plumbing the depths of the pelican field - devex conference · plumbing the depths of the pelican...
TRANSCRIPT
Plumbing the Depths of the Pelican FieldThurza Frenz
Pelican
Talk Objectives
• To discuss the development of the northern area of thePelican Field, in particular:
• The relationship between reservoir quality, facies anddepth and how this impacted the most recent wellplacement in the northern area
• The early performance of the PUP22S1/PUW23S1producer/injector pair and some interestingobservations about how these wells interact
May 18th 2016 DEVEX 2
The Pelican Field: Introduction
DEVEX 3
Location: East Shetland Basin, NNS
Discovered: 1975 (211/26-4)
Type: Subsea oil development tied back tothe Cormorant Alpha Platform
STOIIPs and Recovery:TOTAL: 486 MMstbRecovery to date: 74 MMstb (15 % RF)
PELICAN MAIN: 369 MMstbRecovery to date: 71 MMstb (19 % RF)
PELICAN NORTH: 116 MMstbRecovery to date: 3.31 MMstb (3 % RF)
Depth: 10,500 - 12,300 ft TVDSS
Contact: OWC not penetrated, estimatedat 12,300 ft
The Pelican Field: Introduction
DEVEX 4
Location: East Shetland Basin, NNS
Discovered: 1975 (211/26-4)
Type: Subsea oil development tied back tothe Cormorant Alpha Platform
STOIIPs and Recovery:TOTAL: 486 MMstbRecovery to date: 74 MMstb (15 % RF)
PELICAN MAIN: 369 MMstbRecovery to date: 71 MMstb (19 % RF)
PELICAN NORTH: 116 MMstbRecovery to date: 3.31 MMstb (3 % RF)
Depth: 10,500 - 12,300 ft TVDSS
Contact: OWC not penetrated, estimatedat 12,300 ft
The Pelican Field: Reservoir in a Typical Well
• Middle Jurassic Brent Group
• Field average: 350 ft thick
• Crestal erosion of Tarbert and Upper Ness
• Well shows reduction of reservoir quality withdepth
• Results in top-heavy distribution of permeabilitythroughout the Brent
• Best quality reservoir in Upper Ness sands
• Leads to water cycling through Upper Nessinterval - potential bypass of Lower Brentreserves
• 65 % of field STOIIP is within Lower Brent
May 18th 2016
Up
pe
r N
ess
Low
er
Ne
ssEt
ive
Ran
no
chB
roo
m
ZONE GR TVDSS PHIE PERM
Up
pe
r B
ren
tLo
we
r B
ren
t
211/26a-12RE
0.01 5000 0.00 0.30
Pelican North
• Appraisal wells CA23S1 & CA23S2 drilledinto head area of the Pelican Field in 1998
• Found 350 ft thick Brent interval
• Significantly less sand in Upper and LowerNess
• Etive - tight, low resistivity sands
• Broom - water bearing
• CA23S2 perforated but failed to producedue to low Productivity Index
• In 2013 TAQA drilled first successfulproducer into the North - PUP22S1
DEVEX
Pelican North
• Appraisal wells CA23S1 & CA23S2 drilledinto head area of the Pelican Field in 1998
• Found 350 ft thick Brent interval
• Significantly less sand in Upper and LowerNess
• Etive - tight, low resistivity sands
• Broom - water bearing
• CA23S2 perforated but failed to producedue to low Productivity Index
• In 2013 TAQA drilled first successfulproducer into the North - PUP22S1
DEVEX 7
Up
pe
r N
ess
Low
er
Ne
ssEt
ive
Ran
no
chB
roo
m
ZONE GR TVDSS PHIE PERM
Up
pe
r B
ren
tLo
we
r B
ren
t
CA23S1
0.01 5000 0.00 0.30
Pelican North
• Appraisal wells CA23S1 & CA23S2 drilledinto head area of the Pelican Field in 1998
• Found 350 ft thick Brent interval
• Significantly less sand in Upper and LowerNess
• Etive - tight, low resistivity sands
• Broom - water bearing
• CA23S2 perforated but failed to producedue to low Productivity Index
• In 2013 TAQA drilled first successfulproducer into the North - PUP22S1
DEVEX
Pelican North: PUP22S1 Well Results
• Encountered 350 ft thick Brent sequence at11,350 ft TVDSS
• Excellent reservoir properties in both Upperand Lower Ness intervals
• Significant drop-off in permeability belowLower Ness
• Reservoir more similar to flank NW Hutton Fieldthan Pelican Main - presence of Etive Interfluve
DEVEX 9
Up
per
Ne
ssL.
