plant physiology preview. published on january 30, 2015, as doi:10.1104/pp… · 2015. 1. 30. · 0...
TRANSCRIPT
Running head: Evolution of stomatal responses to VPD 1
2
Corresponding author: 3
Scott McAdam 4
School of Biological Sciences 5
University of Tasmania 6
Private Bag 55 7
Hobart, TAS, 7005 8
AUSTRALIA 9
Ph: +61362262248 10
12
Research area: Ecophysiology and Sustainability 13
14
Plant Physiology Preview. Published on January 30, 2015, as DOI:10.1104/pp.114.252940
Copyright 2015 by the American Society of Plant Biologists
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on May 4, 2021. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Title: The evolution of mechanisms driving the stomatal response to vapour pressure deficit 15
16
Authors: 17
Scott A. M. McAdam 18
Timothy J. Brodribb 19
20
Institution address: 21
School of Biological Sciences 22
University of Tasmania 23
Hobart, TAS, 7001 24
AUSTRALIA 25
26
One-sentence summary: The mechanism for a stomatal response to vapour pressure deficit evolved 27
from a passive regulation in basal vascular plants to mediation by ABA in the earliest angiosperms. 28
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on May 4, 2021. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Footnotes: 29
Financial Source: This work was funded by Australian Research Council grants DP120101868 and 30
FT100100237 (to TJB) and DE140100946 (to SAMM). 31
Corresponding Author: Scott A. M. McAdam ([email protected]) 32
33
Keywords: stomata, humidity, vapour pressure deficit (VPD), abscisic acid (ABA), hysteresis, leaf gas 34
exchange 35
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on May 4, 2021. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Abstract 36
Stomatal responses to vapour pressure deficit (VPD) are a principal means by which vascular land 37
plants regulate daytime transpiration. While much work has focused on characterising and 38
modelling this response, there remains no consensus as to the mechanism that drives it. 39
Explanations range from passive regulation by leaf hydration, to biochemical regulation by the 40
phytohormone abscisic acid (ABA). We monitored ABA levels, leaf gas exchange and water status in 41
a diversity of vascular land plants exposed to a symmetrical, mild transition in VPD. The stomata in 42
basal lineages of vascular plants, including gymnosperms, appeared to respond passively to changes 43
in leaf water status induced by VPD perturbation, with minimal changes in foliar ABA levels and no 44
hysteresis in stomatal action. In contrast, foliar ABA appeared to drive the stomatal response to VPD 45
in our angiosperm sample. Increased foliar ABA level at high VPD in angiosperm species resulted in 46
hysteresis in the recovery of stomatal conductance (gs); this was most pronounced in herbaceous 47
species. Increased levels of ABA in the leaf epidermis were found to originate from sites of synthesis 48
in other parts of the leaf, rather than from the guard cells themselves. The transition from a passive, 49
to ABA-regulation of the stomatal response to VPD, in the earliest angiosperms is likely to have had 50
critical implications for the ecological success of this lineage. 51
52
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on May 4, 2021. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Introduction 53
Plants continuously regulate transpiration by controlling the aperture of the stomatal pores on the 54
surface of the leaf. The principal atmospheric determinant of stomatal aperture is the humidity of 55
the air, which can be expressed as the vapour pressure difference between the leaf and the 56
atmosphere. Stomatal responses to atmospheric vapour pressure deficit (VPD) have been well 57
characterised across the diversity of vascular plant species (Darwin, 1898; Lange et al., 1971; Turner 58
et al., 1984; Franks and Farquhar, 1999; Oren et al., 1999; Brodribb and McAdam, 2011; Mott and 59
Peak, 2013), with stomata typically closing at high VPD and opening at low VPD. This 60
comprehensive characterisation has allowed for the development of highly effective empirical and 61
mechanistic models of leaf gas exchange which provide robust predictions of the responses of 62
transpiration to changes in VPD (Buckley et al., 2003; Katul et al., 2009; Damour et al., 2010; Medlyn 63
et al., 2011). Despite the success of this modelling, the mechanism for the stomatal response to VPD 64
remains poorly understood (Damour et al., 2010). Different hypotheses range from one extreme 65
whereby stomata respond passively through changes in leaf water content induced by the VPD or 66
humidity perturbation (Lange et al., 1971; Mott and Peak, 2013) to the other extreme whereby 67
stomata close uniquely in response to the phytohormone abscisic acid (ABA) (Xie et al., 2006; Bauer 68
et al., 2013). 69
From the earliest recognition that stomata open and close by changes in guard cell turgor (Heath, 70
1938), there have been many attempts to link the passive changes in water status that occur during 71
VPD or humidity transitions with stomatal responses to VPD or humidity (Lange et al., 1971; Mott 72
and Peak, 2013). Studies have suggested that changes in atmospheric water content passively drives 73
stomatal responses by changing bulk leaf water status which in turn changes guard cell turgor (Oren 74
et al., 1999) or alternatively by changing guard cell turgor directly (Mott and Peak, 2013). Models 75
based on these entirely passive processes are highly effective in predicting steady-state stomatal 76
conductance (gs) in response to changes in VPD or humidity in angiosperms (Mott and Peak, 2013). 77
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on May 4, 2021. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
While hydraulic models provide robust predictions of steady-state gs, they are less effective at 78
predicting the dynamic responses of stomata to short term perturbations, particularly with respect 79
to the “wrong-way responses” that typically occur as transients (Buckley, 2005), as well as feed-80
forward behaviour (Farquhar, 1978; Bunce, 1997; Franks et al., 1997; Tardieu and Simonneau, 1998; 81
Ocheltree et al., 2014; although cf. Mott & Peak, 2013). Although some of these models provide a 82
pathway for incorporating the effect of ABA (Buckley, 2005), a lack of knowledge of ABA dynamics or 83
action makes it difficult to integrate the influence of this active regulator of guard cell aperture into 84
models. Stomatal behaviour of single gene mutants (most notably the ABA synthesis and signalling 85
mutants of Arabidopsis); strongly support a role for ABA in mediating standard stomatal responses 86
to changes in VPD. The stomata of these mutants are known to have less pronounced responses to 87
a reduction in relatively humidity compared to wild-type plants (Xie et al., 2006). Recently, 88
molecular work has shown that guard cells express many of the genes required to synthesise ABA 89
(Okamoto et al., 2009; Bauer et al., 2013), with molecular proxies for ABA level also indicating that 90
the biochemical activity of ABA in guard cell may increase following short-term exposure of leaves to 91
a reduction in relative humidity (Waadt et al., 2014). These findings suggest a role for ABA in 92
regulating stomatal responses to VPD; and have led to the conclusion that ABA synthesised 93
autonomously by the guard cells is the predominant mechanism for stomatal responses to increased 94
VPD (Bauer et al., 2013). 95
Although the experimental evidence from molecular studies presents an argument for the role of 96
ABA in the responses of stomata to changes in VPD, very few studies have quantified changes in ABA 97
level in response to VPD. It is well established that ABA levels in leaves and guard cells can increase 98
rapidly following the imposition of turgor loss or water stress (Pierce and Raschke, 1980; Harris et 99
al., 1988; Harris and Outlaw, 1991). However, only a few studies have reported increases in foliar 100
