p.m.e.p. registration no. om 82-1-c-l - ontario

33
52Ne4NW8012 63.4118 DOME TWP 010 BLUESTACK RESOURCES LIMITED P.M.E.P. Registration No. OM 82-1-C-l REPORT ON EXPLORATION PROGRAM ON RED LAKE MINING CLAIMS 1982 February 11, 1983. James M. Patterson fo3.4l(8

Upload: others

Post on 19-Oct-2021

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: P.M.E.P. Registration No. OM 82-1-C-l - Ontario

52Ne4NW8012 63.4118 DOME TWP 010

BLUESTACK RESOURCES LIMITED

P.M.E.P. Registration No. OM 82-1-C-l

REPORT ON EXPLORATION PROGRAM

ON

RED LAKE MINING CLAIMS

1982

February 11, 1983. James M. Patterson

fo3.4l(8

Page 2: P.M.E.P. Registration No. OM 82-1-C-l - Ontario

ea.41 IB DOME TWP010C

Map # l

2

3

4

5

5a

6

6a

7

7 a

S

9

10

11

MAPS

Soil Geochemistry - Cu

Soil Geochemistry - Pb

Soil Geochemistry - Zn

Soil Geochemistry - Au, Ag

Basal Till Geochemistry - Cu

Basal Till Geochemistry - On-Ice - Cu

Basal Till Geochemistry - Zn

Basal Till Geochemistry - On-Ice - Zn

Basal Till Geochemistry - Au

Basal Till Geochemistry - On-Ice - Au

G o o p h y s i c s - K . M . C o n d u c t o r s

G e o p h y s i c s - M a 7, n e t om e t. e r S u r v e y

Geology

Diamond Drill Hole Locations

Fig. # l

2

3

4

LJLJL LlJi - s

Location Map of Claims

Cumulative Frequency (cf) curve

Cumulative Frequency (cf) curve

Cumulative Frequency (cf) curve

Cu

Pb

Zn

APPENDICES

Appendix "l

Appendix "2

Geopnysics

Geology

John L

John F

Bet z, 1982

Whit ton, 1982

Page 3: P.M.E.P. Registration No. OM 82-1-C-l - Ontario

BLUESTACK RESOURCES LIMITED

O.M.E.P. Registration No. OM 82-1-C-l

Report to Accompany Application For Grant

1. LOCATION

The property on which work was carried out under the

above registration comprises 77 claims, patents and leases in the

Slate Bay Area, McDonough and Dome Townships of Red Lake Mining

Division (Fig. l).

2. SYNOPSIS OF WORK COMPLETED

Bluestack Resources Limited continued exploration on its

property in McDonough and Dome Townships in the Red Lake Area of

Ontario. Work this year involved soil geochemical surveys of the

total land area of the property with samples taken every 50 ft. on

lines 400 ft. apart. In some areas a closer spaced line interval

was used. Basal till sampling was undertaken over some coincident

geochemical and geophysical anomalies on land while E.M. conductors

under Red Lake were investigated by sampling from the ice during

late winter 1982. Geological mapping was carried out using the

grid as above and a comprehensive geological map produced. The

locations of diamond drill hole collars were ascertained where

possible and a plan prepared showing the location of all the drilling

undertaken on the property from 1937 to 1967 (Map 11).

3. GEOCHEMISTRY

The long strike extent of the E.M. anomalies and the broad

magnetic anomalies required that some additional work be carried out

in an effort to more advantageously select drill targets. As base

metals were known to be associated with some of these anomalies geo

chemistry was utilized. The off-shore anomalies under the waters of

Slate Bay were investigated by basal till sampling while a soil

Page 4: P.M.E.P. Registration No. OM 82-1-C-l - Ontario

- 2 -

survey was carried out on the land section of the property. This

in turn was followed up by basal till sampling.

3.1 Soil Survey

A total of 1962 samples was collected by grub hoe and auger

from beneath the organic rich soil horizon. All samples were analysed

for Cu, Pb, Zn, Ag and Au. Results are presented on Maps l, 2, 3,

and 4. Statistical treatment of the data was undertaken for Cu, Pb

and Zn only as the data for Ag was uniformly low and Au data is in

complete due to insufficient sample in some instances allowing only

a detection limit of 50 ppb. However taking this restriction into

account anomalous values were encountered and the map is useful.

The statistical data for Cu, Pb and Zn is as follows:

Cu

ppm

M 9

M+S 20

M+2S 34

M+3S 47

The results have been colour coded using the above as a

guideline and the colours display the anomalous areas clearly.

Geological mapping (Map 10) shows large areas of overburden which

will obviously reduce the geochemical response of sub-outcropping

mineralization. These overburden areas are also indicated by the

E.M. map (Map 8) so that a lack of geochemical response within these

areas is expected.

As noted above the purpose of the geochemical survey is to

seek positive indications of mineralization. Where such a positive

indication coincides with a good geophysical response then such an

area is deemed a prime drill target. The absence of geochemical

response in an area of geophysical response may be solely a factor

of increasing overburden depths.

Pbppm

6.5

11.0

17.521.5

Zn

ppm

42

79

135

225

Page 5: P.M.E.P. Registration No. OM 82-1-C-l - Ontario

- 3 -

Copper

The copper results are presented on Map l and the colour

code selected is based on the data derived from the cumulative

frequency (cf) curve presented in Fig. 2.

Yellow: 0-20 ppm The 20 ppm level is the M+S for the data.This can be regarded as background to high back ground.

21 - 30 ppm, and reflects the high background to anomalous

31 - 40 ppm and straddles the M+2S which is definitely anomalous

Orange

Green:

Blue:

Red:

Lead

41 - 50 ppm and straddles the M+3S and presents a strong anomaly.

Greater than 50 ppm and represents first class copper anomalies.

The data for lead is based on 1500 samples (Fig. 3) and

shows a very low response. Following through from the Cu colour code the following scheme is developed.

Yellow;

Orange:

Green:

Blue:

Red:

0-10 ppm

11 - 15 ppm

16 - 20 ppm

21 - 25 ppm

25 ppm

i.e. O - M+S

i.e. M+S to just below M+2S (Anomalous)i.e. Definite anomaly

i.e. Strong anomaly

i.e. First Class anomaly

Zinc

The zinc cf curve is presented in Fig. 4.

scheme evolved is as follows;

The colour

Yellow: 0-50 ppm

Orange: 51 - 100 ppm

Green: 101 - 200 ppm

Blue: 201 - 300 ppm

Red: 300 ppm

Background

Weak anomaly

Definite anomaly

Strong anomaly

First Class anomaly

Page 6: P.M.E.P. Registration No. OM 82-1-C-l - Ontario

- 4 -

3.2 Basal Till Sampling

The basal till sampling comprised two programs, one from

the ice on Red Lake in early 1982 and a program on land during

summer 1982.

