powerpoint presentation · ppt file · web view2014-11-10 · regional trade agreements a global...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Shri T.C. VENKAT SUBRAMANIANChairman & Managing Director
Exim Bank of IndiaChennai, February 19, 2005
Regional Trade AgreementsA Global Perspective
2
Global Trade : Developed vs DevelopingGlobal Trade : Developed vs Developing
Increasing Importance of Developing Countries…but only in Merchandise Trade
Source: ITS 2004, WTOSource: ITS 2004, WTO
1993 2003 1993 2003Global Merchandise Exports 3777.1 7502.9 100.0 100.0 Advanced Countries ( 29 ) 2876.8 5375.8 76.2 71.6 Developing Countries ( 174 ) 900.3 2127.1 23.8 28.4
VALUE (US$ bn) SHARE (%)
1993 2003 1993 2003Global Services Exports 940.6 1796.4 100.0 100.0 Advanced Countries ( 29 ) 749.7 1451.7 79.7 80.8 Developing Countries ( 174 ) 190.9 344.7 20.3 19.2
VALUE (US$ bn) SHARE (%)
3
Global Trade : Major Global Trade : Major CountriesCountries
Top 10 Global Merchandise Exporters and Importers (2003)
724
1303
748
602
472
383
438
413
387
391
305
391
292
291
294
263
273
245
255
235
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
USA Germany Japan China France UK Italy N'lands Canada Belgium
IMPORTSIMPORTS
EXPORTSEXPORTS
US$ billionUS$ billion
Source: ITS 2004, WTOSource: ITS 2004, WTO
Total Exports : US$ 7503 bn (incl. re-exports)Total Exports : US$ 7503 bn (incl. re-exports)Total Imports : US$ 7778 bn (incl. Imports for re-export)Total Imports : US$ 7778 bn (incl. Imports for re-export)
4
… superset of all RTAs
World Trade Organisation World Trade Organisation (WTO)(WTO)
The WTO is ‘member-driven’, with decisions taken by consensus among all member governments
Any state or customs territory having full autonomy in the conduct of its trade policies may join (“accede to”) the WTO. The following process is involved : Commencement of the accessions process
Working party and the fact-finding process
Bilateral negotiations
Report, Protocol of Accession and Entry into Force
As on December 2004, there were 148 WTO members
26 Countries negotiating membership (WTO “observers”) including Russia, Vietnam, Algeria, Saudi Arabia, Bhutan and Sudan
5
Liberalising trade on a reciprocal & preferential basis
Regional Trade AgreementsRegional Trade Agreements
RTA encompasses both reciprocal bilateral free trade or customs areas and multi-country (plurilateral) agreements
Regional and bilateral trade agreements provide for one type of trade liberalization
While programs such as the U.S. African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA) and the EU’s Everything But Arms (EBA) also liberalize trade preferentially, the United States and EU extend these preferences unilaterally rather than reciprocally
Countries often lower trade barriers in a nondiscriminatory fashion for all trade partners either multilaterally through GATT/WTO negotiating rounds or autonomously
6
Classification of liberalisation methods
Regional Trade AgreementsRegional Trade Agreements
METHOD OF IMPLEMENTATION
Scope of Beneficiaries Reciprocal Unilateral
Preferential: Select Countries
NAFTA, EU, COMESA and other RTAs
AGOA, EBA, Cotonou
Nondiscriminatory (MFN): All Countries
GATT/WTO Multilateral Agreements
Autonomous Liberalisation
7
RTAs & Types of LiberalisationRTAs & Types of Liberalisation
RTAs divided into several basic categories according to the degree of
economic integration they provide: Free Trade Area: members eliminate barriers to trade in goods (and increasingly
services) among members, but each member is free to maintain different MFN barriers on nonmembers
Customs Union: moves beyond a free trade area by establishing a common external tariff on all trade between members and nonmembers
Common Market: deepens a customs union by providing for the free flow of factors of production (labor and capital) in addition to the free flow of outputs
Economic & Monetary Union: members share a common currency and macroeconomic policies
