polyaromatic hydrocarbons essay
TRANSCRIPT
5/16/2018 Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons Essay - slidepdf.com
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/polyaromatic-hydrocarbons-essay 1/25
Page 1 of 25
POLYAROMATIC HYDROCARBONS (PAHs) ARE PRIORITY HAZARDOUS
SUBSTANCES PRESENT IN WASTEWATER AND WATER. DISCUSS THEIR
SOURCES, DISTRIBUTION AND REMOVAL FOR EACH OF THESE TREATMENT
PROCESSES.
BY
SABINA YETUNDE IBINITIE GBADEGESIN
4154823
MODULE: WATER TREATMENT ENGINEERING (J14WTE)
WORD COUNT: 3876
12th DECEMBER, 2011
5/16/2018 Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons Essay - slidepdf.com
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/polyaromatic-hydrocarbons-essay 2/25
Page 2 of 25
CONTENT
LIST OF TABLES 3
LIST OF FIGURES 3
ABSTRACT 4
INTRODUCTION 5
Sources and distribution of PAHs 5
CHARACTERISATION OF THE PROBLEM 7
TREATMENT OPTIONS 8
Determination of PAHs in wastewater 8
Determination of PAHs in drinking water 9
Removal of PAHs from water and wastewater 10
Removal by adsorption 11
Removal by volatilisation 12
Removal by photolysis 13
Removal by microbial-/bio- degradation/remediation 15
CURRENT STATUS 19
Use of a Conventional Activated Sludge Process (CASP) in a WWTP 19
with a Membrane Bioreactor (MBR)
Use of activated carbon or oxidation processes in drinking water treatment 20
CONCLUSION 21
Recommendation 21
BIBLIOGRAPHY 22
5/16/2018 Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons Essay - slidepdf.com
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/polyaromatic-hydrocarbons-essay 3/25
Page 3 of 25
LIST OF TABLES
Formula and Molecular Weight of the 16 PAHs in U.S.EPA priority pollutants List 6
Standards and Regulations for Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Water 7
Table showing the US EPA method detection limits for the determination of PAHs 9
in drinking water and waste water
Table showing some adsorbents and their characteristics for PAHs removal in water 12
LIST OF FIGURES
The chemical structures of the 16 PAHs listed in the U.S.EPA lists of priority 6
pollutants
Chromatographic determination of the 16 US EPA priority PAHs using HPLC 10
Flow chart of a Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) at Fusina, Venice, Italy 11
A Photo-chemical Reactor 13
Scheme of PAHs photo-degradation pathways in the O2 /H2O system 14
Photolysis products of benzo(a)pyrene 15
Figure showing the proposed pathway for the microbial catabolism of PAHs 16
A block diagram showing a wastewater treatment plant that uses 17
biodegradation technology
A schematic of the in situ bioremediation of PAH-contaminated groundwater 18
A pilot scale MBR in parallel with a WWTP 19
5/16/2018 Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons Essay - slidepdf.com
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/polyaromatic-hydrocarbons-essay 4/25
Page 4 of 25
ABSTRACT
This paper discusses the prevalence of PAHs – a priority hazardous pollutant in the
aquatic environment with special reference to wastewater and water. The various
treatment processes such as adsorption, bioremediation, photo-chemical oxidation and
volatilisation were looked into. All the treatment options were seen capable of removing
certain PAHs to an extent from water and wastewater. The PAHs considered in this paper
are the 16 PAHs listed in the US EPA list of priority pollutants; they are naphthalene,
acenaphthylene, acenaphthene, flourene, phenanthrene, anthracene, fluoranthene,
pyrene, Benzo(a)anthracene, chrysene, Benzo(b)fluoranthene, Benzo(k)fluoranthene,
Benzo(a)pyrene, indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene, Benzo(g,h,i)perylene and
dibenzo(a,h)anthracene. Adsorption process was seen capable of removing all of the 16
PAHs with a removal efficiency of over 95% when the adsorbent used is activated
carbon. Bioremediation was also capable of removing some of the PAHs (2-3 rings) with
an efficiency of about 94%; but had difficulty in removing the high molecular weight
PAHs (4 rings and above). Volatilisation was seen to contribute little or nothing to PAHs
removal from water as it had a removal efficiency of 1-2%; and only the low molecular
weight PAHs were able to volatilise easily from the water body. Photolysis was seen to
degrade the PAHs at a very fast rate with initial PAHs removal of 50% within 20seconds.
5/16/2018 Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons Essay - slidepdf.com
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/polyaromatic-hydrocarbons-essay 5/25
Page 5 of 25
INTRODUCTION
Polycyclic (polynuclear) aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) belong to a class of complex
organic compounds whose molecules usually consist of at least two aromatic rings fused
together which are arranged in different configurations (Kanaly and Harayama, 2000).They are formed during the pyrolysis or incomplete combustion of organic substances,
either naturally or anthropogenically (Ravindra et al., 2008; Popp et al., 2000). They are
referred to as priority hazardous substances because some of them have proven to be
carcinogenic, mutagenic, recalcitrant and ubiquitous in nature (Crisafully et al., 2008;
Cao et al., 2005). PAHs are listed in the European Union and in the United States
Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) priority list of pollutants. About a hundred
PAHs have been identified but only 16 of them have been included in the US EPA list of
priority pollutants (Cao et al., 2005), due to more information being known about them
concerning their probable carcinogenic effects on humans and mutagenic effects on
aquatic life; and their high level of concentration in the environment compared to the
other PAHs. The sixteen PAHs (Wang et al., 2006; Lataweic and Reid, 2010) are listed in
table 1 with their corresponding molecular weight; while their corresponding chemical
structures are shown in figure 1 (Dionex Corporation, 2009).
