plant design ii guidelines (may 2015)
DESCRIPTION
pdpTRANSCRIPT
` fH
GUIDELINES
CCB 4023 Plant Design II
FOR
SUPERVISORS AND STUDENTS
May 2015 Semester
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING PROGRAMME
UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI PETRONAS
32610 Bandar Sri Iskandar, Perak Darul Ridzuan, Malaysia
Tel: (05) 3687565 Fax: (05) 3656176
Doc. Ref. No. : UTP-ACA-PROG-PD-2
Issue Version : 2.1
Date : May, 2015
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION 1
2.0 OBJECTIVES 1
3.0 OUTCOMES 1
4.0 SCOPES 2
5.0 DURATION 2
6.0 RESPONSIBILITIES 2
6.1 Students 2
6.2 Plant Design Project Coordinator (PDPC) 3
6.3 Committee of Supervisors 4
7.0 PROCESS FLOW OF PDP II 4
8.0 FINAL REPORT 6
8.1 Format 6
8.2 Contents 9
9.0 PRESENTATIONS 18
9.1 Final Oral Presentation 18
10.0 RESOURCES AND SERVICE REQUIREMENTS 18
11.0 ASSESSMENT METHOD 19
12.0 GRADING SCHEME 19
12.1 Final Report 19
12.2 Final Oral Presentation 19
12.3 Individual Progress Performance 19
12.4 C-Factor 20
12.5 Peer Review 20
12.6 UTP Grading Scheme 20
13.0 REFERENCES 21
14.0 APPENDICES 22
Appendix I : Proposed Design Milestone 23
Appendix II : Sample title page and side labeling 24
Appendix III : Sample certification of approval 27
Appendix IV : Form PDP II-1 Requisition form 28
Appendix V : Evaluation Forms 29
1
1.0 INTRODUCTION
As a continuation from Plant Design I (FYDP-I), the students need to complete Plant
Design II (FYDP-II) which carries 3 credit hours. This guideline specifically
addresses the necessary information for students/supervisors in carrying out their
duties for Plant Design II in UTP.
2.0 OBJECTIVES
The main objective of PDP II is to train/develop students in the application of all the
elements of knowledge and skills that have been accumulated throughout the
undergraduate program for solving design related problems for typical process
industrial plant. The second objective of the course is to develop the skills of working
in a team and to nurture leadership qualities. Written and oral communication skills as
well as the capability in decision making are also nurtured by the project.
3.0 OUTCOMES
At the end of this course, students should be able to:
Demonstrate their chemical engineering skills and knowledge in a detailed
design of a chemical plant.
Generate cost effective process options while maintaining operability, safety and
environment friendliness of the design.
Apply appropriate design codes in a detailed design work.
Develop a piping and instrumentation diagram (P&ID) and control strategy
package.
Prepare detailed economic evaluation of the proposed chemical plant.
Communicate and organize design group as an effective team member.
2
4.0 SCOPES OF WORK
The scopes of work for FYDP II are as follows:
Making the necessary decisions, judgements and assumptions in design
problems.
Performing the instrumentation and control study.
Performing the process design of the major process units.
Performing the mechanical design of the major process units.
Performing the economic evaluation including capital cost estimation and
manufacturing cost estimation.
Considering the environmental and safety issues related to the plant. Material
safety data sheet (MSDS) for all the chemicals involved must be part of the
safety and environmental discussion.
Utilising the blend of hand calculations, spreadsheets, mathematical computer
packages, and process simulators to design a process.
Preparing the group and individual reports as per standard format and
conducting the oral presentations.
5.0 DURATION
PDP II carries 3 credit hours and students are expected to accomplish their project in
14 weeks during the second semester of their final year. A proposed Gantt chart of
PDP II can be found in Appendix I.
6.0 RESPONSIBILITIES
6.1 Students
Students must make their own initiative and able to work in a team in bringing the
project to completion. Students will also be required to exercise teamwork spirit and
job co-ordination during undertaking the design project. The students may elect one
of their team members as the group leader. Among the expected responsibilities are as
listed below:
3
Obtaining information and material rightfully and honestly. Plagiarism will
cause serious consequences.
Seeking advice and guidance from supervisors when necessary.
Maintaining good discipline and personal conduct when searching for relevant
information especially when out of campus.
Preparing themselves against any failure such as work lost due to computer
crashes.
Preparing a logbook for each member and maintain a good record of individual
activity and progress.
Undertaking the detailed design of at least one unit operation per person.
Submitting all reports on time as specified by plant design project coordinator.
Giving/putting significant individual contribution or effort towards the
completion of the group task.
Failure to take the above responsibility/responsibilities may lead to failing the course.
6.2 Plant Design Project Coordinator (PDPC)
Head of Department will appoint a Plant Design Coordinator (PDPC) and his/her
assistants to coordinate PDP II. The responsibilities of PDPC and his/her assistants
include:
Identifying and selecting design project title.
Dividing students into respective groups.
Assigning students to respective supervisors.
Planning and managing the schedule for PDP II course implementation.
Providing briefing on PDP II course requirements to lecturers and students.
Arranging special seminars in selected topics related to the project to give
additional skills to the students to complete the project.
Coordinating students' oral presentation.
Arranging external examiners from industry to participate in the assessment of
students' report and oral presentation.
Compiling and finalizing students' final scores for submission to examination
committee.
The assistants of PDPC will assist him/her in all the above activities.
4
6.3 Committee of Supervisors
The committee consists of a main and with not more than two assistant supervisors.
The responsibilities of the committee can be summarized as below:
Advising the students on the preparation of their design projects.
Arranging meeting with students periodically. The supervisors are expected to
meet their students once a week.
Monitoring students’ progress from time to time.
Assisting students in defining the problem involved accordingly.
Assigning the students to undertake individual detailed calculation of mass and
energy balance.
Reviewing and assessing the individual student progress.
Assessing reports and commenting on the work.
Delivering seminar lectures on some special topics if requested by the PDPC.
7.0 PROCESS FLOW OF PDP II
The first stage of PDP II is to design the best control systems for the entire plant
proposed in PDP I. At this stage, the students need to consider the safety aspects and
provide the MSDS for all the chemicals handled in the plant. The HAZOP analysis of
major equipment together with its associated piping and minor units must also be
performed. In addition, the students are also required to specify the waste treatment
facilities and utility systems, as well as perform the equipment sizing and costing
study for the plant before presenting their work in both the final oral presentation.
After making the necessary corrections based on the comments provided during the
final oral presentation, the students are required to submit their group report using the
ring file ABBA Lever Arch Folders (404 Standard). (This submission format is made
as a strict requirement to ensure uniformity and ease of document identification and
handling as well as to facilitate the later task of storing the design reports.). The final
stage is the detailed design of equipment. Each student is expected to perform a
detailed equipment design for one major equipment including the mechanical design
and to provide the specification sheets for two minor equipment. All the individual
works have to be compiled and submitted in another ABBA Lever Arch Folders (404
5
Standard). The process flow diagram of PDP II is shown in Figure 1 and the
corresponding Gantt chart can be found in Appendix I.
Process Design of Major Units
Finalized Mechanical Design of Major
Units
Specification of Minor Units
Instrumentation and Control
Safety and Loss Prevention
Waste Treatment
Process Economics & Cost Estimation
Group and Individual Report
Submission
Figure 1: Process flow diagram of PDP II
PDPII
Oral Presentation
6
8.0 FINAL REPORT
8.1 Format
8.1.1 Language
The report must be written in English Language.
8.1.2 Font and spacing
All text should be one and half spacing (Times New Roman regular font style, size
12) written on a white A4 paper on one side of each sheet. The following however
should be single spaced:
Foot notes
Tables and figures
8.1.3 Length
The length of report should be not less than 100 and not more than 200 pages.
Students are strongly encouraged to use brief and straightforward expressions and to
avoid the use of jargons as far as possible. The page limit for individual design report
is limited to 40 pages per student.
8.1.4 Numbering
All pages should be numbered in proper sequence from introduction to the end of the
report. Page number must be positioned at the bottom and centered.
8.1.5 Heading and Margin
Major headings, such as INTRODUCTION, should be capitals, bold and font size
14. Secondary headings such as Example should be in bold. The top, bottom, and
right margins are 1 inch except for the left margin, which is 1.3 inch.
8.1.6 Mathematical Text
Mathematical text must be spaced out; superscript and subscript must be clearly
shown. All equations, terms and symbols must be written in italic.
7
8.1.7 Tables and Figures
Tables and figures less than a page in size should be inserted into the text near the
point of reference. Tables should not be carried over to the next page. Margin limits
are the same as text full-page. All tables and figures should be numbered and
captioned consecutively. Table heading should be positioned at the top middle of each
table. The figure heading should be positioned at the bottom middle of each figure.
8.1.8 Bindings
The report must be properly presented in ABBA Lever Arch Folders (404 Standard).
