plastics carry bags benefits, issues, realities & solutions
DESCRIPTION
Plastics Carry Bags Benefits, Issues, Realities & Solutions. CARRY BAGS - WHY PLASTICS ? PLASTIC BAGS - COMMON MISCONCEPTIONS ENVIRONMENTAL BURDEN FOR ALTERNATIVES TO PLASTIC CARRY BAGS ISSUES SOLUTIONS – WASTE MANAGEMENT & RECYCLING RECOMMENDATION. CONTENTS. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Plastics Carry Bags
Benefits, Issues, Realities
&
Solutions
• CARRY BAGS - WHY PLASTICS ?
• PLASTIC BAGS - COMMON MISCONCEPTIONS
• ENVIRONMENTAL BURDEN FOR ALTERNATIVES TO
PLASTIC CARRY BAGS
• ISSUES
• SOLUTIONS
– WASTE MANAGEMENT & RECYCLING
• RECOMMENDATION
CONTENTS
Replacing Traditional Materials
…Due to Superior Properties
• Safe & Hygienic – Inert and Chemical Resistance
•Light Weight & Non-Breakability
•Excellent Barrier Properties - Enhancing Shelf-
life
•Superior Impact Resistance
•Transparency as well as Opacity
•Lower Fuel Consumption and Product Loss
during Transportation
All These… at Lesser Cost
Material Energy Requirement
KWH Kg-1
Aluminum 74.1
Steel 13.9
Glass 7.9
Paper 7.1
Plastic 3.1
WHY PLASTICS ?
Scott, G and Gilead, D., editors, Degradable Polymers, Principles and Application, Chapman & Hall, London, 1995
• Global Consumption of plastics ~ 180
million tonnes (Per Capita ~ 28kg)
• Indian Consumption of plastics ~6.5
million tonnes ( Per Capita ~ 6kg)
• Plastic carry bag accounts for less than 1%
of total plastic consumption.
PLASTICS
ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS
PLASTICS : TOP GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSION SAVER
In 2005, Total Global Emissions was 46 GtCO2e
It could have been 51.2 Gt CO2e, but for the savings by Chemical Industry
Savings by Chemical Industry 11%
Plastics save green house gas emissions
And save the earth from Global Warming
Among The Top 10 Green House Gas Emission Saving Sectors - 4 are Plastics
Insulation Materials Packaging AutomobilesPiping
Source: McKinsey cLCA study for International Council of Chemical Association
GHG EMISSION SAVING BY PLASTICS PACKAGING
Total Saving ˜ 220 Mt CO2e
Plastics Carry Bags reduce GHG emission
Source: McKinsey cLCA study for International Council of Chemical Association
ALTERNATIVES TO PLASTICS CARRY BAGS?
• Jute
• Textile
• Paper
• Degradable Plastics
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE VARIOUS OPTIONS
ENERGY SAVING:1 LAC MT. OF ATTA PACKAGING
Energy consumption in GJ for
Manufacturing Raw Materials,
Packaging and Transportation of Atta
Energy saving – 81%
Energy recovery with plastics waste-35
GJSource: LCA Study by IIT (Delhi)
Jute Vs Plastic
The comparison holds good for Plastics Vs Jute Carry Bags
**Values are for Packaging of One Lac MT of Atta
* High potential for Global Warming
During production of rawMaterial & bags
Source – Report by Centre for Polymer Science and Engineering, IIT - Delhi
ENVIRONMENTAL BURDEN…
During transportation of the finished bags
Jute Bag Vs Plastic Bag
AIR & WATER POLLUTION
Source: Scott, G and Gilead, D., Editors, Degradable Polymers, Principles and Application, Chapman & Hall, London, 1995
29
67
9.9
28.1
6.810.8
1.53.8 16.4
0.56.8
0.5
107.8
0.2
43.1
0
50
100
150
Envir
onm
enta
l Bur
den
on
Com
mon
Sca
le
GJ SO2 Nox CH4 CO Dust COD BOD
Polyethylene
Paper
Energy for ↑ Manufacture
Polyethylene Vs Paper
Figures for 50, 000 carry bags
Emissions →
PLASTIC & TEXTILE BAGS
Plastics manufacturing consumes 400 kwh/mt while
composite textile mills consume 1310 kwh/mt
Textile contributes 30% SOx (second highest by any
sector) and 23% NOx (highest by any sector)Source : Warmer Bulletin, July 01
This gives a comparative analysis of environmental
burden generated by paper, jute & textile bags which
are not visible to naked eyes though, in comparison
to plastic bags!
