ppt
TRANSCRIPT
Air Deccan Implementing the Low Cost Model in India
CASE STUDY
Made By: Group 11
Rachit Tiwari
Piyush Kumar Raghav
Gaurav Kumar Agarwal
Pankaj Jain
Namit modi
Devendra Tadhiyal
R K Soni
Made By: Group 11
Rachit Tiwari
Piyush Kumar Raghav
Gaurav Kumar Agarwal
Pankaj Jain
Namit modi
Devendra Tadhiyal
R K Soni
The Indian economy has grown at an
average rate of around 8% in the last decade: The rise in business
and leisure travel (both domestic
and international
Since 2003, when low fare travel in India
was ushered in, a number of low
cost carriers (LCC) have
entered to serve this fast growing
market
However, all of the LCC carriers and—with rare exceptions—even the full
service carriers (FSC) charging
higher fares have been making
losses.
Operating a commercial
airline in India so far has not been
a profitable business
An Overview
Major players in the Industry
Positioning of Different Carriers:
BOOM AND BUST IN INDIAN AVIATION INDUSTRY
Monopoly of Air India and Indian Airlines
The Emergence of a New Indian Airline Industry
In 2003, Captain Gopinath’s started Air DeccanThus, began the boom phase in the airlines industry .
Restructuring of the Industry
Jet-Sahara merger
Kingfisher-Air Deccan merger
Air India-Indian Airlines
merger
Point to point service
Do not provide frills
Minimum number of air hostesses on the flight
Removing business class, storage space for the meals and limited seat pitch
do not issue tickets to Passengers
Try to minimize capital costs and costs of the crew and hangerage
Save on distribution costs
Low Cost Carriers:
Air Deccan
• Empowering every Indian to flyVision:
• To demystify air travel by providing reliable, low cost and safe travel to the common man by constantly driving down the fares as an on going mission.
Mission:
Corporate (middle-level employees),
small and medium
enterprises (SMEs),
AC/ Second class travelers (middle class)
of Indian Railways.
Air Deccan’s targeting
Concentrated on unconnected regional areas
Two pronged fleet strategy
Lease with AIRBUS
Quick turnaround
High Frequency
Lean Staffing
Reduced expenses on Cabin crew
Booking/customer touch points
Dynamic fare pricing
The Business Strategy
Expansion Plans
Open to
Foreign
investments
as well as
buyouts
Convenience
to
passengers
Ancillary Revenues
Automation to sustain expansion
Strategies for Future sustenance
Airlines No. of aircrafts No. of Flights (daily)
Utilization of aircraft (Flights/Aircraft)
Average fleet age (in years)
Air India 108 - - 11.9
Jet Airways 87 400 4.597 4.5
Kingfisher Airlines 75 218 2.906 2.2
JetLite 24 250 10.416 6.5
Sweating its assets
No Frills
This means that it does not offer any complementary services offered by other full-service airlines.
Complimentary services include multi-cuisine food, airport lounges, magazines, entertainment, etc.
Incur not only the basic cost of food but also the cost of oven, microwave, preheated food cabins and serving trolleys.
Moreover, the aircraft becomes lighter as a result of offloading of heating appliances which increases the fuel efficiency of the aircraft.
This reduces costs associated with food, appliances, heating and serving (stewards and stewardess) thus, resulting in major costs savings.
Online booking and IVR ticketing
Eliminates the need for commissions payable to
middlemen.
Obviates the need of ticketing agents and additional
workers, thus cutting down the wage bill.
The paperwork associated with transactions is
considerably reduced.
The tickets are sent online to the email address of the
customer and the customer can get a printout of the
ticket himself.
Cuts the cost of transactions resulting in lower ticket
prices.
• The tickets are priced according to the availability and demand of tickets.
• The marginal cost of flying an additional customer is very low.
• It earns its revenues not only from the sale of tickets but also from the sale of food items and any other service for which it charges over and above the price of the ticket.
Dynamic Pricing
The airline plans to offer the fuselage, the exterior of the aircraft body, and
in-flight space for advertising.
