plate 1 surface-fault-rupture-hazard map for the …r 15 w r 14 w r 14 w r 13 w t 41 s t 40 s t 42 s...

1
08 09 06 10 18 19 19 30 07 18 08 04 05 03 30 13 11 14 15 31 22 30 18 19 05 09 11 11 11 30 19 16 18 25 07 07 12 13 12 06 01 01 02 09 04 15 10 14 27 22 15 24 24 26 10 13 26 03 12 21 29 22 12 15 25 23 22 27 01 23 13 23 12 20 12 10 13 24 24 29 24 25 36 13 36 13 14 09 25 29 14 21 28 20 08 03 28 13 28 21 17 21 17 24 36 24 23 29 22 09 25 20 16 02 16 14 09 04 21 28 16 21 17 16 15 07 36 08 33 32 23 10 31 31 36 35 35 34 34 36 32 33 33 32 36 34 33 32 26 06 06 31 30 18 19 27 07 18 31 11 30 19 11 25 11 31 18 19 11 17 11 11 02 06 35 11 26 31 30 11 31 22 06 07 18 05 06 30 19 07 30 18 09 19 18 31 06 04 18 07 30 19 03 20 07 01 10 36 08 01 07 34 19 31 17 15 04 06 05 03 24 29 05 03 27 24 24 17 13 14 08 03 12 12 05 26 22 23 30 22 25 14 12 16 13 13 28 13 25 12 10 21 05 02 36 01 23 10 26 01 26 02 10 03 04 23 35 15 15 34 10 32 22 01 14 03 10 01 35 36 12 33 26 21 27 15 35 27 24 20 22 33 34 24 15 04 20 10 22 13 32 16 25 28 22 23 17 04 23 25 20 08 08 29 17 09 36 27 24 27 24 02 25 09 17 16 13 32 34 21 01 09 36 33 12 29 12 08 25 28 33 27 21 20 29 27 28 32 05 12 14 27 16 28 15 34 29 34 24 26 35 32 28 26 35 26 32 21 25 26 25 05 23 20 29 28 35 20 35 14 23 34 29 16 33 33 36 27 09 36 20 16 32 28 34 35 22 17 33 23 14 28 02 21 26 03 33 16 09 01 34 14 04 06 15 04 02 27 02 08 01 02 21 17 31 32 33 36 34 35 35 Quail r e v i R n i g r i V a t n a S a r a l C r e v i R n i g r i V t r o F e c r a e P h s a W Bloomington Bloomington Hills South . d R s d l e i F n o t g n i h s a W Telegraph St. w o n S y a w k r a P n o y n a C t s a E 0 0 2 ® q SURFACE-FAULT-RUPTURE-HAZARD MAP FOR THE ST. GEORGE–HURRICANE METROPOLITAN AREA Basemap consists of National Agricultural Imagery Program natural color aerial photography. Universal Transverse Mercator Projection, zone 12. North American Datum 1983. Old US-91 Bloomington Hills North Little Valley § ¨ ¦ 15 § ¨ ¦ 15 § ¨ ¦ 15 § ¨ ¦ 15 Middleton . d R r e v i R Sun River St. George Blvd. . t S f f u l B r e v i R EXPLANATION Green Valley Sunbrook ! ( 8 ! ( 18 37 N 113 15' W ! ( 18 e i x i D . r D t n i u q a n o T . r D . r D Bloomington Man O War Rd. . d R m a h g i r B § ¨ ¦ 15 r e v i R . d R n i g r i V r e v i R Stone Cliff Knolls Ledges Diamond Valley Riverside . r D 0 5 4 1 1580 South Washington Fields t s a E 0 0 7 4 h t u o S § ¨ ¦ 15 ! ( 9 Creek Reservoir Sand Hollow Reservoir ! ( 9 ! ( 59 ! ( 9 ! ( 17 R 16 W R 15 W R 17 W R 16 W T 42 S T 43 S 113 22' 30" W 113 30' W 113 37' 30" W R 15 W R 14 W T 42 S T 41 S T 41 S T 40 S R 14 W R 13 W R 13 W R 12 W 37 7' 30" N 37 15' N R 17 W R 16 W R 16 W R 15 W R 15 W R 14 W R 14 W R 13 W T 41 S T 40 S T 42 S T 41 S T 42 S T 43 S 37 15' N 37 7' 30" N 37 N 113 22' 30" W 113 30' W 113 37' 30" W 2008 DISCUSSION USING THIS MAP MAP LIMITATIONS SYMBOLS Municipality boundary Interstate Highway State Highway Major local surface street Other road t r o F e c r a e P h s a W 1 0 1 2 0.5 Miles 1 0 1 2 0.5 Kilometers Scale 1:24,000 Approximate mean declination, 2007 14 o H T R O N E U R T H T R O N C I T E N G A M UTAH Map Location D E R S N I A T N U O M w o n S n o y n a C Santa Clara Heights d n a S w o l l o H h s a W H T U O S S L L I H t s e W k c a l B e g d i R l l i H b b e W s l l i H y t i C e c i r P n o t e l d d i M k c a l B e g d i R b o n i h S e b i K e m o D n o t g n i h s a W R E N R A W E G D I R R E N R A W Y E L L A V D N A S N I A T N U O M n o t g n i h s a W k c a l B e g d i R l l i M k e e r C e m o D g r u b s i r r a H k e e r C d o o w n o t t o C l i a u Q k e e r C s d e e L k e e r C e n i v e p a r G h s a W h s A k e e r C S F F I L C E N A C I R R U H n i k r e V a L k e e r C n i g r i V r e v i R E N A C I R R U H S F F I L C d l u o G h s a W e l l i v n i k t A h s a W E N A C I R R U H S F F I L C N I A T N U O M K E E R C E L T T I L An earthquake is the abrupt rapid shaking of the ground caused by sudden slippage of rocks deep beneath the Earth surface. Earthquakes occur without warning and can cause great injury and death, major economic loss, and social disruption. The surface along which the rocks slip is called a fault. Several faults in the St. George – Hurricane metropolitan area are capable of producing earthquakes. Among the potential effects of large earthquakes is surface faulting, which occurs when movement at depth on a fault during an earthquake propagates to the surface. The resulting displacement at the ground surface produces ground cracking and typically one or more “fault scarps.” Depending on the size of the earthquake, fault scarps can range from a few inches to many feet high and extend for many miles along the fault trace. Local ground tilting and graben formation by secondary faulting may accompany surface faulting, resulting in a zone of deformation along the fault trace that can be tens to hundreds of feet wide. Surface faulting, while of limited aerial extent when compared to other earthquake-related hazards