ppcr monitoring and reporting toolkit - …...climate responsive instruments/ investment models are...

PPCRMONITORING

ANDREPORTING

TOOLKIT

2018PPCRPILOT PROGRAM FOR CLIMATE RESILIENCE

ON COVER: Rehabilitated canals in Zambia, supported by PPCR, can better regulate water supply during drought and flood seasons.

© Lorie Rufo/CIF

PPCRMONITORING

ANDREPORTING

TOOLKIT

2018PPCRPILOT PROGRAM FOR CLIMATE RESILIENCE

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSThe revised PPCR Monitoring and Reporting Toolkit

(2018) is the outcome of the PPCR monitoring and

reporting stocktaking review that assessed the firsthand

experiences of PPCR pilot countries and multilateral

development banks that implemented the original

PPCR M&R Toolkit from 2014 to 2017. This collaborative,

consultative review culminated in a final validation

workshop attended by 21 PPCR countries, regional

organizations, multilateral development banks, observers,

and donor countries. This toolkit reflects a common

understanding of monitoring and reporting and a common

set of indicators within and across all PPCR countries.

The CIF Administrative Unit expresses its sincerest

appreciation to all those who contributed to this effort.

| 3 |

1.OVERVIEW: PPCR MONITORING AND REPORTING SYSTEM

5Participatory, programmatic approach 6

Key components and roles 6

M&R from design to finish 11

CONTENTS

ANNEXES

552.PROCESS: PPCR COUNTRY REPORTING

13Core indicators13

Step by step15

3.TOOLS: REPORTING AND TECHNICAL GUIDANCE

21PPCR Core Indicator 122

PPCR Core Indicator 228




Early PPCR project results from Nepal indicate that by 2016, over 15,000 farmers, including 6,500 women, were trained on adopting water management practices and higher-yielding crop varieties that are more resilient to extreme weather conditions like drought.

© Naresh Newar/Thomson Reuters Foundation

| 5 |

As the scale and volume of climate change

adaptation finance grows worldwide, so do

the number of climate resilience activities and

the need for data to inform decision making

and demonstrate progress toward national,

regional, and international goals, such as

the Sustainable Development Goals and the

Paris Agreement. Countries require strong

monitoring and evaluation systems to collect

and report accurate, timely, and harmonized

data that can be used to strengthen projects

and programs, promote accountability, and gain

financial support.

The Pilot Program for Climate Resilience

(PPCR), a targeted program of the

USD 8.3 billion Climate Investment

Funds (CIF), is a pioneer in climate

finance monitoring and results reporting.

1.OVERVIEW PPCR MONITORING AND REPORTING SYSTEM

Created in 2008, PPCR is a USD 1.2 billion

concessional financing mechanism

designed to pilot and demonstrate ways

to integrate climate risk management and

resilience into core development planning

and complement ongoing activities in

developing countries around the world. It

has established a monitoring and reporting

(M&R) system that supports recipient

countries in their efforts to track progress

in climate resilience action.

Unique in the global climate finance architecture,

this system is founded on the principles of

country ownership and multi-stakeholder

participation, with a focus on learning as

much as tracking program results. This toolkit

offers practical guidance to in-country PPCR

stakeholders on enabling the PPCR M&R system.

| 6 |

PPCR MONITORING AND REPORTING TOOLKIT

PRINCIPLES OF PPCR M&R SYSTEM Country Ownership

The PPCR M&R system is country-driven, managed in-country by the PPCR country focal point and supported by the MDBs.

Participatory Approach

Local stakeholders actively contribute to the system. This approach empowers beneficiaries, builds country ownership, fosters knowledge exchange, and ensures accountability and transparency.

Use of Mixed Methods

The system combines quantitative and qualitative methods to collect, analyze, and generate knowledge and lessons on implementing PPCR investments.

Learning-by-Doing This is a living system designed to evolve and adapt over time. It recognizes that monitoring and reporting is an iterative, learning-driven process. The system is reviewed and improved continuously as lessons are generated around its use.

PARTICIPATORY, PROGRAMMATIC APPROACH Like all CIF programs, PPCR fosters a

programmatic approach to investment planning

and implementation. Working through a

transparent, country-led process that engages a

range of stakeholders—including government

ministries, civil society, indigenous peoples,

private sector, and the multilateral development

banks (MDBs) that implement PPCR funding1—

PPCR supports each country in developing

a Strategic Program for Climate Resilience

(SPCR). This program coherently links a series

of actions and investments that mutually

reinforce each other and build on National

Adaptation Programs of Action and other

national development programming.

Under national government leadership with

support from the MDBs, PPCR stakeholders

continue to work together to implement the

SPCR. They use the PPCR M&R system to

track the performance of PPCR investments

and ensure accountability, learning, progress,

and results in advancing climate-resilient

development. This commitment to an inclusive,

programmatic approach from investment design

to completion is time intensive, but serves to

enrich the entire process for maximized results.

KEY COMPONENTS AND ROLES The PPCR M&R system is structured to enable

annual tracking and reporting on PPCR progress

at multiple levels—from project to country

1 All CIF funding and technical support is implemented in recipient countries via partner MDBs: African Development Bank (AfDB), Asian Development Bank (ADB), European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) and World Bank Group, including International Finance Corporation (IFC).

1. OVERVIEW PPCR MONITORING AND REPORTING SYSTEM

| 7 |

PPCR CORE INDICATORS

1 Degree of integration of climate change in national, including

sector, planning

2 Evidence of strengthened government capacity and

coordination mechanism to mainstream climate resilience

3 Quality and extent to which climate responsive instruments/

investment models are developed and tested (optional)

4 Extent to which vulnerable households, communities,

businesses, and public-sector services use improved PPCR-supported tools, instruments, strategies, and activities to respond to climate variability or climate change

5 Number of people supported by PPCR to cope with the effects of

climate change

to global program. It calls on participants

from PPCR countries, MDBs, and the CIF

Administrative Unit to make it function.

The system rests on the foundation of the PPCR results framework2, which serves as the

basis for monitoring and reporting the impacts,

outcomes, and outputs of all PPCR-funded

activities. Over time and based on user feedback,

the PPCR results framework has streamlined

the use of five core indicators that every PPCR

country is required to monitor and report

on annually over the lifetime of their SPCR.

These indicators cover resilient development

planning, adaptive capacity, decision making, and

innovative investment approaches and are meant

to reflect the expected transformation process

taking place in PPCR countries (see Annex 1).

The PPCR results framework is designed

to guide countries and MDBs in further

developing their own results frameworks to

track progress in climate resilience action.

Such built-in flexibility is meant to ensure

that PPCR-relevant results and indicators are

integrated into pre-existing monitoring and

evaluation systems at the country and project/

program level. The CIF Administrative Unit and

partner MDBs support PPCR pilot countries

in developing participatory, country-led M&R

processes based on need and upon request.

The PPCR M&R system provides for two

complementary streams of annual data

collection and reporting: country reporting,

which takes place at the national level and

2 This toolkit refers to the Revised PPCR Results Framework approved by the PPCR Sub-Committee in 2012. See Annex 1.

| 8 |


PPCR MONITORING AND REPORTING SYSTEMTracking the performance of PPCR investments to ensure accountability, learning, progress, and results in advancing climate-resilient development

COUNTRY REPORTING

Annual, national-level results data collected and reported by PPCR countries

Involving annual scoring workshop with multiple stakeholders, completing PPCR M&R scorecards and tables

Upholds 4 principles of PPCR M&R: country ownership, stakeholder engagement, use of mixed methods, and learning by doing

MDB REPORTING

Annual, detailed project-level results data collected and reported by MDBs

Uses MDB implementation status reports or equivalent

Complements country reporting to provide a more comprehensive picture of PPCR performance throughout the program cycle

PPCR RESULTS FRAMEWORK5 core indicators ��

Annual PPCR operations and results report to the PPCR Sub-Committee

produced by the CIF Administrative Unit with reporting from all PPCR countries and MDBs

YOU ARE HERE

This toolkit provides guidance on the country

reporting process


| 9 |

is led by countries in a participatory fashion,

and MDB reporting, which involves MDBs

providing project-level data directly to the CIF

Administrative Unit.

Country reporting is fundamental to the

PPCR and a hallmark of its programmatic,

participatory approach. It is the primary focus of this toolkit. As the main administrator of

PPCR in-country activities, the PPCR country

focal point oversees country reporting to

produce an annual national-level PPCR results

report for submission to the CIF Administrative

Unit by June 30 of each year.

This involves annual data collection and

results reporting on the five core indicators

through a process that engages a range of

in-country PPCR stakeholder groups. They

can include government institutions at

national, sub-national, and local levels; civil

society; indigenous peoples; academia; and

the private sector. At the invitation of the

PPCR country focal point, they gather at an

annual PPCR scoring workshop to discuss

progress made in implementing the SPCR,

share lessons learned, and identify feasible

solutions to challenges.

MDB reporting is designed to complement

country reporting data with more granular

and intermediary project-level results data

reported directly to the CIF Administrative

Unit by the MDBs on an annual basis.

Like all CIF programs, PPCR financing

is implemented in recipient countries

by multiple partner MDBs that monitor

and report on projects through their own

institutional arrangements. To satisfy

M&R ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES* PPCR country focal point

Manages the national PPCR M&R process, particularly preparing and facilitating annual scoring workshop, including:

- Identifying attendees - Gathering, presenting, and storing

evidence base - Finalizing annual country results report

for submission to the CIF Administrative Unit by June 30 of each year

Lead MDB representative

Supports the PPCR focal point in this effort

In-country PPCR stakeholders

Participate in annual scoring workshop to track PPCR progress at the national level; may include government, civil society, indigenous peoples, private sector, academia, and others

In-country project manager

Supports data collection for annual scoring exercise; participates in workshop

MDB HQ focal point

Provides annually implementation status report or equivalent for each project under their implementation to the CIF Administrative Unit by June 30 of each year; supports their project implementation teams to carry out their PPCR M&R responsibilities, including scoring workshop participation

CIF Administrative Unit

Collects and aggregates national and project reporting from all PPCR countries and MDBs to produce the annual PPCR program-level operations and results report for the PPCR Sub-Committee by November of each year

* E

xact

tit

les

and

res

po

nsi

bili

ties

var

y as

det

erm

ined

by

cou

ntr

y

| 10 |


M&R CONSIDERATIONS THROUGHOUT PPCR PROGRAMING CYCLE

3 IMPLEMENTATION Once the first project

begins implementation, annual country reporting begins. Project teams collect project-level results data and country focal point organizes annual scoring exercise.

2 PROJECT PREPARATION

MDBs develop detailed results framework for each project, incorporating relevant PPCR core indicators, as well as protocols for collecting the requisite data.

1 SPCR DESIGN Country establishes

a results framework for the SPCR, incorporating indicators and guidance from the PPCR results framework.

4 CONCLUSION As projects close,

MDBs assess them against project-level targets. Country reporting continues until the final project reaches its completion date. Lessons learned implementing PPCR investments feed future projects and programs.


| 11 |

PPCR’s MDB reporting requirement, each

MDB typically submits its most recent

implementation status report, or equivalent,

for each project under its implementation.

Because this element of the PPCR M&R

system depends on each MDB’s prescribed

policies, practices, and indicators, this

toolkit does not provide specific guidance on

MDB reporting.

M&R FROM DESIGN TO FINISH The PPCR M&R system facilitates a

continuous, iterative cycle that spans the

entire lifetime of a SPCR. It necessitates that

PPCR national and project teams, MDBs,

and other stakeholders anticipate their data,

monitoring, and reporting needs from the

SPCR design phase all the way through to

completion of the final project implemented

under the SPCR.

The system is designed to operate within existing

national monitoring and evaluation systems

and avoid parallel structures or processes

to track PPCR progress and performance.

For countries with low national monitoring

capacities, the lead MDB—which the country

designates in its SPCR to liaise on administrative

matters at the national level—can provide

additional support to enhance in-country

capacity to monitor and report on PPCR results.

This flexibility ensures the PPCR M&R system

remains country-led and aligned to national

processes even as they evolve and strengthen

with PPCR and MDB involvement. ¢

“The PPCR monitoring and reporting process has been very beneficial for our country. It has helped to reverse the silos between some national institutions and to improve collaboration between the public administration and other development stakeholders.”Chaibou Dan Bakoye, PPCR Niger M&E Expert

Surveyor Silva Thembe takes the GPS altitude on a water-control canal for the Baixo Limpopo Irrigation and Climate Resilience Project in Mozambique. Supported by the PPCR, the project is helping to climate proof infrastructure against flooding and drought and increase agricultural productivity for high-value crops.

© Jeffrey Barbee/Thomson Reuters Foundation

| 13 |

The PPCR country focal point is responsible

for leading the annual country data collection

and reporting process, beginning once the first

project of the SPCR starts implementation and

continuing until the final project concludes.

He/She submits the annual country results

report to the CIF Administrative Unit by no

later than June 30 of each year. The reporting

period is twelve months, from January 1

to December 31 of the previous year, and

indicates progress on the five core indicators

of the PPCR results framework.

2.PROCESS PPCR COUNTRY REPORTING

CORE INDICATORS Every PPCR country is expected to report on

these five core indicators over the lifetime of

their SPCR, with the option to forgo Indicator

3 if a country deems the requisite information

is sufficiently captured in Indicator 4. As the

table illustrates, these five core indicators

measure progress at either the national or

project/program level, and there are different

PPCR-provided instruments (scorecards or

tables) to collect data based on indicator type

(qualitative or quantitative). Section 3 of this

toolkit describes in depth these core indicators,

including samples of their corresponding data

collection instrument.


CORE INDICATOR LEVEL OF DATA COLLECTIONDATA COLLECTION

INSTRUMENT

1 Degree of integration of climate change in national, including sector, planning National level Scorecard 1

2 Evidence of strengthened government capacity and coordination mechanism to mainstream climate resilience National level Scorecard 2

3 Quality and extent to which climate responsive instruments/investment models are developed and tested (optional) Project level, aggregated at national level Scorecard 3

4Extent to which vulnerable households, communities, businesses, and public-sector services use improved PPCR-supported tools, instruments, strategies, and activities to respond to climate variability or climate change

Project level, aggregated at national level Table 4

5 Number of people supported by the PPCR to cope with the effects of climate change Project level, aggregated at national level Table 5

| 14 |


7 ST

EPS

OF A

NNUA

L PP

CR C

OUNT

RY R

EPOR

TING

CO

MP

OS

E T

HE

IN

-CO

UN

TR

Y

STA

KE

HO

LD

ER

G

RO

UP

S t

o

part

icip

ate

in

sco

rin

g w

ork

sho

p

CO

NV

EN

E

SC

OR

ING

W

OR

KS

HO

P

bet

wee

n

Jan

uar

y-J

un

e fo

r re

po

rtin

g

per

iod

Jan

uar

y 1

-Dec

emb

er 3

1 of

p

revi

ou

s ye

ar

SU

BS

EQ

UE

NT

Y

EA

RS

:

Pre

sen

t ev

iden

ce

base

to

sco

rin

g

wo

rksh

op

CO

ND

UC

T

QU

AL

ITY

A

SS

UR

AN

CE

SU

BM

IT

AN

NU

AL

C

OU

NT

RY

R

ES

ULT

S

RE

PO

RT

by

Ju

ne

30

12

46

7

YE

AR

1:

Est

ablis

h s

cori

ng

cr

iter

ia (

Co

re

Ind

icat

ors

1, 2

, 3

) an

d b

asel

ines

an

d t

arg

ets

(all

core

ind

icat

ors

)

3

PR

EP

AR

E

EV

IDE

NC

E

BA

SE

to

su

pp

ort

an

nu

al s

cori

ng

SU

BS

EQ

UE

NT

Y

EA

RS

:

Ass

ess

pro

gre

ss

5A

NN

UA

L S

CO

RIN

G W

OR

KS

HO

P

Ind

icat

ors

1 a

nd

2:

Ap

ply

evi

den

ce a

nd

est

ablis

hed

sc

ori

ng

cri

teri

a to

det

erm

ine

sco

res

by c

on

sen

sus

Ind

icat

ors

3, 4

, 5: D

iscu

ss a

nd

ve

rify

ag

gre

gat

ed p

roje

ct-l

evel

d

ata

Ind

icat

ors

1 a

nd

2 (

nat

ion

al le

vel)

: A

ssem

ble

rel

evan

t p

rog

ress

dat

a fr

om

last

12

mo

nth

s

Ind

icat

ors

3, 4

, 5 (

pro

ject

leve

l):

Co

llect

an

d a

gg

reg

ate

sco

reca

rd

and

tab

le d

ata

fro

m a

ll p

roje

cts

un

der

imp

lem

enta

tio

n

2. PROCESS PPCR COUNTRY REPORTING

| 15 |

– Private sector

– Civil society (e.g., non-governmental

organizations, traditional authorities/

indigenous groups, academic and research

institutions)

Ú Representatives of each stakeholder group

should be knowledgeable about climate

resilience programs in the nation and

include both women and men. Countries

are encouraged to invite stakeholders from

as many varieties of civil society groups as

possible. In some cases, representatives from

the relevant MDBs may also attend.

Step 2: Convene a scoring workshop

Ú The PPCR country focal point then invites the

stakeholders defined in Step 1 to a scoring

workshop to assess SPCR progress on the

five core indicators. It is held during the first

semester of the year (between January and

June) to ensure consistency with the PPCR

annual reporting cycle.

Ú The reporting period to be discussed during

the scoring workshop is from January

1 to December 31 of the previous year.

For example, if a country holds a scoring

workshop in May 2018, the participants

discuss all PPCR and national activities that

took place from January 1, 2017 through

December 31, 2017.

Step 3: First-year workshop: Establish scoring foundation

Ú Establish scoring criteria for Indicators 1, 2,

and 3

– Before starting the scoring process,

the PPCR country focal point invites

participants to establish scoring criteria

STEP BY STEP The PPCR country reporting process can be

broken down into seven distinct steps. Every

PPCR country manages these steps in its own

manner, calling on the CIF Administrative

Unit and MDBs for support as needed to build

capacity and ensure inclusivity.

The defining feature of the country reporting

process is the annual PPCR scoring workshop,

which brings together a wide spectrum of

stakeholders once per year to assess SPCR

progress against the five core indicators. In

addition to validating results reporting data,

the workshop adds value through a number of

additional benefits, including:

– Providing a practical and viable platform to

strengthen multi-sectoral cooperation and

collaboration

– Building awareness and creating synergies

among government and other actors on

climate change

– Building capacity in climate resilience and in

monitoring and evaluation, more broadly

– Promoting learning, information sharing,

government decision making, and knowledge

generation

– Providing a specific mechanism for

accountability

Step 1: Compose in-country stakeholder group

Ú Every year, the PPCR country focal point

identifies at least two representatives from

these PPCR stakeholder groups to participate

in the annual scoring exercise:

– National government (e.g., national climate

change agency, priority sector ministries)

| 16 |


(from 0 to 10) for each sub-question on the

three scorecards used to assess Indicators

1, 2, and 3. These indicators are qualitative

in nature, so defining clear scoring criteria

makes the subjective assessment more

objective, reliable, and consistent.

– This step is only undertaken once for each

indicator, typically at the beginning of the

first year’s scoring workshop. The scoring

criteria remain constant throughout the life

of the SPCR, so they must be developed

carefully with a longitudinal perspective in

mind (i.e., a consistent set of criteria used

to measure the same sub-questions from

one year to the next).

– The PPCR M&R system is designed to

allow flexibility in scoring criteria from

country to country. Scoring criteria often

reflect the development process that a

country expects to undertake to reach its

target outcome(s). In this sense, criteria 0

to 10 might reflect the 10 major milestones

that the country expects to meet toward

the end-line outcome. Scoring criteria take

into consideration the unique institutional

and policy ecosystem of each country. This

means that a score of 7 for one country will

not carry the same meaning as a score of 7

for another country. See Annexes 2 to 4 for

examples of scoring criteria for Indicators

1, 2, and 3.

Ú Establish baselines and targets for five core

indicators

– Once scoring criteria are set, the PPCR

country focal point leads the group in

establishing baselines and expected results

(or targets) for the five core indicators,

considering the following:

1. Baseline data for the scoring criteria only

need to be identified for Indicators 1 and

2, reflecting the national institutional and

policy conditions on climate change at the

time of the SPCR endorsement date. This

date is typically two to three years prior

to the first year of the scoring workshop,

so participants set these baselines

retrospectively using historical evidence

provided by the country focal point. All

additional developments in these areas

should be calibrated to the country’s

scoring criteria (0-10) per indicator.

2. The baselines for Indicators 3 ,4, and 5

are set to zero (0) without the need for a

baseline level of evidence. This is because

these indicators measure new activity as a

result of PPCR-funded interventions.

3. Expected results for Indicators 1, 2, and 3

are implicitly set at 10 (complete), which

corresponds to the (10) segment of the

scoring criteria.

4. Expected results are tabulated for

Indicators 4 and 5 by aggregating

the project-level expected results

corresponding to these indicators for each

PPCR project under implementation in

the country. As new PPCR projects begin

implementation, expected results for

Indicators 4 and 5 must be recalculated.

They will increase as this occurs.

5. A country’s SPCR is designed to work

toward continuous improvement.

Therefore, the expected results date is

the completion date of the SPCR, (i.e., the

date when all PPCR projects/programs

are completed). The end date may change

if future projects/programs are approved

with additional expected results.

2. PROCESS PPCR COUNTRY REPORTING

| 17 |

Step 4: Subsequent-years workshops: Prepare and present the evidence base

Ú Before scoring exercises begin, the PPCR

country focal point presents workshop

participants with a body of evidence that they

can use to assess progress and inform their

scoring decisions. This evidence base consists

of information and data detailing SPCR

performance during the reporting period.

The PPCR country focal point gathers this

information and data prior to the workshop

using the appropriate methods for each core

indicator:

– For Indicators 1 and 2, which relate to

national-level institutional and policy

conditions on climate change, the PPCR

country focal point assembles relevant

information and achievements from the

past 12 months, such as policy briefs,

government status reports, planning

documents, or other related evidence.

– For Indicators 3, 4, and 5, which relate to

project-level activities, the PPCR country

focal point engages project managers to

complete the corresponding scorecards

and tables for every PPCR project under

implementation. He/She then collects and

aggregates these scores and quantitative

data into national-level Scorecard 3 and

Tables 4 and 5.

Ú Once completed, the PPCR country focal

point stores all evidence base materials for

future reference. See Section 3 of this toolkit

for detailed descriptions of the types of

evidence that best support reporting on each

core indicator.

Step 5: Subsequent-years workshops: Assess progress

Ú Determine scores for Indicators 1 and 2 by

consensus

– To promote scoring uniformity, the

PPCR country focal point presents the

scoring criteria for each scorecard’s

sub-questions to the scoring workshop

participants. Based on the scoring criteria,

the presented evidence base, and personal

knowledge, each participant individually

scores the sub-questions in Scorecards 1

and 2 (corresponding to Indicators 1 and 2,

respectively).

– The scoring group then comes together

to present and discuss the individual

scores assigned. Through this deliberative

process, the scoring group negotiates a

singular score for each sub-question on

each scorecard, including an evidence-

based justification with narrative

description. The end product is one

scorecard per indicator that represents,

by consensus, the responses of all those

collaborating in the process.

TAKE NOTE:

Each time a PPCR project begins implementation, expected results for Core Indicators 4 and 5 must be recalculated.

| 18 |


– The focal point further polishes the

scorecards for submission to the CIF

Administrative Unit by adding supporting

narrative descriptions of each sub-questions’

score, based on workshop discussion and

minutes. See Annexes 5 and 6 for examples

of completed Scorecards 1 and 2.

Ú Verify aggregated project-level data for

Indicators 3, 4, and 5

– The PPCR country focal point presents the

aggregated project-level data as part of the

evidence base needed to inform the overall

scoring. Participants discuss and provide

feedback on the aggregated data to finalize

Scorecard 3 and Tables 4 and 5.

Step 6: Quality assurance

Ú The PPCR country focal point is encouraged,

in collaboration with the lead MDB, to invite

a wider group of stakeholders to review the

country results report, including the scores

on the PPCR scorecards, before sharing the

results with the CIF Administrative Unit.

Ú Based on national context, each country

determines how to conduct this review.

Generally, it tends to be less technical, more

high level to raise awareness of PPCR in-

country activities. Some countries may choose

to do this review as part of an annual, multi-

stakeholder, national-level steering committee

meeting on SPCR implementation.

Ú Given that the scoring process is itself a multi-

stakeholder platform with a built-in quality

assurance mechanism, this second level of

quality assurance is not required.

Step 7: Submit results report to the CIF Administrative Unit3

Ú The PPCR country focal point submits the

annual country results report to the CIF

Administrative Unit by no later than June

30 of each year. This includes all national-

level scorecards and tables for the five core

indicators and a summary of the annual

scoring workshop, describing participation,

scoring criteria and processes, and quality

assurance measures (see Annex 8).

Ú The CIF Administrative Unit collects and

aggregates country reporting from all PPCR

countries, as well as MDB reporting, to

produce a synthesis PPCR annual operations

and results report that it submits to the PPCR

Sub-Committee for approval during its fall

meeting every year.

The rigor of the country reporting process

depends largely on the strength, coherence, and

robustness of each country’s scoring criteria,

followed by the ability of the annual scoring

workshop participants to clearly identify

evidence that illustrates achievement across

the five core indicators. The numerical scores

reported are only analytically meaningful insofar

as they are supported by direct evidence using

both quantitative and qualitative information. ¢

3 The CIF Administrative Unit is developing an online reporting system, the CIF Collaboration Hub (CCH). This toolkit will be updated with new guidance once the CCH is operational.

