post- decontamination report of an identified illegal drug...
TRANSCRIPT
Forensic Applications Consulting Technologies, Inc.
POST- DECONTAMINATION REPORT of an
Identified Illegal Drug Laboratory at:
1809 Lydia Drive Lafayette, CO 80026
Prepared for:
Christina M. Eisert 1027 Mahlon Ct.
Lafayette, CO 80026-1828
Prepared by:
Forensic Applications Consulting Technologies, Inc. 185 Bounty Hunter’s Lane
Bailey, CO 80421
January 27, 2015
Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................. 3
Subject Structure ......................................................................................................................... 3 REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS .................................................................................................. 5
County Requirements.................................................................................................................. 5 State Requirements..................................................................................................................... 5
Governing Body ...................................................................................................................... 6 SAMPLE COLLECTION .................................................................................................................. 6
Wipe Samples ............................................................................................................................. 6 Methamphetamine Analysis ........................................................................................................ 7 QA/QC Precautions ..................................................................................................................... 7
Field Blanks .................................................................................................................... 7 Field Spikes .................................................................................................................... 8
Cross Contamination .......................................................................................................... 8 Sample Locations ................................................................................................................... 8
Sample Results ................................................................................................................ 13 CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................................................................ 15 Appendix A: Supporting Documents Appendix B: Analytical Reports for FACTs Samples Appendix C: Contractor’s Submittals Appendix D: Compact Digital Disk
Lydia Drive Certification FACTs, Inc. Page 2
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY On December 15, 2014, at the request of a potential buyer, a property assessment for the presence of methamphetamine was conducted at 1809 Lydia Drive, Lafayette, CO 80026 (the subject property) by Weecycle Environmental Consulting, Inc. (WEC). The WEC employee was not authorized to do such assessments and virtually no aspect of State regulations was followed, and therefore, the assessment performed by WEC at this property was unlawful. During the unlawful assessment, the unauthorized consultant identified trace levels of methamphetamine at the property. Forensic Applications Consulting Technologies, Inc. (FACTs) was subsequently contracted to perform a legitimate “full clearance assessment” as specified in Section 6 of the State regulations. That assessment indicated the presence of methamphetamine contamination in excess of the regulatory limits in eight areas of the subject property. Between the dates of December 31, 2014 and January 14, 2015, Crystal Clean Decontamination performed decontamination services at the property. On January 14, 2014, FACTs performed a post-decontamination assessment as mandated in State Regulation 6 CCR 1014-3. Based on the totality of circumstances, FACTs concludes: • An illegal drug laboratory, as defined in Colorado Revised Statutes,§25-18.5-101(8) existed at the property since at least December 15, 2014, until the receipt of the post decontamination samples. • Based on the clearance sampling at the subject property in accordance with 6 CCR 1014-3, Part 1, § 6, the cleanup standards established by 6 CCR 1014-3, Part 1, § 7 have been met.
• Clearance sampling was performed and this report was prepared by Mr. Caoimhín P. Connell, Forensic Industrial Hygienist with FACTs. Mr. Connell was assisted in the field by Ms. Christine Carty, 1 President of FACTs. • This final “Post-Decontamination Report” includes a variety of other documents found on the digital disc that accompanies this report. The disc is an integral part of the report and contains, by reference, many of the required elements for a final report.
Subject Structure For the purposes of 6 CCR 1014-3, the property is a 2,132 square foot property not including a 630 square foot attic, and a second 484 square foot attic above the garage. During the performance of the December 22, 2014 Preliminary Assessment, public records from the Assessor’s Office were ambiguous which lead to ambiguities in GPS,
1 Training certificate in Clandestine Drug Laboratory Assessments through the Colorado Regional Community Policing Institute, Colorado Division of Criminal Justice, (US Dept. of Justice High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area). Certified pursuant to 29 CFR §1910.120.
Lydia Drive Certification FACTs, Inc. Page 3
GIS and other directional services. As such, based on the best information available, FACTs presented aerial photographs of the structure. Based on more accurate information, we believe the structures thus depicted were incorrect. Therefore, we are correcting the Preliminary Assessment aerial photograph with the following aerial photograph which we believe properly depicts the correct structure.
Figure 1
General Site Layout2 Although only eight areas in the property required decontamination, the contractor elected to isolate only three compliant areas and clean all remaining areas. The three compliant areas that were isolated were: 1) Force air furnace system 2) Attic above garage 3) Attic above residence All other areas not listed above were cleaned.
2Possible Copyright by Google; fair use exemption accessed through Google Earth™
Lydia Drive Certification FACTs, Inc. Page 4
REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS
County Requirements Boulder County, CO adopted Ordinance 2006-1 concerning methamphetamine contamination in vehicles and structures. Certain aspects of the Boulder County ordinance are contrary to State requirements and the county ordinance creates some conflicts with state regulations. In any event, Boulder County does not enforce State or County Regulations, and actively condones violations of statutes and regulations, both criminal and civil and will not be considered further.
State Requirements Following property decontamination, State regulation 6 CCR 1014-3 Amended requires specific activities that must be completed, specifically: General Sampling Requirements Rubric Action Status 6.9.1 Has at least 400 cm2 of surface area been sampled from every room 6.9.1 Has at least 400 cm2 of surface area from each attic 6.9.1 Has at least 400 cm2 of surface area from each crawlspace NA 6.9.2 Has at least 800 cm2 of total surface been sampled from the property 6.9.3 Has an additional 100 cm2 of surface area been sampled for each additional
500 ft2 greater than (or fraction thereof) 500 ft2?
6.9.4
Has 100 cm2 of the heat exchanger unit been sampled? Has 100 cm2 of the cold air return system been sampled? Has 100 cm2 of the supply air system been sampled? Has 100 cm2 of a fourth elective been sampled? Photo documentation to verify that the ventilation system has been cleaned and is free of debris? NA
6.9.5 Has one discrete sample been collected from each non-ducted heating, cooling or circulating unit? NA
6.9.7 Has the interior of all major appliances (microwaves, refrigerators, freezers, ovens, and dryers) been sampled?
Single Family Dwellings:
Rubric Action Status 6.9 Have all structures on the property been sampled?
Multi-unit building
Rubric Action Status
6.9 If there is exclusive access to any auxiliary portion of the multi-unit property (such as a storage room or garage): Have all such auxiliary structures been sampled?
NA
Buildings and structures whose internal walls were removed during decontamination, or for structures with no rooms.