Each group is required to submit two folders, i.e. group work folder and individual
work folder. Format of both group work and individual work folders are as follows:
i) Group Report
1) Title page
2) Certification – approval by main supervisor after he/she is satisfied with the
correction or amendment done by students
3) Acknowledgements
4) Executive summary – max of 4 pages + PFD. Contents should include:
a) Project summary: Briefly describe the project with information such
as:
b) Simple PFD in A3 size with major stream values
c) Material & energy balance highlights
d) Major equipment highlights with main dimensions displayed
e.g. Distillation column, Liquid extractor, reactor
e) Minor equipment highlights with brief specifications stipulated, e.g.,
heat exchangers & pumps
f) Highlights of:
Utilities
Waste treatment
Annual capacity/requirement
Main product
By product if any
Raw material 1
Raw material 2
8
Economic evaluation & costs
Plant location
Plant layout
5) Table of contents
6) List of tables, figures and appendixes
7) The report must be arranged according to:
CHAPTER 1 – INTRODUCTION
CHAPTER 2 – LITERATURE REVIEW
CHAPTER 3 – CONCEPTUAL DESIGN AND SYNTHESIS
CHAPTER 4 – INSTRUMENTATION & CONTROL
CHAPTER 5 – SAFETY & LOSS PREVENTION
CHAPTER 6 – WASTE TREATMENT
CHAPTER 7 – PROCESS ECONOMICS & COST ESTIMATION
8) Conclusion & Recommendation
9) References
10) Appendices
11) PFD size A1
12) P&ID size A1
13) Plant Layout size A3
ii) Individual Report
Every member of a group needs to perform:
1) ONE (1) detailed design of major equipment
2) TWO (2) minor equipment – in specification sheets
* each group is also required to submit the final design report (both group and
individual work folders) in soft copy preferably in compact disc (CD).
* segregate each chapter with a divider.
* use punch hole protection (reinforcing ring) for every page that you wish to
submit.
* always refer to the guidelines for details.
9
8.2 Contents of Group Report
8.2.1 Title Page
The title page should be set out in accordance with the attached specimen sheet in
Appendix II. The project title should be clearly and precisely defined as has been
assigned by the PDPC.
8.2.2 Certification
This section should be approved by supervisor after he/she is satisfied with the
correction or amendment done by the student. See Appendix III for specimen sheet.
8.2.3 Acknowledgements
Most design teams obtain considerable assistance and advice from supervisors,
industrial consultants, librarians, faculty and fellow students. This section provides an
opportunity to acknowledge their contributions with an expression of appreciation and
thanks.
8.2.4 Executive Summary
The students should highlight all the important features of the report from the
technical reasons for undertaking the study to the conclusion. Remember that most
readers only read the summaries of reports and every word counts. Avoid padding
phrases and phrases that refer to the reports.
8.2.5 Table of Contents
All sections in the report should be listed, including the page numbers on which they
begin. Hence, all pages in the report, without exception, must be numbered. Each
main section must begin with a new page.
10
8.2.6 Main Body
The main body of the report must be composed of the following chapters:
Chapter 1: Introduction
Background of the design project, problem statement, objectives, scopes of work.
Chapter 2: Literature Review
Carry out research to uncover the latest information on feed and product properties,
product price, market, summary of potential hazards based on previous accidents and
possible site locations that may lead to a more profitable design. Literature resources
include encyclopedias, handbooks, journals, reports, indexes and even World Wide
Web (Internet). Standard method for quoting must be implemented and standardize
throughout the report.
Chapter 3: Conceptual Process Design and Synthesis
This chapter should be prepared in consultation of or based on either Douglas’
hierarchical decomposition approach or the Onion Model or a combination of both.
1. Level 1: Process Operating Mode: Batch vs. Continuous
2. Level 2: Input–Output Structure of the Flowsheet
input refers to the raw material of the process and the feedstock that
contains the input raw material
output refers to the desired products
3. Level 3: Reactor Design and Reactor Network Synthesis
Decision 1. Reactor performance:
(a) reaction scheme for the chosen process routes
(b) reactor type (flow pattern model, i.e., whether batch reactor (BR)/
plug-flow reactor (PFR) or CSTR) and
(c) reactor network (selecting conversion that maximizes selectivity
(also check the economic potential))
11
Decision 2. Reactor operating conditions: (1) concentration, (2)
temperature, (3) pressure, (4) phase, (5) catalyst (inert (e.g.,
N2))
Decision 3. Reactor configuration: reactor volume (capacity of reactor i.e.,
input and output flowrates, orientation, and configuration;
some of the more common types of reactor configuration are:
tubular reactors
shell-and-tube reactors
stirred-tank reactors
fixed-bed catalytic reactors (uses catalyst)
fixed-bed noncatalytic reactors (does not use catalyst)
moving-bed catalytic reactors
fluidized-bed catalytic reactors
fluidized-bed noncatalytic reactors
kilns (e.g., used in the cement industry)
fermentor
4. Level 4: Separation System Synthesis
Decision 1. Types of separators: what type of suitable separators? (e.g.,
distillation, absorption, membrane)
Decision 2. Sequencing of separators (for homogeneous mixtures): how
are the separators arranged? (here in this course, we are
interested in sequencing of distillation columns)
Decision 3. Operating conditions: (a) temperature, (b) pressure, (c)
concentration, and (d) addition of extra components (although
undesirable)
5. Level 5: Heat Integration (Heat Exchanger Network; Heating and Cooling
Utilities):
Students are highly encouraged to use the software package SPRINT (Process
Integration Software Version 2.2 by Centre for Process Integration, University of
Manchester) to assist in the development of the heat exchanger network.
12
Chapter 4: Instrumentation & Control
A basic control strategy should be performed for each stage of the process. In the
report, a summary of control requirements, possible controlled and manipulated
variables must be presented in table form. A production flowrate control strategy must
be properly mentioned. No tuning or calculation is required.
In a Piping and Instrumentation Diagram (P&ID), draw all control loops (transmitter,
controller and final elements) for the control requirements discussed in the report. No
advanced control strategy is required unless the control requirement cannot be
achieved with basic feedback control. Appropriate description must be given if
advanced control strategy is to be used.
All process equipment should be drawn roughly in proportion and identified by
equipment number. All pipes must be properly numbered. Block valve must be drawn
in small size for equipment isolation. Symbols in all drawings must follow the
PETRONAS Technical Standard (PTS).
A complete Piping and Instrumentation Diagram must be generated by using software
such Microsoft® Visio (well-recommended) or AUTOCAD (less-recommended).
Chapter 5: Safety & Loss Prevention
5.1 Hazard and Operability Studies (HAZOP)
Carry out HAZOP assessment of the specific plant area in group as specified
by supervisors. The selection should be based on the process nodes that
contain highly hazardous materials and critical process conditions identified
during preliminary hazard study. Demonstrate the HAZOP study at least for
THREE (3) study nodes, in which the nodes must connect to ONE (1) major
equipment. An appropriate HAZOP worksheet and report must be produced.
13
5.2 Plant Layout
A simple but scaled plant layout arrangement for the plant should be drawn up
indicating access routes and safety appliances as well as storage / stock tanks,
silos etc. The siting criteria and layout of the plant should follow any Codes of
Practice and Industry Guidance. Students are required to provide relevant
justification/statement on the safety aspects of the plant layout.
Chapter 6: Waste Treatment
To ensure ethical and statutory requirements are fulfilled, pollution control and waste
disposal or treatment should be taken into account by referring to the process
flowsheet. All major waste must be properly identified and their flowrate and nature
(i.e., phase, characteristics, and compositions) must be defined. Appropriate
regulation limit must be stated and the treatment strategy should be proposed.
Explanation supported with basic flow diagram (or block flow diagram) that shows
the major equipment would be enough, without the need to include the auxiliary
equipment such as pumps. In other words, specific design is not required except for
sizing of the major equipment for the purpose of costing.
Chapter 7: Process Economics & Cost Estimation
Estimate capital items, operating costs and economic potential of the plant. Finally,
report the estimated return together with some recommendation as to the commercial
implications of the study. The Detailed Factorial Method with approximately 25%
accuracy must be used for detailed economic evaluation. Plant lifetime is fixed at 15
years.
(Note: Discussion needs to be included for every section starting from Chapter 3 to
Chapter 7. Explain the significance of the results, include comments and indicate
further developments.)
Conclusion & Recommendation
This section is important as it reflects the essence of the report. Hence, the highlights
from Introduction and Theory sections should be included. Do not repeat what has
been mentioned in the Discussion section.
14
References
All references including sources of physical data should be listed. The following
method of referencing must be followed. In the text, refer to the work by the last
name of the author followed by the year in brackets. If there are 2 authors give the last
name of both the authors. If there are more than 2 authors give the last name of the
first author followed by et.al. In the bibliography, list all the references in alphabetical
order of the last name of the first author. All the authors must be listed as shown in
the examples below, followed by year in bracket, the name of the article or book, the
name of the journal, volume number and page number. In the case of books, the name
of the book, edition and publisher should follow the name of the author and year. For
example:
Nozhevnikova et.al (1997) has discussed the methanogenesis reactions taking place in
natural environments. Abu-Absi and Actis (1999) gave a detailed description of
different reactions taking place in an anaerobic reactor. Metcalf and Eddy (1991)
discussed the operational aspects of anaerobic reactions. Otton (1998) has presented
results on anaerobic digestion in fluidised bed reactors. Adam (2000) gave some
interesting insights into the natural anaerobic processes.
Listing of these references is as shown below.
Abu-Absi N.R., and L.A.Actis (1999), Encyclopaedia of Bioprocess Technology: Fermentation, Bio
Catalysis and Bio Separation, Vol 1, John Wiley and Sons, New York.
