polyinsertion and romp i polyinsertion€¦ · 1.3 industrially important polymers prepared via...
TRANSCRIPT
- 70 -
POLYINSERTION and ROMP
I Polyinsertion
Assignment of tasks
Synthesis of isotactic polystyrene (it-PS) with the heterogeneous Ziegler-catalyst TiC14/(iBu)3A1 in
heptane as solvent.
Literature
1. H. G. Elias: Bd. 1, 1. Auflage, Wiley-VCH-Verlag, Weinheim, 2005.
2. Compr. Polym. Sci., Vol. 4, Part II, 1. Aufl., Pergamon Press GmbH 1989
Content
1. Theoretical basics
1.1. Ziegler-Natta catalysts
1.2. Mechanisms
1.3. Industrially produced polymers
2. Description of the experiment
2.1. Safety
2.2. Chemicals and equipment
2.3. Experimental procedure
3. Questions
- 71 -
1 Theoretical basics
1.1 Ziegler-Natta catalysts
In the last few years, transition metal-based catalysts have gained great importance, especially for the
polymerization of ethylene at low pressures, as well as for the synthesis of polypropylene.
Furthermore, they offer a wide range of applications in the preparation of stereoregular polymers.
Among the technically most important catalysts in this area are the so-called Ziegler-catalysts (also
named Ziegler-Natta-catalysts). Systems, which are made by mixing organometallic compounds of
transition group elements IV-VIII with metals alkyls or metals hydrides of the groups I – III of the
periodic system, are referred as Ziegler-catalyst. A typical Ziegler-catalyst is formed, for example,
by the reaction of TiCl4 with Et3Al. These catalysts is heterogeneous, because they precipitate as a
fine suspension in an organic solvent (for example from heptane). At the beginning of catalyst
research, this heterogeneity was assumed to be responsible for catalyst activity (“catalytic surfaces”),
however, Kaminsky et al. found that also soluble (homogeneous) systems display similar activities.
Such homogeneous Ziegler-catalysts can be generated through the combination of, e.g.,
bis(cyclopentadienyl)titanium(IV)
dichloride (Cp2TiCl2, a metallocene catalyst) with
diethylaluminiumchloride (Et2AlCl).
A few further important catalytic systems:
Et2AlCl/TiCl3 heterogeneous
Et2AlCl/VCl4/anisole homogeneous
Et2AlCl/V(acac)3 homogeneous
Et2AlCl/Cr(acac)3 homogeneous
Cp2ZrMe2/alumoxane homogeneous
Besides the Ziegler-catalyst, the so-called "Phillips-catalyst" (CrO3/SiO2/A12O3) is of technical
importance, especially in the polymerization of ethylene.
1.2 Mechanisms
The polymerization occurs at the transition metal-carbon bond. The active species and the reaction
mechanism are, with the exception of Phillips-catalysts, mostly clarified. The growth step can
principally take place over a mono- or bimetallic mechanism.
- 72 -
Monometallic mechanism
In the so-called monometallic mechanism (Fig. 1) it is assumed that the olefin approaches first to a
vacant site of the transition metal with its π-bond, and then coordinates to it. The coordinated
monomer is then inserted into the metal-carbon bond via a four-membered transition state.
Fig. 1: Monometallic mechanism.
The main group metal complex is not involved into the chain growth reaction; it is only used for the
alkylation of the transition metal complex ("monometallic"). There are (idealized) separated ion
pairs. In fact, however, these ion pairs are in reality never completely separated from each other, and
the termination and transfer reactions can be easily explained via the following reaction scheme:
Termination caused by β-hydride elimination:
Transfer to the monomer:
Molecular weight control by H2:
- 73 -
Bimetallic mechanism
In the bimetallic mechanism (Fig. 2) both metal atoms are involved in the reaction. The π-electron of
the olefin interacts first with the orbitals of the transition metal, wherein an electron-deficient
compound is formed. The free rotation of the only partially resolved C-C double bond remains
rescinded, and there is also no free rotation around the metal-carbon bond. Therefore, the substituent
R remains fixed in the further reaction steps with respect to its position relative to the methyl group
of the last inserted monomer unit. By ring formation the free residual valences are saturated. The
overlap of electrons at C(1) and C(3) forms a σ-bond. At the same time the Al-C(3) bond is broken
and the starting complex can be formed again with an extended polymer chain.
Fig. 2: Bimetallic mechanism.
The general principles of such a mechanistic model can be applied to both homogeneous and
heterogeneous catalysis. The all-accepted fact is that, in the case of heterogeneous catalysis, the
catalytically active sites on the crystal surface of the heterogeneous contact are built from originally
defects presented in the crystal structure. If any α-olefin, e.g., styrene is used instead of ethylene as
monomer, there is the possibility of the formation of various stereoregular polymer chains (Fig. 3),
such as isotactic (it), syndiotactic (st) chains and atactic (at) for those that do not have
stereoregularity in the polymer chains. Chains, in which all the side-group carbon atoms have the
same absolute configuration (RRRR or SSSS) are called isotactic. In syndiotactic chains, the
configuration alternates along the chain (RSRS etc.). By means of the zig-zag-(also Natta-) projection
used in polymer chemistry, these regular and the non-regular (R and S are randomly distributed)
- 74 -
atactic forms can be described. The stereoregularity of polymers has a very strong influence on their
physical properties. Atactic polymers, for example, are generally amorphous, and their glass
temperatures are relatively low and extend as freeze-range over several degrees. However, the iso-
and syndiotactic polymers generally can be crystallized; their melting points Tm are high and well-
defined, also the solubility is greatly reduced due to the high crystallinity. The various forms can be
characterized by both IR- and NMR.
Fig 3: Natta-projection.
The following Table summarizes some of the properties (G. Natta, 1959).
Table 1. Comparison of the properties of stereoregular and atactic polymers.
product solid state Tm /
° C
Tg /
° C
density /
g·cm-3
solubility* in
diethyl ether
solubility* in
toluene
PP
at amorphous -20 0,85 s ss
it crystalline 158 - 160 -10 0,93 ds s
PB
at amorphous -24 0,87 s ss
it crystalline 126 - 128 0,91 ds s
PS
at amorphous 70 - 100 1,04 s ss
it crystalline 230 - 231 1,08 ds s
* s: soluble; ds: difficultly soluble; ss: slightly soluble.
- 75 -
1.3 Industrially important polymers prepared via coordinative polymerization
HDPE, high density polyethylene
Hostalen (Hoechst), Marlex (Phillips)
vessels, bags, sheets, dishes, disposable products, cable sheathing, insulators, hip joints, ...
it-PP, it-polypropylen
Hostalen PP (Hoechst), Novolen (BASF)
temperature-resistant containers, vessels, automotive, upholstery, ...
it-PB, it-poly-l-butene
tear-resistant films, pipes, ...
poly-4-methyl-l-pentene
TPX (Mitsui)
electrical and lighting industry, temperature resistant (mp 240 ° C), medical applications
trans-1,4-polyisoprene
golf balls, medical applications (for example shoe inserts)
cis-1,4-polyisoprene und -butadiene
rubber and tire industry
2 Experimental produce
2.1 Safety: All persons being exposed to chemicals have to be instructed about the effects of
dangerous substances (toxicity, point of ignition, etc.) as well as about preventive measures. Before
the experiment is carried out, read the MSDS sheets for all the chemicals used in this laboratory and
be familiar with their safe handling. The instructions of the teaching assistant must be followed at all
times. Especially the following points are relevant:
1. Wearing of suitable protective clothing (protective goggles, glove, laboratory coat, etc.)
2. Knowledge about the safety devices (e.g., laboratory hood, fire extinguisher, emergency
shower, first aid boxes, etc.), exit
3. Controlled disposal of toxic substances in compliance with legal regulations
4. Strict ban on eating, drinking and fuming in the laboratory
- 76 -
The greatest possible care must be exercised when working with organoaluminum compounds, since
they ignite very easily on contact with air and water. All operations must, therefore, be carried out
with the complete exclusion of air and moisture and pipettes must be flushed with nitrogen.
Moreover, these substances cause wounds that are slow to heal, so that the wearing of safety goggles
is mandatory and all contact with the skin must be avoided. The pipettes are cleaned as follows: after
all organoaluminum have been run out, the pipette is filled with ether and allowed to drain again. It is
then washed with isopropanol/HCl solvents.
2.2 Chemicals and equipment
Chemicals: heptane abs., triisobutylaluminium (25% in hexane), TiCl4 (caution!), styrene (freshly
distilled), 2-propanol, methanolic HCl (ca. 10%), methanol, methyl ethyl ketone (MEK), toluene.
Equipment: Gas purification system, Schlenk line with pressure relief valve, 500 mL three-neck flask
with gas introduction, KPG-stirrer, dropping funnel with pressure balance and
three-way valve, thermometer, oil bath with temperature sensor, hotplate, extraction flask with reflux
condenser and heating mantle, heating gun, vacuum desiccator (heatable), vacuum pump, N2-
cylinder with pressure reducer.
2.3 Experiment
The apparatus is evacuated (vacuum pump, slightly heated (heat gun) and filled with N2. After
cooling down the apparatus, 50 mL of absolute heptane are added with the aid of a dropping funnel
to the flask. Under a nitrogen atmosphere 1.0 mL of TiCl4 is added by a syringe and then 25 mL of
the aluminumalkyl-solution are added drop wise over a period of 20 minutes. Since the reaction of
the two catalyst is highly exothermic, an external cooling may be necessary. After approximately 10
minutes “aging time” of the catalyst, 25 mL styrene are added to the solution at once. The reaction
mixture is heated up to 75 °C (inside temperature) for 3-4 hours. After the mixture is cooled to room
temperature, the polymerization is stopped by adding 20 mL of 2-propanol under N2 and then
100 mL of 2-propanolic HCl subsequently (thorough mixing by vigorous stirring required). The
polymer is filtered off and washed thoroughly with methanol. The crude product is boiled under
reflux with 80 mL of methyl ethyl ketone, and then portion wise 30 mL of toluene are added and
extracted for 5 hours. The residue is first decanted and then sucked off with a coarse frit. After
washing with methyl ethyl ketone, the polymer is dried at 60 ° C in a vacuum desiccator. Both the
yield of it polystyrene and the melting range are to be determinated.
3 Questions about coordinative polymerization
- 77 -
1. Why is the extraction with MEK and toluene necessary?
2. What are the molar concentrations of the catalyst components in the reaction mixture?
Calculate the ratio Ti:styrene!
3. What is the difference between Fischer-projection and Natta-(Zig-Zag-) projection?
4. What is the difference between low and high pressure PE? Physically? Chemically?
5. What is meant by a 3rd
-generation Ziegler catalyst?
6. Why can vinyl ether not be coordinative polymerized by TiCl4/Et3Al?
7. Structures of HDPE, LDPE, LLDPE, it-PP, st-PP, PB, trans-1,4-polyisoprene,
poly(4-methyl-1-pentene), cis-1,4-polybutadiene?