ABA level in response to high VPD (Bauerle et al., 2004; Giday et al., 2013), and none have 101
investigated whether these observed dynamic changes or differences in ABA level were functionally 102
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on May 4, 2021. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
relevant for stomatal control. In addition, no study has quantified the levels of ABA in guard cells 103
during a transition in VPD. 104
Here we investigate the relative importance of ABA for the stomatal response to VPD in whole 105
plants, sampled from across the vascular land plant lineage. We provide the first functional 106
assessment of changes in ABA levels driving stomatal responses to VPD; as well as critically 107
investigate the recent suggestion that stomatal responses to VPD are driven by an autonomous 108
guard cell synthesis of ABA. 109
Results 110
Hysteresis in the response of angiosperm stomata to VPD 111
During a reversible sequence of VPD transitions (from 0.7 to 1.5 to 0.7 kPa) all species showed a 112
pronounced reduction in gs in response to the increase in VPD to 1.5 kPa (Figs 1, 2 and 3). In all 113
species gs declined by between 50% and 70% when VPD was increased from 0.7 kPa to 1.5 kPa 114
(Supplementary Table S1). While stomatal closure at increased VPD was relatively similar across 115
species there were large differences between species in the recovery of gs on returning to 0.7 kPa, 116
with only angiosperm species displaying hysteresis in the recovery of gs (Fig. 4). In the six diverse 117
fern and conifer species, the rate of stomatal closure during a VPD transition from 0.7 to 1.5 kPa was 118
the same as that for stomatal opening when the original VPD was restored (Fig. 4) indicating a rapid, 119
symmetrical stomatal response to VPD in these basal lineages. In contrast in the two herbaceous 120
angiosperm species the rate of stomatal closure at high VPD was much greater than the rate of 121
stomatal opening on returning to low VPD (Fig. 4). Stomatal responses to VPD in the woody 122
angiosperm species (including the most basal angiosperm A. trichopoda) were intermediate in terms 123
of difference between the rate of stomatal closure at high VPD and opening at low VPD, between 124
the species from the basal vascular land plant groups and herbaceous angiosperms (Fig. 4). 125
The role of foliar ABA levels during a VPD transition 126
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on May 4, 2021. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
In the angiosperm species (Fig. 1) and two of the three conifers (Fig. 2), a concomitant increase in 127
foliar ABA level was observed as gs declined when plants were exposed to a moderate increase in 128
VPD from 0.7 kPa to 1.5 kPa. In the two herbaceous angiosperm species, P. sativum and D. hybrida, 129
increasing foliar ABA levels alone were sufficient to account for the observed stomatal closure on 130
exposure to a VPD of 1.5 kPa (Fig. 1; Fig. 5). This functional level of foliar ABA is shown by the red 131
horizontal line and represents the ABA level required to produce the equivalent response of stomata 132
assuming ABA was uniquely driving the closure of stomata. This level was determined from the 133
sensitivity of gs to exogenously applied ABA in the absence of water stress (Fig. 5). 134
In the two herbaceous species returning to low VPD was accompanied by a very slow decline in foliar 135
ABA levels, as well as a similar, very slow, hysteretic recovery of gs (Fig. 1). The very slow recovery in 136
gs at low VPD in the two herbaceous species was reflected in higher Ψ l following the final transition 137
in VPD to 0.7 kPa, compared with values measured at 0.7 kPa prior to the VPD transitions (Table 1). 138
In the most basal woody angiosperm species, A. trichopoda, rising foliar ABA levels also explained 139
the observed decline in gs following a transition to high VPD as predicted by the relationship 140
between gs and endogenously applied ABA (Figs 1 and 5). When VPD was returned to 0.7 kPa foliar 141
ABA levels returned slowly to their original levels leading to significant hysteresis in the recovery of 142
gs (Figs 1 and 4). In the other woody angiosperm species, Q. robur, exposure to high VPD resulted in 143
a rapid increase in foliar ABA almost to a level sufficient to explain the depression in gs (Figs 1 and 5). 144
In Q. robur declining ABA levels upon restoration of the initial VPD were also relatively rapid and 145
were accompanied by no significant hysteresis in the response of gs (P = 0.052, Fig. 4). 146
To test whether the increase in foliar ABA levels in the leaves of angiosperm species at high VPD was 147
due to an enhanced delivery of ABA from the xylem sap, driven by increased evaporation, or 148
endogenous synthesis of foliar ABA, we measured ABA levels and gs in stems of A. trichopoda that 149
were excised under water and exposed to a reversible transition in VPD. In branches of A. 150
trichopoda excised under water, foliar ABA levels increased on exposure to a step increase in VPD 151
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on May 4, 2021. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
after 20 min and this increase in foliar ABA level corresponded with a reduction in gs (Fig. 6). The 152
functional increase in foliar ABA level, in these excised stems, occurred despite xylem sap ABA 153
concentrations being 90 times lower than levels in an intact plant under low VPD conditions, 154
approaching the detection limits of the ultra-performance liquid chromatograph tandem mass 155
spectrometer (UPLC-MS) (Fig. 6). 156
Unlike the angiosperm representatives, foliar ABA levels in the conifer species remained an order of 157
magnitude too low to explain the significant stomatal closure observed in response to increased VPD 158
this was based on the sensitivity of gs to exogenously applied ABA (Figs 2 and 4) and in M. 159
glyptostroboides the sensitivity of gs to ABA determined by three independent methods (including 160
isolated epidermis, exogenous feeding and rehydration of branches with different levels of 161
endogenously synthesised ABA (McAdam and Brodribb, 2014)). In addition, changes in Ψ l in all 162
conifer species were consistent with a passive control of stomatal aperture by leaf water status 163
(Table 1). All of the representative fern species showed rapid and pronounced stomatal closure in 164
response to the imposed VPD transition, but no significant change in foliar ABA level was observed 165
during the VPD transition (Fig. 3). All differences in foliar ABA level observed in the fern species 166
were due to differences between leaves sampled rather than due to the VPD treatment imposed on 167
the plants (Supplementary Fig. S1). 168
Distribution of ABA in angiosperm leaves 169
At the same time as ABA levels, in the leaf of the herbaceous angiosperm P. sativum, doubled during 170
an increasing transition in VPD from 0.7 kPa to 1.5 kPa (Fig. 1), the proportion of ABA in the abaxial 171
epidermis, declined by more than half, from 40% to just under 15% of the total ABA found the in 172
whole leaf (Fig. 7a). When ABA levels in the epidermis were expressed relative to fresh weight of 173
the sample, the increases in abaxial epidermal ABA during an increase in VPD significantly lagged 174
behind the more pronounced increase in ABA levels that occurred in the remainder of the leaf (Fig. 175
7b, Supplementary Fig. S2). To test whether this increase in foliar ABA could reach the guard cells in 176
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on May 4, 2021. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
this mutant with an extreme morphology (having an epidermis that is only connected to the leaf 177
along major veins) we fed labelled [2H6]ABA into the transpiration stream. During the feeding of 178
labelled [2H6]ABA we monitored leaf gas exchange and performed UPLC-MS analysis to investigate 179