The program from the ice was designed to investigate a

series of parallel E.M. anomalies located to the south of the Slate

Bay Peninsula and under the waters of Red Lake. A total of 282 holes

was drilled for the recovery of 230 samples. Sample loss occurred

where no basal till was developed and unconsolidated lake sediments

immediately overlie bedrock. In some instances rock samples were

recovered and again two of these showed visible sulphides - pyrrhotite

and pyrite. A total of 3,452 metres (11,250 ft.) was drilled with

2,312 metres (7,540 ft.) in overburden and the balance of 1,140 metres

(3,710 ft.) in water. This gives mean hole of 12 metres (40 ft.)

with 4 m (13 ft.) in water and 8 m (27 ft.) in overburden. Samples

were analysed for Cu, Zn, Ag and Au and the results of this program

are shown on Maps 5a, 6a k 7a. These show sporadic high values for

Zn which are highly anomalous against the general background. Two

values of note occur at the southern end of the sampling grid where

zinc values of 230 and 910 ppm occur 200 ft. apart. The 910 value

is open to the south and has a coincident 210 ppm Cu. These values

are associated with E.M. anomalies 'J 1 and 'K' (Map 8).

The onshore basal till program was undertaken to investigate

the surface geochemical anomalies near E.M. anomalies associated with

mineralization known to exist on claims 2206 k 2208. Trenching in

this area in late 1981 showed the presence of significant Ag, Cu and

Au values while drilling in 1962 had indicated the persistence of

this mineralization at depth. A surface zinc anomaly with a strong

associated copper anomaly with values up to 1770 ppm Cu, was invest

igated and values up to 5900 ppm Cu and Zn returned from basal till

samples. The anomaly was extended further to the north-east to line

84E where a 520 and 250 ppm Cu are present in basal till samples.

(Maps 5, 6 61 7). Silver values are associated with some of the

higher Cu values.

Page 7: P.M.E.P. Registration No. OM 82-1-C-l - Ontario

- 5 -

Geochemical Analyses

Geochemical analyses of some of the samples were carried

out by X-Ray Assay Laboratories Ltd., Toronto, while the balance

were analysed by O'Neill-McHugh Laboratories Ltd. in Ireland. The

samples from the area where gold values were expected were analysed

by X-Ray Lab using the Direct Current Plasma (DCP) technique and

gave a much lower detection limit. The balance of the samples were analysed by AA techniques with Au determined after ignition and

MIBK extraction. The detection limit for Au here is 5 ppb, where

sufficient sample is available. Insufficient sample in some instances

caused high detection limits of 50 ppb but overall results are accept

able in that spotty anomalies occur. Comparison of the two labs

was carried out by running a common batch of samples and results

were found to be acceptable.

4. GEOPHYSICS

Additional E.M. and magnetometer surveys were carried out

during 1982 to complete the survey partially completed in 1981.

Additional detail was carried out. A report on this work together

with maps by Consultant John Betz Ltd. is attached, (Appendix I)

while composite maps presenting the combined results from the con

solidation of both surveys are also included (Maps 8 k 9).

5. GEOLOGY

Geological mapping was completed using the grid for

control and Map 10 and Appendix 2 present the results of this

survey.

JMP/v

February 11, 1983.is M. Patterson, Ph.D.,

Page 8: P.M.E.P. Registration No. OM 82-1-C-l - Ontario

(Joion ?ninW(416) 621-6682 7 BOXBURY ROAD OCtObOL" 1 982.

ETOBICOKE, ONT.

CANADA. M9C 2W l

REPORT ON THE ELECTROMAGNETIC AND MAGNETIC SURVEYS

BLUESTACK RESOURCES LIMITED

RED LAKE PROJECT

TOWNSHIPS (W Mc-DONOGH ,S DOME

DISTRICT OF' PATRICIA, ONTARIO

LIST OF CONTENTS

Page

INTRODUCTION ]

PRESENTATION OF RESULTS S INTERPRETATION 2

DISCUSSION OF THE INTERPRETATION 2

CONCLUDING REMARKS 4

WRITER'S DECLARATION 4

MAXM3N II SPEC SHEETS

POCKET -- Plans l 6- 2

l

Page 9: P.M.E.P. Registration No. OM 82-1-C-l - Ontario

INTRODUCTION

As stated in ray report of October 1981, the objective of the

electromagnetic and magnetic surveys on this property was to

detect and outline all conductive and magnetic bedrock zones with

a view to ultimately finding economic mineralization (gold, in

particular) associated with these zones. The electromagnetic and

magnetic coverage of 1982 was intended to plug up 'holes' left

in the coverage of 1981, due to 'bad 1 ice on parts of the lake.

At the same time, some fill-in lines were put in and run, based

on the interpretation of the 1981 results.

The MaxMin II EM (electromagnetic) system was used on this

project. This system d s manufactured by Apex Parametrics Ltd of

Stouffville, Ontario. The methods of operating this system are

amply described in the operations manual and they will not be

repeated here. However, a copy of the specification sheet and a

picture of the system in operation are included at the end of

this report.

For this project, the MaxMin II was used in the maximum coupled

coplanar mode with the turns of the transmitting and receiving

coils held essentially parallel to the surface of the ground.

When working in flat terrain, this mode of operation is the well-

known horizontal-loop mode. The general survey specifications

were: a 200 ft coil spacing and a 50 ft station spacing at fre

quencies of 222, 3555 and sometimes 888 Hz. This was supplemented

by a 100 ft coil spacing and a 25 ft station spacing in one small

part of the grid specifically on Lines 64E, 66E, 68E 6* 7 O K. The

line spacing remained generally at 400 ft, with a few intermediate

lines being added as shown on the accompanying plan.

The magnetometer equipment used in this project was: the G-816

proton precession, as a field unit; and the GSM-8 oroton presession

and C.M.G. MR-10 recorder as a base station unit. The G-816, GSM-8

and C.M.G. MR-10 are manufactured by EG&G Canada, Exploranium

Geometrics Division, Downsview, Ontario; G FM Systems, Inc., Don

Mills, Ontario; and Canadian Mining Geophysics, Ottawa, Ontario,

respectively. The specifications for, and methods of operating,

these systems are amply described in the operations manuals. They

will not be repeated here.

Page 10: P.M.E.P. Registration No. OM 82-1-C-l - Ontario

-2-

The EM and magnetic field work and the plotting of the results

were carried out by geophysical contractor, Mr. W. Barclay of

Toronto, Ontario. The contouring of the magnetic results was also

done by Mr. W. Barclay. The interpretation of all the results

was carried out by geophysical consultant, John E. Betz, the

author of this report.