Adam, D. (2000), Where There is Muck There is Gas, http://www.nature.com/nsu_pf/000420-1.html
(access date)
Metcalf. C and R. Eddy (1991), Wastewater Engineering: Treatment, Disposal and Reuse, 3rd Ed. Mc-
Graw Hill Inc, New York.
Nozhevnikova, A.N., C.Hollinger, A.Amman and A.J.B Zehnder (1997), Methanogenesis in Sediments
from Deep Lakes at Different Temperatures (2-70oC), Water Science and Technology, Vol 36, No 3,
pp 384-396.
Otton, V. (1998), Anaerobic Digestion in Fluidised Bed Reactor, Thesis, Institute National
Polytechnik, Grenoble.
15
Appendices
Lengthy calculations, figures, results from programming, derivation of design data,
etc. should be enclosed in the appendices. Students must provide a clear explanation
and the author name for each calculation.
All drawings must be drawn on the specific paper size as follows:
a) Process Flow Diagram : A1
b) Process and Instrumentation Diagram : A1
c) Individual Equipment : A3
d) Plant Layout : A3
Drawings (a), (b) and (d) should be included in the group work folder, whereas
drawing (c) in the individual work folder. All A1 and A3 drawings should be folded
and inserted in A4 sized plastic wallets, as part of the report.
8.3 Contents of Individual Report
Based on the specified input and output, each student is required to design ONE (1)
major and TWO (2) minor equipment.
The equipment selection must follow the guideline below:
1. All groups must have a detailed design for the following equipment if present in the
flowsheet.
Major equipment:
Reactor
Distillation column
Absorption column
Furnace
2. Only one student is allowed to undertake the detailed design for each equipment.
3. The rest of the group members must be assigned to conduct two of the following
equipment if available. The supervisor may propose to PDPC if there is other major
equipment that is not listed below for detailed design.
Minor equipment:
Extraction columns
Evaporator
Membrane Units
Cyclone
16
Filter
Cooling tower
Sedimentation tanks
4. If minor equipment is not available, students can conduct the detailed design of
major equipment provided it is not the same unit.
5. The individual detailed design should cater for thermal design and proper material
selection, and mechanical design in such that appropriate dimensional drawing and
complete specification sheet can be generated.
6. The rest of the equipment in the process flowsheet must be properly sized by the
group such that appropriate capital cost can be estimated. No drawing is required
for these items. However specification sheets must be provided for such units, each
student to prepare the specification sheets for two minor equipment units. The
minor units may include the following.
a. Pumps
b. Heat exchangers
c. Stirrers
d. Material conveying equipment
e. Size reduction equipment
f. Size separation equipment
g. Pollution control equipment like bag filters, electrostatic precipitators etc.
h. Waste water treatment equipment like, Sedimentation tanks, filters, ion
exchangers etc.
7. Groups may propose the responsibility of individual design. The proposal must be
approved by the supervisor.
There are six important requirements that must be fulfilled:
a) Process Design
From fundamental governing equations, carry out the process calculations to optimize
the design within specified constraints. If the design involves any assumptions, they
should be clearly stated and justified. Critical evaluation and limitations of the design
calculations, including computer methods should be included. Complete process
design calculations must be included.
b) Specification sheet
All design parameters and material selection must be properly presented in
appropriate specification sheet.
17
c) Mechanical design of the equipment
The mechanical design of the equipment should include thickness of the vessel from
pressure considerations, thickness of tall vertical vessels by combined load
calculations, design of flanges, specification of nozzles, skirts, and supports.
d) Dimensional drawing
Appropriate dimensional drawing must be generated to visualize the orientation and
configuration of the unit operation. All critical parameters that directly affect the
process must be properly shown. For example, tube pitch and arrangement for heat
exchangers must be shown. All nozzles orientation must be clearly depicted.
e) Operating procedure
A basic operating procedure on how to start-up, operate and shut down the unit
operation. The shutdown procedure must include the safety aspect for carrying out
major maintenance work for the equipment.
(f) Equipment costing
You may consider making use of the graphs in the excellent process economics
textbook by Peters, Timmerhaus, and West (2004) for equipment costing. Note that
this section should be duplicated in the separate chapter on the economic
evaluation and profitability analysis of your complete plant design.
This section will contribute 20% of the final report and will be counted as
individual mark. In this section, work load distribution among group members and
equipment summary must be properly presented. For each equipment, the sizing
calculation, specification sheet, drawings and operating procedure must be compiled
together in one A4 sized plastic wallet and appropriately attached as appendix. If there
are four group members, there shall be four separate plastic wallets that contain the
complete design documents (sizing calculations, spec-sheet, drawings, and
procedures) for the respective equipment. Evaluation will be conducted as per score
sheets in Appendix V.
18
9.0 PRESENTATIONS
9.1 Final Oral Presentation
This is the crucial part where students need to convince the panel on the effectiveness
and the workability/practicability of their proposed design. Students are advised to
complete their reports two weeks before the deadline and concentrate on the
presentation that is scheduled in Week 13. Presentation will be held in front of a panel
that consists of selected representatives from various fields of expertise. Each group
will be given 30 minutes for oral presentation and 30 minutes for question & answer
session. This provides sufficient time to:
introduce the design problem;
provide an overview of the proposed process (emphasising alternative designs
that were rejected);
discuss major sections of the proposed design by emphasising the strengths of
the design through: (a) the complete heat-integrated process flow diagram (PFD)
of the plant; (b) the complete piping and instrumentation diagram (P&ID) of the
plant; (c) the HAZOP analysis; (d) the design of the waste treatment facilities;
and other relevant aspects of the proposed design;
present the results of the economic analysis and discuss other considerations;
summarize the design and make recommendations.
Students who miss oral presentation will be given Grade F.
10.0 RESOURCES AND SERVICES REQUIREMENTS
Students are allowed to seek information or any sort of material needed for the project
at any institutions or other places. Application letters to Head of Programme should
be written by the students through the main supervisor. The main supervisor must fill-
up Form PDP-II (Appendix IV) and submit to PDPC together with the application
letter. All requisitions are subjected to approval of Head of Programme.
19
11.0 ASSESSMENT METHOD
At the end of the semester, all students’ work will be assessed and final grade will be
given. Table 1 summarizes the overall technique of assessment.
Table 1: Assessment Scheme
Assessment Stage
Examined by and % Contribution
Supervisor Expert
Panels
External
Examiner
Group
Mark
Individual
Mark
Final Report
(Group) 10 20 30
Final Report
(Individual) 10 10 20
Final Presentation
(Group) 10 20 30
Final Presentation
(Individual) 10 10
Individual Progress 10 10
C-Factor 0 – 1.0
Total 50 30 20 60% 40%
12.0 GRADING SCHEME
12.1 Final Report
Main Supervisor and Expert Panels will evaluate the final reports (both group and
individual work folders). The percentage accounted for is shown in Table 1.
12.2 Final Oral Presentation
There are two types of assessment in the final oral presentation, namely group and
individual assessments. The percentages accounted for are shown in Table 1. Score
sheets in Appendix V will be used.
12.3 Individual Progress Performance
Each group is required to conduct an official meeting once in every two weeks. The
first official meeting must be held in the first lecture week of the semester. The last
official meeting will be held on Week 13, which will constitute a total of SEVEN (7)
20
official meetings. Minutes of meeting (MOM) must be submitted to the main
supervisor within ONE (1) week after the meeting. Supervisors have to evaluate the
individual progress performance. Individual progress performance will contribute
10% of the overall individual marks. Students and supervisor may conduct additional
meetings as frequent as required.
12.4 C-Factor
C-factor is introduced to assess students on their contribution to the group work by the
supervisors. Supervisors can take the results from the peer review as a reference in
assessing the C-factor. The amount of the group mark that can be obtained by
individual is depending on the C-factor value that he/she gets.
12.5 Peer Review
Students get to evaluate among themselves through the peer review session by filling
up Form PDP II-3 (Appendix V) and return it to the Main Supervisor.
12.6 UTP Grading Scheme
The overall marks for PDP II will be finalized by PDPC after all the forms have been
completed by the examiners. The final grades will be given according to Table 2
below:
Table 2: UTP Grading Scheme
Score Grade Point
85 – 100
80 –84.9
75 – 79.9
65 – 74.9
55 – 64.9
50 – 54.9
45 – 49.9
40 – 44.9
0 – 39.9
A
A-
B+
B
C+
C
D+
D
F
4.00
3.75
3.50
3.00
2.50
2.00
1.50
1.00
0
21
13. REFERENCES
Peters, Max S., Klaus D. Timmerhaus, and Ronald E. West. Plant Design and
Economics for Chemical Engineers. 5th Ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2004.