the presence of [2H6]ABA in the abaxial epidermis. Following feeding into the transpiration stream 180
the stomata of the Argenteum mutant did indeed close and [2H6]ABA could be readily identified in 181
the epidermis immediately upon closure of stomata (Fig. 5d) despite the significant separation of the 182
epidermis from the mesophyll. 183
Discussion 184
Ancestral, passive-hydraulic regulation of stomatal responses to VPD 185
In monitoring both foliar ABA levels and leaf gas exchange during VPD transitions we show evidence 186
for systematic differences between plant groups in the mechanisms that regulate the stomatal 187
response to VPD in vascular land plants. Similar to previously described patterns in the responses of 188
stomata to water stress across diverse species (Brodribb and McAdam, 2011; McAdam and Brodribb, 189
2014), we show that stomatal responses to VPD are characterised by passive-hydraulic regulation in 190
ferns and conifers, whereby stomata respond as simple, hydraulic valves opening in response to an 191
increase in leaf turgor and closing in response to a decrease in leaf turgor (we refer to this as the 192
ancestral, passive-hydraulic regulation of stomatal aperture. Unlike in lycophytes, ferns and 193
conifers, when angiosperm species are exposed to an increase in VPD initially stomata open, this 194
wrong-way response is also passive but driven by the epidermis loosing turgor faster than the guard 195
cells (Mott et al., 1997; Franks and Farquhar, 2007)). In this study we pinpoint the origin of ABA-196
mediated stomatal responses to VPD to the earliest angiosperms. 197
Lycophytes, ferns and conifers have stomatal responses that conform to a passive-hydraulic model 198
for gs which is independent of foliar ABA (Brodribb and McAdam, 2011; McAdam and Brodribb, 199
2014) and we show here that no functional increase in ABA level occurs in the leaves of fern and 200
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on May 4, 2021. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
conifer species in response to changes in VPD. These results contrast the with conclusions reached 201
by Ruszala et al. (2011) and Chater et al. (2011) who suggested that the stomatal response to ABA 202
(and presumably, although not tested, the regulation of stomatal responses to VPD by ABA) had an 203
ancient evolutionary origin at the base of the mosses. Interestingly, while we have suggested that 204
the conifers represent the first extant lineage of vascular plants to possess a functional stomatal 205
response to ABA (Brodribb and McAdam, 2011; McAdam and Brodribb, 2012; cf. Ruszala et al., 206
2011), the earliest role for ABA in the regulation of stomatal aperture can been attributed solely to 207
enhancing stomatal closure during drought stress, and probably not functional stomatal responses 208
to VPD, at least in well watered plants (Brodribb and McAdam, 2013). 209
Foliar ABA regulates the stomatal response to VPD in angiosperms 210
While the passive, hydraulic regulation of the stomatal response to VPD can be readily observed in 211
the basal lineages of vascular land plants (Brodribb and McAdam, 2011; McAdam and Brodribb, 212
2014), angiosperm stomata are characteristically distinct from the stomata of other land plant 213
groups. During reversible transitions in VPD we identified a functionally and statistically significant 214
increase in foliar ABA levels in three of the four angiosperm species examined (Fig. 1), and show that 215
this increase in ABA level is likely due to synthesis in the leaf rather than increased delivery of ABA 216
from the xylem sap (Fig. 5). This provides the first quantitative evidence that increases in foliar ABA 217
levels in response to changes in VPD in angiosperms can exceed levels that will cause a similar 218
degree of stomatal closure in the absence of water stress, and complements conclusions reached by 219
the qualitative assessments of ABA signalling and synthesis mutants; namely that ABA levels play a 220
major role in delivering stomatal responses to VPD in angiosperms (Xie et al., 2006). Many of the 221
past methods, especially the popular immuno-assay methods, used to quantify foliar ABA levels 222
(Walker-Simmons et al., 2000) and other hormones, from foliar auxin levels (Cohen et al., 1987) to 223
steroids in baboon faeces (Gesquiere et al., 2014), unless rigorously standardised against 224
physiocochemical methods, do not possess the resolution required to detect small but functionally 225
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on May 4, 2021. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
significant increases in hormone levels similar to what we show occur in angiosperm leaves during 226
exposure to high VPD. This limitation in resolution may explain previous observations that ABA 227
levels only noticeably increase when plants are exposed to water stress sufficient enough to cause 228
turgor loss (Pierce and Raschke, 1980; Trejo and Davies, 1991; Wilkinson and Davies, 1997) and the 229
paucity of data showing rapid ABA accumulation in leaves during an increasing VPD transition. While 230
the increase in foliar ABA levels that we observed in angiosperm species with increasing VPD were 231
functionally and statistically significant, there was a degree of variation between leaves in the 232
canopy which may have been due to heterogeneity in foliar morphology or hydraulics. 233
Interestingly, while we show here that foliar ABA appears to drive stomatal responses to changes in 234
VPD in angiosperms, a number of studies have shown that the exposure of angiosperm leaves to low 235
humidity is a critical prerequisite for delivering normal stomatal responses to ABA and that high 236
humidity can desensitise stomata to ABA (Arve et al., 2013; Pantin et al., 2013; Aliniaeifard et al., 237
2014). This interaction is like due to low humidity being a strong up regulator of both ABA synthetic 238
and signalling genes (Pantin et al., 2013) and not due to changes in stomatal or leaf anatomy at high 239
humidity (Aliniaeifard et al., 2014). 240
Predominance of ABA from the leaf driving the stomatal responses to VPD in angiosperms 241
Qualitative molecular studies of ABA synthesis mutants have led to the hypothesis that ABA 242
originating in guard cells is solely responsible for driving the stomatal response to VPD (Bauer et al., 243
2013). We tested this hypothesis using the Argenteum mutant of the angiosperm herb Pisum 244
sativum, which has fully functional stomata yet an epidermis that is substantially isolated from the 245
mesophyll (Jewer et al., 1982). We observed a significant decline in the proportion of ABA in the 246
adaxial epidermis when plants were exposed to increased VPD, suggesting that guard cell ABA 247
synthesis in response to increased VPD is substantially dwarfed by the accumulation of ABA 248
occurring in the remainder of the leaf (see Supplementary Fig. S2 for mass normalised ABA levels in 249
the leaf and epidermis). This concurs with a number of studies which show that the vascular tissue, 250
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on May 4, 2021. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
particularly the phloem cells, have the genetic capacity to synthesise ABA, as well as proteins 251
capable of transporting ABA to the guard cells (Koiwai et al., 2004; Okamoto et al., 2009; Kuromori 252
et al., 2010; Seo and Koshiba, 2011; Kuromori et al., 2014). We also found evidence that ABA can be 253
transported from major sites of synthesis in the leaf to the epidermis even in a pea mutant where 254
much of the normal liquid pathway for ABA flow between the vasculature and stomata is air-filled 255
(Fig. 7d). In this mutant we observed a delayed increase in ABA accumulation in the abaxial 256
epidermis in response to an increase in VPD suggesting that the source of the epidermal ABA was 257
probably derived from other tissue in the leaf. While there is an abundance of molecular evidence 258