Rubric Inclusion Status
6.9.10 6.9.10 For structures that have no rooms, the Consultant shall sample at least 100 cm2 of surface area for every 500 ft2 of floor space. . NA
Lydia Drive Certification FACTs, Inc. Page 5
Elements of Final Postdecontamination Report Rubric Inclusion Status
4.11.1 Have the limitations on access of a contaminated shared attic in a multi-unit structure been documented? NA
4.11.1 Does the final report contain language about contacting the HOA regarding contaminated shared attic in a multi-unit structure? NA
4.11.2 Have the limitations on access of a contaminated shared crawlspace in a multi-unit structure been documented? NA
4.11.2 Does the final report contain language about contacting the HOA regarding contaminated shared crawlspace in a multi-unit structure? NA
4.12 Have the limitations on access of a contaminated shared ventilation system in a multi-unit structure been documented? NA
4.12 Does the final report contain language about contacting the HOA regarding contaminated shared ventilation system in a multi-unit structure? NA
8.1 Does the final report contain the Preliminary Assessment Report (or a summary of the information and findings presented therein).
8.2 Photographic documentation of post-decontamination property conditions. 8.3 A description of the sampling procedures used, including sample collection,
handling, and QA/QC.
8.4 Documentation of the analytical methods used, laboratory QA/QC documentation, laboratory report and chain-of-custody.
8.5 Results of post-decontamination clearance sampling 8.5 Computer generated figure of post-decontamination clearance sampling 8.6 Date FACTs received Contractor’s “Decontamination Summary Report” 01/26/15 8.7 Evidence of Consultant certification. 8.8 Signed mandatory language of certification 8.9 Date copy provided to the property owner 1/27/15 8.9 Date copy provided to the Contractor 1/27/15 8.9 Date copy provided to the Department (on or before) 2/26/15 8.10 Date copy provided to the Governing Body 1/27/15
Governing Body For this property, jurisdiction for the abatement of the public nuisance lies with the office of the “Governing Body.” The property lies within Boulder County, and pursuant to CRS §25-18.5-101(7), the office of the “Governing Body” is: Michael Richen, CIH Boulder County Public Health Administration/Environmental Health Site 3450 Broadway Boulder, CO 80304
SAMPLE COLLECTION
Wipe Samples The collection of the samples was performed as described in Section 6 of 6 CCR 1014-3. Exclusively discrete samples were collected for this property with the exception of the forced air system which must, by regulation, (§6.7.1.1.) be a composite sample.
Lydia Drive Certification FACTs, Inc. Page 6
The sample locations were identified by the Industrial Hygienist based on regulatory requirements, which disallow valid standard Industrial Hygiene decision making processes. As such, since the sampling is designed to satisfy regulatory requirements, FACTs cannot guarantee the validity or appropriateness of the samples or their results, and the samples are interpreted exclusively within the context of the regulations. The wipe sample medium was commercially available cotton-poly mixed wipes impregnated with USP isopropyl alcohol. Each proposed sample area was delineated with a measured outline, in compliance with §6.2.2. The wipe samples were collected by methodically wiping the entire surface of the selected area with moderate pressure; first in one direction and then in the opposite direction, folding the gauze to reveal fresh material as necessary. The samples were returned to their independent centrifuge tube and capped with a screw-cap.
Methamphetamine Analysis The wipe samples were submitted under the special regulatory chain-of-custody for analysis to Reservoirs Environmental Laboratories in Denver, CO for analysis by GCMS.3 The special regulatory chain-of-custody is not a normal chain of custody but rather contained the additional regulatory requirements found in Sections §6.2.14.1 through §6.2.14.12
QA/QC Precautions The regulations prohibit the application of standard scientifically valid Industrial Hygiene QA/QC methodologies, and therefore, FACTs employed the mandatory regulatory QA/QC provisions instead.
Field Blanks Field blanks were collected and submitted for analysis pursuant to the requirements of the regulations (which are contrary to good sampling practices). The utility of fields blanks, collected pursuant to State regulations is no longer valid, unless the results are below detection limits. Under normal, standard sampling environmental protocols, there are various types of “blanks.” The purpose of the field blank is to determine if the sampling materials and the handling procedures contributed to the presence of any contaminant identified. According to the new State regulations (Section 6.2.12.1), however, the Industrial Hygienist is required by regulations to open and expose the field blank in a contaminated property, and literally wave the sampling materials around in the potentially contaminated air. Therefore, if contaminant is identified in the field blanks, one would never know if the reported contamination was due to tainted sampling materials and poor handling, or if the reported contamination was the result of
3 The laboratory essentially uses the NIOSH Method 9106 “METHAMPHETAMINE and Illicit Drugs, Precursors and Adulterants on Wipes by Liquid-Liquid Extraction”
Lydia Drive Certification FACTs, Inc. Page 7
contamination after the blank had been exposed to/coming into contact with contamination while opening the field blank in a contaminated property and waving the sampling materials around in the potentially contaminated air. Similarly, pursuant to State regulations, the Industrial Hygienist is required to make every 11th sample and the last sample a field blank. In this way the ability to submit surreptitious blanks to check the laboratory efficacy is lost.
Field Spikes Field spikes are used to evaluate the laboratories ability to properly recover analyte from the samples, and to evaluated the parameter of “bias,” as well as accuracy and precision. However, the regulations state:
§3.7.6.3 … Spiked samples submitted for analysis shall not be used for purposes of compliance with the regulation.
Since the regulatory sampling protocol is not scientifically based, but is based on meeting arbitrary regulatory parameters, no statement regarding bias, precision or accuracy can be made outside of the claims of the laboratory itself. Therefore, no further interpretation is attempted. All other QA/QC considerations are provided in the accompanying laboratory report without interpretation.
Cross Contamination Prior to entering the property, the Industrial Hygienist and his Technician donned disposable Tyvek booties. Prior to the collection of each specific sample, a fresh pair of surgical gloves was donned to protect against the possibility of cross contamination. The pliable ruler used to measure each surface area was decontaminated with a single-use disposable alcohol wipe between samples; alternatively for some samples, single use disposal painter’s tape was applied to delineate the sampling area.
Sample Locations In the following drawings, FACTs has presented the locations of the Clearance Assessment samples. In the Preliminary Assessment, the compass directions were determined using the information on GIS sources. As a result, the compass directions in the drawings of the PA were erroneously rotated 90° clockwise. The compass directions in the following drawings are corrected. In the following figures, shaded sample indicators (triangles) indicate the samples collected during the initial sampling phase on December 22, 2014.
Lydia Drive Certification FACTs, Inc. Page 8
Figure 2
Main Attic Sample Location
Figure 3
Garage Attic Sample Locations
Lydia Drive Certification FACTs, Inc. Page 9
Figure 4
Second Floor Sample Locations
Lydia Drive Certification FACTs, Inc. Page 10
Figure 5
Ground Floor Sample Locations
Lydia Drive Certification FACTs, Inc. Page 11
Figure 6
Basement Sample Locations
Lydia Drive Certification FACTs, Inc. Page 12
Sample Results The state regulations appear to have been written without editorial assistance so that even the word “methamphetamine “ was misspelled on official documents;4 one of the requirements of these regulations (§3.7.6.3) is that “…sample results shall be presented as reported by the analytical laboratory, and shall not be adjusted, changed, or manipulated in any way.” Therefore, for the purposes of meeting this requirement, the following figure is presented:
Figure 7
December 22, 2014 Sample Results Pursuant to §3.7.6.3
4 See for example, http://www.forensic-applications.com/meth/CDPHE_Meth_Blank.pdf
Lydia Drive Certification FACTs, Inc. Page 13
Figure 8
January 14, 2015 Sample Results Pursuant to §3.7.6.3 Obviously, however, in order to know which sample came from where, and compare the sample results with regulatory levels, at some point the sample results must be converted to units that are germane to the regulations. Therefore, in the following table, we have presented the data in units germane to the interpretation of the same for comparison against State levels. State regulations no longer permit an Industrial Hygiene interpretation of the data, and none is presented. The shaded samples were those clearance samples collected on December 22, 2014. All results are in µg/100cm2 unless otherwise indicated.
