^pol k - supreme court of ohio 'ts a^ rts +.cvku, -v-p alavncss cloear,:z offos6 tba-r...
TRANSCRIPT
c CQr^^ OT-
^^^^^^ H-^-51 (9/^^^l a , - -c('(EL CU,--f-
^Pol^Kres-yL"",
^--=---^^--
^,p^
du^z^.,^
c ryL^ S ^h^Y f),^t^1_tc ra _^/+tK At
i' fi":' FaKG(11,4RT l`i O
C^T`a 0`
e, --x t ^^^^ ^n ^^r^nsC- he-^^e ^
1^
..'')4_r4L, Aen.snla_Sc,i-1-c.^
^h o S co-rs s ^,e4^- _
_.6. Yl T nt SuPre.r^c. (..' OUi'Z O^ C,'JlAi 0
'^S13o_ . ^ r^.c__9^{?sw1 F1iw.- ^h
.^L^T.C 4 D 1 S 1T4tA y`LT* =r'9" __,
Table Of Contents
Page Nos.
Explanation of why this case is a case of public or great generalInterest and involves a substantial constitutional question ............................
Statement of the Case ....................................................................... 2
Statement of the Facts ...................................................................... 2
First Proposition of Law .................................................................... 3-5
Conclusion . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .... . ... 5
Certificate of Service\ ... ... .. ... ..... .. ... .. ... . .... . . ... ... .. .. ... .. ... ... ... ............. 5
EXPLANATION OF WHY THIS CASE IS AGREAT GENERAL INTEREST AND CASE OF
INVOLVES PUBLIC ORCONSTITUTIONAL A SUBSTANTIAL
QUESTIOI^NiS iMOr revirua SeeKySe t s
f1 FlTp\'cFor CtJr,•r
T^e $VesTon oF gCe^^le
01' 46nq ty
f-.ti>u., t Jinc,C` j
CUc^t o^ fi^P(^nls ^AS ^ur^se{, ^^r^ i-cr wr.c ey^ t'lrtn^PCr[qj nt
fl 6L5-, s.; z `ct<
• cTtan -fio 2 ^}*1 tr-^ci. nOF Mnn'j^tmud V1Hn
^ tl"re lS tlc ^n^1,Srt v,
511111.1 tnTe+esr be, ^ ^n AJ-Y 3 Acrca^ tvt^G
Ruq
^-
^ce
^RcT,ed y-n ^
^Fr 1pAhinc^ -^o ett^^i, I 3`j Ct^J.Cvurs 6' ot (nw
0 ls° ^
' M'Sfg£o ktPpltcnbie C ^u4t R^te S n T^ c d. t pz^,C^-ss S
J r
T tF ^e, Locn-T' C^F A^(8^15 C[ ry [)^nn
C:^F-'tal1 P.,0.Sani 3^S '^J[" t'CS !^R-C2slc^r^
^^tr Cl.ue f aoce^S tSti t' Covpl,yd 'rh
R CASE Ct3 r-^-h ovT
6^Gi^ IX•-C'VM"T L ^
COvr^ iS neelg-d to ^e^tew re.r+eda`^r ^i^cn E e^,^GK ^^eta^nrp^^e^l "ItC cvrrex re.nedy ro {^c^o^ clcxu^c^rar^c^ ^r 4tes- re+csc^c^y
fecurd t,r,t^l d,eYnr^srrAtti tHa+ Ctu,t ^Z^les ^ r9^P^tia{e ¢^.(^S wa^nr
Cv,^ p iecl wi•Ih' rhusS
S ee^a,6 e ,
^ f -Tv1e ^tKI
Cc^ns4t^^^tc nt rssuE-S j
cCLUStnS mnter at ^Ohe^ Udtcs r^ h^^ ^li ts Cc^c r
^f `x^^t^n^s 5rc `tcd n^eAtces tnott^, ra otut trs^ Per'cz ni
T(> Ctv,i R^l^ 34 (o^) 9 Ar, F^dt=b rsbYe keme^ ^^ryy5 C ASt^ I Aer,^ V j,C Aoi1w ^tts
^hrwic^ o,F bee' lcx^^Sd i n Cbe c^r oF APpanls c^ecfsi-n r,rratnI ^TC, et^ tAute, 3c(Co).