- 78 -
II Ring-Opening Metathesis Polymerization (ROMP)
Task
Polymerization of norbornene derivatives using the metathesis reaction and a transition metal
alkylidene catalyst.
Literature
1. R. H. Grubbs (Ed.) Handbook of Metathesis, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, (2003)
2. M. Chanda, Introduction to Polymer Science and Chemistry: A Problem Solving Approach, CRC Press Inc.,
(2006)
3. F. J. David, Polymer Chemistry: A Practical Approach, Oxford University Press, (2004)
4. P. W. N. M van Leeuwen, Homogeneous Catalysts: Activity, Stability, Deactivation, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim,
(2011)
5. M. R. Buchmeiser, Chem. Rev. (2000), 100, 1565
Content
1. Introduction
2. Mechanism
3. Experimental part
4. Chemicals, equipment and safety
5. Experiment
6. Questions
- 79 -
1 Introduction
Today catalytic olefin metathesis, in addition to palladium catalyzed coupling reactions, is one of the most important
chemical reactions for the formation of carbon-carbon bonds. It has had an undeniable impact on various areas of
chemistry. Olefin metathesis is the exchange of alkenyl groups of two olefins in the presence of a metal alkylidene
catalyst. The results is a thermodynamically equilibrated mixture of products consisting of cis- and trans-olefins (Figure
1).
Fig. 1: General olefin metathesis reaction.
Olefin metathesis opened the door for a wide range of new methods and research areas in both organic and polymer
chemistry. One important area is the research on organometallic compounds done by Schrock, Grubbs, Katz and many
others. The need for catalytically active species of these kinds is rising ever since.
Fig. 2: Catalytic cycle of olefin metathesis.
Outstanding contributions in this field were provided by Chauvin (postulation of the right mechanism), Schrock
(synthesis and characterization of the first highly active well defined metathesis catalysts) and Grubbs (synthesis of
broadly applicable and (air) stable catalysts). In 2005 they shared the Chemistry Nobel Prize.
- 80 -
In 1971, Y. Chauvin postulated that the olefin adds to the metal carbon double bond via a [2+2] cycloaddition. The
resulting intermediate is a metalla-cyclobutane species, which reacts to the product olefin and a new metal alkylidene via
a [2+2] cycloreversion. All steps in this reaction, in principle, are reversible. Thus, the product can be transformed back
to the starting material. Therefore, a driving force is needed to achieve high conversions and constantly shift the
equilibrium to the product side. This is illustrated in detail in Figure 2.
First observations of this kind of reactions were made in the 1950s when strange side products occured in the
polymerisation of ethylene in the presence of various metals. In early attempts, compounds like MoO3, WCl6, WOCl4 or
Re2O7 were used to selectively catalyze olefin metathesis. In addition, an alkylating agent had to be present (e.g., SnR4,
AlR3, etc.). These systems were highly active (but not selective). Another striking disadvantage was that they were
relatively short living and sensitive for impurities containing functional groups. In many cases, the real catalytically
active species remains unknown until today.
In 1964 Fischer synthesized the first metal-carbon double bond (carbene). The so called Fischer-carbenes are stabilized
by π-donors (Figure 3). Thus, these carbenes have a singlet configuration.
Fig. 3: Fischer-Carbene.
In 1974 Schrock prepaired the first metal-carbene without neighboring π-donors and with a transition metal in its highest
oxidation state. His alkylidenes (Figure 4) differ from Fischer-carbenes in that they possess a triplet configuration of the
metal carbon bond. Schrock synthesized complex 2 (Figure 4) by treating tantalum pentachloride with neopentyl lithium.
Fig. 4: First examples of a Schrock-carbene (alkylidene).
Through α-H-abstraction one equivalent of neopentane is lost and the new alkylidene forms. Schrock consequentially
recognized the unstable character of pentaalkyl substituted tantalum and proposed the formation of alkylidenes by this
mechanism. Over the years new and more active and stable catalysts were prepaired with great effort (Schrocks catalysts,
Figure 5). Grubbs made the invention of air (bench-top) stable rutheniumcarbenes (Figure 6), which set a new landmark
in the applicability of these catalysts. They are made by oxidation of Ru(II)-precursors. They complement to Schrocks
catalysts in their properties, because in general they are less active but also less sensitive. First and foremost they are
more stable to protic functional groups like alcohols or water. Schrock-alkylidenes in return have a better tolerance
towards functional groups containing sulfur, nitrogen or phosphorus.
- 81 -
Fig. 5: General structure of tungsten- or molybdenum-alkylidene catalysts.
RuR
Cl
Cl
L
L
Ru
P(Cy)3
P(Cy)3
Cl
Cl RuCl
ClP(Cy)3
NNMesMes
Grubbs I
Ru
P(Cy)3Cl
ClO Ru
Cl
ClO
NNMesMes
Grubbs-Hoveyda I
Grubbs II
Grubbs-Hoveyda IIRu
CF3COO
CF3COOO
NNMesMes
Buchmeiser-Grubbs-Hoveyda
Fig. 6: General structure and important examples of Grubbs-catalysts.
- 82 -
Olefin Metathesis Reactions
Some olefin metathesis reactions are shown in the following schemes.
nn
Rn
Rn
XX X
x yz
Ring Opening Metathesis Polymerization (ROMP)
1-Alkyne Polymerization
Cyclopolymerization
nn
n
+
Acyclic Diene Metathesis Polymerization (ADMET)
R
R'+ R
R'
+Crossmetathesis
R +R'
R R'
Cross-Ene-Yne-Metathesis
X
R
n
X Rn
RingclosingEne-yne-Metathesis
X
R +
X
R
Cross-Ene-Diyne-Metathesis
R +
RRing opening
Cross-metathesis
XTandem-
Ringopening CrossmetathesisX
X
Ringclosing metathesis X
+
Fig. 7: Examples for metathesis reactions.
One important aim of such catalytic reactions is the selective formation of E- and Z-double bonds. In general, E-double
bonds are thermodynamically favored. In the case of moderately controlled reactions a mixture of E- und Z- configured
products is formed. Another important factor is the control of tacticity in stereoregular polymers. Besides Mo- and W- ,
- 83 -
some highly selective Ru-catalysts have been reported. Normally, the driving forces for the reactions shown in Figure 7
are release of volatile molecules (ethylene, etc.), entropic effects, release of ring strain or the formation of highly
conjugated systems.
2 ROMP: Mechanisms
Ring opening metathesis polymerization (ROMP) is a reaction where mostly strained double bonds are opened by the
catalyst (better: initiator) and rearranged subsequently with other olefins to form chains. Basically, it follows a chain-
growth mechanism. Usually, a monocyclic (e.g., cyclopentene, cyclooctene, cyclooctadiene etc.) or polycyclic (e.g.,
norbornene, dicyclopentadiene etc.) monomer with higher ring strain is used. The general mechanism is shown in Figure
8.
Fig. 8: Mechanism of the ring opening metathesis polymerization.
Besides the mentioned growth and termination of a polymer chain, several side reactions are also of importance.
Particularly undesired terminations, which end the reaction in an unpredictable manner are responsible for a wide range
of products and a broad molecular weight distribution.
- 84 -
Fig. 9: Undesired terminations that can occur in ROMP.
RR
R R
n/2
R R
n/2
R R
RR
R R
n/2
R R
n/2
R R
R
R
[cat.]
n
cis-syndio tactic
cis-iso tactic
trans-iso tactic
trans-syndio tactic
Fig. 10: Formation of different polymer structures of poly-Norbornadienenes through ROMP.
The determining factor for the physical properties of polymers is their microstructure. For instance, the ROMP of
substituted norbornadienenes can produce four different regular structures of the polymer or a mixture of them. Cis- and
trans- double bonds as well as iso- and syndiotactic incorporation of the five membered repeat units is possible. With
chiral substrates, the microstructure can be even more complicated.
- 85 -
Whether regular or mixed structures are formed strongly depends on the applied catalyst system. The following schemes
show the addition of monomer to different catalysts and the consequences for the configuration of the double bond and
tacticity.
Fig. 11: Monomer addition in the polymerization of substituted norbornadienenes using a MAP-catalyst.
Fig. 12: Monomer addition to the 1st-generation Grubbs catalysts.
3 Chemicals, Equipment and Safety
Equipment:
Beaker 20 mL, Beaker 200 mL, heat gun, Schlenk flask 50 mL, suction filter, stirring bars, filter
paper, glas stopper, spatula, pipette, syringe, scintillation vials
Chemicals:
MW (g/mol)
Grubbs Catalyst 1st-gen. (RuCl2(PCy3)2CHPh) 822,96
5-Norbornen-2-yl-acetate 152,19
dichloromethane, methanol, ethyl vinyl ether, chloroform-d
3.1 Safety
Work under high vacuum bears the danger of imploding glasware and has to be done in closed fume
hoods. Ethyl vinyl ether as well as methanol are highly flamable and have to be protected from
- 86 -
ignition sources. The exposure of the chemicals used in this experiment to atmosphere must be
avoided. Dichloromethane and chloroform are suspected cancerogens. Methanol is toxic by any
exposure (skin, lung etc.). Norbornene and its derivates are flamable and have to be kept away from
ignition sources. Since other data for the used monomer is not available, it has to be considered as
highly dangerous. Prevent exposure and inhalation of the fumes. The applied ruthenium compound is
flamable and should be handled with great care. Avoid any contact with skin.
3.2 Experiment
Handling of the catalyst: The transition metal complex has to be stored in the fridge (2-8 °C).
Minimize its exposure to the atmosphere and/or humidity to prevent decomposition of this expensive
chemical. Before opening the bottle, it should reach room temperature to minimize water
condensation. Weighing should be carried out as quickly as possible and catalyst containers need to
be kept close when not used. Thus, dry glassware and solvents are required for this experiment. All
manipulations have to be conducted under a nitrogen atmosphere using Schlenk techniques.
The reaction vessel has be heated and evacuated to eliminate residual water and oxygen. 20 mL of
dry dichloromethane are added under a stream of nitrogen. The monomer (ca. 1.00 g, 3.29 mmol) is
added into the flask the same way. Use a scintillation vial for weighing and rinse thoroughly with dry
dichloromethane. Note the exact used amounts of catalyst and monomer. Now weigh in the catalyst
(ca. 54 mg, 0.0329 mmol, 1 mol-%) and dissolve in 2 mL dry dichloromethane. Transfer the solution
quickly and completely into a syringe. Add the catalyst solution as quickly as possible and in one
single shot into the heavily stirred reaction mixture. Close the flask with a stopper. The reaction is
being stirred for one hour at room temperature. After that time a small portion of the reaction mixture
(approx. 2 mL) is taken out by a syringe and added under heavy stirring to 20 mL of methanol. Note
your observations. To the rest of the reaction mixture 2 mL of ethyl vinyl ether is added. Stirr the
reaction for another 15 minutes. For isolation of the polymer, the reaction mixture has to be added
dropwise to heavily stirred 300 mL of methanol. The polymer should precipitate. After addition, stirr
for another 10 minutes and filter the product. Wash the polymer with some methanol. Residual
solvent is removed applying high vacuum. Use 10 mg of the dry polymer and dissolve it in 10 mL of
THF for GPC analysis. 20 mg of the dry polymer are dissolved in 0.6 mL of chloroform-d for NMR
analysis.