such as ground shaking, can have serious consequences for structures or other facilities that lie along or cross the rupture path. For additional information about surface faulting and other earthquake-related hazards in the St. George – Hurricane metropolitan area, refer to the Earthquake-Hazards and Earthquake-Ground-Shaking Hazard text documents in this report. Because surface faulting is typically confined to relatively narrow zones along the surface trace of a fault, early recognition and avoidance is the most effective strategy for mitigating this hazard. Once the activity class of the fault is determined, we recommend that facilities be set back from the fault trace and any associated zone of deformation in accordance with the UGS guidelines (Christenson and others, 2003). In the absence of practical design techniques for mitigating surface faulting, carefully locating all potentially active fault traces on a site, assessing their level of activity and amount of displacement, and establishing an appropriate setback distance from the fault remain the most reliable procedures for mitigating damage and injury due to surface faulting. In Utah, earthquake-resistant design requirements are specified in the seismic provisions of the International Building Code (International Code Council, 2006a) and International Residential Code (International Code Council, 2006b), which are adopted statewide. IBC Section 1802.2.7 requires that an investigation be conducted for all structures in Seismic Design Categories C, D, E, or F (see Earthquake-Ground-Shaking-Hazard text document) to evaluate the potential for surface rupture due to faulting. Buried or approximately located Holocene or suspected Holocene fault: surface-fault-rupture-hazard studies recommended for all structures intended for human occupancy and all critical facilities. Well-defined Holocene (movement within the past 10,000 years) or suspected Holocene fault: surface-fault-rupture-hazard studies recommended for all structures intended for human occupancy and all critical facilities . PLATE 1 by William R. Lund, Tyler R. Knudsen, Garrett S. Vice, and Lucas M. Shaw Well-defined late Quaternary (movement within the past 130,000 years) fault: surface-fault-rupture-hazard studies recommended for all critical facilities. Studies for other structures for human occupancy remain prudent, but should be based on an assessment of whether risk-reduction measures are justified by weighing the probability of occurence against the risk to lives and potential economic loss. Well-defined Quaternary (movement within the past 1,800,000 years) fault: surface-fault-rupture-hazard studies recommended for all critical facilities. Studies for other structures intended for human occupancy are optional because of the low likelihood of surface faulting, although surface rupture along the fault is still possible. Buried or approximately located Quaternary (movement within the past 1,800,000 years) fault: surface-fault-rupture-hazard studies recommended for all critical facilities. Studies for other structures intended for human occupancy are optional because of the low likelihood of surface faulting, although surface rupture along the fault is still possible. Well-defined fault with unknown activity level: paleoseismic data are lacking, recommend treating as a Holocene fault until proven otherwise. Buried or approximately located fault with unknown activity level: paleoseismic data are lacking, recommend treating as a Holocene fault until proven otherwise. 1 Surface-fault-rupture-hazard special-study area. The special-study areas established for well-defined faults extend for 500 feet on the downthrown side and 250 feet on the upthrown side of each fault. Because their location is uncertain, the special-study areas around buried or approximately located faults are broader, extending 1000 feet on each side of the suspected trace of the faults. HAZARD REDUCTION The Surface-Fault-Rupture-Hazard Map is based on 1:24,000-scale geologic mapping. We believe that the inventory of potentially active faults obtained from that mapping and shown on the map is complete or nearly so at that scale. However, some smaller faults may not have been detected during the mapping or are concealed beneath young geologic deposits. Additionally, buried and approximately located faults by definition lack a clearly identifiable surface trace, and therefore their location is imperfectly known. Site-specific fault-trenching studies should be preceded by a careful field evaluation of the site to identify the surface trace of the fault, other faults not evident at 1:24,000-scale, or other fault-related features at a site-specific scale prior to trenching. Fault - see Explanation for description of color codes; ball and bar on downthrown side of fault. E G R O E G T S T L U A F N O T G N I H S A W T L U A F N O T G N I H S A W T L U A F WASHINGTON HOLLOW FAULT R E N R A W Y E L L A V T L U A F E N A C I R R U H T L U A