hear more about that.
Single words
• Can use in a wide variety of situations
• Who?
• What?
• Where?
• When?
• Why?
• How?
USU Seminars Binger 2012
Ask partner-focused questions
Example Goals: Semantics
Include core vocabulary
• Vocabulary used by everyone in a wide variety of contexts
• Word lists of core vocabulary are available in English • http://aac.unl.edu/vocabula
ry.html
• Examples: mother, father, big, little, easy, hard, hand, is, like, lunch
Include fringe vocabulary
• Specific to various contexts or activities • E.g., vocabulary needed to
discuss a storybook or complete a cooking activity
• Specific to the individual • Names of friends, family,
pets
USU Seminars Binger 2012
Increase expressive vocabulary
Collecting Fringe Vocabulary
Provide family/ educators with a questionnaire
• Fallon & Light, 2001; http://ajslp.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/10/1/81
Conduct environmental inventories
• Write down what others say in this context
• Examine curriculum materials
• Provide the person using AAC with this same vocabulary
USU Seminars Binger 2012
Example Goals: Syntax
Agent + action + object
• Example context: Storybooks
• Select relevant vocabulary from each book
• Example sentence:
• EMILY ELIZABETH RIDES CLIFFORD
USU Seminars Binger 2012
Increase sentence length
Organizing Vocabulary
• Individual symbols
• Visual Scene Displays
• Communication books
• Grids
– Low technology
– High technology
USU Seminars Binger 2012
Individual Symbols
• Use with individuals who are emerging symbolic communicators
USU Seminars Binger 2012
Visual Scene Display: Photo
• Use with individuals who are emerging symbolic communicator
• Easy to find concepts on one page
USU Seminars Binger 2012
Visual Scene Display: Line Drawings
• Hard to move into building sentences
• Move on to individual symbols and grids as soon as you can
USU Seminars Binger 2012
Visual Scene Display: High Tech Device
• Adult visual scene display – This one is for a trip to
Canberra
• Each symbol links to other pages
USU Seminars Binger 2012
• Visual Scene Displays for Adults with Acquired Disorders
– Focuses on people w/ aphasia – http://www.aac-
rerc.com/pages/news/pdfs/AAC%20and%20Aphasia%20A%20Review%20of%20Visual%20Scenes%20Display%20Project%20handouts.pdf
USU Seminars Binger 2012
Communication Books
• Can set up in many different ways
• Some symbols can be visible at all times
• Can use tabs USU Seminars Binger 2012
Simple Grids
• Use grids as soon as the client can!
• Enables the client to build simple sentences
• Can color code by morphemes or concepts
In English: by words
USU Seminars Binger 2012
More Complex Grid
• This one is for a storybook
USU Seminars Binger 2012
Another Moderately Complex Grid
• This one is for a 4 year old who loves to play with dolls
USU Seminars Binger 2012
Picture WordPowerTM Grid
• A more complex grid for someone learning to spell
USU Seminars Binger 2012
How to Select the Form & Layout
Do
• Consider personal needs
• E.g., communication in the tub
• Consider diagnosis
• E.g., aphasia, autism
• Ensure access to low-tech backup
Don’t
• Automatically select grids
• Automatically select high tech devices (only)
• Base decisions solely on diagnosis
• E.g., autism = PECS
USU Seminars Binger 2012
PROVIDING COMMUNICATION OPPORTUNITIES
Case Studies
USU Seminars Binger 2012
Providing Communication Opportunities
• Let’s start by looking at two videos
• Notice differences with
– What the teacher is doing
– What the child is doing
USU Seminars Binger 2012
What’s Different in the 2nd Video?
