pms 2011 @ scan copy
TRANSCRIPT
8/3/2019 Pms 2011 @ Scan Copy
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/pms-2011-scan-copy 1/4
&,nrx
PMS Form 2011
Name of Appraise: SATYANARAYAN pRASAD
Department CUSTOMER SUppORT
Designation/ Level: ASST. ENGINEER
Datei 14-12-2011
Name ofAppraiser/s; Mr. MITHUN HALDER
Enclose the print out of filled-in lpC for the year 20j 1 from eKpl application or Kpl ExcelFormat
.tobe filled by appraisee
Commentslndividual: As per my capability and experience , I filled my Kpt and pN,4S.
Reviewer/sl
DeAAel HR . . . . . Makihs .tinar'dce to the Reat wort.t ot ou. orsanization
2011 KPt tPc (100%) V&C (optional)lndividual Evaluation yf tvl .score- 120Boss Evaluation YTI\,,I Score
8/3/2019 Pms 2011 @ Scan Copy
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/pms-2011-scan-copy 2/4
A1af n FLTd
Questionnaire
To be filledbythe Appraisee and submitted to the Appraiser/ Reporting Manager 2 days before theReview Discussion. appraiserto tick on the relevant option once reviewed.(pls attach additionalsheets
if required)
(j Com pletely Agree (: Partially Agree
[) oisagree
1. During this review period (.la n ,Dec 2011) what went well? What were your achtevementslot down vour r€asons for su.cFss
1.TTSL ODC Project Completed properlv.
7. TowerVrs.on sirF'a Auronatior & Reworn
3. Viom solar site in Bihar & lharkhand Automation with RMS.
4. Over all year achieved 5LA 84%
2. During this year, what could have been better? What did not go well? Ment on your reasons for thisdisaooointment or fa il! re
[.- com pletely ngree [j PartiallyAgree
3. What has been yoLrr learning during thls
fl otsagre e
pe.iod? How do you plan to utilize this learning next year?
1. IPMS, SIVICS &Solar Site lea.ning this period and ffom this product want to utj ize field work.
Appraiserviews:
D com pletely ngree f: Partially ACree
rt do you require from
e completely Agree Epartiallyqgree Cotsagree
5. During theyear
haveyou
been Guided or Counseled by your reporiin€ Manager. Mention 12 instanceswhen such guidance has inspired you.
Yes/ No NO
How many tjmes-
Appraisers comments(if any)i
Sign ofAppraiser:
6 t" o" a"a w"aa.r.
uire regular update & extra support required
8/3/2019 Pms 2011 @ Scan Copy
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/pms-2011-scan-copy 3/4
&,xl:a
Critical Success Attributes -(Ratings: 1-Need lmprovement, 2- Average, 3- Good, 4- Very cood, s-OuGtanding)
Training Need ldentification: (Appraiser & Appraisee needs to fill the areas on
the Excel sheet attached)
Sign ofAppr€iser
iretlt€r HB . . . . - Maktns crfference tu
Attributes RatingSubstantiate
rating withReference
Appraisee Appraiser1. Currentjob responsibilily rnalches with currentskilJ sets Yes/No/Paftially
Parliallv2. Has Poteniialto lake up additionalroles &rcsponsibilities
YES
3. Job Proportion in %Rouhne job
90
10
4. Leadership skills:- LAb lty ro l-andle tean.
mature & balanced in decision making)Rating (1-5)
4
5. Convincing skills- (Abiliiy to satjsfyinternal/external customerc queries effectively)
Ratjnq (1-5):
6. Contlict Resolution:- (Ability to go to the rootcause & find a long ierm solution)
Rating (1-5)
7. Dependability & Result Orientation:-(Dependable and owns the task assigned)
Raling (1-s):
L Team Work:- (Accepted & respected by team.Demonstrates understandlng & sensitivity to crossfunctional dependencies, Can mentor juniors andshare knowledge)
Rating (1-5):
9. Takes lnitiatives:- (make extra efforis/initjalivesto fulfill tasks/goals)
Raiing (1-5):4
1 0. Customer(intemal/external) focus! (strive fortherr satjsfaction) Rating (1-5)i
4
8/3/2019 Pms 2011 @ Scan Copy
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/pms-2011-scan-copy 4/4
-^1.1r I\'El ],a
Guidelines for performance Review
lnterpretation of Overall Category Rating:
Category A: Outstanding performanceCategory B: V.Good PerformanceCategory Ci Good Performance
Category D&E: Average performance & Needs lmprovement
Normalization (A bellcurve): Forced Ranking MethodOverallCategory Rating as per the Appraiser. kindly followforced ranktng method given in cuidelines:
P
t
1
ltt
ll
No .f'leam a*"mber6 -----t
All the Line Managers are requested to follow the same normalization pattern so that evaluation isdone as per the performance standards and justify the outcome in term; of quantitative results.
Q!.ri!a Htrl Makinq .tifference to the Rear wo d of ouf o.ganizanon