SOURCES AND DISTRIBUTION OF PAHs
Sources of PAHs can be categorised either as natural or anthropogenic sources. PAHs are
ubiquitous; they can be found in air, soil, sediments and water. Some of the natural
sources of PAHs include emissions from volcanic eruptions, burning vegetation and forest
fires; while anthropogenic sources include emissions from the incomplete combustion of
fossil fuels (i.e. coal, petroleum & natural gas), waste incinerators, industrial plants, car
exhaust, seepage of some petroleum products (from vehicle maintenance and fuel
stations) and tyre degradation. However, most of the sources of PAHs in our
environment are anthropogenic due to the level of human activities that take place which
outweigh the natural sources (Cao et al., 2005; Popp et al., 2000).
Some of the sources of PAHs in wastewater and water include produced water that is
obtained during the production of crude oil, storm run-off with PAHs from car exhausts,
and wastewater produced from petrochemical plants (Crissafully et al., 2008).
These PAHs-containing wastes become distributed by entering ground waters and
surface waters through seepage or percolation processes (Sponza and Oztekin, 2010).
5/16/2018 Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons Essay - slidepdf.com
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/polyaromatic-hydrocarbons-essay 6/25
Page 6 of 25
Table 1: Formula and Molecular Weight of the 16 PAHs in U.S.EPA priority pollutants List
S/N
PAHd Formulae MolecularWeight(gmol-1)
Reference
1 NaphthaleneAcenaphthyleneAcenaphthene
FlourenePhenanthreneAnthraceneFlouranthene
PyreneBenzo(a)anthraceneChrysene
Benzo(b)flourantheneBenzo(k)flouranthene
Benzo(a)pyreneIndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyreneBenzo(g,h,i)peryleneDibenzo(a,h)anthracene
C10H8 128 c2 C12H8 152 c
3 C12H10 154 c
4 C10H10 166 b, c
5 C14H10 178 c
6 C14H10 178 c
7 C16H10 202 a, c
8 C16H10 202 a, c
9 C18H12 228 a, c
10 C18H12 228 a, c
11 C20H12 252 a, c
12 C20H12 252 a, c
13 C20H12 252 a, c14 C22H12 276 c
15 C22H12 276 c
16 C22H14 278 a, c
a (Perez-Gregorio et al., 2010); b (Shemer and Linden, 2007) ; c (Sponza andOztekin, 2010); d (Wang et al ., 2006); e (Ferrarese et al ., 2008)
Figure 1: The chemical structures of the 16 PAHs listed in the U.S.EPA lists of priority
pollutants (Dionex Corporation, 2009).
5/16/2018 Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons Essay - slidepdf.com
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/polyaromatic-hydrocarbons-essay 7/25
Page 7 of 25
CHARACTERISATION OF THE PROBLEM
PAHs are released into water through atmospheric deposition, industrial wastewater
effluents and petroleum spills. Generally, PAHs are hydrophobic; they have a low
solubility in water which decreases with their increasing molecular weight. Thishydrophobic property makes their affinity for suspended particles in water high. It
becomes deposited on suspended solids, sediments, aquatic organisms and sea beds;
and their concentration level in oils is estimated to be much higher (Anyakora and Coker,
2006). This accumulation potential of PAHs in water bodies has brought about great
environmental concerns as a result of the carcinogenic and recalcitrant nature of the
PAHs (Haritash and Kaushik, 2009). There is no recommended safe level of PAHs
concentration in water; this is due to its carcinogenic nature which is highly toxic to both
humans and aquatic life (US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health
Service, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, 1995). Benzo(a)pyrene is
the PAH that has been thoroughly studied the most; and the European Union gave its
limit alone in drinking water to be 10ng/L. The guideline value (GV) in drinking water
quality for Benzo(a)pyrene has been estimated to be 0.7mg/L and this corresponds to an
excess lifetime cancer risk of 10-5 (WHO, 1998). The Maximum Contaminant Level of
some PAHs in water according to the US EPA is given in table 2 below.
Table 2: Standards and Regulations for Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Water
Agency Maximum
ContaminantLevel (MCL)(mg/L)
PAHs
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
0.0001
0.0002
0.0003
0.0004
MCL forBenz(a)anthracene
MCL forBenzo(a)pyrene,Benzo(b)fluoranthene,Benzo(k)fluoranthene,Chrysene
MCL for
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
MCL for Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Source: (Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR), 2009)
5/16/2018 Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons Essay - slidepdf.com
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/polyaromatic-hydrocarbons-essay 8/25
Page 8 of 25
TREATMENT OPTIONS
The removal of PAHs from wastewater and water is twofold. The PAHs have to be
detected in the samples first before they are removed. Several methods have been
employed in the removal of PAHs from wastewater and water such as microbial/bio
degradation, adsorption, chemical degradation or photolysis, volatilization; all these
treatment options may be categorized under biological, physical or chemical removal
processes (Haritash and Kaushik, 2009). Before PAHs removal from water can be
considered, its presence and concentration has to be determined first so that an
appropriate removal technology may be used for the water treatment.
