poster 1 - ii international symposium of red kite

1
AN UPDATE OF THE BREEDING AND WINTERING POPULATIONS OF RED KITE (Milvus milvus) IN EXTREMADURA J. Caldera, A. Sánchez, J.M. Abad*, E. Jiménez and S. Pérez Servicio de Conservación de la Naturaleza y Áreas Protegidas. Consejería de Medio Ambiente y Rural, Políticas Agrarias y Territorio. Junta de Extremadura. Av/ Luis Ramallo s/n, 06800 Mérida (Badajoz) Spain. *Contact: [email protected] INTRODUCTION The red kite (Milvus milvus) is classified as “near threatened” at European and global scales, with their core populations experiencing a rapid decline (Birdlife International 2015). In spite of this trend, European northern populations are increasing and it has been pointed out that they could outweigh declines of core populations (Birdlife International 2013). Decline of the populations of Germany, France and Spain, that historically have accounted more than 75% of the global population, have been attributed to a high mortality on the France and Iberian wintering grounds, mainly due to direct illegal poisoning and indirect poisoning from pesticides and rodenticides (Smart et al. 2010). These factors could also heavily influence the rapid decline of the Spanish breeding population, estimated at 46% in the period 1994-2004 (Cardiel 2006). In that same period, the breeding population of Extremadura (SW Spain) has experienced a sharp decline (60-70%). Here, we present the results of the last censuses of the breeding and wintering population in Extremadura. MATERIAL AND METHODS Red kite wintering population were surveyed in nocturnal roost sites along Extremadura in winters 2013-2014 and 2014-2015. An effort to locate new roosting sites were done along all the region and afterwards all them were counted within 7 days to avoid repeated counts. On the other hand, breeding population were estimated in the year 2015 using road transects following the methodology of previous national census (Viñuela et al. 1999). Briefly, 10x10 kms UTM squares were selected scattered across the regional range of the species and road transects were conducted between May and mid July. We have included in the analysis all the 10x10 kms UTM squares with transects of at least 20 kms. RESULTS During the winter censuses a total of 89 ( 46 in Cáceres and 43 in Badajoz) and 76 (35 in Cáceres and 41 in Badajoz) roosting sites were surveyed during the 2013-2014 and 2014-2015 winter periods. Of them, 53 (27 in Cáceres and 26 in Badajoz) in 2013-2014 and 44 (22 in Cáceres and 22 in Badajoz) in 2014-2015 were used by 5243 and 5668 red kites (Fig. 1A), respectively. During the breeding season 2015, a total of 9437.7 km in 239 10x10 km UTM squares were surveyed (Fig. 1D). The estimates for the breeding population of the whole territory were 207 breeding pairs, 75 in Badajoz and 132 in Cáceres (Table 1). Table 1.- Results of the breeding census 2015. 10x10 UTM squares: total (censused). District 10x10 km UTM squares Distance driven (km) No. of red kites Estimated breeding pairs Dehesas Suroeste 28 (19) 978.9 6 15 LlerenaAzuaga 22 (1) 72.1 0 0 Noroeste 22 (17) 805.8 0 0 Serena 27 (10) 399.6 4 18 Sierra Sur 15 (8) 404.9 0 0 Sierras Noreste 21 (12) 440.4 0 0 Tierra de Barros 18 (6) 248.8 1 8 TranchaHornachos 14 (6) 499.5 0 0 Valles Noreste 15 (11) 467.5 1 6 Vegas del Guadiana 30 (11) 449.4 3 16 Zafra 22 (6) 239.0 2 12 Badajoz 234 (107) 5005.89 17 75 Alcántara 7 (4) 137.2 2 6 BrozasCáceres 17 (6) 218.5 2 11 Coria 23 (18) 635.8 12 22 Hurdes 5 (2) 70.5 0 0 Llanos 17 (9) 358.5 6 14 Monfragüe 13 (11) 343.5 4 8 Montaña 3 (1) 25.8 2 9 San PedroMontánchez 22 (15) 650.6 5 13 Sierra de Gata 6 (6) 166.4 2 4 Suroeste 10 (3) 78.1 0 0 TietarNavalmoral de la Mata 18 (15) 521.3 8 15 TrujilloJaraicejo 8 (4) 111.3 0 0 Valle de AmbrozAlagón 18 (14) 434.7 16 24 Valle del Guadiana 10 (3) 101.2 1 6 VeraJerte 10 (7) 190.9 0 0 VilluercasGuadalupe 25 (14) 387.5 0 0 Cáceres 212 (132) 4431.762 60 132 Extremadura 446 (239) 9437.7 77 207 Fig. 1.- (A) Counts of the roosting sites, (B) results of the road transect winter census, (C) estimates of the regional breeding population and (D) coverage of the 2015 census and positive 10x10 km UTM squares. Source: a Cardiel (2006); b Viñuela et al. (1999); c SEO/Birdlife (2014a); d SEO/Birdlife (2014b) DISCUSSION According to the data obtained in previous winter census using road transects (Fig. 1B), the regional wintering population of the red kite have recovered the levels of the I National Census 1993-1994 (Viñuela et al. 1999). This data, together with roosting site counts (Fig. 1A), showed that the wintering population in the province of Badajoz had a higher increase than Cáceres. The same trend have been shown in the breeding estimates, with the population in Badajoz increasing by 82% and in Cáceres decreasing by 45% in the period 2004-2015. This increase should be taken with caution because some areas, as La Serena and Tierra de Barros, had no or low coverage in previous census, but also, it could indicate that some factor may influence differently the population of the species in each of the provinces. In any case, urgent measures should be taken to determine the factors that caused the sharp decline (71%; Fig. 1C) of the regional breeding population in the period 1994-2015. REFERENCES BirdLife International. 2013. Milvus milvus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2013: e.T22695072A40741496. http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2013-2.RLTS.T22695072A40741496.en . Accesed on 15 October 2015 BirdLife International. 2015. European Red List of Birds. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Luxemburg Cardiel I. 2006. El Milano real en España. II Censo Nacional (2004). SEO/Birdlife. Madrid SEO/Birdlife. 2014a. Actualización de la población invernante de Milano real (Milvus milvus) en la Red Natura 2000 de Extremadura. Inedit report for the Junta de Extremadura. SEO/Birdlife. 2014b. Actuaciones para la conservación del Milano real en Extremadura y su plan de recuperación. Inedit report for the Junta de Extremadura. Smart J., Amar A., Sim I.M.W., Etherridge B., Cameron D., Christie G. and Wilson J.D. 2010. Illegal killing slow population recovery of a re- introduced raptor of high conservation concern- The red kite Milvus milvus. Biological Conservation 143(5):1278-1286. Viñuela J., Martí R. and Ruiz A. 1999. El Milano Real en España. Monografia nº6. SEO/Birdlife. Madrid ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We are greatly grateful to Environmental Agents and technicians of the Junta of Extremadura and AEMA for their great effort performing the census of red kites. Gloria Cortázar and Maria Arredondo processed field data from the winter census. a b a a b c d D C d a