It is expected to generate revenues worth Rs 50-60 lakh
a month from the move.
Advertising revenues
Low cost or Value carrier ??
CORPORATE STRATEGY AND CUSTOMER FOCUS
To offer its passengers a consistent, quality-assured and time efficient performance at affordable fares.
Targets the 1st, 2nd and 3rd A/C Railway passengers and Volvo Bus Passengers.
Fares - 40% lower than traditional airlines
HUB MODEL• Emulates point-to-point strategy of South
West Airlines• first increases flights in the existing network – spreads costs across different overheads. It utilize
crew, fuel and aircraft more.• Used mostly in metros and Tier-2– Higher income levels : higher occupancy rate– Better infrastructure
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
Repositioning to Value Carrier Airlines– Kingfisher Red– GoAir to GoComfort– JetLite
AIRLINE TYPES OF AIRCRAFTS
JetLite Boeing 737 series and Canadian Regional Jets 200 Series.
GoAir Airbus A320s (leased and purchased)
SpiceJet Boeing 737-800Boeing 737-900
Indigo Airbus A320
AirDeccan/Kingfisher Red 48 and 72 seater ATRs on the regional routes and the 180-seater A320 on the trunk routes.
2. Fleet Of Aircraft Utilized
AIRLINE MODEL ADOPTED
JetLite Point to point between metros, hub-n-spoke for non-metros to metros and vice-versa or between non-metros
GoAir Hub/Point-to-point model
SpiceJet Point-to-point, and regional hub-n-spoke
Indigo Point-to-point model
AirDeccan/Kingfisher Red Hub-n-spoke model
3. Models adopted
Low cost v/s low fare• Spice Jet has lowest unit cost at 6.2 cents per ASK;
– Comparable with Southwest, Easy Jet, and Jet Blue. Twice that of Air Asia with unit cost of 3 cents per ASK.
• Usually, LCCs provide point-to-point service while FSCs work on hub-and-spoke system. – Air Deccan has deviated from the LCC business model ;
has a hub-and-spoke model to connect metros with towns.
– This has increased its costs. Bill Franke, Managing Director of leading airline investmentfirm Indigo Partners – “There is not a single airline in India that operates a true low cost
structure, only low-fare and low-margin.”
Is the LCC business model in India sustainable?
• Low-fare airlines have common features.– Easy to replicate and are integral to LCC in India. As a result, they do not
offer a sustainable competitive advantage.
• Typically, a low-fare airline chooses routes that are not already operated by other low-fare airlines. – Head-on competition -> price war -> benefits consumers -> not profitable
to the airlines.
• Government has to improve airport infrastructure if this model is to succeed.– Increase in air traffic not matched with the increase in the infrastructure;
leads to long halts and waiting of these planes, delays besides loss of precious air fuel.
• Shorthaul services impose cost disadvantages. – Quick turnarounds to achieve high utilization become critical.
• Air fuel constitute the largest share of expenses.– The under-developed commodity hedging market puts a stumbling
block on these companies to hedge against fluctuating prices of air fuel.
• The cost of procuring new fleet. Aircrafts need to have at least 80% occupancy of seats to be viable in long run. – Must explore low-cost routes, less time taking routes, rather than
hauling on the same popular routes, if they wish to remain viable in long run.
• Requirement for trained commanders to operate these flights.– Severe demand supply gap -> price hike -> increasing cost.
Future Outlook• Chased market share, i.e., revenue maximization and forced the
incumbents to match their low prices. – While revenue maximization is a good short term strategy to enter the
market, sooner or later, LCCs have to be become profitable. – 2 outcomes — either they go bust in a market shake-out or they
merge/get acquired by other airlines.
Near term challenges– Realizing the benefits of the consolidations.– Realigning their competitive strategies to become profitable. – Pursuing aggressive cost reduction. – The availability of capital. – Constraints due to poor infrastructure for aviation in India.
Not new among foreign low-cost carriers; have either merged or sold off their business due to long-run un-sustainability.