T^t t s covr•'t is t^ ee^t [{ S^nKz oPTH^. ^+^p^ouee P,e}^reme^r.^^CO,^e S^ecur-^Ty ACr UF 1^17^{ f
i
STATEMENT OF THE CASE a' 1=AG'T_S
AQ(^rtlaOY RGgvesr^d Occo e tw,^,^ fer<a^rt^n,5 -^0 4net . 0 I.r?Wevc
Qenaf'-rs F(-or' f)PCs`%ee one6 Sl1e dtd'Y s^3^-e2 Cv^l4. t4\,e r\yu^es
6Pfoktee 5nve- Lo -h,ec one^ ^he w^s ^t ^' b^n ^vr Rt3'x.re ^^rt ,
TV,e dotvme, cm oz She So,,-tin'C RC-^cr wias nee^t^( -^^ ^tii^
(^ Vc>rr°lmq Cl%vej trnn^^s `i 1,e ^m 4oyee ^^r^ C^w,e Se_crc 4,
(A P:T- O ^ 9 `7 q CA-^^ §!h ^S r^^tl^ r flJar.T 'Tt> S u'6 -'c s of^Ftz,^
Clctz^n unlesS S^z Ilnd kLtie ^e^vestc-z^ e^c^cume. l^^c^^ ^u SuP^^ r
VVe,r Cka,vv,
(a P^ E L^¢ 2 ^ t rS ^rCes^enAenet^ ^vsm ^ 1 n F ocw.^ fl^r6-S1n^' ^4 e,
C^ &ve^Te-cl c ^ oc.^ e-^ rnt^d,^ g s rT need l n! t-,o F.1f_ ra Gl,or t^ a5 ntv, ,-t-
^'^e fll^-n . FJoW OuE ~TO T^.t nn-zure oF-Vk\^e cU.vn g -} 4,c L5 S ueiS 4^a^
tleecA prese ,ted f--l,r Aevleu-, -Tl•e clc^(u^e,wrw Are, ne.eo(tirld 13•/ 6 PP&\6^1
S c S^ e cs•.n ludgv^ me.r"rYu Ws- G1.rncw, A Rlso
(AJi^h ^nlS in i^l^nf1 CiV(JFV1Rn'S ^71Ls3 (3 fucAti'
osFe.,.sigs.
4 V) THf.. F,rS`C DlS-^Cltr't
jeeL ^5 ^,, or tl^r FR^m AePe^7 e^3 , ldv ^^Pcl^n^r w r^ 1 P^^e zact ^n^m.^ ^
{ nefC 'Fa,2urtrd CIv,l B flCeE11ITC ^^^CS WASn T C..nrnpltec4 bU1 CnCktn,(j d't.S00CS O'e,
CCvc- 06 trgvu+:ts yarjea €ifftkes rYcNka. To c^I,niss when -N+erc c.vAS rto
('[>hn5 pn ^PfryflL^S f:k"^'GnStrm 6F' Ttr"C '&o l=t\C A71Sw@'if , T\)LS i^'leccnv Ctv.i e,\i3
f1J+3Sn"t' CLx^p\ted i.e7i3'h GAUSLnS Yr raWteal ftf3uo(4te °CO i1^^6ilwh^S t.e ^1w eT S.nc^
f}ffbliee> /»o'Tio„ ^7-p prrmiss wAs ult-level ©eit oF Tionc Pen.4 Uc^f ,
A ^^'^^^AtiC SQUSIt`^ Qi^CUnSte{tfiTro^ L'XP^atnin^ '^he Ab^o Mn1
c^Ue- ^socL^s hu i e^^rx-rs ^u,^ttd,
' T' b 1 s A p p afIfo \bw. s
* ex.ku.; d
E1^11 PROPOSITION OP LAW
^rlon Tac^tfv tss ^erlu6'r Q
^. i^ ^oriSes^SS p^ E6ke rtiorlo.. Se;,yw-C c^^sm...r^n1 o^
ThC Wc^r HPPL^^'Cion dLJe TO RD L>n j \ Yri^ ^ C
(T" Civil Rvlc 34C,D).{!.C ykC S AT er & ^ttic erc'r^^ 1^'11S pIn[arn4nx
pOt.v t-n nePtls;Tlu} To f^ ^.'^+ueie,cs Lrto ^1Qn ro cAtsa,^,S ;t nca
"^'tie Cour'T of ftPPdlls Uze-d }tcsg Cn rertcs 1-0 E^cu C5 appc^t^cfs eSp^r 4^"Y APP^tInnTs w°,c ^b1S tnsTA:^r
J i^oOPQSiTIOn CIf )>9w LV;11 O}^,^1-COmL