illustrating the biochemical capacity of guard cells to synthesise ABA (Christmann et al., 2005; 259
Okamoto et al., 2009; Bauer et al., 2013), ABA accumulation in the leaf during a VPD transition 260
occurs before levels increase in the epidermis or guard cells. These findings suggest that ABA 261
synthesised by the leaf only, yet outside of the guard cells, may be the dominant signal for stomatal 262
closure in response to changes in VPD. Using ABA signalling mutants it has been suggested that 263
increases in ABA level in the xylem sap can cause a reduction in leaf hydraulic conductivity (Kleaf) and 264
stomatal closure in the absence of stomatal sensitivity to ABA (Pantin et al., 2013). This study 265
suggests that foliar increases in ABA in response to increased VPD may lead to a hydraulically driven 266
reduction in gs as well as hysteresis in the stomatal response to VPD. We found only a very small 267
(<10%) mean reduction in Kleaf (from evaporation and Ψl data) in the two angiosperm herb species 268
after VPD was returned to 0.7 kPa that would not be sufficient to cause the >50% reduction in gs. 269
Contribution of an ancestral, passive-hydraulic regulation of stomatal responses to VPD in 270
angiosperms 271
Foliar ABA level was able to account for the stomatal response to VPD, including the reduced rate of 272
stomatal re-opening after returning to low VPD in three angiosperm species; however, this was not 273
the case in the woody angiosperm species Q. robur. The small increase in ABA level in response to 274
the VPD transition, as well as the similar rate of the recovery of gs in this species suggests that the 275
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on May 4, 2021. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
ancestral, passive-hydraulic regulation of stomatal response to VPD remains a significant influence 276
over stomatal aperture in some angiosperm species. Whether this is also the case in angiosperm 277
species during stomatal responses to very gradual transitions in VPD, which may not be severe 278
enough to trigger ABA biosynthesis, remains to be tested. However, the presence of the ancestral, 279
passive-hydraulic regulation of stomatal responses to VPD, is supported by gas exchange studies in 280
the single-gene ABA signalling and synthesis mutants of Arabidopsis all of which still show a degree 281
of stomatal response to both increasing and decreasing VPD (Assmann et al., 2000; Xie et al., 2006). 282
This had been attributed to an as yet unknown metabolic stomatal signal (Xie et al., 2006); however 283
it appears more likely that this partial response in the absence of a stomatal ABA signal is also due to 284
passive-hydraulic regulation of stomatal response to VPD in Arabidopsis. 285
Interestingly, a significant efflux of potassium ions from the guard cells of the ABA-biosynthetic 286
mutant, aba3, has been observed following a decrease in relative humidity (Bauer et al., 2013). This 287
efflux of potassium ions in mutant plants exceeded that of wild-type plants; however neither 288
stomatal aperture nor gs was measured in this study. This observation further suggests that ABA 289
alone is not entirely responsible for stomatal responses to VPD in angiosperms, and highlights the 290
importance of further investigation into the stomatal responses of ABA signalling and synthesis 291
mutants to understand the relative importance of both mechanisms in delivering normal stomatal 292
responses to changes in VPD in angiosperms. 293
A fundamental unanswered question remains as to what the selective advantage for evolving ABA-294
dependent stomatal responses to VPD is. This may lie in the similar selective advantages obtained 295
by the evolution of additional active stomatal control mechanisms across the vascular land plant 296
lineages (including a response to blue light (Doi et al., 2008), photosynthetic signalling from the 297
mesophyll (McAdam and Brodribb, 2012) and ABA (Brodribb and McAdam, 2011; cf. Ruszala et al., 298
2011) in seed plants, as well as a response to low CO2 in the dark (Doi and Shimazaki, 2008) and high 299
CO2 in the light (Brodribb et al., 2009), possibly due to calcium signalling in the stomata, which 300
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on May 4, 2021. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
appears to be unique to angiosperms (Brodribb and McAdam, 2013). The evolution of these 301
additional stomatal control mechanisms over the course of the last 400 million years has greatly 302
enhanced the environmental signals that stomata can perceive and respond to (McAdam and 303
Brodribb, 2012). This increased the complexity in the regulation of stomatal control mirrors the 304
increasing ecological success of progressive lineages of vascular land plants. 305
Conclusion 306
We show that the earliest response of stomata to VPD was a passive-hydraulic response that does 307
not require foliar ABA, this response is currently found in the extant relatives of basal vascular land 308
plants, including the lycophytes, ferns and gymnosperms. However, a transition to an ABA 309
regulation of the VPD response appears to have evolved very early in the angiosperm clade, as 310
evidenced by the ABA dependence of the stomatal response to VPD in the most basal extant 311
angiosperm, Amborella trichopoda. We provide evidence that bulk leaf ABA provides the signal for 312
active stomatal responses to VPD in angiosperms. 313
Materials and Methods 314
Plant material and experimental conditions 315
Potted individuals of three morphologically and ecologically diverse fern species including the 316
terrestrial species Pteridium esculentum [Dennsteadiatace], semi-aquatic Marsilea hirsuta 317
[Marsileaceae] and epiphyte Pyrrosia lingua [Polypodiaceae], the conifers Metasequoia 318
glyptostroboides [Cupressaceae], Pinus caribaea var. hondurensis [Pinaceae] and Prumnopitys ladei 319
[Podocarpaceae], woody angiosperms Amborella trichopoda [Amborellaceae] and Quercus robur 320
[Fagaceae] and herbaceous angiosperms Pisum sativum ‘Argenteum’ [Fabaceae] and Dahlia hybrida 321
‘Cinderella’ [Asteraceae] were used in this study. Plants were grown under controlled glasshouse 322
conditions of 25°C/16°C day/night temperatures and 16 h photoperiod, with natural light 323
supplemented by sodium vapour lamps to ensure a minimum 300 μmol quanta m -2 s-1 at the pot 324
surface. All plants received weekly applications of liquid fertilizer (Aquasol, Hortico Ltd). Single 325
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on May 4, 2021. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
individuals of the fern, conifer and woody angiosperm species, or five even-aged individuals of the 326
herbaceous angiosperm species (due to a limited number of leaves per plant), were placed in a 327
growth cabinet (PGC-105, Percival Scientific Inc.) to acclimate for a week prior to experimentation. 328
The temperature and photoperiod conditions in the growth cabinet were maintained the same as in 329
the glasshouse (25°C/16°C day/night temperatures and 16 h photoperiod provided by mixed 330
incandescent and fluorescent lights ensuring a minimum 300 μmol quanta m-2
s-1
at the pot surface). 331
During this acclimation period, however, a daytime VPD of 0.7 kPa (77% relative humidity) was 332
sustained by the presence of containers of water and a 1 m2 surface of wet hessian; temperature 333
and relative humidity were monitored every five min during this period by a data logger (HOBO Pro 334
Series, Onset). Following a week of acclimation, the simultaneous monitoring of leaf gas exchange, 335
water potential (Ψl) and ABA levels were carried out approximately every 15 min (as described 336
below), during a relatively fast, step change in VPD. After an initial simultaneous measurement of 337
leaf gas exchange, Ψl, and ABA level, VPD was increased to 1.5 kPa (42% relative humidity) using a 338
condensing dehumidifier (SeccoUltra 00563, Olimpia-Splendid) in the growth cabinet. Temperature 339