“The information collected during scoring workshops has assisted us in identifying gaps in the climate change portfolio and in making decisions about how these will be addressed.”Claire Bernard, PPCR Country Focal Point Jamaica

| 19 |

ANNUAL PPCR SCORING WORKSHOP IN SAINT LUCIA

Following the basic steps of the

PPCR country reporting process,

Saint Lucia conducted national-

level M&R for the 2015 reporting

year in the following manner:

Compose in-country stakeholder groups: The

National Climate Change

Coordinating Committee

(NCCC) undertakes Saint

Lucia’s annual PPCR scoring

workshop. It comprises all

government ministries, the

National Insurance Council

of Saint Lucia, Saint Lucia

Bankers Association, National

Conservation Authority, Saint

Lucia Electricity Services

Limited, Saint Lucia Solid

Waste Management Authority,

Saint Lucia Air and Sea Ports

Authority, and the Water &

“There is an element of learning during the validation process… This sharing facilitates ongoing synergy building and collaboration among the various climate change adaptation and resilience-building players.”Susanna Scott, PPCR/DVRP Climate Change Coordinator, Saint Lucia

Sewerage Company. Other

agencies, groups, or individuals

are brought in as necessary.

Prepare evidence base: To

prepare for the scoring workshop

to assess progress made during

the 2015 reporting year, the PPCR

country focal point of Saint Lucia

held 11 meetings over the course

of a month in early 2016 with 33

participants from various agencies

to undertake scoring in their

respective areas. Using scoring

criteria established in the first

PPCR scoring workshop in 2014,

they discussed achievements in

2015 and whether changes in the

previous year’s scores for Indicators

1, 2, and 3 were warranted. She

then collated the information

generated by these meetings and

drafted an evaluation report.

Convene workshop and present evidence base: The PPCR

country focal point called the

annual PPCR scoring workshop

in March 2016 and presented the

evaluation report to attendees

from the NCCC for discussion,

verification, and finalization.

Assess progress: After a brief

refresher on the PPCR M&R

process, plenary discussions

were held to verify and finalize

scores for the various indicators.

Based on comments received

during the scoring exercise,

the PPCR country focal point

prepared the final country

results report and submitted

it to the CIF Administrative

Unit. The final report was then

distributed to the NCCC and

other stakeholder groups.

PPCR M&R IN ACTION:

© CIF

| 20 |


1

In 2016, the CIF and MDB partners conducted PPCR M&R regional trainings in Jamaica for Caribbean countries and Tonga for Pacific countries.

©Emmanuel Kouadio/CIF

| 21 |

This section contains detailed information about collecting and reporting data on the five core indicators

of PPCR, including the rationale and methodology supporting each. It provides technical definitions and

specification on data collection sources and reporting tools, including samples of blank scorecards and

tables that relate to each core indicator. The Annex contains additional examples of country-completed

scoring criteria and scorecards.

3.TOOLS REPORTING AND TECHNICAL GUIDANCE


1 Degree of integration of climate change in national, including sector, planning

2 Evidence of strengthened government capacity and coordination mechanism to mainstream climate resilience

3 Quality and extent to which climate responsive instruments/investment models are developed and tested (optional)

4 Extent to which vulnerable households, communities, businesses, and public-sector services use improved PPCR-supported tools, instruments, strategies, and activities to respond to climate variability or climate change

5 Number of people supported by PPCR to cope with the effects of climate change

| 22 |


1 PPCR CORE INDICATOR 1 Degree of integration of climate change in national, including sector, planning

RATIONALE

This indicator is designed to capture the extent to which considerations of climate

resilience (risks, opportunities) are integrated into planning processes at national and

sectoral levels. It is relevant to interventions intended to build country capacity to

address climate resilience through the development of climate plans, strategies, and

mainstreaming mechanisms and systems.

The achievement of this indicator cannot be attributed to PPCR alone. This indicator

provides reference data about the strength of a country’s climate-responsive

development planning.

METHODOLOGY

Measurement of Core Indicator 1 is at the national level by way of PPCR Scorecard 1.

This indicator is a qualitative assessment of the various strategies, policies, plans, and

documents that demonstrate observed changes in the integration of climate change

priorities into national, including sector, planning.

Defining clear scoring criteria for each sub-question in the scorecard makes the

subjective assessment of Core Indicator 1 more objective, reliable, and consistent.

The first annual scoring workshop establishes scoring criteria (0 to 10) that track with

the transformation the country seeks to achieve with PPCR support. This includes setting

baseline and target scores that reflect the evidenced national institutional and policy

conditions on climate change at the time of the SPCR endorsement date (baseline 0) and

expected conditions at the SPCR completion date (target 10).

Subsequent scoring workshops assess progress using these scoring criteria, which remain

constant throughout the life of the SPCR.

>>

3. TOOLS REPORTING AND TECHNICAL GUIDANCE

| 23 |

1

>>

METHODOLOGY (continued)

The following scorecard sub-questions are utilized for the assessment. These sub-

questions are regarded as complementary, but not strictly sequential. Each should be

assessed annually using the specific scoring criteria established for it during Year 1:

a) List of sectors identified as priorities in the SPCR and other priority sectors for

integrating climate change into planning3

b) Is there an approved climate change plan for the nation/sector?

c) Have climate resilience strategies been embedded in the central government’s/

sector’s principal planning documents?

d) Has responsibility been assigned to institutions or persons to integrate climate

resilience planning?

e) Have specific measures to address climate resilience been identified and

prioritized (e.g., laws, regulations, and incentives in these policies, plans,

investments, and/or programs)?

f) Do all planning processes routinely screen for climate risks?

In addition, the following open-ended, narrative sub-questions also require response. They

do not require specific scoring criteria:

Gender mainstreaming: To what extent and in what ways have gender and

socioeconomic vulnerability concerns been mainstreamed with the climate resilience

planning processes at national and sector levels (e.g., through budgeting approaches,

gender needs assessments and consultations, or similar, including coordination with the

Ministry of Women’s Affairs or other women’s organizations)?

Lessons learned: What have been the key successes when integrating climate change

into national, including sector, planning? What have been the key challenges and what

opportunities for improvement do you see?

Sharing experiences: Please provide some insights into your country’s experiences

integrating climate change into national, including sector, planning.

>>

4 This indicator first calls for national-level reporting on the sub-questions. Subsequently, each priority sector listed is also assessed according to the same sub-questions.

| 24 |


1 TECHNICAL DEFINITIONS

Degree refers to the depth of the process of integration of climate resilience within

national, ministry, and sector planning.

Integration refers to embedding climate resilience priorities into new and existing

development planning.

National, including sector, planning refers to the processes for developing strategies,

policies, plans, laws, regulations, and institutional arrangements to promote and integrate

climate resilience.

Routine screening for climate risks in planning refers to the process of identifying and

prioritizing hazards, current vulnerabilities, and risks from projected climate changes, as

well as identifying options to increase resilience. This definition equally applies to more

strategic planning (e.g., elaboration of a national or sector adaptation program) and

physical or infrastructure planning (e.g., construction of bridges or roads).

Approval of a climate change plan is determined per country but may refer to ratification

at the parliamentary or executive level.

DATA SOURCES AND COLLECTION

Background data is sourced from official policy planning documents to establish a baseline and subsequent monitoring of the extent to which climate change is integrated into national, including sector, planning. In addition, baseline information may be drawn from national repositories, including meeting documents, workshop and budget reports, policy papers, and other relevant reports available from the civil society and PPCR stakeholder community.

This information helps scoring workshop participants to calibrate and justify the appropriate responses to the qualitative Scorecard 1. The PPCR country focal point stores all relevant information that informs the self-assessment (i.e., the evidence base) for future reference.

REPORTING TOOLS

An example of scoring criteria for Core Indicator 1 is available in Annex 2. This example can be customized based on individual country contexts and development objectives.

The blank template for Scorecard 1 follows herein. This reporting tool is available to all countries and is maintained from year to year to track the evolution of scores as the SPCR progresses.

An example of Scorecard 1 completed by a PPCR pilot country is available in Annex 5.

>>


| 25 |

1

PPCR SCORECARD 1

| 26 |


1

INSTRUCTIONS: 1. Please establish scoring criteria for each aspect of this scorecard and submit them with your report. This should be done once, preferably at baseline stage, and used during subsequent reporting years. 2. If you have previously established your scoring criteria, use them and submit them with your report. 3. Score each cell with a score between 0 and 10 (refer to your scoring criteria defined for this scorecard). 4. Provide explanation of change in scores between Yn-1 and Yn in appropriate cells and avoid abbreviations.

GENDER MAINSTREAMINGTo what extent and in what ways have gender and socioeconomic vulnerability concerns been mainstreamed with the climate resilience planning processes at national and sector levels? (e.g., through gender budgeting approaches, gender needs assessments and consultations, or similar, including coordination with the Ministry of Women’s Affairs, women’s organizations)

PPCR SCORECARD 1 DATE OF REPORT: MM/DD/YY

PPCR CORE INDICATOR 1: DEGREE OF INTEGRATION OF CLIMATE CHANGE INTO NATIONAL PLANNINGDATA COLLECTION METHOD: DATA SCORED AT THE COUNTRY LEVEL

SAMPLE SPCR

REPORTING PERIOD: From: To:

Complete below the sectors identified as a priority in the SPCR. Insert other priority sectors or ministries below(optional)

Is there an approved climate change plan for the nation/sector?

Have climate resilience strategies been embedded in the central government’s/sector’s principal planning documents?

Has responsibility been assigned to institutions or persons to integrate climate resilience planning?

Have specific measures to address climate resilience been identified and prioritized (e.g., investments and programs)?

Do all planning processes routinely screen for climate risks?

A B C D E F

SCORE-YN-1 REPORTING PERIOD (LAST YEAR)

SCORE-YN REPORTING PERIOD (NEW)









NATIONAL PLANNING How do you justify the increase (or decrease) in scores between scores repored last year (Yn-1) and scores repored this year (Yn)? Please explain.

PRIORITY SECTOR #1

How do you justify the increase (or decrease) in scores between scores repored last year (Yn-1) and scores repored this year (Yn)? Please explain.

PRIORITY SECTOR #2


PRIORITY SECTOR #3 How do you justify the increase (or decrease) in scores between scores repored last year (Yn-1) and scores repored this year (Yn)? Please explain.

PRIORITY SECTOR #... How do you justify the increase (or decrease) in scores between scores reported last year (Yn-1) and scores reported this year (Yn)? Please explain.


| 27 |

1

LESSONS LEARNEDWhat have been the key successes when integrating climate change in national, including sector, planning during the last calendar year?

What have been the key challenges and what opportunities for improvement do you see?

SHARING EXPERIENCESPlease let us have some insights into the particular experience of your country with integrating climate change in national, including sector, planning.


PPCR CORE INDICATOR 1: DEGREE OF INTEGRATION OF CLIMATE CHANGE INTO NATIONAL PLANNINGDATA COLLECTION METHOD: DATA SCORED AT THE COUNTRY LEVEL

SAMPLE SPCR


Complete below the sectors identified as a priority in the SPCR. Insert other priority sectors or ministries below(optional)

Is there an approved climate change plan for the nation/sector?

Have climate resilience strategies been embedded in the central government’s/sector’s principal planning documents?

Has responsibility been assigned to institutions or persons to integrate climate resilience planning?

Have specific measures to address climate resilience been identified and prioritized (e.g., investments and programs)?

Do all planning processes routinely screen for climate risks?

A B C D E F











NATIONAL PLANNING How do you justify the increase (or decrease) in scores between scores repored last year (Yn-1) and scores repored this year (Yn)? Please explain.

PRIORITY SECTOR #1


PRIORITY SECTOR #2



PRIORITY SECTOR #... How do you justify the increase (or decrease) in scores between scores reported last year (Yn-1) and scores reported this year (Yn)? Please explain.

| 28 |


2 PPCR CORE INDICATOR 2 Evidence of strengthened government capacity and coordination mechanism to mainstream climate resilience

RATIONALE

This outcome indicator is important to demonstrate that PPCR’s support to pilot

country governments results in improved institutions and institutional frameworks for

mainstreaming climate resilience.

This indicator aims to assess whether PPCR is strengthening government capacity and a

coordination mechanism for mainstreaming climate resilience.

METHODOLOGY

Measurement for Core Indicator 2 is at the national level and by way of the PPCR

Scorecard 2. The indicator calls for the measurement of two distinct components:

1. Strengthened government capacity to mainstream climate resilience

2. Strengthened coordination mechanism to mainstream climate resilience

Core Indicator 2 is qualitative in nature. Defining clear scoring criteria for each sub-

question in the scorecard makes the subjective assessment more objective, reliable, and

consistent.

The first annual scoring workshop establishes scoring criteria (0 to 10) that track with

the transformation the country seeks to achieve with PPCR support. This includes setting

baseline and target scores that reflect the evidenced national institutional and policy

conditions on climate change at the time of the SPCR endorsement date (baseline 0) and

expected conditions at the SPCR completion date (target 10).

Subsequent scoring workshops assess progress using these scoring criteria, which remain

constant throughout the life of the SPCR.

Core Indicator 2 utilizes the following scorecard sub-questions to measure strengthened

government capacity:

a) List of priority sectors identified in the SPCR and other priority sectors for

mainstreaming climate resilience

b) Are information, studies, and assessments addressing climate change,

variability, and resilience available?

c) Is the necessary climate change expertise available?

d) Do national/sector incentives and legislative policies expressly address climate

change and resilience?

e) Does the government/sector participate in the coordination mechanism?

>>


| 29 |

2METHODOLOGY (continued)

Core Indicator 2 utilizes the following sub-questions to measure the strengthened

coordination mechanism:

a) Is the coordination mechanism functional, e.g., established, effective, and

efficient?

b) Does it coordinate climate resilience interventions other than those funded by

PPCR?

c) Is there a broad set of non-governmental stakeholders involved?

d) Is the relevant climate resilience information in the public domain?

e) Are females and males participating equally?

Each sub-question is assessed annually using the specific scoring criteria established for

that sub-question during Year 1.

Reporting on Core Indicator 2 also includes the following open-ended, narrative sub-

questions, which do not require specific scoring criteria:

Gender considerations and coordination mechanism: Please elaborate on whether and

how gender good practices at the institutional level have been mainstreamed into the

coordination mechanism unit. (i.e., comment on the number of technical staff in the unit

by gender and whether any gender training/capacity building has been offered with PPCR

support to coordination unit staff and/or other government staff).

Lessons learned: What have been the key successes when strengthening the government

capacity and coordination mechanism? What have been the key challenges and what

opportunities for improvement do you see?

Sharing experiences: What are some insights into your country’s experiences in

strengthening government capacity and the coordination mechanism to mainstream

climate resilience?

>>

>>

| 30 |


2 TECHNICAL DEFINITIONS

Mainstreaming climate resilience is the process that ensures climate risks and climate

resilience are adequately and duly considered in national decision-making processes

and that these considerations are reflected in budgets, plans, policies, instruments,

regulations, and the like.

Government capacity to mainstream climate resilience refers to levels of institutional

knowledge pertaining to climate risks and climate resilience in the priority sectors

identified in the SPCR, and to political will, as evidenced by, for example, national policies,

incentives, and legislative undertakings to mainstream climate resilience.

Coordination mechanism refers to the relevant committee or institutional arrangement

laid out in the SPCR to develop and oversee the achievement of PPCR program goals in

the country.

Institutional knowledge refers to the knowledge base and expertise on climate risk

and resilience in relevant ministries and national agencies. This includes both physical

repositories of knowledge in the form of reports and databases, as well as technical

know-how among staff members.


To establish a baseline and subsequent monitoring of strengthened government capacity,

background data is sourced from national repositories, including meeting documents,

workshop and budget reports, policy papers, and other relevant reports available from

the civil society and PPCR stakeholder community.

This information helps scoring workshop participants to calibrate and justify the

appropriate responses to the qualitative Scorecard 2. The PPCR country focal point

stores all relevant documentation that informs the self-assessment (i.e., the evidence

base) for future reference.

REPORTING TOOLS

An example of scoring criteria for Core Indicator 2, adapted from a pilot country, is

available in Annex 3. This example can be customized by pilot countries based on country

contexts and development objectives.

The blank template for PPCR Scorecard 2 follows. This reporting tool is available to

all countries and is maintained from year to year to track the evolution of scores as the

SPCR progresses.

An example of Scorecard 2 completed by a PPCR pilot country is available in Annex 6.

>>


| 31 |

1

PPCR SCORECARD 2

| 32 |


INSTRUCTIONS: 1. Please establish scoring criteria for each aspect of this scorecard and submit them with your report. This should be done once, preferably at baseline stage, and used during subsequent reporting years. 2. If you have previously established your scoring criteria, use them and submit them with your report. 3. Score each cell with a score between 0 and 10 (refer to your scoring criteria defined for this scorecard). 4. Provide explanation of change in scores between Yn-1 and Yn in appropriate cells and avoid abbreviations.

GENDER CONSIDERATIONS AND COORDINATION MECHANISMPlease elaborate on whether and how gender good practice at the institutional level has been mainstreamed into the coordination mechanism unit. This should include commentary on the number of technical staff (women, men) in the unit and whether any gender training/capacity-building has been offered with PPCR support to staff in the coordination unit (women, men) or other government staff working on climate change.


PPCR CORE INDICATOR 2: EVIDENCE OF STRENGTHENED GOVERNMENT CAPACITY AND COORDINATION MECHANISM TO MAINSTREAM CLIMATE RESILIENCEDATA COLLECTION METHOD: DATA SCORED AT THE COUNTRY LEVEL

SAMPLE SPCR


GOVERNMENT CAPACITY Complete below the sectors identified as a priority in the SPCR. Insert other priority sectors or ministries below (optional).

Are information, studies, and assessments addressing climate change, variability, and resilience available?

Is the necessary climate change expertise available?

Do national/sector incentives and legislative policies expressly address climate change and resilience?

Does the government/sector participate in the coordination mechanism?

A B C D E









SAMPLE COUNTRY GOVERNMENT How do you justify the increase (or decrease) in scores between scores repored last year (Yn-1) and scores repored this year (Yn)? Please explain.

PRIORITY SECTOR #1


PRIORITY SECTOR #2

How do you justify increase (or decrease) in scores between scores repored last year (Yn-1) and scores repored this year (Yn)? Briefly describe with evidence.


PRIORITY SECTOR #... How do you justify the increase (or decrease) in scores between scores repored last year (Yn-1) and scores repored this year (Yn)? Please explain.

Is the coordination mechanism functional (e.g., established, effective, and efficient)?

Does it coordinate climate resilience interventions other than those funded by PPCR?

Is there a broad set of non-governmental stakeholders involved?

Is the relevant climate resilience information in the public domain?

Are females and males participating equally?

COORDINATION MECHANISM Name the coordination mechanism below

SCORE REPORTED LAST YEAR

(YN-1)

SCORE IN YN (NEW)


(YN-1)

SCORE IN YN (NEW)

SCORE REPORTED LAST YEAR (YN-1)

SCORE IN YN (NEW)


SCORE IN YN (NEW)


SCORE IN YN (NEW)


2


| 33 |

LESSONS LEARNEDWhat have been the key successes when strengthening the governement capacity and the coordination mechanism?


SHARING EXPERIENCESPlease let us have some insights into the particular experience of your country with strengthening the governement capacity and the coordination mechanism to mainstream climate resilience.

2PPCR SCORECARD 2 DATE OF REPORT: MM/DD/YY

PPCR CORE INDICATOR 2: EVIDENCE OF STRENGTHENED GOVERNMENT CAPACITY AND COORDINATION MECHANISM TO MAINSTREAM CLIMATE RESILIENCEDATA COLLECTION METHOD: DATA SCORED AT THE COUNTRY LEVEL

SAMPLE SPCR


GOVERNMENT CAPACITY Complete below the sectors identified as a priority in the SPCR. Insert other priority sectors or ministries below (optional).

Are information, studies, and assessments addressing climate change, variability, and resilience available?

Is the necessary climate change expertise available?

Do national/sector incentives and legislative policies expressly address climate change and resilience?

Does the government/sector participate in the coordination mechanism?

A B C D E









SAMPLE COUNTRY GOVERNMENT How do you justify the increase (or decrease) in scores between scores repored last year (Yn-1) and scores repored this year (Yn)? Please explain.

PRIORITY SECTOR #1


PRIORITY SECTOR #2

How do you justify increase (or decrease) in scores between scores repored last year (Yn-1) and scores repored this year (Yn)? Briefly describe with evidence.


PRIORITY SECTOR #... How do you justify the increase (or decrease) in scores between scores repored last year (Yn-1) and scores repored this year (Yn)? Please explain.

Is the coordination mechanism functional (e.g., established, effective, and efficient)?

Does it coordinate climate resilience interventions other than those funded by PPCR?

Is there a broad set of non-governmental stakeholders involved?

Is the relevant climate resilience information in the public domain?

Are females and males participating equally?

COORDINATION MECHANISM Name the coordination mechanism below


(YN-1)

SCORE IN YN (NEW)


(YN-1)

SCORE IN YN (NEW)


SCORE IN YN (NEW)


SCORE IN YN (NEW)


SCORE IN YN (NEW)


| 34 |


3 PPCR CORE INDICATOR 3 Quality and extent to which climate responsive instruments/investment models are developed and tested (optional)

RATIONALE

This optional indicator seeks to estimate the extent to which PPCR identifies and

implements climate-responsive investment approaches. The estimation is based on

documenting the instruments and models that have been developed and tested with PPCR

support and assessing their quality.

This indicator complements Core Indicator 4, “Extent to which vulnerable households,

communities, businesses, and public sector services use improved PPCR-supported tools,

instruments, strategies, and activities to respond to climate variability or climate change.”

Core Indicator 3 focuses on which instruments and investment models have been developed

and tested and rates them based on their quality, climate responsiveness, development, and

testing. Core Indicator 4 focuses on the extent to which they are being used by different

vulnerable stakeholders.

The assumption underlying both indicators is that if vulnerable stakeholders use high-quality

climate responsive tools to a greater extent, this will strengthen their adaptive capacities.

Core Indicator 3 was deemed optional based on consensus at the April 2017 multi-

stakeholder validation workshop as part of the PPCR M&R Stocktaking Review. Some

countries reported that it is a useful component to measure resilience, whereas the CIF

Administrative Unit and other countries reported not being able to make systematic use of

the data reported through this indicator.

Each PPCR country must determine whether they want to include Core Indicator 3 within

their national PPCR M&R processes.

METHODOLOGY

All projects/programs are invited, but not required, to monitor and report on Core

Indicator 3 using PPCR Scorecard 3. This indicator is qualitative in nature, so defining

clear scoring criteria for each sub-question in the scorecard makes the subjective

assessment more objective, reliable, and consistent.

The first annual scoring workshop establishes scoring criteria, as well as baseline and

target scores, that track with the transformation the country seeks to achieve with PPCR

support. Core Indicator 3 measures new activity as a result of PPCR-funded interventions,

so the baseline is set to 0 without the need for a baseline level of evidence and the target

is set to 10 to correspond with scoring criteria 10.

In subsequent years, each project/program completes annually a scorecard using these

scoring criteria, which remain constant throughout the life of the SPCR. The PPCR

country focal point then compiles all project-level response data into one Scorecard 3 at

the national/SPCR level, which the annual scoring workshop validates.

>>


| 35 |

3

>>

>>METHODOLOGY (continued)

For each project/program, the following initial scorecard sub-questions are included in the

scorecard to facilitate reporting:

a) List of relevant project titles

b) Which climate-responsive instruments/investment models have been

developed and tested? Note that this is the same list of tools, instruments,

strategies, or activities being reported under Core Indicator 4.

For each instrument/investment model, Core Indicator 3 utilizes the following sub-

questions for assessment:

c) Has the instrument/investment model been developed and tested?

d) Has the instrument/investment model been implemented to the scale proposed?

e) Has the instrument/investment model appropriately incorporated the needs of

both female and male users into its design and implementation?

f) Has the instrument/investment model incorporated the needs of vulnerable

populations into its design and implementation?

Questions c through f are answered by assigning the instruments/investment models scores

from 0-10, where 0 = no, 5 =halfway and 10 = yes (completely), according to the scoring

criteria established at baseline.

Reporting on Core Indicator 3 also includes the following open-ended, narrative question:

Lessons learned: What have been the key successes in developing and testing these

instruments/investment models? What have been the key challenges, and what opportunities

for improvement do you see?

Where possible, project/program teams are also encouraged to report whether instruments/

investment models have been further developed and tested by other non-PPCR stakeholders.

TECHNICAL DEFINITIONS

A climate-responsive instrument or investment model is one that incorporates climate

variability and climate change considerations, or one that can be applied to enhance the

climate resilience of people, products, systems, or services. Examples include the following:

• Technologies or infrastructure investments, such as improvements to buildings,

agricultural, coastal, hydro-meteorological, transport, water, drainage, ICT, and

energy systems

• Data, analytical work, technical studies, and knowledge assets, such as climate

scenarios, forecasts, vulnerability assessments, climate risk/impact analyses,

maps, needs assessments, and guidelines/manuals)

| 36 |


3 TECHNICAL DEFINITIONS (continued)

• Public awareness platforms, such as information dissemination platforms,

weather information services, media campaigns, knowledge-sharing events,

stakeholder networks, websites, and e-learning platforms

• Financial instruments, such as micro/insurance, micro/finance, small grants, and

loan facilities

• Public/community services, such as services providing water, sanitation,

transport, flood protection, irrigation, early warning, social protection, education,

and health

Climate-responsive instruments/investment models are considered PPCR-supported

if they were developed and tested within the scope of activities carried out during the

programming or implementation of a country’s or region’s SPCR, regardless of the

funding source.

For this indicator, an instrument or model is defined as developed if it has been designed

from scratch, adapted, or modified to meet the appropriate need.


When scoring this indicator, all efforts are made to use data sourced from existing

project/program or SPCR documentation and other relevant reports available from civil

society and the PPCR stakeholder community. The reporting entity uses this information

as evidence to gauge the appropriate strength of project responses to the qualitative

scorecard.

The respective project/program coordinator and the PPCR country focal point store all

relevant information that informs reporting (i.e., the evidence base) for future reference.

REPORTING TOOLS

An example of scoring criteria for Core Indicator 3, adapted from a pilot country, is

available in Annex 4. This example can be customized by pilot countries based on country

contexts and development objectives.

The blank template for PPCR Scorecard 3 follows. This reporting tool is available to

all countries and is maintained from year to year to track the evolution of scores as the

SPCR progresses.

An example of Scorecard 3 completed by a PPCR pilot country is in Annex 7.