- 87 -
4 Questions
1. What was the visual difference you observed when precipitating the polymer for the first
and second time? Explain.
2. What is ethyl vinyl ether used for in this experiment and what is being formed after addition?
Write down the reaction equations for the reactions in this experiment and explain why
ethyl vinyl ether is a good candidate for the needed purpose. Would 1-pentene be an
alternative? Why/(not)?
3. Why has the catalyst solution to be added as quickly as possible? Clarify the role of
temperature, mixing and concentration of monomer solution in this regard.
4. Calculate the theoretical values for molecular weight of the synthesized polymer chains.
Compare them to the experimentally found values determined by GPC analysis. Explain any
deviations. Why, in general, can an experiment deliver much higher or smaller values
compared to the theoretical ones?
5. Do you see any possible way to reuse the catalyst? What is necessary to accomplish this?
6. Name some simple ways to prepare (in this experiment) polymers with higher solubility?
Name factors which play a crucial role.
7. Which influences can an applied catalyst system have on the reaction process and the
product? Why do expensive and sensitive systems still play an important role?
8. What is the striking structural feature of transition metal alkylidene complexes? What
significant difference would you expect from the NMR spectrum of a propagating species to
the parent catalyst?
9. Assign the observed signals you see in the 1H-NMR of the polymer and explain the
differences to the spectrum of the monomer.
88
Experiment 6: Emulsion Polymerization
Objective
Styrene is polymerized in an emulsion using dodecyl hydrogen sulfate sodium salt as an emulsifier and potassium persulfate as the initiator. Samples are drawn from the reactant solution in regular intervals in order to generate diagrams of the conversion as well as the reaction rate versus the reaction time.
References
1) H.‐G. Elias, Makromoleküle Bd. 1, Edition 6, Wiley‐VCH Verlag, Weinheim, 1999
2) P. J. Flory, Principles of Polymer Chemistry, Cornell, University Press, Ithaca, 1953
3) B. Tieke, Makromolekulare Chemie, Edition 2, Wiley‐VCH Verlag, Weinheim, 2005
4) W. V. Smith, H. Ewart, J. Chem. Phys. 16(6), 592 (1948)
5) W. D. Harkins, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 69, 1428 (1947)
Content
1. Theoretical Background
2. Experimental Part
3. Questions
89
1. Theoretical Background
The process of emulsion polymerization is of vital significance for the fabrication of various industrial
polymers such as polychloroprene, poly(vinyl acetate), polytetrafluoroethylene and poly(vinyl
chloride) as well as “cold rubber” (styrene/butadiene copolymers). The technological development
of this method started in the 1920s and has since gained ever‐increasing importance resulting in a
recent global production of several million tons per year.
The essential components of an emulsion polymerization are the following.
Monomer (insoluble in water)
Water
Surfactant
Initiator (radical forming agent, soluble in water)
In most cases anionic surfactants (e.g. salts of fatty acids, salts of alkyl hydrogen sulfates, salts of
alkyl sulfonic acids) are used, while cationic (quaternary ammonium salts, e.g. cetyltrimethyl
ammonium bromide) or non‐ionic surfactants (often high molecular weight) are rarely applied. All
types of surfactants comprise both hydrophilic and hydrophobic groups. When highly diluted, the
surfactants can be completely dissolved in water. However, at concentrations above the critical
micelle concentration (cmc), the molecules of the emulsifier aggregate into micelles. This process,
which is driven by thermodynamic principles, is accompanied by a significant drop in the surface
tension of the system. The emulsion polymerization is generally performed at surfactant
concentrations above the cmc.
Water‐soluble peroxo salts (e.g. potassium persulfate) are the classical choice for the initiator of the
polymerization reaction, even though organic hydroperoxides (e.g. cumene hydroperoxide) are also
frequently used. Redox initiators are of particular importance in industrial processes, since these
compounds can induce polymerization even at low temperatures.
The progress of a typical emulsion polymerization can be divided into three phases distinguished by
their characteristic profiles of the reaction rate over time (see Figure 1):
(I) increasing reaction rate
(II) constant reaction rate
(III) decreasing reaction rate.
Figure 1
transitio
Figure 1: D
Harkin a
processe
initial re
At the b
~4.3 nm
of mono
emulsifie
micelles
formed
the mice
number
emulsion
monome
no relev
polymer
monome
monome
limited
transform
of the re
1 further ill
on between t
Development o
s well as Sm
es occurring
servations, t
beginning of
) as well as m
omer, howev
er (see Figu
by diffusion
in this proce
elles. Howev
(~1010 per c
n) present in
er droplets a
vance due t
rization the
er molecules
er droplets
conditions).
m into so‐ca
eaction and t
ustrates tha
the first and
of the reaction
ith and Ewa
at a molec
the essential
f the polyme
micelles swo
ver, is initially
ure 2). Mon
n. The water
ess can, in p
ver, the reac
cm3 emulsio
n the system
and the mice
o the very
monomer i
s. This effec
leading to a
As a resu
alled latex pa
the reaction
at the surfa
the second p
rate (vp) and th
rts were the
ular level du
aspects of t
erization rea
ollen by mon
y bound in m
nomer mole
r‐soluble init
rinciple, star
ction is far le
n) is signific
m, which corr
elles. Polym
low concen
is depleted
ct is compen
a constant m
lt of the on
articles. Mor
rate increase
90
ace tension
phase.
he surface tens
first to prop
uring an em
these concep
action, the s
nomer incorp
monomer dr
ecules can b
tiator decom
rt a polymer
ess likely to
cantly lower
responds to
merization in
ntration of t
within the
nsated by mo
monomer co
ngoing polym
re and more
es.
of the syst
sion (γ) as a fun
pose correct
mulsion polym
pts are widel
system conta
poration (dia
oplets (diam
be transferre
mposes in the
rization eithe
begin within
than the am
a surface ar
the aqueou
the water‐in
micelles, w
onomers diff
oncentration
merization r
e polymer ch
em drastica
nction of the po
interpretatio
merization [4
y accepted t
ains “empty
ameter ~5 nm
meter ~1000
ed from the
e aqueous ph
er in the mo
n the monom
mount of mic
rea ratio of ~
s phase, on
soluble! mo
which each
fusing into t
in the nano
reaction, the
ains are star
ally increase
olymerization t
ons of the un
4, 5]. Desp
today.
y” micelles (
m). The vast
nm) stabilize
ese droplets
hase and the
nomer drop
mer droplets
celles (~1018
~1:1000 betw
the other ha
onomer. Du
contain aro
the micelles
o‐reactors (d
e micelles g
rted in this f
es at the
time (t).
nderlying
ite some
diameter
t amount
ed by the
into the
e radicals
lets or in
s, as their 8 per cm3
ween the
and, is of
uring the
ound 100
from the
diffusion‐
grow and
irst stage
Figure 2:
from [3]).
~~~ = su
When t
simultan
system i
concentr
increase
beginnin
polymer
is fully c
kinetics)
Howeve
which al
of the re
for poly
leading t
yet anot
question
The rem
following
Schematic illu
Legend: S = m
urfactant
the reaction
neously more
ncreases an
ration of fre
e in the surf
ng of phase
rization withi
compensate
.
r, when the
l the monom
eaction only
merization.
to a charact
ther increas
ns).
markable ind
g advantage
stration of dif
micelle swollen
n progresse
e (but smalle
d a higher a
ee surfactan
face tension
II of the re
in the latex p
d by the dif
e emulsion p
mer molecule
those mono
From this p
teristic declin
e in the rea
dustrial relev
s:
fferent particle
with monome
s further, t
er) latex part
mount of em
t, which wil
is noticeab
eaction, whic
particles. At
ffusion of n
polymerizatio
es bound in t
mer molecu
point onward
ne in the rea
action rate c
vance of th
91
es/aggregates i
er, L = latex par
the amoun
ticles are for
mulsifier is b
ll eventually
ble and there
ch is charac
t this stage t
ew monom
on progress
the monome
les already lo
ds the numb
action rate (
can be obse
he emulsion
involved in an
rticle, M = mon
t of mono
rmed. Cons
ound. This
fall below t
e are no fre
cterized by a
he consump
er from the
es even furt
er droplets a
ocated withi
ber of these
(first order k
erved towar
polymeriza
emulsion poly
nomer droplet,
mer drople
equently, th
leads to a st
the cmc. A
ee micelles l
a constant r
tion of mono
e monomer
ther, a poin
re consumed
n the latex p
e reactants c
kinetics). In
ds the end
tion proces
ymerization (r
, = monomer
ets decrease
e surface ar
teady decrea
At this point
left. This m
reaction rate
omer by the
droplets (ze
nt will be re
d. In this th
particles are
constantly d
some cases
of the reac
ss is a resu
reproduced
r molecule,
es, while
ea of the
ase in the
a strong
marks the
e for the
e reaction
ero order
ached at
ird phase
available
decreases
, though,
tion (see
lt of the
92
a) The aqueous phase enables temperature regulation during the polymerization reaction.
b) Redox initiators can be applied, which enable polymerization reactions to proceed at comparably
low temperatures, yet keeping the reaction rate relatively high.
c) High degrees of polymerization can be achieved due to the small probability of chain termination.
This can be further regulated by the controlled addition of chain transfer agents.
d) Remaining monomer can be removed by steam distillation.
e) The obtained latex can be directly subjected to further applications (paints, glues, coatings).
On the downside, however, a frequently problematic extraction of the emulsifier as well as the
potentially high degree of branching of the polymer chains have to be taken into account as major
disadvantages of the method.
Kinetics and Mechanism
A hallmark of the emulsion polymerization process is that this method yields higher degrees of
polymerization than those accessible under comparable conditions in bulk or suspension
polymerization reactions. The kinetics and the mechanism of emulsion polymerization are,
therefore, distinct from other radical polymerization methods. The reaction rate vw(L) in an individual
latex particle is given by equation (1).
(1) [M][P*]k)(v Ww L
vw(L): reaction rate of the polymerization in the latex particle
kw: rate constant of the polymerization
[M]: concentration of monomer in the latex particle
[P*]: concentration of radicals in the latex particle
The measurable reaction rate vw of the entire reaction batch is represented by the sum of the
reaction rates in all isolated latex particles. Assuming a narrow size distribution of the latex particles
the reaction rate can be described as follows:
93
(2) A
wwN
nN[M]kv
vw: reaction rate of the polymerization
n: average number of free radicals per latex particle
N: number of latex particles per unit volume of the emulsion
NA: Avogadro constant
In equation (2), it is further assumed that the polymerization occurs exclusively within the latex
particles, i.e. there is no considerable amount of polymer forming either in the aqueous phase or in
the monomer droplets. For the determination of vW the factors included in equation (2) have to be
expressed as properties, which are experimentally accessible. This is particularly difficult in the case
of N and n. The most established quantitative model for the description of the kinetics and the
mechanism of the emulsion polymerization was derived by Smith and Ewart. It is particularly well‐
suited for systems showing a behavior consistent with the Harkin model.