DETERMINATION OF PAHs IN WASTEWATER
The method used in the determination of PAHs in municipal and industrial wastewater is
the US EPA method 610. This method detects the 16 PAHs mentioned in the US EPA
priority pollutants list. The procedure can be described thus; a one liter volume of the
sample of wastewater is measured and extracted with methylene chloride by using the
Continuous Liquid-Liquid Extraction (CLLE) process (Brown et al., 1999; US EPA, 1996).
The extract, i.e. the wastewater sample together with the methylene chloride is then
dried and separated. Two methods can be used to carry out this separation;
1. High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) separation with dual
wavelength Ultraviolet (UV) detector or Fluorescence Detector (FLD) for the PAHs
identification and measurement.
2. Gas Chromatography (GC) separation with Flame Ionization Detector (FID) for
identifying and measuring the PAHs.
Once the PAHs have been identified and measured by the procedure above, the results
have to be confirmed by an additional appropriate qualitative technique. The US EPA
method 625 efficiently provides conditions necessary for confirmation of the results by
making use of a Gas Chromatograph/Mass Spectrometer (GC/MS) on the extract.
An illustration of the representation of the method using HPLC is as shown in figure two;in this case, the conventional US EPA method 610 was not entirely applied in the
determination process. HPLC analysis of the actual wastewater sample was carried out
using a photodiode array detector (PAD) for the PAHs identification and measurement.
The calibration curves were obtained by preparing standards with known concentration
so that each of the PAH compounds were quantified in actual wastewater samples and
simulated wastewater samples (Tikilili and Nkhalambayausi-Chirwa, 2011).
5/16/2018 Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons Essay - slidepdf.com
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/polyaromatic-hydrocarbons-essay 9/25
Page 9 of 25
DETERMINATION OF PAHs IN DRINKING WATER
The method used for the determination of PAHs in drinking water is the US EPA method
550.1. It also detects the 16 PAHs in the US EPA list of priority pollutants. The method is
quite similar to that used for PAHs determination in wastewater; In this case, the PAHs
are extracted when 1Liter of the drinking water sample is passed through a cartridge
which contains a solid inorganic matrix that is chemically coated with an organic phase.
This is known as Liquid-Solid Extraction (LSE). Methylene chloride is added to the extract
and this is dried and concentrated to a volume of 0.5ml by adding 3ml of acetonitrile to
it. HPLC separates the extract and UV & FLD are used to identify and measure the PAHs
(US EPA, 1990).
The US EPA specifies the Method Detection Limits (MDL)for the determination of PAHs in
wastewater and water and they are as shown in the table 3 below.
Table 3: Table showing the US EPA method detection limits for the determination of
PAHs in drinking water and waste water
S/N PAH MDL inDrinking
Water(µg/L)a
MDL inWastewater
(µg/L)b
1 NaphthaleneAcenaphthyleneAcenaphthene
FlourenePhenanthreneAnthraceneFlouranthenePyrene
Benzo(a)anthraceneChryseneBenzo(b)flourantheneBenzo(k)flourantheneBenzo(a)pyreneIndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyreneBenzo(g,h,i)peryleneDibenzo(a,h)anthracene
2.20 1.8
2 1.41 2.3
3 2.04 1.8
4 0.126 0.215 0.150 0.64
6 0.140 0.66
7 0.009 0.21
8 0.126 0.27
9 0.004 0.013
10 0.160 0.15
11 0.006 0.018
12 0.003 0.017
13 0.016 0.023
14 0.036 0.043
15 0.020 0.076
16 0.035 0.030aUS EPA Method 550.1: Determination of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in
Drinking Water by Liquid-Solid Extraction and HPLC with Coupled Ultraviolet and
Fluorescence Detection, 1990bUS EPA Methods for Organic Chemical Analysis of Municipal and Industrial
Wastewater: Method 610 – Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons, 1996
5/16/2018 Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons Essay - slidepdf.com
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/polyaromatic-hydrocarbons-essay 10/25
Page 10 of 25
Figure 2: Chromatographic determination of the 16 US EPA priority PAHs using HPLC
(Tikilili and Nkhalambayausi-Chirwa, 2011).
REMOVAL OF PAHs FROM WATER AND WASTEWATER
The figure three on the next page shows a flowchart for a wastewater treatment plant in
Venice, Italy in which aqueous and sludge samples were collected from it for PAHs
determination and removal. The US EPA 610 method as described above was used and a
Solid Phase Extraction (SPE) procedure was applied so that all of the 16 PAHs were
recovered simultaneously with yields greater than 70% (Busetti et al., 2006).
