postpartum hemorrhage prevention and management: · pdf file[fact sheet] geneva ... final...

13
Postpartum Hemorrhage Prevention and Management: Quality of Care in Madagascar Jean Pierre Rakotovao (MCHIP Chief of Party), Eva Bazant (Sr. Monitoring, Evaluation and Research Advisor), Vandana Tripathi (Consultant, Jhpiego), Justin Ranjalahy Rasolofomanana (Professor of Higher Learning and Public Health Research)

Upload: trinhnhi

Post on 09-Mar-2018

219 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Postpartum Hemorrhage Prevention and Management: Quality of Care in Madagascar

• Jean Pierre Rakotovao (MCHIP Chief of Party), • Eva Bazant (Sr. Monitoring, Evaluation and Research Advisor), • Vandana Tripathi (Consultant, Jhpiego), • Justin Ranjalahy Rasolofomanana (Professor of Higher Learning and

Public Health Research)

Introduction

This assessment provides the first data regarding quality of actual PPH-related practices in Madagascar

This analysis focuses on facility readiness, provider knowledge, and interventions related to postpartum hemorrhage (PPH).

Context

Population: 20 M DHS IV 2008

TFR: 4.8 CPR : 40% /Modern method: 29% ANC: 86% at least one MMR: 498 deaths per 100000 live births Home delivery: 64 %

EMONC survey 2010 Major causes of maternal death

• Hemorrhage : 38.89% • Prolonged labor: 22. 22 %PE/E • Infection: 20.37% • PE/E: 14.81%

Objective

To provide information on quality of prevention and management interventions in facility-based care that address maternal complications.

Materials and Methods

A cross-sectional national assessment in facilities with higher caseload of birth (>2 per day).

Descriptive statistical analysis was conducted Inventories : 36 facilities Interview : 139 providers, largely midwives, Observations : 347 labor & delivery (L&D) cases

occurred mostly in hospitals, of which 84% ended in the spontaneous vaginal delivery.

Data from observation of each of 15 suspected PPH cases was reviewed.

Results (1) Inventory

Injectable uterotonics were available in 78% of facilities,

Equipment and supplies (e.g., syringes, suture material) were less available (42-61%).

Half of facilities had items needed for removal of retained placenta.

L&D guidelines were observed in only 2 facilities, and guidelines for emergency obstetric care in only 4, among the 9 where PPH cases occurred

Characteristic N=36 Facilities

Injectable uterotonic 78% Syringes & needles 61% IV infusion set 56% Suture material & needles

42%

MVA or D&C kit 50%

Results (2)

Providers knowledge Mean score to

assess signs for PPH : 56%.

Few knew how to assess for atonic uterus (mean score 39%) or knew the steps in managing retained placenta (36%).

Results (3) PPH cases observed

Among suspected PPH cases, a uterotonic (oxytocin was available in all these cases ) was administered in AMTSL in only 4 of 8 cases where the patient delivered at the facility;

Uterine massage and controlled cord traction were not performed in most cases.

Results (4)

Cases observed Oxytocin was given

during active management of the 3rd stage of labor (AMTSL) in 85% of cases; however, only 13% of observations were fully compliant with AMTSL steps

AMTSL interventions performed* (n=8) Number of cases

Administration of uterotonic 4 Controlled cord traction 3 Uterine massage 3 All AMTSL interventions 2

Results (5)

Cases observed A uterotonic was

administered for treatment in only 4 of 15 PPH cases.

Manual removal of placenta was attempted in 5 cases, but not performed correctly.

Type of treatment provided Number of cases

Administration of uterotonic 4 Massage fundus 5 Repair of lacerations 2 Manual removal of placenta 5 Bimanual compression -- Blood transfusion 0 Surgery 3 Outcome Maternal deaths 0 Perinatal deaths 4**

Conclusions

AMTSL and PPH management were not adequate even when drugs were available or special equipment was not required.

Providers need more support to ensure complete provision of AMTSL and correct PPH management and improved PPH knowledge and skills.

Recommendations include visible job aids at each facility, and sustained training and regular supervision of providers.

