political parties

23
CHAPTER 9 POLITICAL PARTIES

Upload: portia

Post on 24-Feb-2016

28 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Political Parties. Chapter 9. Washington’s Farewell Address 1796. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Political  Parties

CHAPTER 9POLITICAL PARTIES

Page 2: Political  Parties

WASHINGTON’S FAREWELL ADDRESS

1796

“I have already intimated to you the danger of parties in the State, with particular reference to the founding of them on geographical discriminations. Let me now take a more comprehensive view, and warn you in the most solemn manner against the baneful effects of the spirit of party generally.”

Page 3: Political  Parties

An organization that sponsors a candidate for public office under

the organization’s name.

What is a political party?

Page 4: Political  Parties

• Nominate- (Obama) name or recruit candidates, present candidate to the voters• Inform- inform and stimulate the voters about a

candidate, pick and choose issues • Approve- keep the party bonded by approving

actions of candidate• Government- many voters decide winner by

party, Congress works on a partisan basis, and appointments are made according to party• Watchdog- party watches the conduct of those in

power, attempts to convince voters to oust those in charge

Living Room Candidate

THE FIVE FUNCTIONS OF POLITICAL PARTIES

Page 5: Political  Parties

REASONS FOR A TWO-PARTY SYSTEM

History• Federalists vs. Anti-Federalists• See Figure 9.3 (page 202)System• Plurality, winner-take-all system• Voters do not want to “waste” vote on minor party. Only

“third party” to win was the Republican party in 1860.Election Laws• Minor parties often find it difficult to flourish because

election laws have been written by officials who are members of the major parties.

• Ballots, debates, fundingPublic Opinion

Page 6: Political  Parties

CRITICAL ELECTIONS• Critical elections- An election that produces a sharp change in the

existing pattern of party loyalty among groups of voters; changed pattern is called electoral realignment.• When have there been critical elections (page 198-199):

• 1800 (EP)• 1828 (VS)• 1860 (EP)• 1896 (VS)• 1932 (VS)

• Critical elections can often led into eras of dominance for one of the major parties. Between 1800 and today, there have been four eras in which one party or another has dominated national politics.• Democrats- 1800- 1860• Republicans- 1860- 1932• Democrats- 1932-1968• Republicans- 1968-today ?

Page 7: Political  Parties

7

REPUBLICAN DOMINANCE? (1968-TODAY)

•1968 Richard Nixon (R)•1974 Gerald Ford (R)•1976 Jimmy Carter (D)•1980 Ronald Reagan (R)•1988 George H.W. Bush (R)•1992 William Clinton (D)•2000 George W. Bush (R)•2008 Barack Obama (D)

Page 8: Political  Parties

8

POLITICAL SPECTRUMThe continuum extends from left to right.

Liberal ConservativeWhat do these classifications stereotypically

imply?

Page 9: Political  Parties

9

POLITICAL SPECTRUMPolitical Spectrum

Page 10: Political  Parties

10

POLITICAL PARTIES ARE NOT BASED UPON:

Political parties use the issues as tools to persuade voters and eventually their vote.

Parties will shift positions to wherever public opinion sits.

Ex: The Republican Party will back a moderate/ liberal Republican candidate for an elected office in a predominantly Democratic area. (Senator Arlen Specter, PA. 1980-2010, Governor Mitt Romney Governor, MA. 2003-2007)

Page 11: Political  Parties

11

MAJOR PARTY PLATFORMSDemocrats• Pro-choice• Anti-war• Social programs• Public Education• Pro-unions• Same Sex marriage• Stricter Gun Control

Republicans• Pro-life• Strong National Defense• Smaller gov’t…less taxes• Vouchers• Big business• Traditional Family values• 2nd Amendment Rights

Links to the Party Platforms for 2012www.democrats.org/democratic-national-platformwww.gop.com/2012-republican-platform_home/

Page 12: Political  Parties

12

MINOR PARTIESMinor parties are third party choices that tend to fall into one of

four categories: (1) Ideological parties- devoted to an overriding set of beliefs that are radically different from the general view of society

Communist Party(2) Single issue-parties- pushes one or few issues, generally avoids all other issues

Know-Nothing, Prohibition (3) Economic protest parties- during times of economic hardship these groups form to protest the current conditions Populist party(4) Splinter/faction parties- Branches off of one of the major parties

T.Roosevelt’s- “Bull Moose” Progressive party Ross Perot- Reform Party

Page 13: Political  Parties

1. Independents2. Ticket-splitting3. Divided government4. Cynicism & political apathy5. Decentralized party structure6. Mass media7. Interest groups

Why are parties getting weaker?