22
APPENDICES
23
Appendix I
Proposed Design Milestone
Important Dates:
Deadline for Softcopy Report Submission: 27 July (Week 11)
Tentative Dates for Final Oral Presentation: 10-14 August (Week 13)
Deadline of Final Report (After Incorporating the Changes Suggested in Final Oral Presentation) Submission: 19 August (Week 14)
PLANT DESIGN II (CCB 4023):
May Semester 2015WEEK 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
ACTIVITY Date 18-May 25-May 01-Jun 08-Jun 15-Jun 22-Jun 29-Jun 06-Jul 13-Jul 20-Jul 27-Jul 03-Aug 10-Aug 17-Aug
Activities
Important Dates:
Deadline for Softcopy Report Submission: 27 July (Week 11)
Tentative Date for Final Oral Presentation: 10-14 August (Week 13)
Deadline of Final Report (After Incorporating the Changes Suggested
in Final Oral Presentation) Submission: 19 August (Week 14)
Fin
al R
ep
ort
Su
bm
issi
on
Soft
cop
y o
f R
ep
ort
Sub
mis
sio
n
Fin
al O
ral
Pre
sen
tati
on
Scaled Plant Layout
Economics Evaluation: Cost Accounting and Capital Cost Estimation
Annual Costs, Earnings, and Profitability Analysis
Finalised Presentation and Reports
Instrumentation and Control Strategy P&ID
Detailed Equipment Design (Individual)
Safety and Loss Prevention
Waste Treatment
24
Appendix II
CCB 4023
PLANT DESIGN II
TITLE
GROUP 1
ZAINAL ABIDIN HASSAN 10001
CHEAH SOON KIT 10002
GOVINDARAJOO SHANTI 10003
MICHEAL BALLACK 10004
NATASHA ZVEREVA 10005
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI PETRONAS
MAY 2015
25
Side labeling:
Group Report
CC
B 4
023 P
LA
NT
DE
SIG
N-II
SE
ME
ST
ER
MA
Y 2
01
5
DE
SIG
N O
F X
XX
XX
X P
RO
DU
CT
ION
PL
AN
T
GR
OU
P X
X
G
RO
UP
RE
PO
RT
26
Individual Report
CC
B 4
023 P
LA
NT
DE
SIG
N-II
SE
ME
ST
ER
MA
Y 2
01
5
DE
SIG
N O
F X
XX
XX
X P
RO
DU
CT
ION
PL
AN
T
GR
OU
P X
X
IN
DIV
IDU
AL
RE
PO
RT
27
Appendix III
CCB 4023 (Plant Design II)
PLANT DESIGN PROJECT
MAY SEMESTER (2015)
TITLE
GROUP XX
ZAINAL ABIDIN HASSAN 10001
CHEAH SOON KIT 10002
GOVINDARAJOO SHANTI 10003
MICHEAL BALLACK 10004
NATASHA ZVEREVA 10005
APPROVED BY,
____________________
(DR. ROSMAN ALWI)
DATE :
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI PETRONAS
28
Appendix IV
Doc. Ref. No. Issue Version Date
UTP-ACA-PROG-FYPDP-01.01 0 January 2010 Form PDP II-1
REQUISITION FORM
29
Appendix V
Form PDP II-2
Assessment of Individual Group Members by Supervisors and C-FACTOR
(To be completed by Supervisor)
Group No./Name:
Project Title:
ID Name
Individual Progress
(Maximum score 10)
C-factor
(Awarded)
Assessment scheme:
Average Score Scale
7 – 10 Above expectations
4 – 6 Meet expectations
1 – 3 Below expectations
Note: C-Factor Assessment Scheme
C-Factor Awarded Scale Criteria
1.0 Average - show contribution to the group work
- satisfactory progress on the group work
- attend the official meeting
0.7 Below
Average
- no/very little contribution to the group work
- no/ very little progress on the group work
- attend the official meeting
0 Poor - no contribution to the group work
- no progress on the group work
- not attending the meeting without valid reason
…………………………
(Signature)
Supervisor’s name: Date:
30
Form PDP II-3
PEER REVIEW
CONFIDENTIAL:
(To be completed by the students and submitted to the Supervisor)
Name:
Student ID:
Group No.:
Name of Team Member Evaluation* (maximum score: 10)
Overall Evaluation
(C1 + C2 + C3 + C4 + C5)/5
C1 C2 C3 C4 C5
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
*Criteria for evaluation:
C1: Attendance at group meetings
C2: Team work and cooperation
C3: Knowledge input to project
C4: Timely and correct completion of project
C5: Overall contribution to successful completion of project
Assessment scheme:
Average Score Scale
7 – 10 Above expectations
4 – 6 Meet expectations
1 – 3 Below expectations
Signature and name:
…………………………..
Date:
31
EVALUATION FORM PDP II – GROUP REPORT (OVERALL) FOR SUPERVISOR
(To be completed by Supervisor)
Group No: ______ Project Title:
Category Excellent
(A to A-)
Good
(B+ to B)
Average
(C+ to C)
Below Average
(D+ to D)
Failure
(F)
Marks
Executive summary (20)
Inclusion of :
Background of the
design project which
stated the problem
statement and project
specifications
Objectives and scope
of the design work
required
Brief mention on
findings
Brief conclusion
State clearly all the
important and relevant
specifications for the design
problem.
Specify the work performed
and all major decisions
made throughout the design
project tasks.
Complete brief report on
the findings and conclusion.
State clearly all the relevant
specifications for the design
problem.
Specify the work performed
and decisions made while
carrying out the design
project tasks.
Complete brief report on
the findings and conclusion.
State specifications for the
design problem to some
extent.
Specify the work performed
while carrying out the
design project tasks.
Incomplete report on the
findings and conclusion.
State insufficient or non-
relevant specifications for
the design problem.
Specify some of the work
performed while carrying
out the design project tasks.
Incomplete report on the
findings and conclusion.
Did not state sufficient or
relevant specifications for
the design problem.
Did not state sufficient or
relevant work performed
while carrying out the
design project tasks.
Did not state the findings
and conclusion.
(Marks: 16-20) (Marks: 13-15.9) (Marks: 10-12.9) (Marks: 8.0-9.9) (Marks: 0.0-7.9)
Form PDP II-4
32
Category Excellent
(A to A-)
Good
(B+ to B)
Average
(C+ to C)
Below Average
(D+ to D)
Failure
(F)
Marks
Overall Design I (10)
Inclusion of :
Process Flow Diagram
with heat integration
performed
Description on Process
Flow Diagram
Stream data table to
show mass balance,
operating conditions
Economic potential
State clearly the capacity of
the plant and its feedstock.
Provide complete PFD
generated using iCON for
heat integrated flow sheet
on A1 paper. All streams
and equipment are properly
and accurately labeled and
numbered.
Provide complete
description on the process
flow.
Provide a complete stream
data table to show mass
balance and operating
conditions.
Discuss the economic
potential of the design.
State clearly the capacity of
the plant and its feedstock.
Provide incomplete PFD
generated using iCON for
heat integrated flow sheet
on A1 paper, or with minor
errors. Streams and
equipment are labeled and
numbered with minor
errors.
Provide incomplete
description on the process
flow.
Provide incomplete stream
data table to show mass
balance and operating
conditions.
State briefly the economic
potential of the design.
State the capacity of the
plant and its feedstock.
Provide incomplete PFD
generated using iCON for
heat integrated flow sheet
on A1 paper, or with major
errors. Streams and
equipment are labeled and
numbered with minor
errors.
Provide incomplete
description on the process
flow, or with minor errors.
Provide incomplete stream
data table to show mass
balance and operating
conditions, or with minor
errors.
Discuss the economic
potential of the design, with
minor errors.
State the capacity of the
plant and its feedstock.
Provide incomplete PFD
generated using iCON for
heat integrated flow sheet
on A1 paper, or with major
errors. Streams and
equipment are labeled and
numbered with major
errors.
Provide incomplete
description on the process
flow, or with major errors.
Provide incomplete stream
data table to show mass
balance and operating
conditions, or with major
errors.
Discuss the economic
potential of the design, with
major errors.
Did not state clearly the
capacity of the plant and its
feedstock.
Do not provide PFD
generated using iCON for
heat integrated flow sheet
on A1 paper. All streams
and equipment are not
labeled and numbered
accurately.
Do not provide description
on the process flow.
Do not provide stream data
table to show mass balance
and operating conditions.
Do not discuss the
economic potential of the
design.
(Marks: 8-10) (Marks: 6.5-7.9) (Marks: 5.0-6.4) (Marks: 4.0-4.9) (Marks: 0.0-3.9)
33
Category Excellent
(A to A-)
Good
(B+ to B)
Average
(C+ to C)
Below Average
(D+ to D)
Failure
(F)
Marks
Overall Design II (40):
Instrumentation and
Control Strategy (10)
P&ID in A1 size
Reasonable
justification on control
requirements – basic
and advanced
Appropriate
numbering of process
equipment and
pipelines
Appropriate symbols
used – PTS or other
standards
Provide reasonable and
scientific justification on
the development of
instrumentation and control
system for the process.
Clearly show technical
application of fundamental
knowledge on control
strategy with latest
literature support.
Provide a complete
summary of control
requirements for main
equipment, possible
controlled and manipulated
variables in table form.
Provide reasonable and
limited scientific
justification on the
development of
instrumentation and control
system for the process.
Show limited technical
application of fundamental
knowledge on control
strategy with textbook
support.
Provide an incomplete
summary of control
requirements for main
equipment, possible
controlled and manipulated
variables in table form.
Provide relevant but not
scientific justification on
the development of
instrumentation and control
system for the process.
Show limited technical
application of fundamental
knowledge on control
strategy.
Provide an incomplete
summary of control
requirements for limited
number of equipment,
possible controlled and
manipulated variables in
table form.
Provide general and limited
justification on the
development of
instrumentation and control
system for the process
Show very limited or
minimum technical
application of fundamental
knowledge.