and relative humidity were monitored every 30 s during the experimental period by a humidity 340
probe (HMP45AC, Vaisala) and temperature thermocouple connected to a data logger (CR10X, 341
Campbell Scientific). A VPD of 1.5 kPa was maintained until leaf gas exchange had stabilised (60-90 342
minutes), VPD was then returned to 0.7 kPa and maintained until leaf gas exchange had again 343
stabilised. The relatively small and contained volume of air in the growth cabinet (3 m3) resulted in a 344
relatively fast half time for the VPD transition of 150 s following transitions between 0.7 and 1.5 kPa 345
(with no hysteresis when VPD was returned to 0.7 kPa). 346
Leaf gas exchange and water potential measurements 347
During transitions in VPD, leaf gas exchange in three even-aged, fully irradiated leaves was measured 348
approximately every 15 mins using an infrared gas analyser (LI-6400, LI-COR Biosciences). Conditions 349
in the leaf cuvette were maintained as close as possible to the conditions in the growth cabinet, with 350
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on May 4, 2021. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
VPD regulated by a portable dew point generator (LI-610, LI-COR Biosciences). Leaves were enclosed 351
in the cuvette and instantaneous gas exchange was logged following stability in cuvette conditions 352
(after approximately 30 s). Following gas exchange measurements, the same leaf was then excised 353
and immediately sampled for ABA quantification (see below). In the fern species P. esculentum, 6 354
cm2 of leaf material could not be contained in the leaf cuvette due to the pinnate nature of the 355
leaves; the same three pinnules were, therefore, measured over the course of the experiment and 356
neighbouring tissue was sampled for foliar ABA quantification, after which leaf gas exchange was 357
adjusted for leaf area in the cuvette. 358
Leaf water potentials were assessed in three leaves at each equilibrium point before and after VPD 359
transitions. Leaves were harvested and immediately wrapped first in damp paper towel, then 360
aluminium foil, and bagged for assessment of Ψ l using a Scholander pressure chamber and 361
microscope to precisely measure the balance pressure. 362
ABA collection, extraction, purification and quantification 363
In all species, except the angiosperm herb P. sativum, samples harvested for ABA quantification 364
were immediately weighed (±0.0001 g, MS204S, Mettler-Toledo) into 50 ml tubes, covered in 365
approximately 15 ml of cold (0°C) 80% methanol in water (v v -1) with 250 g/L (m v-1) of added 366
butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) and transferred to -20°C. Foliar ABA levels in these samples were 367
extracted, purified and quantified by physicochemical methods using an added internal standard and 368
UPLC-MS according to the methods of McAdam and Brodribb (2014). 369
Testing the origin of the ABA increase in the leaf 370
To test whether the increase in foliar ABA level observed in angiosperm species was due to 371
endogenous synthesis of ABA in the leaf or an enhanced delivery of ABA from the xylem sap because 372
of an increase in evaporation we measured foliar ABA level and gs in branches of A. trichopoda 373
excised under water. Three branches (with approximately 7 leaves) were selected from the same 374
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on May 4, 2021. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
plant used in the earlier experiments and excised under filtered, degassed water. Branches were 375
acclimated to the growth chamber in which experiments were conducted (described above) for 24 376
hours to ensure that ABA levels in the xylem sap were reduced. After this time the branches were 377
exposed to the above described transition in VPD. Foliar ABA and gs were measured simultaneously 378
in a single leaf from each branch, after 20 mins of exposure to a VPD of 1.5 kPa, then again after the 379
VPD was lowered to 0.7 kPa after a further 20 mins. On completion of this experiment branches 380
were removed from the water and three branches of similar size were excised from the original 381
plant. The remaining leaves on each branch were excised and the branch was enclosed in a 382
Scholander pressure chamber and 1.5 MPa of pressure was applied to the branch. This pressure 383
exuded xylem sap and approximately 200 μl of sap was collected from each branch and ABA levels 384
were quantified as described above, after determining the exact volume of sap expressed. 385
Fractional distribution of ABA in the leaf 386
Both foliar ABA and abaxial epidermal ABA levels were measured in P. sativum. For these 387
experiments we used the Argenteum mutant of P. sativum as it has fully functional stomata, yet an 388
epidermis that is only attached to the mesophyll along major veins (Jewer et al., 1982). The isolated 389
epidermis of this mutant allowed for a rapid sampling of epidermal tissue from the same leaves in 390
which leaf gas exchange was measured. Abaxial epidermes were entirely removed in a single peel 391
and briskly placed in a 1.5 ml tube, weighed (±0.0001 g), covered in cold 80% methanol with added 392
BHT and transferred to -20°C (no more than 20 s elapsed from leaf excision to the covering of 393
epidermes in cold methanol solution). ABA level was quantified from the remainder of the leaf, 394
which was enclosed briefly (less than 30 s) in damp paper towel. This tissue was weighed in a similar 395
fashion, covered in cold 80% methanol with added BHT, and also transferred to -20°C. To each 1.5 396
ml tube, a single stainless steel ball bearing was added, along with 15 ng of internal standard 397
[2H6]ABA. Samples were then homogenised using a cell lyses machine (TissueLyser II, Qiagen) and 398
ABA extracted by storing samples overnight at 4°C, centrifuging for 5 min at 13000 rpm and drying 399
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on May 4, 2021. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
the supernatant to completeness under vacuum. For all samples, endogenous ABA was quantified 400
by UPLC-MS, according to the methods of McAdam and Brodribb (2014). Both mass normalised ABA 401
levels were determined from each sample (as described above) and, as the entire extract from each 402
sample was used to quantify ABA levels, the proportion of total foliar ABA found in the abaxial 403
epidermis was also determined from the raw UPLC-MS peak areas. Total foliar ABA was calculated 404
as the sum of peak areas from both the abaxial epidermal sample and remaining leaf tissue sample. 405
Transfer of [2H6]ABA from the transpiration stream to the epidermis in the Argenteum mutant of 406
Pisum sativum 407
To assess whether ABA synthesised in the leaf could be transported to the epidermis and influence 408
stomatal aperture, again we used the Argenteum mutant of P. sativum. Labelled [2H6]ABA was fed 409
into the transpiration stream of an Argenteum leaf through the stem excised under water while leaf 410
gas exchange was continuously monitored. The experimental plant was 15 days old with three fully 411
expanded leaves. The night prior to this experiment, the stem of the plant was excised under water 412
and maintained in the dark until the following morning. At 0830 h on the day of the experiment, the 413
most recent fully expanded leaf was enclosed in the cuvette of an infrared gas analyser (LI-6400, LI-414
COR Biosciences), environmental conditions in the cuvette were sustained for the duration of the 415
experiment under the following conditions: air temperature 22°C, light intensity 1000 μmol quanta 416
m-2
s-1
, and VPD regulated at 1.2 kPa (using a portable dew-point generator (LI-610, LI-COR 417
Biosciences)). When gs had reached a steady-state maximum for at least six min, background levels 418
of [2H6]ABA in the abaxial epidermis and in the leaf tissue were assessed in a neighbouring leaf, by 419