5/16/2018 Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons Essay - slidepdf.com
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/polyaromatic-hydrocarbons-essay 11/25
Page 11 of 25
Figure 3: Flow chart of a Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) at Fusina, Venice, Italy
(Busetti et al ., 2006).
REMOVAL BY ADSORPTION
In water and waste water treatment, adsorption may be defined as the process in which
pollutants or contaminants leave solution and stick on the surface of a solid by means of
physical or chemical bonding (Metcalf and Eddy, 1979). The pollutant molecules are
referred to as the adsorbate while the solid which attracts these pollutants are referred
to as the adsorbent. Adsorption has been seen to effectively remove organic pollutants,
especially PAHs from water and waste water (Yuan et al., 2010). Table four lists some
example adsorbents that have been used to remove PAHs from aquatic environments. In
wastewater treatment plants (WWTP), the physical adsorption process is used. In water
treatment processes, PAHs removal by adsorption has been carried out in coagulation,
flocculation, sedimentation, filtration and Activated Sludge Process (ASP) with activated
carbon or sand. The sludge in the ASP is referred to as an organic adsorbent. Table fourshows some adsorbents that have been used to remove certain PAHs in certain studies;
from the table, it can be seen that activated carbon has the highest efficiency for
removing PAHs. Although, the certain PAH studied was naphthalene, but in practice, it
has been seen to remove all of the 16 PAHs listed in the US EPA list of priority pollutants
at above 95% efficiency. Other adsorbents, such as porous carbon, leonardite and wood
fibre; which are generally referred to as low cost adsorbents, also have the ability to
remove certain PAHs from water but are not as efficient as activated carbon. Also, they
have not been tested on a large scale (Zeledon-Toruno et al., 2007).
5/16/2018 Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons Essay - slidepdf.com
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/polyaromatic-hydrocarbons-essay 12/25
Page 12 of 25
Table 4: Table showing some adsorbents and their characteristics for PAHs removal in
water
Type of Adsorbent Advantages & Disadvantages
PAHsRemoved
(Studied)
RemovalEfficiency &
Scale-up
Environ-mental
conside-rations
Activated Carbon(from carbonaceous
sources)(a)
Advantage:It has a highadsorptioncoefficient due to
the intra – particle diffusionwithin its pores.Disadvantage:It is expensive toproduce.
Naphthalene
NaphthaleneFluorenePyrene
FluoranthenePhenanthrene
Over 95% of the PAH wasremoved.It can be
used in largescale but itscost is alimitingfactor.
Probability of CO2 emissionduring itsproduction
which is aGHG (b).
Derived PorousCarbon fromPetroleum Coke(A bye-product of
bitumenUpgrading
process)(a)
Advantage:Cheap sourceand low cost of
production.Disadvantage:Slow process; It
takes long hoursto reachadsorptionequilibrium.
Over 90% of the PAHswere
removed.It can bescaled up.
Thepetroleumcoke source
containsabout 8%Sulphur which
is undesirablein theenvironment.
Leonardite(Immature Coal)(c)
Advantage:
Low cost andavailability.Disadvantage:Low Flourene
removalefficiency.
Flourene
PyreneBenzo(k)-flourantheneBenzo(a)-
pyreneBenzo(g,h,i)-perylene
Over 82% of
the PAHswereremoved.Scale up is
still underconsiderationbut has beensuccessful ina series of batch
experiments.
Leonardite is
regarded as apromisingcandidate forpollution
remediationin both soiland groundwater.
(a)(Yuan et al ., 2010); (b) GHG – Green House Gas which causes global warming;(c)(Zeledon-Toruno et al., 2007)
REMOVAL BY VOLATILIZATION
Volatilization in this context can be defined as the movement of PAHs from water to the
atmosphere. It is useful in removing PAHs with two to three rings from aquatic
environment, e.g. naphthalene and anthracene. This is due to the relative volatility of
the PAHs in water and their low molecular weight compared to the other PAHs. The rate
of volatilization of PAHs from water bodies is dependent on its distribution coefficient and
5/16/2018 Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons Essay - slidepdf.com
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/polyaromatic-hydrocarbons-essay 13/25
Page 13 of 25
environmental factors such as temperature, water turbulence and wind. Although, this
process employs little or no procedure, it is not efficient. It contributes to only 1-2% of
the PAHs removal and there is a probability of the volatilized PAHs returning to the water
via atmospheric deposition. Volatilization does not and is not being expected to play a
significant role in the reduction of carcinogenic PAHs in aquatic environments
(Southworth, 1979).
REMOVAL BY PHOTOLYSIS
Photolysis of PAHs in water involves photo-chemical transformations whereby the PAHs
are decomposed through photo-chemical oxidation processes. It is the most commonly
employed mechanism for the removal of PAHs from water (Zeledon-Toruno et al., 2007).
The photo-oxidation of these PAHs in water goes through a complex mechanism which
usually involves oxygen (i.e. singlet oxygen, ozone) or HO-radical ((Nagpal 1993);
(Miller and Olejnik, 2001)). Singlet oxygen photo-oxidation happens to be the most
dominant process for PAHs degradation in water.
Figure 4: A Photo-chemical Reactor (Miller and Olejnik, 2001).