Nes
sEt
ive
Ran
no
chB
roo
m
GR TVDSS PHIE PERM
Up
per
Bre
nt
Low
er
Bre
nt
PUP22S1ZONE
0.01 5000 0.00 0.30
Pelican North: PUP22S1 Well Results
DEVEX
• Significant erosion of the Etive took place prior toLower Ness deposition
• Erosion created an irregular incised valley topographyonto which the Lower Ness was deposited
• Thick Etive encountered at PUP22S1 is located in aninterfluve position where less erosion took place thanthe main field and nearby NW Hutton
Adapted from Marriott, 2015
Pelican North: PUP22S1 Well Results
• Encountered 350 ft thick Brent sequence at11,350 ft TVDSS
• Excellent reservoir properties in both Upperand Lower Ness intervals
• Significant drop-off in permeability belowLower Ness
• Reservoir more similar to flank NW Hutton Fieldthan Pelican Main - presence of Etive Interfluve
• Pressure tests showed northern area to be atvirgin pressure
• Produced 3.31 MMstb since August 2013 (toFebruary 2015)
• Injector needed to maximise recovery andmaintain pressures for future drilling
DEVEX 11
Up
per
Ne
ssL.
Nes
sEt
ive
Ran
no
chB
roo
m
GR TVDSS PHIE PERM
Up
per
Bre
nt
Low
er
Bre
nt
PUP22S1ZONE
0.01 5000 0.00 0.30
The Significance of Facies
• Reservoir quality is severely affectedby depth
• PUP22S1 results prompted re-look atreservoir degradation with depth
• Use of analogue data from NWHutton Field was key
• Core data from both fields re-assessed
• Key link found between facies (grainsize) and reservoir quality
May 18th 2016 DEVEX 12
Etive Shoreface Sandstones
Upper Ness Fluvial Channels
Adapted from Marriott & Besley, 2015
Facies & Depth
• Coarse grained fluvial channels retainbest reservoir properties at depth
• Found exclusively within Ness interval
• Net reservoir preserved at depths inexcess of 12,500 ft TVDSS
• Finer grained facies such asmudstones and lower shoreface showthe most degradation with depth
• Become non-net below a depth of11,800 ft TVDSS
• Primarily affects permeability butslight degradation of porosity alsoseen
May 18th 2016 DEVEX 13
Upper Ness Fluvial Channels
Etive Shoreface Sandstones
PU
P2
2S1
Adapted from Marriott & Besley, 2015
The Pelican Field: Well Depth Comparison
May 18th 2016 DEVEX Cored Wells
De
pth
(TV
DSS
ft)
PU
W2
3S1
PUW23S1: Key Risks & Uncertainties
Facies
• Presence and quantity of good qualityfluvial channel facies
• Presence of Etive Interfluve
Connectivity
• Sealing/ baffling faults between injectorand producer
Pressure
• Potentially large pressure differentialacross Mid Ness Shale due to productionat PUP22S1 leading to drillability issues
DEVEX 15
PUW23S1: Pre-Drill Pore Pressure Prediction
• Pre drill estimates of depletion ~ 4400psi in Upper Ness with virgin pressurein Lower Brent units
• No safe mud window
• Mud Weight > Fracture Gradient inUpper Ness
• Borehole strengthening material used
• Estimated additional strength of 400 psi
• No losses during drilling of reservoirsection
• 4000 psi depletion measured in UpperNess
DEVEX
PUW23S1 PPFG Prognosis
PUW23S1: Pre-Drill Pore Pressure Prediction
• Pre drill estimates of depletion ~ 4400psi in Upper Ness with virgin pressurein Lower Brent units
• No safe mud window
• Mud Weight > Fracture Gradient inUpper Ness
• Borehole strengthening material used
• Estimated additional strength of 400 psi
• No losses during drilling of reservoirsection
• 4000 psi depletion measured in UpperNess
DEVEX
PUW23S1 PPFG Prognosis
Addition of Wellbore Strengthening
Material
PUW23S1: Results
• Encountered top reservoir at 11,797 ftTVDSS
• ‘Top heavy’ reservoir qualitydistribution
• Good quality Upper and Lower Nessinterval with good permeabilities
• Poor quality Lower Brent similar tothat seen at PUP22S1
• Etive Interfluve encountered as atPUP22S1
May 18th 2016 DEVEX 18
Up
per
Ne
ssL.