The Harkin model is based on the following considerations: After a short phase of particle generation
(phase I) the reaction rate becomes constant in phase (II). Therefore, regarding the factors included
in equation (2), not only the monomer concentration [M] and the number of latex particles per unit
volume [N], but also the number of free radicals within the latex particles have to be constant.
However, according to the steady state approximation the number of these radicals will only remain
constant, when equal amounts of radicals are formed and consumed in a given period of time.
The following assumptions will be made: Once a radical is located within a latex particle, it cannot
leave this environment again. If a second radical enters the same latex particle, an immediate
recombination of the two will take place due to the small radius of the latex particle. An individual
latex particle, therefore, contains either one or no radical at any given time, corresponding to an
average number of radicals per latex particle of n = ½. With additional assumptions regarding the
number of latex particles equation (3) can be derived:
(3) 5
3
S5
2
A
ww [S])(a)N
σb(
2
1[M]kv
b: system constant in the range of 0.37‐0.53
σ: inflow/intake velocity of the radical into the latex particle
µ: constant volume increase of the latex particle
94
aS: surface area required by one surfactant molecule
[S]: concentration of the emulsifier
Combining all constant parameters included in equation (3) into a single constant K leads to a
simplified representation as given by equation (4):
(4) 5
3
w K[M]([S])v
On closer examination of equation (4) it becomes obvious, that the reaction rate of the emulsion
polymerization can be raised even without increasing the temperature, monomer concentration or
initiator concentration – simply by adding a higher amount of the surfactant.
The degree of polymerization Pn of a polymerization reaction is defined as the ratio between the sum
of all reaction rates associated with processes leading to an increase in the chain length and the sum
of reaction rates ascribed to those processes resulting in the termination of an individual chain. The
latter can occur either by direct termination or by chain transfer to monomer, solvent, or initiator
molecules (but not to polymer chains!).
(5) )v(v
vP
TA
wn
vA: sum of the reaction rates of all processes terminating the chain
vT: sum of the rates of all chain transfer reactions
As the concentration of the emulsifier directly influences vw, it also has an immediate effect on the
degree of polymerization. In contrast to all other radical polymerization processes, the
recombination of radical chain ends is inhibited in emulsion polymerization, since the chains exist in
isolated latex particles and are therefore effectively separated from each other.
Moreover, in its final stages the process of emulsion polymerization shows a behavior analogous to
the Norrish‐Trommsdorf effect, which is known from bulk polymerization. As a result, the reaction
rate and the degree of polymerization are comparably higher.
95
2. Experimental Part
The goal of this experiment is to prepare polystyrene by polymerization of styrene in emulsion. For
that purpose, dodecyl hydrogen sulfate sodium salt and potassium persulfate are used as the
surfactant and initiator, respectively. Plots of the conversion as well as the reaction rate versus the
reaction time should be obtained. The conversion is determined gravimetrically at various stages of
the reaction. The results shall be discussed with a special emphasis on the kinetics of the reaction.
Chemicals:
‐ Styrene (destabilized and freshly distilled)
‐ Water
‐ Dodecyl hydrogen sulfate sodium salt
‐ Potassium persulfate
‐ Hydroquinone (0.02% in water)
Equipment:
‐ Oil bath
‐ Round‐bottomed flask
‐ Hot‐plate magnetic‐stirrer device
‐ Reflux condenser
‐ Thermometer
‐ Magnetic stirring bars
‐ Sample dishes
‐ Glass vials
‐ Syringes and needles
‐ Plastic pipettes
‐ Analytical balance
‐ Vacuum drying oven
Procedure:
Water (50 mL), emulsifier (1 g) and styrene (5 g) are filled into a round‐bottomed flask of 100 mL
capacity. The mixture is heated to 70°C under stirring in an oil bath. After an equilibration period of
approximately 30 minutes the polymerization is started by the addition of the initiator dissolved in 4
96
mL water (t = 0 min). During the course of the next two hours, samples of 2 mL reactant solution
each are drawn in regular intervals according to the specifications in table 1.
Table 1. Sample identifier and reaction time at which the sample was taken.
Sample
identifier E1 E2 E3 E4 E5 E6 E7 E8 E9 E10 E11
t/min 2 4 6 10 15 20 30 45 60 90 120
These samples are immediately pipetted into glass vials containing 2 mL hydroquinone solution for
stabilization and are subsequently transferred to a vacuum drying oven to remove all volatile
components. Afterwards, the solid content is determined by gravimetric analysis. All relevant
masses and mass differences are calculated and documented according to table 2.
Table 2. Evaluation of the obtained sample weights and determination of the conversion.
Sample
identifier
m0
(dish)
m1
(dish +
hydroquinone)
m2
(dish +
hydroquinone
+ dispersion
before
drying)
m2‐m1
(msample)
m3
(dish +
dispersion
after drying)
m3‐m0
(msolid)
Conversion
E1
E2
E3
E4
E5
E6
E7
E8
E9
E10
E11
Evaluation:
Plots of conversion versus time.
1) Besides the polymer molecules the isolated solid additionally contains residual emulsifier. In order
to determine the conversion (conv) of the reaction accurately, the surfactant content has to be
97
subtracted from the total weight of the solid material. This calculation can be performed according
to the following equation:
conv = msolid
mM0
· 1
1+ mE0
mM0
· mtot
msample
·100%
msolid: weight of the solid
mE0: weight of emulsifier used in the reaction batch
mM0: weight of monomer used in the reaction batch
mtot: total weight of the reaction batch
msample: weight of the sample
2) Calculate conversions for all samples taken during the reaction and plot the results over the
reaction time.
Plots of reaction rate versus time.
3) Determine the reaction rates at the various time steps by constructing tangents on the conversion
vs. time curve. List the obtained reaction rates in a table, plot and discuss the results.
98
3. Questions
1) Which effects can be potentially caused by the presence of oxygen traces in the emulsion? What
could be an explanation for another increase in the reaction rate during the final stages of the
polymerization (Take into account that the reaction is a radical polymerization)?
2) Why is the coagulation of latex particles inhibited?
3) What is the average radical concentration in the latex particles under the following assumptions?
The radicals reach the latex particles by diffusion. This process determines the reaction rate.
Whenever two radicals are located in the same latex particle they will recombine
immediately.
4) Describe the principle of a redox initiator and list a number of examples.
5) Compare the characteristics of emulsion polymerization and suspension polymerization. Name
further examples for technologically relevant polymerization procedures.
1
Versuch 6
Electropolymerization of Conducting Polymers
Assignment of tasks:
1. The theoretical and experimental aspects of the electrochemistry and electropolymerization of
conducting polymers shall be mediated.
2. Voltammetry is introduced as a tool for the synthesis of polythiophene films
3. The electrochromic behavior of an electropolymerised PEDOT film is studied by means of
charging/ discharging cycles.
4. A consistent analysis and evaluation of electrochemical data shall be performed to gain access to
the values of the HOMO and LUMO levels
References:
[1] György Inzelt, Conducting Polymers - A New Era in Electrochemistry, 2nd Edition, Springer, 2012.
[2] Jürgen Heinze, Bernardo A. Frontana-Uribe, and Sabine Ludwigs, Electrochemistry of Conducting
Polymers - Persistent Models and New Concepts, Chem. Rev., 2010, 110, 4724–4771.
[3] Matthias Rehahn., Elektrisch Leitfähige Kunststoffe, Chemie unserer Zeit 2003, 37, 18-30.
[4] Alan MacDiarmid, Synthetische Metalle: eine neue Rolle für organische Polymere, Angew. Chem.,
2001, 113, 2649-2659.
[5] Jean-Luc Bredas and G.Brian Street, Polarons, bipolarons, and solitons in conducting polymers, Acc.
Chem. Res. 1985, 18, 309–315.
[6] Allen J. Bard and Larry R. Faulkner, Electrochemical Methods – Fundamentals and Applications, John
Wiley & Sons ; 2nd Edition., 2001.
[7] Carl H. Hamann and Wolf Vielstich, Elektrochemie, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 4th Edition,
2005.
2
1. Theoretical Background 1.1 Conducting polymers
In the year 2000 the scientists Alan G. MacDiarmid, Alan J. Heeger, and Hideki Shirakawa received the
Nobel Prize in chemistry for their discovery and development of conducting polymers (CPs). Their
discovery of the electrical conductivity of the organic material polyacetylene upon doping with iodine
was the key step in the modern development of conducting polymer science. From the late 1970s up to
now a variety of new CPs (Figure 1) has been introduced based on different monomers like pyrroles,
thiophenes, anilines or aromatic hydrocarbons.
Figure 1: Structures of common conducting polymers; polyacetylene 1, poly(paraphenylenevinylene) 2, polythiophene 3, polypyrrole 4, polyaniline 5
The important features which all of them share are alternating π- and σ-bonds along the polymer
backbone resulting in a π-conjugation. The electronic structure and the electronic properties of
conjugated polymers can be explained by the molecular orbital model. In ethylene two sp2 hybridized
carbons combine resulting in an occupied π- and an unoccupied π*-orbital, as shown in Figure 2.
Interaction with a uniform π-bond results in a splitting of the orbitals. A polymer with n sp2 hybridized
carbons has likewise n/2 π- and n/2 π*-orbitals, the distance in-between them is negligible and so they
can be described as bands. Also the distance between the highest occupied π- (HOMO, also Valence
Band, VB, in analogy to the band theory) and the lowest unoccupied π*-orbital (LUMO, also Conduction
Band, CB) which is called band gap (Eg) decrease with increasing number of repeating units.
3
Figure 2: Schematic explanation of the formation of energy bands in conjugated polymers: Transition from the atomic orbital of an individual sp2 carbon atom to the molecular orbitals of ethylene and finally formation of the band structure in polyacetylene. [3]
As Eg is still so large, that electrons cannot easily be promoted from the Valence Band to the Conduction
band just by thermal energy at room temperature, conjugated polymers are semi-conductors or
insulators in the neutral state. However, upon oxidation (extraction of an electron, formation of a radical
cation, Figure 3, right) or reduction (uptake of an electron, formation of a radical anion, Figure 3 left) the
conductivity of such materials is dramatically increased. The oxidation and reduction process is often
called p- and n-doping process, respectively. Thus, conductive polymers are often called p-type (hole
transport) or n-type (electron transport) semi-conductors.
Figure 3: Structure of a neutral polythiophene (middle) as well as a radical cation (oxidized form, right) and radical anion (reduced form, left).
4
During oxidation electrons are extracted from the HOMO. On the other hand, the reduction of the
polymer is coupled to an uptake of electrons by the LUMO. In both cases, i.e. upon reduction and
oxidation, charges are generated due to the uptake/extraction of electrons. Therefore, the reduction and
oxidation process is often called charging.