^'- C[)nTCnT'S OF Apppil{e, VnoT'La%n `To c^tar^itr W'Mich w.lt jT^utT ^ii
CofirPI^ MAn^I ns bAcie T6 `Nne ^tSCtrcY CCYFCS•
C' 6nathkvtlOn aF }^fl S'kAktc^E O611o ^Rr'C1C,1t 11/g
Cleni\y S ^'Ares „ Che CUisYCS b£ RCesAls S),atl hAVe cxS ^nt SUrisd«t^^n
1n (c1An^{amu; Ac:cions . ^T^eres ne Ye.^u srmanY mvsv 4;avenone
Ct.vl vnr,le;\y1As C.v1S6 'bt7 tnz^.•^vkc A y^t^ncaq^,us AC;eAan
d10^ C1 e(wt T 6f R^f6ri. s t3 itve 8^Pv •^^
^ SSt7^
. ta p p ^-t
A ilYkCC-'^165 ^U TNts
f^^T Ol^,,,,,,an t^ lodga^l b.t -£we. CousT oF ApPa^t1.s ISG(r) ArAeS ^pp 6'VbOe, dotsnr cdtrpo^e -^tt.^e. ^A^-s `Chta^k -1-1^
RQ('ff1,tAn`r l1^ts ra rte^ h V -6v "he r^y 4t5rF^U1 d.ou,v c rS on ^rte.tncn' tTe A^Uv\ee ctooy Tn ^tive ^fP^tnvc
Clo(,uw,evf S )b^;T Aqccc,n A fl
-tNcse r^,,,EsTt^z(
k deg tu4'C2 i^C^ines^y Pi^rS ucanT Tp Gtu, 1
^vA^ 3ti ^b) ; S A^^^vlees f^^€enz'^^
r1ot^ Vtec n< it> C2^e ^4Cj)o jhe Pi^L,^
1an5ve5e o£ Secron C1) cl^^ay ^,-eA.tSub^eot ^o ^tne Scope vr
^lS^.(^VPT7 ^^^V ISiS^S' OF CtU. R. ^6(,L3^ ^t y S^ ^^ i q^C'('SCn W h0 C_^ci^rr^5
ulc 34Ld) iuAs
(^i'TAc,N6ei Tb Thas erafosohcn aF INuJ - s q^ct^e's ,c
"("o hiave el pe4e-^-tal CowsS oF Ac4ton ,rn.n^ evle A ^e r+l^a^ ^o e^e$c.tir
c1tSCn^tery ^S prov^cdea( Cr AA^,: S, Ruie: ,^r^S^wr^^ y
Civc R^+e `db(^&^ >L'cx^em G,^ ^r1 ^P,c^e.cn1 fUhe,tt
^c
^j^PEllarT ^oes ^C)
6 7 @ 1e^t-e7 tt ct S
PRr`Ci 15 SC*tAv Ob^a+^ c^tS(evEcy Cec^nr^^,`n actiy 2Ae.,Cy rn ^ hbT
1 W^tc1^ t a , e leVanT fu t4^2 Sulo^ec^ mta T^C t.»uelue^(o r^ the ^eTd^nS A crt
out
0jAin A ppSl4flt^C
A c^r,a, 6^4ej Q
•L-G +ht InBTn.^T YhAnctA,MUS
I ^^uc^ vnvS 't Fc,,^
STa'CZS^ ^1nn^' S^ncg ^1uc is snc ^ec^e^^n^
t^^ ^h^ C^^.^ ^^1Ls e^ P rucecf ore cloes ^ Ap^11.!
SeQ^ASe^ ^iws ,i'4,-e, A di^^;A,rc ^ee.eet^ csF l,^w
no. 6otif1
c ll5 ( k} wh.4c^ ^^,°ces °ct^^ in^ in +hi S ruiC Sl ntl bC CD^ S tcued-?:,o Rv.t ^)orcze R PAc4Y •}a ©bLc c-r1
InFucMA'^con pi-u+ec^ed b y Arty yD rtvcleqt a'eCqoized 6y Iq, -
AC^R^n S6ncP" f^eP^llce con'Ten.'ts a^ rTS +.cvku, -V-p ALavnCSS cloear,:Z
ofFos6 tba-r AP?Gu""T dfles„r haVt A r15-k•r To The documenr ^rtcm o ts
APe6-Nee ciUrcy lro ^tv^^c(e e'loee;w,entt -'GO (3^PsUnnT °t'1,,t^ (r'.U,i K,,,ie ^i5 ^sL n rafPA,inb^l
S0
'ra ^C1,ls ins-rnn-T ^e,`ec, jee^,^evir^ fiPPaittt^s moTtur `rz> p"ms.