Lydia Drive Certification FACTs, Inc. Page 14
Sample Number Location Area
Sampled Results
µg/100cm2 LM122214-10 Field Blank NA <0.05* LM122214-13 Furnace composite 400 0.29 LM122214-20 Field Blank NA <0.05* LM122214-22 Main Attic PVC pipe 400 0.25 LM122214-23 Garage attic cleats 400 0.17 LM122214-25 Field Blank NA <0.05* LM011415-01 Ground floor main area N wall 500** 0.01 LM011415-02 Interior of kitchen refrigerator 400 <0.01 LM011415-03 Interior of kitchen stove 400 <0.01 LM011415-04 Interior of dishwasher 400 <0.01 LM011415-05 Ground floor powder bath, door frame 400 <0.01 LM011415-06 Basement Rec room, N wall, east end 400 0.02 LM011415-07 Basement under stairs back of door 400 <0.01 LM011415-08 Basement pantry inside door 400 <0.01 LM011415-09 Basement bathroom, floor 400 0.01 LM011415-10 Basement utility room back of door 400 <0.01 LM011415-11 Field Blank NA <0.05* LM011415-12 Upstairs hall, E wall, E end above BR door 400 <0.01 LM011415-13 Upstairs common bath, East wall 400 <0.01 LM011415-14 Upstairs northwest bedroom, back or door 400 0.06 LM011415-15 Upstairs northeast bedroom, back or door 400 0.02 LM011415-16 Upstairs south bedroom, back or door 400 <0.01 LM011415-17 Master bathroom door frame 400 0.03 LM011415-18 Garage plumbing cover 400 <0.01 LM011415-19 Field Blank NA <0.05*
* Absolute micrograms recovered. The “<” symbol indicated “less than.” ** Room size was greater than 500 ft, but less than 1,000 ft2.
Table 1 Sample Results in Concentration
CONCLUSIONS Based on the totality of circumstances, the property is compliant with the regulatory requirements of 6 CCR 1014-3, and this report is the Consultants certification of compliance as specified in State regulations 6 CCR 1014-3 and by CRS 25-18.5-103 (2)(a). (Please see additional compliance information on the accompanying disc).
-*END*-
Lydia Drive Certification FACTs, Inc. Page 15
Appendix A Supporting Documents
Forensic Applications Consulting Technologies, Inc. Certification, Variations and Signature sheet FACTs project name: Lydia Form # ML14 Date: January 27, 2015 Reporting IH: Caoimhín P. Connell, Forensic IH Certification
Statement Signature I hereby certify that I conducted a preliminary assessment of the subject property in accordance with 6 CCR 1014-3, Part 1, § 4. I do hereby certify that the analytical results reported here are faithfully reproduced. In the section below, describe any variations from the standard: During the Preliminary Assessment, the field blanks were located in the tenth and 20th sample positions instead of the 11th and 21st, positions. Pursuant to the language required in 6 CCR 1014-3, § 8.8 I do hereby certify that I conducted clearance sampling of the subject property in accordance with 6 CCR 1014-3, Part 1, § 6. I further certify that the cleanup standards established by 6 CCR 1014-3, Part 1, § 7 have been met as evidenced by testing I conducted.
Signature Date: January 27, 2015
185 Bounty Hunter’s Lane, Bailey, Colorado 80421 Phone: 303-903-7494 www.forensic-applications.com
Forensic Applications Consulting Technologies, Inc. Consultant Statement of Qualifications
FACTs project name: Lydia Form # ML15 January 27, 2015
Caoimhín P. Connell, has been involved in clandestine drug lab investigations since 2002 and meets the Colorado Revised Statute §24-30-1402 definition of an “Industrial Hygienist” and is authorized under 6 CCR 1014-3 to perform assessments in illegal drug laboratories. He has been a practicing Industrial Hygienist since 1987. Mr. Connell is a recognized authority in drug-lab operations and is a Certified Instructor in Meth-Lab Safety through the Colorado Regional Community Policing Institute, CRCPI (Colorado Division of Criminal Justice) and was the lead instructor for the CRCPI providing over 260 hours of methlab training for over 45 Colorado Law Enforcement Agencies, federal agents, probation and parole officers throughout Colorado judicial districts. He has provided meth-lab lectures to the US Air Force, the National Safety Council, and the American Industrial Hygiene Association (of which he is a member and serves on the Clandestine Drug Lab Work Group and for whom he conducted the May, 2010, Clandestine Drug Lab Course, and is a coauthor of the AIHA methlab assessment publication.) Mr. Connell is a member of the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, the Occupational Hygiene Society of Ireland, the Colorado Drug Investigators Association, an appointed Member of the National Fire Protection Association, and the ASTM International Forensic Sciences Committee, (where he was the sole sponsor of the draft ASTM E50 Standard for the Assessment of Suspected Clandestine Drug Laboratories). From 2009, Mr. Connell served as the Industrial Hygiene Subject Matter Expert on the Federally funded Interagency Board (Health, Medical, and Responder Safety SubGroup), and was elected full member of the IAB-HMRS in 2011 where he now serves. He is the only private consulting Industrial Hygienist in Colorado certified by the Office of National Drug Control Policy High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area Clandestine Drug Lab Safety Program, and P.O.S.T. certified by the Colorado Department of Law. He has received over 194 hours of highly specialized law-enforcement sensitive training in drug lab operation, and under supervision of the US DEA, he has manufactured methamphetamine using a variety of street methods. He has received highly specialized drug lab assessment training through the Iowa National Guard, Midwest Counterdrug Training Center and the Florida National Guard Multijurisdictional Counterdrug Task Force, St. Petersburg College, Rocky Mountain HIDTA, as well as through the US NHTSA, and the U.S. Bureau of Justice Assistance (US Dept. of Justice) and he is currently ARIDE Certified. Mr. Connell is a current sworn law enforcement officer who has conducted clandestine laboratory investigations and performed risk, contamination, hazard and exposure assessments from both the law enforcement (criminal) perspective, and from the civil perspective in residences, apartments, motor vehicles, and condominia. Mr. Connell has conducted over 519 assessments of illegal drug labs in CO, SD, NE, OK, and collected over 4,840 samples during assessments (a partial detailed list of drug lab experience is available on the web at): http://forensic-applications.com/meth/DrugLabExperience2.pdf He has extensive experience performing assessments pursuant to the Colorado meth-lab regulation, 6 CCR 1014-3, and was an original team member on two of the legislative working-groups which wrote the original regulations for the State of Colorado and he was the primary contributing author of Appendix A (Sampling Methods And Procedures) and Attachment to Appendix A (Sampling Methods and Procedures Sampling Theory) of the original Colorado regulations. Mr. Connell strongly objected to the unscientific, unfounded and inappropriate amendments now applicable to those original regulations. Recommended by the US NIOSH as Peer Review Expert for the NIOSH 9109 Method, Methamphetamine, he has been admitted as a drug lab expert in Colorado, and an Industrial Hygiene Expert in Colorado in both civil and criminal courts as well as Federal Court in Pennsylvania. He has provided expert testimony in several criminal cases including Grand Jury testimony and testimony for US Bureau ATF and he testified before the Colorado Board of Health and Colorado Legislature Judicial Committee regarding methlab issues. Mr. Connell has provided services to private consumers, Indian Nations, Sate Investigators, and Federal Investigators.