Where (1) Sampling port; (2) UV Lamp; (3) Gas Inlet; (4) Quartz well; (5) Thermostatic
bath; (6) Magnetic stirrer.
5/16/2018 Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons Essay - slidepdf.com
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/polyaromatic-hydrocarbons-essay 14/25
Page 14 of 25
Figure four shows a photo-chemical reactor which was used for the experimental study
of the photolysis of certain three PAHs; they are benzo(a)pyrene, chrysene and fluorene.
The reactor was a glass type of 1dm3 volume. It was glass to allow for the emission and
absorption of UV light. The influence of the initial PAHs concentration was such that the
higher it was, more UV light was absorbed by the PAHs which in turn increased the
reaction rates for the photo-chemical reactions that occurred. The quartz well was to
allow for the insertion of a low and medium pressure UV lamp; the thermostatic bath
was to maintain a constant temperature throughout the procedure. The magnetic stirrer
brought about agitation of the reaction mixture. The complex mechanism by which these
reactions occur is as shown in figure four below.
Figure 5: Scheme of PAHs photo-degradation pathways in the O2 /H2O system (Miller and
Olejnik, 2001).
Figure five above shows the series of possible reactions that may occur to PAHs in water
with oxygen and UV radiation. In this complex mechanism, intermediates of the photo-
degradation may compete for oxygen, UV light or sometimes react with each other;
thus, there is no simple kinetic model available for the depiction of the PAHs degradation
by photolysis in water. Basically, there are three different mechanisms by which PAHs
may decompose; ozonolysis (reaction with ozone, O3), ultra-violet radiation (hv ) or
5/16/2018 Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons Essay - slidepdf.com
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/polyaromatic-hydrocarbons-essay 15/25
Page 15 of 25
reaction with a hydroxyl radical (●OH) (Ledakowicz et al., 2001). The PAHs with three
condensed rings decompose via reactions with a radical cation; examples of such PAHs
are fluorene, anthracene, naphthalene, acenaphthene and phenanthrene. The PAHs with
four rings decompose via radical reactions with oxygen taking part in the reaction in the
initial period; examples of such PAHs are Benzo(a)anthracene, Benzo(a)pyrene and
chrysene (Miller and Olejnik, 2001). The products obtained from the photolysis of
Benzo(a)pyrene is shown in figure six below.
Figure 6: Photolysis products of Benzo(a)pyrene (Nagpal, 1993).
Due to the complexity of this method, it has not been tried out on a large scale in water
or wastewater treatment plants. It has only been performed on a laboratory scale with
batch experiments for removal of selected PAHs from water. In a study carried out by
(Miller and Olejnik, 2001) on the photolysis of Benzo(a)pyrene, chrysene and flourene in
water, it was observed that 50% of the initial concentration of Benzo(a)pyrene was
removed in 20 seconds. The degradation of Benzo(a)pyrene proved to be the most
effective out of the three PAHs. 50% of the initial concentration of chrysene decomposed
within a minute while that of flourene spent up to 7 minutes before 50% decomposition
was achieved.
REMOVAL BY MICROBIAL-/BIO- DEGRADATION/REMEDIATION
With reference to PAHs removal from water, biodegradation/bioremediation may be
defined as the process by which PAHs are broken down into less complex metabolites via
biotransformation and into inorganic minerals, H2O, CH4 (anaerobic) or CO2 (aerobic) via
mineralization. Microbial degradation is the major degradation process which PAHs
5/16/2018 Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons Essay - slidepdf.com
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/polyaromatic-hydrocarbons-essay 16/25
Page 16 of 25
undergo and it may also be referred to as bioremediation; this process transforms the
PAHs into less hazardous forms with little or no chemical input. It also involves less time
& energy and it is less expensive when compared to the other methods already
discussed. Also, the PAHs are less likely to be transferred from one phase to the other
during this process compared to the other treatment/removal processes (Haritash and
Kaushik, 2009).
The rate at which the degradation of the PAHs occur depends upon the environmental
conditions (temperature, oxygen), the chemical structure of the PAHs and the type &
population of the micro-organisms taking part in the degradation process. The main
micro-organisms which take part in the degradation of PAHs include bacteria, fungi and
algae. Enzymes are also involved in the degradation of PAHs in water (Haritash and
Kaushik, 2009).
Figure 7: Figure showing the proposed pathway for the microbial catabolism of PAHs
(Haritash and Kaushik, 2009).
The PAHs biodegradation mechanisms by algae, fungi, bacteria and enzymes are as
depicted in the figure seven above. From the schematic, it can be observed that the
degradation may occur using a combination of algae, fungi and bacteria. The
degradation can also occur using any of the micro-organisms individually. Making use of
5/16/2018 Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons Essay - slidepdf.com
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/polyaromatic-hydrocarbons-essay 17/25
Page 17 of 25
the micro-organisms in combination is a more efficient process for the PAHs removal
when compared to using them individually (Haritash and Kaushik, 2009).