^t, CDOc;lOs,on Ccv,l I66Le is cnnp^i^^x^te -co tiffstteFs
dere"S[.^ sincg Su^^ec,T -i^V *l.e ScoP2 0^' ^Jisca,rQry oF Cw1 ^^.,^e '^6(-eJp ^SLF)
rnvors RpMliA, c ,
(r01,n5 A MQ iuN ec fi ^ a,<lamus i s a w ^ c ^C^hm riq.nc^.Un^
^Q{"^lXr+tnncp; p^ Q 3t !e[,r W6c1q •('l.e IAtN Sipe ct ally k,ni 'pinS GiS Adu`ty ricSvlti.r,^
f I^Uri/ t1/1 ©cFI(u "(TU$(' o;`.^^In.•rlot'N. `ln CJnderlyin5 AC:T lsriT rle.ectad +D C'e e8'(
f^ 1^pnda-av^. tc.
Now 6-atn5 •{ 0 ha,, >1,e, cex,r~c- oF ,qpP^Ats
(^(^a^flceS M61con To VJtsrtSS l^se m"T Vlew T^ AGtvntCRS6 dbc;teT 4P
^P^stjrke ^uie i 5. AP^^tlalc ^4^i^ t5 cuaar T CamPtt W lh stnc&
^cuc^ a^ ^iPP^"ls 5flVe A ^leies^ bon e^ore {^2 it 3ne r-rame tnhwr^ wh^^, A p^ auro^^°t^' °(^'^^ t1^ APq^tke-s +rnort^r
Cr ^tsmcsS htioi^xp^r^^aPP6tfnnt R^l$JS 5 t'rLS j1[1 (ld^P^SA4T(tc p ^ Q dery s-rc> ofPz)s o,r^ o^
^t^T w; ^t s12n,^1^ ^'r&! te rler^ i^-^• MeTton pc^
"e p^e m^f a^ ^ ^txi^ ^t •"e Ccx rt oF R.Ce ^^S
Pieg&n.6d d rnrt. .o.tym
^^i?1es ^! y^kb . ^is _rer^^-rhe_.^purT_c9F F^aAg A1s
A cnfy eF -t^,Ls ^ore^..^ wwr^n bAS lee; se^r Lddu.e.sg-^r^c^ ___ _-_----
LOCAAn At1_ ^h2 €1ke ( e SGaic^ ^^ CO'-CS yz^v^
^ri this ^1^^ g}h "t'La1--
^nipdo a^o u3be y
lCCt)A- A
July 14, 2009
AMIRAH SULTAANA16410 SCOTTSDAI-E BLVDSHAKER HTS, OH 44120
Re: AT&T Pension Benefit Plan - Midwest Program, the "Plan"
Dear Amirah Sultaana:
Fidelity Service Center1-800-416-2363
International AccessDial AT&T Direct® access number,
then 800-416-2363TDD Service for the Hearing Impaired
1-888-343-0860
This letter is in response to your recent mailing to the Fidelity Service Center. We have received a copy of thenotarized "Petition For Writ of Mandamus" that you recently filed with the State of Ohio. Once a Court OrderedSubpoena is obtained, please forward the document to the Fidelity Service Center at the address listed below, ifneeded.
As defined under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), you have the right to file aformal claim, if you believe that any of the information on record regarding your pension benefits and/or AT&Tsavings plan account is incorrect. To make an official claim for benefits as outlined In your plan's Summary PlanDescription, you must complete and return all original pages of the Claim Inltlation Form that was previously sentto you on May 27, 2009.
The Spread Sheet for Final Calculation Version 022 is not required In order to file a clalm against the Plan. FinalCalculation Version 022 was completed by the prior record keeper and was provided to Fidelity at conversion.Since Fidelity did not complete this calculation, details cannot be provided. Fidelity Investments was only providedwith the Accrued Benefit amount and the Lump Sum amount that was paid out in 2001, and not the actual detailsof this calcufation.