AMTSL should be incorporated into national service delivery guidelines.

Bibliography 1. Institut National de la Statistique (INSTAT) et ICF Macro. 2010. Enquête Démographique et de Santé de

Madagascar 2008-2009. [Demographic and Health Survey 2008–2009. In French.] Antananarivo, Madagascar: INSTAT et ICF Macro.

2. Khan S, Wojdyla D, Say L, Gulmezoglu AM, Van Look PA. 2006. WHO Analysis of causes of maternal death: a systematic review. Lancet 2006; 367: 1066–74.

3. World Health Organization, Department of Reproductive Health and Research. 2011. Proportion of births attended by a skilled health worker 2008 updates. [Fact Sheet] Geneva, Switzerland: WHO.

4. http://www.pphprevention.org/Surveytools.php. 5. Stanton C, Armbruster D, Knight R et al. 2009. Use of active management of the third stage of labour in seven

developing countries. Bull World Health Organ 87:207–15. 6. Averting Death and Disability, Columbia University (AMDD). 2010. Needs Assessment of Emergency Obstetric

and Newborn Care. Data Collector’s Manual. AMDD: New York, NY. 7. National Coordinating Agency for Population and Development (NCAPD) [Kenya], Ministry of Medical Services

(MOMS) [Kenya], Ministry of Public Health and Sanitation (MOPHS) [Kenya], Kenya National Bureau of Statistics (KNBS) [Kenya], ICF Macro. 2011. Kenya Service Provision Assessment Survey 2010. Nairobi, Kenya: National Coordinating Agency for Population and Development, Ministry of Medical Services, Ministry of Public Health and Sanitation, Kenya National Bureau of Statistics, and ICF Macro.

8. Population Reference Bureau. 2011. The World’s Women and Girls, 2011 Data Sheet. Washington DC: PRB. 9. Institut National de la Statistique (INSTAT) et ICF Macro. 2010. Enquête Démographique et de Santé de

Madagascar 2008-2009. [Demographic and Health Survey 2008-2009. In French.] Antananarivo, Madagascar: INSTAT et ICF Macro.

12

Bibliography

13

10. World Health Organization. 2010. Trends in Maternal Mortality: 1990 to 2008. Estimates developed by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, and the World Bank. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO.

11. Vice Primature Charge de Sante Publique, UNFPA, UNICEF, World Health Organization, AMDD, and MSIS. 2010. Evaluation des besoins en matiere de soins obstetricaux et neonatals d’’urgence à Madagascar, Rapport final, Mars 2010. [Needs assessment for emergency obstetric and neonatal care in Madagascar, Final report in French, March 2010.] UNFPA. Antananarivo, Madagascar.

12. Fujioka A, Smith J. 2011. Prevention and Management of Postpartum Hemorrhage and Pre-Eclampsia/Eclampsia: National Programs in Selected USAID Program-Supported Countries. USAID/MCHIP. Accessed August 29, 2011 from http://www.mchip.net/sites/default/files/mchipfiles/PPH_PEE%20Program%20Status%20Report.pdf.

13. World Health Organization. 2006. Pregnancy, Childbirth, Postpartum and Newborn Care: A Guide for Essential Practice, Integrated Management of Pregnancy and Childbirth Toolkit. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO.

14. World Health Organization. 2003. Managing Complications in Pregnancy and Childbirth: A Guide for Midwives and Doctors. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO.

15. Institut National De La Statistique (Instat) et ICF Macro. 2010. Enquête Démographique Et De Santé De Madagascar 2008-2009. Antananarivo, Madagascar: Instat et ICF Macro.

16. MCHIP, Jhpiego Et Tandem. 2010. Rapport de Mise En Œuvre. Evaluation de la Qualité de Service pour la Prévention, L’identification et la Prise en Charge des Complications Courantes Maternelles et Neonatales. [Report on the Implementation. Evaluation of quality of Care for the Prevention, Identification, and Management of Common Maternal and Newborn Complications. In French.] : MCHIP/Jhpiego/Tandem.