>>

3


| 37 |

1

PPCR SCORECARD 3

| 38 |


INSTRUCTIONS: 1. List all climate responsive instruments/investment models identified in each of your project before starting (refer to projects documents). 2. Establish scoring criteria for each of the aspects of this scorecard and submit them with your report. This should be done once, preferably at baseline stage, and used during subsequent reporting years. 3. If you have previously established your scoring criteria, use them and submit them with your report. 4. Score each cell with a score between 0 and 10 (refer to your scoring criteria defined for this scorecard). 5. Add more lines under each project if needed.


PPCR CORE INDICATOR 3: QUALITY OF AND EXTENT TO WHICH CLIMATE RESPONSIVE INSTRUMENTS/ INVESTMENT MODELS ARE DEVELOPED AND TESTEDDATA COLLECTION METHOD: SCORED AT THE PROJECT-LEVEL AND COMPILED AT THE SPCR LEVEL

SPCR

COUNTRY AGGREGATE REPORT


PROJECT TITLE Climate responsive instrument/investment models identified:

Has the instrument/ investment model been developed and tested?

Has the instrument/ investment model been implemented to the scale proposed?

Has the instrument/investment model appropriately incorporated the needs of both females and males into its design and implementation?

Has the instrument/ investment model incorporated the needs of vulnerable populations into its design and implementation?

A # B C D E F

PROJECT # 1

1

Briefly comment on each score

2


3


4


PROJECT # ...

1


2


3


4


3


| 39 |

3

LESSONS LEARNEDWhat have been the key successes when developing and testing these instruments/investment models?



PPCR CORE INDICATOR 3: QUALITY OF AND EXTENT TO WHICH CLIMATE RESPONSIVE INSTRUMENTS/ INVESTMENT MODELS ARE DEVELOPED AND TESTEDDATA COLLECTION METHOD: SCORED AT THE PROJECT-LEVEL AND COMPILED AT THE SPCR LEVEL

SPCR



PROJECT TITLE Climate responsive instrument/investment models identified:

Has the instrument/ investment model been developed and tested?

Has the instrument/ investment model been implemented to the scale proposed?

Has the instrument/investment model appropriately incorporated the needs of both females and males into its design and implementation?

Has the instrument/ investment model incorporated the needs of vulnerable populations into its design and implementation?

A # B C D E F

PROJECT # 1

1


2


3


4


PROJECT # ...

1


2


3


4


| 40 |


PPCR CORE INDICATOR 4 Extent to which vulnerable households, communities, businesses, and public sector services use improved PPCR-supported tools, instruments, strategies, and activities to respond to climate variability or climate change

RATIONALE

This indicator measures the extent to which PPCR is strengthening the adaptive capacities

of targeted stakeholders in a country or region, based on their uptake of the climate-

responsive tools, instruments, strategies, and activities that PPCR supports.

This indicator complements Core Indicator 3, “Quality and extent to which climate

responsive instruments/investment models are developed and tested.” Core Indicator 3

focuses on which instruments and investment models have been developed and tested and

rates them based on their quality, climate responsiveness, development, and testing. Core

Indicator 4 focuses on the extent to which these tools, instruments, strategies, and activities

are being used by different vulnerable stakeholders.

The assumption underlying both indicators is that if vulnerable stakeholders use

high-quality, climate-responsive tools to a greater extent, this will strengthen their

adaptive capacities.

METHODOLOGY

Core Indicator 4 is reported both qualitatively and quantitatively. All projects/programs

under implementation monitor and report on it annually using the reporting instrument

PPCR Table 4. The PPCR country focal point then aggregates and synthesizes all

project-level response data into one Table 4 at the SPCR level, which the annual scoring

workshop validates.

In Year 1, the scoring workshop establishes baselines and targets for Core Indicator 4. It

measures new activity as a result of PPCR-funded interventions, so the baseline is set to 0

and the target is calculated by aggregating the project-level expected results. As new PPCR

projects begin implementation, expected results for Core Indicator 4 must be recalculated.

Measurement of Core Indicator 4 covers the following categories:

a) Tools, instruments, strategies, and activities developed for households

b) Tools, instruments, strategies, and activities developed for communities

c) Tools, instruments, strategies, and activities developed for public services

d) Tools, instruments, strategies, and activities developed for businesses

>>

4


| 41 |

4METHODOLOGY (continued)

For each of these categories, the following information is recorded in the table:

• Name of the tool, instrument, strategy, or activity (tool/etc.)

• Project title

• Number of communities, households, public services, or businesses reached

(cumulative since project started)

• Expected number of communities, households, public services, or businesses to be

reached (i.e., target)

• Description of how the tools/etc. have helped each entity increase their adaptive or

resilience capacity

• One example from the project for each of the tools/etc. identified (i.e., narrative

description)

Note that the climate responsive tools, instruments, strategies, and activities identified

in Table 4 are the same as reported under PPCR Core Indicator 3 (for those countries

reporting on it).

The unit that is counted in each case is 1 household, 1 business, 1 community, and 1 public

sector service.

When a targeted beneficiary uses an improved PPCR-supported tool more than once in a

reporting period, it is counted only once. When a beneficiary is the target of several PPCR-

supported tools, he/she is counted once for each tool he/she uses during the report period.


The targeted stakeholders, or users, are climate vulnerable households, communities, businesses,

and/or public sector services. Social vulnerability due to climate change is defined on a project/

program basis, reflecting the context in which each project/program is operating. Each project/

program identifies the targeted entities of a PPCR-supported tool/etc. (i.e., households, businesses,

etc.) and explains in their baseline documentation and subsequent reporting what makes them

vulnerable to the impacts of climate variability and climate change.

A targeted entity has used a tool, instrument, strategy, or activity when the entity has directly

benefitted from that tool/etc. on one or more occasions during the 12-month reporting period.

Beneficiaries in the context of the CIF are entities that have been reached or supported

by any activities financed or implemented through the CIF’s programs, projects, or sub-

projects. See Core Indicator 5 for more details on beneficiary definition.

Households, communities, businesses, and public sector services supported correspond

to discrete entities, populations, or other units identified within each project or program

design as having a clearly discernible relationship to the intervention in question and its

intended outputs, outcomes, and/or impacts.

>>

>>

| 42 |


TECHNICAL DEFINITIONS (continued)

• Household is defined using the national census definition.

• Community is defined as the smallest administrative subset targeted by the SPCR.

• Business is defined as those targeted by the project/program, formal or informal, where

the employees extend beyond a household. Otherwise, they are counted as households,

(e.g., a subsistence farmer is counted as a household).

• Public sector service is defined as a government-owned or government co-funded service

entity that provides services to the public. A public sector service entity is counted at the

lowest organized unit, (e.g., a district agricultural extension office is counted as one).

A climate-responsive tool, instrument, strategy, or activity is one that incorporates climate

variability and climate change considerations or can be applied to enhance the climate resilience

of people, products, or services. They include the following examples:

• Technologies or infrastructure investments, such as improvements to buildings, agricultural,

coastal, hydro-meteorological, transport, water, drainage, ICT, and energy systems

• Data, analytical work, technical studies, and knowledge assets, such as climate

scenarios, forecasts, vulnerability assessments, climate risk/impact analyses, maps, needs

assessments, guidelines/manuals

• Public awareness platforms, such as information dissemination platforms, media

campaigns, weather information, knowledge sharing events, stakeholder networks,

websites, educational curricula, market prices, and training

• Financial instruments, such as micro/insurance, micro/finance, small grants, loan facilities

• Public/community services, such as water and sanitation, transport, flood protection,

irrigation, early warning, social protection, education, health

A tool, instrument, strategy, or activity is considered PPCR-supported if it is developed, tested,

promoted, and/or used within the scope of activities carried out under the programming or

implementation of a country’s SPCR, regardless of the original funding source.

A tool/etc. is defined as developed if it has been designed from scratch, adapted, or modified to

meet the appropriate need.


All efforts are made to use data sourced from existing project/program or SPCR

documentation, supplemented by other relevant reports and documents from civil society

and the PPCR stakeholder community.

The respective project/program coordinator and the country focal point store all relevant

information that informs reporting (i.e., the evidence base) for future reference.

REPORTING TOOLS

The blank template for PPCR Table 4 follows. It is available to all countries and is

maintained from year to year to track the evolution of data as the SPCR progresses.

>>4


| 43 |

1

PPCR SCORECARD 4

| 44 |


INSTRUCTIONS: 1. Clearly identify the target population of your instruments/investment models/tools: Is it households, communities, businesses (private sector), public service entities, or a combination thereof (refer to the project documents)? 2. Actual results:Cumulatively report results achieved since the project started implementation. Expected results:Results expected to be achieved at completion of the project as stated in the project document

PPCR TABLE 4 DATE OF REPORT: MM/DD/YY

PPCR CORE INDICATOR 4: EXTENT TO WHICH VULNERABLE HOUSEHOLDS, COMMUNITIES, BUSINESSES AND PUBLIC SECTOR SERVICES USE IMPROVED PPCR SUPPORTED TOOLS, INSTRUMENTS, STRATEGIES, ACTIVITIES TO RESPOND TO CLIMATE VARIABILITY AND CLIMATE CHANGEDATA COLLECTION METHOD: DATA COLLECTED FOR EACH PROJECT AND COMPILED AT THE SPCR LEVEL

SAMPLE



A. TOOLS/INSTRUMENTS DEVELOPED FOR HOUSEHOLDS

# NAME OF THE TOOL/INVEST MODEL PROJECT TITLENUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS

Actual results (cumulative since project started) Expected results Please describe how the tools, instruments, strategies, and activities developed by the project have helped households increase their adaptive or resilience

capacity. Provide one example for each tools/instruments identified.

1

2

3

...

B. TOOLS/INSTRUMENTS DEVELOPED FOR COMMUNITIES

# NAME OF THE TOOL/INVEST MODEL PROJECT TITLENUMBER OF COMMUNITIES

Actual results (cumulative since project started) Expected results Please describe how the tools, instruments, strategies, and activities developed by the project have helped communities increase their adaptive or resilience


1

2

3

...

C. TOOLS/INSTRUMENTS DEVELOPED FOR PUBLIC SERVICES

# NAME OF THE TOOL/INVEST MODEL PROJECT TITLENUMBER OF PUBLIC SERVICES

Actual results (cumulative since project started) Expected results Please describe how the tools, instruments, strategies, and activities developed by the project have helped public services increase their adaptive or resilience


1

2

3

...

D. TOOLS/INSTRUMENTS DEVELOPED FOR BUSINESSES

# NAME OF THE TOOL/INVEST MODEL PROJECT TITLENUMBER OF BUSINESSES

Actual results (cumulative since project started) Expected results Please describe how the tools, instruments, strategies, and activities developed by the project have helped businesses increase their adaptive or resilience


1

2

3

...

4


| 45 |

4

3. Always provide written comments on how the target population identified in this table will use the instruments/investment models/tools to respond to climate change. 4. Add more lines under each project if needed.


PPCR CORE INDICATOR 4: EXTENT TO WHICH VULNERABLE HOUSEHOLDS, COMMUNITIES, BUSINESSES AND PUBLIC SECTOR SERVICES USE IMPROVED PPCR SUPPORTED TOOLS, INSTRUMENTS, STRATEGIES, ACTIVITIES TO RESPOND TO CLIMATE VARIABILITY AND CLIMATE CHANGEDATA COLLECTION METHOD: DATA COLLECTED FOR EACH PROJECT AND COMPILED AT THE SPCR LEVEL

SAMPLE



A. TOOLS/INSTRUMENTS DEVELOPED FOR HOUSEHOLDS

# NAME OF THE TOOL/INVEST MODEL PROJECT TITLENUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS

Actual results (cumulative since project started) Expected results Please describe how the tools, instruments, strategies, and activities developed by the project have helped households increase their adaptive or resilience


1

2

3

...

B. TOOLS/INSTRUMENTS DEVELOPED FOR COMMUNITIES

# NAME OF THE TOOL/INVEST MODEL PROJECT TITLENUMBER OF COMMUNITIES

Actual results (cumulative since project started) Expected results Please describe how the tools, instruments, strategies, and activities developed by the project have helped communities increase their adaptive or resilience


1

2

3

...

C. TOOLS/INSTRUMENTS DEVELOPED FOR PUBLIC SERVICES

# NAME OF THE TOOL/INVEST MODEL PROJECT TITLENUMBER OF PUBLIC SERVICES

Actual results (cumulative since project started) Expected results Please describe how the tools, instruments, strategies, and activities developed by the project have helped public services increase their adaptive or resilience


1

2

3

...

D. TOOLS/INSTRUMENTS DEVELOPED FOR BUSINESSES

# NAME OF THE TOOL/INVEST MODEL PROJECT TITLENUMBER OF BUSINESSES

Actual results (cumulative since project started) Expected results Please describe how the tools, instruments, strategies, and activities developed by the project have helped businesses increase their adaptive or resilience


1

2

3

...

| 46 |


PPCR CORE INDICATOR 5 Number of people supported by PPCR to cope with the effects of climate change

RATIONALE

This indicator determines whether PPCR projects/programs for climate resilience action

reach and support people as intended. It is linked to PPCR policy priorities as articulated in

the PPCR Design Document4 and seeks to understand how projects/programs contribute to

PPCR transformative impact goals of increasing the resilience of households, communities,

businesses, and sectors; supporting people on the ground; and rendering society more

resilient in the face of climate variability and climate change.

This indicator estimates the number of people supported by PPCR to cope with the effects

of climate change in a country or region. This includes both direct and indirect beneficiaries,

as further defined.

SUB-QUESTIONS AND METHODOLOGY

Core Indicator 5 is quantitative in nature, and all projects/programs under

implementation monitor and report on it annually using the reporting instrument PPCR

Table 5. The PPCR country focal point then aggregates all project-level response data into

one Table 5 at the SPCR level, taking care to avoid double counting. The annual scoring

workshop validates this national-level table.

In Year 1, the scoring workshop establishes baselines and targets for Core Indicator 5.

It measures new activity as a result of PPCR-funded interventions, so the baseline is

set to 0 and the target is calculated by aggregating the project-level expected results.

As new PPCR projects begin implementation, expected results for Indicators 5 must

be recalculated.

5 PPCR Design Document: https://www.climateinvestmentfunds.org/node/12145

>>

5


| 47 |

5SUB-QUESTIONS AND METHODOLOGY (continued)

The following questions on Table 5 seek to measure Core Indicator 5:

1. How many people have been supported by PPCR to cope with the effects of

climate change? (REQUIRED)

The sum of those supported are reported as the cumulative number of people supported

at the project/program level and at the SPCR level up until December 31 of the reporting

period. The cumulative total is reported over the life of the SPCR. Some projects/

programs may be completed before the completion date of the SPCR.

2. How many of those supported by PPCR to cope with the effects of climate

change are below the national poverty line? (OPTIONAL)

Whenever possible, it is encouraged to collect and report the number of people below the

national poverty line who are supported by PPCR.

3. How many females have been supported by PPCR to cope with the effects of

climate change? (REQUIRED)

The number of females supported is reported, especially for projects/programs that

target women or projects/programs that have already conducted in-depth social analysis.

By proxy, the number of males supported by PPCR can be calculated. Countries may

include these data as disaggregated, labelling them clearly as such in Table 5.


In assessing Core Indicator 5, it is important to consider overarching definitions that

guide all CIF funding programs, including PPCR, and specific definitions that pertain

specifically to PPCR.

CIF GUIDANCE ON MEASURING THE NUMBER OF BENEFICIARIES

Beneficiaries are people who have been reached or supported by any activities

financed or implemented through CIF programs, projects, or sub-projects. People

supported corresponds to discrete individuals, populations, or households having a

clearly discernible relationship to the intervention in question and its intended outputs,

outcomes, and/or impacts. The aggregated number of beneficiaries reached through CIF

is based on a distinction between direct beneficiaries and indirect beneficiaries.

>>

>>

| 48 |


5 TECHNICAL DEFINITIONS (continued)

Direct beneficiaries of CIF are people or members of households who are specifically

targeted by a CIF program, project, or sub-project to receive support to which CIF has

contributed. These people are counted individually. They must be aware that support

is being received5. The implication of contribution to CIF means that a clear causal

relationship can be established between the nature of the beneficiary’s involvement and

the specific program or project activities undertaken by CIF or its partners. In most cases,

direct beneficiaries are clearly specified in a CIF project’s design and results matrix.

Common examples of direct beneficiaries across CIF programming include:

• People who directly participate in trainings

• Recipients of agricultural services

• People with improved energy access due to a CIF activity

• People residing in the catchment area of a CIF-supported infrastructure project or

other material public good intended to affect them

• Recipients of other grants/services directly provided through a CIF intervention

Indirect beneficiaries of CIF are individual people or members of households who

either:

a) Receive benefits that are not closely related to the project design’s specific

outputs, outcomes, and impacts of interest; or

b) Are not targeted to receive benefits from the project (i.e., positive spillover

effects).

The implication of a contribution from CIF toward a specific benefit means that a

relationship can be drawn between the benefit and a corresponding CIF activity, but the

benefit may result from many additional factors apart from the CIF intervention, (i.e.,

indirect causal link).

Beneficiaries only need to qualify as (a) or (b), not necessarily both, to be considered an

indirect beneficiary. Common examples of indirect beneficiaries across CIF programming

include:

• People receiving advocacy messaging from a CIF-supported project

• People receiving livelihood co-benefits that are not a part of the project’s core

development objective (e.g., health improvements, access to education, or income

generation)

• People beyond the immediate catchment area of a project who are measurably reached

>>

>>

6 Adapted from the Department for International Development, UK, ICF KPI 1


| 49 |

5TECHNICAL DEFINITIONS (continued)

PPCR GUIDANCE ON MEASURING THE NUMBER OF BENEFICIARIES

People are considered supported by PPCR to cope with the effects of climate change

when a service or facility has specifically been made available to them through relevant

projects/programs of PPCR. The emphasis is on availability of the service. It does not

include support for planning processes, knowledge and evidence gathering, or other

building block processes, unless the supported population can be discretely identified.

Direct beneficiaries of PPCR are people who have been targeted to make use of a

service or facility made available to them through relevant projects/programs of PPCR.

Examples include the following:

• Enabling environment: People who are directly trained

• Agriculture: People who receive seeds or extension services

• Coastal zone management: People directly protected by a flood wall as defined in

project results frameworks

• Resilient infrastructure: Targeted population for disaster shelters, resilient schools,

or other services

• Adaptation finance: People receiving direct access to finance or loans

Indirect beneficiaries of PPCR are people who may use a service or facility made

available through relevant projects/programs of PPCR, but have not been specifically

targeted to do so, or those who have otherwise benefitted from the contribution of PPCR

activities that are secondary to primary outcomes of interest. Examples include the

following:

• Hydromet and climate information services: People who receive information from

a climate risk warning system (They would only be counted as direct beneficiaries

if this is a core aim of the project objective, rather than an intermediate activity.)

• People receiving advocacy messaging from radio campaigns

PPCR investments in policy support, public sector technical assistance, or planning do

not contribute to the number of beneficiaries counted in the general population. For

example, people falling within the administrative area of an institution receiving capacity

building support or residing under a forest or water resources management plan are not

counted. Government officials directly trained or supported through these investments

are counted as direct beneficiaries.

>>

>>

| 50 |


5TECHNICAL DEFINITIONS (continued)

The number of people supported should not be discounted in interventions only partly

funded by PPCR. Each person supported by PPCR should only be counted once, even if

(s)he benefits from multiple interventions.

Relevant projects/programs are those that include targeted climate resilience

interventions in the sectors identified as a priority in the SPCR. It does not include

programs that support planning processes, knowledge and evidence gathering, or other

building blocks processes unless the supported population can be discretely identified.

These programs are covered by Core Indicators 3 and 4.

For example, modernizing a national hydromet service cannot be counted in Indicator 5;

however, a functioning early flood-warning system in 20 districts (using that hydromet

data) could, since a discrete population has been identified.

For Indicator 5, PPCR countries report the number of direct beneficiaries and the

number of indirect beneficiaries.

The CIF Administrative Unit aggregates this information into the total number of

beneficiaries (direct and indirect) supported by PPCR.


All efforts are made to use recent data sourced from national systems (e.g., population

data). Data may be available from the census bureau or other census information

institutions, public offices, or institutions with development projects/programs in their area.

If recent data is not available in national systems, project/program-specific surveys,

including baseline surveys, are used to monitor the number of targeted (direct)

beneficiaries of each project/program.

The number of people supported is collected on the level of the individual (number of

people, women, men); however, for reporting, data will be expressed as number of people,

disaggregated by sex. When counting households, the assumptions about household size

and gender ratio needed for disaggregation are documented in the reporting table.

Where social vulnerability baseline surveys and analyses have been conducted,

monitoring allows for disaggregation of the number of female beneficiaries.

The respective project/program coordinator and the PPCR country focal point store all

relevant information that informs reporting (i.e., the evidence base) for future reference.

REPORTING TOOLS

The blank template for PPCR Table 5 follows. It is available to all countries and is

maintained from year to year to track the evolution of data as the SPCR progresses.

>>

PPCR SCORECARD 5

| 52 |


5

INSTRUCTIONS: 1. Actual results: Cumulatively report the number of people supported by the project since it started implementation. 2. Expected results: Number of people expected to be reached by the project at completion, as stated in the project document. 3. If the target population of the project is households or communities, provide best estimate of the number of people in these households or communities. Triangulate this data with data provided in Table 4 for consistency. 4.Please do not leave cells blank. Put zero (0) in the corresponding cell if people are not supported yet by the project.


PPCR CORE INDICATOR 5: NUMBER OF PEOPLE SUPPORTED BY PPCR TO COPE WITH THE EFFECTS OF CLIMATE CHANGEDATA COLLECTION METHOD: DATA COLLECTED FOR EACH PROJECT AND COMPILED AT THE SPCR LEVEL

SAMPLE



DIRECT BENEFICIARIES INDIRECT BENEFICIARIES TOTAL BENEFICIARIES

ACTUAL RESULTS (CUMULATIVE SINCE PROJECT STARTED) EXPECTED RESULTS ACTUAL RESULTS (CUMULATIVE

SINCE PROJECT STARTED) EXPECTED RESULTS ACTUAL RESULTS (CUMULATIVE SINCE PROJECT STARTED) EXPECTED RESULTS

PROJECT TITLE A B C D E F G

PROJECT# 1

Number of people supported by PPCR to cope with the effects of climate change (n1)

Number of people below the national poverty line supported by PPCR to cope with the effects of climate change (n2)

Females supported by PPCR to cope with the effects of climate change (n3)

PROJECT# 2

Number of people supported by PPCR to cope with the effects of climate change (m1)

Number of people below the national poverty line supported by PPCR to cope with the effects of climate change (m2)

Females supported by PPCR to cope with the effects of climate change (m3)

COUNTRY

Total number of people supported by PPCR to cope with the effects of climate change in the country (n1+m1)

Total number of people below the national poverty line supported by PPCR to cope with the effects of climate change in the country (n2+m2)

Total number of females supported by PPCR to cope with the effects of climate change in the country (n3+m3)


| 53 |

5

LESSONS LEARNEDWhat have been the key successes when people have been supported by PPCR?



PPCR CORE INDICATOR 5: NUMBER OF PEOPLE SUPPORTED BY PPCR TO COPE WITH THE EFFECTS OF CLIMATE CHANGEDATA COLLECTION METHOD: DATA COLLECTED FOR EACH PROJECT AND COMPILED AT THE SPCR LEVEL

SAMPLE



DIRECT BENEFICIARIES INDIRECT BENEFICIARIES TOTAL BENEFICIARIES

ACTUAL RESULTS (CUMULATIVE SINCE PROJECT STARTED) EXPECTED RESULTS ACTUAL RESULTS (CUMULATIVE

SINCE PROJECT STARTED) EXPECTED RESULTS ACTUAL RESULTS (CUMULATIVE SINCE PROJECT STARTED) EXPECTED RESULTS

PROJECT TITLE A B C D E F G

PROJECT# 1

Number of people supported by PPCR to cope with the effects of climate change (n1)

Number of people below the national poverty line supported by PPCR to cope with the effects of climate change (n2)

Females supported by PPCR to cope with the effects of climate change (n3)

PROJECT# 2

Number of people supported by PPCR to cope with the effects of climate change (m1)

Number of people below the national poverty line supported by PPCR to cope with the effects of climate change (m2)

Females supported by PPCR to cope with the effects of climate change (m3)

COUNTRY

Total number of people supported by PPCR to cope with the effects of climate change in the country (n1+m1)

Total number of people below the national poverty line supported by PPCR to cope with the effects of climate change in the country (n2+m2)

Total number of females supported by PPCR to cope with the effects of climate change in the country (n3+m3)

Project results in 2016 indicate that the CLIMADAPT climate resilience financing facility in Tajikistan has a loan portfolio exceeding $3.8 million that is reaching more than 1,400 households, farmers, and small and medium-sized businesses, and contributing to the dissemination of technologies such as drip irrigation, greenhouses, and solar panels.

©EBRD

| 55 |

ANNEX 1 PPCR Revised Results Framework

56ANNEX 2 Example of scoring criteria for Core Indicator 1

58

ANNEX 3 Example of scoring criteria for Core Indicator 2

60

ANNEX 4 Example of scoring criteria for Core Indicator 3

61

ANNEXES

ANNEX 5 Example of Scorecard 1 for Core Indicator 1

62


65


72

ANNEX 8 Scoring Workshop Summary Form

76

| 56 |


This toolkit is designed to support the implementation of the Revised PPCR Results Framework7

adopted by the PPCR Sub-Committee in 2012. It establishes a basis for monitoring and evaluation of the

impact, outcomes, and outputs of PPCR-funded activities. The logic model depicts the cause and effect

chain of results from inputs and activities through to project outputs, program outcomes, and national/

international impacts. PPCR results indicators, including the five core (highlighted in yellow), are added

to show where they fall in results chain.

7 Available at: https://www.climateinvestmentfunds.org/sites/default/files/meeting-documents/revised_ppcr_results_framework_0.pdf

Annex 1 PPCR REVISED RESULTS FRAMEWORK

https://www.climateinvestmentfunds.org/sites/default/files/meeting-documents/revised_ppcr_results_framework_0.pdf

ANNEXES

PPCR

REV

ISED

LOGI

C M

ODEL

WIT

H IN

DICA

TORS

GL

OB

AL

C

IF F

INA

L O

UT

CO

ME

(1

5 –

20

yrs

) to

par

tici

pate

in

sco

rin

g w

ork

sho

p

CO

UN

TR

Y

CO

NT

RIB

UT

ION

O

F S

PC

R T

O

TR

AN

SF

OR

MA

TIV

E

IMP

AC

T(1

0-2

0 y

rs /

nat

ion

al le

vel)

CO

UN

TR

Y

SP

CR

OU

TC

OM

ES

A1.