F E N A C I R R U H T L U A F E N A C I R R U H T L U A F ® q Proposed Airport 1 Critical facilities are Occupancy Category III and IV structures as defined in the International Building Code (IBC, table 1604.5, p. 281; International Code Council, 2006a), and include schools, hospitals, fire stations, high occupancy buildings, water-treatment facilities, and facilities containing hazardous materials. Buried or approximately located late Quaternary (movement within the past 130,000 years) fault: surface-fault-rupture-hazard studies recommended for all critical facilities. Studies for other structures for human occupancy remain prudent, but should be based on an assessment of whether risk-reduction measures are justified by weighing the probability of occurence against the risk to lives and potential economic loss. Although this product represents the work of professional scientists, the Utah Department of Natural Resources, Utah Geological Survey, makes no warranty, expressed or implied, regarding its suitability for a particular use. The Utah Department of Natural Resources, Utah Geological Survey, shall not be liable under any circumstances for any direct, indirect, special, incidental, or consequential damages with respect to claims by users of this product. For use at 1:24,000 scale only. The Utah Geological Survey does not guarantee accuracy or completeness of data. The Surface-Fault-Rupture-Hazard Map shows potentially active faults along which surface faulting may occur. A special-study area is shown around each fault, within which the UGS recommends that a site-specific, surface-fault-rupture-hazard study be performed prior to construction. These studies can resolve uncertainties inherent in generalized hazard mapping and help ensure safety by identifying the need for fault setbacks. Utah Geological Survey Guidelines for Evaluating Surface-Fault-Rupture Hazards in Utah (Christenson and others, 2003) include a detailed rationale for performing surface-fault- rupture-hazard studies, minimum technical requirements for conducting and reporting those studies, recommendations regarding when surface-fault-rupture-hazard studies should be conducted based on fault activity class and the type of facility proposed, and procedures for establishing safe setback distances from active faults. City and county officials, planners, and consultants should refer to the guidelines regarding the details of conducting and reviewing surface-fault-rupture-hazard investigations. For well-defined faults color-coded red, orange, and green (Holocene, late Quaternary, and Quaternary, respectively), we recommend that surface-fault-rupture-hazard studies be performed in accordance with the UGS guidelines. Because paleoseismic data are lacking for the purple-coded faults (fault activity class unknown), we recommend that those faults be considered Holocene faults until paleoseismic studies demonstrate otherwise. Because buried and approximately located faults lack a clearly identifiable surface trace, they are not amenable to trenching, which is the standard surface-fault-rupture-hazard evaluation technique used to study well-defined faults (McCalpin, 1996). Where development is proposed proposed in a special-study area for a buried or approximately located fault, we recommend that at a minimum the following tasks be performed to better define the surface-fault-rupture hazard in those areas. If the results of these studies reveal evidence of possible surface-faulting-related features, those features should be trenched in accordance with the UGS guidelines. Following the above-recommended studies, if no evidence of surface faulting is found, development at the site can proceed as planned. However, we recommend that construction excavations and cuts be carefully examined for evidence of faulting as development proceeds. Review of published and unpublished maps, literature, and records concerning geologic units, faults, surface and ground water, previous subsurface investigations, and other relevant factors. Stereoscopic interpretation of aerial photographs to detect any subtle fault- related features expressed in the site topography, vegetation or soil contrasts, and any lineaments of possible fault origin. Field evaluation of the proposed site and surrounding area to observe pertinent surface evidence for faulting; map geologic units as necessary to define critical geologic relations; evaluate geomorphic features such as springs or seeps (aligned or not), sand blows or lateral spreads, or other evidence of earthquake-induced features; and excavation of test pits to evaluate the age of the deposits onsite to constrain the time of most recent surface faulting. 1. 2. 3. UTAH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY a division of Utah Department of Natural Resources Plate 1 Utah Geological Survey Special Study 127 Geologic Hazards and Adverse Construction Conditions, St. George−Hurricane Metropolitan Area, Washington County, Utah