In the literature the term polaron is also found for the mono-ionic forms (radical cation and radical
anion) and bipolaron is used for di-ionic forms. These charged species (radical mono-anion and di-ion;
polaron and bipolaron) are stabilized through a delocalization of the charge/electron over the
conjugated π-system of several monomer units of the polymer. The neutral form exhibits a benzoid-like
structure, whereas the charged states reveal a quinoid-like structure (Figure 4a). Thus, in the doped
polymer both structures are present. This change in the electronic structure is followed by a geometric
reorganization which causes a local upward shift (Δε) of the HOMO and downward shift of LUMO levels,
respectively, see Figure 4b, which results in a decrease of the band gap. This may also serve as an
explanation for the increased conductivity.
Figure 4: a) chemical structure of the neutral state, polaron and bipolaron of polythiophene, b) change of the electronic structure upon doping
As the color of a conducting polymer is defined by the band gap (absorption correlates to an excitation of
an electron from the HOMO to the LUMO), the change of the band gap will also evoke a color change.
Thus, conducting polymers are electrochromic materials.
Electrochromic materials are compounds that undergo a color change upon switching the redox-state of
the species. A variety of organic compounds show electrochromic behavior. For example, molecular
based materials that show electrochromism are viologens or metal complexes based on phthalocyanine
ligands. In particular polythiophenes and polyanilines are widely used as materials for electrochromic
devices due to their high stability and simple preparation as well as their well-established processability.
5
The optical properties of these materials can be tuned by the choice of appropriate thiophene or aniline
monomers.
Typical colors of a polythiophene film in the neutral and the p-doped state (oxidized form) are red and
blue/green, respectively. Polymers based on PEDOT (poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)) are of particular
interest because of their low oxidation potentials (high lying HOMO level) as well as their transparency
and high conductivity (hole transport) in the p-doped state. PEDOT polymers are often used in
electrochromic displays, namely in the form of the complex PEDOT:PSS (PSS = polystyrenesulfonate). In
this material PEDOT is present in its oxidized form. The polyanion PSS acts as stabilizer in the complex
with the p-doped PEDOT and ensures electroneutrality. In addition, the PSS part ensures the formation
of a stable aqueous dispersion of this complex which makes it an industrially applicable and solution-
processable form of PEDOT. Because of its high conductivity and transparency (transmission of light is
possible) PEDOT:PSS has found its application as printable electrode in organic solar cells for example.
Organic electrochromic materials have already been applied in anti-glare car rearview mirrors, in
controllable light reflective/transmissive devices, protective eyewear, smart windows (used in
automotive industry and buildings) and sunglasses. One interesting and promising application is the use
as long-term display of information due to the low energy demand of such types of displays.
1.2 Voltammetry / Electropolymerization
Voltammetry:
Voltammetry is one of the most common electroanalytical methods to study the redox-behavior of
electro-active compounds. In particular, cyclic voltammetry (also linear sweep voltammetry) has been
proven as a versatile tool for the characterization of electro-active species in aqueous and non-aqueous
solvents. The electro-active species can be either dissolved in the electrolyte or be present in the solid
state.
In a cyclic voltammetric experiment a linear potential scan with a constant scan rate (v) is performed in a
certain potential window. At the end of the potential window (Eλ) the sign of the scan direction is
inverted and the potential is linearly decreased (with the same v) until the start potential is reached
again (Figure 5 a): the potential cycle is “closed”. During this potential sweep, the current is recorded and
plotted vs. the applied potential. A typical I-E curve, a so called cyclic voltammogram, of a dissolved
redox-species is depicted in Figure 5 b).
From the corresponding I-E curves several characteristic data are obtained:
redox-potentials (thermodynamic parameters) and
peak currents (diffusion coefficients, kinetic parameters, etc.)
6
Figure 5: a) Cyclic potential sweep and b) resulting cyclic voltammogram in the presence of a redox-active species in solution (voltammogram for the simplest electron transfer reaction: A A+ + e-)
The formal potential can be estimated from the half wave potential E1/2 by determining the peak
potentials of the oxidation ( ) and reduction (
) in the forward and backward scan, respectively, in
the I-E curve (Figure 5 b) according to eq. (1)
|
|
This value is an excellent approximation for the formal potential: E1/2 = E0
The measurements are conducted with a three electrode setup (Figure 6) which consists of a stationary
working electrode (WE), a counter electrode (CE, also known as auxiliary electrode) and a reference
electrode (RE). The redox-active species is present in solution or deposited as film on the working
electrode (in the case of polymers). The use of a reference electrode allows the potential control. The
experiment is controlled and monitored by a potentiostat. The potential of the working electrode against
the counter electrode is carefully controlled by the potentiostat, so that the potential difference ΔE
between the working electrode and the reference electrode is precisely defined and corresponds to the
potential value specified by the user. The current flows between the WE and CE.
The reference electrode is important to define the point of origin of the potential scale. Standardized
reference electrodes as the standard (or normal) hydrogen electrode (SHE or NHE), the saturated
calomel electrode (SCE), or the Ag/AgCl (silver chloride coated silver wire immersed into a KCl solution)
system consist of a redox couple of a known concentration in a separated electrolyte filled compartment
connected to the main cell via a semi-permeable membrane. Here, the potential depends only on the
concentration of the redox-active couple (e.g. Ag/Ag+). However, these real reference electrodes (also
known as second order electrodes) with a defined potential are only available for aqueous systems. In
𝐸𝑝𝑜𝑥
𝐸𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑑
t
switching time λ
a)
E / V
I / A
=
b)
E1/2 = E0
7
organic solvents pseudo reference electrodes as an AgCl covered silver wire are commonly used. As the
potential of these is not well defined, IUPAC recommends for organic solvents to measure an external
standard. Here the standard redox-couple ferrocene/ferrocenium (Fc/Fc+) is added, measured and all
potentials are reported against it (see, rit ner . ta J. Recommendations on reporting electrode
potentials in nonaqueous solvents Pure Appl. Chem. 1984 56 461−466). This calibration allows the
comparison of different experiments conducted in different solvent systems and with different reference
electrodes.
Figure 6: Three electrode setup for cyclic voltammetric experiments.
To ensure charge transport in solution a supporting electrolyte is necessary. The electrolyte has to be
electrochemically inert for a broad potential window and should be chemically stable (reactions with
oxidized/reduced species must be avoided). Typically tetra-alkylammonium salts are used as cations. As
anions ClO4-, BF4
-, and PF6- are commonly employed. Furthermore, the supporting electrolyte ensures the
electroneutrality in the diffusion layer in front of the working electrode (the diffusion layer corresponds
to the volume in which the oxidation/reduction takes place). In case of redox-active films, counter ions
are incorporated in the electro-active material during oxidation/reduction which also results in volume
changes of the films.
8
Electropolymerization:
Cyclic voltammetry is a powerful tool for the synthesis (electropolymerization) and characterization of
conducting polymers. A typical anodic electropolymerization takes place via a step-wise coupling of
radical cations. In particular, the electrodeposition of aromatic systems like thiophene or pyrrole has
been extensively studied. The oxidation of such monomers 1 (Figure 7) leads to the formation of radical
cations 2 followed by dimerization 3 and proton elimination. This leads to a neutral dimer 4. Longer π-
conjugated systems are oxidized at lower potentials than the monomer, therefore the dimer 4 gets
oxidized immediately. Then the same reaction cascade is repeated: The oxidized dimer 5 reacts with
other radical cations and the formation of oligomers 6 takes place. Recent studies propose that the rate
determining step seems to be the elimination of protons rather than the dimerization step. This
mechanism is widely accepted in literature. One of the best models for the polymer growth mechanism
is the so called oligomer-approach. This mechanism proposes that dimerization rates of radical cations of
the same conjugation length are higher than those of coupling products of radical cations with different
conjugation lengths. Hence, the formation of dimers, tetramers and octamers is favored.
The larger the conjugation length the easier the oxidation and, thus, the lower the oxidation potential:
the polymer is oxidized at potentials smaller than the oxidation potential of the monomer unit (see
Figure 7). When the oligomers reach a certain length, the deposition onto the electrode surface takes
place. Further polymer growth includes now several steps under solid-state conditions. All these steps
are taking place as soon as the monomer oxidation potential is reached, and so the polymer oxidation
signal is observable already in the second cycle. Obviously, the peak current of the polymer increases
with increasing number of cycles: the polymer film grows. Voltammetric methods can be used to induce
and follow the polymer growth.
Figure 7: Electropolymerization of polythiophenes, a) cyclic voltammogram of the anodic polymerization of a thiophene derivative under potentiodynamic conditions (first cycle in red), b) reaction mechanism of the anodic polymerization of thiophene.
9
During the potentiodynamic growth of the film, the polymer is oxidized and reduced (to the neutral
form) in each potential cycle which means that the polymer can be obtained as neutral film (the
polymerization stops at a potential lower than the polymer oxidation) on the electrode.
Electrochemical Characterization:
The electrochemical characterization of conducting polymer films deposited on electrodes can be
performed by means of cyclic voltammetric experiments in monomer-free electrolyte. Thus, an influence
of the monomer and further polymer growth can be excluded. Polymers show very broad oxidation and
reduction signals because no longer an one electron process in a small and uniform molecule, but
instead multiple electron processes (polaron, bipolarone) in a non-uniform material (polymerization
degree, different length of effective π-conjugation …) are taking place. The resulting curve can be
described as an overlapping of many redox-events with slightly different redox-potentials, as it is implied
by the grey curves in Figure 8, which could be summed up giving the measured curve (black) of the
oxidation of P3HT (poly(3-hexylthiophene). Hence, the determination of E1/2 is no longer possible and the
onset potential of the oxidation Eoxonset is determined instead by the interception of the two tangents
(blue lines) at the initial slope of the peak. It is assumed that the onset potential value corresponds to
the oxidation/reduction of the polymer chains with the largest conjugated π-system.
Figure 8: Typical CV of a polymer film (here, P3HT (poly(3-hexylthiophene), black curve) and potential depending conductance behaviour (red curve). In grey the overlapping of many different oxidation waves are schematically shown. The interception of the two tangents (blue lines) at the initial slope of the peak current corresponds to Eox
onset.
From the onset potential values of the oxidation and reduction, the HOMO and LUMO levels,
respectively, of the polymer can be calculated according to equations (2) and (3) (see, C. M. Cardona et
10
al. Electrochemical Considerations for Determining Absolute Frontier Orbital Energy Levels of Conjugated
Polymers for Solar Cell Applications, Adv. Mater., 2011, 23, 2367–2371):
[ ]
( )[ ]
The value 5.1 corresponds to the formal potential of Fc/Fc+ in the Fermi scale. From the HOMO and
LUMO level, the electrochemical band gap can be estimated according to eq. (4), which is a critical
quantity for polymer based organic photovoltaics.
| |
11
2. Experiment
Equipment and General Methods:
For all experiments a PGSTAT101 potentiostat from Metrohm and a gas-tight full glass three electrode
cell containing an ITO covered glass slide as working electrode, a Pt plate as counter electrode and a AgCl
covered Ag-wire acting as the reference electrode are used. All manipulations are carried out under
nitrogen atmosphere using standard Schlenk techniques. Solvents are pre-dried and should be handled
under nitrogen atmosphere.
