possible recruitment of jack mackerel (trachurus murphyi) from oceanic waters off chile to the stock...
DESCRIPTION
Length distribution of PFA catches from 2007 – 2013TRANSCRIPT
Possible recruitment of jack mackerel (Trachurus murphyi) from oceanic waters off Chile to the stock in Peruvian and
Ecuadorian waters in 2010
Ad CortenNetherlands Ministry of Economic Affairs / Pelagic
Freezertrawler Association
120°W
120°W
110°W
110°W
100°W
100°W
090°W
090°W
080°W
080°W
40°S 40°S
Distribution of catches of juvenile jack mackerel < 25 cm (yellow squares) by the PFA fleet during the 2010 fishing season compared to catches of larger jack mackerel (red squares)
05
101520
15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51 53 55
2007
05
101520
15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51 53 55
2008
05
101520
15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51 53 55
2009
05
101520
15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51 53 55
2010
05
101520
15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51 53 55
2011
05
101520
15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51 53 55
2013
05
101520
15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51 53 55
2012no observations
Length distribution of PFA catches from 2007 – 2013
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130
200
400
600
800
PeruEcuador
thou
sand
tonn
es
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130
200400600800
10001200140016001800
ChileEU
thou
sand
tonn
es
Catches of jack mackerel by country
Peru
Ecuador0°
10°
20°
30°
40°
50°
80°90° 70°100°110° 60°
South Pacific Current
Humboldt Current
Chile
Presumed pathway of juvenile jack mackerel from June to December 2010
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50Total Length (cm)
Aug 2010
Nov 2010
Dec 2010
Jan 2011
Feb
Mar
Apr May
Jul
Oct
Dec
Sep
Jun
Aug
Feb
Apr
Jan 2012
Mar
length distribution of commercial catches in Peru in November 2010 – April 2012
15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51 53 550
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
length distribution of jack mackerel catches in Ecuador in February 2011
may
-10
jun-
10ju
l-10
aug-
10se
p-10
oct-
10no
v-10
dec-
10ja
n-11
feb-
11m
ar-1
1ap
r-11
may
-11
jun-
11ju
l-11
aug-
11se
p-11
oct-
11no
v-11
dec-
11ja
n-12
feb-
12m
ar-1
2ap
r-12
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
tota
l len
gth
EU catches in central Pacific
catches Peruvian fleet
Time axis with modal length of juvenile jack mackerel in central Pacific (June 2010) and modal length in Peruvian catches (November 2010 – April 2012). All measurements in total length
Peru
Ecuador0°
10°
20°
30°
40°
50°
80°90° 70°100°110° 60°
South Pacific Current
Humboldt Current
Chile
Presumed pathway of juvenile jack mackerel from June to December 2010
Positive SST anomalies in eastern Pacific in April 2010 illustrate the existence of an El Niño in the first half of 2010
Strong negative SST anomalies in the eastern Pacific in September 2010 illustrate the existence of a La Niña in the second half of the year
Suitable habitats for jack mackerel in the south-eastern Pacific
Classical scheme of juvenile jack mackerel migrations off Chile. From Arcos et al. 2001
Flota Peruana
Flota Chilena
ZE
ZE
ZC
15ºC
15ºC
Recent model for migrations of juvenile jack mackerel in the south-eastern Pacific. From Gretchina et al. 2007
Distribution of juveniles (red cloud) off Chile in a normal year (left) and in an El Niño year (right). From Gretchina et al. 2007.
Chilean juveniles may be adopted by the Peruvian population
• “Adopted Migrant” hypothesis (McQuinn 1997)
• Pelagic fish develop an attachment to the area where they happen to be at the time they turn into adults
• In this way, juveniles from Chilean origin may turn into “Peruvian” jack mackerel with biological characteristics similar to the Peruvian population
Conclusions
• Immigration of juveniles from Chile into Peru are likely to happen during La Niña periods
• A strong La Niña occurred in the second half of 2010
• This may have resulted in a transport of juveniles of year- class 2008 from Chile to Peru at this time
• The Chilean juveniles may have been “adopted” by the Peruvian population
• The occasional immigration of juveniles from Chile into Peru would explain the lack of genetic difference between the population in both areas