Provide an incomplete
summary of control
requirements for few
number of equipment with
minor error, possible
controlled and manipulated
variables in table form.
Lack or provide wrong
justification on the
development of
instrumentation and control
system for the process.
Lack or show wrong
technical application of
fundamental knowledge.
Do not provide a summary
of control requirements or
with major errors, possible
controlled and manipulated
variables in table form.
Provide a PID (drawn based
on PETRONAS Technical
Standard) that clearly
shows the control system
thoroughly with technical
accuracy.
Provide a PID (drawn based
on PETRONAS Technical
Standard) that clearly
shows the control system
with some technical
accuracy.
Provide a PID (drawn based
on PETRONAS Technical
Standard) that do not show
the control system
thoroughly (incomplete).
Provide a PID that shows
the incomplete control
system, with some technical
errors and not according to
PETRONAS Technical
Standard.
No drawing or evidence on
the implementation of
control strategy.
(Marks: 8-10) (Marks: 6.5-7.9) (Marks: 5.0-6.4) (Marks: 4.0-4.9) (Marks: 0.0-3.9)
34
Category Excellent
(A to A-)
Good
(B+ to B)
Average
(C+ to C)
Below Average
(D+ to D)
Failure
(F)
Marks
Safety and Loss
Prevention (10)
Reasonable selection
of study nodes for
HAZOP
Scaled plant layout in
A3 size
Reasonable
justification on safety
aspects
Appropriate standard
and symbols
Provide a report on a
complete and accurate
HAZOP analysis on
THREE (3) nodes
connected to ONE (1)
major equipment.
Provide a report on a
complete HAZOP analysis
on THREE (3) nodes
connected to ONE (1)
major equipment, with
minor errors.
Provide a report on an
incomplete HAZOP
analysis on THREE (3)
nodes connected to ONE
(1) major equipment, with
minor errors.
Provide a report on an
incomplete HAZOP
analysis on THREE (3)
nodes connected to ONE
(1) major equipment, with
major errors.
Lack or provide wrong
HAZOP analysis.
Provide a thorough HAZOP
worksheet that clearly
shows the study results with
technical accuracy.
Provide a HAZOP
worksheet that shows the
study results with some
technical accuracy.
Provide an incomplete
HAZOP worksheet that
shows the study results with
minor technical errors.
Provide an incomplete
HAZOP worksheet that
shows the study results with
major technical errors.
No worksheet or evidence
on the implementation of
HAZOP study.
Provide a complete and
scaled plant layout
arrangement with access
routes and safety
appliances, following
Codes of Practice and
Industry Guidance.
Provide reasonable and
practical
justification/statement on
the safety aspects of the
plant layout.
Provide a scaled plant
layout arrangement with
access routes and safety
appliances, following
Codes of Practice and
Industry Guidance.
Provide reasonable
justification/statement on
the safety aspects of the
plant layout.
Provide a scaled plant
layout arrangement with
access routes and safety
appliances, loosely
following Codes of Practice
and Industry Guidance.
Provide relevant
justification/statement on
the safety aspects of the
plant layout.
Provide a scaled plant
layout arrangement without
access routes and safety
appliances, loosely
following Codes of Practice
and Industry Guidance.
Provide limited
justification/statement on
the safety aspects of the
plant layout.
Lack or provide wrong
plant layout arrangement.
No drawing or evidence on
the design of plant layout.
(Marks: 8-10) (Marks: 6.5-7.9) (Marks: 5.0-6.4) (Marks: 4.0-4.9) (Marks: 0.0-3.9)
35
Category Excellent
(A to A-)
Good
(B+ to B)
Average
(C+ to C)
Below Average
(D+ to D)
Failure
(F)
Marks
Waste Treatment (10)
Identified wastes in the
design
Appropriate regulatory
limits
Block flow diagram to
treat all wastes
Reasonable
justification in
selecting treatment
method
Properly identify and
classify major waste along
with flow rate and nature
(i.e. phase, characteristics,
and compositions).
State appropriate regulation
limit.
Propose pollution control,
waste disposal and
treatment strategy based on
ethical and statutory
requirements, with sound
technical background and
practical implementation,
supported with block flow
diagram that shows the
major equipment
Identify and classify some
of the major waste along
with flow rate and nature
(i.e. phase, characteristics,
and compositions).
State appropriate regulation
limit.
Propose pollution control,
waste disposal and
treatment strategy based on
ethical and statutory
requirements, with relevant
technical background and
practical implementation,
supported with block flow
diagram that shows the
major equipment
Identify and classify some
of the major waste without
adequate information (i.e.
phase, characteristics, and
compositions).
State appropriate regulation
limit.
Propose pollution control,
waste disposal and
treatment strategy based on
ethical and statutory
requirements, with limited
technical background and
practical implementation,
and insufficient block flow
diagram
Identify and classify some
of the major waste without
adequate information (i.e.
phase, characteristics, and
compositions).
State irrelevant regulation
limit.
Propose pollution control,
waste disposal and
treatment strategy based on
ethical and statutory
requirements, with
inadequate
technical/practical
background and insufficient
block flow diagram
Do not identify and classify
the major wastes.
Lack or provide wrong
regulations.
Lack or show errors in the
development of pollution
control, waste disposal and
treatment strategy for the
process or lack or provide
wrong justification behind
the development.
(Marks: 8-10) (Marks: 6.5-7.9) (Marks: 5.0-6.4) (Marks: 4.0-4.9) (Marks: 0.0-3.9)
36
Category Excellent
(A to A-)
Good
(B+ to B)
Average
(C+ to C)
Below Average
(D+ to D)
Failure
(F)
Marks
Process Economics and
Cost Estimation (10)
Capital Cost
Estimation
Commercial
Implementation
Economic Estimation
Accuracy
Provide a complete
calculation for capital items,
operating costs and
economic potential of the
plant with reasonable and
practical assumptions.
Provide calculation for
capital items, operating
costs and economic
potential of the plant with
relevant assumptions.
Provide calculation for
capital items, operating
costs and economic
potential of the plant with
limitedly justified
assumptions and minor
errors.
Provide incomplete
calculation for capital items,
operating costs and
economic potential of the
plant with very limitedly
justified assumptions and
minor error.
Lack or wrong technical
assumptions in the
calculation for capital items,
operating costs and
economic potential of the
plant.
Use the latest costs and
prices in the detailed
economic calculation.
Use relevant costs and
prices in the detailed
economic calculation.
Use the latest costs and
prices in the detailed
economic calculation.
Use reasonable costs and
prices but with no proper
research in the detailed
economic calculation.
Use unreasonable and
wrong values for costs and
prices in the detailed
economic calculation.
Provide sound technical and
practical recommendation
as to the commercial
implementation of the
process.
Provide reasonable
technical and practical
recommendation as to the
commercial implementation
of the process.
Provide relevant technical
and practical
recommendation as to the
commercial implementation
of the process.
Provide poor technical and
practical recommendation
as to the commercial
implementation of the
process.
Lack technical and practical
recommendation as to the
commercial implementation
of the process.
Prove 25% accuracy using
the Detailed Factorial
Method.
Show 25-35% accuracy
using the Detailed Factorial
Method.
Prove 35-45% accuracy
using the Detailed Factorial
Method.
Prove 45-55% accuracy
using the Detailed Factorial
Method.
Show 100% error using the
Detailed Factorial Method.
(Marks: 8-10) (Marks: 6.5-7.9) (Marks: 5.0-6.4) (Marks: 4.0-4.9) (Marks: 0.0-3.9)
Form PDP II-3
37
Category Excellent
(A to A-)
Good
(B+ to B)
Average
(C+ to C)
Below Average
(D+ to D)
Failure
(F)
Marks
Conclusion and
Recommendation (10)
Relevancy to the
objectives
Suggested future
works on feasibility of
design
Relate the outcome from the
project to the objectives
clearly.
Discuss the feasibility of the
design thoroughly, or
design has practical,
technical and economic
feasibility.
Provide technical and
constructive suggestions to
improve the design.
Relate the outcome from the
project to the objectives.
Discuss the feasibility of the
design, or design has
limited practical, technical
and economic feasibility.
Provide suggestions to
improve the design.
Relate the outcome from the
project to the objectives
limitedly.
Discuss the feasibility of the
design limitedly, or design
has limited practical,
technical and economic
feasibility.
Provide limited suggestions
to improve the design.
Relate the outcome from the
project to the objectives
insufficiently.
Discuss the feasibility of the
design insufficiently, or
design has very limited
practical, technical and
economic feasibility.
Provide irrelevant
suggestions to improve the
design.
Do not relate the outcome
from the project to the
objectives, or the outcome
does not match the
objectives.
Did not discuss feasibility
of the design. Design is not
feasible.
Do not provide technical
and constructive
suggestions to improve the
design.
(Marks: 8-10) (Marks: 6.5-7.9) (Marks: 5.0-6.4) (Marks: 4.0-4.9) (Marks: 0.0-3.9)
38
Category Excellent
(A to A-)
Good
(B+ to B)
Average
(C+ to C)
Below Average
(D+ to D)
Failure
(F)
Marks
Others (20)
Compliance to standard
guideline
Neatness and consistency
in formatting style
References are quoted
and listed appropriately
Proper English Usage
Writing Skill
Follows the formatting
style stated by the
guidelines accurately.