Chemicals:
10 ml of a 0.1 M NBu4PF6/MeCN solution (NBu4PF6: M = 387.43 g/mol),
3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene (EDOT) (M = 142.18 g/mol ρ = 1.331 g/mL), CAUTION: EDOT is toxic!
pure acetonitrile, acetone
Electrodeposition:
Two electrochemical cells equipped with a reference electrode are filled with 10 ml of a 0.1 M
NBu4PF6/acetonitrile solution by means of a syringe under nitrogen atmosphere. The electrolyte solution
is deaerated by nitrogen bubbling for approximately 5 min. Then the monomer is added via a syringe
into one of the cells (c = 0.01 M). The working and counter electrode are carefully placed in the middle of
the cell (Note: the working electrode should be placed near the reference electrode to minimize the
effect of an uncompensated IR-drop, an error that is based on the resistance in the electrolyte solution).
- For the potentiodynamic electropolymerization of EDOT, potential cycles in a specified range and scan
rate are performed. The precise values are given by the supervisor and need to be noted for the later
evaluation of the data. The peak maximum in the forward scan of the first cycle corresponds to the
oxidation potential Eox of the monomer unit. After all cycles have been performed, the polymer covered
electrode is removed and washed gently with pure acetonitrile.
HOMO/LUMO determination:
For the voltammetric characterization of a polythiophene film, cyclic voltammetry in monomer-free
solution is applied. The cell prepared without monomer is used. The studied polymer film consists of
chemically synthesized Poly-(3-hexylthiophene) (P3HT) deposited on a gold electrode via spin coating.
For the determination of the onset potentials of the oxidation and reduction and thus the HOMO and
LUMO levels three cycles in a specified range and scan rate are performed. The precise values are given
12
by the supervisor and need to be noted for the later evaluation of the data. The first cycle is neglected to
avoid artefacts due to memory effects. The values for the onset potentials are extracted of the 2nd or 3rd
cycle.
Electrochromism:
The electrochromic-behavior of PEDOT shall be analyzed. PEDOT is blue in its neutral and transparent in
its oxidized state. Here, the time which is needed for the film to be totally switched from the one to the
other state shall be determined. For that purpose a positive and a negative potential is repeatedly
applied to the film and the current-time-slopes are recorded. As soon as the current stops flowing the
reaction in finished and the polymer film reaches the fully neutral or oxidized state. The optical
impression upon visual inspection (full conversion to the transparent state or not) should be noted.
After all electrochemical experiments have been performed the ferrocene standard is measured.
Therefore, a blank gold electrode is mounted in the cell and a small amount of ferrocene is added to the
electrolyte solution. For the determination of the formal potential of Fc/Fc+ the potential is cycled
between -0.1 to 0.7 V. For a consistent data set, at least three cycles (with stirring of the solution
between the single cycles) should be performed.
13
3. Evaluation of experimental data
Give a detailed introduction in the principle of voltammetry and describe the setup with all components.
Why is the Ferrocen measurement necessary? Also, describe in detail the experimental procedure with
all parameters.
3.1 Polymerization
a) Determine the E1/2 of Fc/Fc+ of all measured cycles and build the average value out of this. For
evaluation of all your measured cyclic voltammograms substract E1/2 from the measured
potentials and plot all x-scales as E vs. Fc/Fc+.
b) Plot the I/E-curve of the potentiodynamic polymerization. Describe the curve and assign the
regions in the CV to processes happening. Draw and discuss in this context the mechanism of the
oxidative polymerization of EDOT.
3.2 Determination of the HOMO and LUMO levels
a) Estimate the onset potential values of the oxidation and reduction of P3HT according to the
protocol depicted in Figure 8. Give also an explanation why it’s not possible to determine E1/2 of
conducting polymers.
b) Calculate the HOMO and LUMO levels as well as the band gap according to equations (2)-(4).
3.3 Analysis of the electrochromic behavior of PEDOT
a) Describe the optical impression which was observed during the charging/ discharging cycles.
b) Plot the current-time curves obtained during the charging/discharging of the PEDOT film and
discuss in detail the influence of the switching times.
14
4. Questions
a) Only for chemistry students: Describe a chemical method for the synthesis of a polythiophene
polymer based on a transition metal complex catalyzed reaction (draw the reaction scheme in
which the structure of the monomer and the resulting polymer shall become clear as well as the
catalytic cycle!).
b) Draw the molecular structure of PEDOT:PSS (poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):
polystyrenesulfonate) in its quinoid stabilized form. In which form is the polystyrenesulfonate
present? Name at least two applications of this conducting polymer.
c) Describe a detailed buildup of a polymer electrochromic window.
d) P3HT is a common donor material in donor-acceptor based organic solar cells. The acceptor
material is often composed of a fullerene derivative (typically PCBM =[6,6]-Phenyl C61 butyric
acid methyl ester). Draw a sketch of a polymer based organic solar cell. Draw an energy diagram
containing the HOMO and LUMO levels of the donor and acceptor material.
Rheology
1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 2
2 Theoretical foundation .................................................................................................................. 2
2.1 Fundamental terms in rheology.............................................................................................. 2
2.2 Linear-viscoelastic behavior ................................................................................................. 4
2.3 Measuring technique ........................................................................................................... 7
2.3.1 Oscillation measurements ........................................................................................ 7
2.3.2 Rotational experiments ............................................................................................ 8
2.3.3 Tension experiment .............................................................................................. 10
2.3.4 Relaxation experiment ........................................................................................... 10
2.4 Borderline behavior of matter and rheological models .............................................................. 10
2.4.1 Elastic behavior ................................................................................................... 11
2.4.2 Plastic behavior .................................................................................................... 12
2.4.3 Viscous behavior .................................................................................................. 13
2.4.4 Viscoelastic behavior ............................................................................................ 14
2.4.5 Characterization by flow and viscosity curves ............................................................ 16
2.5 Time-dependent rheological behavior ................................................................................... 17
2.6 Rheometry (measuring technique) ........................................................................................ 18
3 Experimental ............................................................................................................................ 19
3.1 Conduction of rotational measurements ................................................................................. 19
3.2 Time-dependent change of viscosity ..................................................................................... 20
3.3 Oscillation measurements to determine the viscoelastic behavior ............................................... 20
4 Questions ................................................................................................................................. 21
5 Literature ................................................................................................................................. 21
- 2 -
1 Introduction
Rheology is the science which describes, explains, quantifies and applies the phenomena appearing
while bodies or liquids are deformed or while they flow. According to Ziabicki [1], the rheological
behavior is responsible for the drawability and thus of fundamental importance for the spinnability of
liquid systems. Further examples of applied rheology are found in various areas in natural science
and engineering. [2-7]
1. Colors and varnish (brushability, storage)
2. Polymer solutions and melts (polymer extrusion and spinning
3. Characterization of polymers (statement about molecular weights and molecular weight
distribution
4. Manufacture of high performance materials (ceramics)
5. Flow behavior of food (ketchup, convenience sauce)
6. Cosmetics and sanitary products (tooth paste, cream, shampoos)
7. Geo-rheology (simulation of volcanic flow)
8. Medicine (hemorheology)
9. Pharmaceutical products
10. Electronics
In the following paragraphs the basic principles of rheology, which are described in literature [1 –
20] are addressed.
2 Theory
2.1 Fundamental terms in rheology
To characterize the flow behavior of substances, they are subjected to defined forces and the
resulting deformations are described in detail in dependence of different parameters. Depending on
the direction of the affecting force, the relevant cases for rheometry are distinguished: elongation,
compression strain and shear strain. The effect occurring during the shear experiment of a liquid and
the associated fundamental terms in rheology can be explained with the aid of a two-plate-model
(Figure 1). In this model a liquid is located between two parallel plates of the area A. The upper plate
is moved relative to the lower static plate with a constant velocity. Thereby the power F needs to be
applied due to the internal friction. This shear strain causes a laminar flow of the velocity v which
linearly decreases from the moving to the static plate.
- 3 -
Fig.1: Two-plate-model. The resulting shear rate gradient is also called deformation velocity or shear velocity:
γγ==
=
=
dtd
dydx
dtd
dtdx
dyd
dydv
(1)
velocity gradient = shear rate
Deformation: αγ tan=≡dydx
[-] (2)
Deformation velocity: dtdγγ ≡ [1/s] (3)
When the force applied during the shearing experiment is related to the plate area A, the shear stress
τ is obtained, which is connected with the deformation velocity γ by the shear viscosity η.
Shear stress: γητ ⋅==AF
[Pa] (4)
Stationary shear viscosity: γτη
≡ [Pa·s] (5)
According to the dependence of the stationary shear viscosity on the shear rate, flow behavior can be
characterized as Newtonian, shear thinning and shear thickening (dilatant). Newtonian flow
behavior is present, when the viscosity is independent of the shear rate. If the viscosity decreases
with increasing shear rate, the behavior is called shear thinning, this is typical for polymer melts
- 4 -
and polymer solutions. When the viscosity increases with increasing shear rate the flow behavior is
referred to as shear thickening. Examples of viscosity curves are given in 2.4.5.
For a Newtonian liquid, a direct proportionality exists between shear stress and deformation rate,
whereas for an ideal Hook-type body a direct proportionality between shear stress and deformation is
present, i.e. Hook’s law is in force. The proportionality constant is the modulus of shear G:
Shear stress: γτ ⋅= G [Pa] (6) It should be noted, that also elastic systems exist which to not apply to Hook’s law (e. g. rubbery-
elastic materials). A general definition of elastic behavior is given in 2.4.1.
2.2 Linear-viscoelastic behavior
Many materials do not show exclusively viscous or elastic behavior but a combination of these
characteristics. This is referred to as viscoelastic behavior. The theory of linear viscoelasticity
describes the rheological phenomena of polymer solutions and melts, which is connected to the
preservation of the resting structure/state of the temporary network of entangled molecular chains.