The biotransformation of the PAHs into less complex metabolites is as shown in figure
seven. The mechanism uses a combination of fungi, bacteria, O2 and Cyt-P450 Mono-
oxygenase (an enzyme) to degrade the PAH into an arene-oxide which may be further
decomposed by enzymatic action using epoxide-hydrolase to a trans-diol or the arene-
oxide further degrades by non-enzymatic action to a phenol which decomposes to give
less hazardous metabolites such as glucoside, xyloside etc. The mineralization of the
PAHs may also go through different routes as shown in figure seven. The first uses a
combination of fungi (white rot), enzymes (Laccase, Lignin/Mn peroxidase) and H2O2 to
degrade the PAHs into PAH-Quinones which further goes through ring fission to produce
CO2. The second may be described as an aerobic mechanism; it makes use of bacteria
and enzyme (dioxygenase) in the presence of oxygen to produce CO2 while in the third
scenario, the PAHs undergo mineralization via anaerobic mechanism.
The addition of Membrane Bio-Reactors (MBR) to municipal wastewater systems has
been seen to increase the removal of PAHs with efficiency of 40% to 60% (Fatone et al.,
2011). The application of biodegradation technology for the removal of PAHs from water
can be seen in figure eight below where a membrane bio-reactor (which is the anaerobic
digester) has been included in the water treatment plant.
Figure 8: A block diagram showing a wastewater treatment plant that uses
biodegradation technology (Fatone et al., 2011).
5/16/2018 Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons Essay - slidepdf.com
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/polyaromatic-hydrocarbons-essay 18/25
Page 18 of 25
The application of bioremediation technology to the removal of PAHs in ground water can
be seen in figure nine below. Here, the biodegradation is carried out in-situ (i.e. within
the water aquifer) and the abstraction and injection wells are used to circulate the
oxygen source, inoculum and the nutrients round the aquifer; and it was seen to reduce
the PAHs concentration in groundwater from 11µgL-1 to 0.7 µgL-1 which is approximately
94% removal efficiency (Bamforth and Singleton, 2005).
Figure 9: A schematic of the in situ bioremediation of PAH-contaminated groundwater
(Bamforth and Singleton, 2005).
Bioremediation has been seen to be the most significant process of all the removal
technologies for PAHs from water (Gok and Sponza, 2010) but it is not advisable to carry
out biodegradation on PAH-contaminated water when the significant amount of PAHs
present in the water are those containing more than four rings; this is because there is
little or no removal of these PAHs as a result of their high molecular weight and the time
taken for a reasonable reduction of these PAHs is so long that it is not economically
viable (Bamforth and Singleton, 2005). Hence, this procedure is expensive for the
removal of high molecular weight PAHs.
5/16/2018 Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons Essay - slidepdf.com
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/polyaromatic-hydrocarbons-essay 19/25
Page 19 of 25
CURRENT STATUS
USE OF A CONVENTIONAL ACTIVATED SLUDGE PROCESS (CASP) IN A WWTP WITH A
MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR (MBR).
At the moment, there are a lot of speculations as to which is the best removal
technology to employ; but it seems the ones gaining prevalence are the adsorption and
biological methods. This may be due to the high PAHs (for high and low molecular
weight) removal efficiency of the physical adsorption method. At the moment,
volatilisation is the least employed of all the methods due to the very low efficiency of
the process.
Currently, the conventional activated sludge process is used in parallel with a membrane
bioreactor which employs the method of biodegradation as shown in figure ten below.
Figure 10: A pilot scale MBR in parallel with a WWTP (Fatone et al., 2011).
The MBR technology involves biosorption (i.e. adsorption onto micro-organisms) and
biodegradation/bioremediation. This method aims to strike a balance between cost and
removal efficiency by taking advantage of the low cost of the biodegradation process and
the ability to remove both low and high molecular weight PAHs by the adsorption
process. The use of the MBR has been seen to enhance the bioremediation process of
PAHs in water. Using this technology, the 16 PAHs listed in the US EPA priority list of
pollutants were seen to be removed at an efficiency of about 60% with the WWTP in
question not even having primary sedimentation. The use of membrane bioreactors
technology is rapidly growing in water treatment plants and one of such plants is already
operating at full scale in Italy while the rest are still at the pilot stage (Fatone et al.,
2011). The outcome of PAHs in activated sludge systems have been studied and it was
5/16/2018 Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons Essay - slidepdf.com
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/polyaromatic-hydrocarbons-essay 20/25
Page 20 of 25
seen that under aerobic conditions, the PAHs were biodegraded with a 67% efficiency;
the low molecular weight PAHs (2-3 rings) were seen to biodegrade faster than the high
molecular weight PAHs (4-6 rings) (Fatone et al., 2011).
USE OF ACTIVATED CARBON OR OXIDATION PROCESSES IN DRINKING WATER
TREATMENT.
Recently, studies have shown that the conventional water treatment methods are not
able to efficiently remove PAHs from drinking water. Current methods are the use of
activated carbon for adsorption of the PAHs or advanced oxidation (photo-chemical
oxidation) processes before the chlorination stage. In a recent procedure carried out in
Hangzhou, China, the advanced oxidation technique was carried out on a drinking water
treatment plants and the following PAHs; flourene, benzo(a)pyrene, indeno(1,2,3-
c,d)pyrene, benzo(b)fluoranthene, benzo(k)fluoranthene and benzo(g,h,i)perylene were
successfully removed at an efficiency of 43.5% (Chen and Zhu, 2011).