RTAs : Four Major Levels of Integration
8
Regional Trading ArrangementsRegional Trading Arrangements
Sharp proliferation in Regional Trading Agreements (RTAs) in recent years
The number of these agreements has more than quadrupled since 1990, rising to
around 230 by late 2004
Nearly all countries belong to at least one RTA
As of July 2003, only 3 WTO members, viz. Macau China, Mongolia and Chinese
Taipei were not party to any RTA
Trade between RTA partners now makes up nearly 40% of total global trade
Members of RTAs liberalize trade on a reciprocal and preferential basis
RTAs can create trade and bring other benefits for members … but results are
not automatic and depend critically on design
RTAs: Increasing Proliferation…
Contd…Contd…
9
Regional Trading ArrangementsRegional Trading Arrangements
… Particularly in the Last Decade
229
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
1958 1969 1976 1984 1989 1994 1999 20040
50
100
150
200
250
300
Source: Global Economic Prospects 2005, World BankSource: Global Economic Prospects 2005, World Bank
Cumulative in force (right axis)
Annual number Total in force
Not Notified to WTO
Notified to WTO
10
Most countries belong to more than one RTA
Regional Trading ArrangementsRegional Trading Arrangements
East Asia & Pacific
Europe & Central
Asia
LAC MENA South Asia
Sub Sharan Africa
North* TOTAL
Number of countries 32 36 39 21 8 48 25 209
Countries belonging to at least one RTA 4 12 6 10 0 2 10 44Average number of RTAs per country 2 1 2 1 1 4 2Maximum number of RTAs per country 4 4 4 3 0 1 24 24
Countries belonging to at least one RTA 24 22 33 20 8 47 10 164Average number of RTAs per country 2 6 8 5 4 4 8 5Maximum number of RTAs per country 3 12 17 12 9 9 15 17
Countries belonging to at least one RTA 26 26 35 20 8 48 11 174Average number of RTAs per country 2 6 8 5 4 4 11 5Maximum number of RTAs per country 7 12 19 13 9 9 29 29
North-South Bilateral*
All Others
Total
Note: Bilateral agreements are defined as an RTA with two members. Note: Bilateral agreements are defined as an RTA with two members. * North is OECD 24 plus Liechtenstein and South is all other countries* North is OECD 24 plus Liechtenstein and South is all other countries
11
Percent of World Trade CoveredPercent of World Trade CoveredNumber of RTAsNumber of RTAs
7 9130.3
10
13
3
5
5
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
1990 1996 20026 18 32
436
108
193
13
0
50
100
150
200
250
1990 1996 2002
South-South-SouthSouth
European European UnionUnion
USAUSA
South-South
European European UnionUnion
USAUSA
South-South RTAs predominate in number… …but not in trade covered
Source: Global Economic Prospects 2005, World BankSource: Global Economic Prospects 2005, World Bank
Regional Trading ArrangementsRegional Trading Arrangements
12
Regional Trading ArrangementsRegional Trading Arrangements
Intra-Regional Trade of Major RTAs, 1995, 2000 & 2003
Value (US$ bn)
RTA 2003 1995 2000 2003 1995 2000 2003 1995 2000 2003
EU (15) 1795 26.6 23.1 24.6 64.0 62.4 61.9 65.2 60.3 61.7NAFTA (3) 651 7.9 10.9 8.9 46.0 55.7 56.1 37.7 39.6 36.8ASEAN (10) 105 1.6 1.6 1.4 25.5 24.0 23.3 18.8 23.5 23.3CEFTA (8) 29 0.3 0.3 0.4 16.2 13.0 13.6 12.3 10.2 11.3MERCOSUR (4) 13 0.3 0.3 0.2 20.5 21.0 11.9 18.1 19.8 19.0ANDEAN (5) 5 0.1 0.1 0.1 12.2 8.9 9.4 12.9 13.8 14.7
Total 2598 36.7 36.2 35.6 - - - - - -
Share in world exports(%)
SHARE OF INTRA-TRADE INExports
(%)Imports
(%)
INTRA-TRADE
Source: International Trade Statistics, 2004, WTOSource: International Trade Statistics, 2004, WTO
13
HIGH-INCOME COUNTRIES SUCH AS US & EU To support foreign policy goals, including development Slow progress on multilateral agenda: “competitive liberalization” Access to services markets, protection of intellectual property, and rules for
investment
DEVELOPING COUNTRIES Secure access to markets, especially large markets More FDI Among neighbors, lowering trade cost at border Framework for regional cooperation
Why This Proliferation?
