Kentland

LakeVillage

Roselawn

Kentland

Brook

Morocco

MountAyr

Goodland£¤24

¬«71

¬«55

¬«55

¬«16

¬«14

¬«114

¬«10

§̈¦65

CR 400 E

CR 300 E

CR 1075 S

CR 275 W

CR 350 E

CR 1275 S

CR 625 S

CR 500 W

CR 100 E

CR 650 W

CR 400 E

CR 300 S

CR 125 W

CR 200 W

CR 150 E

CR 300 E

CR 200 E

CR 575 E

CR 1000 S

CR 325 S

CR 350 W

CR 600 N

CR 300 S

CR 550 E

CR 50 E

CR 450 W

CR 525 W

CR 500 S

CR 500 E

CR 1300 S

CR 300 W

CR 500 W

CR 1400 S

CR 300 N

CR 225 S

CR 100 S

CR 550 E

CR 1200 S

CR 700 N

CR 900 N

CR 100 W

CR 250 E

CR 1300 S

CR 200 S

CR 450 S

CR 400 E

CR 350 E

CR 700 S

CR 600 S

CR 200 E

CR 350 W

CR 700 N

CR 400 E

CR 100 W

CR 1550 S

CR 150 W

CR 500 E

CR 700 S

CR 300 NCR 200 E

CR 400 E

CR 1500 S

CR 400 N

CR 1150 S

CR 400 W

CR 525 W

CR 600 W

CR 800 S CR 800 S

CR 350 S

CR 500 S

CR 525 E

CR 800 N

CR 1700 S

CR 250 W

CR 600 W

CR 150 E

CR 1400 S

CR 600 N

CR 400 W

CR 500 W

CR 600 E

CR 175 E

CR 750 S

CR 600 W

CR 675 W

CR 250 N

CR 100 WCR 650 W

CR 950 N

CR 1100 N

CR 900 S

CR 600 S

CR 50 S

CR 575 W

CR 300 W

CR 1100 S

CR 300 W

CR 200 W

CR 150 E

CR 100 E

CR 50 W

CR 200 E

CR 250 W

CR 1200 N

CR 475 W

CR 950 N

CR 1000 S

CR 75 W

CR 1200 S

Bowe

r Ditc

h

Moran

Montgomery

Cline Ditch

Bowt

onDi

tch

Jones

Darroch

Carls

on D

itch

Chizum Ditch

O'Brien

Riner H

ousew

orth D

itch

Beaver Lake Ditch

Strole Ditch

Salis

bury

Di

tch

-

Rich Ditch

Shuey

Dit ch

Ditch

D

i tc h

Garrard

Iroquois

Kankakee River

Ditch

Templeton

Talley Ditch

Curti

sCree

k

Elijah Ditch

Narrows Ditch

David Ditch

Kasta

Spitler Ditch

Kankakee R

iver

Best

Ditch

Barten

131415161718131415

29 28 2627 25

161714 1813

302526272829302526

3635343332313635343332313635

1211

2120 22 2423

109

871211109871211

2526272829302526

4 35 2 1612345

272829302526

612

32 33 3534

36313635

24232221201924

2322

343332313635

2120192423

24

32

36

31

353433

21 232224 2019232221201924

1318 17

27

2526

363534333231

1613 1415141516171813

2 1345612

36353433323136

127

24

34561

8 912 1110111098

712

23

252829 26

5 4 1236

12

273025262728

293025

36 451

2124 2019

3635

34

33323136353433323136

1211109871211

123

131415

1098712

456123

1617181314

45612

1516171813

25262728293025262728293025

3635

1211

16

343332313635

10987121110

3433323136

98712

2423222120

192423222123 24 2019

19242320 22211924

17 15 1314181314151617181314

25262728293025262728293025

1234561234561

13141516171813141516

171813

1098

121171211109

2423

22

871211

2120192423

22

Defries

Otis

Boyle Ditch

Lawler Ditch

Thompso

n Ditch

River

BairdDitch

Ditch

Weiss

Ditch

Camblin

Haines

Ditch

Deardurff Ditch

R. 8 W . R. 7 W .

T. 32 N.T. 31 N.

T. 31 N.T. 30 N.

T. 30 N.T. 29 N.

T. 29 N.T. 28 N.

T. 28 N.T. 27 N.

T. 27 N.T. 26 N.

R. 8 W . R. 7 W .R. 9 W . R. 8 W .

T. 27 N.T. 26 N.

R. 10 W . R. 9 W .

T. 30 N.T. 29 N.

T. 28 N.T. 27 N.

T. 29 N.T. 28 N.

T. 31 N.T. 30 N.

R. 10 W . R. 9 W .T. 32 N.T. 31 N.

R. 9 W . R. 8 W .

650

630

660

670

660

660

670