The removal of 5-6 ring PAHs was also looked into in this study and it was observed that
the coagulation dosing technological process was able to remove the PAHs at a high
efficiency with the highest PAH removal efficiency being 78.3% for indeno(1,2,3-
c,d)pyrene (Chen and Zhu, 2011).
5/16/2018 Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons Essay - slidepdf.com
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/polyaromatic-hydrocarbons-essay 21/25
Page 21 of 25
CONCLUSION
The analysis procedures for the determination of PAHs and the different removal options
from water and wastewater have been looked into. All methods available have been seen
to be able to remove certain PAHs at certain removal efficiencies from both water and
wastewater. Of all the available technologies being employed for the removal of PAHs
from water, The adsorption has been seen to efficiently remove low as well as high
molecular weight PAHs especially when activated carbon is the adsorbent used; it has
also been seen to be employed in activated sludge process in wastewater treatment
plants as well as coagulation, flocculation, sedimentation and filtration in water and
wastewater treatment processes. Bioremediation also gives a high efficient PAHs
removal but finds it difficult to biodegrade PAHs with 4 rings (high molecular weight) and
above; and it is mainly employed in wastewater treatment processes. Not much interest
has been shown in the volatilization process; this is mainly due to the fact that it does
not contribute to the removal of PAHs from water, it has a PAHs removal efficiency of 1-
2%. The photo-chemical degradation/oxidation process involves a very complex
mechanism whose kinetic model is yet to be fully understood; it is mainly employed in
drinking water treatment processes and due to its complexity, is yet to be tried out on a
large scale. The adsorption and bioremediation processes are already well established
with some of their procedures already being employed in water treatment plants.
Current methods employed involve the combined usage of adsorption and
bioremediation to maximize PAHs removal at a lower cost; this is also a good innovation
as studies have shown that PAHs may already be developing some resistance to
bioremediation.
RECOMMENDATION
The adsorption process should be looked into critically and a means should be devised of
optimizing low cost adsorbents as a way of reducing the cost implications which may
arise as a result of using activated carbon. Photolysis presents a promising viable
technology on a large scale if its mechanism can be properly understood as itsdegradation process is very fast; removing about 50% of the initial PAHs concentration
in 20seconds.
5/16/2018 Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons Essay - slidepdf.com
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/polyaromatic-hydrocarbons-essay 22/25
Page 22 of 25
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR). Case studies in
environmental medicine; Toxicity of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs). US
Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, USA, 2009.
Anyakora, C. and Herbert, C. Determination of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons
(PAHs) in selected water bodies in the Niger Delta, African Journal of Biotechnology ,
2006, 5 (21): 2024-2031.
Bamforth, S. M. and Singleton, I. Review: bioremediation of polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons; current knowledge and future directions, Journal of Chemical Technology
and Biotechnology , 2005, 80 (7): 723-736.
Brown, G. K., Steven, D. Z. and Larry, B. B. Water analysis by gaschromatography/mass spectrometry, U.S. geological survey water resources
investigations. Proceedings of the U.S. Geological Survey Toxic Substances Hydrology
Program Technical Meeting, Contamination of Hydrologic Systems and Related
Ecosystems 1999, Charleston, South Carolina, March 8-12, 1999, report 99-4018B,
431-435.
Busetti, F., Heitz, A., Cuomo, M., Badoer, S. and Traverso, P. Determination of sixteen
polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in aqueous and solid samples from an Italian
wastewater treatment plant, Journal of Chromatography , 2006, 1102 (1-2): 104-115.
Cao, Z., Wang, Y., Ma, Y., Xu, Z., Shi, G., Zhuang, Y. and Zhu, T. Occurrence and
distribution of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in reclaimed water and surface water of
Tianjin, China, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2005, A122 (1-2): 51-59.
Crissafully, R., Milhome, M.A.L., Cavalcante, R.M., Silveira, E.R., Keukeleire, D.D. and
Nascimento, R.F. Removal of some polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from petrochemical
wastewater using low-cost adsorbents of natural origin, Bioresource Technology , 2008,
99 (10): 4515-4519.
Dionex Corporation. Determination of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in tap
water using on-line solid phase extraction followed by HPLC with UV and Flourescence
detections, Application note-213, Sunnyvale, CA, 2009, 1-8.
Fatone, F., Di Fabio, S., Bolzonella, D. and Cecchi, F. Fate of aromatic hydrocarbons in
Italian municipal wastewater systems: an overview of wastewater treatment using
conventional activated sludge process (CASP) and membrane bioreactors (MBRs), Water
Research, 2011, 45 (1): 93-104.
5/16/2018 Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons Essay - slidepdf.com
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/polyaromatic-hydrocarbons-essay 23/25
Page 23 of 25
Ferrarese, E., Andreottola, G. and Oprea, I.A. Remediation of PAH-contaminated
sediments by chemical oxidation, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2008, 152 (1): 128-
139.