Upload: others

Post on 13-Oct-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: PLATE 1 SURFACE-FAULT-RUPTURE-HAZARD MAP FOR THE …R 15 W R 14 W R 14 W R 13 W T 41 S T 40 S T 42 S T 41 S T 42 S T 43 S 37 15' N 37 7' 30" N 37 N 113 22' 30" W 113 30' W 113 37

08 09

06

10

18

19

19

30

07

18

08

0405 03

30

13

11

14

15

31

22

30

18

19

05

09

11

11

11

30

19

16

18

25

07

07

12

13

12

06

01

0102

09

04

15

10

14

27

22

15

24

24

26

10

13

26

03

12

21

29

22

12

15

25

23

22

27

01

23

13

23

12

20

12

10

13

24

24

29

24

25

36

13

36

1314

09

25

29

14

21

28

20

08

03

28

13

28

21

17

21

17

24

36

24

23

29

22

09

25

20

16

02

16

14

09

04

21

28

16

21

1716

15

07

36

08

3332

23

10

3131

36353534 3436 3233 3332

36

343332

26

06

06

31

30

18

19

27

07

18

31

11

30

19

11

25

11

31

18

19

11

17

11

11

0206

35

11

26

31

30

11

31

22

06

07

18

05

06

30

19

07

30

18

09

19

18

31

06

04

18

07

30

19

03

20

07

01

10

36

08

01

07

34

19

31

1715

04

06

05

03

24

29

0503

27

24

24

17

13 14

08

03

12

12

05

26

22 23

30

22

25

14

12

16

13

13

28

13

25

12

10

21

05 02

36

01

23

10

26

01

26

02

10

03

04

23

35

15

15

34

10

32

22

01

14

03

10

01

35

36

12

33

26

21

27

15

35

27

24

20

22

33 34

24

15

04

20

10

22

13

32

16

25

28

22

23

17

04

23

25

20

08

08

29

17

09

36

27

24

27

24

02

25

09

17

1613

32 34

21

01

09

36

33

12

29

12

08

25 28

33

27

21

20

29

27

28

32

05

12

14

27

16

28

15

34

29

34

24

26

35

32

28

26

35

26

32

21

25

26 25

05

23

20

2928

35

20

35

14

23

34

29

16

33

33

36

27

09

36

20

16

32

28

34

35

22

17

33

23

14

28

02

21

26

03

33

16

09

01

34

14

04

06

15

04

02

27

02

08

0102

21

17

31 32 3336 3435

35

Quail

reviR nigriV

atnaS

aralC

revi

R

nigriV

tro

F

ecra

eP

hsa

W

Bloomington

Bloomington HillsSouth

.dR sdleiF notgnihsa

W

Telegraph St.

wonS

yawk

raP

noyn

aC

tsa

E 00

2

®q

SURFACE-FAULT-RUPTURE-HAZARD MAP FOR THE ST. GEORGE–HURRICANE METROPOLITAN AREA

Basemap consists of National Agricultural Imagery Programnatural color aerial photography.