Teacher
• Expects communication
• Provides extra wait time
• Delayed processing
• Provides models using child’s expected mode
• Asks WH questions
• Responds contingently
Child
• Pragmatically •Takes communicative turns
•Points to pictures in the story
•Answers questions
•Vocalizes
• Linguistically •Uses speech
•Uses words on the AAC device
•Puts words together using the AAC device
USU Seminars Binger 2012
Necessary but not Sufficient Conditions
• Even in the first video, we had
Identified motivating contexts for communication
Developed appropriate communication boards
Selected appropriate vocabulary
Organized vocabulary appropriately
These steps are necessary but not sufficient for communicative success
Communication partners must change how they interact with AAC clients
USU Seminars Binger 2012
What is “Timmy” Doing and Not Doing, Communication-Wise?
Timmy is doing a lot pragmatically Taking communicative turns
Pointing to what he wants
Using gestures to communicate
Answering questions
Vocalizing
Timmy is not Using words to communicate
USU Seminars Binger 2012
False Assumptions
• Many clinicians would assume that we should start with very basic goals
• Using single symbols to communicate
• However, his receptive language abilities are strong
• 3 year old range
He understands many linguistic structures
If his speech were not impaired, he would be using full sentences
Don’t aim too low!
USU Seminars Binger 2012
Differences between the 1st and Last 2 Videos
Teacher
• Major change: Use of aided AAC modeling
• This can make all the difference!
Child
• Communicating LINGUISTICALLY, not just pragmatically
• Using syntax rules with graphic symbols
USU Seminars Binger 2012
Lessons from Timmy
• Don’t hold your clients back
USU Seminars Binger 2012
Provide clients with the communication solutions they need
• Use highly motivating contexts
• Provide easy access to appropriate vocabulary
• Expect success
• Teach language
Challenge your clients!
• Expect them to keep improving
• Increase expectations every time they improve
Ray’s Choice Book & Schedule Board
USU Seminars Binger 2012
Lessons from Ray
“Doable chunks”
• Figure out how long a child can attend to a given task, honor that, and build from there
The power of visual schedules
• Helps keep client on task
• Fewer challenging behaviors
• Can put their energies into effective and socially appropriate communication
• Can place them ALL OVER classrooms/ home/ etc.
• Between task schedules
• Within task schedules
USU Seminars Binger 2012
Autism Case Study: Corbin
• Age = ~ 3;6
• Could not test receptive language
• Participated in a story reading intervention study
• What communicative behaviors do you see?
USU Seminars Binger 2012
Changing Ix: Part I
• Change #1
– Make activities more motivating
– Liked Dr. Seuss better than Little Critter
USU Seminars Binger 2012
Intervention, Part II: Making Changes
Chose more motivating activities
•Or better yet, we let him choose
Simplified AAC
•Did not give up on AAC, as he is clearly
•Symbolic
• In need of communication modes in addition speech
Modeled multiple communication modes
•Aided AAC
•Unaided AAC (manual signs)
Used SAME Ix techniques we’d use with anyone else
•See if you can identify….
USU Seminars Binger 2012
Ix Techniques
• What ix techniques did you see that you’d use with any child? – Capitalizing on current communication modes
• Vocalizing • Showing by ‘using’ others; taking Mom’s hand (Level III
communication behavior)
– Modeling – Pausing/ expectant delay – Pointing toward device – Providing hand-over-hand models only when other cues failed – Providing contingent responses
• Only difference: provided AAC options to ‘up the ante’ of communication
USU Seminars Binger 2012
Lessons Learned from Corbin
Any motivating activity can be a context for communication
• Client motivation is key
• Not much point in communicating otherwise
Map AAC on to current communication attempts
• Same as you would for clients who speak
• Tools just change a bit (sign/voice output instead of speech)
Try multiple modes
• Never know what will or will not work
USU Seminars Binger 2012
Providing Communication Opportunities: Summary
Identify meaningful contexts
Select appropriate vocabulary & modes
Organize vocabulary in a meaningful manner
Use visual schedules and other supports to
minimize challenging behaviors
Ensure communication partners use techniques
to encourage communication
USU Seminars Binger 2012
Multiple steps
are involved in
creating
meaningful
communication
opportunities