185 Bounty Hunter’s Lane, Bailey, Colorado 80421 Phone: 303-903-7494 www.forensic-applications.com
Post-Remediation Photograph Log Sheet FACTs project name: Lydia Form # ML9 Date: January 27 , 2015 Reporting IH: Caoimhín P. Connell, Forensic IH
Post-Remediation Photograph Log Sheet FACTs project name: Lydia Form # ML9 Date: January 27 , 2015 Reporting IH: Caoimhín P. Connell, Forensic IH
Post-Remediation Photograph Log Sheet FACTs project name: Lydia Form # ML9 Date: January 27 , 2015 Reporting IH: Caoimhín P. Connell, Forensic IH
Appendix B Analytical Reports
Field Sampling Sheets
Reservoirs Environmental, Inc. Reservoirs Environmental QA Manual
Effective January 1, 2014T:\QAQC\Lab\Reservoirs Environmental QA Manual.doc
PageCover Sheet 1Letter 2Report / Data 3Quality Control Data 4Chain of Custody 5
Forensic Applications
Final Report
RES 308448-1
December 31, 2014
P: 303-964-1986F: 303-477-4275
5801 Logan Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO 80216
Page 1 of 4
1-866-RESI-ENVwww.reilab.com
Reservoirs Environmental, Inc. Reservoirs Environmental QA Manual
Effective January 1, 2014T:\QAQC\Lab\Reservoirs Environmental QA Manual.doc
Laboratory Code: RESSubcontract Number: NALaboratory Report: RES 308448-1Project # / P.O. #: LydiaProject Description:
RES 308448-1
Sincerely,
Jeanne Spencer OrrPresident
Analyst(s): _____________________________________ Mike Schaumloeffel
December 31, 2014
Dear Customer,
Reservoirs has analyzed the following sample(s) using Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS) / GasChromatography Flame Ionization Detector (GC/FID) per your request. The analysis has been completed in generalaccordance with the appropriate methodology as stated in the analysis table. Results have been sent to your office.
property of the customer. Reservoirs Environmental, Inc. will not discuss any part of this study with personnel other thanthose authorized by the client. The results described in this report only apply to the samples analyzed. This report shallnot be reproduced except in full, without written approval from Reservoirs Environmental, Inc. Samples will be disposedof after sixty days unless longer storage is requested. If you should have any questions about this report, please feelfree to call me at 303-964-1986.
Reservoirs Environmental, Inc. is an analytical laboratory accredited for the analysis of Environmental matrices by theNational Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program, Lab Certification #E871030. The laboratory is currentlyproficient in the in-house ERA PAT Program.
is the job number assigned to this study. This report is considered highly confidential and the sole
1809 Lydia Drive Lafayette, CO 80026
Caoimhin Connell
Bailey CO 80421
Forensic Applications185 Bounty Hunter Ln.
P: 303-964-1986F: 303-477-4275
5801 Logan Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO 80216
Page 2 of 4
1-866-RESI-ENVwww.reilab.com
Reservoirs Environmental, Inc. Reservoirs Environmental QA Manual
Effective January 1, 2014T:\QAQC\Lab\Reservoirs Environmental QA Manual.doc
RES Job Number:Client:Client Project Number / P.O.:Client Project Description:Date Samples Received:Analysis Type:Turnaround:Date Samples Analyzed:
Client Lab Reporting METHAMPHETAMINEID Number ID Number Limit CONCENTRATION
(µg) (µg)
LM122214-01 EM 1319463 0.05 4.62LM122214-02 EM 1319464 0.05 BRLLM122214-03 EM 1319465 0.05 BRLLM122214-04 EM 1319466 0.05 BRLLM122214-05 EM 1319467 0.05 BRLLM122214-06 EM 1319468 0.05 BRLLM122214-07 EM 1319469 0.05 44.75LM122214-08 EM 1319470 0.05 4.38LM122214-09 EM 1319471 0.05 0.96LM122214-10 EM 1319472 0.05 BRLLM122214-11 EM 1319473 0.05 BRLLM122214-12 EM 1319474 0.05 1.23LM122214-13 EM 1319475 0.05 1.17LM122214-14 EM 1319476 0.05 21.05LM122214-15 EM 1319477 0.05 0.92LM122214-16 EM 1319478 0.05 6.18LM122214-17 EM 1319479 0.05 2.57LM122214-18 EM 1319480 0.05 BRLLM122214-19 EM 1319481 0.05 0.67LM122214-20 EM 1319482 0.05 BRLLM122214-21 EM 1319483 0.05 4.75LM122214-22 EM 1319484 0.05 1.00LM122214-23 EM 1319485 0.05 0.67LM122214-24 EM 1319486 0.05 5.16LM122214-25 BX EM 1319487 0.05 BRL
December 23, 2014
5 DayMethamphetamine by GCMS
RESERVOIRS ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.NVLAP Accredited Laboratory #101896
AIHA Certificate of Accreditation #480 LAB ID 101533
TABLE I. ANALYSIS: METHAMPHETAMINE BY WIPE
* Unless otherwise noted all quality control samples performed within specifications established by the laboratory.
1809 Lydia Drive Lafayette, CO 80026
December 31, 2014
RES 308448-1
LydiaForensic Applications
P: 303-964-1986F: 303-477-4275
5801 Logan Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO 80216
Page 3 of 4
DATA QA_________
1-866-RESI-ENVwww.reilab.com
Reservoirs Environmental, Inc. Reservoirs Environmental QA Manual
Effective January 1, 2014T:\QAQC\Lab\Reservoirs Environmental QA Manual.doc
QUALITY CONTROL:
RES Job Number:Client:Client Project Number / P.O.:Client Project Description:Date Samples Received:Analysis Type:Turnaround:Date Samples Analyzed:
Matrix Matrix Duplicate Spike
(µg/100cm²) (µg/100cm²) (% RPD) (% Recovery) (% Recovery)
1 0.05 BRL 4 87 822 0.05 BRL 3 93 96
Quality Control Batch 1 = Samples LM122214-01 thru LM122214-08 (EM 1319463 thru 1319470).Quality Control Batch 2 = Samples LM122214-09 thru LM122214-25BK (EM 1319471 thru 1319487).