Gok, O. and Sponza, D. T. Effect of rhamnolipid on the aerobic removal of polyaromatichydrocarbons (PAHs) and COD components from petrochemical wastewater. Bioresource
Technology , 2010, 101 (3): 914-924.
Haritash, A.K. and Kaushik, C.P. Biodegradation aspects of Polycyclic Aromatic
Hydrocarbons (PAHs): a review, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2009, 169 (1-3): 1-15.
Hodgeson, J.W. US EPA method 550.1: determination of polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons in drinking water by liquid-solid extraction and HPLC with coupled
ultraviolet and fluorescence detection; Bashe, W.J. and Baker, T.V. Ed.; EnvironmentalMonitoring Systems Laboratory, Office of Research and Development U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Vol. 45268, Cincinnati, Ohio, 1990, 1-22.
Kanaly, R. A. and Harayama S. Biodegradation of high-molecular-weight polycyclic
aromatic hydrocarbons by bacteria, Journal of Bacteriology , 2000, 182 (8): 2059-2067.
Lataweic, A.E. and Reid, B.J. Sequential extraction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
using subcritical water, Chemosphere, 2010, 78 (8): 1042-1048.
Ledakowicz, S., Miller, J.S. and Olejnik, D. Oxidation of PAHs in water solution by ozone
combined with ultraviolet radiation, International Journal of Photoenergy , 2001, 3 (2):
95-101.
Metcalf and Eddy, Inc. Wastewater Engineering: Treatment, Disposal, Reuse; second
edition; McGraw Hill: Boston, 1979, 276-284.
Miller, J.S., and Olejnik, D. Photolysis of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in water.
Water Research, 2001, 35 (1): 233-243.
Nagpal, N.K. Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons
(PAHs), British Columbia: Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks, British Columbia,
1993.
Perez-Gregorio, M.R., Garcia-Falcon, M.S., Martinez-Carballo, E. and Simal-Gandara, J.
Removal of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from organic solvents by waste ashes,
Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2010, 178 (1-3): 273-281.
5/16/2018 Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons Essay - slidepdf.com
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/polyaromatic-hydrocarbons-essay 24/25
Page 24 of 25
Popp, P., Correta, B., Monika M. and Albrecht, P. Determination of polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons in waste water by off-line coupling of solid-phase microextraction with
column liquid chromatography, Journal of Chromatography A, 2000, 897 (1-2): 153-
159.
Ravindra, K., Ranjeet, S. and Rene, V. G. Atmospheric polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons:
source attribution, emission factors and regulation, Atmospheric Environment , 2008, 42
(13): 2895-2921.
Shemer, H. and Linden, K.G. Photolysis, oxidation and subsequent toxicity of a mixture
of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in natural waters, Journal of Photochemistry and
Photobiology A: Chemistry , 2007, 187 (2-3): 186-195.
Southworth, G. R. The role of volatilization in removing polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbonsfrom aquatic environments, Bulletin of Environmental Contaminant Toxicology , 1979,
21 (4-5): 507-514.
Sponza, T. D. and Oztekin, R. Effect of sonication assisted by titanium dioxide and
ferrous ions on polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and toxicity removals from a
petrochemical industry waste water in Turkey, Journal of Chemical Technology and
Biotechnology , 2010, 85 (7): 913-925.
Tikilili, P.V. and Nkhalambayausi-Chirwa, E.M. Characterisation and biodegradation of
polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in radioactive wastewater, Journal of Hazardous
Materials, 2011, 192 (3): 1589-1596.
US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Agency for Toxic
Substances and Disease Registry. Potential for human exposure in toxicological profile
for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, by Public Health Service, Agency for Toxic
Substances and Disease Registry U.S. Department of Health and Human Services,
Atlanta, USA, 1995, 229-289.
US EPA. Method 610: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons; Methods for Organic Chemical
Analysis of Municipal and Industrial Wastewater ; Environmental Monitoring Systems
Laboratory, Office of Research and Development U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Cincinnati, Ohio, 1996, 1-24.
Wang, X.C., Sun,S., Ma, H.Q. and Liu, Y. Sources and distribution of aliphatic and
polyaromatic hydrocarbons in sediments of Jiaozhou Bay, Qingdao, China, Marine
Pollution Bulletin, 2006, 52 (2): 129-138.
5/16/2018 Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons Essay - slidepdf.com
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/polyaromatic-hydrocarbons-essay 25/25
Page 25 of 25
WHO. Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons. In: Guidelines for drinking-water quality,
Health criteria and other supporting information, 1998, 123-152.
Yuan, M., Shitang, T., Suoqi, Z. and Charles, Q. J. Adsorption of polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons from water using petroleum coke-derived porous carbon, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2010, 181 (1-3): 1115-1120.
Yuyun, C. and Zhu, L. Removal efficiency of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) by
different purified water techniques in Hangzhou, China, Water Resource and
Environmental Protection (ISWREP), International Symposium on, 2011, 978 (1): 1382-
1384.
Zeledon-Toruno, Z. C., Lao-Luque, C. F., De Las Heras, X. C. and Sole-Sardans M.
Removal of PAHs from water using an immature coal (leonardite), Chemosphere, 2007,67 (3): 505-512.