The theory of non-linear viscoelasticity describes viscoelastic phenomena, which are connected with
depletion of the temporary network structure. The rheological material value functions for describing
linear viscoelasticity are determined with the aid of oscillatory experiments. Thereby, the latent state
of the sample is not disturbed, which permits to separately display viscous and elastic behavior. At a
deformation-controlled oscillatory measurement, the sample, which is located in a gap between two
plates, is loaded by a periodic deformation γ(t) and thereby a periodic strain τ(t) is induced, which
shows a displacement of phase δ relative to the preset deformation.
preset deformation resulting strain (response of the system)
}cos{0 t⋅⋅= ωγγ }cos{0 δωττ +⋅⋅= t ω radial frequency of the oscillation [rad/s] 𝜏0 strain amplitude [Pa] 𝛾0 deformation amplitude [-] Based on the displacement of phase δ, rheological behavior can be classified:
• elastic behavior: 0=δ
- 5 -
• viscous behavior: 2πδ =
• viscoelastic behavior: 20 πδ <<
Fig. 2: Course of strain and deformation during oscillatory measurements. To simplify rheological calculations, complex values are introduced. The transition to complex
values is performed by extending strain and deformation with the respective imaginary part. This
allows the transition from trigonometric functions to the complex e-function, thus simplifying
calculations considerably. The following rheological values are defined:
Complex shear strain:
)}(exp{})sin{}(cos{* 00 δωτδωδωττ +⋅⋅⋅=+⋅⋅++⋅≡ titit (7) Complex deformation:
}exp{})sin{}(cos{* 00 titit ⋅⋅⋅=⋅⋅+⋅≡ ωγωωγγ (8) Complex deformation velocity:
}exp{*)(* 0 tiidtd
⋅⋅⋅⋅⋅=≡ ωγωγγ (9)
Viscoelastic behavior can be described by the complex modulus G*, which is defined as the quotient
of complex strain and complex deformation.
- 6 -
Complex modulus:
'''}exp{***
0
0 GiGiG ⋅+=⋅⋅=≡ δγτ
γτ
(10)
Here, G’ is the storage modulus and G’’ is the loss modulus. The storage modulus represents the
degree of elastic behavior, i.e. the energy, which is reversibly stored by restoring forces. The loss
modulus represents the amount of viscous behavior, i.e. the energy which irreversibly dissipated due
to viscous flow. For G’ and G’’ applies:
Storage modulus: δγτ cos'
0
0 ⋅=G [Pa] (11)
Loss modulus: δγτ sin''
0
0 ⋅=G [Pa] (12)
The ratio of loss and storage modulus is the dissipation factor 𝑡𝑎𝑛(𝛿):
Dissipation factor: '"tan
GG
≡δ [-] (13)
The dissipation factor is used to estimate, whether the viscous or elastic behavior is dominating. The
following classification is used:
• tan δ < 1: elastic behavior dominates
• tan δ > 1: viscous behavior dominates
Based on equation (10), it accounts for the absolute value of the complex modulus:
0
022 '''*γτ
=+= GGG [Pa] (14)
The absolute value of the complex modulus corresponds to the ratio of stress amplitude and
deformation amplitude.
The viscoelastic behavior may also be described with help of the complex viscosity η*, which is
defined as the quotient of complex sheer stress τ* and complex deformation velocity *γ .
Complex viscosity:
- 7 -
'''*}exp{***
0
0 ηηω
δγω
τγτη ⋅−=
⋅=⋅⋅
⋅⋅=≡ i
iGi
i (15)
η’ is a measure for the viscose behavior, η’’ describes the elastic behavior.
For η’ and η’’ accounts:
ωδ
ωγτη 'cos''0
0 G=⋅
⋅= [Pa∙s] (16)
ωδ
ωγτη ''sin'0
0 G=⋅
⋅= [Pa∙s] (17)
It results for the absolute value of complex viscosity:
0
0
0
022
22 ''''''*γτ
ωγτ
ωηηη
=
⋅=
+=+=
GG [Pa∙s]
(18) Accordingly, the absolute value of complex viscosity corresponds to the ratio of stress amplitude and
deformation rate amplitude.
2.3 Measuring technique
2.3.1 Oscillation measurements
Oscillation measurements are used to study the linear-viscoelastic behavior. In the rheometers used,
the sample is located in a gap between an upper plate or cone and a lower plate. This setup is also
called plate-plate or cone-plate geometry. (In the following sections, measuring geometries will be
further explained.) In principle, both geometries are suitable for oscillation measurements.
2.3.1.1 Amplitude sweep (= strain sweep and stress sweep)
During the amplitude test, the frequency is held constant and the amplitude of the deformation signal
or the strain signal is varied, depending on whether the following frequency measurement is
supposed to be conducted by deformation control or by strain control. If the amplitude is not too
high, the rheological material value functions (i.e. G‘(ω) and G‘‘(ω)) do not show any dependence
on the amplitude. This measurement range is called region of linear viscoelasticity. In this range, the
idle state of the sample is not disturbed. Starting from a specific amplitude value, the rheological
material functions G‘(ω) and G‘‘(ω) decrease with increasing amplitude. In this range the laws of
- 8 -
non-linear viscoelasticity are applicable; the idle state of the sample is disturbed. For solutions and
melts of polymers a disentanglement of entangled (verhakt) molecular chains occurs.
2.3.1.2 Frequency sweep
Within the frequency test, the radial frequency ω is varied, whereas the deformation amplitude γ0 is
held constant in case of deformation-controlled oscillation experiments and the strain amplitude τ0 is
held constant for strain-controlled experiments. Concerning an optimum in signal to noise ratio, the
highest possible deformation or strain amplitude is chosen from the rheograms of the previously
performed amplitude tests, which is just in the linear viscoelastic area. Usually, storage modulus
𝐺′(𝜔), loss modulus 𝐺′′(𝜔) and the absolute value of complex viscosity Iη*I are measured and
drawn against radial frequency ω in a double logarithmic reference frame, because the rheological
material value functions change with radial frequency over several orders of magnitude.
2.3.1.3 Time sweep
Time sweep is carried out at constant amplitude γ0 or τ0, respectively and constant angular velocity.
The time-dependent behavior of the rheological material value functions is observed. Thus, changes
in the material properties over time can be recorded by using rheology. One example is the
thickening process in the manufacture of gels or the stability of polymer solutions against gelling.
2.3.1.4 Temperature sweep
A temperature ramp at constant angular frequency and deformation is applied. The temperature
dependent measurement is illustrated by a semi-logarithmic plot of storage and loss modulus as a
function of temperature. With the aid of a temperature sweep, for example, glass transition
temperature and crystallization temperature of polymers can be determined. This technique is often
called dynamic mechanical thermal analysis (DMTA).
2.3.2 Rotational experiments
Rotational experiments offer another possibility to either preset strain or deformation rate. In a
strain-controlled experiment, the resulting deformation rate is received as the answer of the system,
in deformation-controlled experiments, respectively, the resulting strain is obtained. Rotational
experiments are usually conducted with cone/plate geometry, because with this measuring system,
the deformation rate is independent of the distance r to the middle of the plate and thus constant.
- 9 -
Exclusively rotational experiments are performed to record flow curves (plot of 𝜏 against �̇� ) or
viscosity curves (plot of η against �̇�).
- 10 -
2.3.3 Tension experiment
This experiment is a rotational experiment in which the time-dependent behavior of rheological
quantities is recorded. Here, a constant deformation rate is preset and the resulting strain signal is
measured as a function of time. In the ideal case of the experiment, the angular frequency escalates
from the idle state to a constant value. Viscoelastic liquids exhibit a delayed increase in shear stress.
If the measured time-dependent shear stress is correlated to the preset constant deformation rate, the
time-dependent (transient) viscosity η+(t) is obtained:
γτ
η
)()( tt ≡+
[Pa·s] (19)
In the case of viscoelastic fluids the transient viscosity approximates a boundary value with
progressing measurement time. This boundary value is called stationary (= time-independent) shear
viscosity η:
)(),(lim γηγη =+
∞→
tt
[Pa·s] (20)
2.3.4 Relaxation experiment
In the relaxation experiment, the sample is stressed by an escalating deformation γo and the resulting
strain signal τ(t), which decreases with time, is measured. Due to its elastic restoring force a strain is
produced by the preset deformation. A relaxation process within the sample takes place by viscous
flow and the generated strain diminishes. If the strain signal is correlated with the preset
deformation, the nonlinear-viscoelastic relaxation modulus is obtained, with is dependent of time and
the existent deformation:
Relaxation modulus: 0
0)(),(
γτγ ttG ≡ [Pa]
τ(t): strain [Pa] γo: deformation [-]
2.4 Borderline behavior of matter and rheological models
In rheometry material-specific dependencies of the above mentioned interactions of applied shear
stress and resulting shear deformation are obtained. Thereby, the material’s behavior is distinguished
by the following properties: viscous, elastic, viscoelastic and plastic behavior. These behaviors of
material are sketched in Figure 3. All liquids can be described with the aid of viscosity.
- 11 -
Fig. 3: Boundary behavior of matter: (1) elastic (steel), (2) plastic (modelling clay), (3) viscous (water), (4) viscoelastic (silicone rubber).
2.4.1 Elastic behavior
Upon application of strain, which is held constant over a certain period of time, an elastic material
experiences a deformation, which is constant over time, too (Figure 4). In case a strain is applied as a
step function, the resulting deformation shows the same escalating behavior. Solids with this
behavior are defined elastic. If there is an additional directly proportional ratio between applied
strain and the resulting deformation, the solid is called Hookean solids, i.e. Hook’s law is applicable
(see section 2.1, eq. 6). Note that also elastic solids exist, that do not follow Hook’s law, i.e. strain
and deformation are not linearly connected to each other (e. g., materials for which the law of rubber-
elasticity is applicable).
Fig. 4: Definition of elasticity in general: applied strain as a step function and resulting deformation
of escalating behavior.
(1) (2) (3) (4)
t0
t
t t0
γ
t t1
response input
- 12 -
The behavior of a Hookean solid is described by a spring for which Hook’s law is applicable.
Fig. 5: Spring as the mechanical model for elastic behavior.
2.4.2 Plastic behavior
Plastic behavior is characterized by a flow behavior with an existing flow limit. The flow limit is the
strain value under which no or only elastic deformation occurs. Above this limit a permanent
deformation appears. Plastic behavior is illustrated with the Saint Venant body. This mechanical
model consists of a slider, which only moves if the applied force overcomes the resistance of static
friction.
Fig. 6: Shearing of a plastic body as a consequence of strain; for deformation a certain shear stress is
necessary, then, shear stress is constant.
Fig. 7: Saint Venant body as a mechanical model for plastic behavior.
τ
γ
τ0
- 13 -
2.4.3 Viscous behavior
Viscous behavior is found for ideal liquids, the so-called Newtonian liquids. For the definition of the
stationary shear viscosity η the previously described two plate model can be used, for which a
laminar flow is induced in the liquid between two plates as a consequence of the applied shear.
Because of the inner friction of the liquid, the layers only move partially against each other.
Assuming that a laminar flow is present, a velocity gradient is formed in the liquid between the two
plates. As described in section 2.1, for Newtonian liquids, there is a direct proportionality between
shear stress and shear rate, where the constant value is called shear viscosity.
Fig. 8: Applied strain as a step function and resulting deformation for Newtonian liquids. The viscous flow behavior of a Newtonian liquid is described by the mechanical model of an
attenuator. At a constant affecting shear force, force and piston speed are proportional. The piston
immediately stops at the position where it was, when the force effect is finished. Therefore the
deformation of the liquid fully persists even when the force is relieved.