December 23, 2014
5 DayMethamphetamine by GCMS
* Unless otherwise noted all quality control samples performed within specifications established by the laboratory.
1809 Lydia Drive Lafayette, CO 80026
December 31, 2014
Quality Control Batch
RESERVOIRS ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.NVLAP Accredited Laboratory #101896
AIHA Certificate of Accreditation #480 LAB ID 101533
Laboratory Control SampleMatrix BlankReporting Limit
METHAMPHETAMINE BY WIPE
RES 308448-1
LydiaForensic Applications
P: 303-964-1986F: 303-477-4275
5801 Logan Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO 80216
Page 4 of 4
DATA QA__________
1-866-RESI-ENVwww.reilab.com
Reservoirs Environmental, Inc. Reservoirs Environmental QA Manual
Effective January 1, 2014T:\QAQC\Lab\Reservoirs Environmental QA Manual.doc
PageCover Sheet 1Letter 2Report / Data 3Quality Control Data 4Chain of Custody 5
Forensic Applications
Final Report
RES 310090-1
January 20, 2015
P: 303-964-1986F: 303-477-4275
5801 Logan Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO 80216
Page 1 of 4
1-866-RESI-ENVwww.reilab.com
Reservoirs Environmental, Inc. Reservoirs Environmental QA Manual
Effective January 1, 2014T:\QAQC\Lab\Reservoirs Environmental QA Manual.doc
Laboratory Code: RESSubcontract Number: NALaboratory Report: RES 310090-1Project # / P.O. #: LydiaProject Description:
RES 310090-1
Sincerely,
January 20, 2015
Dear Customer,
Reservoirs has analyzed the following sample(s) using Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS) / GasChromatography Flame Ionization Detector (GC/FID) per your request. The analysis has been completed in generalaccordance with the appropriate methodology as stated in the analysis table. Results have been sent to your office.
property of the customer. Reservoirs Environmental, Inc. will not discuss any part of this study with personnel other thanthose authorized by the client. The results described in this report only apply to the samples analyzed. This report shallnot be reproduced except in full, without written approval from Reservoirs Environmental, Inc. Samples will be disposedof after sixty days unless longer storage is requested. If you should have any questions about this report, please feelfree to call me at 303-964-1986.
Reservoirs Environmental, Inc. is an analytical laboratory accredited for the analysis of Environmental matrices by theNational Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program, Lab Certification #E871030. The laboratory is currentlyproficient in the in-house ERA PAT Program.
is the job number assigned to this study. This report is considered highly confidential and the sole
1809 Lydia Dr., Lafayette CO 80026
Caoimhin Connell
Bailey CO 80421
Forensic Applications185 Bounty Hunter Ln.
Jeanne Spencer OrrPresident
Analyst(s): _____________________________________ Mike Schaumloeffel
P: 303-964-1986F: 303-477-4275
5801 Logan Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO 80216
Page 2 of 4
1-866-RESI-ENVwww.reilab.com
Reservoirs Environmental, Inc. Reservoirs Environmental QA Manual
Effective January 1, 2014T:\QAQC\Lab\Reservoirs Environmental QA Manual.doc
RES Job Number:Client:Client Project Number / P.O.:Client Project Description:Date Samples Received:Analysis Type:Turnaround:Date Samples Analyzed:
Client Lab Reporting METHAMPHETAMINEID Number ID Number Limit CONCENTRATION
(µg) (µg)
LM011415-01 EM 1331726 0.05 0.06LM011415-02 EM 1331727 0.05 BRLLM011415-03 EM 1331728 0.05 BRLLM011415-04 EM 1331729 0.05 BRLLM011415-05 EM 1331730 0.05 BRLLM011415-06 EM 1331731 0.05 0.08LM011415-07 EM 1331732 0.05 BRLLM011415-08 EM 1331733 0.05 BRLLM011415-09 EM 1331734 0.05 0.05LM011415-10 EM 1331735 0.05 BRLLM011415-11 BX EM 1331736 0.05 BRLLM011415-12 EM 1331737 0.05 BRLLM011415-13 EM 1331738 0.05 BRLLM011415-14 EM 1331739 0.05 0.22LM011415-15 EM 1331740 0.05 0.09LM011415-16 EM 1331741 0.05 BRLLM011415-17 EM 1331742 0.05 0.10LM011415-18 EM 1331743 0.05 BRLLM011415-19 BX EM 1331744 0.05 BRL
* Unless otherwise noted all quality control samples performed within specifications established by the laboratory.
1809 Lydia Dr., Lafayette CO 80026
January 20, 2015
RES 310090-1
LydiaForensic Applications
January 14, 2015
5 DayMethamphetamine by GCMS
RESERVOIRS ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.NVLAP Accredited Laboratory #101896
AIHA Certificate of Accreditation #480 LAB ID 101533
TABLE I. ANALYSIS: METHAMPHETAMINE BY WIPE
P: 303-964-1986F: 303-477-4275
5801 Logan Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO 80216
Page 3 of 4
DATA QA_________
1-866-RESI-ENVwww.reilab.com
Reservoirs Environmental, Inc. Reservoirs Environmental QA Manual
Effective January 1, 2014T:\QAQC\Lab\Reservoirs Environmental QA Manual.doc
QUALITY CONTROL:
RES Job Number:Client:Client Project Number / P.O.:Client Project Description:Date Samples Received:Analysis Type:Turnaround:Date Samples Analyzed:
Matrix Matrix Duplicate Spike
(µg/100cm²) (µg/100cm²) (% RPD) (% Recovery) (% Recovery)
1 0.05 BRL 8 104 117
1809 Lydia Dr., Lafayette CO 80026
January 20, 2015
Quality Control Batch
RESERVOIRS ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.NVLAP Accredited Laboratory #101896
AIHA Certificate of Accreditation #480 LAB ID 101533
Laboratory Control SampleMatrix BlankReporting Limit
METHAMPHETAMINE BY WIPE
RES 310090-1
LydiaForensic Applications
January 14, 2015
5 DayMethamphetamine by GCMS
* Unless otherwise noted all quality control samples performed within specifications established by the laboratory.
P: 303-964-1986F: 303-477-4275
5801 Logan Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO 80216
Page 4 of 4
DATA QA__________
1-866-RESI-ENVwww.reilab.com
Appendix C Contractor’s Submittals
1809 Lydia Dr.Lafayette, CO
1/6/2015
Prepared for:
New Customer
Lance Smith
2971 Thunder Lake Cir.
Lafayette, CO 80026
720-309-3512
Prepared by:
BuildSafe Environmental Ltd.