2 C

han

ge

in

loss

es/d

amag

es

fro

m C

C/C

R in

PP

CR

ar

eas

B2

. Evi

den

ce o

f st

ren

gth

ened

g

over

nm

ent

capa

city

an

d c

oo

rdin

atio

n

mec

han

ism

to

m

ain

stre

am C

R

A2

.2 C

han

ge

in

bu

dg

et a

lloca

tio

ns

to s

up

po

rt C

C/C

V

A1.

3 #

of

peo

ple

su

pp

ort

ed b

y P

PC

R t

o c

op

e w

ith

C

C/C

R

A1.

4 %

of

peo

ple

w

ith

yea

r ro

un

d

acce

ss t

o w

ater

Impro

ved

clim

ate

res

ilie

nt

dev

elopm

ent

con

sist

ent

wit

h o

ther

CIF

obje

ctiv

es

A1. I

ncr

ease

d r

esilie

nce

of

hou

seh

old

s, c

om

mu

nit

ies,

bu

sin

esse

s,

sect

ors

an

d s

oci

ety

to c

lim

ate

vari

abilit

y a

nd c

lim

ate

ch

an

ge.

In o

rder

to p

repare

for

an

d r

espon

d t

o c

lim

ate

vari

abilit

y a

nd c

lim

ate

ch

an

ge

…

A2. S

tren

gth

ened

clim

ate

res

pon

sive

dev

elopm

ent

pla

nn

ing

A1.1

Ch

ang

e in

% o

f h

h w

ho

se li

velih

oo

ds

hav

e im

pro

ved

B1.

Ext

ent

to

wh

ich

vu

lner

able

H

H, c

om

mu

nit

ies,

b

usi

nes

ses

and

pu

blic

se

cto

r u

se im

pro

ved

P

PC

R s

up

po

rted

to

ols

A2

.1 D

egre

e of

in

teg

rati

on

of

CC

in

nat

ion

al in

clu

din

g

sect

or

pla

nn

ing

B1.

Ad

apti

ve

cap

acit

ies

stre

ng

the

ne

dB

2. I

nst

itu

tio

nal

fr

amew

ork

s im

pro

ved

B3

. Clim

ate

in

form

atio

n in

d

eci

sio

n m

akin

g

rou

tin

ely

ap

plie

d

B4

. Se

cto

r p

lan

nin

g,

and

re

gu

lati

on

fo

r cl

imat

e r

esili

en

ce

imp

rove

d

B5

. Clim

ate

re

spo

nsi

ve in

vest

me

nt

ap

pro

ach

es id

en

tifi

ed

an

d im

ple

me

nte

d

B3

. Evi

den

ce

show

ing

th

at

clim

ate

info

rmat

ion

, p

rod

uct

s/ s

ervi

ces

are

use

d in

dec

isio

n

mak

ing

in c

limat

e se

nsi

tive

sec

tors

B4

. Lev

erag

e of

P

PC

R f

un

din

g

agai

nst

pu

blic

&

pri

vate

inve

stm

ents

in

clim

ate

sen

siti

ve

sect

ors

B5

. Qu

alit

y of

&

exte

nt

to w

hic

h

clim

ate

resp

on

sive

in

stru

men

ts/

inve

stm

ent

mo

del

s ar

e d

evel

op

ed &

te

sted

NOTE

: Cor

e in

dica

tor1

is A2

.1. Co

re in

dica

tor 2

is B

2. C

ore

indi

cato

r 3 is

B5.

Cor

e in

dica

tor 4

is B

1. Co

re in

dica

tor 5

is A

1.3.

| 58 |

PPCR MONITORING AND REPORTING TOOLKITA

nnex

2E

XA

MP

LE

OF

SC

OR

ING

CR

ITE

RIA

FO

R C

OR

E IN

DIC

ATO

R 1

SCORE

IS T

HERE

AN

APPR

OVED

CLI

MAT

E CH

ANGE

PLA

N FO

R TH

E NA

TION

/SE

CTOR

?

HAVE

CLI

MAT

E RE

SILI

ENCE

STR

ATEG

IES

BEEN

EM

BEDD

ED IN

THE

CEN

TRAL

GO

VERN

MEN

T’S/

SECT

OR’S

PRI

NCIP

AL

PLAN

NING

DOC

UMEN

TS

HAS

RESP

ONSI

BILI

TY B

EEN

ASSI

GNED

TO

INST

ITUT

IONS

OR

PERS

ONS

TO

INTE

GRAT

E CL

IMAT

E RE

SILI

ENCE

PL

ANNI

NG?

HAVE

SPE

CIFI

C M

EASU

RES

TO A

DDRE

SS

CLIM

ATE

RESI

LIEN

CE B

EEN

IDEN

TIFI

ED

AND

PRIO

RITI

ZED?

E.G

. INV

ESTM

ENTS

AN

D PR

OGRA

MS.

DO A

LL P

LANN

ING

PROC

ESSE

S RO

UTIN

ELY

SCRE

EN F

OR C

LIM

ATE

RISK

S?

0No

, doe

s no

t exi

st.

No c

limat

e re

silie

nce

stra

tegi

es

avai

labl

e.No

clim

ate

resi

lienc

e pl

anni

ng is

bei

ng

unde

rtak

enNo

spe

cific

mea

sure

s (in

vest

men

ts

and

prog

ram

s) to

add

ress

clim

ate

resi

lienc

e ha

ve b

een

iden

tifie

d.

No

1Th

ere

is a

con

cret

e pl

an fo

r its

de

velo

pmen

t.Pl

ans

are

in p

lace

to in

corp

orat

e cl

imat

e ch

ange

str

ateg

ies

into

cen

tral

Go

vern

men

t’s p

rinci

pal p

lann

ing

docu

men

ts

Plan

s ar

e in

pla

ce to

ass

ign

an

indi

vidu

al o

r ins

titut

ion

with

the

resp

onsi

bilit

y of

inte

grat

ing

clim

ate

resi

lienc

e pl

anni

ng in

to n

atio

nal

deve

lopm

ent p

lann

ing

Plan

s ar

e in

pla

ce to

iden

tify

spec

ific

mea

sure

s to

add

ress

clim

ate

resi

lienc

e

Plan

s ar

e in

pla

ce to

iden

tify

spec

ific

mea

sure

s to

rout

inel

y sc

reen

for

clim

ate

risks

2W

ork

has

rece

ntly

beg

un o

n th

e de

velo

pmen

t of a

clim

ate

chan

ge p

lan

Wor

k ha

s re

cent

ly b

egun

on

the

inco

rpor

atio

n of

str

ateg

ies

into

ce

ntra

l gov

ernm

ent’s

prin

cipa

l pl

anni

ng d

ocum

ents

Wor

k ha

s re

cent

ly c

omm

ence

d on

bu

dget

pro

gram

min

g an

d dr

aftin

g TO

Rs to

inte

grat

e cl

imat

e re

silie

nce

plan

ning

into

nat

iona

l dev

elop

men

t pl

anni

ng b

ut is

pro

gres

sing

slo

wly

.

Wor

k ha

s re

cent

ly c

omm

ence

d on

the

iden

tific

atio

n of

mea

sure

s to

add

ress

cl

imat

e ch

ange

The

auth

oriti

es h

ave

rece

ntly

sta

rted

to

scr

een

for c

limat

e ris

ks

3W

ork

on th

e de

velo

pmen

t of a

clim

ate

chan

ge p

lan

has

com

men

ced

but i

s pr

ogre

ssin

g sl

owly

Wor

k ha

s be

gun

on th

e in

corp

orat

ion

of s

trat

egie

s in

cen

tral

Gov

ernm

ent’s

pr

inci

pal p

lann

ing

docu

men

ts, b

ut it

is

prog

ress

ing

too

slow

ly.

Draf

t ter

ms

or re

fere

nces

and

bud

gets

w

ere

prep

ared

to a

ssig

n Pe

rson

nel

or in

stitu

tions

or p

erso

nnel

with

the

resp

onsi

bilit

y of

inte

grat

ing

clim

ate

resi

lienc

e pl

anni

ng in

to n

atio

nal

deve

lopm

ent p

lann

ing.

Wor

k ha

s re

cent

ly b

egun

on

the

iden

tific

atio

n of

mea

sure

s to

add

ress

cl

imat

e ch

ange

, but

it is

pro

gres

sing

to

o sl

owly

.

The

auth

oriti

es h

ave

rece

ntly

beg

un

to s

cree

n fo

r clim

ate

risks

, with

slo

w

prog

ress

4Ex

ists

in d

raft

form

.cl

imat

e ch

ange

str

ateg

ies

are

embe

dded

into

cen

tral

gov

ernm

ent’s

pr

inci

pal p

lann

ing

docu

men

ts, w

hich

ex

ist i

n dr

aft f

orm

Pers

onne

l or i

nstit

utio

ns w

ere

enga

ged

to in

tegr

ate

clim

ate

resi

lienc

e pl

anni

ng in

to n

atio

nal

deve

lopm

ent p

lann

ing.

Spec

ific

mea

sure

s (in

vest

men

ts

and

prog

ram

s) to

add

ress

clim

ate

resi

lienc

e ha

s be

en id

entif

ied,

but

ex

ist i

n dr

aft f

orm

Yes,

ther

e ha

s be

en s

ome

pilo

t sc

reen

ing

for C

limat

e Ch

ange

risk

s in

a

sele

ctio

n of

pro

ject

s, bu

t scr

eeni

ng

is n

ot m

anda

tory

5Ex

ists

and

is a

ppro

ved

but i

s no

t bei

ng

impl

emen

ted.

Clim

ate

resi

lienc

e st

rate

gies

are

em

bedd

ed in

to th

e se

ctor

’s pr

inci

pal

plan

ning

doc

umen

t, bu

t are

not

bei

ng

used

Resp

onsi

bilit

y ha

s be

en a

ssig

ned

to in

stitu

tion/

pers

on, s

uppo

rted

by

appr

oved

bud

gets

and

gui

ded

by

appr

opria

te te

rms

of re

fere

nces

or j

ob

desc

riptio

ns

Spec

ific

mea

sure

s (in

vest

men

ts

and

prog

ram

s) to

add

ress

clim

ate

resi

lienc

e ha

ve b

een

iden

tifie

d an

d ap

prov

ed, b

ut th

ey h

ave

not b

een

impl

emen

ted.

Man

dato

ry p

ilot s

cree

ning

for C

limat

e Ch

ange

risk

s ar

e co

nduc

ted

in

proj

ects

.

>>

DEGR

EE O

F IN

TEGR

ATIO

N OF

CLI

MAT

E CH

ANGE

IN N

ATIO

NAL,

INCL

UDIN

G SE

CTOR

, PLA

NNIN

G

ANNEXES

| 59 |

SCORE

IS T

HERE

AN

APPR

OVED

CLI

MAT

E CH

ANGE

PLA

N FO

R TH

E NA

TION

/SE

CTOR

?

HAVE

CLI

MAT

E RE

SILI

ENCE

STR

ATEG

IES

BEEN

EM

BEDD

ED IN

THE

CEN

TRAL

GO

VERN

MEN

T’S/

SECT

OR’S

PRI

NCIP

AL

PLAN

NING

DOC

UMEN

TS

HAS

RESP

ONSI

BILI

TY B

EEN

ASSI

GNED

TO

INST

ITUT

IONS

OR

PERS

ONS

TO

INTE

GRAT

E CL

IMAT

E RE

SILI

ENCE

PL

ANNI

NG?

HAVE

SPE

CIFI

C M

EASU

RES

TO A

DDRE

SS

CLIM

ATE

RESI

LIEN

CE B

EEN

IDEN

TIFI

ED

AND

PRIO

RITI

ZED?

E.G

. INV

ESTM

ENTS

AN

D PR

OGRA

MS.

DO A

LL P

LANN

ING

PROC

ESSE

S RO

UTIN

ELY

SCRE

EN F

OR C

LIM

ATE

RISK

S?

6Ex

ists

, is

appr

oved

and

func

tioni

ng

with

tang

ible

exa

mpl

es o

f its

im

plem

enta

tion,

but

maj

or

impr

ovem

ents

are

impr

ovem

ents

ne

eded

whi

ch h

ave

not b

een

clea

rly

iden

tifie

d.

Clim

ate

resi

lienc

e st

rate

gies

are

em

bedd

ed in

to c

entr

al G

over

nmen

ts

plan

ning

doc

umen

ts a

nd a

re b

eing

us

ed in

pla

nnin

g de

cisi

ons.

But m

ajor

im

prov

emen

ts a

re n

eede

d, w

hich

hav

e no

t bee

n id

entif

ied.

Resp

onsi

bilit

y ha

s be

en a

ssig

ned

to in

stitu

tion/

pers

on, s

uppo

rted

by

appr

oved

bud

gets

and

gui

ded

by

appr

opria

te te

rms

of re

fere

nces

or j

ob

desc

riptio

ns, b

ut w

ith n

o im

pact

on

deve

lopm

enta

l pla

nnin

g

Spec

ific

mea

sure

s (in

vest

men

ts

and

prog

ram

s) to

add

ress

clim

ate

resi

lienc

e ha

ve b

een

iden

tifie

d an

d ap

prov

ed, b

ut a

pplic

atio

n ha

s no

t bee

n co

nsis

tent

thro

ugho

ut

depa

rtm

enta

l act

iviti

es.

Scre

enin

g is

man

date

d bu

t app

licat

ion

has

not b

een

cons

iste

nt th

roug

hout

de

part

men

tal a

ctiv

ities

.

7Ex

ists

, is

appr

oved

and

func

tioni

ng

with

tang

ible

exa

mpl

es o

f its

im

plem

enta

tion,

but

maj

or

impr

ovem

ents

are

nee

ded

whi

ch a

re

part

ially

iden

tifie

d.

Clim

ate

resi

lienc

e st

rate

gies

are

em

bedd

ed in

to c

entr

al g

over

nmen

t pl

anni

ng d

ocum

ents

and

are

bei

ng

used

in p

lann

ing

deci

sion

s. M

ajor

im

prov

emen

ts a

re n

eede

d, w

hich

hav

e pa

rtia

lly b

een

iden

tifie

d.

Resp

onsi

bilit

y ha

s be

en a

ssig

ned

to in

stitu

tion/

pers

on, s

uppo

rted

by

appr

oved

bud

gets

and

gui

ded

by

appr

opria

te te

rms

of re

fere

nces

or j

ob

desc

riptio

ns, b

ut w

ith li

ttle

impa

ct o

n de

velo

pmen

tal p

lann

ing

Spec

ific

mea

sure

s ha

ve b

een

used

in v

ario

us s

ecto

rs, b

ut m

ajor

im

prov

emen

ts a

re n

eede

d, w

hich

hav

e be

en p

artia

lly id

entif

ied

Scre

enin

g is

man

date

d an

d is

co

nduc

ted

thro

ugho

ut d

epar

tmen

tal

activ

ities

. but

maj

or im

prov

emen

ts

are

need

ed w

hich

are

par

tially

id

entif

ied

8Ex

ists

, is

appr

oved

and

func

tioni

ng

with

tang

ible

exa

mpl

es o

f its

im

plem

enta

tion

but m

inor

im

prov

emen

ts a

re n

eede

d w

hich

are

id

entif

ied

Clim

ate

resi

lienc

e st

rate

gies

are

bei

ng

used

to in

form

impl

emen

tatio

n of

se

ctor

act

iviti

es a

nd p

roje

cts,

with

m

oder

ate

effe

ct

Resp

onsi

bilit

y ha

s be

en a

ssig

ned

to in

stitu

tion/

pers

on, s

uppo

rted

by

appr

oved

bud

gets

and

gui

ded

by

appr

opria

te te

rms

of re

fere

nces

or j

ob

desc

riptio

ns, w

ith m

oder

ate

impa

ct o

n de

velo

pmen

tal p

lann

ing

Spec

ific

mea

sure

s ha

ve b

een

used

in v

ario

us s

ecto

rs, b

ut m

inor

im

prov

emen

ts a

re n

eede

d w

hich

hav

e be

en id

entif

ied

Scre

enin

g is

man

date

d an

d is

co

nduc

ted

thro

ugho

ut d

epar

tmen

tal

activ

ities

. but

min

or im

prov

emen

ts

are

need

ed w

hich

hav

e be

en p

artia

lly

iden

tifie

d

9Ye

s, ex

ists

and

nee

ds n

o si

gnifi

cant

im

prov

emen

t as

it al

so b

eing

im

plem

ente

d w

ell.

Clim

ate

resi

lienc

e st

rate

gies

are

bei

ng

used

to in

form

impl

emen

tatio

n of

se

ctor

act

iviti

es a

nd p

roje

cts,

with

m

ajor

effe

ct

Resp

onsi

bilit

y ha

s be

en a

ssig

ned

to in

stitu

tion/

pers

on, s

uppo

rted

by

appr

oved

bud

gets

and

gui

ded

by

appr

opria

te te

rms

of re

fere

nces

or

job

desc

riptio

ns, w

ith g

reat

impa

ct o

n de

velo

pmen

tal p

lann

ing

Yes,

spec

ific

mea

sure

s ha

ve b

een

cons

iste

ntly

impl

emen

ted

acro

ss

depa

rtm

enta

l act

iviti

es.

Yes,

scre

enin

g is

con

sist

ently

app

lied

acro

ss d

epar

tmen

tal a

ctiv

ities

, with

gr

eat e

ffect

iven

ess

10Ye

s, ex

ists

and

nee

ds n

o im

prov

emen

t as

it a

lso

bein

g im

plem

ente

d w

ell.

Clim

ate

resi

lienc

e st

rate

gies

are

use

d in

pla

nnin

g de

cisi

ons,

with

no

need

to

be c

ompl

emen

ted

by o

ther

str

ateg

ies

No n

eed

to re

vise

role

s/re

spon

sibi

litie

s of

per

sonn

el o

r in

stitu

tions

invo

lved

in c

limat

e re

silie

nce

plan

ning

No n

ew m

easu

res

are

need

ed to

ad

dres

s cl

imat

e ch

ange

Ther

e is

no

need

to u

pgra

de s

cree

ning

pr

oces

ses

Adap

ted

from

Sai

nt V

ince

nt a

nd th

e Gr

enad

ines

>>

| 60 |

PPCR MONITORING AND REPORTING TOOLKITSCORE

ARE

INFO

RMAT

ION,

STU

DIES

AND

ASS

ESSM

ENTS

AD

DRES

SING

CLI

MAT

E CH

ANGE

, VAR

IABI

LITY

AND

RE

SILI

ENCE

AVA

ILAB

LE?

IS T

HE N

ECES

SARY

CLI

MAT

E CH

ANGE

EXP

ERTI

SE

AVAI

LABL

E?DO

NAT

IONA

L/SE

CTOR

INCE

NTIV

ES A

ND

LEGI

SLAT

IVE

POLI

CIES

EXP

RESS

LY A

DDRE

SS

CLIM

ATE

CHAN

GE A

ND R

ESIL

IENC

E?

DOES

THE

GOV

ERNM

ENT/

SEC

TOR

PART

ICIP

ATE

IN

A CR

OSS-

SECT

ORAL

COO

RDIN

ATIO

N M

ECHA

NISM

FO

R CL

IMAT

E CH

ANGE

ACT

IVIT

IES?

0

Ther

e ar

e no

exi

stin

g st

udie

s/in

form

atio

n or

as

sess

men

ts a

vaila

ble.

No c

limat

e ch

ange

exp

ertis

e av

aila

ble.

No n

atio

nal/s

ecto

r inc

entiv

es a

nd le

gisl

ativ

e po

licie

s ex

ist.

No c

ross

-sec

tora

l coo

rdin

atio

n m

echa

nism

for

clim

ate

chan

ge a

ctiv

ities

exi

st.

1-2

Som

e st

udie

s ha

ve b

een

com

mis

sion

ed b

ut n

ot

com

plet

ed.

Som

e de

part

men

t offi

cial

s ha

ve a

tten

ded

clim

ate

chan

ge tr

aini

ng c

ours

es.

Draf

t nat

iona

l/sec

tor i

ncen

tives

and

legi

slat

ive

polic

ies

are

bein

g de

velo

ped.

Yes,

ther

e is

a c

ross

-sec

tora

l coo

rdin

atio

n m

echa

nism

how

ever

it is

not

bei

ng u

tiliz

ed.

3 - 4

Som

e st

udie

s, as

sess

men

ts a

nd in

form

atio

n on

cl

imat

e ch

ange

, var

iabi

lity

and

resi

lienc

e ex

ist,

but t

he is

sues

that

they

add

ress

are

ver

y lim

ited

Ther

e ar

e a

few

per

sons

who

are

trai

ned

in

clim

ate

chan

ge re

silie

nce

and

have

exp

erie

nce

impl

emen

ting

clim

ate

chan

ge re

silie

nce

proj

ects

.

Draf

t of n

atio

nal/s

ecto

r inc

entiv

es a

nd

legi

slat

ive

polic

ies

exis

t but

not

yet

fina

lized

. A

cro

ss-s

ectio

nal c

oord

inat

ion

mec

hani

sm fo

r cl

imat

e ch

ange

act

iviti

es e

xist

with

som

e le

vel

of p

artic

ipat

ion

5 - 6

Som

e st

udie

s, as

sess

men

ts a

nd in

form

atio

n on

cl

imat

e ch

ange

, var

iabi

lity

and

resi

lienc

e ex

ist,

but t

he is

sues

whi

ch th

ey a

ddre

ss b

ut th

ey d

o no

t cov

er a

ll is

sues

.

Seve

ral p

erso

ns in

som

e de

part

men

ts/s

ecto

rs

have

bee

n tr

aine

d an

d ar

e qu

alifi

ed in

clim

ate

chan

ge re

silie

nce

Natio

nal/s

ecto

r inc

entiv

es a

nd le

gisl

ativ

e po

licie

s th

at a

ddre

ss c

limat

e ch

ange

and

re

silie

nce

are

final

ized

, app

rove

d an

d be

ing

impl

emen

ted

in a

lim

ited

man

ner.

A cr

oss-

sect

oral

coo

rdin

atio

n m

echa

nism

for

clim

ate

chan

ge a

ctiv

ities

exi

st w

ith g

reat

er le

vel

of p

artic

ipat

ion.

7 - 8

Ther

e ar

e m

any

stud

ies,

asse

ssm

ents

and

in

form

atio

n av

aila

ble

whi

ch a

ddre

ss c

limat

e ch

ange

, var

iabi

lity

and

resi

lienc

e. T

hese

stu

dies

co

ver a

ll is

sues

and

are

wel

l und

erst

ood

by a

ll de

part

men

ts.

Ther

e is

at l

east

one

per

son

in m

ost

depa

rtm

ents

who

has

bee

n tr

aine

d an

d is

qu

alifi

ed in

clim

ate

chan

ge re

silie

nce

and

has

expe

rienc

e w

orki

ng o

n cl

imat

e ch

ange

pro

ject

s an

d pr

ogra

ms.

Ince

ntiv

es a

nd p

olic

ies

are

wid

e ra

ngin

g an

d co

ver,

but c

an b

e st

reng

then

ed

A c

ross

-sec

tiona

l coo

rdin

atio

n m

echa

nism

for

clim

ate

chan

ge a

ctiv

ities

exi

st a

ctiv

e sh

arin

g of

info

rmat

ion

and

som

e de

gree

of c

oord

inat

ed

plan

ning

9 - 10

Ther

e ar

e m

any

stud

ies,

asse

ssm

ents

and

in

form

atio

n av

aila

ble

whi

ch a

ddre

ss c

limat

e ch

ange

, var

iabi

lity

and

resi

lienc

e. T

hese

stu

dies

co

ver a

ll is

sues

and

are

wel

l und

erst

ood

by a

ll de

part

men

ts.

Ther

e is

ade

quat

e ex

pert

ise

in c

limat

e ch

ange

av

aila

ble

in m

ost d

epar

tmen

ts/a

genc

ies,

and

mos

t exp

erts

hav

e go

od e

xper

ienc

e w

orki

ng o

n cl

imat

e ch

ange

pro

ject

s an

d pr

ogra

ms.

Wid

e ra

ngin

g na

tiona

l/sec

tor i

ncen

tives

and

le

gisl

ativ

e po

licie

s ex

pres

sly

addr

ess

clim

ate

chan

ge re

silie

nce

and

are

fully

impl

emen

ted

and

upda

ted

as n

eces

sary

A fu

lly fu

nctio

nal c

ross

-sec

tora

l coo

rdin

atio

n m

echa

nism

for c

limat

e ch

ange

act

iviti

es e

xist

, w

ith a

ll re

quire

d se

ctor

s/go

vern

men

t age

ncie

s sh

arin

g in

form

atio

n an

d co

ordi

natin

g on

an

ongo

ing

basi

s.

Adap

ted

from

Gre

nada

Annex

3E

XA

MP

LE

OF

SC

OR

ING

CR

ITE

RIA

FO

R C

OR

E IN

DIC

ATO

R 2

EVID

ENCE

OF

STRE

NGTH

ENED

GOV

ERNM

ENT

CAPA

CITY

AND

COO

RDIN

ATIO

N M

ECHA

NISM

TO

MAI

NSTR

EAM

CLI

MAT

E RE

SILI

ENCE

ANNEXES

| 61 |

HAS

THE

INST

RUM

ENT/

INVE

STM

ENT

MOD

EL B

EEN

DEVE

LOPE

D AN

D TE

STED

?HA

S TH

E IN

STRU

MEN

T/IN

VEST

MEN

T M

ODEL

BEE

N IM

PLEM

ENTE

D TO

THE

SCA

LE P

ROPO

SED?

HAS

THE

INST

RUM

ENT/

INVE

STM

ENT

MOD

EL

APPR

OPRI

ATEL

Y IN

CORP

ORAT

ED T

HE N

EEDS

OF

BOTH

FEM

ALES

AND

MAL

ES IN

TO IT

S DE

SIGN

AND

IM

PLEM

ENTA

TION

?