The claim numbers covered by the 1982 project are shown on the

two plans included with this report.

PRESENTATION OF THE RESULTS S INTERPRETATION

The conductor interpretation, based on the MaxMin I I results

is shown on Plan l in the pocket at the end of the report. The

magnetic contour picture is on Plan 2. Both plans are at a scale

of l : 4800.

Both the MaxMin II and G-816 results have been plotted in pro

file form. Although these profiles were used in the interpretation,

they are not included in this report. They are in the possession

of Bluestack Resources Limited in Toronto.

NF THE NTERP RTATION

This report was composed specifically to meet the 1982 assessment

requirements, and it deals only with the results pertinent to

this purpose. For this reason, the maps accompanying this report

contain only the conductor interpretation, and the iso-magnetic

contour patterns, in the regions surveyed during this past winter.

However, at this writing separate comprehensive maps of the 1982

and 1981 interpretations are being prepared.

The reader is referred to my report of October 1981, for a

basic discussion of the conductive and magnetic zones on this grid.

The results of 1982 have merely refined the conductive and magnetic

pictures of 1981, by filling in the gaps and improving the reso

lution of closely-spaced parallel conductors. But, the main message

of 1981 remains the same. The present report will deal only with

poi:,ls not macle in last year's report.

An attempt, has been made on Plan l, accompanying this report,

to retain the letter designation, started in 1981, for the various

conductive zones on the grid. Alas, the improved resolution and

fill-in coverage of the 1982 MaxMin survey have resulted in the

Page 11: P.M.E.P. Registration No. OM 82-1-C-l - Ontario

-3-

appearance of new conductive zones, between zones which had already

been given a letter designation in alphabetical order.

As described in ray 1981 report, upper case letters were assigned

to each conductor, and a numerical subscript was given to each

letter following a break, or gap, along the length of the conductor.

With the appearance of 'new' conductors between the 'old', it was

necessary to re-use some of the earlier upper case letters, sub

scripting them with lower case letters to distinguish between 'old'

and 'new 1 . The latter point can be best appreciated by superim

posing Plan #1 of this report on Plan l of my 1981 report. In any

event, one of the two comprehensive plans being prepared will

unify the conductive pictures of the 1981 and 1982 reports.

It is not surprising to see a somewhat modified conductor picture

on the western half of the grid, because of the greater resolving

power and gap-filling nature of the '82 MaxMin coverage in this

very complex situation. The situation is less complex on the

eastern half of the grid; so, good correspondence between the "81

and '82 conductors is to be expected. However, the '82 version

of conductors N ? and P is about 100 ft further south than the '81

version on Lines 140F, and l 44E--suggestive of a discrepency in the

chaining results between the two field seasons.

Another possible discrepency exists between the chaining results

of '81 and '82. This is on Lines 112E, 116E and 120E in the region

of 8+OOS to 12+OOS. In '81, a conductor, designated 'D', was in

terpreted on Line 120E between 11+OOS S, 1 2 + OOS, and on Line 112E

between 8+OOS and 9+OOS. This conductor was presumed to cross

Line 116E around 10+OOS, although there was no data on this line.

Alas, the MaxMin results of "82 show a conductor between 7+50S

and 8-fOOS on Line 116E, giving an unlikely northward kink in

conductor D. The alternative interpretation is conductor EI,

shown on Plan l of this report. However, conductor Ei could be the

artefact of a chai.ning error on Line 116E.

Also of note in the '82 MaxMin results are:

a) An unusual-looking MaxMin profile exists south of conductor J j

on Line 112E. There is a hint of a flat-lying conductor or a con

ductor running sub-parallel to the line in this area, and more

data would be required to clarify this matter.

b) There is evidence of a fault between Lines 40E and 44E as sug

gested by the interpreted small offset between conductors H s Ha

Page 12: P.M.E.P. Registration No. OM 82-1-C-l - Ontario

and J S Ji. Again a possible 'offset 1 in the chaining results on

these two lines must also be considered, and more data would be

required to clarify this matter.

A few final words on the complex conductor picture on the west

half of the grid; In places, the conductors are too-closely-spaced

for complete resolution by a coil spacing as small as 200 ft. There

are quite possibly more conductive bands than shown on Plan 1.

This matter could be resolved still further with a 100 ft coil

spacing. But a few long drill holes would do a better job of

resolving the picture, yielding much geological information as

we 1 1 .

CONCLUDING Rl'MARK?

Although there is a place for more detailing work, as described

toward the end of the preceding section, there exists in the

present interpretation a wealth of information to follow through

on. When the comprehensive plans of the '81 k '82 conductor and

magnetic contour pictures are completed, there will be a large

basis for geological pursuit.

Unfortunately, there is no simple correlation that I know of

between conductive zones, magnetic zones and gold occurrences.

Nonetheless, the obvious starting point for utilizing the inter

pretation of this and my '81 report is to relate it to all of the

geological and geochemical information known to date. This exer

cise is left to the personnel of Bluestack Resources Ltd.

Neither I, nor John Betz Limited, have any financial interest

in any of the properties of Bluestack Resources Ltd. or any of

its joint venture partners.

I hold B. A. (1952) and M. A. (1953) degrees in geophysics from

the University of Toronto.

I have worked full-time in mining exploration geophysics since

1953, and two sunnier seasons prior to 1953.

All statements made in this report are correct to the best of

my knowledge.

Etobicoke, Ontario V C } l John E. Betz\ -* S j/ 0 7

October, 1982. W"" ^*S President

Page 13: P.M.E.P. Registration No. OM 82-1-C-l - Ontario

IVIAXIVIIIM IIPORTABLE EM

m F ive frequencies: 222, 444, BBS, 1777 and 3555 Hz.

m Maximum coupled (horizontal-loop) operation with reference cable .

B Minimum coupled operation with reference cable.

U Vertical-loop operation without reference cable.

m Coil separations: 25, 50,100,150, SOO and 25Om C with cable ) or 100,200,300,400,600 and BOO ft.

m Reliable data from depths of up to IBOrn CBDOft).

m B uilt-in voice communication circuitry with cable.

m T ilt meters to control coil orientation.

Page 14: P.M.E.P. Registration No. OM 82-1-C-l - Ontario

SPECIFICATIONS :

Frequencies : BBB, 1777 and 3555H?. R epeatability :

Coil Separations:

Parameters Read:

Modes of Operation: MAX: Transmitter coil plane; and re ceiver coil plane horiponta (Max-coupled; Horizontal-loop model Usea with ro'er. cabie .