CDPHE Registration No.: ACF - 19059
303 S Broadway Unit 200-239
Denver, CO. 80209
303 522 4315
LIMITED ASBESTOS INSPECTION REPORT
303 S Broadway, 200-239, Denver CO 80209 www.BuildSafeEnviro.com
Section 1 Inspection Project Summary
1.1 Photo Log of Asbestos Containing Materials (if identified)
1.2 Summary of Asbestos Samples
Section 2 Results and Recommendations
Section 3 Project Overview
Section 4 Asbestos Inspection Procedure
4.1 Suspect Asbestos Containing Building Materials
4.2 Sampling and Laboratory Analysis
Section 5 Conclusion
5.1 Limitations
Appendix
A - Laboratory Report and Chain of Custody Form
List of Acronyms
ACM Asbestos Containing Materials BBA Baseboard Adhesive
CA Carpet Adhesive
G Good CDW Composite Drywall
D Damaged CMS CMU Sealant
SD Significantly Damaged CT Ceiling Tile
DT Duct Tape/Wrap
F Friable DW Drywall
NFI Non-Friable Category I FTM Floor Tile Mastic
NFII Non-Friable Category II MA Miscellaneous Adhesive
MS Miscellaneous Sealant
NA Not Analyzed OT Other Material
ND None Detected PI Pipe Insulation
PL Plaster
EA Each RSG Roof Shingle
LF Linear Feet RSH Roof Sheeting
SF Square Feet RSL Roofing Sealant
SVF Sheet Vinyl Flooring
Trace ≤1% by (Point Count/Composite) TS Textured Surfacing
ACM ACM (>1% asbestos) WG Window Glazing
Table of Contents
Job ID: 150105-5 Site Address: 1809 Lydia Dr.
Date: 01/05/15 Lafayette, CO
Inspector: Customer: Lance Smith
CO. Cert #: 17817 Client: New Customer
Owner/Site Contact: Lock Box
Property Type: SFR
Appx Age: N/A
Laboratory: Reason:
NVLAP #: Affected Area:
Results Time: Rush
# of Samples: 11 Inspector Notes:
Inspection Type:
Homogenous Areas in Work Scope Table
# Class/ID Samples Functional Space Scope Qty
1 TS 5 Throughout 1150 SF
2 CDW 1 Throughout 300 SF
3 TS 3 Up NW bedroom 450 SF
4 CDW 1 Up NW bedroom 100 SF
5 CDW 1 Garage 100 SF
6
7
8
9
10
LTD Renovation ACM AHERA/Reg 8
Investigative
Popcorn ceiling, painted drywall in
bedroom, garage
Meth cleanup, test materials which
must be removed
1.1 Photo Log of Asbestos Containing Materials (if identified)None of the materials sampled contain asbestos.
Section 1 Inspection Project Summary
Blake Weise
101-896-0
Reservoirs
TJC on unfinished drywall
Description
White popcorn ceiling
TJC w/ white popcorn
White spray texture on DW
TJC w/ white spray texture
Mat'l
ID # Cond. Category Result
TS 1-1 1 G F ND
TS 1-2 1 G F ND
TS 1-3 1 G F ND
TS 1-4 1 G F ND
TS 1-5 1 G F ND
CDW 1-1 2 G NFII ND
TS 2-1 3 G F ND
TS 2-2 3 G F ND
TS 2-3 3 G F ND
CDW 2-1 4 G NFII ND
CDW 3-1 5 G NFII ND
Section 2 Results and Recommendations
No asbestos-containing building materials have been identified within the affected area(s) of the Site
Address. Please work safely and if any additional materials are discovered that are not listed in the
“Homogenous Areas in Work Scope” table, please contact BuildSafe prior to disturbing these materials.
Any work performed on asbestos-containing building materials and/or trace asbestos-containing building
materials is subject to OSHA regulations, including but not limited to: hazard communication, asbestos
construction industry, general construction industry, and respiratory protection standards. Worker exposure
assessments are part of the asbestos construction industry standard and include excursion limits and 8-hour
time-weighted permissible exposure limits which, if exceeded, may require additional engineering or
administrative controls to properly protect workers engaged in activities that may damage or disturb
materials which contain asbestos.
Garage, N wall, NW corner, 5ft
Upstairs, NW bedroom, E wall, 2ft N, 3ft
Upstairs, NW bedroom, N wall, E of window, 5ft
Upstairs, NW bedroom, closet, SE corner, 2ft
1.2 Summary of Asbestos Samples
Sample Locations
Bulk Sample and Locations Table
Main level, living room, ceiling, 4ft N, 6ft W
Main level, living room, ceiling, 8ft N, 8ft W
Upstairs, S bedroom. Ceiling, 4ft S, 5ft W
Upstairs, hallway, E of attic hatch, 1ft N
Upstairs, NW bedroom, 2ft E, 3ft N
Upstairs, NE bedroom, E ceiling corner, 3ft S
Upstairs, NW bedroom, W wall, 2ft S, 7ft
Section 3 Project Overview BuildSafe Environmental, Ltd. (BuildSafe) was contracted by the client to perform a
limited repair/renovation specific asbestos inspection (inspection) at the above referenced
“Site Address”. The inspection was conducted by an Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) accredited and Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE)
certified Asbestos Building Inspector. The inspection was performed at the direction of
the client and only includes those materials, locations, and quantities specified in the
“Homogenous Areas in Work Scope Table”.
The client is planning repair/renovation activities that will disturb suspect Asbestos
Containing Building Materials (ACBM) within the repair/renovation affected areas at the
Site Address. CDPHE Air Quality Control Commission Regulation No. 8, Part B – Asbestos
(Reg 8) requires that all suspect ACBMs be properly inspected and sampled by certified
personnel prior to conducting any repair/renovation activities that will disturb the suspect
ACBMs. All samples were analyzed by a laboratory accredited under the National
Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP). The CDHPE has established the
following trigger levels for different types of properties, which specify how suspect and
confirmed ACBMs are inspected and subsequently abated:
With regard to single-family residential dwellings (SFRD), the trigger levels are
50 LF on pipes, 32 SF on other surfaces, or the volume equivalent of a 55-gallon
drum
With regard to all areas other than SFRDs, the trigger levels are 260 LF on pipes,
160 SF on other surfaces, or the volume equivalent of a 55-gallon drum
The purpose of the inspection was to identify, visually inspect, and sample all suspect
ACBMs, at the direction of the client, which may be disturbed during the course of the
repair/renovation work.
Section 4 Asbestos Inspection Procedure
The inspection procedure was conducted in accordance with EPA Asbestos Hazard and
Emergency Response Act (AHERA), CDPHE Reg 8, and applicable Occupational Safety
and Health Administration (OSHA) guidelines and regulations. These regulations specify
requirements and protocols for conducting asbestos inspections, sample analysis, and
asbestos abatement.
