poster_final version
TRANSCRIPT
Differential response to matrix rigidity correlates with aggressive phenotype of breast cancer cells Ji Li, Yang Wu, Mohammad Ali Al-Ameen, and Gargi Ghosh
Department of Mechanical Engineering Rackham Graduate School
University of Michigan - Dearborn Introduc*on As a major component of tumor microenvironment, extracellular matrix (ECM) is believed to play an important role in cancer metastasis. Breast cancer is the second leading cause of cancer mortality in women, with the vast majority of the deaths resulting from metastatic tumors. As the compliance of the stroma within breast carcinomas is approximately 5-20 times more rigid than normal breast tissue, it has recently been postulated that local changes in matrix elasticity contribute significantly to the progression of the disease. However, it is unclear whether restoration of ECM elasticity to normal levels may benefit treatment prognosis. Such an understanding would require a systematic characterization of how cells sense and integrate abnormal ECM dynamics. Here, we report the fabrication and characterization of poly (ethylene glycol) (PEG) based hydrogel matrices of varying stiffness. These matrices were then utilized to investigate cell-material interactions in the context of matrix stiffening.
Materials and Methods
Fabricate scaffold § The pre-polymer solution, consisting of 10% PEG6kDA, 1% photo-initiator, and
5% gelatin methacrylate. § Polymer matrix is made by exposure under UV light for multiple time, 2.5 min, 4
min and 6 min. § Seeding non-treated MDA-MB-231 and treated cells on the matrixes and
incubated in 37℃ for 3 days. Compression test • Incubate 3 mm thickness scaffolds in 1XPBS for 72 hrs after fabricated • Carry out the compressive test data by using uniaxial testing machine at a loading
rate of 1.2 mm/min with a precision load up to 9 N • Record the maximum strain and stress and calculate Young’s modulus from the
initial 10% compression
Cell Treatment • Aspirate old media form flask • Incubate cells with 5ml 10µM Y-27832(ROCK) of fresh media in 37℃ for 3hrs Morphology § Cell area and aspect ratio (Width of cell/length of cell) is measured by AxioVision
Rel. 4.8 software Proliferation § Aspirate old medium form each well and inject with 100µm fresh medium and
50µm activated-XTT solution which is made with 0.1ml activation reagent and 5ml XTT reagent.
§ Return the plate to the cell culture CO2 incubator for 5 hrs. § Measure the absorbance of the wells containing the cells and the blank
background control wells at a wavelength between 475 nm using a microtiter plate reader.
Adhesion • Seed 10K per well of cells on each matrix and incubate for 17hrs • Wash the matrix by fresh medium three times • Count the number of cell remaining on the scaffolds.
Protein Assay • Add 5% Phalloidin solution on each matrix with fixed cells and put plate on shaker
with 37℃ for 2 hrs • Wash with PBS 3 times • Using fluorescent analogs the distribution of F-actin in cell can be investigated.
Goals Results Characteristics of Matrix
Morphology
Proliferation
Adhesion
Migration
Fluorescent phalloidin (green) marking ac6n filaments in treated and non-‐treated cells on different s6ffness matrixes
• Breast cancer cells with differen6al aggressive phenotype respond differently to matrix rigidity • Incuba6on in the presence of ROCK inhibitor (Y-‐27632) reduces ac6n organiza6on, adhesion, and prolifera6on of MDA-‐MB-‐231 cells on s6ffer matrices • Effect of matrix rigidity on prolifera6on, migra6on, adhesion, and cytoskeletal organiza6on of SkBr3 cells will be inves6gated
Conclusion/ Future Studies
§ Developing and characterizing PEG based hydrogel matrices with different s6ffness by controlling the UV exposure 6me § Evalua6on cellular responses to matrix rigidity by measuring the morphology, prolifera6on, adhesion and cytoskeletal organiza6on (phaloidin staining).
MDA
-‐MB-‐231
SkBR
3
17 kPa 21 kPa 25 kPa
Shown in the pictures of cell morphology , SKBR3 cells do not have significant different of different s6ffness, So we concentrate our work on finding the rela6onship between treated and non-‐treated MDA-‐MB-‐231 cells.
Structure of F-actin
Non
-‐Treated
Treated
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
17 21 25
Aspe
ct Ra*
o
Compression Modulus (kPa)
Non-‐treated
Treated
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
17 21 25 Ce
ll Area(µm²)
Compression Modulus (kPa)
Non-‐Treated
Treated
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
0.45
0.5
17 21 25
% of G
rowth
Compression Modulus (kPa)
Non-‐treated
Treated
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
17 21 25
Num
ber o
f AR
ache
nd cells
Compression Modulus (kPa)
Non-‐treated
Treated
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
17 21 25
Migra*o
n (µm/hr)
Compression Modulus (kPa)
Non-‐treated
Treated
ROCK Inhibition of MDA-MB-231
17 kPa 21 kPa 25 kPa
Acknowledgement
Authors would like to thank University of Michigan, Dearborn and Office of Vice President of Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor for their financial support
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Weight(g)
Days of incuba*on in PBS
17
21
25
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
2.5 4 6
Mod
ulus (k
Pa)
UV exposure *me (min)