• Increase shelf-life of contents
• Essential for packaging / carrying
of confectionery, bakery products
• Essential for packaging / carrying
hygroscopic products like sugar / salt / jaggary
• Convenient for carrying fish / meat / poultry and other wet
food products – no other appropriate alternatives
• Essential to carry commodities during rainy season
• Add convenience to day-to-day life
PLASTICS BAGS / CARRY BAGS
PLASTIC & PAPER CARRY BAGS
Plastic carry bags generate 60 % less GHG than uncomposted
paper bags & 79% than composted paper bags
Source: ULS LCA Report, USA and other reports
PLASTIC & PAPER CARRY BAGS
Plastic grocery bags consume 40% less energy during
production and generate 80% less solid waste after use.
Source: ULS LCA Report, USA and other reports
PLASTIC & PAPER CARRY BAGS
Source: ULS LCA Report, USA and other reports
Plastic grocery bags consume 40% less energy during production and
generate 80% less solid waste after use than paper bags.
PLASTIC & PAPER CARRY BAGS
Source: ULS LCA Report, USA and other reports
PLASTIC & PAPER CARRY BAGS
Paper bags generate 70% more air pollutants and ~ 50 times more water pollutants than plastic bags do.
Source: ULS LCA Report, USA and other reports
PLASTIC & PAPER CARRY BAGS
Plastics and Paper both can be recycled. However it takes 91%
less energy to recycle a kg of plastic than a kg of paper.
Source: ULS LCA Report, USA and other reports
• 150,000 plastic bags of
20 cm x 30 cm x 40 micron needs 1 small tempo for transportation
• Paper bags of same size & number need ~ 10 such tempos for transportation - due to higher
weight and volume Consuming more
fuel and causing more air pollution
PLASTIC & PAPER CARRY BAGS
DESPITE ALL THESE POSITIVE ATTRIBUTES …
PLASTIC BAGS ARE UNDER SCANNER
MAJOR ISSUES
Health & safety
Toxicity
Biodegradability
Disposal & waste management
HEALTH & SAFETY
Polythene is approved safe material forUse …
• In contact with food, pharmaceuticals and drinking water
• As implants within human body
• In medical applications like IV bottle, Packaging of tablets
• For Packaging of Liquid Milk
Plastic Carry Bags are generally made from Polyethylene
TOXICITY
Issue:
Plastics are termed as toxic and injurious to health
Fact:
• Plastics are inert materials and do not pose any danger of toxicity
• Emissions during processing of plastics are well within regulatory
norms (study by SIIR –
Delhi)
• Additives used in plastics are approved as per BIS / FDA standards
• Emissions at fire situation have similar or lesser implications in
comparison to situation involving natural organic materials like
wood, paper & cotton
• Emissions during burning of paper and polyethylene are similar
BIODEGRADABILITY
Issue:
Non-biodegradability property of plastics carry bags is termed as
the major reason of waste management problem
• Plastics are useful for its long life characteristics
• Nothing decomposes substantially in modern landfills.
It requires additional mechanical action for composting
degradable waste
• Indian Landfills does not practice Composting Activity
BIODEGRADABLE OR RECYCLABLE PLASTICS ?
• Compostable plastics will degrade/compost only in
composting conditions
• The concept of Biodegradable Plastics will encourage littering
• Spurious products cannot be detected in market place causing
flooding of fake bags
• A mixture of degradable and non-degradable plastics will disturb
the plastics recycling activity
• During decomposition stage biodegradable plastics emit CO2 and
CH4 – both green house gases
BIODEGRADATION OR RECYCLING ?
• Biodegradable Plastics have been developed
• However these are required in applications where recycling is not
possible or difficult
• Developed countries – major manufacturers of BD Plastics – have
not mandated use of Biodegradable Plastics Carry Bags in their
countries
Reuse and Recycling is preferred over degradation to encourage Resource Management
USE OF BIODEGRADABLE PLASTICS
Recommended applications of BD plastics:
• Nursery Bags,
• Mulch/Agricultural film,
• One – time use Cutlery / Cups etc to be Carried
in Ships / Remote areas
• Lamination on jute – paper for Relevant Packaging
Applications etc
DISPOSAL
Issue:
Plastics are blamed as the major cause of MSW problem
Facts:
• According to studies plastics form about 5% of total MSW in
major Indian Metros
• A recent study at Deonar dumping area (Mumbai) reveals
that ~ 90 % of plastics waste brought to the landfill are picked