M l N: Transmitter coil plane honzon- tal and receiver coil plane ve~- tical (M i ri-coupled moae) Used with reference cable;.

V.L. : Transmitter coii plane verf- cal and receiver coil piano Hori zontal (Vertical-loop m;: ,le 3. Used without reference cable, in paralle 1 lines.

S5, 5O,1OO,15O,2OO S 25O m (MMH) or 1OO, 2OO, 3OO. 4OO.6OOeno BOO ft. (MMHF). Coil separations in VL.mode not re stricted to fixed values .

- In-Pnase and Quadrature compo nents of the secondary field i n MAX end M IN modes.

- Tilt-angle of the total field in VL mode .

- Automatic, direct readout on 9Omm 13.5") edgewise meters, in MAX and MINJ modes No rv.. - ing or compensation necessary

- Tilt, angle and nui' m BOmm edge-.- WIBC meters, in V.L .rnoae-

In-Phase: *2OV. . 11OOV. by push button switch .

Quadrature: *2OV., ilOOV. t)y push

button c;-/, t. C."" .

Tilt' t 7b "/o F, r ; T NulltVLJ: Sensitiv.ty ad ..sit ;i: j c-

by separation switch.

In-Phsse end Quadrature : 0.25 V. to 0.5 '/. ; T ilt : 1 V. .

Readouts :

Scale Ranges :

NOW ALSO 14C QUADRAT U F-, C FULL SCALL.

Readability :

O.25 0x0 to 1"Xo normally, depending on conditions, frequencies and co separation used .

Transmitter Output:- ?22Hz :22DAtmc- *344Hz :- BSBHz :- 1777 Hz :- 3555 Hz :

BDAtmp

3D Atm?

Receiver Batteries : 9V trans '" adio tyf)e batteries-. (*3 Life; approx. 35hrs. continuous P ty ( alkaline- . Q. 5 An ), les;s in co weather

Transmitter B EI tt e r i e s :

Reference Cable

Voice Link :

B Ah Gel-type rechargeabe battery. [Charger supp'iec:).

Liqht weight, g-conductor teflo" cable for minimum friction. Unshie c- ed. Ali reference cables options at extra cost. Please spe;cif, .

Built-in intercom system fo" voice communication between re ceiver and transmitter operator's in MAX and MIN modes, via r*e- forencti cable

Indicator Lights : Built-in signal and reference wa r -~- mg lights to indicate erroneous

Temperature Range: - 4G"C to *BO"C (-4O"F tc

Receiver Weight: 6kg ( 13 Ibs )

Tronsmitter Weight: 13kg (29 l bs.)

Shipping Weight: Typ rn'ly GC'lkg 013151;)?.,). af;if^- rip c;-i nuant.'tios of re'e r-O'"K-; c:atic- Eina t)Otterie;s include;: Shipped in two field/shipping cases .

SDecif'C.fito'^^ fcutTJiEct lo criB^ge without notif'Catc-

APEX PARAMETRICS LIMITED2OO STEELCASE RD. E., MARKHAM, ONT, CANADA, L3R 1G2

Phone: (416) 852-5G75 Cables: APEXPARA TORONTO

Page 15: P.M.E.P. Registration No. OM 82-1-C-l - Ontario

APPENDIX '2

BLUESTACK RESOURCES LIMITED

GEOLOGICAL MAPPING SLATE BAY AREA

RED LAKE MINING DIVISION

SUMMER - FALL 1982

O.M.E.P. Application No. OM 82-1-C-l

INTRODUCTION

The area mapped is located towards the eastern end of the

Red Lake greenstone belt approximately 7 air miles NNW of the town

of Red Lake. Access may be gained most conveniently by boat in

summer and snowmobile in winter. The 10 mile lake journey takes

approximately 20 minutes.

EXPLORATION HISTORY

The earliest work recorded in the Red Lake area was at

Slate Bay in 1897. The North West Ontario Exploration Company sank

a small shaft about 1/3 mile north of the present Luxor claims. The

results were unsatisfactory and the project was abandoned.

The earliest recorded work on the claim area occurred in

1933. A number of trenches were opened on Luxor claims KRL 2206 and

2208. Erratic gold values were encountered in association with

quartz veins and quartz porphyry intrusives. Further work was carried

out and two areas were diamond core drilled in 1937. One "zone" on

KRL 2206 and 2208 was found to contain low gold values. The other

"zone" on KRL 2214 carried potentially significant gold values. The

best intersection was check assayed at 0.6 oz/ton Au over 5 ft. in

a 15 ft. thick unit averaging 0.23. This promising intersection was

not followed up and the project was terminated.

The next phase of exploration took place in 1947 when more

diamond drilling was carried out. The work was centred on the KRL

2214 gold zone. Low values in gold were encountered but the promising

intersection from the 1937 drilling was not followed up. It is not

W-rf J S -S-

Page 16: P.M.E.P. Registration No. OM 82-1-C-l - Ontario

- 2 -

clear from the notes as to why this happened. However since the

thinking of the day assumed quartz porphyry dykes as the host rock

to gold mineralization the potential significance of 0.23 oz/ton over 15 ft. in tuff may have been overlooked.

Further diamond core drilling took place in 1962, 1965 and

1966. The 1962 drilling intersected interesting Ag values. The

best assay recorded ran 4 oz/ton Ag over 5.5 ft. Drilling in 1965

and 1966 was done to test various E.M. anomalies on the block.

Interesting minor mineralization was found.

GEOLOGICAL MAPPING

1. Method

The geological mapping program commenced in July 1982 and

was terminated in October 1982. Using the existing grid and air

photographs for reference the area was mapped on a scale 1:4800. The

grid was also auger/grub hoe sampled at 50 ft. intervals in the "B"

soil horizon. Traverses between the cut lines were also used but

the scrub bush covering much of the property made this unworkable for

most of the area. Features of geomorphological interest were also

noted during the mapping.

2. Lithologies

The area may be sub-divided into three main "field" form

ations. It will be appreciated at this stage that the terms and

sub-division employed are subject to change and refinement as detailed

knowledge of the area increases.

l! -l l!FORMATION "1

This formation comprises the NW part of the claim block

and covers both the silver and gold bearing zones referred to above.

Page 17: P.M.E.P. Registration No. OM 82-1-C-l - Ontario

- 3 -

The succession is a series of intermediate basalts and tuffs. The

units represented appear as relatively massive flows (?) in the

extreme north-west with a transition into waterlain tuffs towards

the south-east. In common with the rest of the area metamorphic

alteration appears to just enter the lower greenschist facies and

many macrofeatures remain recognisable. Differentiation between

fine grained clastic metasediments and tuffs can be difficult in

this area therefore the geological contact should be interpreted

loosely.