Regional Trading ArrangementsRegional Trading Arrangements
14
Regional Trading ArrangementsRegional Trading Arrangements
High Income Countries Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) European Union (EU) North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA)
LAC Region Andean Group Central American Common Market (CACM) Caribbean Community and Common Market (CARICOM) Latin American Integration Association (LAIA) Southern Cone Common Market (MERCOSUR)
Major RTAs in Select Regions
15
Regional Trading ArrangementsRegional Trading Arrangements
Africa Common Market for Eastern & Southern Africa (COMESA)
Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS)
Southern African Development Community (SADC)
West African Economic and Monetary Union (WAEMU)
Asia Association of South-East Asian Nations Free Trade Area (AFTA)
Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC)
South Asian Free Trade Area (SAFTA)
Major RTAs in Select Regions (contd…)
16
Regional Trading Regional Trading ArrangementsArrangements
Many RTAs can complicate administrative procedures Growing number of
overlapping agree-ments
Emergence of “spaghetti bowl” due to proliferation of bilateral agreements
The associated myriad of rules strains institutions charged with administering trade agreements.
Spaghetti Bowl of RTAs in the Americas and Asia-Pacific
17
Regional Trading ArrangementsRegional Trading Arrangements
RTAs can have positive or negative effects on trade depending on their design and implementation
Gains from a preferential trade agreement cannot be taken for granted
Even in agreements with positive impacts on average incomes, not all members are assured of increases
The policy question then is not whether RTAs are categorically good or bad, but what determines their success
Agreements that have been designed to complement a general program of economic reform have been most effective in raising trade When RTAs have tended to be fruitless, it is often because of the lack of a coherent
program of reform
Effects on trade
18
Regional Trading ArrangementsRegional Trading Arrangements
RTAs can be a complement to multilateral reform, but they are not a substitute
From a development perspective, the WTO remains the best-available forum to
discipline the use of trade-distorting policies
RTAs can complement the WTO efforts by cooperating on behind-the-border policies,
especially on regulation-intensive issues such as services, trade facilitation, and the
investment climate
Large developed countries may gain more from signing individual bilateral
agreements than they would from a multilateral accord
They can use preferential access to extract concessions in non-trade areas from
developing country partners that would be resisted in the WTO negotiating framework
Making Regionalism Complementary to Multilateralism
19
Regional Trading ArrangementsRegional Trading Arrangements
Most development friendly outcome is associated with global reform
Bilateral Agreements vs. Global Trade Reform (change in real income in 2015 compared to 2001)
Regions Global Bilateral with Quad
Global Bilateral with Quad
High-income countries 154.4 133.6 0.6 0.5Low-income countries 16.6 -19.0 0.9 -1.0Middle-income countries 92.2 -2.6 1.2 0.0All developing countries 108.8 -21.5 1.2 -0.2World Total 263.2 112.0 0.8 0.3
US$ billion Percent
Source: World Bank SimulationsSource: World Bank Simulations
20
Regional Trading ArrangementsRegional Trading Arrangements
Framework Agreement on Comprehensive Economic Cooperation with ASEAN
Bay of Bengal Initiative for Multi-Sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation (BIMSTEC) FTA
India – Singapore Comprehensive Economic Cooperation Agreement
Framework Agreement for establishing Free Trade between India and Thailand
India – Sri Lanka Bilateral Free Trade Area
Agreement on South Asian Free Trade Area (SAFTA)
India – Mercosur PTA
India – Southern African Customs Union (SACU) Framework Agreement
India – Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) Framework Agreement
Regional Trade Agreements : India’s Initiatives
21
Regional Trading ArrangementsRegional Trading Arrangements
The government has decided to convert all preferential/free trade agreements into Comprehensive Economic Cooperation Agreements (CECA). PTAs/FTAs usually involve structured reduction in tariffs between two countries.
CECAs would cover preferential relaxation of FDI rules vis-à-vis the partner country, tax holidays on investment and income, easing of visa restrictions, trade in services.
The proposed FTAs/PTAs with Thailand, Mercosur & ASEAN to be made CECAs This has already been done with Sri Lanka.
PTA with the SACU would be merged with a new CECA with South Africa
The agreements with Singapore and GCC is also envisaged to be a CECA
Other proposed alliances with Russia, China and Israel would also be CECAs, rather than mere FTAs
RTAs : India’s Initiatives (contd…)