up by rag pickers and sold to waste trades for recycling
PLASTICS IN MSW
NEERI study - 2005
ISSUE – INDIAN CONTEXT
WHILE ALL SOLID / THICK PLASTICS WASTE IS
SYSTEMATICALLY PICKED UP BY THE WASTE
COLLECTORS FOR RECYCLING, DISPOSAL OF THIN
PLASTIC CARRY BAGS, SINGLE-USE PLASTIC WASTE AND
MULTI-LAYER PACKETS, ABANDONED BY THE WASTE
PICKERS, HAVE CREATED SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT
PROBLEM
PLASTIC CARRY BAGS : GLOBAL MATRIX
• No developed country in the world has any thickness restriction of
Plastic Carry bags
• No country in the world has mandated use of Biodegradable
Plastics for any mass commodity product like Carry Bags
• In California - USA, initial measures for banning of normal plastic
bags in favour of biodegradable plastics / paper bags has been
stricken down by the Superior Court asking for conducting LCA
study on the products
• France dropped its earlier proposal for banning of normal plastic
bags in favour of Biodegradable Plastic Bags on the direction from
EU Parliament
PLASTIC CARRY BAGS : GLOBAL MATRIX
• Australia has plans to reduce the use of thin HDPE bags by
50% over a period of three years
• Some developed countries levy tax on all packaging
materials including plastic carry bags – to meet the cost of
managing the waste
• Many developing countries including China & India have
thickness and size restrictions
• Only Bangladesh and some African nations have imposed
ban on plastic carry bags
PLASTIC CARRY BAGS : INDIAN RULES
• IN THE STATES OF MAHARASHTRA, GOA, WEST BENGAL, MEGHALAYA, PUNJUB, HIMACHAL PRADESH, KERALA THE THICKNESS RULE VARIES FROM 30 TO 70 MICRONS
• IN DELHI , CHANDIGARH AND J & K, PLASTICS CARRY BAGS ARE BANNED
• ALL OTHER STATES FOLLOW MoEF RULE OF 20 MICRONS
SOLUTION TO DISPOSAL PROBLEM
• Segregation at source – awareness among citizens against littering
• Proper system for collection of segregated wastes for facilitating recycling
• Incentives / encouragement for recycling
• Upgradation of the existing mechanical recycling technology
• Encouragement for alternate methods of recycling / recovery of energy
WASTE MANAGEMENT: CASE STUDY
Rag pickers with van Loading of dry waste in Municipality van
Dry waste being carried for loading
into Municipality van
Dry waste at housing colonies
Municipality van with dry waste on way to
segregation area
SEGREGATION OF WASTE AT SOURCE
‘A’ – WARD MUMBAI
Segregation of dry waste
Packing of segregated dry waste
Storing of segregation dry waste in secured
place
Segregation of dry waste being weighed and sold to recyclers /
traders
‘A’ – WARD MUMBAI
SEGREGATION OF WASTE AT SOURCE
A comparative assessment of
the segregation activities in
select Mumbai Wards
There is wealth in Waste
DRY WASTE SEGREGATION DATA MUMBAI WARDS – A, D, F(N), M (E & W), S & T
BMC provides dry waste
collection vans and secured
segregation area free of cost
CONVENTIONAL RECYCLING
CONVENTIONAL RECYCLING
CONVENTIONAL RECYCLING
NON-CONVENTIONAL RECYCLING AND RECOVERY
– Co-processing in Cement Kilns / Energy Recovery
– Conversion to Fuel
– Construction of Asphalt Road
– Conversion to Basic Chemical
Invention by Indian Scientist Dr. Alka Zadgaonkar
Raisoni College of Engineering, Nagpur
FUEL FROM WASTE PLASTICS
SCIENTIFIC SOLUTION TO PLASTICS WASTE DISPOSAL WITH RECOVERY OF
ENERGY
ACC Plant at Kymore - MP
All types of plastics waste – laminated, mixed & uncleaned, can be co-processed in Cement Kiln in partial replacement of coal
CALORIFIC VALUES (MJ / KG) : Plastics ~ 45: Coal ~ 29
CPCB HAS APPROVED THE PROCESS
PLASTICS WASTE IN ROAD CONSTRUCTION
ASPHALT PLANT OF BMC, WORLI, MUMBAI
Prof. V S AGHASE ROAD DADAR, MUMBAI
Vidyasagar Street – Kalyani, West Bengal
PLASTICS WASTE IN ROAD CONSTRUCTION
Bawana, Delhi
PLASTICS WASTE IN ROAD CONSTRUCTION
RECOMMENDATIONS
IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPREHENSIVE PACKAGING
WASTE RULE SIMILAR TO THOSE PREVAILING IN
DEVELOPED COUNTRIES
PROPER IMPLEMENTATION OF MUNICIPAL SOLID
WASTE (MANAGEMENT & HANDLING) RULE, 2000 OF
MoEF, GOVT OF INDIA
UNIFORM PLASTIC CARRY BAG THICKNESS RULE IN THE
ENTIRE COUNTRY AND PROPER IMPLEMENTATION OF
THE SAME
RECOMMENDATIONS
ENCOURAGEMENT AND INCENTIVES FOR RECYCLING
ACTIVITY AS PER RECOMMENDATION IN THE SUPREME
COURT COMMITTEE REPORT ON SWM IN CLASS I
CITIES OF
INDIA – 1999
MANDATING CO-PROCESSING OF PLASTICS WASTE IN
ALL
CEMENT KILNS IN THE COUNTRY
AWARENESS MESSAGE TO ALL CITIZENS