Minor (?) granodioritic and quartz feldspar porphyry

intrusives occur at a number of locations in the formation. Rhyolitic units concordant (?) with the strike of the country rock occur in

frequently but appear to be relatively substantial in extent. Blebs

and stringers of carbonate were noted in a number of exposures in

the tuff/basalt lithologies.

An extensive magnetite formation occurs on KRL 2206 and

2208. This was trenched by Bluestack Resources Ltd. personnel in

1981 and indicated the magnetite stratigraphically overlying a garnetiferous, epoditic chloritic alteration "zone". The presence

of angular to sub-angular block of magnetite incorporated in the

alteration zone strongly suggests the presence of a breccia pipe.

A chert formation overlies the magnetite.

The trenching program indicated interesting silver (5 oz/ton

over 5 f t.) and copper values (170 over 5 ft) in the zone. The local

enrichment of carbonate noted in one trench loosely correlates with gold values of up to 0.09 oz/ton (See trenching report 1981).

The area is structurally complex with a number of small

Light folds and a dominant cleavage/shearing direction of approx

imately 060 0 . The minor folds give conflicting evidence but a general

anticlinal regard to the south-east was noted. Dips on bedding

planes tend to be 70 0 to 80 0 N.W. or S.E. Detailed structural

Page 18: P.M.E.P. Registration No. OM 82-1-C-l - Ontario

- 4 -

interpretation will require a considerable amount of stripping and

cleaning of exposure.

FORMATION "2"

This formation comprises the centre of the mapped area. It is characterized by a thick succession of polymictic conglomerates.,

sandstones, shales and minor arkosic and calcareous sediments. The

formation is wedge shaped with the apex pointing towards the NE.

Exposure is good over the hilly conglomeratic units but over much of

the area a varved clay/sand overburden cover makes interpretation

of geologic contacts very speculative. The occurrence of a marble

unit at the N.E. end of this area appears to indicate a facies change from S to N. Cherty iron formation and graphitic shales develop to

the S.E. of ths formation. Minor chalcopyrite and pyrrhotite occur

in the graphitic shales noted on KRL 526078. The contact with

Formation "3" is not clear since a large quartz feldspar porphyry

and a basic gabbroic intrusive has caused complex structural and

stratigraphic changes.

HO IIFORMATION "3

This formation of intermediate/mafic volcanics is poorly

exposed on the south eastern "edge" of the mapped area. The develop ment of pillow and possible pahoehoe textures in intermediate volcan

ics suggests a marginal sub-aerial-submarine environment. A conglom

eratic iron rich unit is found on a submerged reef on KRL 526089

and 526090.

JFW/v V John F. WhittonDecember 1982.

Page 19: P.M.E.P. Registration No. OM 82-1-C-l - Ontario

52N04NW0012 63.4118 DOME TWP

H-%

f

j w

21

wr -

*

*

Page 20: P.M.E.P. Registration No. OM 82-1-C-l - Ontario

5260

71

.

•' 52

609f

f

4936

6 \A

Me

DO

NO

UG

HD

OM

E

TWP

No

te:

Aq

va

lue

s

less

tha

n

2p

pm

n

ot

plo

tte

d

Au valu

es

less

th

an

5

pp

b

not

plo

tted.

Au

an

aly

sis

fo

r sam

ple

s 6

0.0

00

-

60,

29 O

on

ly

ftOTE

'. A

ll C

laim

N

umbe

rs

Hav

e P

refix

K

RL

40

08

00

12 0

01

60

0

FE

ET

BL

UE

ST

AC

K

RE

SO

UR

CE

S

LIM

ITE

D

RE

D

LA

KE

P

RO

JE

CT

TO

WN

SH

IPS

O

f M

e

DO

NO

UG

H

8

DO

ME

, D

IST

, of

PA

TR

ICIA

SO

IL

GE

OC

HE

MIS

TR

Y

SIL

VE

R R

RM

., G

OLD

R

RB

,

DA

TE

!B

Y

±.

DW

G.

NO

.

52N04NW0012 63.4118 DOME TWP

Page 21: P.M.E.P. Registration No. OM 82-1-C-l - Ontario

5/?

S

s^ 5

2609

9

,ft,k

j?

;?/?

;?

t.X.V

't*

c t

tUb

T

Lh

J ;.T

-

f l

*t

526

086

T3!U

LEG

EN

D

>50

ppm

4I

- 5

0

31-4

0

2I -

30

VO

TE:

AU

C

/ai/n

N

umbe

rs

Have

P

refix

K

RL

BLU

ES

TA

CK

R

ES

OU

RC

ES

L

IMIT

ED

RE

D

LA

KE

P

RO

JE

CT

TO

WN

SH

IPS

O

t M

e

DO

NO

UG

H

a

DO

ME

, D

IST

, of

PA

TR

ICIA

SO

IL

GE

OC

HE

MIS

TR

Y

CO

PP

ER

P

PM

.fo

-5, 4

- II

g

52N04NW0012 63.4118 DOME TWP

Page 22: P.M.E.P. Registration No. OM 82-1-C-l - Ontario

2214

-v^u

f ^

^-xJ \

526096

DO

ME

X

TWP

LE

GE

ND

25

ppm

-21-2

5

n

-16-2

0

n

Num

bers

H

ave

Pre

fix

KR

L

BL

UE

ST

AC

K

RE

SO

UR

CE

S

LIM

ITE

D

RE

D

LA

KE

P

RO

JE

CT

TO

WN

SH

IPS

o

f M

e

DO

NO

UG

H

8

DO

ME

, D

IST

, of

PA

TR

ICIA

SO

IL

GE

OC

HE

MIS

TR

Y

LE

AD

R

P.

M.

l lg

52N04NWB012 63.4118 DOME TWP

220

Page 23: P.M.E.P. Registration No. OM 82-1-C-l - Ontario

. ^

^.Q

\*

CL^

c )

.-t ^, ^

•ft

fc ^

UcA

52

^94

(™)

, i

r*\i

Se

•" -'Y

* 4

TV ,*

'^

y*

^*

rf.

^•^

A

* i

^S1V

'- x-

,^

^X-i*

^

^^

^^

T^

^

v^^

T±^

^, X

^

fe\^

•^-'

v;*

w ^

* ^k

i ^

/Cib

4 /^

i ^V

1 ,

O,.

A

*\

-X

^A

f,

^ ^

a.

0.*

-S.,

^-;

fc ^

,

t- ^

\•* ^

9iv

^

s ^?

X '^

^V

^'

X

i1*,

^j?\

^"

^1* ^

o 9k

iv" 3

y\

li1'.