Fig. 9: Attenuator as a mechanical model for viscous flow behavior.
t0
input
τ
tt0 t1t1
γ
tt1
response
- 14 -
2.4.4 Viscoelastic behavior
As described in section 2.2 many materials do not show exclusively viscous or elastic behavior, but a
combination of both properties. Depending on the type of strain that is applied to the material, the
respective components of viscoelastic flow behavior appear more or less pronounced. Rheological
material value functions used for describing viscoelastic flow behavior are given in section 2.2.
Viscoelastic behavior can be described by mechanical models where spring and attenuator are
combined. For describing the behavior of viscoelastic liquids (polymer melts or concentrated
polymer solutions) one or several Maxwell elements are used. A Maxwell element is a series of
connected springs and attenuators. If a force is applied in form of a step function, the result is a
spontaneous deflection (elastic behavior). Then, the effect of the attenuator appears (viscous
behavior). The initial position is not reached again. This model describes the ideal behavior of
viscoelastic liquids.
Fig. 10: Applied strain as a step function and resulting deformation for a simple Maxwell element.
Fig. 11: Maxwell element as a simple mechanical model for viscoelastic liquids.
For many viscoelastic liquids this model does not describe the flow behavior adequately enough.
Only by parallel connection of several Maxwell elements viscoelastic liquids can be described with
satisfactory accuracy. This approach is called generalized Maxwell model.
τ
t t0 t1
γ
t t1 t0
spring
attenuator regression of the spring
input
response
- 15 -
Fig. 12: Generalized Maxwell model for improved description of the behavior of viscoelastic liquids.
For viscoelastic solids, the viscoelastic behavior is described by the Kelvin Voigt model. Within this
model, spring and attenuator are connected in parallel. The deformation occurs as long as the
straining force is acting with constant intensity. Both components can only be deformed at the same
time and to the same degree, because they are connected by a fixed frame. The spring cannot be
deformed in the same spontaneous way as it would if it was a single spring with liberty of action,
because it is retarded by the attenuator. As a result of the strain period, deformation behavior is
observed as a curved, time-dependent e-function in the γ(t)-graph having deformation values rising
to a certain maximum value. Accordingly, the spring tends to move back to its initial state when the
force is released. This energy effects that both components reach their initial positions. However, this
happens after a certain time. Due to the presence of the attenuator, this is a time-delayed process, too.
Fig. 13: Strain input as a step function and resulting deformation for the Kelvin Voigt model.
input
τ
t t0 t1
γ
t t1 t0
response
- 16 -
Fig. 14: Kelvin Voigt model as a simple mechanical model for viscoelastic solids.
2.4.5 Characterization by flow and viscosity curves
In the following graphs flow and viscosity curves are summarized, which are used to characterize the
rheological behavior of fluid media.
Fig. 15: Flow curves for the description of rheological behavior.
- 17 -
Fig. 16: Viscosity curves for the description of rheological behavior. For a shear thinning substance, viscosity is dependent on the extent of shear strain. With increasing
strain, the flow curve exhibits a negative slope, viscosity decreases, respectively. In the consequence
of shearing, a structural change is induced, which results in the decrease of viscosity. For the filled
systems, the arrangement of the particles is in favor of the lowest possible flow resistance. Thereby,
the arrangement significantly relies on the underlying structure of the deformed material.
Fig. 17: Effect of shearing on the structure of shear thinning materials.
2.5 Time-dependent rheological behavior
To study the time-dependency of structure disassembly and assembly, experiments are conducted
during which the deformation rate is preset as a step function and viscosity is measured in
dependence of time. By such measurements it is possible to distinguish between thixotropic
- 18 -
(structure disassembly) and rheopectic (structure amplification) behavior, whereat these notations
may only be used in case of fully reversible and isothermally occurring processes. If the disassembly
of structure is irreversible, the behavior is denoted non-thixotropic. These time-dependent
deformation phenomena are defined as follows:
Thixotropy:
Thixotropy describes the disassembly of a structure at constant shear strain and complete reassembly
of the structure after a certain period of time. This disassembly/reassembly cycle is a completely
reversible process. Well-known examples for materials with thixotropic behavior are, e.g.,
dispersions like paste, creams, ketchup, lacquer, etc.
Non-thixotropic behavior:
If the reassembly of structure is incomplete or not happening even after a long period of recovery,
the shear strain induces a permanent change in the structure. This effect is sometimes called “unreal”
or “incomplete” thixotropy. A very prominent example for this effect is mixing up yoghurt. After
mixing, the yoghurt is flowing much more than before, even after a long relaxation period.
Rheopecty:
Rheopecty means an increase in structural strength during shear strain, i.e. assembly of structure
during constant shearing and complete disassembly after relaxation. This assembly/disassembly
cycle is a completely reversible process.
2.6 Rheometry (measuring technique)
For conducting rheological studies, rotational rheometers of different geometries can be used. Each
measuring geometry is used for a different value of viscosity. The most common geometries are:
Plate-plate-geometry:
A plate-plate meassuring system consists of two even plates. Ususally the upper plate is the rotor and
thus the movable part of the meassuring geometry (“measuring plate”) und the lower plate is fixed on
the rheometer stand. The geometry is determined by the plate’s radius R. A disadvantage of this
geometry is, that even at a constant rotational speed, the deformation speed – viewed over the entire
plate gap – is not constant but depends on the distance r to the middle of the plate. That is, a radius-
dependent shear rate distribution exists. These non-uniform, non-constant shear conditions are seen
as a disadvantage for scientifically working rheologists, especially when performing exclusively
- 19 -
rotational experiments. These experiments should be conducted with cone-plate geometry for the
above mentioned reasons. However, this disadvantage is of low relevance when determining
rheological material value constants of linear viscoelasticity (that is G’, G’’ and Iη*I), for this reason,
the plate-plate geometry is often used for performing oscillation measurements, especially when the
sample is analyzed at different temperatures or, if the sample is filled with particles (e. g., filled
polymer melts or dispersions with relatively large particles). Plate-plate geometry allows for larger
gap positions, thus, phenomena which negatively affect the measured values, like thermal expansion
of the measuring tools or friction effects due to incorporated particles in filled systems could be
minimized.
Cone-plate geometry:
A cone-plate measuring system consists of a round measurement body with a slightly tilted, slightly
cone-shaped surface and a plate. Usually, the cone is the rotor and hence, the upper, moveable part of
the measuring geometry and the lower plate is unmovably fixed on the rheometer stand. The
dimensions of the conical surface are determined by the cone’s radius R and the cone angle α. A
major advantage of the cone-plate geometry is that with this measurement system, the deformation
rate is independent of the distance r to the middle of the plate. Because of this relationship, cone-
plate geometry is especially recommended for performing rotational experiments.
Coaxial cylinder geometry:
Coaxial cylinder measuring systems consist of a measurement body (inner cylinder) and a measuring
cup (outer cylinder). Coaxial means that both cylindrical components are located along one identical
rotationally symmetric axis when the system is in working position. These measuring systems are
especially used for studying low viscous liquids. According to the operating mode, two system types
are distinguished. In the Couette system, the outer cylinder is rotating whereas in the Searle system,
it is the inner cylinder.
3 Experimental
All experiments are conducted with a cone-system (Ø=50 mm, cone-plate-geometry). Temperature
control of the plate is conducted by a Peltier element. Unless stated otherwise, all experiments are
carried out at a temperature of T = 25 °C.
3.1 Conduction of rotational measurements
- 20 -
The following samples should be classified according to their characteristic flow behavior. The
respective flow phenomena and the underlying structure are to be discussed based on the measured
flow and viscosity curves.
Sample 1: Honey
Shear rate: �̇� = 10-1 to 103 1𝑠
Sample 2: 14 wt.-% PVP-solution (H2O) (Mw = 1,300,000 g/mol)
Temperature: T = 20°C
Shear rate: �̇� = 100 to 103 1𝑠
Sample 3: starch/H2O suspension (50 wt.-%)
Shear rate: �̇� = 10-1 to 102 1𝑠
3.2 Time-dependent change of viscosity
Time-dependent measurements at predetermined deformation rates are performed and the
characteristic evolution of the viscosity function depending on time is discussed. The observed effect
is to be discussed with regard to the underlying effects.
Sample 4: Ketchup Measuring program: From t = 0 to 3 s: γ = 0.1 1
𝑠
From t = 3 to 6 s: γ = 100 1𝑠
From t = 6 to 250 s: γ = 0.1 1𝑠
3.3 Oscillation measurements to determine the viscoelastic behavior
Two oscillation experiments are preformed and the measured curves are discussed. The highest
possible deformation amplitude is chosen from the viscoelastic region and used as a constant
parameter (default value) for the following frequency test.
3.3.1 Oscillation measurement by varying the deformation amplitude at a constant angular
frequency (amplitude test)
Sample 5: 20 wt.-% PVP-solution (H2O) (Mw = 360,000 g/mol)
- 21 -
Temperature: T = 20°C
Measuring program: angular frequency: ω = 10 rad/s
Deformation amplitude from 𝛾𝑜 = 1 % to 1000 %
Illustration of G’, G’’ and |𝜂∗| as a function of the deformation amplitude 𝛾𝑜 and choice of the
deformation amplitude from the measured curves for the subsequent oscillation measurement (from
linear viscoelastic to non-linear viscoelastic behavior).
3.3.2 Oscillation measurement by varying the angular frequency
Temperature: T = 20°C
Measuring program: Use of the deformation amplitude determined in 3.3.1 as a default
Angular frequency from ω = 100 to 0.1 rad/s
Illustration of G’, G’’ and |𝜂∗| as a function of angular frequency. Explain the rheological behavior
based on the depicted curves (viscosity, viscoelasticity and elasticity). Describe the structural events
at the transition between the borderline cases.
4 Questions
1. Term other applied examples for the determination of materials’ viscosity.
2. Sketch the most important flow and viscosity diagrams.
3. Describe the advantages and disadvantages of plate/plate and cone/plate geometry.
5 Literature
1. M. Dragoni, A. Tallarico, J. Volcanol. Geoth. Res. (1994), 59, 241
2. G. Miyamoto, S. Sasaki, Computers & Geosciences (1996), 23, 283
3. G. B. Thurston, Biophys. J. (1972), 12, 1205
4. W.P. Cox, E.H. Merz: J. Polym. Sci. (1958), 28, 619
5. G. Böhme, M. Stenger: Chem. Eng. Technol. (1988), 11, 199
6. G. V. Vinogradov, A. Y. Malkin, Y. G. Yanovsky, E. A. Dzyura V. F. Schumsky, V. G.
Kulichikhin: Rheol. Acta 8 (1969), 490-496
7. G. V. Vinogradov, N. V. Prozorovskaya: Rheol. Acta 3 (1964)
8. G. V. Vinogradov, A. Y. Malkin: J. Polym. Sci. A: Polym. Chem. (1964), 2, 2357
9. H. M. Laun: Progr. Coll. Pol. Sci. (1987), 75, 111
- 22 -
10. H. M. Laun: Rheol. Acta (1978), 17, 1
11. J. D. Ferry: Viscoelastic properties of polymers, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (1970)
12. L. E. Nielsen: Polymer Rheology, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York – Basel (1977)