Upload: fab

Post on 24-Jul-2016

218 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

DESCRIPTION

Actualización de las poblaciones reproductoras e invernantes de milano real en Extremadura. An update of the breeding and wintering populations of red kite in Extremadura. Javier Caldera, Angel Sánchez, José Mª Abad*, Emilio Jiménez & Sergio Pérez.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Poster 1 - II International Symposium of Red Kite

AN UPDATE OF THE BREEDING AND WINTERING POPULATIONS

OF RED KITE (Milvus milvus) IN EXTREMADURAJ. Caldera, A. Sánchez, J.M. Abad*, E. Jiménez and S. Pérez

Servicio de Conservación de la Naturaleza y Áreas Protegidas. Consejería de Medio Ambiente y Rural, Políticas Agrarias y Territorio. Junta de Extremadura. Av/ Luis Ramallo s/n, 06800

Mérida (Badajoz) Spain. *Contact: [email protected]

INTRODUCTION

The red kite (Milvus milvus) is classified as “near threatened” at European and global scales, with their core populations experiencing a rapid decline (Birdlife International

2015). In spite of this trend, European northern populations are increasing and it has been pointed out that they could outweigh declines of core populations (Birdlife

International 2013). Decline of the populations of Germany, France and Spain, that historically have accounted more than 75% of the global population, have been attributed

to a high mortality on the France and Iberian wintering grounds, mainly due to direct illegal poisoning and indirect poisoning from pesticides and rodenticides (Smart et al.2010). These factors could also heavily influence the rapid decline of the Spanish breeding population, estimated at 46% in the period 1994-2004 (Cardiel 2006). In that same

period, the breeding population of Extremadura (SW Spain) has experienced a sharp decline (60-70%).

Here, we present the results of the last censuses of the breeding and wintering population in Extremadura.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Red kite wintering population were surveyed in nocturnal roost sites along Extremadura in winters 2013-2014 and 2014-2015. An effort to locate new roosting sites were done

along all the region and afterwards all them were counted within 7 days to avoid repeated counts. On the other hand, breeding population were estimated in the year 2015

using road transects following the methodology of previous national census (Viñuela et al. 1999). Briefly, 10x10 kms UTM squares were selected scattered across the regional

range of the species and road transects were conducted between May and mid July. We have included in the analysis all the 10x10 kms UTM squares with transects of at least

20 kms.

RESULTS

During the winter censuses a total of 89 ( 46 in Cáceres and 43 in Badajoz) and 76 (35 in Cáceres and 41 in Badajoz) roosting sites were surveyed during the 2013-2014 and

2014-2015 winter periods. Of them, 53 (27 in Cáceres and 26 in Badajoz) in 2013-2014 and 44 (22 in Cáceres and 22 in Badajoz) in 2014-2015 were used by 5243 and 5668

red kites (Fig. 1A), respectively.

