port planning, design and construction the times they are

2
Well-run container terminal operations are generally high margin businesses characterised by predictable revenue streams. In a bid to maximise profits, many port operators have actively pursued sector-based and geographical asset diversification, expanding their current operations or acquiring overseas port management businesses in order to grow, as well as to mitigate risks linked with specific regional or national markets. However, even as global trade continues to increase, warning signals on the future of the container terminal industry have begun to surface. The organic growth of container handling volumes has slowed in response to a declaration from China that it will see a five-year low in its economic growth rate this year. This slowdown is exacerbated by off- shoring and outsourcing cycles from global sourcing reaching optimum levels. This in turn has led to a decline in the growth of container traffic driven by such activities. Correspondingly, the expansion of port operators and new port facilities coming online has led to increased levels of competition in the industry. Operators are now unable to raise container handling fees without losing business as liners have the option to head to other competing ports to service their cargo. With limited top-line growth, port operators have to look for new ways to optimise business returns. They must select the right customers and deliver the right level of service to maximise port output and profitability. Traditional model overhaul A fixed-variable cost approach is the standard way port operators use to analyse their business. Cranes, trucks and other physical assets are examples of fixed costs, while wages of dockworkers and utility bills are two types of variable costs. Operators measure the average variable cost of handling each container and set a price factoring in a profit margin after covering the costs of cranes, trucks and other container handling equipment. Such a model is simple to understand and easy to adopt. To implement this business model organisationally, a company’s sales department will be responsible for selling as much as they can at a price higher than the variable cost. Operations will be responsible The times they are a-changin’: new models in port business Fox Chu, Director of Infrastructure and Transportation Asia Pacific, Accenture, Shanghai, China 42 Edition 64: November 2014 www.porttechnology.org PORT PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION

Upload: others

Post on 15-Apr-2022

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Port Planning, Design anD ConstruCtion The times they are

Well-run container terminal operations are generally high margin businesses characterised by predictable revenue streams. In a bid to maximise profits, many port operators have actively pursued sector-based and geographical asset diversification, expanding their current operations or acquiring overseas port management businesses in order to grow, as well as to mitigate risks linked with specific regional or national markets.

However, even as global trade continues to increase, warning signals on the future of the container terminal industry have begun to surface. The organic growth of container handling volumes has slowed in response to a declaration from China that it will see a five-year low in its economic growth rate this year.

This slowdown is exacerbated by off-shoring and outsourcing cycles from global sourcing reaching optimum levels. This in turn has led to a decline in the growth of container traffic driven by such activities.

Correspondingly, the expansion of port operators and new port facilities coming online has led to increased levels of competition in the industry. Operators are now unable to raise container handling fees without losing business as liners have the option to head to other competing ports to service their cargo.

With limited top-line growth, port operators have to look for new ways to optimise business returns. They must select the right customers and deliver the right level of service to maximise port output and profitability.

Traditional model overhaulA fixed-variable cost approach is the standard way port operators use to analyse their business. Cranes, trucks and other physical assets are examples of fixed costs, while wages of dockworkers and utility bills are two types of variable costs. Operators measure the average variable cost of handling each container and set a price factoring in a profit margin after covering the costs of cranes, trucks and other container handling equipment.

Such a model is simple to understand and easy to adopt. To implement this business model organisat ional ly, a company ’s sales department will be responsible for selling as much as they can at a price higher than the variable cost. Operations will be responsible

The times they are a-changin’: new models in port business

Fox Chu, Director of Infrastructure and Transportation Asia Pacific, Accenture, Shanghai, China

42 Edit ion 64: November 2014 www.por ttechnolog y.org

Port Planning, Design anD ConstruCtion

Page 2: Port Planning, Design anD ConstruCtion The times they are

for productivity while finance will be responsible for billing and collection.

The traditional approach has worked well until recently when port congestion became an issue. On top of organic growth, more and more vessel sharing agreements have led to an exponential increase in the complexities of terminal o p e r a t i o n s . I n c r e a s e d c o n t a i n e r movements are required, along with rework due to unpredictability, and this has led to a rise in resource utilisation. The r ise in such non-value added activities has consumed terminal handling capacity, pushing capacity to saturation and resulting in congestion.

This is exacerbated by how port operators, in their bid to add value, have taken on customised activities from shipping lines, not all of which are revenue-generating, further dampening the ability for port operators to maximise profits.

Activity-based costingAccenture has introduced an activity-based costing approach to help port clients improve asset efficiency and maintain performance. This new model addresses the relationship between assets, resources and business activities by allocating the cost of assets to revenue-generating activities.

The model is supported by enhanced analytical capabilities which identify meaningful performance indicators such as revenue per customer, per service, per vessel, per equipment deployed, per intermodal mode and thereby this method provides a fresh view of asset efficiency. The enhanced business optimisation it provides helps management decide the right mix of business, the service level to be committed, operations resources and equipment to be deployed, and the right level of terminal utilisation to maximise profitability.

Need for changeTo achieve business benefits , port operators cannot remain within the traditional paradigm of fixed-variable cost modelling. They need to introduce an enterprise-wide change encompassing process, organisation and technology.

Also, the need for change will create opportunities for functional departments to play more significant roles to add value. Finance can take up the analysis role and partner commercial and operations activities to determine the optimal mix of price and service level to each customer. The commercial areas of a business can offer more in-depth insights to determine the price, volume and service-level mix to maximise profitability from each customer. Operations can review cost components to separate revenue-generating and non-revenue-generating activities, and identify areas to minimise wastage due to under-utilisation.

Port operators should take advantage of today ’s sophist icated model l ing technology to support data analysis and generate insights. These multi-dimensional analytical tools will be valuable in extracting and transforming data across finance and accounting systems, terminal operating systems and customer relationship management systems, as they serve as the heart o f ac t i v i t y-based cos t mode l l ing implementation.

Several port operators have already embarked on this journey and achieved significant results. The implementation o f ac t i v i t y -ba sed cos t mode l l ing analytical tools has empowered not only senior management, but a lso the super visor y level of functional departments who have embedded the technology into their day-to-day routine, thereby taking up new roles contributing to enterprise value.

About the author

Fox Chu has been with Accenture’s Transportation and Travel practice since 2005. He is currently the APAC Port Industry Lead, driving the business development and running key accounts in the region. Fox has extensive project experience in transportation services, spanning across airport and seaport terminals, as well as shipping lines, logistics, postal and express, and global sourcing. Representative port accounts that Fox is serving include major port operators in Hong Kong, Singapore, China (Shanghai and Shenzhen) and Indonesia.

About the organisation

Accenture is a global management consulting, technology services and outsourcing company incorporated in Ireland, with more than 305,000 people serving clients in more than 120 countries. Combining unparalleled experience, comprehensive capabilities across all industries and business functions, and extensive research on the world’s most successful companies, Accenture collaborates with clients to help them become high-performance businesses and governments. The company generated net revenues of US$30 billion for the fiscal year ending August 31, 2014.

Enquiries

[email protected]

Edit ion 64: November 2014 43

Port Planning, Design anD ConstruCtion