If you have any questions, please call the Fidelity Service Center toll-free at 1-800-416-2363, Monday throughFriday (excluding New York Stock Exchange holidays), between 8:30 a.m. and Midnight, Eastern Time to speakwith a service associate. Froin outside the U.S., dial your country's toll-free AT&T Direct access number thenenterB00-416-2363. In the U.S., call 1-800-331-1140 to obtain AT&T Direct access numbers. From anywhere inthe world, access numbers are available online at www.att.com/traveler or from your local operator.
Slncerely,
Fidelity Service CenterPO Box 770003Cincinnati, OH 45277-0070
13 k^ 41a LT ^
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORI'
Appellant/plaintiff is a pro ss litigant seeking discovery of documentation of records and
calculations related to her retirement account and recovery efforts by the plan administration
relative to overpayinent of benefits to the Appellant/plainfiff.
In written communications, as attached to Appellant/plaintiff's request for writ, she was
advised that the documentation/calculations sought from Appellcc/defendant was completed by
the prior record keeper. The detailed infonnation sought is not in the possession of this party and
should be sought from the prior record keeper, not Fidelity. The "version 022" information
sought is not in Fidelity's possession. Fidelity has repeatedly provided to Appellant/plaintiff the
documentation and calculations of her benefits. (See attached composite exhibit "A", redacted to
protect personal and financial information from disclosure.)
The Appellant seeks a writ by this court with no underlying matter. Further, the plaintiff
possesses remedies at law pursuant to Civ. R. 34(D) for which this writ is urmecessary. As such,
Appellant/plaintiff's request for writ should be denied.
Respectfully s}r*itte
olin F. Bodie, Jr. (005
(419) 2A9-7151 FacsimileE-Mail: bodie(a^,naarshall-melhorn.comAttosney for Defendant/Appellee,Fidelity Employer Services Cornpany,1,.1,.C.
Four SeaGate, 8th FlooToledo, Ohio 43604(419) 249-7100
Marshall & Mclhorn,
Attachment not scannecl
,i'atr.'s.cia M. Clancy - Clerk of Courts Page 1 of 2
You Are Not Currently Logc
amiitan County Courthow000 Main Streetincinnati, OH 45202
• Home A Court Records .d Court Date
Case Summary
A Forms
Case Number: C 0900575
Case Caption: STATE OF OHIO EX REL AMIRAH SULTAANA vs. FIDELITY INVESTMENTS
Judge: Unavailable
Filed Date: 8/17/2009
Case Type: A109 - WRIT OF MANDAMUS - PETITION - TAXED IN COSTS.
Total Deposits: $ 100.00 Credit
Total Costs: $ 94.00
Case History
Doc Image# Date
123 10/28/2009
Iol 10l28/2009
8 10/28/2009
10/19/2009
* 10/19/2009
GI 10/14/2009
10/6/2009
^ 10/6/2009
f°*J 10/6/2009
10/5/2009
9/30/2009
8 9/30/2009
fs^ 9/30/2009
IT, 9/30/2009
8 9/22/2009
A Services ^ D
Description
RELATOR'S REPLY TO RESPONDENT'S OPPOSITION TO RELATOR'SRECONSIDERATION REQUEST WITH NOTICE ALERT
NOTICE OF ORDER OR JUDGMENT SENT BY ORDINARY MAIL TO ALLPARTIES REQUIRED BY LAW.
ENTRY OVERRULING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
COSTS PAID BY AND CHECK ISSUED TO: STATE OF OHIO EX RELAMIRAH SULTAANA
DEFT-APPELLEE, FIDELITY EMPLOYER SERVICES LLC'S OPPOSITIONTO PLTF-CLAIMANT'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION PURSUANT TO APPELLATE RULE 26(B) (FINDING OF FACT REQUEST)
MOTION TO LEAVE TO CORRECT/CHANGE RESPONDENTS NAME
MOTION TO STRIKE RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME WITHMOTION TO STRIKE RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO DISMISS
RELATOR'S OPPOSITION TO RESPONDENTS MOTION TO DISMISS
MOTION TO DISMISS OF DEFT-APPELLEE FIDELITY INVESTMENTS
NOTICE OF ORDER OR JUDGMENT SENT BY ORDINARY MAIL TO ALLPARTIES REQUIRED BY LAW.
NOTICE OF ORDER OR JUDGMENT SENT BY ORDINARY MAIL TO ALLPARTIES REQUIRED BY LAW.