During the breeding season 2015, a total of 9437.7 km in 239 10x10 km UTM squares were surveyed (Fig. 1D). The estimates for the breeding population of the whole

territory were 207 breeding pairs, 75 in Badajoz and 132 in Cáceres (Table 1).

Table 1.- Results of the breeding census 2015. 10x10 UTM squares: total (censused).

District10x10 km 

UTM squares

Distance

driven (km)

No. of red 

kites

Estimated

breeding pairs

Dehesas Suroeste 28 (19) 978.9 6 15

Llerena‐Azuaga 22 (1) 72.1 0 0

Noroeste 22 (17) 805.8 0 0

Serena 27 (10) 399.6 4 18

Sierra Sur 15 (8) 404.9 0 0

Sierras Noreste 21 (12) 440.4 0 0

Tierra de Barros 18 (6) 248.8 1 8

Trancha‐Hornachos 14 (6) 499.5 0 0

Valles Noreste 15 (11) 467.5 1 6

Vegas del Guadiana 30 (11) 449.4 3 16

Zafra 22 (6) 239.0 2 12

Badajoz 234 (107) 5005.89 17 75

Alcántara 7 (4) 137.2 2 6

Brozas‐Cáceres 17 (6) 218.5 2 11

Coria 23 (18) 635.8 12 22

Hurdes 5 (2) 70.5 0 0

Llanos 17 (9) 358.5 6 14

Monfragüe 13 (11) 343.5 4 8

Montaña 3 (1) 25.8 2 9

San Pedro‐Montánchez 22 (15) 650.6 5 13

Sierra de Gata 6 (6) 166.4 2 4

Suroeste 10 (3) 78.1 0 0

Tietar‐Navalmoral de la Mata 18 (15) 521.3 8 15

Trujillo‐Jaraicejo 8 (4) 111.3 0 0

Valle de Ambroz‐Alagón 18 (14) 434.7 16 24

Valle del Guadiana 10 (3) 101.2 1 6

Vera‐Jerte 10 (7) 190.9 0 0

Villuercas‐Guadalupe 25 (14) 387.5 0 0

Cáceres 212 (132) 4431.762 60 132

Extremadura 446 (239) 9437.7 77 207Fig. 1.- (A) Counts of the roosting sites, (B) results of the road transect winter census, (C) estimates of the regionalbreeding population and (D) coverage of the 2015 census and positive 10x10 km UTM squares. Source: a Cardiel (2006);b Viñuela et al. (1999); c SEO/Birdlife (2014a); d SEO/Birdlife (2014b)

DISCUSSION

According to the data obtained in previous winter census using road transects (Fig. 1B), the regional wintering population of the red kite have recovered the levels of the I

National Census 1993-1994 (Viñuela et al. 1999). This data, together with roosting site counts (Fig. 1A), showed that the wintering population in the province of Badajoz had a

higher increase than Cáceres. The same trend have been shown in the breeding estimates, with the population in Badajoz increasing by 82% and in Cáceres decreasing by 45%

in the period 2004-2015. This increase should be taken with caution because some areas, as La Serena and Tierra de Barros, had no or low coverage in previous census, but

also, it could indicate that some factor may influence differently the population of the species in each of the provinces. In any case, urgent measures should be taken to

determine the factors that caused the sharp decline (71%; Fig. 1C) of the regional breeding population in the period 1994-2015.

REFERENCESBirdLife International. 2013. Milvus milvus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2013: e.T22695072A40741496.http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2013-2.RLTS.T22695072A40741496.en . Accesed on 15 October 2015BirdLife International. 2015. European Red List of Birds. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. LuxemburgCardiel I. 2006. El Milano real en España. II Censo Nacional (2004). SEO/Birdlife. MadridSEO/Birdlife. 2014a. Actualización de la población invernante de Milano real (Milvus milvus) en la Red Natura 2000 de Extremadura. Ineditreport for the Junta de Extremadura.SEO/Birdlife. 2014b. Actuaciones para la conservación del Milano real en Extremadura y su plan de recuperación. Inedit report for theJunta de Extremadura.Smart J., Amar A., Sim I.M.W., Etherridge B., Cameron D., Christie G. and Wilson J.D. 2010. Illegal killing slow population recovery of a re-introduced raptor of high conservation concern- The red kite Milvus milvus. Biological Conservation 143(5):1278-1286.Viñuela J., Martí R. and Ruiz A. 1999. El Milano Real en España. Monografia nº6. SEO/Birdlife. Madrid

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSWe are greatly grateful to Environmental Agents andtechnicians of the Junta of Extremadura and AEMA fortheir great effort performing the census of red kites.Gloria Cortázar and Maria Arredondo processed field datafrom the winter census.

a b a

ab

c

d

DC

d

a