Ne
ssEt
ive
Ran
no
ch
GR TVDSS PHIE PERM
Up
per
Bre
nt
Low
er
Bre
nt
PUW23S1ZONE
Bro
om
0.01 5000 0.00 0.30
PUW23S1: Results
• Electro-facies show some good qualityFluvial Channel facies (yellow) withinthe Upper Ness
• Pressures taken throughout the UpperNess show depletion of 4,000 psi -consistent with predicted pressures
• Shows good communication withPUP22S1 producer
• Unable to get pressures throughoutLower Brent due to very low mobility
May 18th 2016 DEVEX 19
Up
per
Ne
ssL.
Ne
ssEt
ive
Ran
no
ch
GR TVDSS PHIE PERM
Low
er
Bre
nt
PUW23S1ZONE
Bro
om
0.01 5000 0.00 0.30
PUW23S1: Results
May 18th 2016
• Facies, in particular grain size, plays asignificant role in preserving reservoirquality at depth
• Coarse grained fluvial channelspreserve much better permeabilitiesthan the finer grained sands at thesame depth
• Fluvial channels approx. 60 mD
• Finer grained sands approx. 2 mD
Upper Ness Fluvial Channels
Etive Shoreface Sandstones
PU
W2
3S1
Adapted from Marriott & Besley, 2015
PUW23S1: Early Injection Performance
May 18th 2016
• Fractured injection of>10,000 bpd
• Oil benefit >1,000 bopd
• Water breakthrough after 3months
• Oil rates stabilised aboveprevious declining trend
PUP22S1 & PUW23S1 Pressures13 psi/day BHP
increase 3.0 MMbbls
STOIIP
Very rapid response between PUW23S1
and PUP22S1
3.0 psi/day BHP increase 40 MMbbls
STOIIP
Unexplained drop in
PUP22S1 BHP
Pelican Field Oil Production
Sep/2015 Dec/2015 April/2015
Observations
May 18th 2016 DEVEX 22
• Depositional facies plays an important role in preserving reservoir quality atdepth:
• Diagenesis strongly influenced by original grain size
• Coarse grained fluvial channel facies retain good reservoir quality below 12,500 ft
• Increased confidence and opportunities available to Pelican development at depth
• North of Pelican still challenged due to structure and distance from manifold
• Coarse grained fluvial channel facies presence far less certain than main field
• Assessment of reservoir drilling risks was robust and use of wellborestrengthening material allowed drilling risk to be mitigated
• Injectivity shows excellent connection between producer/injector pair withuplift in production justifying injector well
Acknowledgements
May 18th 2016 DEVEX 23
• Derek Littlejohn
• Andrew Bostock
PUW23S1: Injection Related Hydraulic Fracturing
• Hydraulic fracturing took longer than expected based on experience from PUW12S3 injector:
• Investigation underway to compare injection and understand differences:
• Wellbore strengthening material increasing near field stresses
• Well angle, length and orientation in relation to stress field orientation and injection water cooling
• Uncertainty in rock properties in relation to elastic and thermal properties
• Sand exposure and distribution relating to restriction of fracture growth vertically
PUW23S1 Injection - Temperature and Pressure Effects on Fracture Breakdown Pressure – Expected scenario
Heather Caprock
Upper Ness Sands
SAN
DFA
CE
INJE
CTI
ON
PR
ESSU
RE
Top Brent
Top Heather
PUW23S1 Injection - Temperature and Pressure Effects on Fracture Breakdown Pressure – Possible problematic case
Heather Caprock
Upper Ness Sands
SAN
DFA
CE
INJE
CTI
ON
PR
ESSU
RE
Top Brent
Top Heather
Relationship of diagenetic style to depositional environment
Besley, 2015
Upper Ness - Grain Size & Diagenesis
• The Upper Ness high energy fluvial channelsandstones are typically medium grainedand well sorted with little detrital clay
• The pore system is “open”
• Feldspar has suffered grain dissolution butfluid flushing is thought to have preventedthe formation of, or removed, diagenetickaolinite
• Quartz overgrowths form rigid bridgesbetween grains that help resist compaction Feldspar grain
dissolution pore
Blue stain = porosity
1000 μm
200 μm
Marriott, 2015
Etive- Grain Size & Diagenesis
• The Etive shoreface sandstones are finergrained with locally abundant detrital claymatrix and smaller pore throats
• The pore system is “closed”
• Feldspar grain dissolution results indiagenetic kaolinite blocking pores
• Illitisation of kaolinite and detrital clays
• Quartz overgrowth development isinhibited where detrital clay matrix coatsthe grains. Where present this tends toocclude pore throats rather thanpreserving an open pore system
Detrital & authigenicclays block
pores
1000 μm
200 μm
Marriott, 2015