Universal Transverse Mercator Projection, zone 12.North American Datum 1983.

OldUS-91

Bloomington HillsNorth

LittleValley

§̈¦15

§̈¦15

§̈¦15

§̈¦15

Middleton

.dR r

evi

R

Sun River

St. George Blvd.

.tS f

fulB

reviR

EXPLANATION

GreenValley

Sunbrook

!(8

!(18

37 N113 15' W

!(18

eixi

D

.rD

tniuqanoT.r

D.r

DBloomington

Man O War Rd.

.dR mahgirB

§̈¦15

reviR

.dR

nigriVreviR

Stone Cliff

Knolls

Ledges

Diamond Valley

Riverside.rD

0541

1580 South

WashingtonFields

tsaE 0074

htuoS

§̈¦15

!(9

Creek

Reservoir

Sand

Hollow

Reservoir

!(9

!(59

!(9

!(17

R 16 W R 15 W

R 17 W R 16 W

T 42 ST 43 S

113 22' 30" W113 30' W113 37' 30" W R 15 W R 14 W

T 42 ST 41 S

T 41 ST 40 S

R 14 W R 13 W

R 13 W R 12 W

37 7' 30" N

37 15' N

R 17 W R 16 W

R 16 W R 15 W

R 15 W R 14 W

R 14 W R 13 W

T 41 ST 40 S

T 42 ST 41 S

T 42 ST 43 S

37 15' N

37 7' 30" N

37 N

113 22' 30" W

113 30' W

113 37' 30" W

2008

DISCUSSION

USING THIS MAP

MAP LIMITATIONS

SYMBOLS

Municipality boundary

Interstate Highway

State Highway

Major local surface street

Other road

troF

ecraeP hsaW

1 0 1 20.5Miles

1 0 1 20.5Kilometers

Scale 1:24,000

Approximate meandeclination, 2007

14o

HTR

ON

EU

RT

HTR

ON

CITEN

GAM

UTAH

Map Location

DER

SNIA

TNU

OM

wonS

noyn

aC

Santa ClaraHeights

dnaS

woll

oH

hsa

W

HTUOS SLLIH

tseW

kcalB

egdiR

lliH bbeW

slliH ytiC ecirP

note

lddi

M

kcal

B

egdi

R

bonihSebiK

emoD notgnihsaW

RE

NR

AW

EGD

IR

RENRA

W

YELLAV

DNAS

NIATNUOM

notgnihsaW

kcalB

egdiR

lliM

keer

C

emoD grubsirraH

keer

C

doownottoC

liau

Q

keer

C

sdeeL

keerC

eniveparG

hsaW

hsA

keer

C

SFFILC E

NACI

RR

UH

nikreV aL

keerC

nigriV

reviR

ENA

CIR

RU

H

SFFILC

dluoG

hsa

W

ellivnik

tA

hsa

W

ENA

CIR

RU

H

SFFI

LC

NIAT

NU

OM

KE

ER

C ELTTI L

An earthquake is the abrupt rapid shaking of the ground caused by sudden slippage of rocks deep beneath the Earth surface. Earthquakes occurwithout warning and can cause great injury and death, major economic loss, and social disruption. The surface along which the rocks slip is called afault. Several faults in the St. George – Hurricane metropolitan area are capable of producing earthquakes. Among the potential effects of largeearthquakes is surface faulting, which occurs when movement at depth on a fault during an earthquake propagates to the surface. The resultingdisplacement at the ground surface produces ground cracking and typically one or more “fault scarps.” Depending on the size of the earthquake, faultscarps can range from a few inches to many feet high and extend for many miles along the fault trace. Local ground tilting and graben formation bysecondary faulting may accompany surface faulting, resulting in a zone of deformation along the fault trace that can be tens to hundreds of feet wide.Surface faulting, while of limited aerial extent when compared to other earthquake-related hazards such as ground shaking, can have seriousconsequences for structures or other facilities that lie along or cross the rupture path.