harvesting both tissues as described above. After this initial collection, [2H6]ABA was added to the 420
transpiration stream at a concentration of 1000 ng ml -1 (the cut stem was approximately 5 cm from 421
the lamina of the leaf in the cuvette). Leaf gas exchange was monitored until gs had declined and 422
reached stability after 35 min, following which the leaf in the cuvette was harvested for [2H6]ABA 423
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on May 4, 2021. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
quantification. [2H6]ABA levels were assessed in both the abaxial epidermis and remaining leaf 424
tissue, using the harvest, extraction, purification and quantification methods described above. 425
Stomatal sensitivities to exogenous ABA 426
In all species for which there was a systematic change in foliar ABA level during transitions in VPD, 427
one of two methods were used to assess the sensitivity of stomata to exogenously applied ABA. In 428
species that did not have pronounced hydropassive, wrong-way responses after excision under 429
water and in which epidermal peels or assessment of stomatal apertures by microscopy were not 430
possible in (the conifer species P. ladei and the woody angiosperm species Q. robur) stomatal 431
sensitivity to ABA was assessed in branches that were fed exogenous ABA as described by McAdam 432
and Brodribb (2014). Namely leaf gas exchange was measured (as described above) in three 433
branches that were excised under resin-filtered, deionized water. Leaves were equilibrated in the 434
leaf cuvette until maximum and stable gs was reached; then, an aliquot of concentrated exogenous 435
ABA, prepared by dissolving 90% crystalline ABA of mixed isomers (Sigma Chemical Co.) in 1 mL 436
methanol and then diluting up to 250 mL with resin-filtered, deionized water, was added to the leaf 437
water supply, increasing the concentration of ABA in the water to 2,500 ng mL. Periodically, as 438
stomata closed, short shoots (of P. ladei) or neighbouring leaves (of Q. robur) were taken from the 439
branch for foliar ABA quantification (see above). Each branch contributed at least five paired gs and 440
foliar ABA level data points. In the remaining species: the woody angiosperm A. trichopoda, and 441
herbaceous angiosperms D. hybrida and P. sativum, stomatal sensitivity to ABA was determined by 442
measuring the dose-dependent response of stomatal apertures (in viable guard cells from isolated 443
epidermis) to exogenous ABA. Both of these methods are known to accurately reflect stomatal 444
sensitivities ABA, having been both tested against each other (and found to correspond) as well 445
against the sensitivity of stomata to endogenously synthesised ABA (McAdam and Brodribb, 2014). 446
Epidermes were prepared as described by (Brodribb and McAdam, 2013). Following incubation in 447
the light (200 µmol quanta m-2 s-1) for 1 h in control buffer solution (50 mM KCl, 10 mM MES, 0.1 448
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on May 4, 2021. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
mM CaCl2, pH 6.15, rendered nominally CO2 free following 1 h of bubbling with N2 gas), at least two 449
epidermes were further incubated for 2 h in one of five increasing concentrations (0, 2, 20, 80 or 200 450
ng ml-1
) of exogenous ABA dissolved in the same buffer solution. Stomatal apertures (n=50 451
minimum) were then observed. Brodribb and McAdam (2013) describe the methods that were used 452
to prepare epidermes, assess guard cell viability and perform the double-blind measurements of 453
stomatal apertures. Stomatal conductance from measured stomatal apertures at each 454
concentration of ABA was calculated according to the formula given by Parlange and Waggoner 455
(1970). Stomatal length was determined from the same images used to quantify stomatal apertures. 456
Stomatal density was quantified from ten images taken at random at a magnification of x20 from the 457
epidermes used to quantify stomatal apertures. Stomatal pore depth was measured from leaf cross-458
sections of each species. To determine the relative importance of ABA-induced stomatal closure 459
during VPD transitions, empirical relationships between gs and exogenously applied foliar ABA level 460
were established for each species (Supplementary Figure S1), exponential decay functions were 461
fitted to these relationships to determine the foliar ABA level in the absence of water stress that 462
would be sufficient to result in the observed decline in gs during the VPD transition. For the conifer 463
species M. glyptostroboides the empirical relationship between gs and foliar ABA level was taken 464
from McAdam and Brodribb (2014). 465
466
Determining changes in the rates of stomatal responses to VPD 467
To provide a quantification of hysteresis observed during the response of stomata to a reversible 468
transition in VPD, comparisons were made between the slopes of linear regressions fitted to the 469
dynamic gs data collected from 15, 30 and 45 minutes following a transition in VPD. The percentage 470
change between the slope of stomatal closure compared to the slope of stomatal opening was 471
calculated for each species. Analysis of covariance was then used to compare the two linear 472
regressions using the AOV function in R (version 2.15.1). 473
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on May 4, 2021. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
474
Acknowledgements 475
We thank John Ross for his sage advice on the quantification of ABA levels; Jim Weller for the gift of 476
Argenteum seeds; Forestry Plantations Queensland for the gift of Pinus caribaea seeds; Noel Davies 477
and David Nichols for performing UPLC-MS analyses; Erin McAdam for statistical analyses; Samuel 478
Martins and Rachael Berry for technical assistance; Frances Sussmilch for photography; Chris Cooper 479
for helpful discussion; and three reviewers for insightful comments. 480
481
Literature Cited 482
Aliniaeifard S, Malcolm Matamoros P, van Meeteren U (2014) Stomatal malfunctioning under low 483
VPD conditions: induced by alterations in stomatal morphology and leaf anatomy or in the 484
ABA signaling? Physiologia Plantarum doi:10.1111/ppl.12216 485
Arve LE, Terfa MT, Gislerød HR, Olsen JE, Torre S (2013) High relative air humidity and continuous 486
light reduce stomata functionality by affecting the ABA regulation in rose leaves. Plant, Cell 487
& Environment 36: 382-392 488
Assmann SM, Snyder JA, Lee Y-RJ (2000) ABA-deficient (aba1) and ABA-insensitive (abi1-1, abi2-1) 489
mutants of Arabidopsis have a wild-type stomatal response to humidity. Plant Cell and 490
Environment 23: 387-395 491
Bauer H, Ache P, Lautner S, Fromm J, Hartung W, Al-Rasheid KAS, Sonnewald S, Sonnewald U, 492
Kneitz S, Lachmann N, Mendel RR, Bittner F, Hetherington AM, Hedrich R (2013) The 493
stomatal response to reduced relative humidity requires guard cell-autonomous ABA 494
synthesis. Current Biology 23: 53-57 495
Bauerle WL, Whitlow TH, Setter TL, Vermeylen FM (2004) Abscisic acid synthesis in Acer rubrum L. 496
leaves - a vapor-pressure-deficit-mediated response. Journal of the American Society for 497
Horticultural Science 129: 182-187 498
Brodribb TJ, McAdam SAM (2011) Passive origins of stomatal control in vascular plants. Science 331: 499
582-585 500
Brodribb TJ, McAdam SAM (2013) Abscisic acid mediates a divergence in the drought response of 501
two conifers. Plant Physiology 162: 1370-1377 502
Brodribb TJ, McAdam SAM (2013) Unique responsiveness of angiosperm stomata to elevated CO2 503
explained by calcium signalling. PLoS One 8: e82057 504
Brodribb TJ, McAdam SAM, Jordan GJ, Feild TS (2009) Evolution of stomatal responsiveness to CO2 505
and optimization of water-use efficiency among land plants. New Phytologist 183: 839-847 506
Buckley TN (2005) The control of stomata by water balance. New Phytologist 168: 275-292 507
Buckley TN, Mott KA, Farquhar GD (2003) A hydromechanical and biochemical model of stomatal 508