HAS

THE

INST

RUM

ENT/

INVE

STM

ENT

MOD

EL

INCO

RPOR

ATED

THE

NEE

DS O

F VU

LNER

ABLE

PO

PULA

TION

S IN

TO IT

S DE

SIGN

AND

IM

PLEM

ENTA

TION

?

0

No te

chno

logy

or i

nfra

stru

ctur

e in

vest

men

t de

velo

ped

or te

sted

Tech

nolo

gy o

r inf

rast

ruct

ure

inve

stm

ent n

ot

impl

emen

ted

to th

e sc

ale

prop

osed

Tech

nolo

gy o

r inf

rast

ruct

ure

inve

stm

ent d

oes

not a

ppro

pria

tely

inco

rpor

ate

the

need

s of

bo

th fe

mal

es a

nd m

ales

into

its

desi

gn a

nd

impl

emen

tatio

n

Tech

nolo

gy o

r inf

rast

ruct

ure

inve

stm

ent

does

not

inco

rpor

ate

the

need

s of

vul

nera

ble

popu

latio

ns in

to it

s de

sign

and

impl

emen

tatio

n

1-2

TOR

and/

or s

peci

ficat

ions

dev

elop

ed, a

nd

proc

urem

ent c

omm

ence

dTe

chno

logy

or i

nfra

stru

ctur

e in

vest

men

t im

plem

ente

d up

to 3

0% o

f the

sca

le p

ropo

sed

Tech

nolo

gy o

r inf

rast

ruct

ure

inve

stm

ent

inco

rpor

ates

the

need

s of

1-2

vuln

erab

le

popu

latio

ns in

to it

s de

sign

3 - 4

Proc

urem

ent f

ar a

dvan

ced

or c

ompl

eted

Tech

nolo

gy o

r inf

rast

ruct

ure

inve

stm

ent

impl

emen

ted

up to

50%

of t

he s

cale

pro

pose

dTe

chno

logy

or i

nfra

stru

ctur

e in

vest

men

t in

corp

orat

es th

e ne

eds

of 3

-4 v

ulne

rabl

e po

pula

tions

into

its

desi

gn

5 - 6

Tech

nolo

gy o

r inf

rast

ruct

ure

inve

stm

ent

deve

lope

d (e

quip

men

t ins

talle

d, tr

aini

ng

cond

ucte

d)

Tech

nolo

gy o

r inf

rast

ruct

ure

inve

stm

ent

impl

emen

ted

up to

70%

of t

he s

cale

pro

pose

dTe

chno

logy

or i

nfra

stru

ctur

e in

vest

men

t ap

prop

riate

ly in

corp

orat

es th

e ne

eds

of b

oth

fem

ales

and

mal

es in

to it

s de

sign

onl

y

Tech

nolo

gy o

r inf

rast

ruct

ure

inve

stm

ent

inco

rpor

ates

the

need

s of

all

vuln

erab

le

popu

latio

ns in

to it

s de

sign

7 - 8

Tech

nolo

gy o

r inf

rast

ruct

ure

inve

stm

ent b

eing

te

sted

, sys

tem

/equ

ipm

ent b

eing

cal

ibra

ted

Tech

nolo

gy o

r inf

rast

ruct

ure

inve

stm

ent

impl

emen

ted

up to

90%

of t

he s

cale

pro

pose

dTe

chno

logy

or i

nfra

stru

ctur

e in

vest

men

t in

corp

orat

es th

e ne

eds

of 1-

3 vu

lner

able

po

pula

tions

into

its

desi

gn a

nd im

plem

enta

tion

9 - 10

Tech

nolo

gy o

r inf

rast

ruct

ure

inve

stm

ent

deve

lope

d an

d te

sted

(equ

ipm

ent

com

mis

sion

ed/f

ully

ope

ratio

nal)

Tech

nolo

gy o

r inf

rast

ruct

ure

inve

stm

ent f

ully

im

plem

ente

d to

the

scal

e pr

opos

edTe

chno

logy

or i

nfra

stru

ctur

e in

vest

men

t ap

prop

riate

ly in

corp

orat

es th

e ne

eds

of

both

fem

ales

and

mal

es in

to it

s de

sign

and

im

plem

enta

tion

Tech

nolo

gy o

r inf

rast

ruct

ure

inve

stm

ent

inco

rpor

ates

the

need

s of

4-5

vul

nera

ble

popu

latio

ns in

to it

s de

sign

and

impl

emen

tatio

n

Annex

4E

XA

MP

LE

OF

SC

OR

ING

CR

ITE

RIA

FO

R C

OR

E IN

DIC

ATO

R 3

QUAL

ITY

AND

EXTE

NT T

O W

HICH

CLI

MAT

E RE

SPON

SIVE

INST

RUM

ENTS

/INVE

STM

ENT

MOD

ELS

ARE

DEVE

LOPE

D AN

D TE

STED

| 62 |


PPCR

SCO

RECA

RD 1

DATE

OF

REPO

RT:

JUNE

30,

201

7

PPCR

COR

E IN

DICA

TOR

1: D

EGRE

E OF

INTE

GRAT

ION

OF C

LIM

ATE

CHAN

GE IN

TO N

ATIO

NAL

PLAN

NING

DATA

COL

LECT

ION

MET

HOD:

DAT

A SC

ORED

AT

THE

COUN

TRY

LEVE

L

SAIN

T VI

NCEN

T AN

D TH

E GR

ENAD

INES

PPCR

INVE

STM

ENT

PLAN

REPO

RTIN

G PE

RIOD

:Fr

om: J

anua

ry 1,

201

6Co

ver s

heet

To

: De

cem

ber 3

1, 20

16

Com

plet

e be

low

the

sect

ors

iden

tifie

d as

a p

riorit

y in

the

PPCR

inve

stm

ent

plan

. In

sert

oth

er p

riorit

y se

ctor

s or

m

inis

trie

s be

low

(opt

iona

l)

Is th

ere

an a

ppro

ved

clim

ate

chan

ge p

lan

for t

he n

atio

n/

sect

or?

Have

clim

ate

resi

lienc

e st

rate

gies

bee

n em

bedd

ed

in th

e ce

ntra

l gov

ernm

ent’s

/ se

ctor

’s pr

inci

pal p

lann

ing

docu

men

ts?

Has

resp

onsi

bilit

y be

en

assi

gned

to in

stitu

tions

or

pers

ons

to in

tegr

ate

clim

ate

resi

lienc

e pl

anni

ng?

Have

spe

cific

mea

sure

s to

ad

dres

s cl

imat

e re

silie

nce

been

iden

tifie

d an

d pr

iorit

ized

? e.

g. in

vest

men

ts

and

prog

ram

s

Do a

ll pl

anni

ng p

roce

sses

ro

utin

ely

scre

en fo

r clim

ate

risks

?

AB

CD

EF

SCOR

E-20

15 R

EPOR

TING

PER

IOD

(L

AST

YEAR

)

SCOR

E-20

15

REPO

RTIN

G PE

RIOD

(LAS

T YE

AR)

SCOR

E-20

16

REPO

RTIN

G PE

RIOD

(NEW

)

SCOR

E-20

15

REPO

RTIN

G PE

RIOD

(LAS

T YE

AR)

SCOR

E-20

16

REPO

RTIN

G PE

RIOD

(NEW

)

SCOR

E-20

15

REPO

RTIN

G PE

RIOD

(LAS

T YE

AR)

SCOR

E-20

16

REPO

RTIN

G PE

RIOD

(NEW

)

SCOR

E-20

15

REPO

RTIN

G PE

RIOD

(LAS

T YE

AR)

SCOR

E-20

16

REPO

RTIN

G PE

RIOD

(NEW

)

SCOR

E-20

15

REPO

RTIN

G PE

RIOD

(LAS

T YE

AR)

SCOR

E-20

16

REPO

RTIN

G PE

RIOD

(NEW

)

NATI

ONAL

PLA

NNIN

G5

58

88

89

94

5

How

do

you

just

ify th

e in

crea

se (o

r de

crea

se) i

n sc

ores

bet

wee

n sc

ores

re

port

ed in

the

2015

repo

rtin

g pe

riod

and

scor

es re

port

ed in

the

2016

repo

rtin

g pe

riod?

Ple

ase

expl

ain!

Scor

e ha

s no

t cha

nged

. A d

raft

cl

imat

e ch

ange

pla

n ex

ists

but

th

ere

are

conc

rete

pla

ns to

de

velo

p a

Clim

ate

Chan

ge P

olic

y an

d Im

plem

enta

tion

Stra

tegy

w

ith fi

nanc

ing

from

the

RDVR

P. Te

chni

cal a

ssis

tanc

e w

ill b

e pr

ocur

ed b

y th

ird q

uart

er 2

017

to th

is e

nd. A

dditi

onal

ly, t

he

Natio

nal E

cono

mic

and

Soc

ial

Deve

lopm

ent P

lan

(NES

DP)

lays

out

the

polic

y on

clim

ate

resi

lienc

e in

Goa

l 4 o

f its

5-g

oal

plan

.

No c

hang

e in

sco

re. N

atio

nal

Econ

omic

and

Soc

ial

Deve

lopm

ent P

lan

outli

nes

polic

y di

rect

ion

on c

limat

e re

silie

nce.

Ot

her p

lann

ing

docu

men

ts th

at

exis

t/ a

re b

eing

impl

emen

t in

clud

e th

e En

ergy

Pol

icy

and

Actio

n Pl

an. O

ther

pla

nnin

g do

cum

ent t

o be

dev

elop

ed

whi

ch w

ill o

utlin

e sp

ecifi

c cl

imat

e re

silie

nce

stra

tegi

es.

Thes

e in

clud

e Na

tiona

l Phy

sica

l De

velo

pmen

t Pla

n; N

atio

nal

Appr

opria

te M

itiga

tion

Actio

n fo

r th

e En

ergy

and

Tra

nspo

rtat

ion

Sect

or a

nd th

e Na

tiona

l Ad

apta

tion

Plan

.

Resp

onsi

bilit

y ha

s be

en a

ssig

ned

to th

e Su

stai

nabl

e De

velo

pmen

t Un

it in

the

Min

istr

y of

Eco

nom

ic

Plan

ning

to e

nsur

e m

ore

coor

dina

ted

clim

ate

chan

ge

plan

ning

. Thi

s m

inis

try

was

cr

eate

d in

201

5 in

acc

orda

nce

with

gov

ernm

ent p

riorit

ies

in

mai

nstr

eam

ing

clim

ate

chan

ge.

Wor

k is

ong

oing

on

spec

ific

inve

stm

ent p

rogr

ams

such

as

the

SPCR

/RDV

RP, J

-CCC

P an

d GC

CA w

hich

prio

ritie

s pl

anni

ng

inst

rum

ents

, inf

rast

ruct

ure

inve

stm

ents

and

the

pilo

ting

of

adap

tatio

n te

chno

logi

es. L

ess

wor

k is

ong

oing

in th

e ar

ea o

f da

ta c

olle

ctio

n.

No s

cree

ning

mec

hani

sms

curr

ently

in p

lace

for p

lann

ing

proc

esse

s. Ov

er 2

5 go

vern

men

t of

ficia

ls re

ceiv

ed tr

aini

ng

in C

CORA

L sc

reen

ing

tool

in

2016

. The

scr

eeni

ng to

ol w

as

deve

lope

d un

der t

he d

irect

ion

of C

arib

bean

Clim

ate

Com

mun

ity

Clim

ate

Chan

ge C

entr

e (C

CCCC

) sp

ecifi

cally

for u

se b

y Ca

ribbe

an

gove

rnm

ent o

ffici

als

and

polic

ymak

ers.

A se

cond

pha

se

of th

e CC

ORAL

trai

ning

will

take

pl

ace

2017

with

sen

sitiz

atio

n.

The

tool

con

tain

s an

onl

ine

quic

k sc

reen

ing

chec

klis

t tai

lore

d to

Ca

ribbe

an c

onte

xt a

nd o

utlin

e fo

r ris

k m

anag

emen

t.

>>

Annex

5E

XA

MP

LE

OF

SC

OR

ECA

RD

1 FO

R C

OR

E IN

DIC

ATO

R 1

ANNEXES

COAS

TAL

AND

MAR

INE

RESO

URCE

S/CO

ASTA

L ZO

NE M

ANAG

EMEN

T4

54

46

68

85

5

How

do

you

just

ify th

e in

crea

se (o

r de

crea

se) i

n sc

ores

bet

wee

n sc

ores

repo

rted

in

the

2015

repo

rtin

g pe

riod

and

scor

es

repo

rted

in th

e 20

16 re

port

ing

perio

d?

Plea

se e

xpla

in!

No c

oast

al z

one

man

agem

ent

plan

dev

elop

ed fo

r the

sec

tor.

Seve

ral s

tudi

es h

ave

been

co

mpl

eted

on

sect

ions

of t

he

coas

t rec

omm

endi

ng th

at d

ata

be c

olle

cted

bef

ore

proc

eedi

ng

to a

n IC

ZM. T

he R

DVRP

is

curr

ently

neg

otia

ting

purc

hase

an

d de

ploy

men

t of e

quip

men

t to

col

lect

wav

e an

d cu

rren

t dat

a in

SPC

R pi

lot a

reas

. An

OECS

Co

asta

l Zon

e M

anag

emen

t Pol

icy

has

been

com

plet

ed b

ut h

as n

ot

yet b

een

adop

ted

by S

VG.

No c

oast

al z

one

man

agem

ent

plan

for t

he s

ecto

r. An

OEC

S Co

asta

l Zon

e M

anag

emen

t Po

licy

has

been

dra

fted

but

no

t ado

pted

in S

VG. C

oast

al

inte

rven

tions

are

impl

emen

ted

on a

pro

ject

by

proj

ect b

asis

. Se

vera

l stu

dies

hav

e be

en

com

plet

ed o

n se

ctio

ns o

f the

co

ast w

ith re

com

men

datio

ns fo

r in

terv

entio

ns, b

ut n

o in

tegr

ated

pl

an d

evel

oped

.

The

Min

istr

y of

Tra

nspo

rt

and

Wor

ks h

as b

een

assi

gned

re

spon

sibi

lity

for C

oast

al Z

one

man

agem

ent.

Coas

tal i

nter

vent

ions

hav

e be

en

prio

ritiz

ed a

nd a

re o

ngoi

ng

in S

andy

Bay

, San

Sou

ci,

Geor

geto

wn,

Dar

k Vi

ew

Lim

ited

capa

city

in th

is s

ecto

r. Sc

reen

ing

only

impl

emen

ted

whe

re re

quire

d by

ext

erna

l en

titie

s. Of

ficia

ls re

ceiv

ed

trai

ning

in C

CORA

L on

line

scre

enin

g to

ol in

201

6.

Sens

itiza

tion

for t

his

tool

will

be

cond

ucte

d in

201

7.

AGRI

CULT

URE

AND

FORE

STRY

35

35

56

88

22

How

do

you

just

ify th

e in

crea

se (o

r de

crea

se) i

n sc

ores

bet

wee

n sc

ores

repo

rted

in

the

2015

repo

rtin

g pe

riod

and

scor

es

repo

rted

in th

e 20

16 re

port

ing

perio

d?

Plea

se e

xpla

in!

Draf

t Agr

icul

ture

Dis

aste

r Ri

sk M

anag

emen

t Pla

n co

mpl

eted

in 2

016

with

fund

ing

from

FAO.

The

pla

n is

bei

ng

revi

ewed

by

the

Min

istr

y of

Ag

ricul

ture

. Agr

icul

ture

and

Fi

sher

ies

Deve

lopm

ent P

lan

also

com

plet

ed in

201

5 w

ith

assi

stan

ce fr

om C

ARIC

OM u

nder

th

e 10

th E

DF. C

limat

e ch

ange

has

be

en in

clud

ed a

s cr

oss-

cutt

ing

them

e.

Clim

ate

resi

lienc

e st

rate

gies

em

bedd

ed in

bot

h do

cum

ents

in

draf

t for

m.

Resp

onsi

bilit

y as

sign

ed w

ithin

th

e se

ctor

. The

re a

re fo

cal p

oint

s on

clim

ate

chan

ge in

agr

icul

tura

l ex

tens

ion,

agr

icul

ture

and

fis

herie

s.

A nu

mbe

r of p

roje

cts

are

ongo

ing

aim

ed a

t reh

abili

tatio

n,

resi

lienc

e an

d im

plem

entin

g in

nova

tive

adap

tatio

n. T

hese

in

clud

e re

fore

stat

ion

and

reha

bilit

ativ

e w

orks

in tw

o m

ajor

w

ater

shed

s.

Lim

ited

scre

enin

g im

plem

ente

d in

this

sec

tor

LAND

MAN

AGEM

ENT

33

45

89

88

59

How

do

you

just

ify th

e in

crea

se (o

r de

crea

se) i

n sc

ores

bet

wee

n sc

ores

re

port

ed in

the

2015

repo

rtin

g pe

riod

and

scor

es re

port

ed in

the

2016

repo

rtin

g pe

riod?

Ple

ase

expl

ain!

Wor

k on

goin

g to

war

d th

e de

velo

pmen

t of a

Nat

iona

l Ph

ysic

al D

evel

opm

ent P

lan.

Dr

aft l

ocal

are

a pl

ans

have

bee

n de

velo

ped

for S

PCR

pilo

t are

as

(Uni

on Is

land

, Geo

rget

own,

Arn

os

Vale

).

The

OECS

Bui

ldin

g co

des

revi

sed

in 2

015

spec

ifica

lly a

ddre

ss

stan

dard

s fo

r res

ilien

ce a

nd

regu

latio

ns to

redu

ce ri

sk to

di

sast

er (h

urric

anes

and

floo

ds).

Resp

onsi

bilit

y as

sign

ed w

ithin

th

e se

ctor

for m

atte

rs o

n cl

imat

e ch

ange

Sc

reen

ing

tool

s de

velo

ped

for

this

sec

tor a

nd a

re u

sed.

DISA

STER

MAN

AGEM

ENT

85

87

89

87

55

How

do

you

just

ify th

e in

crea

se (o

r de

crea

se) i

n sc

ores

bet

wee

n sc

ores

re

port

ed in

the

2015

repo

rtin

g pe

riod

and

scor

es re

port

ed in

the

2016

repo

rtin

g pe

riod?

Ple

ase

expl

ain!

Com

preh

ensi

ve D

isas

ter

Man

agem

ent P

olic

y an

d St

rate

gy d

raft

ed a

nd s

ubm

itted

to

Cab

inet

(201

5). T

he p

olic

y ne

ed to

be

upda

ted

(to in

clud

e co

nsid

erat

ions

for S

usta

inab

le

Deve

lopm

ent G

oals

and

Sen

dai

Fram

ewor

k) a

nd re

-sub

mitt

ed.

Clim

ate

resi

lienc

e st

rate

gies

em

bedd

ed in

oth

er p

lann

ing

docu

men

ts e

.g. i

nclu

de 5

-yea

r w

ork

prog

ram

mes

.

NEM

O ha

s in

crea

sed

staf

f ca

paci

ty in

clud

ing

a Ra

dio

Com

mun

icat

ions

Offi

cer t

o su

ppor

t the

inst

alla

tion

and

oper

atio

n of

the

Emer

genc

y Co

mm

unic

atio

n Ne

twor

k.

Inve

stm

ents

and

pro

gram

mes

ha

ve b

een

prio

ritis

ed a

nd

are

bein

g pu

rsue

d. T

hese

in

clud

e co

nstr

uctio

n sa

telli

te

war

ehou

ses,

reha

bilit

atio

n of

em

erge

ncy

shel

ters

and

de

velo

pmen

t of s

helte

r m

anag

emen

t pol

icy.

Scre

enin

g to

ols

used

in th

is

sect

or in

clud

e a

chec

klis

t for

Hu

rric

ane

shel

ters

.

>>

| 64 |


INST

RUCT

IONS

: 1.

Plea

se e

stab

lish

scor

ing

crite

ria fo

r eac

h of

the

aspe

cts

of th

is s

core

card

and

sub

mit

them

with

you

r rep

ort.

This

sho

uld

be d

one

once

, pre

fera

bly

at b

asel

ine

stag

e an

d us

ed d

urin

g su

bseq

uent

repo

rtin

g ye

ars.

2.

If y

ou h

ave

prev

ious

ly e

stab

lishe

d yo

ur s

corin

g cr

iteria

, use

them

and

sub

mit

them

with

you

r rep

ort.

3. S

core

eac

h ce

ll w

ith a

sco

re b

etw

een

0 an

d 10

(ref

er to

you

r sco

ring

crite

ria d

efin

ed fo

r thi

s sc

orec

ard)

4.

Pro

vide

exp

lana

tion

of c

hang

e in

sco

res

betw

een

2015

and

201

6 in

app

ropr

iate

cel

ls a

nd a

void

abb

revi

atio

ns.

GEND

ER M

AINS

TREA

MIN

GTo

wha

t ext

ent a

nd in

wha

t way

s ha

ve g

ende

r and

soc

ioec

onom

ic v

ulne

rabi

lity

conc

erns

bee

n m

ains

trea

med

with

the

clim

ate

resi

lienc

e pl

anni

ng p

roce

sses

at n

atio

nal a

nd s

ecto

r le

vels

?

(e.g

., th

roug

h ge

nder

bud

getin

g ap

proa

ches

, gen

der n

eeds

ass

essm

ents

and

con

sulta

tions

, or s

imila

r, in

clud

ing

coor

dina

tion

with

the

Min

istr

y of

Wom

en’s

Affa

irs, w

omen

’s or

gani

zatio

ns)

LESS

ONS

LEAR

NED

Wha

t hav

e be

en th

e ke

y su

cces

ses

whe

n in

tegr

atin

g cl

imat

e ch

ange

in n

atio

nal,

incl

udin

g se

ctor

pla

nnin

g?

Key

succ

esse

s in

201

6 ha

ve b

een

the

syne

rgie

s cr

eate

d am

ong

proj

ects

aim

ed a

t clim

ate

resi

lienc

e pr

ojec

ts R

DVRP

, JCC

CP, O

ECS

GCCA

. Bot

h th

e OE

CS G

loba

l Clim

ate

Chan

ge A

llian

ce a

nd

the

RDVR

P ha

ve p

oole

d th

eir r

esou

rces

tow

ards

har

mon

izat

ion

of b

uild

ing

code

s in

the

OECS

and

impl

emen

tatio

n in

St.

Vinc

ent a

nd th

e Gr

enad

ines

.

Sim

ilar s

yner

gies

are

exp

ecte

d be

twee

n th

e Na

tiona

l Ada

ptat

ion

Plan

pro

cess

es a

nd th

e de

velo

pmen

t of a

Nat

iona

l Clim

ate

Chan

ge P

olic

y an

d Im

plem

enta

tion

Plan

, bei

ng p

ursu

ed u

nder

tw

o pr

ojec

ts. B

oth

plan

s ha

ve a

s th

eir o

bjec

tive

the

deve

lopm

ent o

f a c

oord

inat

ion

mec

hani

sm fo

r clim

ate

chan

ge.

This

dev

elop

men

t is

part

icul

arly

enc

oura

ging

to th

e PP

CR.

Wha

t hav

e be

en th

e ke

y ch

alle

nges

and

wha

t opp

ortu

nitie

s fo

r im

prov

emen

t do

you

see?

One

chal

leng

e di

scus

sed

at th

e PP

CR s

corin

g w

orks

hop

is la

ck o

f suf

ficie

nt c

onsu

ltatio

n on

som

e cl

imat

e ch

ange

pro

ject

with

the

com

mun

ity a

s w

ell a

s w

ith k

ey e

xper

t and

age

ncie

s. St

akeh

olde

rs e

mph

asiz

e th

at th

e de

part

men

t with

the

resp

onsi

bilit

y fo

r clim

ate

chan

ge is

oft

en e

xclu

ded

from

con

sulta

tions

on

proj

ects

add

ress

ing

clim

ate

resi

lienc

e.

SHAR

ING

EXPE

RIEN

CES

Plea

se le

t us

have

som

e in

sigh

ts in

to th

e pa

rtic

ular

exp

erie

nce

of y

our c

ount

ry w

ith in

tegr

atin

g cl

imat

e ch

ange

in n

atio

nal,

in

clud

ing

sect

or, p

lann

ing.

Sour

ce: S

aint

Vin

cent

and

the

Gren

adin

es 2

016

Resu

lts R

epor

ts

>> PPCR

SCO

RECA

RD 1

(CON

TINU

ED)

ANNEXES

| 65 |

INST

RUCT

IONS

: 1.

Plea

se e

stab

lish

scor

ing

crite

ria fo

r eac

h of

the

aspe

cts

of th

is s

core

card

and

sub

mit

them

with

you

r rep

ort.

This

sho

uld

be d

one

once

, pre

fera

bly

at b

asel

ine

stag

e an

d us

ed d

urin

g su

bseq

uent

repo

rtin

g ye

ars.

2.

If y

ou h

ave

prev

ious

ly e

stab

lishe

d yo

ur s

corin

g cr

iteria

, use

them

and

sub

mit

them

with

you

r rep

ort.

3. S

core

eac

h ce

ll w

ith a

sco

re b

etw

een

0 an

d 10

(ref

er to

you

r sco

ring

crite

ria d

efin

ed fo

r thi

s sc

orec

ard)

4.

Pro

vide

exp

lana

tion

of c

hang

e in

sco

res

betw

een

2015

and

201

6 in

app

ropr

iate

cel

ls a

nd a

void

abb

revi

atio

ns.

GEND

ER M

AINS

TREA

MIN

GTo

wha

t ext

ent a

nd in

wha

t way

s ha

ve g

ende

r and

soc

ioec

onom

ic v

ulne

rabi

lity

conc

erns

bee

n m

ains

trea

med

with

the

clim

ate

resi

lienc

e pl

anni

ng p

roce

sses

at n

atio

nal a

nd s

ecto

r le

vels

?