ENTRY OVERRULING MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT AND ORSUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS
ENTRY OVERRULING MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT AND/ORSUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS
MOTION TO DISMISS OF DEFT/APPELLEE, FIEDLITY INVESTMENTS(SIC)
Case C
Case HistoryCase ScheduleCase Documen
Document Req
Party/Attorney ICertified Mail SNew Case Seai
New Name Sea
Add Case to M}
Amoi
6.0(
http://www.courtclerk.org/case_summary.asp?sec=history&casenumber=C 0900575 11/12/2009
Patricia M. Clancy - Clerk of Courts Page 2 of 2
8 9/22I2009 MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT AND OR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
9/1412009 MOTION TO EXTEND TIME
FO, 8124/2009ELECTRONIC POSTAL RECEIPT RETURNED, COPY OF WRIT OFMANDAMUS AND SUMMONS DELIVERED TO FIDELITY INVESTMENTSON 08/19/09, FILED. [CERTIFIED MAIL NBR.: 7194 5168 6310 0463 9993]
rol 8/1712009 SUMMONS ISSUED BY CERTIFIED MAIL TO FIDELITY INVESTMENTS
8117/2009 CERTIFIED MAIL SERVICE ISSUED TO FIDELITY INVESTMENTS[CERTIFIED MAIL NBR.: 7194 5168 6310 0463 9993]
8/17/2009. ISSUE DESK - DEPOSIT BY AMIRAH L SULTAANA 100.C
8 8117/2009 PETITION IN MANDAMUS FILED
8/17/2009 TAXED IN COSTS - FILING STATE OF OHIO EX REL AMIRAH SULTAANA 0.01
About the Clerk I FAQ I Ltnks I Directions I Poifcies I Contact Us I Site Map
Alternate languages: Deutsch I Espa(iol I Francais I Italiano
© 2009 Patricia M. Clancy, Hamltton County Clerk of Courts. All rights reserved.
bttp:1/www.coultclerk.org/case_summary.asp?see=bistory&casenumber=C 0900575 11/12/2009
IN THE COURT OF APPF.AL.SFIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO
HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO
STATE OF OHIO, ex rel. CASE NO. C-ogo575AMIRAH SULTAANA,
Relator,
vs. ENTRY OVERRULING MOTION FORDEFAULT JUDGMENTAND/ORSUMMARY JUDGMENT ANDGRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS
FIDELITY INVESTMENTS,
Respondent.
This cause came on to be considered upon the petition for writ of mandamus,
the respondent's motion to extend time, the relator's motion for default judgment
and/or summary judgment, and the respondent's motion to dismiss.
The Court finds that the motiO to-dismiss is well taken and is granted. The
requisites for mandamus are well established: (i) the relator must have a clear, legal
right to the requested relief, (2) the reslionder,t must have a clear, legal duty to
perform the requested relief and Wthere must be no adequate remedy at law.
The relator's motion for default judgment and/or summary judgm'ent is not
well taken and is overivled.
To The Clerk:
Enter upo^. the Journal of the Court on SE P 3 0 2009 per order of the court.'
sy: (Copies sent to all counsel)
1 State ex rel. Ney v. Niehaus (I9&7), 33 nhio St.3d 118, 515 N.E.2d 914.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALSFIRST APPEI.LATE DISTRICT OF OHIO
I3AMILTON COUNT'Y', OHIO
S'FATE OF OHIO, ex rel. CASE NO. C-090575AMIRAI3 SULTAANA,
Relator,
vs.
FIDELPI'Y INVESTiVIENTS,
Respondent.
ENTRY OVERRULING MOTIONFOR RECONSIDERATION
Tiris cause came on to be considered upon the motion of the petitioner for
reconsideration and upon the mernorandum in opposition.
The Court finds that the motion is not well taken and is overruled. The
petition did not establish the requisites for mandamus, which include: (i) the relator
must have a clear, legal right to the requested relief, (2) the respondent must have a
clear, legal duty to perform the requested relief and (g) there must be no adequate
remedy at law. l
All other motions are overruled as moot.
To The Clerk:
Enter upon t^ie Journal of the Court on OCT 2 8 2009per order of the court.
Sy: zv/T-"-`- --- 4 (Copies sent to all counsel)e
1 Stctte ex rel. Ney v. Niehaus (1987), 33 Ohio St3d 119, 515 N.E.2d 914.