4.1 Suspect Asbestos Containing Building Materials
Homogenous Material Types
The inspection involved identification and sampling of suspect ACBMs in the areas
established by the client that would be part of the scope of work. Suspect ACBMs were
grouped into homogenous materials based on color, texture, and date of application.
Homogenous materials were given distinct codes (CDW01, FTC02, TS05, etc.) based on
the type sequence of the homogenous material. Details about the size, color, condition,
friability, quantity, location within each functional space and other important details for
each homogenous material were reported as part of the inspection. Homogenous
materials are grouped into one of three categories based on intended use:
1. Surfacing Material – material that is sprayed on, troweled on, or otherwise
applied to surfaces, such as acoustical plaster on ceilings and fireproofing materials
on structural members, or other materials on surfaces for acoustical, fireproofing,
or other purposes.
2. Thermal System Insulation – material applied to pipes, fittings, boilers,
breeching, tanks, ducts, or other interior structural components to prevent heat
loss or gain, or water condensation, or for other purposes.
3. Miscellaneous Materials – interior building material on structural components,
structural members or fixtures, such as floor and ceiling tiles, and does not include
surfacing material or thermal system insulation.
Homogenous Material Friability
Each homogenous material was given one of the three following friability categories
defined by the EPA and CDPHE:
1. Friable Material – materials that can be crumbled or reduced to powder by hand
pressure.
2. Category I Non-friable Material – materials that cannot be crumbled or
reduced to powder by hand pressure including resilient floor coverings, gaskets,
packing materials and asphalt impregnated roofing materials.
3. Category II Non-friable Materials – all other materials that cannot be
crumbled or reduced to powder by hand pressure that do not include category I
non-friable materials.
Homogenous Material Condition
Each homogenous material was given one of three condition categories based on visual
observation defined by the EPA and CDPHE:
1. Good Condition – No visible signs of damage were observed during the
inspection.
2. Damaged Condition – Visible signs of damage less than ten percent spread over
the entire material or twenty five percent localized.
3. Significantly Damaged Condition – Severe damage greater than ten percent
spread over the entire material or twenty five percent localized.
4.2 Sampling and Laboratory Analysis
Sample Collection
Bulk samples of each suspect homogenous material were collected randomly throughout
the homogenous material area within the scope of work. Bulk samples were sampled all
of the way through the material so that all associated layers within each homogenous
material are represented. Bulk samples were placed in closeable sample bags and then
labeled with a permanent marker with distinct sample identifiers (e.g., CDW1-1, FTC2-1,
MISC2-3, etc.) for transport to the laboratory. Sample locations and photographs of the
homogenous materials were also collected at this time during the inspection. Sample
quantities of each homogenous material were collected based on material type and
quantity detailed in the following table as required by regulation:
Homogenous Material
Type Quantity
Minimum Number of
Samples
Surfacing material
0 to <1,000 SF
1,000 to 5,000 SF
>5,000 SF
3
5
7
Thermal System Insulation Each Material
Patch < 6 LF, SF
3
1
Miscellaneous Material Each Material 1
Laboratory Sample Analysis
Bulk samples were submitted to the laboratory along with a completed chain of custody
form to the above listed NVLAP accredited laboratory for analysis by polarized light
microscopy (PLM) techniques per EPA methodology (EPA-600/M4-82-020, Dec. 1982).
Microscopic visual estimation was used in obtaining the percentage of asbestos within
each layer of the bulk samples.
Asbestos Containing Building Materials
EPA and CDPHE both define an asbestos containing building material (ACBM) as a
material which has an asbestos content of greater than one percent. In the event that a
friable material is estimated to contain “trace” or between zero-to-one percent, that
material must undergo a point-count analysis by the laboratory to confirm that the
material is trace asbestos-containing. Further, if a point count analysis is performed on a
bulk sample, the point count result takes precedence over the visual estimation result.
See appendix A for laboratory report and chain of custody documents.
Section 5
Conclusion
BuildSafe has performed a limited repair/renovation specific asbestos inspection of the
home/facility located at the Site Address. Through visual inspection and laboratory
analysis of bulk samples collected at the Site Address, BuildSafe recommends hiring a
certified general asbestos abatement contractor to remove any ACBMs that may have
been identified within the scope of work. All inspection activities were conducted at the
direction of the client and only include those materials, quantities and locations detailed
in sections 1 and 2 of this report. See sections 1 and 2 of this report for information
regarding inspection scope of work, suspect ACBMs, confirmed ACBMs, sample
information and laboratory analysis results.
5.1 Limitations
General Comments and Limitations
Reasonable effort was made by BuildSafe to locate and sample accessible suspect ACBMs
within the scope of work. However, for any structure, the existence of unique or
concealed suspect ACBMs is a strong possibility. BuildSafe only inspected and collected
suspect ACBM bulk samples in the repair/renovation areas at the direction of the client.
This limited repair/renovation asbestos inspection report is not considered a
comprehensive asbestos inspection report and is only valid for the materials and locations
detailed in sections 1 and 2 of this report.
Should further repair/renovation work expand outside of materials and locations listed in
sections 1 and 2 of this report, those locations must be properly inspected and sampled
by qualified personnel prior to disturbance of suspect ACBMs. Any subsequent abatement
of ACBMs must be performed in accordance with all federal, state and local regulations
pertaining to abatement, transport, and disposal of ACBMs.
The asbestos inspection was conducted in a manner consistent with the level of care and
skill exercised by professionals of the asbestos inspection profession. The results,
findings, conclusions and recommendations expressed in this report are based on
conditions observed during our limited inspection of the repair/renovation areas. The
information contained in this report is relevant to the date on which this survey was
performed, and should not be relied upon to represent conditions at a later date. This
report has been prepared on behalf of and exclusively for use by the client for specific
application to the project as discussed. Contractors or consultants reviewing this report
must draw their own conclusions regarding further investigation or remediation deemed
necessary. BuildSafe does not warrant the work of regulatory agencies, laboratories or
other third-parties supplying information which may have been used in the preparation
of this report. No warranty, express or implied is made.
Sincerely,
Blake Weise
BuildSafe Environmental, LTD
303 S Broadway, Unit 200-239
Denver, CO 80209
970.389.5572
Appendix A Laboratory Report and Chain Of Custody Form
Reservoirs Environmental, Inc.
Reservoirs Environmental QA Manual
Effective January 1, 2014
T:\QAQC\Lab\Reservoirs Environmental QA Manual.doc
Subcontract Number: NA
Laboratory Report: RES 309137-1
Project # / P.O. # 150105-5
Project Description: 1809 Lydia Dr. Lafayette, CO
RES 309137-1
Sincerely,
is the job number assigned to this study. This report is considered highly confidential
and the sole property of the customer. Reservoirs Environmental, Inc. will not discuss any part of this study with
personnel other than those of the client. The results described in this report only apply to the samples analyzed.