(e.g

., th

roug

h ge

nder

bud

getin

g ap

proa

ches

, gen

der n

eeds

ass

essm

ents

and

con

sulta

tions

, or s

imila

r, in

clud

ing

coor

dina

tion

with

the

Min

istr

y of

Wom

en’s

Affa

irs, w

omen

’s or

gani

zatio

ns)

LESS

ONS

LEAR

NED

Wha

t hav

e be

en th

e ke

y su

cces

ses

whe

n in

tegr

atin

g cl

imat

e ch

ange

in n

atio

nal,

incl

udin

g se

ctor

pla

nnin

g?

Key

succ

esse

s in

201

6 ha

ve b

een

the

syne

rgie

s cr

eate

d am

ong

proj

ects

aim

ed a

t clim

ate

resi

lienc

e pr

ojec

ts R

DVRP

, JCC

CP, O

ECS

GCCA

. Bot

h th

e OE

CS G

loba

l Clim

ate

Chan

ge A

llian

ce a

nd

the

RDVR

P ha

ve p

oole

d th

eir r

esou

rces

tow

ards

har

mon

izat

ion

of b

uild

ing

code

s in

the

OECS

and

impl

emen

tatio

n in

St.

Vinc

ent a

nd th

e Gr

enad

ines

.

Sim

ilar s

yner

gies

are

exp

ecte

d be

twee

n th

e Na

tiona

l Ada

ptat

ion

Plan

pro

cess

es a

nd th

e de

velo

pmen

t of a

Nat

iona

l Clim

ate

Chan

ge P

olic

y an

d Im

plem

enta

tion

Plan

, bei

ng p

ursu

ed u

nder

tw

o pr

ojec

ts. B

oth

plan

s ha

ve a

s th

eir o

bjec

tive

the

deve

lopm

ent o

f a c

oord

inat

ion

mec

hani

sm fo

r clim

ate

chan

ge.

This

dev

elop

men

t is

part

icul

arly

enc

oura

ging

to th

e PP

CR.

Wha

t hav

e be

en th

e ke

y ch

alle

nges

and

wha

t opp

ortu

nitie

s fo

r im

prov

emen

t do

you

see?

One

chal

leng

e di

scus

sed

at th

e PP

CR s

corin

g w

orks

hop

is la

ck o

f suf

ficie

nt c

onsu

ltatio

n on

som

e cl

imat

e ch

ange

pro

ject

with

the

com

mun

ity a

s w

ell a

s w

ith k

ey e

xper

t and

age

ncie

s. St

akeh

olde

rs e

mph

asiz

e th

at th

e de

part

men

t with

the

resp

onsi

bilit

y fo

r clim

ate

chan

ge is

oft

en e

xclu

ded

from

con

sulta

tions

on

proj

ects

add

ress

ing

clim

ate

resi

lienc

e.

SHAR

ING

EXPE

RIEN

CES

Plea

se le

t us

have

som

e in

sigh

ts in

to th

e pa

rtic

ular

exp

erie

nce

of y

our c

ount

ry w

ith in

tegr

atin

g cl

imat

e ch

ange

in n

atio

nal,

in

clud

ing

sect

or, p

lann

ing.

Sour

ce: S

aint

Vin

cent

and

the

Gren

adin

es 2

016

Resu

lts R

epor

ts

PPCR

SCO

RECA

RD 2

DATE

OF

REPO

RT:

MM

/DD/

YY

PPCR

COR

E IN

DICA

TOR

2: E

VIDE

NCE

OF S

TREN

GTHE

NED

GOVE

RNM

ENT

CAPA

CITY

AND

COO

RDIN

ATIO

N M

ECHA

NISM

TO

MAI

NSTR

EAM

CLI

MAT

E RE

SILI

ENCE

DATA

COL

LECT

ION

MET

HOD:

DAT

A SC

ORED

AT

THE

COUN

TRY

LEVE

L

TAJI

KIST

ANPP

CR IN

VEST

MEN

T PL

AN

REPO

RTIN

G PE

RIOD

:Fr

om: J

anua

ry 1,

201

6To

: De

cem

ber 3

1, 20

16

GOVE

RNM

ENT

CAPA

CITY

Co

mpl

ete

belo

w th

e se

ctor

s id

entif

ied

as a

prio

rity

in th

e PP

CR in

vest

men

t pl

an. I

nser

t oth

er p

riorit

y se

ctor

s or

m

inis

trie

s be

low

(opt

iona

l).

Are

info

rmat

ion,

stu

dies

, and

as

sess

men

ts a

ddre

ssin

g cl

imat

e ch

ange

, var

iabi

lity,

and

resi

lienc

e av

aila

ble?

Is th

e ne

cess

ary

clim

ate

chan

ge

expe

rtis

e av

aila

ble?

Do

nat

iona

l/sec

tor i

ncen

tives

an

d le

gisl

ativ

e po

licie

s ex

pres

sly

addr

ess

clim

ate

chan

ge a

nd

resi

lienc

e?

Does

the

gove

rnm

ent/s

ecto

r pa

rtic

ipat

e in

the

coor

dina

tion

mec

hani

sm?

AB

CD

E

SCOR

E- 2

015

REPO

RTIN

G PE

RIOD

(LAS

T YE

AR)

SCOR

E-20

16

REPO

RTIN

G PE

RIOD

(NEW

)

SCOR

E- 2

015

REPO

RTIN

G PE

RIOD

(LAS

T YE

AR)

SCOR

E-20

16

REPO

RTIN

G PE

RIOD

(NEW

)

SCOR

E- 2

015

REPO

RTIN

G PE

RIOD

(LAS

T YE

AR)

SCOR

E-20

16

REPO

RTIN

G PE

RIOD

(NEW

)

SCOR

E- 2

015

REPO

RTIN

G PE

RIOD

(LAS

T YE

AR)

SCOR

E-20

16

REPO

RTIN

G PE

RIOD

(NEW

)

TAJI

KIST

AN G

OVER

NMEN

T5

64

52

35

6

How

do

you

just

ify th

e in

crea

se (o

r de

crea

se) i

n sc

ores

bet

wee

n sc

ores

re

port

ed in

201

5 re

port

ing

perio

d an

d sc

ores

repo

rted

in 2

016

repo

rtin

g pe

riod?

Pl

ease

exp

lain

!

In 2

016,

the

Regi

onal

Env

ironm

enta

l Ce

ntre

for C

entr

al A

sia

(CAR

EC) i

n co

oper

atio

n w

ith th

e Co

mm

ittee

fo

r Env

ironm

enta

l Pro

tect

ion

of

Tajik

ista

n co

nduc

ted

a st

udy

on

mig

ratio

n, re

mitt

ance

s an

d cl

imat

e re

silie

nce

in a

rid a

nd s

emi-a

rid a

reas

of

Taj

ikis

tan.

In M

arch

201

6, u

nder

the

proj

ect T

A-80

90: B

uild

ing

Capa

city

for

Clim

ate

Resi

lienc

e in

Taj

ikis

tan,

the

NGO

- Kuh

isto

n Fo

unda

tion

prep

ared

a

repo

rt ‘A

sses

smen

t of c

limat

e ch

ange

aw

aren

ess

amon

g th

e po

pula

tion

in s

elec

ted

area

s of

the

Repu

blic

of

Tajik

ista

n’. W

ithin

this

pro

ject

a re

sear

ch

was

con

duct

ed in

col

labo

ratio

n w

ith th

e NG

O ‘Y

outh

the

Ecol

ogic

al C

entr

e’ o

n cl

imat

e ch

ange

vul

nera

bilit

y as

sess

men

t in

five

vul

nera

ble

pilo

t are

as, i

n or

der t

o de

velo

p Lo

cal a

dapt

atio

n pl

ans.

In 2

016,

mor

e th

an 2

00 s

peci

alis

ts

atte

nded

trai

ning

sem

inar

s su

ppor

ted

by th

e CD

TA p

roje

ct a

t the

trai

ning

ce

nter

s of

the

five

pilo

t dis

tric

ts a

nd

in th

e ci

ty o

f Dus

hanb

e. M

ore

than

10

0 sp

ecia

lists

repr

esen

ting

cent

ral

gove

rnm

ent m

inis

trie

s an

d de

part

men

ts

atte

nded

trai

ning

cou

rses

org

aniz

ed

by U

NDP,

GIZ

and

othe

r int

erna

tiona

l or

gani

zatio

ns in

Taj

ikis

tan

whi

le m

ore

than

30

peop

le a

tten

ded

trai

ning

co

urse

s in

oth

er c

ount

ries.

On a

vera

ge,

20 p

eopl

e at

the

gove

rnm

ent l

evel

hav

e pr

ofes

sion

al s

kills

dire

ctly

link

ed to

cl

imat

e ch

ange

.

In th

e Na

tiona

l Dev

elop

men

t Str

ateg

y fo

r the

per

iod

up to

203

0 an

d th

e M

ediu

m-te

rm D

evel

opm

ent P

rogr

am u

p to

202

0 ad

opte

d by

the

Gove

rnm

ent o

f Ta

jikis

tan

in 2

016,

a k

ey c

halle

nge

for

impl

emen

ting

adap

tatio

n to

clim

ate

chan

ge w

as th

e le

gal f

ram

ewor

k an

d m

anag

emen

t mec

hani

sms.

Base

d on

th

is, a

task

was

set

up

to im

prov

e th

e le

gal f

ram

ewor

k on

clim

ate

chan

ge

adap

tatio

n, b

oth

at th

e na

tiona

l and

se

ctor

ial l

evel

. As

in p

revi

ous

year

s, th

e cl

imat

e ch

ange

issu

es a

re p

artia

lly

addr

esse

d in

the

law

s: “

On E

nerg

y”, “

On

Tran

spor

t”, “

On E

colo

gica

l Exp

ertis

e”,

“On

Envi

ronm

enta

l Pro

tect

ion”

, “On

En

viro

nmen

tal E

duca

tion”

, “On

the

use

of re

new

able

ene

rgy

sour

ces”

and

“On

en

ergy

effi

cien

cy”.

The

gove

rnm

ent p

artic

ipat

ion

in

the

coor

dina

tion

mec

hani

sm h

as

not c

hang

ed c

ompa

red

to p

revi

ous

repo

rtin

g ye

ars.

The

Depu

ty P

rime

Min

iste

r is

the

chai

rman

of t

he

coor

dina

tion

mec

hani

sm. T

he s

truc

ture

of

the

coor

dina

tion

mec

hani

sm

invo

lves

repr

esen

tativ

es o

f key

m

inis

trie

s, re

sear

ch c

ente

rs a

nd p

ublic

or

gani

zatio

ns. H

ead

of th

e De

part

men

t of

Agr

icul

ture

and

Env

ironm

ent o

f the

Ex

ecut

ive

Offic

e of

the

Pres

iden

t of t

he

Repu

blic

of T

ajik

ista

n is

the

coor

dina

tor

of th

e PP

CR. T

he c

oord

inat

ion

of

the

PPCR

act

iviti

es is

led

by th

e PP

CR S

ecre

taria

t. Th

e Co

mm

ittee

for

Envi

ronm

enta

l Pro

tect

ion

(COE

P) is

the

Gove

rnm

ent o

f Taj

ikis

tan’

s Au

thor

ized

Bo

dy fo

r the

Gre

en C

limat

e Fu

nd. >>

Annex

6E

XA

MP

LE

OF

SC

OR

ECA

RD

2 F

OR

CO

RE

IND

ICA

TOR

2


AGRI

CULT

URE

45

45

35

35

How

do

you

just

ify th

e in

crea

se (o

r de

crea

se) i

n sc

ores

bet

wee

n sc

ores

re

port

ed in

201

5 re

port

ing

perio

d a

nd

scor

es re

port

ed in

201

6 re

port

ing

perio

d?

Plea

se e

xpla

in!

Empl

oyee

s of

the

Inst

itute

of l

and

of

Tajik

ista

n de

velo

ped

a m

etho

dolo

gy

for s

tudy

ing

agro

-bio

dive

rsity

and

ad

apta

tion

pote

ntia

l in

the

mou

ntai

nous

ar

eas

of T

ajik

ista

n ta

king

into

acc

ount

th

e cl

imat

e ch

ange

con

text

. The

re

sear

ch a

ims

to fo

cus

on fa

rmin

g ap

proa

ches

use

d by

exp

erie

nced

fa

rmer

s an

d in

habi

tant

s of

rura

l are

as,

who

hav

e tr

aditi

onal

kno

wle

dge

and

skill

s in

farm

ing,

thus

con

trib

utin

g to

th

e pr

eser

vatio

n of

trad

ition

al v

arie

ties

of fr

uit a

nd fi

eld

crop

s, sp

ecie

s of

farm

an

imal

s an

d bi

rds.

In 2

016,

rura

l spe

cial

ists

par

ticip

ated

in

the

follo

win

g se

min

ars:

• R

egio

nal W

orks

hop

on P

astu

re U

se in

Cl

imat

e Ch

ange

, org

aniz

ed b

y FA

O in

Bi

shke

k (K

yrgy

zsta

n) (2

peo

ple)

; • R

egio

nal c

onfe

renc

e on

clim

ate

chan

ge in

the

city

of A

lma-

Ata,

or

gani

zed

by G

IZ (2

peo

ple)

: • I

nter

natio

nal s

emin

ar o

n fo

od s

ecur

ity

taki

ng in

to a

ccou

nt c

limat

e ch

ange

in

Ank

ara-

Turk

ey o

rgan

ized

by

FAO

(2

peop

le).

Mor

e th

an 2

0 pr

ofes

sion

als

have

exp

erie

nce

in p

roje

cts

rela

ted

to c

limat

e ch

ange

. The

wor

k of

the

Acad

emy

of A

gric

ultu

ral S

cien

ces

is

dire

ctly

rela

ted

to a

dapt

atio

n, a

s it

cond

ucts

rese

arch

on

cott

on c

rops

, w

heat

, bar

ley

and

legu

mes

, inc

ludi

ng

wor

k on

intr

oduc

tion

of h

igh-

yiel

ding

va

rietie

s.

In e

arly

201

6, a

men

dmen

ts a

nd

supp

lem

ents

wer

e m

ade

to a

gric

ultu

ral

taki

ng in

to c

onsi

dera

tion

clim

ate

chan

ge is

sues

. The

se la

ws

incl

ude

in

the

taw

s of

the

Repu

blic

of T

ajik

ista

n “O

n Se

ed”

and

“On

past

ures

”. In

201

6,

addi

tiona

l cha

nges

wer

e m

ade

in th

e La

ws

of th

e Re

publ

ic o

f Taj

ikis

tan

“On

Seed

” an

d “O

n Pa

stur

es”

taki

ng in

to

acco

unt c

limat

e im

pact

s.

In o

rder

to im

plem

ent t

he P

rogr

am o

n re

form

ing

Agric

ultu

re s

ecto

r of t

he

Repu

blic

of T

ajik

ista

n fo

r 201

2 - 2

020

year

s, th

e M

inis

try

of A

gric

ultu

re

esta

blis

hed

a te

chni

cal w

orki

ng g

roup

w

ith re

pres

enta

tives

from

key

min

istr

ies

and

depa

rtm

ents

. Rep

rese

ntat

ives

of

the

Min

istr

y of

Agr

icul

ture

are

m

embe

rs o

f PPC

R te

chni

cal w

orki

ng

grou

p an

d th

e Gr

een

Clim

ate

Fund

. In

2016

, the

tech

nica

l wor

king

gro

up o

f PP

CR in

clud

ed th

e he

ad o

f the

sta

te

plan

t pro

tect

ion

and

cler

ical

izat

ion

of a

gric

ultu

re d

epar

tmen

t and

the

prof

esso

r of t

he A

grar

ian

Univ

ersi

ty,

head

of t

he p

lant

man

agem

ent

depa

rtm

ent.

WAT

ER R

ESOU

RCES

/IRR

IGAT

ION

46

34

23

44

How

do

you

just

ify th

e in

crea

se (o

r de

crea

se) i

n sc

ores

bet

wee

n sc

ores

re

port

ed in

201

5 re

port

ing

perio

d a

nd

scor

es re

port

ed in

201

6 re

port

ing

perio

d?

Plea

se e

xpla

in!

In S

epte

mbe

r 201

6, w

ith s

uppo

rt fr

om

the

Wor

ld B

ank,

a re

port

ent

itled

“So

cial

As

sess

men

t of Z

eraf

shan

Riv

er B

asin

M

anag

emen

t and

irrig

atio

n sy

stem

re

habi

litat

ion”

was

pre

pare

d. T

he

aim

of t

he s

ocia

l ass

essm

ent w

as to

as

sess

soc

io-e

cono

mic

con

ditio

ns o

f pr

ojec

t are

as in

term

s of

food

sec

urity

, irr

igat

ion

and

drai

nage

sys

tem

s, as

wel

l as

clim

ate

chan

ge im

pact

s on

wat

er

reso

urce

s of

Zer

afsh

an V

alle

y.

In 2

016,

mor

e th

an 14

spe

cial

ists

pa

rtic

ipat

ed in

wor

ksho

ps, c

onfe

renc

es

rela

ted

to w

ater

reso

urce

s in

the

cont

ext o

f clim

ate

chan

ge, w

hich

took

pl

ace

in C

entr

al A

sia

with

sup

port

fr

om th

e CA

REC,

GIZ

, UND

P an

d ot

her i

nter

natio

nal o

rgan

izat

ions

. Tw

o sp

ecia

lists

com

plet

ed M

aste

r’s

prog

ram

in J

apan

with

the

supp

ort

of J

ICA

and

3 sp

ecia

lists

com

plet

ed a

M

aste

r’s p

rogr

am a

t the

Kaz

akh-

Germ

an

Univ

ersi

ty in

Kaz

akhs

tan

(Alm

aty)

.

The

prog

ram

on

wat

er s

ecto

r ref

orm

s of

th

e Re

publ

ic o

f Taj

ikis

tan

for 2

016-

2025

, ha

s pr

ovis

ions

for t

he d

evel

opm

ent

of n

ew la

ws

and

norm

ativ

e le

gal

docu

men

ts, t

akin

g in

to a

ccou

nt c

limat

e ch

ange

impa

cts

in w

ater

sec

tor.

Thes

e in

clud

e th

e La

w o

f the

RT

“On

Land

Re

clam

atio

n an

d Irr

igat

ion”

, dra

ft o

f th

e ne

w W

ater

Cod

e of

the

Repu

blic

of

Tajik

ista

n, d

evel

opm

ent a

nd a

ppro

val

of re

gula

tions

(cha

rter

s) o

f riv

er b

asin

or

gani

zatio

ns (B

OR) a

nd ri

ver b

asin

co

unci

ls.

As in

pre

viou

s ye

ars,

repr

esen

tativ

es

of th

e M

inis

try

of E

nerg

y an

d W

ater

Re

sour

ces

and

the

Agen

cy fo

r Lan

d Re

clam

atio

n an

d Irr

igat

ion

are

part

of

the

Wat

er a

nd E

nerg

y Co

unci

l of

the

Repu

blic

of T

ajik

ista

n an

d in

the

Coor

dina

ting

Coun

cil f

or w

ater

pol

icy

with

in th

e fr

amew

ork

of In

tegr

ated

W

ater

Res

ourc

e M

anag

emen

t (IW

RM).

The

repr

esen

tativ

es o

f the

Min

istr

y of

En

ergy

and

Wat

er R

esou

rces

, as

wel

l as

Age

ncy

for L

and

Recl

amat

ion

and

Irrig

atio

n ar

e pa

rt o

f the

wor

king

gro

up

for c

reat

ing

wat

er b

asin

s in

the

coun

try.

>>

>>

PPCR

SCO

RECA

RD 2

(CON

TINU

ED)

GOVE

RNM

ENT

CAPA

CITY

Co

mpl

ete

belo

w th

e se

ctor

s id

entif

ied

as a

prio

rity

in th

e PP

CR in

vest

men

t pl

an. I

nser

t oth

er p

riorit

y se

ctor

s or

m

inis

trie

s be

low

(opt

iona

l).

Are

info

rmat

ion,

stu

dies

, and

as

sess

men

ts a

ddre

ssin

g cl

imat

e ch

ange

, var

iabi

lity,

and

resi

lienc

e av

aila

ble?

Is th

e ne

cess

ary

clim

ate

chan

ge

expe

rtis

e av

aila

ble?

Do

nat

iona

l/sec

tor i

ncen

tives

an

d le

gisl

ativ

e po

licie

s ex

pres

sly

addr

ess

clim

ate

chan

ge a

nd

resi

lienc

e?

Does

the

gove

rnm

ent/s

ecto

r pa

rtic

ipat

e in

the

coor

dina

tion

mec

hani

sm?

AB

CD

E

SCOR

E- 2

015

REPO

RTIN

G PE

RIOD

(LAS

T YE

AR)

SCOR

E-20

16

REPO

RTIN

G PE

RIOD

(NEW

)

SCOR

E- 2

015

REPO

RTIN

G PE

RIOD

(LAS

T YE

AR)

SCOR

E-20

16

REPO

RTIN

G PE

RIOD

(NEW

)

SCOR

E- 2

015

REPO

RTIN

G PE

RIOD

(LAS

T YE

AR)

SCOR

E-20

16

REPO

RTIN

G PE

RIOD

(NEW

)

SCOR

E- 2

015

REPO

RTIN

G PE

RIOD

(LAS

T YE

AR)

SCOR

E-20

16

REPO

RTIN

G PE

RIOD

(NEW

)

ANNEXES

| 67 |ENER

GY4

43

43

34

4

How

do

you

just

ify th

e in

crea

se (o

r de

crea

se) i

n sc

ores

bet

wee

n sc

ores

repo

rted

in

201

5 re

port

ing

perio

d a

nd s

core

s re

port

ed in

201

6 re

port

ing

perio

d?

Plea

se

expl

ain!

In 2

016,

a n

umbe

r of r

esea

rch

have

be

en c

ondu

cted

in e

nerg

y se

ctor

, but

th

ey w

ere

mos

tly a

ssoc

iate

d w

ith

cons

truc

tion

of la

rge

pow

er p

lant

s, th

e us

e of

coa

l for

the

ener

gy s

ecto

r, w

ith s

ome

focu

s on

rene

wab

le e

nerg

y. Re

sear

ch s

peci

fic to

clim

ate

chan

ge

issu

es h

ave

been

not

bee

n ca

rrie

d ou

t in

the

ener

gy s

ecto

r

Mor

e th

an 2

0 em

ploy

ees

of th

e M

inis

try

of E

nerg

y an

d Ba

rqi T

ojik

hav

e pa

ssed

tr

aini

ng c

ours

es, b

oth

with

in th

e co

untr

y an

d ab

road

on

issu

es re

late

d to

th

e im

pact

of c

limat

e ch

ange

on

wat

er

and

ener

gy re

sour

ces.

As in

pre

viou

s ye

ars,

in 2

016

cond

uct o

f res

earc

h w

ork

in th

e en

ergy

sec

tor w

as d

esig

nate

d to

the

Scie

ntifi

c Re

sear

ch a

nd D

esig

n In

stitu

te “

Nuro

far”

. The

Inst

itute

has

a

depa

rtm

ent o

n en

viro

nmen

t and

de

velo

pmen

t of E

IA (e

nviro

nmen

tal

impa

ct a

sses

smen

t), w

hich

indi

rect

ly

addr

esse

s is

sues

of c

limat

e ch

ange

im

pact

on

ener

gy s

ecto

r. Th

ere

are

7 em

ploy

ees

wor

king

in th

e de

part

men

t. Th

e In

stitu

te h

as a

Ser

vice

for

calc

ulat

ing

safe

ty o

f hyd

rote

chni

cal

stru

ctur

es. T

here

are

thre

e pe

ople

in

volv

ed in

the

wat

er d

isch

arge

pro

gram

in

hyd

rote

chni

cal s

truc

ture

s, ta

king

into

ac

coun

t clim

ate

chan

ge. I

n th

e En

ergy

Fa

culty

of t

he T

ajik

Tec

hnic

al U

nive

rsity

, ac

adem

ic p

rogr

ams

rela

ted

to c

limat

e ch

ange

impa

cts

on w

ater

and

ene

rgy

reso

urce

s ha

ve b

egun

.

In th

e pr

ogra

m o

n re

new

able

ene

rgy

deve

lopm

ent a

nd s

mal

l hyd

ropo

wer

pl

ants

con

stru

ctio

n fo

r the

per

iod

2016

-202

0, c

limat

e ch

ange

issu

es a

re

part

ially

cov

ered

suc

h as

the

law

s of

th

e Re

publ

ic o

f Taj

ikis

tan

“On

the

use

of

rene

wab

le s

ourc

es o

f ene

rgy”

and

“On

en

ergy

sav

ing

and

ener

gy e

ffici

ency

”. Th

e la

w o

f the

Rep

ublic

of T

ajik

ista

n in

the

field

of e

nerg

y (2

000)

, par

tially

co

vers

clim

ate

chan

ge is

sues

at t

he

sect

or le

vel,

but t

he m

echa

nism

for

impl

emen

tatio

n of

thes

e la

ws

have

not

be

en d

evel

oped

to d

ate.

As in

pre

viou

s ye

ars

the

LLC

“Bar

qi

Tojik

” co

ordi

nate

s th

e PP

CR P

roje

ct

Phas

e 2

in th

e en

ergy

sec

tor:

Incr

easi

ng

resi

lienc

e to

clim

ate

chan

ge in

the

ener

gy s

ecto

r (in

fras

truc

ture

and

en

ablin

g en

viro

nmen

t). T

wo

spec

ialis

ts

are

incl

uded

in th

e PP

CR c

oord

inat

ion

mec

hani

sm, a

nd o

ne e

xper

t fro

m th

e M

inis

try

of E

nerg

y an

d W

ater

Res

ourc

es

is a

mem

ber o

f the

tech

nica

l wor

king

gr

oup

that

act

s as

the

Auth

oriz

ed B

ody

for t

he G

reen

Clim

ate

Fund

.

>>

>>

In D

ecem

ber 2

016,

und

er a

pro

ject

, a

repo

rt w

as p

repa

red,

nam

ed

“Man

agem

ent o

f wat

er re

sour

ces

in T

ajik

ista

n”, i

n or

der t

o su

ppor

t th

e de

velo

pmen

t of a

wat

er p

lan

for

Syrd

arya

rive

r (Ta

jik p

art)

, whi

ch d

eals

w

ith th

e im

pact

s of

clim

ate

chan

ge o

n w

ater

reso

urce

s of

Syr

dary

a Ri

ver B

asin

.