Follows the formatting
style stated by the
guidelines to some extent.
Follows an acceptable
formatting style though not
as per the guidelines.
Uses an inconsistent
formatting style.
Not following any standard
formatting style.
Follows the method of
referencing stated by the
guidelines accurately.
Follows the method of
referencing stated by the
guidelines to some extent.
Follows acceptable method
of referencing though not
as per the guidelines.
Provide an inconsistent
method of referencing but
not as per the guidelines
provided.
No proper method of
referencing.
The report is very well
structured and provides
good flow of information
and discussion.
The report is well
structured and provides
good flow of information
(with very minimum
disorganization).
The report is structured
with minimum
disorganization.
The report is not structured
with obvious
disorganization.
No organization of content.
The content is
comprehensive, easy to be
understood with very
minimal spelling or
grammatical errors.
The content is easy to be
understood with minimal
spelling or grammatical
errors.
The content is easy to be
understood with some
spelling or grammatical
errors.
The content is slightly
difficult to be understood
with significant amount of
spelling and grammatical
errors.
The content is difficult to
be understood with
significant amount of
spelling and grammatical
errors.
(Marks: 16-20) (Marks: 13-15.9) (Marks: 10-12.9) (Marks: 8.0-9.9) (Marks: 0.0-7.9)
Comments:
.………………………….
Supervisor’s signature
Name : ______________________________________________________ Date : ____________________
39
FYDP II – INDIVIDUAL REPORT SCORE SHEET FOR SUPERVISOR
(To be completed by Supervisor)
Student’s Name: _______________________________________________ Student’s ID: _________
Group No: ______ Major Equipment: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Minor Equipment I: _______________________________________________ Minor Equipment II: ________________________________________
Minor Equipment III: _______________________________________________ Minor Equipment IV: ________________________________________
Programme: Chemical Engineering
Category Excellent
(A to A-)
Good
(B+ to B)
Average
(C+ to C)
Below Average
(D+ to D)
Failure
(F)
Marks
Process design of major
equipment (20)
Design methodology
Basis of selection
Sample calculation
Specification sheet
Provide reasonable and
scientific justification on
selection of process design
for major equipment.
The individual follows all
the parameters
(methodology, selection,
sample calculation and
specification sheets)
regarding process design of
major equipment
Provide reasonable and
limited scientific
justification on selection of
process design for major
equipment.
The individual follows
parameters (methodology,
selection, sample
calculation and
specification sheets)
regarding process design of
major equipment
Provide relevant but not
scientific justification on
selection of process design
for major equipment.
The individual follows
some of the parameters
(methodology, selection,
sample calculation and
specification sheets)
regarding process design of
major equipment
Provide general and limited
justification on selection of
process design for major
equipment.
The individual follows few
parameters (methodology,
selection, sample
calculation and
specification sheets)
regarding process design of
major equipment
Lack or provide wrong
justification selection of
process design for major
equipment
The individual does not
follow parameters
(methodology, selection,
sample calculation and
specification sheets)
regarding process design of
major equipment
(Marks: 16-20) (Marks: 13-15.9) (Marks: 10-12.9) (Marks: 8.0-9.9) (Marks: 0.0-7.9)
Form PDP II-5
40
Category Excellent
(A to A-)
Good
(B+ to B)
Average
(C+ to C)
Below Average
(D+ to D)
Failure
(F)
Marks
Minor Equipment I (10)
Design methodology
Specification sheet
Provide a complete and
comprehensive technical
description of minor
equipment I with design
methodology and
specification sheet
Provide comprehensive
technical description of
minor equipment I with
design methodology and
specification sheet
Provide relevant but not
technical description of
minor equipment I with
design methodology and
specification sheet
Provide general and limited
description of minor
equipment I with design
methodology and few errors
in specification sheet
Lack or provide wrong
description of minor
equipment I with design
methodology
(Marks: 8-10) (Marks: 6.5-7.9) (Marks: 5.0-6.4) (Marks: 4.0-4.9) (Marks: 0.0-3.9)
Minor Equipment II
(10)
Design methodology
Specification sheet
Provide a complete and
comprehensive technical
description of minor
equipment II with design
methodology and
specification sheet
Provide comprehensive
technical description of
minor equipment II with
design methodology and
specification sheet
Provide relevant but not
technical description of
minor equipment II with
design methodology and
specification sheet
Provide general and limited
description of minor
equipment II with design
methodology and few errors
in specification sheet
Lack or provide wrong
description of minor
equipment II with design
methodology and
specification sheet
(Marks: 8-10) (Marks: 6.5-7.9) (Marks: 5.0-6.4) (Marks: 4.0-4.9) (Marks: 0.0-3.9)
Minor Equipment III
(10)
Design methodology
Specification sheet
Provide a complete and
comprehensive technical
description of minor
equipment I with design
methodology and
specification sheet
Provide comprehensive
technical description of
minor equipment I with
design methodology and
specification sheet
Provide relevant but not
technical description of
minor equipment I with
design methodology and
specification sheet
Provide general and limited
description of minor
equipment I with design
methodology and few errors
in specification sheet
Lack or provide wrong
description of minor
equipment I with design
methodology
(Marks: 8-10) (Marks: 6.5-7.9) (Marks: 5.0-6.4) (Marks: 4.0-4.9) (Marks: 0.0-3.9)
Minor Equipment IV
(10)
Design methodology
Specification sheet
Provide a complete and
comprehensive technical
description of minor
equipment I with design
methodology and
specification sheet
Provide comprehensive
technical description of
minor equipment I with
design methodology and
specification sheet
Provide relevant but not
technical description of
minor equipment I with
design methodology and
specification sheet
Provide general and limited
description of minor
equipment I with design
methodology and few errors
in specification sheet
Lack or provide wrong
description of minor
equipment I with design
methodology
(Marks: 8-10) (Marks: 6.5-7.9) (Marks: 5.0-6.4) (Marks: 4.0-4.9) (Marks: 0.0-3.9)
41
Category Excellent
(A to A-)
Good
(B+ to B)
Average
(C+ to C)
Below Average
(D+ to D)
Failure
(F)
Marks
Mechanical design of
equipment (20)
Material selection
Pressure vessel thickness
calculations
Combined stress for tall
columns
Flanges, nozzles, skirts
and supports
Provide reasonable and
scientific justification of
selection of material
Clearly demonstrate the
correct calculations for
pressure vessel thickness
and combined stress for tall
columns with citation
support
Provide a complete
calculations and mechanical
specification of sheet
equipment and all
supporting component
(Flanges, nozzles, skirts
and other supports)
Provide reasonable and
limited scientific
justification of the selection
of material
Clearly demonstrate the
calculations for pressure
vessel thickness and
combined stress for tall
columns with text book
support
Provide incomplete
calculations and mechanical
specification sheet of
equipment and all
supporting component
(Flanges, nozzles, skirts
and other supports).
Provide relevant but not
scientific justification of the
selection of material
.
Show limited calculations
for pressure vessel
thickness and combined
stress for tall columns
Provide incomplete
calculations and mechanical
specification sheet of
equipment and most of its
supporting component
(Flanges, nozzles, skirts
and other supports)
Provide general and limited
justification of the selection
of material
Show very limited or
minimum technical
calculations for pressure
vessel thickness and
combined stress for tall
columns
Provide incomplete
calculations and mechanical
specification sheet of
equipment and few of its
supporting component
(Flanges, nozzles, skirts
and other supports).
Lack or provide wrong
justification of the selection
of material
Lack or show wrong
calculations for pressure
vessel thickness and
combined stress for tall
columns.
Provide an incomplete or
wrong calculations and
mechanical specification
sheet of equipment and its
component (Flanges,
nozzles, skirts and other
supports)
(Marks: 16-20) (Marks: 13-15.9) (Marks: 10-12.9) (Marks: 8.0-9.9) (Marks: 0.0-7.9)
Drawing of equipment
(10)
standards, dimensioning
and neatness
The equipment drawing
follows complete standards
with absolute dimensioning
of the equipment and
neatness.
The equipment drawing
follows standards with
absolute dimensioning of
the equipment and neatness.
The equipment drawing
follows standards with
absolute dimensioning of
the equipment.
The equipment drawing
does not follow complete
standards with
dimensioning of the
equipment.
The equipment drawing is
difficult to understand with
dimensioning errors of the
equipment with no
neatness.
(Marks: 8-10) (Marks: 6.5-7.9) (Marks: 5.0-6.4) (Marks: 4.0-4.9) (Marks: 0.0-3.9)
42
Category Excellent
(A to A-)
Good
(B+ to B)
Average
(C+ to C)
Below Average
(D+ to D)
Failure
(F)
Marks
Operating procedure
(10)
Start-up, operating and
shutdown procedures
Provide a complete
description of Start-up,
operating and shutdown
procedures of the
equipment with clear
practical assumptions.
Provide a description of
Start-up, operating and
shutdown procedures of the
equipment with relevant
practical assumptions.
Provide a description of
Start-up, operating and
shutdown procedures of the
equipment with limitedly
justified assumptions and
minor errors
Provide an incomplete
description of Start-up,
operating and shutdown
procedures of the
equipment with limitedly
justified assumptions and
minor errors
Lack or wrong technical
description of Start-up,
operating and shutdown
procedures of the
equipment
(Marks: 8-10) (Marks: 6.5-7.9) (Marks: 5.0-6.4) (Marks: 4.0-4.9) (Marks: 0.0-3.9)
Others (10)
Compliance to standard
guideline
Neatness and consistency
in formatting style
References are quoted
and listed appropriately
Proper English Usage
Writing Skill
Follows the formatting
style stated by the
guidelines accurately.