For additional information about surface faulting and other earthquake-related hazards in the St. George – Hurricane metropolitan area, refer to theEarthquake-Hazards and Earthquake-Ground-Shaking Hazard text documents in this report.

Because surface faulting is typically confined to relatively narrow zones along the surface trace of a fault, early recognition and avoidance is the mosteffective strategy for mitigating this hazard. Once the activity class of the fault is determined, we recommend that facilities be set back from the fault traceand any associated zone of deformation in accordance with the UGS guidelines (Christenson and others, 2003). In the absence of practical designtechniques for mitigating surface faulting, carefully locating all potentially active fault traces on a site, assessing their level of activity and amount ofdisplacement, and establishing an appropriate setback distance from the fault remain the most reliable procedures for mitigating damage and injury due tosurface faulting.

In Utah, earthquake-resistant design requirements are specified in the seismic provisions of the International Building Code (International Code Council,2006a) and International Residential Code (International Code Council, 2006b), which are adopted statewide. IBC Section 1802.2.7 requires that aninvestigation be conducted for all structures in Seismic Design Categories C, D, E, or F (see Earthquake-Ground-Shaking-Hazard text document) to evaluatethe potential for surface rupture due to faulting.

Buried or approximately located Holocene or suspected Holocene fault: surface-fault-rupture-hazard studies recommended for allstructures intended for human occupancy and all critical facilities.

Well-defined Holocene (movement within the past 10,000 years) or suspected Holocene fault: surface-fault-rupture-hazard studiesrecommended for all structures intended for human occupancy and all critical facilities .

PLATE 1

by

William R. Lund, Tyler R. Knudsen, Garrett S. Vice, and Lucas M. Shaw

Well-defined late Quaternary (movement within the past 130,000 years) fault: surface-fault-rupture-hazard studies recommended for allcritical facilities. Studies for other structures for human occupancy remain prudent, but should be based on an assessment of whetherrisk-reduction measures are justified by weighing the probability of occurence against the risk to lives and potential economic loss.

Well-defined Quaternary (movement within the past 1,800,000 years) fault: surface-fault-rupture-hazard studies recommended for allcritical facilities. Studies for other structures intended for human occupancy are optional because of the low likelihood of surfacefaulting, although surface rupture along the fault is still possible.

Buried or approximately located Quaternary (movement within the past 1,800,000 years) fault: surface-fault-rupture-hazard studiesrecommended for all critical facilities. Studies for other structures intended for human occupancy are optional because of the lowlikelihood of surface faulting, although surface rupture along the fault is still possible.

Well-defined fault with unknown activity level: paleoseismic data are lacking, recommend treating as a Holocene fault until provenotherwise.

Buried or approximately located fault with unknown activity level: paleoseismic data are lacking, recommend treating as a Holocenefault until proven otherwise.

1

Surface-fault-rupture-hazard special-study area. The special-study areas established for well-defined faults extend for 500 feet on thedownthrown side and 250 feet on the upthrown side of each fault. Because their location is uncertain, the special-study areas aroundburied or approximately located faults are broader, extending 1000 feet on each side of the suspected trace of the faults.

HAZARD REDUCTION

The Surface-Fault-Rupture-Hazard Map is based on 1:24,000-scale geologic mapping. We believe that the inventory of potentially active faults obtainedfrom that mapping and shown on the map is complete or nearly so at that scale. However, some smaller faults may not have been detected during themapping or are concealed beneath young geologic deposits. Additionally, buried and approximately located faults by definition lack a clearly identifiablesurface trace, and therefore their location is imperfectly known. Site-specific fault-trenching studies should be preceded by a careful field evaluation of thesite to identify the surface trace of the fault, other faults not evident at 1:24,000-scale, or other fault-related features at a site-specific scale prior to trenching.

Fault - see Explanation for description of colorcodes; ball and bar on downthrown side of fault.