Othe

r rel

evan

t law

s, in

clud

e th

e la

w

“On

wat

er u

ser a

ssoc

iatio

ns”

and

“On

Drin

king

Wat

er a

nd D

rinki

ng W

ater

Su

pply

”, w

hich

requ

ire c

hang

es to

fact

or

adap

tatio

n m

easu

res

agai

nst c

limat

e ch

ange

, and

to in

tegr

ate

prin

cipl

es o

f In

tegr

ated

Wat

er R

esou

rce

Man

agem

ent

(IWRM

).

As in

pre

viou

s ye

ars,

repr

esen

tativ

es

of th

ese

orga

niza

tions

are

par

t of t

he

PPCR

tech

nica

l wor

king

gro

up a

nd

the

COEP

, the

des

igna

ted

body

for t

he

Gree

n Cl

imat

e Fu

nd in

Taj

ikis

tan.

The

PP

CR te

chni

cal w

orki

ng g

roup

from

the

Min

istr

y of

Ene

rgy

and

Wat

er R

esou

rces

in

clud

es th

e he

ad o

f the

dep

artm

ent

of th

e in

ters

tate

com

mis

sion

for w

ater

re

sour

ces,

and

dire

ctor

of t

he w

ater

us

ers

asso

ciat

ion

man

agem

ent,

at th

e irr

igat

ion

and

mel

iora

tion

agen

cy


DISA

STER

RIS

K RE

DUCT

ION

45

34

22

33

How

do

you

just

ify th

e in

crea

se (o

r de

crea

se) i

n sc

ores

bet

wee

n sc

ores

repo

rted

in

201

5 re

port

ing

perio

d a

nd s

core

s re

port

ed in

201

6 re

port

ing

perio

d?

Plea

se

expl

ain!

In D

ecem

ber 2

016,

with

sup

port

from

th

e W

orld

Ban

k a

key

stud

y w

as

cond

ucte

d – “

Soci

al A

sses

smen

t of

stre

ngth

enin

g cr

itica

l inf

rast

ruct

ure

agai

nst n

atur

al d

isas

ters

”. Th

e ai

m

of th

e so

cial

ass

essm

ent w

as to

st

udy

soci

o-ec

onom

ic s

ituat

ion

of

conj

ectu

ral p

roje

ct a

reas

in te

rms

of ty

pes

and

freq

uenc

y of

nat

ural

di

sast

ers,

amou

nt o

f dam

ages

, ear

ly

war

ning

sys

tem

s, re

sett

lem

ent p

lans

in

em

erge

ncy

situ

atio

ns a

nd c

limat

e ch

ange

impa

cts.

In D

ecem

ber 2

016,

a

first

repo

rt o

f the

pro

ject

“W

ater

re

sour

ces

man

agem

ent i

n Ta

jikis

tan”

to

supp

ort t

he d

evel

opm

ent o

f wat

er p

lan

for S

yrda

rya

river

(Taj

ik p

art)

has

bee

n pr

epar

ed, w

hich

revi

ews

the

impa

ct o

f cl

imat

e ch

ange

on

freq

uenc

y of

nat

ural

di

sast

ers

in S

yrda

rya

river

bas

in.

Due

to th

e re

orga

niza

tion

of

Hydr

omet

eoro

logy

Age

ncy,

in

terv

entio

ns s

uppo

rted

by

the

ADB

proj

ect “

Clim

ate

Chan

ge C

apac

ity

Build

ing”

incl

udin

g th

e in

take

of

stud

ents

for t

he s

ubje

ct o

f clim

ate

chan

ge p

redi

ctio

n ha

ve b

een

post

pone

d to

the

end

of 2

017.

In 2

016

mor

e th

an 15

em

ploy

ees

of th

e Co

mm

ittee

fo

r Em

erge

ncy

Situ

atio

ns a

nd C

ivil

Defe

nse

and

the

Stat

e Ag

ency

for

Hydr

omet

eoro

logy

hav

e un

derg

one

trai

ning

cou

rses

in J

apan

and

the

Unite

d St

ates

.

As in

201

5, s

igni

fican

t cha

nges

in th

e le

gisl

ativ

e in

cent

ives

wer

e ob

serv

ed.

At th

e Co

mm

ittee

of E

mer

genc

y Si

tuat

ions

and

Civ

il De

fens

e, th

ere

is a

n in

ter-

agen

cy c

oord

inat

ion

mec

hani

sm to

re

duce

the

impa

ct o

f nat

ural

dis

aste

rs,

nam

ed -

“Nat

iona

l Pla

tform

for D

isas

ter

Risk

Red

uctio

n”. A

s in

pre

viou

s ye

ars,

a re

pres

enta

tive

of th

e Co

mm

ittee

fo

r Em

erge

ncy

Situ

atio

ns a

nd C

ivil

Defe

nse

(the

hea

d of

the

depa

rtm

ent

on p

rote

ctio

n of

pop

ulat

ion

and

terr

itorie

s), a

repr

esen

tativ

e of

NGO

and

th

e di

rect

or o

f the

Cen

ter o

n Cl

imat

e Ch

ange

and

Dis

aste

r Ris

k Re

duct

ion

are

part

of t

he in

ter-

sect

oria

l coo

rdin

atio

n m

echa

nism

.

>>

>>

PPCR

SCO

RECA

RD 2

(CON

TINU

ED)

GOVE

RNM

ENT

CAPA

CITY

Co

mpl

ete

belo

w th

e se

ctor

s id

entif

ied

as a

prio

rity

in th

e PP

CR in

vest

men

t pl

an. I

nser

t oth

er p

riorit

y se

ctor

s or

m

inis

trie

s be

low

(opt

iona

l).

Are

info

rmat

ion,

stu

dies

, and

as

sess

men

ts a

ddre

ssin

g cl

imat

e ch

ange

, var

iabi

lity,

and

resi

lienc

e av

aila

ble?

Is th

e ne

cess

ary

clim

ate

chan

ge

expe

rtis

e av

aila

ble?

Do

nat

iona

l/sec

tor i

ncen

tives

an

d le

gisl

ativ

e po

licie

s ex

pres

sly

addr

ess

clim

ate

chan

ge a

nd

resi

lienc

e?

Does

the

gove

rnm

ent/s

ecto

r pa

rtic

ipat

e in

the

coor

dina

tion

mec

hani

sm?

AB

CD

E

SCOR

E- 2

015

REPO

RTIN

G PE

RIOD

(LAS

T YE

AR)

SCOR

E-20

16

REPO

RTIN

G PE

RIOD

(NEW

)

SCOR

E- 2

015

REPO

RTIN

G PE

RIOD

(LAS

T YE

AR)

SCOR

E-20

16

REPO

RTIN

G PE

RIOD

(NEW

)

SCOR

E- 2

015

REPO

RTIN

G PE

RIOD

(LAS

T YE

AR)

SCOR

E-20

16

REPO

RTIN

G PE

RIOD

(NEW

)

SCOR

E- 2

015

REPO

RTIN

G PE

RIOD

(LAS

T YE

AR)

SCOR

E-20

16

REPO

RTIN

G PE

RIOD

(NEW

)

ANNEXES

| 69 |>> EDUC

ATIO

N3

35

52

22

3

How

do

you

just

ify th

e in

crea

se (o

r de

crea

se) i

n sc

ores

bet

wee

n sc

ores

repo

rted

la

st y

ear (

2015

) and

sco

res

repo

rted

this

ye

ar (2

016)

? P

leas

e ex

plai

n!

In M

arch

201

6, u

nder

the

proj

ect T

A-80

90: B

uild

ing

Capa

city

for C

limat

e Re

silie

nce,

the

NGO

“Kuh

isto

n”

Foun

datio

n pr

epar

ed a

repo

rt ti

tled

“Ass

essm

ent o

f clim

ate

chan

ge

awar

enes

s am

ong

the

popu

latio

n in

sel

ecte

d ar

eas

of th

e Re

publ

ic o

f Ta

jikis

tan”

.

In 2

016,

in fo

ur u

nive

rsiti

es a

nd o

ne

Lyce

um, c

urric

ulum

s pr

ovid

ing

optio

ns

to ta

ke c

ours

es o

n th

e “I

ntro

duct

ion

to th

e sc

ienc

e of

clim

ate

chan

ge”

wer

e co

ntin

ued.

Und

er th

e UN

DP

envi

ronm

enta

l edu

catio

n pr

ojec

t, th

ere

wer

e re

sour

ce c

ente

rs o

pene

d at

Ta

jik T

echn

ical

Uni

vers

ity a

nd In

stitu

te

of P

ostg

radu

ate

Educ

atio

n, w

hich

de

velo

ped

trai

ning

mod

ules

on

clim

ate

chan

ge fo

r sch

ools

and

uni

vers

ities

. In

201

6, m

ore

than

10 p

ost g

radu

ate

stud

ents

hav

e pr

oduc

ed re

sear

ch o

n th

e cl

imat

e ch

ange

sub

ject

. At p

rese

nt,

mor

e th

an 2

50 s

tude

nts,

grad

uate

st

uden

ts a

nd te

ache

rs a

re fa

mili

ar w

ith

the

issu

es o

f clim

ate

chan

ge in

the

educ

atio

n sy

stem

In 2

016,

as

in p

revi

ous

year

s, th

ere

are

no ta

rget

ed la

ws

and

ince

ntiv

es

that

con

side

r clim

ate

chan

ge a

nd

sust

aina

bilit

y in

edu

catio

n. S

ome

ques

tions

abo

ut c

limat

e ch

ange

are

ad

dres

sed

in th

e La

w o

f the

Rep

ublic

of

Taj

ikis

tan

“On

envi

ronm

enta

l ed

ucat

ion”

, und

er th

e re

solu

tion

No.6

73,

date

d fr

om D

ecem

ber 2

2, 2

010.

The

M

inis

try

of E

duca

tion

plan

s to

mak

e ch

ange

s in

this

Law

, to

refle

ct c

limat

e ch

ange

issu

es m

ore

expl

icitl

y

In 2

016,

the

part

icip

atio

n of

edu

catio

n se

ctor

in th

e PP

CR c

oord

inat

ion

mec

hani

sm h

as re

mai

ned

the

sam

e.

At th

e sa

me

time,

repr

esen

tativ

es o

f th

e M

inis

try

of E

duca

tion

beca

me

part

of

the

coor

dina

tion

mec

hani

sm th

at

acts

as

the

Auth

oriz

ed B

ody

for t

he

Gree

n Cl

imat

e Fu

nd. T

he H

ead

of th

e In

tern

atio

nal R

elat

ions

Dep

artm

ent,

Vice

-Rec

tor o

f the

Taj

ik T

echn

ical

Un

iver

sity

are

mem

bers

of t

he te

chni

cal

wor

king

gro

up o

f PPC

R an

d th

at o

f th

e te

chni

cal w

orki

ng g

roup

for t

he

auth

oriz

ed b

ody

for t

he G

reen

Clim

ate

Fund

.

HEAL

TH2

33

33

33

3

How

do

you

just

ify th

e in

crea

se (o

r de

crea

se) i

n sc

ores

bet

wee

n sc

ores

repo

rted

in

201

5 re

port

ing

perio

d a

nd s

core

s re

port

ed in

201

6 re

port

ing

perio

d?

Plea

se

expl

ain!

A re

port

title

d “H

ealth

vul

nera

bilit

y As

sess

men

t of t

he p

opul

atio

n of

Ta

jikis

tan

in th

e cl

imat

e ch

ange

con

text

” w

as p

repa

red.

The

doc

umen

t pro

vide

s ba

ckgr

ound

info

rmat

ion

to d

eter

min

e he

alth

sys

tem

pol

icy

in th

e co

ntex

t of

clim

ate

chan

ge, t

o de

velo

p ad

apta

tion

mea

sure

s to

redu

ce n

egat

ive

impa

cts

of c

limat

e ch

ange

on

heal

th a

nd to

im

prov

e pu

blic

hea

lth a

nd a

chie

ve

long

evity

. The

repo

rt is

cur

rent

ly a

t the

st

age

of a

ppro

val a

nd p

repa

ratio

ns a

re

unde

r way

for i

ts d

istr

ibut

ion.

In th

e M

inis

try

of H

ealth

, as

in p

revi

ous

year

s, th

ere

are

five

empl

oyee

s, w

ho

wor

k on

issu

es re

late

d to

clim

ate

chan

ge im

pact

s on

pop

ulat

ion’

s he

alth

. Th

ree

staf

f mem

bers

att

ende

d tr

aini

ng

cour

ses

abro

ad o

n th

e su

bjec

ts re

late

d to

clim

ate

chan

ge im

pact

on

publ

ic

heal

th.

As in

pre

viou

s ye

ars,

Tajik

ista

n ha

s la

ws:

“On

pub

lic h

ealth

pro

tect

ion”

, “On

re

prod

uctiv

e he

alth

and

repr

oduc

tive

right

s”, “

On e

nsur

ing

sani

tary

an

d ep

idem

iolo

gica

l saf

ety

of th

e po

pula

tion”

, whi

ch p

artly

cov

er th

e is

sues

of c

limat

e ch

ange

impa

cts

on

heal

th.

In 2

016,

a re

pres

enta

tive

of th

e M

inis

try

of H

ealth

and

Soc

ial P

rote

ctio

n be

cam

e pa

rt o

f the

tech

nica

l wor

king

gro

up

that

act

s as

the

Auth

oriz

ed B

ody

for

the

Gree

n Cl

imat

e Fu

nd. I

n 20

16, a

s in

pr

evio

us y

ears

, one

repr

esen

tativ

e fr

om th

e M

inis

try

of H

ealth

and

Soc

ial

Prot

ectio

n (H

ead

of s

anita

tion

and

hygi

ene

cont

rol)

was

a m

embe

r of t

he

tech

nica

l wor

king

gro

up o

f the

PPC

R Co

ordi

natio

n M

echa

nism

. The

Nat

iona

l Co

ordi

natin

g Co

mm

ittee

(NCC

) for

co

mba

ting

tube

rcul

osis

and

mal

aria

in

the

coun

try

has

a Se

cret

aria

t and

Te

chni

cal W

orki

ng G

roup

. Offi

cial

s fr

om th

e M

inis

try

of H

ealth

and

Soc

ial

Prot

ectio

n ar

e re

pres

ente

d in

the

tech

nica

l wor

king

gro

up o

f the

Gre

en

Clim

ate

Fund

.

>>


PPCR

SCO

RECA

RD 2

(CON

TINU

ED)

Coor

dina

tion

Mec

hani

sm

Nam

e th

e co

ordi

natio

n m

echa

nism

bel

ow

Is th

e co

ordi

natio

n m

echa

nism

fu

nctio

nal e

.g.,

esta

blis

hed,

ef

fect

ive

and

effic

ient

?

Does

it c

oord

inat

e cl

imat

e re

silie

nce

inte

rven

tions

oth

er th

an

thos

e fu

nded

by

PPCR

?

Is th

ere

a br

oad

set o

f non

-go

vern

men

tal s

take

hold

ers

invo

lved

?Is

the

rele

vant

clim

ate

resi

lienc

e in

form

atio

n in

the

publ

ic d

omai

n?Ar

e fe

mal

es a

nd m

ales

pa

rtic

ipat

ing

equa

lly?

SC

ORE

REPO

RTED

LA

ST Y

EAR

(201

5)SC

ORE

IN 2

016

(NEW

)SC

ORE

REPO

RTED

LA

ST Y

EAR

(201

5)SC

ORE

IN 2

016

(NEW

)SC

ORE

REPO

RTED

LA

ST Y

EAR

(201

5)SC

ORE

IN 2

016

(NEW

)SC

ORE

REPO

RTED

LA

ST Y

EAR

(201

5)SC

ORE

IN 2

016

(NEW

)SC

ORE

REPO

RTED

LA

ST Y

EAR

(201

5)SC

ORE

IN 2

016

(NEW

)

COOR

DINA

TION

W

ORKI

NG G

ROUP

45

45

55

66

55

How

do

you

just

ify th

e in

crea

se (o

r dec

reas

e) in

sc

ores

bet

wee

n sc

ores

re

port

ed in

201

5 re

port

ing

perio

d a

nd s

core

s re

port

ed in

201

6 re

port

ing

perio

d?

Plea

se e

xpla

in!

In 2

016,

the

tech

nica

l gro

up

mem

bers

of t

he P

PCR

coor

dina

tion

mec

hani

sm h

ave

part

icip

ated

in th

e de

velo

pmen

t of t

he N

atio

nal C

limat

e Ch

ange

Ada

ptat

ion

Stra

tegy

. Due

to

thei

r dire

ct c

ontr

ibut

ion,

mor

e th

an

30 in

vest

men

t pro

ject

s re

leva

nt to

cl

imat

e ch

ange

ada

ptat

ion

have

be

en d

evel

oped

. With

the

dire

ct

part

icip

atio

n of

mem

bers

of P

PCR

coor

dina

ting

mec

hani

sm, t

he

asse

ssm

ent o

f mai

n in

dica

tors

of

Clim

ate

Inve

stm

ent F

und

is b

eing

co

nduc

ted,

bot

h at

the

natio

nal

leve

l, an

d at

the

leve

l of P

PCR

proj

ects

. Fou

r mee

tings

of t

he P

PCR

coor

dina

tion

mec

hani

sm re

view

ed

proj

ects

sub

mitt

ed to

the

Gree

n Cl

imat

e Fu

nd. M

ost o

f the

tech

nica

l w

orki

ng g

roup

mem

bers

wer

e in

clud

ed in

Tec

hnic

al G

roup

of t

he

Gree

n Cl

imat

e Fu

nd, f

or w

hich

, the

Au

thor

ized

Bod

y is

the

Com

mitt

ee

for E

nviro

nmen

tal P

rote

ctio

n

As in

pre

viou

s ye

ars,

the

coor

dina

tion

wor

king

gro

up is

mai

nly

enga

ged

in c

oord

inat

ion

of c

limat

e ch

ange

resi

lienc

e in

terv

entio

ns

fund

ed th

roug

h th

e PP

CR. A

t the

sa

me

time,

mem

bers

of t

he te

chni

cal

grou

p an

d th

e PP

CR S

ecre

taria

t pa

rtic

ipat

ed in

dis

cuss

ions

on

impl

emen

tatio

n of

pro

ject

s lin

ked

to

clim

ate

chan

ge is

sues

fund

ed a

nd

or im

plem

ente

d by

inte

rnat

iona

l or

gani

zatio

ns. I

n 20

16, t

he m

embe

rs

of th

e PP

CR c

oord

inat

ion

wor

king

gr

oup

wer

e in

clud

ed in

the

tech

nica

l w

orki

ng g

roup

of t

he C

omm

ittee

on

Env

ironm

enta

l Pro

tect

ion,

the

Auth

oriz

ed b

ody

for t

he G

reen

Cl

imat

e Fu

nd.

Curr

ently

, fro

m 2

0 m

embe

rs o

f th

e PP

CR C

oord

inat

ion

Mec

hani

sm

wor

king

gro

up, 4

mem

bers

repr

esen

t no

n-go

vern

men

tal o

rgan

izat

ions

. Ov

eral

l, 20

% o

f the

PPC

R w

orki

ng

grou

p m

embe

rs a

re re

pres

enta

tives

of

pub

lic o

rgan

izat

ions

. Fro

m th

e to

tal n

umbe

r of n

on-g

over

nmen

tal

orga

niza

tions

, tw

o or

gani

zatio

ns a

re

dire

ctly

wor

king

with

clim

ate

chan

ge

issu

es a

nd tw

o ot

her o

rgan

izat

ions

w

ork

on g

ende

r and

edu

catio

n is

sues

as

soci

ated

to c

limat

e ch

ange

.

Durin

g 20

16 th

e re

port

ing

perio

d th

e PP

CR w

ebsi

te (h

ttp:

//w

ww.

ppcr

.tj/

inde

x.ph

p/ru

/dow

nloa

ds) h

as b

een

impr

oved

with

a s

peci

al s

yste

m fo

r st

orag

e an

d di

strib

utio

n of

dat

a.

PPCR

info

rmat

ion

was

dis

sem

inat

ed

on s

ocia

l med

ia s

uch

as th

roug

h Fa

cebo

ok (w

ww.

face

book

.tj/p

pcr.t

j) an

d on

You

Tube

(reg

iste

red

dom

ain

for t

he p

latfo

rm w

ith th

e na

me

– IQ

LIM

.TJ).

Curr

ently

a P

latfo

rm h

as

been

dev

elop

ed o

n cl

imat

e ch

ange

kn

owle

dge

man

agem

ent -

ww

w.iq

lim.

tj an

d th

e da

ta c

olle

ctio

n pr

oces

s is

ong

oing

. Inf

orm

atio

n on

clim

ate

chan

ge is

als

o di

ssem

inat

ed th

roug

h w

ebsi

tes

of N

GOs

such

as

the

NGO

0 Cl

imat

e Ne

twor

k (w

ww.

tajc

n.tj)

, You

th

Eco

Cent

er (w

ww.

ecoc

entr

e.tj)

, Litt

le

Eart

h (w

ww.

little

eart

h.in

fo.m

s) a

nd

web

site

s of

Clim

ate

netw

ork

NGOs

of

EECC

A co

untr

ies

such

as

the

http

://in

focl

imat

e.or

g. C

limat

e in

form

atio

n an

d m

essa

ges

are

also

dis

sem

inat

ed

thro

ugh

elec

tron

ic d

iges

ts, p

rinte

d m

agaz

ines

suc

h as

the

Gree

n En

ergy

and

We,

Tab

iat a

nd o

ther

s. Th

e Co

mm

ittee

for E

nviro

nmen

tal

Prot

ectio

n un

der t

he G

over

nmen

t of

Taj

ikis

tan

(htt

p://

ww

w.hi

fzita

biat

.tj)

and

the

Depa

rtm

ent f

or

Envi

ronm

enta

l Edu

catio

n is

sued

ne

wsl

ette

rs, m

agaz

ines

, new

spap

ers

and

mat

eria

ls c

over

ing

impo

rtan

t en

viro

nmen

tal i

ssue

s, in

clud

ing

clim

ate

chan

ge. C

limat

e up

date

s an

d in

form

atio

n ar

e al

so m

ade

avai

labl

e on

the

web

site

of t

he A

genc

y fo

r Hy

drom

eteo

rolo

gy (w

ww.

met

eo.tj

)

Durin

g th

e re

port

ing

perio

d, g

ende

r ba

lanc

e in

the

Coor

dina

ting

Wor

king

Gr

oup

rem

aine

d th

e sa

me.

Fro

m 2

0 m

embe

rs o

f the

wor

king

gro

up, 6

m

embe

rs a

re w

omen

(30%

). Fr

om

the

tota

l num

ber o

f wom

en th

ree

are

repr

esen

tativ

es o

f gov

ernm

ent

agen

cies

and

thre

e re

pres

ent n

on-

gove

rnm

enta

l org

aniz

atio

ns.

>>

ANNEXES

| 71 |

INST

RUCT

IONS

: 1.

Plea

se e

stab

lish

scor

ing

crite

ria fo

r eac

h of

the

aspe

cts

of th

is s

core

card

and

sub

mit

them

with

you

r rep

ort.

This

sho

uld

be d

one

once

, pre

fera

bly

at b

asel

ine

stag

e an

d us

ed d

urin

g su

bseq

uent

repo

rtin

g ye

ars.

2.

If y

ou h

ave

prev

ious

ly e

stab

lishe

d yo

ur s

corin

g cr

iteria

, use

them

and

sub

mit

them

with

you

r rep

ort.

3. S

core

eac

h ce

ll w

ith a

sco

re b

etw

een

0 an

d 10

(ref

er to

you

r sco

ring

crite

ria d

efin

ed fo

r thi

s sc

orec

ard)

4.

Pro

vide

exp

lana

tion

of c

hang

e in

sco

res

betw

een

2014

and

201

5 in

app

ropr

iate

cel

ls a

nd a

void

abb

revi

atio

ns.

GEND

ER C

ONSI

DERA

TION

S AN

D CO

ORDI

NATI

ON M

ECHA

NISM

Plea

se e

labo

rate

on

whe

ther

and

how

gen

der g

ood

prac

tice

at th

e in

stitu

tiona

l lev

el h

as b

een

mai

nstr

eam

ed in

to th

e co

ordi

natio

n m

echa

nism

uni

t. Th

is s

houl

d in

clud

e co

mm

enta

ry o

n th

e nu

mbe

r of t

echn

ical

sta

ff (w

omen

, men

) in

the

unit

and

whe

ther

any

gen

der t

rain

ing/

capa

city

-bui

ldin

g ha

s be

en o

ffere

d w

ith P

PCR

supp

ort t

o st

aff i

n th

e co

ordi

natio

n un

it (w

omen

, men

) or o

ther

gov

ernm

ent s

taff

wor

king

on

clim

ate

chan

ge.

Of th

e to

tal n

umbe

r of t

he P

PCR

Coor

dina

tion

Mec

hani

sm’s

tech

nica

l wor

king

gro

up m

embe

rs (2

0 pe

rson

s), 7

mem

bers

are

wom

en (3

5%).

Of th

e to

tal n

umbe

r of w

omen

, fou

r are

re

pres

enta

tives

of t

he g

over

nmen

t str

uctu

res,

and

thre

e re

pres

ent N

on-G

over

nmen

t Org

aniz

atio

ns (N

GOs)

. Mor

e th

an 3

0% o

f gov

ernm

ent a

genc

ies’

per

sonn

el, w

ho a

tten

d se

min

ars,

trai

ning

s an

d co

nfer

ence

s bo

th in

the

coun

try

and

abro

ad a

re w

omen

. Mor

e th

an 2

5% o

f stu

dent

s en

rolle

d in

five

hig

her e

duca

tiona

l est

ablis

hmen

ts, s

tudy

ing

“Int

rodu

ctio

n to

the

Clim

ate

Chan

ge”,

are

fem

ale.

Mor

e th

an 3

0% o

f the

per

sonn

el in

the

gove

rnm

ent s

truc

ture

s, ad

dres

sing

clim

ate

chan

ge is

sues

, are

wom

en.