650

640

630

640

650

650640

640630

650

640

630

Deardu rf fDitch

Sheep Ditch

BeaverCreek

Bergren Ditch

Lawl

er

650

640

670680

690700

Ditch

650

Ditch

640630

700 710

720 730

660

Ditch

Ditch

Ditch

Ditch

Gregory

650

640

630

Sumava Resorts

Thayer

Enos

Ade

Effner

Foresman

BeaverCity

Ditch

Willow SloughState Fish &Wildlife Area

Carlson GamebirdHabitat Area

Clarence TriplettGamebird

Habitat Area

Conrad SavannaNature Preserve

Lasalle State Fish& Wildlife Area

£¤41

£¤41

£¤41

¬«10

¬«55

Ditch Ditch

Battle

day

Ditch

Bogus Island Ditch

River

Iroqu

ois

Prudential Gamebird

Habitat Area

Lyons GamebirdHabitat Area

DonohueGamebird

HabitatArea

740

£¤24

¬«55

620

620

640

J.C. Murphey Lake

620

¬«14

Johnson Ditch

POTENTIOM ETRIC SU RFACE M AP OF THE BEDROCK AQU IFERS OF NEW TON COU NTY, INDIANA

Division of W ater

M ichae l R. Penc e, GovernorDe p artm e nt of Natural ResourcesCam eron F. Clark, Dire ctor Pote ntiom etric Surface M ap 51-B

Map Use and Disclaimer Statement

W e request that the following age ncy b e acknowle d ge d in prod ucts d erive d from this m ap : Ind iana De p artm e nt of Natural Resources, Division of W ater.This m ap was com p ile d b y staff of the Ind iana De p artm e nt of Natural Resources, Division of W ater using d ata b e lieve d to b e reasonab ly accurate. However, a d e gre e of error is inhere nt in all m aps. This prod uct is d istrib ute d “as is” without warranties of any kind , e ither exp resse d or im p lie d . This m ap is inte nd e d for use only at the pub lishe d scale.

This m ap is create d from several existing shap e files. Township and Range Lines of Ind iana (line shap e file, 20020621), Land Survey Lines of Ind iana (p olygon shap e file, 20020621), and County Bound aries of Ind iana (p olygon shap e file, 20020621), are all from the Ind iana Ge ological Survey and b ase d on a 1:24,000 scale. Road s (TIGER and INDOT) (line shap e file, 2005) is from the Ind iana De p artm e nt of Transp ortation and b ase d on a 1:100,000 scale. Syste m 1 (line shap e file, 2003) is from the Ind iana De p artm e nt of Transp ortation and b ase d on a 1:24,000 scale. Incorp orate d Bound aries in Ind iana (p olygon shap e file, 20060501) is from the Grap hics and Engine ering Se ction, Ind iana De p artm e nt of Transp ortation. Hyd rograp hy, Stream s (NHD) (line shap e file, 20081218), Rivers (NHD) (p olygon shap e file, 20081218), and Lakes (NHD) (p olygon shap e file, 20081218) are from the U .S. Geological Surveyand b ase d on a 1:24,000 scale. M anage d Land s IDNR IN (p olygon shap e file, 20100920) is from the Ind iana De p artm e nt of Natural Resources and b ase d on a 1:24,000 scale. Digital Elevation M od e l im age is d erive d from the Ind iana Ortho/LiDAR Statewid e Colle ction Program (2013). Newton County Be d rock No Aquifer M aterial or Lim ite d Data (p olygon shap e file, Grove, 2015) and Pote ntiom etric Surface Contours of the Be d rock Aquifers of Newton County, Ind iana (line shap e file, Grove, 2015) are b ase d on a 1:24,000 scale.