Follows the method of
referencing stated by the
guidelines accurately.
The report is very well
structured and provides
good flow of information
and discussion.
The content is
comprehensive, easy to be
understood with very
minimal spelling or
grammatical errors
Follows the formatting
style stated by the
guidelines to some extent.
Follows the method of
referencing stated by the
guidelines to some extent
The report is well
structured and provides
good flow of information
(with very minimum
disorganization).
The content is easy to be
understood with minimal
spelling or grammatical
errors.
Follows an acceptable
formatting style though not
as per the guidelines.
Follows acceptable method
of referencing though not as
per the guidelines.
The report is structured
with minimum
disorganization.
The content is easy to be
understood with some
spelling or grammatical
errors.
Uses an inconsistent
formatting style.
Provide an inconsistent
method of referencing but
not as per the guidelines
provided.
The report is not structured
with obvious
disorganization
The content is slightly
difficult to be understood
with significant amount of
spelling and grammatical
errors.
Not following any standard
formatting style.
No proper method of
referencing
No organization of content.
The content is difficult to
be understood with
significant amount of
spelling and grammatical
errors.
(Marks: 8-10) (Marks: 6.5-7.9) (Marks: 5.0-6.4) (Marks: 4.0-4.9) (Marks: 0.0-3.9)
TOTAL /90
Comments:
.………………………….………………………
Supervisor’s signature
Name : ____________________________________________ Date : ____________________
43
PDP II – EVALUATION OF FINAL ORAL PRESENTATION (GROUP)
(To be completed by Supervisor/External Examiner)
Group No: ______ Project Title:
Category Excellent
(A to A-)
Good
(B+ to B)
Average
(C+ to C)
Below Average
(D+ to D)
Failure
(F)
Marks
Process Design (25)
Process Operating Mode
Justification
Input–Output Structure
of the Flow sheet
Provide reasonable and
scientific justification on
selection of process
operating mode and
development of input-
output structure.
Provide reasonable and
limited scientific
justification on selection of
process operating mode and
development of input-
output structure.
Provide relevant but not
scientific justification on
selection of process
operating mode and
development of input-
output structure.
Provide general and limited
justification on selection of
process operating mode and
development of input-
output structure.
Lack or provide wrong
justification selection of
process operating mode and
development of input-
output structure.
Clearly show technical
application of fundamental
knowledge with latest
literature support.
Show limited technical
application of fundamental
knowledge with textbook
support.
Show limited technical
application of fundamental
knowledge.
Show very limited technical
application with minor error
of fundamental knowledge.
Lack or show wrong
technical application of
fundamental knowledge.
Reactor Design and
Reactor Network
Synthesis
Separation System -
Type of Separator
Justification and
Operating conditions
Heat Integration - Heat
Exchanger Network;
Utilities
Provide reasonable and
scientific justification on
design and network
synthesis for reactor and
separation systems.
Clearly show technical
application of fundamental
knowledge with latest
literature support.
Provide clear explanation
on the design of heat
exchanger network and the
saving in utilities, based on
the heat integration study.
Provide two PFDs which
clearly show the differences
made via the
implementation of heat
integration.
Provide reasonable and
limited scientific
justification on design and
network synthesis for
reactor and separation
systems.
Show limited technical
application of fundamental
knowledge with textbook
support.
Provide limited explanation
on the design of heat
exchanger network and the
saving in utilities, based on
the heat integration study.
Provide two PFDs which
clearly show the differences
made via the
implementation of heat
integration.
Provide relevant but not
scientific justification on
design and network
synthesis for reactor and
separation systems.
Show limited technical
application of fundamental
knowledge.
Provide limited explanation
on the design of heat
exchanger network and the
saving in utilities, based on
the heat integration study.
Provide only one PFD but
correctly show all the
implementation of heat
integration.
Provide general and limited
justification on design and
network synthesis for
reactor and separation
systems.
Show very limited or
minimum technical
application of fundamental
knowledge.
Provide very limited or
wrong explanation on the
design of heat exchanger
network and the saving in
utilities, based on the heat
integration study.
Provide only one PFD but
with errors on the
implementation of heat
integration.
Lack or provide wrong
justification on design and
network synthesis for
reactor and separation
systems.
Lack or show wrong
technical application of
fundamental knowledge.
Lack or provide wrong
explanation on the design of
heat exchanger network and
the saving in utilities, based
on the heat integration
study.
No information or evidence
on the implementation of
heat integration.
(Marks: 20-25) (Marks: 16.2-19.9) (Marks: 12.5-16.1) (Marks: 10-12.4) (Marks: 0.0-9.9)
Form PDP II-6
44
Category Excellent
(A to A-)
Good
(B+ to B)
Average
(C+ to C)
Below Average
(D+ to D)
Failure
(F)
Marks
Instrumentation and
Control Strategy (15)
Basic control strategy
Piping and
Instrumentation Diagram
(P&ID)
Provide reasonable and
scientific justification on
the development of
instrumentation and control
system for the process.
Clearly show technical
application of fundamental
knowledge on control
strategy with latest
literature support.
Provide a summary of
control requirements,
possible controlled and
manipulated variables in
table form.
Provide reasonable and
limited scientific
justification on the
development of
instrumentation and control
system for the process.
Show limited technical
application of fundamental
knowledge on control
strategy with textbook
support.
Provide a summary of
control requirements,
possible controlled and
manipulated variables in
table form.
Provide relevant but not
scientific justification on
the development of
instrumentation and control
system for the process.
Show limited technical
application of fundamental
knowledge on control
strategy.
Provide a summary of
control requirements,
possible controlled and
manipulated variables in
table form.
Provide general and limited
justification on the
development of
instrumentation and control
system for the process
Show very limited or
minimum technical
application of fundamental
knowledge.
Provide a summary of
control requirements,
possible controlled and
manipulated variables in
table form.
Lack or provide wrong
justification on the
development of
instrumentation and control
system for the process.
Lack or show wrong
technical application of
fundamental knowledge.
Do not provide a summary
of control requirements,
possible controlled and
manipulated variables in
table form.
Provide a PID (drawn based
on PETRONAS Technical
Standard) that clearly shows
the control system
thoroughly with technical
accuracy.
Provide a PID (drawn based
on PETRONAS Technical
Standard) that clearly shows
the control system with
some technical accuracy.
Provide a PID (drawn based
on PETRONAS Technical
Standard) that do not show
the control system
thoroughly (incomplete).
Provide a PID that shows
the incomplete control
system, with some technical
errors and not according to
PETRONAS Technical
Standard.
No drawing or evidence on
the implementation of
control strategy.
(Marks: 12.0-15.0) (Marks: 9.8-11.9) (Marks: 7.5-9.6) (Marks: 6.0-7.4) (Marks: 0.0-5.9)
45
Category Excellent
(A to A-)
Good
(B+ to B)
Average
(C+ to C)
Below Average
(D+ to D)
Failure
(F)
Marks
Safety and Loss
Prevention (15)
Hazard and Operability
Studies (HAZOP)
Plant Layout
Provide a report on a
complete and accurate
HAZOP analysis on
THREE (3) nodes
connected to ONE (1)
major equipment.
Provide a report on a
complete HAZOP analysis
on THREE (3) nodes
connected to ONE (1)
major equipment, with
minor errors.
Provide a report on an
incomplete HAZOP
analysis on THREE (3)
nodes connected to ONE
(1) major equipment, with
minor errors.
Provide a report on an
incomplete HAZOP
analysis on THREE (3)
nodes connected to ONE
(1) major equipment, with
major errors.
Lack or provide
wrongHAZOP analysis.
Provide a thorough HAZOP
worksheet that clearly
shows the study results with
technical accuracy.
Provide a HAZOP
worksheet that shows the
study results with some
technical accuracy.
Provide an incomplete
HAZOP worksheet that
shows the study results with
minor technical errors.
Provide an incomplete
HAZOP worksheet that
shows the study results with
major technical errors.
No worksheet or evidence
on the implementation of
HAZOP study.
Provide a complete and
scaled plant layout
arrangement with access
routes and safety
appliances, following
Codes of Practice and
Industry Guidance.
Provide reasonable and
practical
justification/statement on
the safety aspects of the
plant layout.
Provide a scaled plant
layout arrangement with
access routes and safety
appliances, following
Codes of Practice and
Industry Guidance.
Provide reasonable
justification/statement on
the safety aspects of the
plant layout.
Provide a scaled plant
layout arrangement with
access routes and safety
appliances, loosely
following Codes of Practice
and Industry Guidance.
Provide relevant
justification/statement on
the safety aspects of the
plant layout.
Provide a scaled plant
layout arrangement without
access routes and safety
appliances, loosely
following Codes of Practice
and Industry Guidance.
Provide limited
justification/statement on
the safety aspects of the
plant layout.
Lack or provide wrong
plant layout arrangement.
No drawing or evidence on
the design of plant layout.