LESS

ONS

LEAR

NED

Wha

t hav

e be

en th

e ke

y su

cces

ses

whe

n st

reng

then

ing

the

Gove

rnm

ent c

apac

ity a

nd th

e co

ordi

natio

n m

echa

nism

?

1. In

201

6, in

five

est

ablis

hed

Info

rmat

ion

Cent

ers

on ra

isin

g aw

aren

ess

abou

t clim

ate

chan

ge w

orks

hops

for t

he p

ublic

inst

itutio

ns h

ave

been

con

duct

ed o

n cl

imat

e ch

ange

issu

es (t

otal

nu

mbe

r of p

artic

ipan

ts w

ere

mor

e th

an 15

0 pe

ople

)

2.Fo

r the

repr

esen

tativ

es o

f key

min

istr

ies

and

agen

cies

, tw

o w

eek

retr

eats

hav

e be

en o

rgan

ized

on

the

subj

ect o

f dev

elop

men

t fin

anci

al p

ropo

sals

on

clim

ate

chan

ge a

dapt

atio

n is

sues

in

the

Gree

n Cl

imat

e Fu

nd.

Wha

t hav

e be

en th

e ke

y ch

alle

nges

and

wha

t opp

ortu

nitie

s fo

r im

prov

emen

t do

you

see?

1. In

the

adop

ted

by G

over

nmen

t the

Nat

iona

l Dev

elop

men

t Str

ateg

y of

the

Repu

blic

of T

ajik

ista

n un

til 2

030

it is

not

ed th

at o

ne o

f the

cha

lleng

es fo

r miti

gatio

n an

d ad

apta

tion

to c

limat

e ch

ange

is th

e im

perf

ectio

n of

the

lega

l fra

mew

ork

and

man

agem

ent m

echa

nism

. Lac

k of

ince

ntiv

es a

nd le

gisl

ativ

e po

licy

on c

limat

e ch

ange

and

resi

stan

ce is

sues

, bot

h at

the

cent

ral

gove

rnm

ent l

evel

and

at t

he le

vel o

f key

min

istr

ies

do n

ot g

ive

the

oppo

rtun

ity to

dev

elop

clim

ate

chan

ge p

lann

ing

at k

ey s

ecto

rs le

vel.

2. 2

. In

acco

rdan

ce w

ith th

e dr

aft o

f the

Nat

iona

l Clim

ate

Chan

ge A

dapt

atio

n St

rate

gy, i

t is

nece

ssar

y to

dev

elop

a la

w o

n cl

imat

e ch

ange

. It i

s ad

visa

ble

to in

clud

e fu

nctio

ns a

ssoc

iate

d w

ith c

limat

e ch

ange

issu

es in

the

com

pete

nce

of th

e Co

mm

ittee

for E

nviro

nmen

tal P

rote

ctio

n w

ith e

stab

lishm

ent o

f app

ropr

iate

age

ncy.

SHAR

ING

EXPE

RIEN

CES

Plea

se le

t us

have

som

e in

sigh

ts in

to th

e pa

rtic

ular

exp

erie

nce

of y

our c

ount

ry w

ith s

tren

gthe

ning

the

Gove

rnem

ent c

apac

ity a

nd th

e co

ordi

natio

n m

echa

nism

to m

ains

trea

m c

limat

e re

silie

nce.

1. Th

e te

chni

cal w

orki

ng g

roup

est

ablis

hed

with

in c

oord

inat

ion

mec

hani

sm, w

hich

con

sist

s fr

om re

pres

enta

tives

of k

ey m

inis

trie

s an

d ag

enci

es, r

esea

rch

cent

ers

and

non-

gove

rnm

enta

l or

gani

zatio

ns a

t the

PPC

R le

vel,

curr

ently

bec

ome

a m

ajor

pot

entia

l on

issu

es re

late

d to

clim

ate

chan

ge a

t Aut

horiz

ed B

ody

in th

e Gr

een

Clim

ate

Fund

.

>>

| 72 |


PPCR

SCO

RECA

RD 3

DATE

OF

REPO

RT:

06/3

0/17

PPCR

COR

E IN

DICA

TOR

3: Q

UALI

TY O

F AN

D EX

TENT

TO

WHI

CH C

LIM

ATE

RESP

ONSI

VE IN

STRU

MEN

TS/I

NVES

TMEN

T M

ODEL

S AR

E DE

VELO

PED

AND

TEST

EDDA

TA C

OLLE

CTIO

N M

ETHO

D: S

CORE

D AT

THE

PRO

JECT

-LEV

EL A

ND C

OMPI

LED

AT T

HE P

PCR

INVE

STM

ENT

PLAN

LEV

EL

PPCR

INVE

STM

ENT

PLAN

DOM

INIC

A

COUN

TRY

AGGR

EGAT

E RE

PORT

REPO

RTIN

G PE

RIOD

:Fr

om: J

anua

ry 1,

201

6

To:

Dece

mbe

r 31,

2016

PROJ

ECT

TITL

ECl

imat

e re

spon

sive

inst

rum

ent/

inve

stm

ent m

odel

s id

entif

ied:

Has

the

inst

rum

ent/

in

vest

men

t mod

el b

een

deve

lope

d an

d te

sted

?

Has

the

inst

rum

ent/

in

vest

men

t mod

el b

een

impl

emen

ted

to th

e sc

ale

prop

osed

?

Has

the

inst

rum

ent/

inve

stm

ent

mod

el a

ppro

pria

tely

in

corp

orat

ed th

e ne

eds

of b

oth

fem

ales

and

mal

es in

to it

s de

sign

and

impl

emen

tatio

n?

Has

the

inst

rum

ent/

inve

stm

ent

mod

el in

corp

orat

ed th

e ne

eds

of

vuln

erab

le p

opul

atio

ns in

to it

s de

sign

an

d im

plem

enta

tion?

A#

BC

DE

F

1In

crea

sed

wat

er s

tora

ge c

apac

ity in

pr

ojec

t are

as7

48

8

DISA

STER

VU

LNER

ABIL

ITY

REDU

CTIO

N PR

OJEC

T (D

VRP)

Brie

fly c

omm

ent o

n ea

ch s

core

Bidd

ing

proc

ess

com

plet

ed in

De

cem

ber 2

016

and

cont

ract

aw

arde

d fo

r con

stru

ctio

n of

8

wat

er s

tora

ge ta

nks

alon

g th

e W

est C

oast

; wor

ks c

omm

ence

d in

M

arch

201

7.

Impl

emen

tatio

n be

twee

n 26

- 50

% o

f pro

pose

d sc

ale

sinc

e pr

ocur

emen

t pr

oces

s fo

r con

trac

t aw

ard

com

plet

ed; t

anks

will

be

fully

co

mm

issi

oned

Feb

/Mar

ch 2

018.

Appr

oxim

atel

y eq

ual n

umbe

r of

mal

es a

nd fe

mal

es n

eeds

in

corp

orat

ed in

to th

e pr

ojec

t.

Over

70%

of t

he n

eeds

of v

ulne

rabl

e po

pula

tions

inco

rpor

ated

into

the

proj

ect

desi

gn a

nd im

plem

enta

tion.

The

pro

ject

lo

catio

n se

lect

ion

was

a d

irect

resu

lt of

th

e vu

lner

abili

ties

iden

tifie

d.

2Hy

drom

eteo

rolo

gy A

sses

smen

t10

1010

10

Brie

fly c

omm

ent o

n ea

ch s

core

Hydr

omet

ass

essm

ent

com

plet

ed; A

pril

2015

.Hy

drom

et a

sses

smen

t co

mpl

eted

; Apr

il 20

15.

Full

and

equa

l par

ticip

atio

n of

m

ales

and

fem

ales

.10

0% o

f inv

estm

ents

inco

rpor

ated

nee

ds

of v

ulne

rabl

e po

pula

tions

.

3Re

habi

litat

ion

of R

ural

Roa

ds -

Road

W

orks

Eas

tern

Isla

nd (I

mm

edia

te

Wor

ks)

65

88

Brie

fly c

omm

ent o

n ea

ch s

core

Desi

gns

for t

he Im

med

iate

Wor

ks

alon

g th

e id

entif

ied

rout

e (E

ast

Coas

t) c

ompl

eted

. Pr

epar

ator

y pr

ocur

emen

t act

iviti

es fo

r co

ntra

ctin

g a

Desi

gn F

irm fo

r Pr

e-en

gine

erin

g an

d de

sign

se

rvic

es (l

ong-

term

wor

ks)

appr

oxim

atel

y 10

% c

ompl

ete.

Co

ntra

ct A

war

d ex

pect

ed b

y Ap

ril 2

017.

The

inve

stm

ent h

as s

urpa

ssed

or

igin

al im

plem

enta

tion

of th

e pr

opos

ed s

cale

sin

ce o

rigin

ally

th

e Im

med

iate

Wor

ks w

as n

ot

part

of t

he p

roje

ct.

Appr

oxim

atel

y eq

ual n

umbe

r of

mal

es a

nd fe

mal

es p

artic

ipat

e.Ov

er 7

0% o

f the

nee

ds o

f vul

nera

ble

popu

latio

ns in

corp

orat

ed in

to th

e pr

ojec

t des

ign

and

impl

emen

tatio

n. T

he

proj

ect l

ocat

ion

sele

ctio

n w

as a

dire

ct

resu

lt of

the

vuln

erab

ilitie

s id

entif

ied.

Ad

ditio

nally

, an

Indi

geno

us P

eopl

es

Plan

was

dev

elop

ed to

ens

ure

that

th

e rig

hts

of In

dige

nous

Per

sons

are

ta

ken

into

con

side

ratio

n du

ring

proj

ect

impl

emen

tatio

n.

Annex

7E

XA

MP

LE

OF

SC

OR

ECA

RD

3 F

OR

CO

RE

IND

ICA

TOR

3

>>

ANNEXES

| 73 |

>>

>>

>>

DISA

STER

VU

LNER

ABIL

ITY

REDU

CTIO

N PR

OJEC

T (D

VRP)

4Re

habi

litat

ion

of R

ural

Roa

ds -

Road

W

orks

Eas

tern

Isla

nd (L

ong-

term

W

orks

)2

27

8

Brie

fly c

omm

ent o

n ea

ch s

core

Proc

urem

ent p

roce

dure

s fo

r co

ntra

ct a

war

d fo

r Con

sulta

ncy

Serv

ices

- Pr

e-en

gine

erin

g &

Desi

gn S

ervi

ces

com

men

ced.

25%

impl

emen

tatio

n of

pr

opos

ed s

cale

.Ap

prox

imat

ely

equa

l num

ber o

f m

ales

and

fem

ales

par

ticip

ate.

Over

70%

of t

he n

eeds

of v

ulne

rabl

e po

pula

tions

inco

rpor

ated

into

the

proj

ect d

esig

n an

d im

plem

enta

tion.

The

pr

ojec

t loc

atio

n se

lect

ion

was

a d

irect

re

sult

of th

e vu

lner

abili

ties

iden

tifie

d.

Addi

tiona

lly, a

n In

dige

nous

Peo

ples

Pl

an w

as d

evel

oped

to e

nsur

e th

at

the

right

s of

Indi

geno

us P

erso

ns a

re

take

n in

to c

onsi

dera

tion

durin

g pr

ojec

t im

plem

enta

tion.

5De

velo

pmen

t of t

opog

raph

ic d

ata

(con

trol

net

wor

k) a

nd h

igh

reso

lutio

n m

aps

(LiD

AR)

42

88

Br

iefly

com

men

t on

each

sco

rePr

ocur

emen

t and

Inst

alla

tion

of T

ide

Gaug

es -

a co

mpo

nent

of

LiD

AR w

as c

ompl

eted

. St

anda

rd B

iddi

ng D

ocum

ents

for

unde

rtak

ing

the

topo

grap

hic

and

bath

ymet

ric s

urve

y is

sued

with

bi

d op

enin

g he

ld in

Jan

uary

201

7.

Appr

oxim

atel

y 25

% o

f ac

tiviti

es re

late

d to

LiD

AR

com

plet

ed.

Tide

Gua

ges

are

expe

cted

Apr

il 20

17 a

nd

cont

ract

aw

ard

for t

opog

raph

ic

surv

ey e

xpec

ted

April

201

7.

Appr

oxim

atel

y eq

ual n

umbe

r of

mal

es a

nd fe

mal

es p

artic

ipat

e.Ov

er 7

0% o

f the

nee

ds o

f vul

nera

ble

popu

latio

ns in

corp

orat

ed in

to th

e pr

ojec

t de

sign

and

impl

emen

tatio

n. T

he p

roje

ct

loca

tion

sele

ctio

n w

as a

dire

ct re

sult

of

the

vuln

erab

ilitie

s id

entif

ied.

6Op

en-s

ourc

e (s

patia

l dat

a) p

latfo

rm

deve

lopm

ent

74

88

Br

iefly

com

men

t on

each

sco

reIn

vita

tion

to Q

uote

sub

mitt

ed fo

r th

e pr

ocur

emen

t of U

PS b

ack-

up;

22 li

ne m

inis

trie

s co

nnec

ted

to

spat

ial d

ata

plat

form

.

Appr

oxim

atel

y 25

% o

f ac

tiviti

es re

late

d to

LiD

AR

com

plet

ed.

Tide

Gua

ges

are

expe

cted

Apr

il 20

17 a

nd

cont

ract

aw

ard

for t

opog

raph

ic

surv

ey e

xpec

ted

April

201

7.

Appr

oxim

atel

y eq

ual n

umbe

r of

mal

es a

nd fe

mal

es p

artic

ipat

e.Ov

er 7

0% o

f the

nee

ds o

f vul

nera

ble

popu

latio

ns in

corp

orat

ed in

to th

e pr

ojec

t de

sign

and

impl

emen

tatio

n. T

he p

roje

ct

loca

tion

sele

ctio

n w

as a

dire

ct re

sult

of

the

vuln

erab

ilitie

s id

entif

ied.

7Cl

imat

e ris

k an

alys

is re

flect

ed in

dr

aina

ge a

nd tr

ansp

ort i

nfra

stru

ctur

e de

sign

42

88

Br

iefly

com

men

t on

each

sco

reIn

dire

ct P

eak

Flow

Stu

dy

com

plet

ed; p

rese

ntat

ion

held

fo

r pub

lic a

nd p

rivat

e se

ctor

and

re

port

has

bee

n m

ade

avai

labl

e on

DVR

P w

ebsi

te.

LiDA

R ac

tiviti

es m

ust

be c

ompl

eted

prio

r to

com

men

cem

ent o

f thi

s ac

tivity

; dra

ft T

erm

s of

Re

fere

nce

prep

ared

.

Appr

oxim

atel

y eq

ual n

umbe

r of

mal

es a

nd fe

mal

es p

artic

ipat

e.Ov

er 7

0% o

f the

nee

ds o

f vul

nera

ble

popu

latio

ns in

corp

orat

ed in

to th

e pr

ojec

t de

sign

and

impl

emen

tatio

n. T

he p

roje

ct

loca

tion

sele

ctio

n w

as a

dire

ct re

sult

of

the

vuln

erab

ilitie

s id

entif

ied.

8Fo

rest

Inve

ntor

y2

28

8

Br

iefly

com

men

t on

each

sco

reTe

rms

of R

efer

ence

for

unde

rtak

ing

Fore

st In

vent

ory

draf

ted

and

subm

itted

to k

ey

stak

ehol

ders

for c

omm

ents

. Re

sear

ch c

ompl

eted

on

poss

ible

ex

pert

ise

in th

is a

rea.

Base

d re

sear

ch c

ompl

eted

for

the

repo

rtin

g pe

riod

and

the

draf

t ter

ms

of re

fenc

e, th

is

activ

ity is

abo

ut 2

5% c

ompl

ete.

Appr

oxim

atel

y eq

ual n

umbe

r of

mal

es a

nd fe

mal

es p

artic

ipat

e.Ov

er 7

0% o

f the

nee

ds o

f vul

nera

ble

popu

latio

ns in

corp

orat

ed in

to th

e pr

ojec

t de

sign

and

impl

emen

tatio

n T

he p

roje

ct

loca

tion

sele

ctio

n w

as a

dire

ct re

sult

of

the

vuln

erab

ilitie

s id

entif

ied.


9

Reha

bilit

atio

n of

For

estr

y Nu

rser

ies

- Exp

andi

ng fo

rest

nur

serie

s th

roug

h pl

ant p

rodu

ctio

n: fo

rest

spe

cies

, ag

ricul

ture

, hor

ticul

ture

(fru

its, e

tc.)

43

88

Br

iefly

com

men

t on

each

sco

reTh

e PC

U co

ntra

cted

a d

esig

n an

d su

perv

isio

n co

nsul

tant

fo

r the

Con

stru

ctio

n of

the

Fore

stry

Nur

serie

s. F

inal

des

igns

w

ere

rece

ived

dur

ing

the

last

qu

arte

r of 2

016.

Rev

iew

and

pr

iorit

izat

ion

of th

e de

taile

d de

sign

s ar

e on

goin

g.

The

inve

stm

ent h

as s

urpa

ssed

th

e or

igin

al s

cope

of w

orks

; th

is is

due

to th

e di

lapi

date

d st

ate

of th

e ex

istin

g st

ruct

ures

or

igin

ally

iden

tifie

d.

Appr

oxim

atel

y eq

ual n

umbe

r of

mal

es a

nd fe

mal

es p

artic

ipat

e.Ov

er 7

0% o

f the

nee

ds o

f vul

nera

ble

popu

latio

ns in

corp

orat

ed in

to th

e pr

ojec

t de

sign

and

impl

emen

tatio

n T

he p

roje

ct

loca

tion

sele

ctio

n w

as a

dire

ct re

sult

of

the

vuln

erab

ilitie

s id

entif

ied.

10In

stal

latio

n/de

velo

pmen

t of N

atio

nal

Hydr

omet

eoro

logy

Net

wor

k4

28

8

Br

iefly

com

men

t on

each

sco

reIn

Dec

embe

r 201

6, th

e PC

U co

ntra

cted

a H

ydro

met

Co

nsul

tant

for t

he D

esig

n an

d De

velo

pmen

t of T

echn

ical

Sp

ecifi

catio

ns fo

r the

Hyd

rom

et

Netw

ork.

Base

d on

the

Cons

ulta

nt's

in

augu

ral m

issi

on, t

he s

cope

of

the

proj

ect i

n te

rms

of th

e nu

mbe

r of w

eath

er s

tatio

ns

will

incr

ease

due

to v

ario

us

fact

ors

in th

e ne

twor

k de

sign

an

d to

pogr

aphy

.

Appr

oxim

atel

y eq

ual n

umbe

r of

mal

es a

nd fe

mal

es p

artic

ipat

e.Ov

er 7

0% o

f the

nee

ds o

f vul

nera

ble

popu

latio

ns in

corp

orat

ed in

to th

e pr

ojec

t de

sign

and

impl

emen

tatio

n T

he p

roje

ct

loca

tion

sele

ctio

n w

as a

dire

ct re

sult

of

the

vuln

erab

ilitie

s id

entif

ied.

11Na

tiona

l Soi

l Sur

vey

& M

appi

ng2

28

8

Br

iefly

com

men

t on

each

sco

reTh

e PC

U co

mm

ence

d pr

ocur

emen

t act

iviti

es to

war

ds

the

deve

lopm

ent o

f the

soi

ls

surv

ey. D

raft

ToR

s ha

ve b

een

deve

lope

d an

d po

rtab

le s

oil t

est

kits

bei

ng p

rocu

red.

The

PCU

antic

ipat

es th

at a

Co

nsul

tant

will

be

cont

ract

ed

in 2

017

to u

nder

take

the

Natio

nal S

oils

Sur

vey.

Thi

s ac

tivity

will

com

plem

ent

exis

ting

rela

ted

wor

ks b

eing

co

nduc

ted

by th

e Go

vern

men

t of

Dom

inic

a.

Appr

oxim

atel

y eq

ual n

umbe

r of

mal

es a

nd fe

mal

es p

artic

ipat

e.Ov

er 7

0% o

f the

nee

ds o

f vul

nera

ble

popu

latio

ns in

corp

orat

ed in

to th

e pr

ojec

t de

sign

and

impl

emen

tatio

n T

he p

roje

ct

loca

tion

sele

ctio

n w

as a

dire

ct re

sult

of

the

vuln

erab

ilitie

s id

entif

ied.

12De

velo

pmen

t of D

istr

ict C

limat

e Ad

apta

tion

Plan

s2

28

8

Br

iefly

com

men

t on

each

sco

reTh

e Te

rms

of R

efer

ence

hav

e be

en d

evel

oped

.Th

e PC

U w

ill p

roce

ed w

ith th

is

activ

ity o

nce

LiDA

R su

b-pr

ojec

t ha

ve b

een

com

plet

ed.

Appr

oxim

atel

y eq

ual n

umbe

r of

mal

es a

nd fe

mal

es p

artic

ipat

e.Ov

er 7

0% o

f the

nee

ds o

f vul

nera

ble

popu

latio

ns in

corp

orat

ed in

to th

e pr

ojec

t de

sign

and

impl

emen

tatio

n T

he p

roje

ct

loca

tion

sele

ctio

n w

as a

dire

ct re

sult

of

the

vuln

erab

ilitie

s id

entif

ied.

>> PPCR

SCO

RECA

RD 3

(CON

TINU

ED)

PROJ

ECT

TITL

ECl

imat

e re

spon

sive

inst

rum

ent/

inve

stm

ent m

odel

s id

entif

ied:

Has

the

inst

rum

ent/

in

vest

men

t mod

el b

een

deve

lope

d an

d te

sted

?

Has

the

inst

rum

ent/

in

vest

men

t mod

el b

een

impl

emen

ted

to th

e sc

ale

prop

osed

?

Has

the

inst

rum

ent/

inve

stm

ent

mod

el a

ppro

pria

tely

in

corp

orat

ed th

e ne

eds

of b

oth

fem

ales

and

mal

es in

to it

s de

sign

and

impl

emen

tatio

n?

Has

the

inst

rum

ent/

inve

stm

ent

mod

el in

corp

orat

ed th

e ne

eds

of

vuln

erab

le p

opul

atio

ns in

to it

s de

sign

an

d im

plem

enta

tion?

A#

BC

DE

F

ANNEXES

| 75 |

>> INST

RUCT

IONS

: 1.

List

all

clim

ate

resp

onsi

ve in

stru

men

ts/in

vest

men

t mod

els

iden

tifie

d in

eac

h of

you

r pro

ject

bef

ore

star

ting

(ref

er to

pro

ject

s do

cum

ents

). 2.

Est

ablis

h sc

orin

g cr

iteria

for e

ach

of th

e as

pect

s of

this

sco

reca

rd a

nd s

ubm

it th

em w

ith y

our r

epor

t. Th

is s

houl

d be

don

e on

ce, p

refe

rabl

y at

bas

elin

e st

age,

and

use

d du

ring

subs

eque

nt re

port

ing

year

s. 3.

If y

ou h

ave

prev

ious

ly e

stab

lishe

d yo

ur s

corin

g cr

iteria

, use

them

and

sub

mit

them

with

you

r rep

ort.

4.

Sco

re e

ach

cell

with

a s

core

bet

wee

n 0

and

10 (r

efer

to y

our s

corin

g cr

iteria

def

ined

for t

his

scor

ecar

d).

5. A

dd m

ore

lines

und

er e

ach

proj

ect i

f nee

ded.

LESS

ONS

LEAR

NED

Wha

t hav

e be

en th

e ke

y su

cces

ses

whe

n de

velo

ping

and

test

ing

thes

e in

stru

men

ts/in

vest

men

t mod

els?

1. In

test

ing

the

inve

stm

ent m

odel

s cr

eate

s ad

ditio

nal o

ppor

tuni

ties

whi

ch p

roba

bly

was

not

con

side

red

durin

g de

velo

pmen

t sta

ge. E

.g. t

he m

any

spin

-offs

ant

icip

ated

from

the

Natio

nal

Hydr

omet

eoro

logy

Net

wor

k.

2. D

isbu

rsem

ent o

f com

pute

r har

dwar

e an

d so

ftw

are

faci

litat

ed k

ey d

ata

colle

ctio

n ac

tiviti

es n

eede

d to

sup

port

oth

er p

roje

ct a

ctiv

ities

.

Wha

t hav

e be

en th

e ke

y ch

alle

nges

and

wha

t opp

ortu

nitie

s fo

r im

prov

emen

t do

you

see?

1. On

e of

the

key

chal

leng

es h

as b

een

the

unan

ticip

ated

am

ount

of t

ime

whi

ch is

ded

icat

ed to

pre

para

tory

act

iviti

es s

uch

as p

rocu

rem

ent o

f Con

sulta

nts,

Good

s et

c.

2. In

term

s of

infr

astr

uctu

ral w

orks

, one

maj

or c

halle

nge

has

been

the

finan

cial

requ

irem

ents

for s

mal

l firm

s in

kee

ping

with

the

Wor

ld B

ank’s

Pro

cedu

res;

ther

e se

em to

be

a di

scon

nect

be

twee

n th

e ec

onom

ic re

ality

of s

mal

l isl

and

stat

es a

nd d

onor

s pr

oced

ures

.

3. O

ne o

ppor

tuni

ty w

hich

has

bee

n cr

eate

d is

cap

acity

bui

ldin

g am

ong

smal

l firm

s to

com

pete

on

dono

r-fu

nded

pro

ject

s.

| 76 |

Annex 8 SCORING WORKSHOP SUMMARY FORM

SUMMARY OF THE SCORING WORKSHOPWho were the different stakeholder groups invited to the scoring workshop (composition and number)? Please attach the list of participants.

How did you define your scoring criteria for Scorcards 1 and 2 (national level) and Scorecard 3 (project level)? Please attach scoring criteria for scorcards 1, 2, and 3.

Please provide a brief summary of the workshop. What were the key issues raised during the workshop?

Have you shared the results of the scoring workshop to a wider in-country stakeholder group (e.g., an annual multi-stakeholder national-level steering committee and/or stock-taking meeting on the implementation of the SPCR)?

www.climateinvestmentfunds.org

PPC

R M

ON

ITO

RIN

G A

ND R

EPO

RTIN

G T

OO

LK

IT

ppcr monitoring and reporting toolkit - …...climate responsive instruments/ investment models are...

Documents