\

^'A,

^\ ^ ^V

^ ^*

1&

\C

^ ^.^ ^ ^

^,

4\ l

J ji

Oyo

T

Tfc

* T

iJ**

, O

.*

^ t

^-M

^,s\

Cla

i --

KyO

0 T

) **

T

) *S

n

*Io

'fV

V

*4

^-

At*

"A1"0

, S

6',,

c&sw

ks ^

tS'\ ^

1 ^\

^'

\v

, ^

g.

^

^'

^fr

^

^.. ^

^

, ^

^y;

^', ^

^ ^ ^

W

-4-^

;V

w.

^t^

*i

^5-\*

0

^**

^

CD,,

^.

vi*

QT*

AJ1,

^A^.

. ^^

;1^^^^^^

D*r

f ^^

Me

DO

NO

tiGH

DO

ME

\. T

W P

LEG

EN

D

201

-300

"

101

- 2

00

"

51 -

10

0 "

NO

TE:

All

Cla

im

Num

bers

H

ave

Pre

fix

K R

I

BLU

ES

TA

CK

R

ES

OU

RC

ES

L

IMIT

ED

RE

D

LA

KE

P

RO

JEC

T

TO

WN

SH

IPS

of

Me

DO

NO

UG

H

a

DO

ME

, D

IST

, of

PA

TR

ICIA

SO

IL

GE

OC

HE

MIS

TRY

ZIN

C

R P.

M. ^

.-i-M

s (3

)52N04NW0012 63.4118 DOME TWP

23

0

Page 24: P.M.E.P. Registration No. OM 82-1-C-l - Ontario

\

5260

94

5Z6I

G4

Q

Me

DO

NO

dGH

DO

ME

X

TWP

5260

89

-r

RE

SO

UR

CE

S

LIM

ITE

D

W:

l 1

K:

^ G

- i

L D

WE

, ^1

3

GE

OC

HE

MIS

TR

Y

BA

SA

L T

ILL

Au5

2N

64

NW

00

I2 S

3.4

11

8

DO

ME

TW

P

Page 25: P.M.E.P. Registration No. OM 82-1-C-l - Ontario

Me

QQ

NQttG

HD

OM

EX

TW

P

*-

* -

. v

.*

-if*

^•*

^ t\*

VV

-''•••N

^^

A*

**?

v

xV^J

- x^*

^'

A ^

*\\

Num

bers

H

ave

Pre

fix

KR

L

BLU

ES

TA

CK

R

ES

OU

RC

ES

L

IMIT

ED

RE

D

LA

KE

P

RO

JEC

T

TO

WN

SH

IPS

o

f M

e D

ON

OU

GH

ft

DO

ME

, D

IST

, o

f P

AT

RIC

IA

GEO

CH

EMIS

TRY

BASA

L T

ILL

Cu p

pm/IO

52N04NW001S 63.4118 DOME TWP

25

0

Page 26: P.M.E.P. Registration No. OM 82-1-C-l - Ontario

Me

DONO

KGH

DO

ME

X

TWP.

" 4

t V

* ii\

,V

V.\

^

^ ^ '^

^

A i

Cia

im

Num

bers

H

ere

Pre

fix

KR

L

fi^U

ES

TA

CK

R

ES

OU

RC

ES

L

IMIT

ED

RE

D

LA

KE

P

RO

JEC

T

at

Me

DQ

NO

UG

H

B

DO

ME

, D

IST

, of

PA

TR

ICIA

GEO

CH

EMIS

TRY

BA

SA

L T

ILL

Zn52

N04

NW

a0t2

6

3.4

11

8

DOM

E TW

P2

6O

Page 27: P.M.E.P. Registration No. OM 82-1-C-l - Ontario

Lin

e 5

6 E

.Li

ne

60

E.

Line

64 E

.

\ K

RL

52

6O

9I.

KR

L

22U

N l

KR

L 526078-

KR

L

526066.

Line

52 E

Line

48 E

-V\

,30s.

\ \

KR

L 5

26O

87.

\ 30s.

KR

L 526082.

Lin

e 4

4E

3Os.

Line

68

ELi

ne

72 E

Line

76 E

•\

Line

80 E

.

Me

Don

agh

Tow

nshi

p.

Dom

e To

wns

hip.

KR

L 5

26

O93

\30s

KR

L

52

6O

89

X

Line

70

E

3Os.

O OL

f

Line

66

o

Line

6

2E

.

LOC

ATI

ON

OF

SA

MP

LED

AR

EA

.

KR

L 526088

O

Line

8.

4 E

KR

L 5

Z6

O9

7

33 s

.

Oo

KR

L 526092.

QO

O

Oo O

o o Oo

o

. 4

Os.

4O

s.

(par

t of)

LEG

END

O

O

O

O

O

BLUE

STAC

K RE

SOUR

CES

LIM

ITED

RED

LAKE

PRO

JECT

Ove

rbur

den

sam

plin

g (M

arlo

w s

yste

m)

KRL

526

08

2,0

85,0

87

,089

,090

,092

VDo

me

Twp.

,Dis

trict

ot

Pat

ricia

. (M

ap l

)

ME

TAL

: Au

p.p.

b.(S

ampl

e ta

ken

at b

edro

ck)

SCAL

E l'1

200

-/-c

-x

J F

W

JUN

E

1982

52N

84N

W00

12

63

.41

18

D

OflE

TW

P270

Page 28: P.M.E.P. Registration No. OM 82-1-C-l - Ontario

Lin

e 5

6 E

Line

60 E

Line

64 E

Line

68 E

Une

7

2 E

Lin

e 76 E

Line

80 E

L.ne

84 E

KR

L

526091.

KR

L 2

21

1-

l

52

60

78

,5

26

08

6

Line

52

E

Line

4

8 E

\

.30s

.

KR

L 52

608

7.

KR

L 526082.

3Os.

o

Lin

e 4

4E

oo

Xo\

\ 3

0s.

\

KR

L 5

26

O8

5

52N04NW0012 63.4118 DOME TWP

2S

O

Me

Don

agh

Tow

nshi

p.K

RL 5

26

09

3

Dom

e To

wns

hip.

30s

KR

L

52

6O

89

Line

7

0E

•A'

30s.

30s

Lm

e66it

.A

Qo

l i n

e *.i

*

Oi ^

Ov;Oo

M)

so o

o3O

sO

x

Oo

30

s

40s.

30s

KR

L 5

26

O9

7

33 s

OOo Q

OV

,4O

s.

40s

40

s.K

RL

52

60

88

o o o

o

LOC

ATI

ON

O

F S

AM

PLE

D A

RE

A

KR

L 5

260

92 o

o.

