plenary1 cap kees westrate port of rotterdam

5
1 Port of Rotterdam Minimising dwell times Port Development and Logistics Jakarta October 10th, 2011 By: Capt. Kees. J. Weststrate Sr. Project Manager Port of Rotterdam International 2 Private business Port of Rotterdam Investment responsibility in Rotterdam 3 Top 20 World ports, 2010 Unit: Gross weight x 1 million metric tons - *) Ports combined in 2006 1) Including river trade – 2) Freight tons (= 0,920 metric tons) – 3) Short ton (= 0,907 metric tons) Validity of comparison is limited due to differences in definitions 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 S h an g h a i 1 ) N in g bo &Z h ou s h a n *) Si n ga p o re 2 ) Rott e rdam Ti a njin Guangzhou Qin g dao Dalian Hong K ong 1) Bu s a n 2) Qi nh u a n gd a o S o ut h L o uisia n a H o us to n Sh e nzhen Rizhao Los An gele s Nagoya 2) Port Hedland An twe rp Ch i ba 4 European ports, 2010 Unit: x 1 million tons (m) 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 R ot t e rdam ( NL ) A n twerp ( B E) H a m b urg (DE) Marseilles (FR) Amsterdam (NL) Novossiysk ( R U) Le H avre (FR ) Primors k (RU) A l g ecir a s (ES ) B r em en ( D E ) C on st a n t z a( R O ) St. P et er s bu r g ( RU ) Va l e n ci a ( E S) D un kir k( F R ) Ge n oa (IT ) L o ndon (GB) B a rcelona(ES) Ze e brug g e (BE) Wilhe m shaven (DE) Zeeland Seaports (NL) Ghent (BE )

Upload: the-netherlands-embassy-in-jakarta

Post on 26-May-2015

169 views

Category:

Business


3 download

DESCRIPTION

Plenary Session - Port Efficiency Mr Capt Kees Weststrate

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Plenary1 cap kees westrate port of rotterdam

1

Port of RotterdamMinimising dwell timesPort Development and LogisticsJakarta October 10th, 2011

By: Capt. Kees. J. WeststrateSr. Project ManagerPort of Rotterdam International

2

Private business

Port of Rotterdam

Investment responsibility in Rotterdam

3

Top 20 World ports, 2010

Unit: Gross weight x 1 million metric tons - *) Ports combined in 2006

1) Including river trade – 2) Freight tons (= 0,920 metric tons) – 3) Short ton (= 0,907 metric tons)

Validity of comparison is limited due to differences in definitions

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

Shanghai 1)

Ningbo&

Zhoushan*)

Singapore2)

Rotterdam

Tianjin

Guangzhou

Qingdao

Dalian

Hong

Kong

1)

Busan

2)

Qinhuangdao

SouthLouisian

a

Houston

Shenzhen

Rizhao

LosAngeles

Nagoya

2)

Port Hedland

Antw

erp

Chiba

4

European ports, 2010

Unit: x 1 million tons (m)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

Rotterdam(NL)

Antwerp(B

E)

Hamburg

(DE)

Marseilles

(FR)

Amsterdam

(NL)

Novossiysk(RU

)

LeHavre

(FR)

Primorsk

(RU)

Algeciras(ES)

Bremen

(DE)

Constantza(RO

)

St. Petersburg(R

U)

Valencia(ES)

Dunkirk(FR

)

Genoa

(IT)

London(G

B)

Barcelona(ES)

Zeebrugge(BE)

Wilhem

shaven(DE)

ZeelandSeaports

(NL)

Ghent (BE

)

Page 2: Plenary1 cap kees westrate port of rotterdam

2

5

Segmentsfigures 2010

23.3%

25.4%

26.1%

5.5%

17.7%

Crude oil

Mineral oil products &

Dry bulk

Containers

Breakbulk

other liquid bulk

6

Nautically unsurpassable!

12.500 TEUDraft 15,50 m

8.000 TEUDraft 14,50 m

4.800 TEUDraft 13,50 m

Rotterdam can handle any vesselfully loaden at any time.Now and in the future

Antwerp 12,50 m

Hamburg 12,80 m

Rotterdam > 16 m

Amsterdam 13,70 m

7

Nautical order, safety and security

Traffic management, enforcement of Port Bye-laws,prevention and incident response

8

Nautical accessibility

Directly on the North Sea,with 24/7 unrestrictedaccess

Unparalleled turnaroundtimes

Port Sailing timepilot to berth

Rotterdam Maasvlakte 2 hours

Hamburg 12 hours

Antwerp 12 hours

Key characteristics

3

Page 3: Plenary1 cap kees westrate port of rotterdam

3

9

po

rto

fro

tterd

am

.co

m

RadioDirectionFinder

Schouwen

Maasvlakte

Wassenaar

index 10

Radar + radio communication (VHF)

index

12

Page 4: Plenary1 cap kees westrate port of rotterdam

4

13 14

15

State-of-the-art Port Community System

What?

A neutral and reliable information hub for all logisticalinformation in the port

Why?

To align, improve and simplify the exchange of information

Advantages

Simple and efficient information exchange

Optimized logistical processes

Cost reduction

Key characteristics

3

More info at: www.portbase.com16

with Portbasewith Portbasewithout Portbasewithout Portbase

State-of-the-art Port Community System

Key characteristics

3

More info at: www.portbase.com

Page 5: Plenary1 cap kees westrate port of rotterdam

5

17

Pro-active and innovativecustoms organisation

Paperless / E-customs

Control system is basis of analysis

Working in partnership with private sector

Tailor made solutions

24/7 operations

“Single Window” concept

Non-intrusive (i.e.scanning) inspections

Cost & time efficient

“Most efficient customsoffice in the world.”

(Source: World Bank Report2007)

Key characteristics

3

18

Landlord in hinterland

Landlord position for ILT development most likely

Thank you for yourattentionAny questions?