conductance. Plant, Cell & Environment 26: 1767-1785 509
Bunce JA (1997) Does transpiration control stomatal responses to water vapour pressure deficit? 510
Plant, Cell & Environment 20: 131-135 511
Chater C, Kamisugi Y, Movahedi M, Fleming A, Cuming AC, Gray JE, Beerling DJ (2011) Regulatory 512
mechanism controlling stomatal behavior conserved across 400 million years of land plant 513
evolution. Current Biology 21: 1025-1029 514
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on May 4, 2021. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Christmann A, Hoffmann T, Teplova I, Grill E, Müller A (2005) Generation of active pools of abscisic 515
acid revealed by in vivo imaging of water-stressed Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology 137: 209-516
219 517
Cohen JD, Bausher MG, Bialek K, Buta JG, Gocal GFW, Janzen LM, Pharis RP, Reed AN, Slovin JP 518
(1987) Comparison of a commercial ELISA assay for indole-3-acetic acid at several stages of 519
purification and analysis by gas chromatography-selected ion monitoring-mass spectrometry 520
using a 13
C6-labeled internal standard. Plant Physiology 84: 982-986 521
Damour G, Simonneau T, Cochard H, Urban L (2010) An overview of models of stomatal 522
conductance at the leaf level. Plant, Cell & Environment 33: 1419-1438 523
Darwin F (1898) Observations on stomata. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: 524
Biological Sciences 190: 531-621 525
Doi M, Shimazaki K (2008) The stomata of the fern Adiantum capillus-veneris do not respond to CO2 526
in the dark and open by photosynthesis in guard cells. Plant Physiology 147: 922-930 527
Doi M, Wada M, Shimazaki K (2008) The fern Adiantum capillus-veneris lacks stomatal responses to 528
blue light. Plant and Cell Physiology 47: 748-755 529
Farquhar GD (1978) Feedforward responses of stomata to humidity. Australian Journal of Plant 530
Physiology 5: 787-800 531
Franks PJ, Cowan IR, Farquhar GD (1997) The apparent feedforward response of stomata to air 532
vapour pressure deficit: information revealed by different experimental procedures with two 533
rainforest trees. Plant, Cell & Environment 20: 142-145 534
Franks PJ, Farquhar GD (1999) A relationship between humidity response, growth form and 535
photosynthetic operating point in C3 plants. Plant, Cell & Environment 22: 1337-1349 536
Franks PJ, Farquhar GD (2007) The mechanical diversity of stomata and its significance in gas-537
exchange control. Plant Physiology 143: 78-87 538
Gesquiere LR, Ziegler TE, Chen PA, Epstein KA, Alberts SC, Altmann J (2014) Measuring fecal 539
testosterone in females and fecal estrogens in males: Comparison of RIA and LC/MS/MS 540
methods for wild baboons (Papio cynocephalus). General and Comparative Endocrinology 541
204: 141-149 542
Giday H, Fanourakis D, Kjaer KH, Fomsgaard IS, Ottosen C-O (2013) Foliar abscisic acid content 543
underlies genotypic variation in stomatal responsiveness after growth at high relative air 544
humidity. Annals of Botany 112: 1857-1867 545
Harris MJ, Outlaw WH (1991) Rapid adjustment of guard-cell abscisic acid levels to current leaf-546
water status. Plant Physiology 95: 171-173 547
Harris MJ, Outlaw WH, Mertens Rd, Weiler EW (1988) Water-stress-induced changes in the abscisic 548
acid content of guard cells and other cells of Vicia faba L. leaves as determined by enzyme-549
amplified immunoassay. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 85: 2584-2588 550
Heath OVS (1938) An experimental investigation of the mechanism of stomatal movement, with 551
some preliminary observations upon the response of the guard cells to “shock”. New 552
Phytologist 37: 385-395 553
Jewer PC, Incoll LD, Shaw J (1982) Stomatal responses of Argenteum - a mutant of Pisum sativum L. 554
with readily detachable leaf epidermis. Planta 155: 146-153 555
Katul GG, Palmroth S, Oren RAM (2009) Leaf stomatal responses to vapour pressure deficit under 556
current and CO2-enriched atmosphere explained by the economics of gas exchange. Plant, 557
Cell & Environment 32: 968-979 558
Koiwai H, Nakaminami K, Seo M, Mitsuhashi W, Toyomasu T, Koshiba T (2004) Tissue-specific 559
localization of an abscisic acid biosynthetic enzyme, AAO3, in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology 560
134: 1697-1707 561
Kuromori T, Miyaji T, Yabuuchi H, Shimizu H, Sugimoto E, Kamiya A, Moriyama Y, Shinozaki K 562
(2010) ABC transporter AtABCG25 is involved in abscisic acid transport and responses. 563
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107: 2361-2366 564
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on May 4, 2021. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Kuromori T, Sugimoto E, Shinozaki K (2014) Intertissue signal transfer of abscisic acid from vascular 565
cells to guard cells. Plant Physiology 164: 1587-1592 566
Lange OL, Lösch R, Schulze ED, Kappen L (1971) Responses of stomata to changes in humidity. 567
Planta 100: 76-86 568
McAdam SAM, Brodribb TJ (2012) Fern and lycophtye guard cells do not respond to endogenous 569
abscisic acid. The Plant Cell 24: 1510-1521 570
McAdam SAM, Brodribb TJ (2012) Stomatal innovation and the rise of seed plants. Ecology Letters 571
15: 1-8 572
McAdam SAM, Brodribb TJ (2014) Separating active and passive influences on stomatal control of 573
transpiration. Plant Physiology 164: 1578-1586 574
Medlyn BE, Duursma RA, Eamus D, Ellsworth DS, Prentice IC, Barton CVM, Crous KY, De Angelis P, 575
Freeman M, Wingate L (2011) Reconciling the optimal and empirical approaches to 576
modelling stomatal conductance. Global Change Biology 17: 2134-2144 577
Mott KA, Denne F, Powell J (1997) Interactions among stomata in response to perturbations in 578
humidity. Plant, Cell and Environ 20: 1098-1107 579
Mott KA, Peak D (2013) Testing a vapour-phase model of stomatal responses to humidity. Plant, Cell 580
& Environment 36: 936-944 581
Ocheltree TW, Nippert JB, Prasad PVV (2014) Stomatal responses to changes in vapor pressure 582
deficit reflect tissue-specific differences in hydraulic conductance. Plant, Cell & Environment 583
37: 132-139 584
Okamoto M, Tanaka Y, Abrams SR, Kamiya Y, Seki M, Nambara E (2009) High humidity induces 585
abscisic acid 8'-hydroxylase in stomata and vasculature to regulate local and systemic 586
abscisic acid responses in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology 149: 825-834 587
Oren R, Sperry JS, Katul GG, Pataki DE, Ewers BE, Phillips N, Schäfer KVR (1999) Survey and 588
synthesis of intra- and interspecific variation in stomatal sensitivity to vapour pressure 589
deficit. Plant, Cell & Environment 22: 1515-1526 590
Pantin F, Monnet F, Jannaud D, Costa JM, Renaud J, Muller B, Simonneau T, Genty B (2013) The 591
dual effect of abscisic acid on stomata. New Phytologist 197: 65-72 592
Pantin F, Renaud J, Barbier F, Vavasseur A, Le Thiec D, Rose C, Bariac T, Casson S, McLachlan 593
Deirdre H, Hetherington Alistair M, Muller B, Simonneau T (2013) Developmental Priming 594
of Stomatal Sensitivity to Abscisic Acid by Leaf Microclimate. Current Biology 23: 1805-1811 595
Parlange J-Y, Waggoner PE (1970) Stomatal dimensions and resistance to diffusion. Plant Physiology 596
46: 337-343 597
Pierce M, Raschke K (1980) Correlation between loss of turgor and accumulation of abscisic acid in 598
detached leaves. Planta 148: 174-182 599
Ruszala EM, Beerling DJ, Franks PJ, Chater C, Casson SA, Gray JE, Hetherington AM (2011) Land 600
plants acquired active stomatal control early in their evolutionary history. Current Biology 601
21: 1030-1035 602
Seo M, Koshiba T (2011) Transport of ABA from the site of biosynthesis to the site of action. Journal 603
of Plant Research 124: 501-507 604
Tardieu F, Simonneau T (1998) Variability among species of stomatal control under fluctuating soil 605
water status and evaporative demand: modelling isohydric and anisohydric behaviours. 606
Journal of Experimental Botany 49: 419-432 607
Trejo CL, Davies WJ (1991) Drought-induced closure of Phaseolus vulgaris L. stomata precedes leaf 608