40

so

'V

Q x

oi"

Q

s O

. 4

Os

GO

LDS.

BAY

(par

t of)

LEG

EN

D

O

O

O

O O

BLU

ESTA

CK

RESO

URCE

S LI

MIT

ED

RED

LAK

E P

RO

JEC

T

Ove

rbur

den

sam

plin

g (M

arlo

w s

yste

m)

KR

L 5

26

08

2,0

85,0

87,0

89

,090

,092

Dom

e Tw

p.,D

istri

ct o

t Pa

trici

a.

(Map

l)

ME

TA

L :

CU

p

.p.m

.X 1

0 .

(Sam

ple

take

n at

bed

rock

)

SC

ALE

h

1200

J.F.

W.

JUN

E

1982

Page 29: P.M.E.P. Registration No. OM 82-1-C-l - Ontario

L.ne

56

E.

Line

64 E

.Li

ne 6

8 E

Line

72 E

Line

76 E

Line

80 E

.Li

ne 8

4 E

\. K

R L

526O

9I

N l

KR

L 5

26

07

8

Line

52 E

Line

48 E

.

KR

L 526082,

, 3

0s,

KR

L

2211.

Line

44

E

. 3

O s

.

Me

Don

agh

Tow

nshi

p.K

RL 5

26

O9

3

KR

L 5

26087-

Dom

e T

owns

hip.

\3Os.

KRL 526O89

40s.

. 40s.

4Os.

4Os

KRL 526O9O,

4Os

4Os

KRL 526097.

KRL 526092

O

o

O

o4Cs.

Oo oo o

O'^•

GO

LDSE

EKER

S BA

Y (p

art o

f)

. 4O

s.

LEG

END

O

O O o o

40s.

4O

s.LO

CA

TIO

N O

F S

AM

PLE

D A

RE

A.

J. -

.

KR

L 52

608

8.

BLU

ESTA

CK

RESO

URCE

S LI

MIT

ED

RED

LAK

E P

RO

JEC

T

Ove

rbur

den

sam

plin

g (M

arlo

w s

yste

m)

KR

L 5

26

08

2,0

85

,08

7,0

89

,09

0,0

92

Dom

e Tw

p.,D

istri

ct o

t P

atric

ia.

(Map

l)

ME

TA

L1

Zn

p

.p.m

./ 1

0.

(Sam

ple

take

n at

bed

rock

)

SCAL

E h

1200

.4 l

J.F.

W.

JUN

E

1982

52N04NWB012 63.4118 DOME TWP

Page 30: P.M.E.P. Registration No. OM 82-1-C-l - Ontario

CO

ND

UC

TO

R

LEG

EN

DMe

QQ

NQUG

HD

OM

EX

TW

PD

epth

in

Con

duct

ance

fee

t in

mho

sN

. S

20

/15

very

sm

all

cond

ucta

nce

zone

-

St

mho

Sm

all

cond

ucta

nce

zone

-

l to

19

mho

s

A

Let

ter

desi

gnat

ion

MM

oder

ate

cond

ucta

nce

zone

-2

0 t

o 99

mho

s

Larg

e co

nduc

tanc

e zo

ne

l i

Con

tinuo

us z

one

Pod

dy

or

patc

hy z

one

Regio

n o

f th

ick

and/o

r co

nduct

ive

ove

rbu

rde

n

Not

e: S

awto

oth

pattern

al

ong

edge

of

cond

uctiv

e zo

ne

indi

cate

s un

defin

ed

edge

du

e to

re

solu

tion

prob

lem

s or

to

in

suffic

ient

data

.

Inst

rum

enta

tion

! M

ax M

in X

L

Sur

veys

by

! W

A.

Bar

clay

E

xplo

ratio

n

Serv

ices

Ltd

.,

1981

.1

982

Inte

rpre

tatio

n

by

John

B

etz

Lim

ited

(R

epo

rts

of

Oct

. 81

d

O

ct. 8

2

&26

079

\

5260

83

\M

OTE

: A

ll C

laim

N

umbe

rs

Have

P

refix

K

RL

BLU

ES

TA

CK

R

ES

OU

RC

ES

LIM

ITE

D

RE

D

LA

KE

P

RO

JEC

T

TO

WN

SH

IPS

o

t M

e D

ON

OU

GH

a

DO

ME

, D

IST

, o

f P

ATR

ICIA

E.M

. CO

ND

UC

TOR

IN

TER

PR

ETA

TIO

N

FRO

M

MA

X

MIN

E

.M.

SU

RV

EY

S

DA

TE :

Dec

., 19

88

52Ne4NW0812

63.4118

DOME TWP

300

Page 31: P.M.E.P. Registration No. OM 82-1-C-l - Ontario

x/"'

//

/\x

540

042

l-"^,

540045

' j 7

s "

(

. ,

.4x

'l

X

///X

7

X

'2303

LEG

EN

D

Me

DO

NO

tlGH

lOO

Ogo

mm

a co

nto

ur

(to 6

50O

Oga

mm

as)

25

0g

am

mo

co

nto

ur

__

_ ~

—50gom

ma

conto

ur

Mag

lo

w

DO

ME

X

TWP

Surv

ey

by

W. A

. B

arc

lay

Exp

lora

tion

S

erv

ice

* Ltd

., F

eb

., 1

982

Conto

urs

In

ked

on

New

Pla

n by

g.

m.e

.s

, N

ov

..1

98

2.

/ 5

26

07

8

f1/

\' f(

l 'li

l \ '

l

iw Nu

mbe

rs

Have

P

refix

K

Ri

-V--

5

2608

8

BLU

ES

TA

CK

R

ES

OU

RC

ES

L

IMIT

ED

RE

D

LA

KE

P

RO

JEC

T

TO

WN

SH

IPS

o

t M

e D

ON

OU

GH

8

DO

ME

, D

IST

, of

PA

TR

ICIA

ISO

M

AG

NE

TIC

C

ON

TOU

RS

Page 32: P.M.E.P. Registration No. OM 82-1-C-l - Ontario

'd?

\ 5

26

10

2

SY

MB

OLS

Sm

all

bedr

ock

outc

rop.

Are

a of

be

droc

k ou

tcro

p

54

00

48

f laB

eddi

ng -

in

clin

ed

.ve

rtic

al.

Bed

ding

top

- i

nclin

ed, v

ert

ical, o

vert

urne

d

Pill

ow

ed

la

va

flow

(sh

owin

g to

p).

Geo

logi

cal

boun

dary

(o

bser

ved)

.

Me!

DO

NOttG

HG

eolo

gica

l bo

unda

ry

(infe

rred

)

DO

ME

X

TWP

Fau

lt (a

ssum

ed).