EG

RO

EG

TS

TLU

AF

NOT

GNI

HSA

W

TLU

AF

NOT

GNI

HSA

W

TLUA

F

WASHINGTONHOLLOW

FAULT

RE

NR

AW

YELLAV

TLU

AF

ENA

CIR

RU

H

TLUA

F

ENACIR

RUH

TLUAF

ENAC

IRRU

H

TLU

AF

®qProposed

Airport

1Critical facilities are Occupancy Category III and IV structures as defined in the International Building Code (IBC, table 1604.5, p. 281; International Code Council, 2006a), and include schools, hospitals, fire stations, high occupancy buildings, water-treatment facilities, and facilities containing hazardous materials.

Buried or approximately located late Quaternary (movement within the past 130,000 years) fault: surface-fault-rupture-hazard studiesrecommended for all critical facilities. Studies for other structures for human occupancy remain prudent, but should be based on anassessment of whether risk-reduction measures are justified by weighing the probability of occurence against the risk to lives andpotential economic loss.

Although this product represents the work of professional scientists, the Utah Department of Natural Resources,Utah Geological Survey, makes no warranty, expressed or implied, regarding its suitability for a particular use.The Utah Department of Natural Resources, Utah Geological Survey, shall not be liable under anycircumstances for any direct, indirect, special, incidental, or consequential damages with respect to claims byusers of this product.

For use at 1:24,000 scale only. The Utah Geological Survey does not guarantee accuracy or completeness ofdata.

The Surface-Fault-Rupture-Hazard Map shows potentially active faults along which surfacefaulting may occur. A special-study area is shown around each fault, within which the UGSrecommends that a site-specific, surface-fault-rupture-hazard study be performed prior toconstruction. These studies can resolve uncertainties inherent in generalized hazardmapping and help ensure safety by identifying the need for fault setbacks.

Utah Geological Survey Guidelines for Evaluating Surface-Fault-Rupture Hazards in Utah(Christenson and others, 2003) include a detailed rationale for performing surface-fault-rupture-hazard studies, minimum technical requirements for conducting and reporting thosestudies, recommendations regarding when surface-fault-rupture-hazard studies should beconducted based on fault activity class and the type of facility proposed, and procedures forestablishing safe setback distances from active faults. City and county officials, planners, andconsultants should refer to the guidelines regarding the details of conducting and reviewingsurface-fault-rupture-hazard investigations.

For well-defined faults color-coded red, orange, and green (Holocene, late Quaternary, andQuaternary, respectively), we recommend that surface-fault-rupture-hazard studies beperformed in accordance with the UGS guidelines. Because paleoseismic data are lacking forthe purple-coded faults (fault activity class unknown), we recommend that those faults beconsidered Holocene faults until paleoseismic studies demonstrate otherwise.

Because buried and approximately located faults lack a clearly identifiable surface trace, theyare not amenable to trenching, which is the standard surface-fault-rupture-hazard evaluationtechnique used to study well-defined faults (McCalpin, 1996). Where development isproposed

proposed in a special-study area for a buried or approximately located fault, we recommendthat at a minimum the following tasks be performed to better define the surface-fault-rupturehazard in those areas.

If the results of these studies reveal evidence of possible surface-faulting-related features,those features should be trenched in accordance with the UGS guidelines. Following theabove-recommended studies, if no evidence of surface faulting is found, development at thesite can proceed as planned. However, we recommend that construction excavations andcuts be carefully examined for evidence of faulting as development proceeds.

Review of published and unpublished maps, literature, and records concerninggeologic units, faults, surface and ground water, previous subsurfaceinvestigations, and other relevant factors.

Stereoscopic interpretation of aerial photographs to detect any subtle fault-related features expressed in the site topography, vegetation or soil contrasts,and any lineaments of possible fault origin.

Field evaluation of the proposed site and surrounding area to observe pertinentsurface evidence for faulting; map geologic units as necessary to define criticalgeologic relations; evaluate geomorphic features such as springs or seeps(aligned or not), sand blows or lateral spreads, or other evidence ofearthquake-induced features; and excavation of test pits to evaluate the age ofthe deposits onsite to constrain the time of most recent surface faulting.

1.

2.

3.

UTAH GEOLOGICAL SURVEYa division of

Utah Department of Natural Resources

Plate 1

Utah Geological Survey Special Study 127

Geologic Hazards and Adverse Construction Conditions,

St. George−Hurricane Metropolitan Area, Washington County, Utah