This report must not be used to claim endorsement of products or analytical results by NVLAP or any agency of the
U.S. Government. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval from Reservoirs
Environmental, Inc. Samples will be disposed of after sixty days unless longer storage is requested. If you have any
questions about this report, please feel free to call 303-964-1986.
Jeanne Spencer
President
January 5, 2015
Dear Customer,
Reservoirs Environmental, Inc. is an analytical laboratory accredited for the analysis of Industrial Hygiene and
Environmental matrices by the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP), Lab Code 101896-0
for Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) and Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) analysis and the American
Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA), Lab ID 101533 - Accreditation Certificate #480 for Phase Contrast
Microscopy (PCM) analysis. This laboratory is currently proficient in both Proficiency Testing and PAT programs
respectively.
Reservoirs Environmental, Inc. has analyzed the following samples for asbestos content as per your request. The
analysis has been completed in general accordance with the appropriate methodology as stated in the attached
analysis table. The results have been submitted to your office.
Build Safe Environmental
303 S. Broadway #200-239
Denver CO 80209
Blake Weise
P: 303-964-1986
F: 303-477-4275
5801 Logan Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO 80216
Page 1 of 4
1-866-RESI-ENV
www.reilab.com
Reservoirs Environmental, Inc.
Reservoirs Environmental QA Manual
Effective January 1, 2014
T:\QAQC\Lab\Reservoirs Environmental QA Manual.doc
TABLE PLM BULK ANALYSIS, PERCENTAGE COMPOSITION BY VOLUME
RES Job Number:
Client:
Client Project Number / P.O.:
Client Project Description:
Date Samples Received:
Method: ND=None Detected
Turnaround: TR=Trace, <1% Visual Estimate
Date Analyzed: Trem-Act=Tremolite-Actinolite
Client Non Non-Sample Sub Asbestos FibrousNumber Physical Part Fibrous Components
Description (%) Mineral Visual Components (%)Estimate (%) (%)
TS1-1 EM 1324105 A
B
White texture w/ white paint
White tan drywall
50
50ND
ND
TR
50
100
50
TS1-2 EM 1324106 A
B
C
White compound
White texture w/ white paint
Tan/white drywall
20
38
42
ND
ND
ND
0
1
70
100
99
30
TS1-3 EM 1324107 A
B
White texture w/ white paint
Tan white drywall
46
54ND
ND
TR
65
100
35
TS1-4 EM 1324108 A
B
Tan/white drywall
White texture w/ white paint
40
60ND
ND
60
TR
40
100
TS1-5 EM 1324109 A
B
White texture w/ white paint
White drywall
25
75ND
ND
TR
20
100
80
RESERVOIRS ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.NVLAP Lab Code 101896-0
TDH Licensed Laboratory # 30-0136
ID Number
L
A
Y
E
R
Lab
2 Hour
RES 309137-1
150105-5
Build Safe Environmental
Asbestos Content
January 5, 2015
1809 Lydia Dr. Lafayette, CO
EPA 600/R-93/116 - Short, Bulk
January 5, 2015
P: 303-964-1986
F: 303-477-4275
5801 Logan Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO 80216
Page 2 of 4
1-866-RESI-ENV
www.reilab.com
Reservoirs Environmental, Inc.
Reservoirs Environmental QA Manual
Effective January 1, 2014
T:\QAQC\Lab\Reservoirs Environmental QA Manual.doc
TABLE PLM BULK ANALYSIS, PERCENTAGE COMPOSITION BY VOLUME
RES Job Number:
Client:
Client Project Number / P.O.:
Client Project Description:
Date Samples Received:
Method: ND=None Detected
Turnaround: TR=Trace, <1% Visual Estimate
Date Analyzed: Trem-Act=Tremolite-Actinolite
Client Non Non-Sample Sub Asbestos FibrousNumber Physical Part Fibrous Components
Description (%) Mineral Visual Components (%)Estimate (%) (%)
RESERVOIRS ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.NVLAP Lab Code 101896-0
TDH Licensed Laboratory # 30-0136
ID Number
L
A
Y
E
R
Lab
2 Hour
RES 309137-1
150105-5
Build Safe Environmental
Asbestos Content
January 5, 2015
1809 Lydia Dr. Lafayette, CO
EPA 600/R-93/116 - Short, Bulk
January 5, 2015
CDW1-1 EM 1324110 A
B
C
D
White joint compound joint compound
White tape
White texture w/ white paint
White drywall
2
3
10
85
ND
ND
ND
ND
TR
90
0
18
100
10
100
82
TS2-1 EM 1324111 A
B
White/multi-layered paint w/ white texture
White drywall
30
70ND
ND
0
50
100
50
TS2-2 EM 1324112 A
B
White/multi-layered paint w/ white texture
Tan/white drywall
35
65ND
ND
0
70
100
30
P: 303-964-1986
F: 303-477-4275
5801 Logan Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO 80216
Page 3 of 4
1-866-RESI-ENV
www.reilab.com
Reservoirs Environmental, Inc.
Reservoirs Environmental QA Manual
Effective January 1, 2014
T:\QAQC\Lab\Reservoirs Environmental QA Manual.doc
TABLE PLM BULK ANALYSIS, PERCENTAGE COMPOSITION BY VOLUME
RES Job Number:
Client:
Client Project Number / P.O.:
Client Project Description:
Date Samples Received:
Method: ND=None Detected
Turnaround: TR=Trace, <1% Visual Estimate
Date Analyzed: Trem-Act=Tremolite-Actinolite
Client Non Non-Sample Sub Asbestos FibrousNumber Physical Part Fibrous Components
Description (%) Mineral Visual Components (%)Estimate (%) (%)
RESERVOIRS ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.NVLAP Lab Code 101896-0
TDH Licensed Laboratory # 30-0136
ID Number
L
A
Y
E
R
Lab
2 Hour
RES 309137-1
150105-5
Build Safe Environmental
Asbestos Content
January 5, 2015
1809 Lydia Dr. Lafayette, CO
EPA 600/R-93/116 - Short, Bulk
January 5, 2015
TS2-3 EM 1324113 A
B
White/multi-layered paint w/ white texture
White/tan drywall
38
62ND
ND
0
60
100
40
CDW2-1 EM 1324114 A
B
C
D
White/multi-layered paint w/ white texture
White tape
White joint compound
White drywall
4
4
4
88
ND
ND
ND
ND
0
85
TR
20
100
15
100
80
CDW3-1 EM 1324115 A
B
C
D
White white compound
White tape
White joint compound
White drywall
1
2
2
95
ND
ND
ND
ND
2
85
0
10
98
15
100
90
TEM Analysis recommended for organically bound material (i.e. floor tile) if PLM results are <1%.
Analyzed by: Data QA:
P: 303-964-1986
F: 303-477-4275
5801 Logan Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO 80216
Page 4 of 4
1-866-RESI-ENV
www.reilab.com
Appendix D Compact Digital Disc