Min

or

fold

s.

AV

A

ntic

line,

Syn

clin

e.

LEG

END

Met

amor

phos

ed

inte

rmed

iate

to

fel

sic

intr

usiv

e ro

cks

Plu

toni

c ba

thol

itic

phas

esC

last

ic

met

ased

imen

ts

4a

Con

glom

erat

e, p

olym

ictic

4b

Con

glom

erat

e w

ith

volc

anic

cl

asts

4c

Ark

ose,

quart

zose

a

ren

ile4d

W

oeke

-mud

ston

e4e

M

udst

one,

slat

e, a

rgill

ite4

f G

arne

t be

arin

g4g

A

ndal

usite

be

arin

g4h

Car

bona

te

bear

ing

4j

Bio

tite

schi

st,

serici

te-b

iotit

e

schi

st4k

F

uchs

ite-b

earin

g , g

reen

car

bona

te4m

Im

mat

ure

wac

ke

com

pose

d of

vo

lcan

ic

debr

is

AB

BR

EV

IAT

ION

S8

Uns

jDdi

/ided

8a

Por

ph/r

iT.c

mic

rocl

ine

-bio

tite

gro

no

dio

rile

8b

Bio

tiTe-

horn

eble

nde

Iron

dhje

mite

, gr

anod

iorit

e,sy

enod

iorit

e8c

B

iolit

e

l euc

otro

ndh

jem

i t e

, peg

mat

ite, a

plite

Bio

tite-

horn

eble

nde

quar

tz

dio

rite

Hor

nebl

ende

dio

rite

Gab

bro,

am

phib

olite

Qua

rtz m

onzo

nite

, pe

gmat

ite,

aplit

eX

enol

ithic

, sc

hlie

ritic

Pyr

oxen

e-bi

otite

-hor

nebl

ende

qua

rtz

dior

ite g

neis

s

Au

....,

Gol

dAg

......

.....S

ilver

a sp

......

.Ars

enop

yrite

cp...

......

.Cha

lcop

yrite

Cu .

... .

Cop

per

gn...

......

Gal

ena

po.-.

.-.-..

.Pyr

rhot

ite

py...

......

..Pyr

iteqv

......

....Q

uartz

Vei

nsp

....

.....S

phal

erite

8k

Por

phyr

itic

horn

eble

nde

quar

tz

dio

rite

,6a

526082 .

Fels

ic

met

ovol

cani

csIn

trusi

ve

con

tact

3a

Pyr

ocla

stic

br

ecci

a, tuff b

recc

ia (

bx)

3b

Tu

ff,

lap

illi tu

ff,

lapill

isto

ne

3c

Gar

net

3d

Fu

chsi

te-b

ea

rin

g

gree

n ca

rbon

ate

Hyp

abys

sal

phas

es

7a

Tro

ndhj

emite

, quart

z po

rphr

y7b

Fe

ldsp

ar p

orph

ry,

quar

tz f

elds

par

porp

hry,

fels

ite7c

B

iotit

e gr

anod

iorit

eIn

term

edia

te

met

avol

cani

cs

intr

usiv

e

cont

act

2a

Lapilh

-tuff,

tuff,

lapill

isto

ne

2b

Tuf

f b

recc

iatb

xjjo

pill

isto

ne

,pyr

ocl

ast

ic

brec

cia(

bx)

2c

Flow

, m

assi

ve

lo f

olia

ted

2d

Ma

gn

etit

e-q

ua

rtz-

chlo

rite

flo

w2e

H

orne

blen

de

schi

st,

bio

tite-h

orn

ble

nde

schi

st2

f H

orne

blen

de

schi

st,

bio

tite

horn

blen

de

schis

t-m

igm

atit

e2g

B

iotit

e sc

hist

, se

rici

te -

bio

tite

schi

st -

mig

ma

tite

2h

And

alus

ite -

bea

ring

2 j

Fuch

site

-bearing,

gree

n ca

rbon

ate

2k

Gar

net-

bear

ing

Met

amor

phos

ed

maf

ic

to

ultr

amaf

ic

intru

sive

ro

cks

6a

Gab

bro,

leu

coga

bbro

, dio

rite

6b

Peridotit

e ,

serp

ente

nite

pyr

oxe

nite

6c

Lam

prop

hyre

NO

TE:

AU

C/

a/m

Nu

mbe

rs

Have

P

refix

K

RL

Intr

usi

ve

con

tact

Met

ovol

cani

cs

and

met

ased

imen

tsM

afic

m

etov

olca

nics

Che

mic

al

met

ased

imen

tsa

Mas

sive

to

fo

liate

d

flow

, fin

e gr

aine

d b

Pill

owed

flo

w,

pill

ow

bre

ccia

Variolit

ic

flow

Coa

rse-

grai

ned

flow

(g

abbro

ic)

Ra

dia

ting

, al

igne

d am

phib

ole

-ri e

h flo

wA

myg

da

loid

al

flow

Po

rph

yriti

c flo

wT

uff

Gar

net

bear

ing

BLU

ES

TAC

K

RE

SO

UR

CE

S

LIM

ITE

D5a

C

hert

5b

Fer

rugi

nous

ch

ert

, Iro

n fo

rmat

ion

5c

Magnetit

e

bear

ing

5d

Pyr

rhot

ite,

pyrit

e be

arin

g5e

G

raph

ite

bear

ing

5f

Mar

ble,

co

le-

silic

ate

RE

D

LA

KE

P

RO

JEC

T

TO

WN

SH

IPS

ot

Me

DO

NO

UG

H

S

DO

ME

, D

IST

, of

PA

TR

ICIA

GEO

LOG

YL

ege

nd

ba

sed

on

curr

en

t G

.S.C

. a

nd

O

.D.M

. public

atio

ns.

D AT

E: J

an.

1983

BY: j

.F.w

.52N04NWeei2

63.4118 DOME

TWP

32

0

Page 33: P.M.E.P. Registration No. OM 82-1-C-l - Ontario

62

-r

52

61

02

6 T/ P

37-

3

LEG

END

Hole

s D

rille

d m

1937

o

" 19

47

o

11 19

62

o

" 19

65

o

1966

o

: A

ll C

laim

Nu

mbe

rs

Have

P

refix

KR

L

BLU

ES

TA

CK

R

ES

OU

RC

ES

L

IMIT

ED

RE

D

LA

KE

P

RO

JEC

T

TO

WN

SH

IPS

o

f M

e O

ON

OU

GH

8

D

OM

E,

DIS

T,

of

PA

TR

ICIA

Drillh

ole

Loca

tions

52N04N#0eia

63.4116

DOME TWP

33

0