M ap ge nerate d b y Reub e n Q. ArvinIDNR, Division of W ater, Resource Assessm e nt Se ction

Elevation (feet)885

528

Digital Elevation Model of Newton County, Indiana

1 0 10.5 M ile

1 0 10.5 Kilom eter

Location Map

Potentiometric Surface Map of the BedrockAquifers of Newton County, Indiana

b yGle nn E. Grove

Division of W ater, Resource Assessm e nt Se ction

M arch 2015

State M anage d Prop erty

EXPLANATION

Lake & River

M unicip al Bound ary

State Road

County RoadStream

Interstate

Line of equal e levation, in fe et ab ove m ean sea leve lPote ntiom etric Contour interval 10 fe et

700

U S Highway¬«14

£¤41

§̈¦65

No Aquifer M aterialor Lim ite d Data

Newton County is locate d in the northwest p ortion of Ind iana, ad jace nt to the state of Illinois to the west, and is b ound e d b y the counties of Lake, Jasp er, and Be nton. The e ntire county lies within the Kankake e River Basin.The Pote ntiom etric Surface M ap (PSM ) of the b e d rock aquifers of Newton County was m ap p e d b y contouring the e levations of 287 static water-leve ls re p orte d on we ll re cord s re ce ive d prim arily over a 50 year p eriod . These we lls are com p lete d in aquifers at various d e p ths, and typ ically, und er confine d cond itions (b ound e d b y im p erm eab le layers ab ove and b e low the water b earing form ation). However, som e we lls were com p lete d und er unconfine d (not b ound e d b y im p erm eab le layers) settings. The p ote ntiom etric surface is a m easure of the pressure on water in a water b earing form ation. W ater in an unconfine d aquifer is at atm osp heric pressure and will not rise in a we ll ab ove the top of the aquifer, in contrast to ground water in a confine d aquifer which is und er hyd rostatic pressure and will rise in a we ll ab ove the top of the water b earing form ation.

U niversal Transverse M ercator (U TM ) coord inates for the water we lls were e ither p hysically ob taine d in the fie ld , d eterm ine d through ad d ress ge ocod ing, or re p orte d on water we ll re cord s. The location of the m ajority of the water we ll re cord s use d to m ake the PSM were fie ld verifie d . Elevation d ata were ob taine d from a d igital e levation m od e l. Quality control/quality assurance proce d ures were utilize d to re fine or rem ove d ata where errors were read ily ap p are nt.Pote ntiom etric surface e levations range from a high of 740 fe et m ean sea leve l (m sl) in the southeast p ortion of the county, to a low of 620 fe et m sl along the northwest corner, west-ce ntral e d ge, and southwest areas of the county. Ground water flow d ire ction is toward s the Kankake e River in the northern part of the county, toward s the Iroquois River in the southern area, with an overall western trend in the ce ntral p ortion of the county.Be d rock p ote ntiom etric surface e levation contours have not b e e n exte nd e d through p ortions of the county. These areas are lacking in d ata and /or covere d b y m ore prolific unconsolid ate d d e p osits that lim it the ne c essity to com p lete we lls in b e d rock.

Static water-leve l m easure m e nts in ind ivid ual we lls use d to construct county PSM ’s are ind icative of the water-leve l at the tim e of we ll com p letion. The ground water leve l within an aquifer constantly fluctuates in resp onse to rainfall, evap otransp iration, ground water m ove m e nt and pum p age. There fore, m easure d static water-leve ls in an area m ay d iffer d ue to local or seasonal variations. Be cause fluctuations in ground water are typ ically sm all, static water-leve ls can b e use d to construct a ge neralize d PSM . As a ge neral rule, b ut certainly not always, ground water flow ap p roxim ates the overlying top ograp hy and interse cts the land surface at m ajor stream s.

The county PSM can b e use d to d e fine the re gional ground water flow path and to id e ntify significant areas of ground water re charge and d ischarge. County PSM ’s re p rese nt overall regional characteristics and are not inte nd e d to b e a sub stitute for site-sp e cific stud ies.