Page 14: Political  Parties

“SUPPOSE YOU GO TO WASHINGTON AND TRY TO GET AT YOUR GOVERNMENT. YOU WILL ALWAYS F IND THAT WHILE YOU ARE POLITELY L ISTENED

TO, THE MEN REALLY CONSULTED ARE THE MEN WITH THE B IGGEST STAKE – THE BIG BANKERS,

THE B IG MANUFACTURERS, THE B IG MASTERS OF COMMERCE.”INTEREST GROUPS

CHAPTER 11

Page 15: Political  Parties

INTEREST GROUPS

• Definition: Any organization that seeks to influence public policy through lobbying. • Two types – institutional and membership• Institutional - deals with individuals or organizations

representing other organizations such as: business firms and unions

• Membership – deals with social, business, veteran, charitable, religious issues

• Differences among Americans has led the proliferation of interest groups• Huge variety of issues including abolition, prohibition,

gun rights, farm issues, religious associations, environmental groups, political reform, balanced budget, businesses, unions, even older Americans

See table on page 267 and 268

Page 16: Political  Parties

Reasons for Interest Groups

1. Cleavages2. Constitutional System3. Non-Profit Perks• Section 501 (c) (3)- Tax-exempt, no

lobbying or campaign contributions• Section 501 (c) (4)- Not tax-exempt, but

can lobby and give campaign contributions

4. Weakness of Political PartiesSee table on page 261

Page 17: Political  Parties

WHY JOIN?1. Solidary incentives—enjoyment, companionship

• Solidary incentives require organizations to structure themselves as coalitions of small local units

• Facilitated by the importance of local governments in the U.S.• Examples: League of Women Voters (LWV), NAACP, Rotary,

Parent-Teacher Association, American Legion2. Material incentives—money, things, services

• Organization may also influence how laws are administered to bring benefits to members

• Examples: farm organizations, AARP3. Purposive incentives—goal/purpose of the organization

itself• Though this group also benefits nonmembers, people join

because:• They are passionate about the goal(s) of the organization• They have a strong sense of civic duty• Cost of joining is minimal

Page 18: Political  Parties

FUNDING OF INTEREST GROUPS

Interest groups have long been involved in a variety of social movements such as: abolition, the environment, feminism, and unions

Funding for interest groups comes from four sources:1. Dues (*minor)2. Foundation grants3. Federal grants and contracts4. Direct mail

Page 19: Political  Parties

WHAT MAKES INTEREST GROUPS POWERFUL?

SizePower of AARP – 25% of the population 50 and over

Intensity Single-Issue groups: groups that focus on a narrow interest, dislike compromise, and often

draw membership from people new to politicsGroups may focus on an emotional issue, providing them with a psychological advantageIntensity encourages non-conventional means of participation, i.e.—protests

MoneyNot all groups have equal amounts of money.Monetary donations usually translate into access to the politicians, such as a phone call,

meeting, or support for policy.Form a PAC (Political Action Committee) – donate money to campaigns and advertisingWealthier groups have more resources— and presumably more access—but they do not

always win on policy.

Page 20: Political  Parties

INTEREST GROUPS

Linkage Institution Methods of Promoting Policy 1. Electioneering2. Lobbying Government: The

Iron Triangle (p. 190 )• Congress• President/Agency

3. Publicity/Ads4. Grassroots activities/mass

mobilization 5. Use of the courts

• amicus curiae briefs• class action suits

Methods of Promoting Policy

Interest groups pursue their goals in many arenas.

Interest groups and political parties promote U.S. democracy by linking citizens to the political process. Interest groups are distinct from parties.

Political parties fight election battles; interest groups do not field candidates for office.

Interest groups are policy specialists; political parties are policy generalists.

Discussion of AP Reading: Interconnections

Page 21: Political  Parties

REGULATING INTEREST GROUPSU.S. V. HARRISS (1954)

• In 1953, The Supreme Court upheld the Federal Regulation of Lobbying Act (1946), but narrowed its scope significantly.

• The Court determined that it applied only to paid lobbyists who directly communicated with members of Congress on pending legislation.

• This created a number of loopholes including:• It does not regulate people who give money to

influence legislation, only those who solicit or collect money.

• It does not define "principally." A lobbyist can argue that his principal goal is not influencing legislation.

• It does not include those who communicate with Congressional staffers.

Page 22: Political  Parties

THE “REVOLVING DOOR”

Here’s an interesting phenomenon?? Many people leave public office, get

hired by a PAC and then return to Washington to lobby. It can happen

over and over again (ex. Donald Rumsfeld). This can lead to a

conflict of interest and an unfair manipulation of government

agencies.

Page 23: Political  Parties

CRITICAL THINKING

Imagine you are a member of the President’s cabinet. The Treasury secretary advises that the President makes cuts in federal spending to save the economy.He/she must make some tough choices and you must advise him. The spending areas under review are:

1. Social Security2. Environmental Protection Agency 3. Women’s health clinics4. Education5. Medicare

You must get rid of one, cut spending in two, maintain spending in one, and raise spending in one.Discuss what interest groups you feel would lobby your administration before you make your decision. Consider their arguments. Explain the reasons for your choices and the potential political consequences for your decisions.