water deficit and any Increase in xylem ABA concentration. Journal of Experimental Botany 609
42: 1507-1516 610
Turner NC, Schulze ED, Gollan T (1984) The responses of stomata and leaf gas exchange to vapour 611
pressure deficits and soil water content. I. Species comparisons at high soil water content. 612
Oecologia 63: 338-342 613
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on May 4, 2021. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Waadt R, Hitomi K, Nishimura N, Hitomi C, Adams SR, Getzoff ED, Schroeder JI, Amasino R (2014) 614
FRET-based reporters for the direct visualization of abscisic acid concentration changes and 615
distribution in Arabidopsis. eLife 3: e01739 616
Walker-Simmons MK, Rose PA, Hogge LR, Abrams SR (2000) Abscisic Acid. In GA Tucker, JA Roberts, 617
eds, Plant Hormone Protocols, Vol 141. Humana Press, pp 33-47 618
Wilkinson S, Davies WJ (1997) Xylem sap pH increase: A drought signal received at the apoplastic 619
face of the guard cell that involves the suppression of saturable abscisic acid uptake by the 620
epidermal symplast. Plant Physiology 113: 559-573 621
Xie X, Wang Y, Williamson L, Holroyd GH, Tagliavia C, Murchie E, Theobald J, Knight MR, Davies 622
WJ, Leyser HMO, Hetherington AM (2006) The identification of genes involved in the 623
stomatal response to reduced atmospheric relative humidity. Current Biology 16: 882-887 624
625
626
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on May 4, 2021. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Figure Legends 627
628
Figure 1. Trajectories of stomatal conductance (gs, black circles, n=3 leaves, ±SE) and foliar ABA level 629
(white circles, n=3, ±SE) taken from the same leaves, as plants from four angiosperm species were 630
exposed to a reversible sequence of VPD transitions from 0.7 kPa (blue) to 1.5 kPa (green) and 631
returning to 0.7 kPa (blue). In all species the exogenously applied ABA level known to induce a 632
similar reduction in gs as what was observed at 1.5 kPa is presented as a red horizontal line (see Fig. 633
3). 634
Figure 2. Trajectories of stomatal conductance (gs, black circles, n=3 leaves, ±SE) and foliar ABA level 635
(white circles, n=3, ±SE) taken from the same leaves, as plants from three conifer species were 636
exposed to a reversible sequence of VPD transitions from 0.7 kPa (blue) to 1.5 kPa (green) and 637
returning to 0.7 kPa (blue). In all species for which an increase in foliar ABA level was observed at 638
1.5 kPa, the exogenously applied ABA level known to induce a similar reduction in gs as what was 639
observed at 1.5 kPa is presented as a red horizontal line (see Fig. 3). 640
Figure 3. Trajectories of stomatal conductance (gs, black circles, n=3 leaves, ±SE) and foliar ABA level 641
(white circles, n=3, ±SE) taken from the same leaves (except in Pteridium esculentum), as plants from 642
three fern species were exposed to a reversible sequence of VPD transitions from 0.7 kPa (blue) to 643
1.5 kPa (green) and returning to 0.7 kPa (blue). 644
Figure 4. The percentage change in the rate of stomatal response to VPD between the closing 645
response of stomata following a transition from 0.7 to 1.5 kPa with stomatal opening on returning to 646
0.7 kPa. Stars denote significant differences between the slopes of linear regressions (n.s. not 647
significant, ** 0.02 > P > 0.01, *** 0.01 > P). The percentage change in the rate of the stomatal 648
response to VPD in Quercus robur was almost significant (P=0.052) reflecting the increase in foliar 649
ABA at a VPD of 1.5 kPa to a level that did not quite reach the threshold for stomatal closure (see 650
Fig. 1). 651
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on May 4, 2021. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Figure 5. The response of stomatal conductance (gs) to exogenously applied ABA with fitted three 652
parameter exponential decay functions (black lines). In three species gs values were calculated from 653
stomatal aperture dimensions of isolated epidermis incubated at various ABA concentrations (A to C, 654
insert depicts stomatal aperture measurements of n=50 viable stomata, ±SE), while in two species 655
the sensitivity of stomata to ABA was assessed in hydrated branches in which gs was monitored 656
following the feeding of exogenous ABA into the transpiration stream (D and E). 657
658
Figure 6. Mean foliar ABA levels (A) and stomatal conductance (B) as three stems (± SE) of Amborella 659
trichopoda were exposed to a reversible transition in VPD from 0.7 kPa (blue, right bar) to 1.5 kPa 660
(green) and returning to 0.7 kPa (blue, left bar) for 20 min at each VPD. (C) The mean concentration 661
of ABA in the xylem sap of the three branches (± SE) taken from a plant grown under 0.7 kPa and the 662
three branches excised under water on completion of the experiment. 663
664
Figure 7. (A) The proportion of ABA from the whole leaf that is found in the abaxial epidermis (n=3, 665
±SE) and stomatal conductance (gs, red line taken from Fig. 1) during a sequence of VPD transitions 666
from 0.7 kPa (blue) to 1.5 kPa (green) and returning to 0.7 kPa (blue) in the Argenteum mutant of 667
the herbaceous angiosperm Pisum sativum. (B) A comparison between the mass normalised foliar 668
ABA level and abaxial epidermal ABA level from the same leaves (taken from Supplementary Fig. S2) 669
following a step-increase in VPD from 0.7 kPa to 1.5 kPa, times of sampling are shown, the red line 670
represents a fitted linear regression while the black line a 1:1 relationship between the two mass 671
normalised ABA levels (the two regressions are significantly different, P=0.0018). See 672
Supplementary Fig. S1 for ABA levels plotted over time. (C) The distinctive foliar morphology of the 673
Argenteum mutant (right) in comparison to a wild-type leaflet (left), the silvery colouring is due to a 674
large air space between the epidermis and mesophyll (scale bar = 1 cm). (d) The response of gs in a 675
leaf of the Argenteum mutant excised under water and fed labelled [2H6]ABA into the transpiration 676
stream (dashed red line). Chromatograms from UPLC-MS analyses of the [2H6]ABA channel (m/z 677
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on May 4, 2021. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
269.2 to 159.1) with peaks from leaf tissue (green) and abaxial epidermal tissue (blue) prior to and 678
after feeding (denoted by arrows, peaks are relative to sample mass, red stars indicate the retention 679
time for [2H6]ABA). 680
681
Table 682
683
Table 1. The leaf water potentials (MPa, n=3, ±SE) at each equilibrium point before and after VPD 684
transitions in all sampled species. 685
686 Group Species Ψl Initial 0.7 kPa Ψl
1.5 kPa
Ψl Final 0.7
kPa
Fern Pteridium esculentum -0.32 ±0.04 -0.67 ±0.02 -0.32 ±0.05
Fern Marsilea hirsuta -0.17 ±0.04 -0.58 ±0.04 -0.26 ±0.06
Fern Pyrrosia lingua -0.61 ±0.06 -0.95 ±0.02 -0.71 ±0.03
Conifer Metasequoia glyptostroboides -0.4 ±0.04 -0.64 ±0.04 -0.41 ±0.03
Conifer Prumnopitys ladei -0.63 ±0.04 -1.05 ±0.1 -0.67 ±0.01
Conifer Pinus caribaea -0.36 ±0.05 -0.56 ±0.03 -0.37 ±0.04
Woody angiosperm Amborella trichopoda -0.38 ±0.02 -0.7 ±0.01 -0.36 ±0.03
Woody angiosperm Quercus robur -0.36 ±0.02 -0.39 ±0.02 -0.35 ±0.01
Herbaceous angiosperm Dahlia hydrida -0.4 ±0.01 -0.7 ±0.04 -0.3 ±0.04
Herbaceous angiosperm Pisum sativum -0.3 ±0.02 -0.42 ±0.01 -0.12 ±0.01
687
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on May 4, 2021. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on May 4, 2021. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on May 4, 2021. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on May 4, 2021. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on May 4, 2021. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on May 4, 2021. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on May 4, 2021. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on May 4, 2021. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.