(Marks: 12.0-15.0) (Marks: 9.8-11.9) (Marks: 7.5-9.6) (Marks: 6.0-7.4) (Marks: 0.0-5.9)
46
Category Excellent
(A to A-)
Good
(B+ to B)
Average
(C+ to C)
Below Average
(D+ to D)
Failure
(F)
Marks
Waste Treatment (15)
Identification of Major
Waste
Identification of
Regulation limit
Appropriate Method of
Treatment and Basic
flow diagram
Properly identify and
classify major waste along
with flow rate and nature
(i.e. phase, characteristics,
and compositions).
State appropriate regulation
limit.
Propose pollution control,
waste disposal and
treatment strategy based on
ethical and statutory
requirements, with sound
technical background and
practical implementation,
supported with block flow
diagram that shows the
major equipment.
Identify and classify some
of the major waste along
with flow rate and nature
(i.e. phase, characteristics,
and compositions).
State appropriate regulation
limit.
Propose pollution control,
waste disposal and
treatment strategy based on
ethical and statutory
requirements, with relevant
technical background and
practical implementation,
supported with block flow
diagram that shows the
major equipment.
Identify and classify some
of the major waste without
adequate information (i.e.
phase, characteristics, and
compositions).
State appropriate regulation
limit.
Propose pollution control,
waste disposal and
treatment strategy based on
ethical and statutory
requirements, with limited
technical background and
practical implementation,
and insufficient block flow
diagram.
Identify and classify some
of the major waste without
adequate information (i.e.
phase, characteristics, and
compositions).
State irrelevant regulation
limit.
Propose pollution control,
waste disposal and
treatment strategy based on
ethical and statutory
requirements, with
inadequate
technical/practical
background and insufficient
block flow diagram.
Do not identify and classify
the major wastes.
Lack or provide wrong
regulations.
Lack or show errors in the
development of pollution
control, waste disposal and
treatment strategy for the
process or lack or provide
wrong justification behind
the development.
(Marks: 12.0-15.0) (Marks: 9.8-11.9) (Marks: 7.5-9.6) (Marks: 6.0-7.4) (Marks: 0.0-5.9)
Process Economics and
Cost Estimation (20)
Capital Estimation
Operating Cost
Economic Potential
Provide a complete
calculation for capital items,
operating costs and
economic potential of the
plant with reasonable and
practical assumptions.
Provide calculation for
capital items, operating
costs and economic
potential of the plant with
relevant assumptions.
Provide calculation for
capital items, operating
costs and economic
potential of the plant with
limitedly justified
assumptions and minor
errors.
Provide a calculation for
capital items, operating
costs and economic
potential of the plant with
very limitedly justified
assumptions and minor
error.
Lack or wrong technical
assumptions in the
calculation for capital items,
operating costs and
economic potential of the
plant.
Provide sound technical and
practical recommendation
as to the commercial
implementation of the
process.
Provide reasonable
technical and practical
recommendation as to the
commercial implementation
of the process.
Provide relevant technical
and practical
recommendation as to the
commercial implementation
of the process.
Provide poor technical and
practical recommendation
as to the commercial
implementation of the
process.
Lack technical and practical
recommendation as to the
commercial implementation
of the process.
Prove 25% accuracy using
the Detailed Factorial
Method.
Show 25-35% accuracy
using the Detailed Factorial
Method.
Prove 35-45% accuracy
using the Detailed Factorial
Method.
Prove 45-55% accuracy
using the Detailed Factorial
Method.
Show 100% error using the
Detailed Factorial Method.
(Marks: 16-20) (Marks: 13-15.9) (Marks: 10-12.9) (Marks: 8.0-9.9) (Marks: 0.0-7.9)
Form PDP II-3
47
Category Excellent
(A to A-)
Good
(B+ to B)
Average
(C+ to C)
Below Average
(D+ to D)
Failure
(F)
Marks
Team Work (10)
Ability to work with others
in order to provide best
performance/presentation.
Completed the presentation
within the time given. Show
high coordination of tasks
and smooth transition
between members.
Completed the presentation
within the time given. Show
good coordination of tasks
and good/smooth transition
between members.
Exceed the time given to
complete the presentation
(1-2 minutes). Show
moderate coordination of
tasks and smooth transition
between members.
Exceed the time given to
complete the presentation
(3-4 minutes). Show no
coordination of tasks and
irregular/unsmooth
transition between
members.
Did not complete the
presentation within the time
given (more than 5
minutes). No clear division
or coordination of tasks
among members.
Highly awareness
/attentiveness between
members.
Good awareness
/attentiveness between
members.
Members are aware and
focus with other member’s
tasks.
Low focus /attentiveness
between members.
Members are not focus and
attentive towards other
members.
(Marks: 8-10)
(Marks: 6.5-7.9)
(Marks: 5.0-6.4)
(Marks: 4.0-4.9)
(Marks: 0.0-3.9)
Comments:
.………………………….………………………
Supervisor/Examiner’s signature
Name : ______________________________________________________ Date : ______________________
48
FYDP II – EVALUATION OF FINAL ORAL PRESENTATION (INDIVIDUAL)
(To be completed by Supervisor)
Student’s Name: _______________________________________________ Student’s ID: _________
Group No: ______ Project Title:
Programme: Chemical Engineering
Category Excellent
(A to A-)
Good
(B+ to B)
Average
(C+ to C)
Below Average
(D+ to D)
Failure
(F)
Marks
Non-verbal
Communication (20)
Professionalism:
appearance, Facial
expression;
confidence,
enthusiasm
Gesture: Eye Contact,
Pauses
The oral presentation is
presented in complete
professional way regarding
the dressing, expressions,
enthusiasm and confidence
The non-verbal
communication takes no
pauses with full eye contact
The oral presentation is
presented in professional
way regarding the dressing,
expressions, enthusiasm and
confidence
The non-verbal
communication takes few
pauses with full eye contact
The oral presentation is
tried to present in
professional way regarding
the dressing, expressions,
enthusiasm and confidence
The non-verbal
communication takes few
pauses with most of the eye
contact
The oral presentation is
tried to present in
professional way but with
lack of confidence and
enthusiasm
The non-verbal
communication lacks eye
contact with several pauses
during presentation.
The oral presentation does
not satisfy professionalism
regarding the dressing,
expressions, enthusiasm and
confidence
The non-verbal
communication does not
satisfy the eye contact with
several pauses during
presentation.
(Marks: 16-20) (Marks: 13-15.9) (Marks: 10-12.9) (Marks: 8.0-9.9) (Marks: 0.0-7.9)
Form PDP II-7
49
Category Excellent
(A to A-)
Good
(B+ to B)
Average
(C+ to C)
Below Average
(D+ to D)
Failure
(F)
Marks
Clarity of presentation
(40)
Vocal Clarity and
Quality: volume, rate,
articulation,
pronunciation natural,
conversational, emphasis
Fluency and choice of
words: (using language
clearly and accurately)
Pronunciation,
articulation
Continuity of
Presentation
Use of aids (graphs,
diagrams, objects etc)
Organization: logical
flow, time management
The presentation shows the
clear vocal clarity with
quality professional
presenting skills
The choice of words are
perfect with fluent
consistency
The presentation covers all
the relevant aids (graphs,
diagrams and objects) in
organized form
.
The presentation skills
show vocal clarity with
clear professionalism
The choice of words are
good with fluent
consistency
The presentation covers
relevant aids (graphs,
diagrams and objects) with
organized form
The presentation shows
most of the vocal clarity
with professional presenting
skills
The choice of words are
satisfactory with fluent
consistency
The presentation covers
most of the relevant aids
(graphs, diagrams and
objects) with deficient in
organized form
.
The presentation shows the
lack in vocal clarity with
satisfactory presenting
skills
The choice of words are
satisfactory with lack in
fluent consistency
The presentation covers few
relevant aids (graphs,
diagrams and objects) with
deficient in organized form
The presentation does not
show the vocal clarity with
unsatisfactory presenting
skills
The choice of words are
unsatisfactory with no
fluent consistency
The presentation does not
cover any relevant aids
(graphs, diagrams and
objects) with deficient in
organized form
(Marks: 32-40)
(Marks: 26-31.9)
(Marks: 20-25.9)
(Marks: 16.0-19.9)
(Marks: 0.0-15.9)
Thoroughness of the
Subject (20)
Knowledge of the subject
Technical and factual
accuracy; Grasp of
subject
The individual shows full
hold on the topic and
possess a deep knowledge
of the subject with technical
aspects
The individual has hold on
the topic and possess a deep
knowledge of the subject
with technical aspects
The individual has some
hold on the topic and
possess some knowledge of
the subject with few
technical aspects
The individual has
satisfactory hold on the
topic and possess a
acceptable knowledge of
the subject with few
technical aspects
The individual does not
show grasp on the topic and
possess unsatisfactory
knowledge of the subject
(Marks: 16-20) (Marks: 13-15.9) (Marks: 10-12.9) (Marks: 8.0-9.9) (Marks: 0.0-7.9)
50
Category Excellent
(A to A-)
Good
(B+ to B)
Average
(C+ to C)
Below Average
(D+ to D)
Failure
(F)
Marks
Questions and Answers
(20)
Creativity – use of
example
Convincing Answer,
Showing creativity and
Innovativeness
Ability to anticipate and
answer questions
Ability to maintain good
relationship with
questioners
The individual clearly
answered all the questions
with convincing knowledge
using relevant examples.
The individual shows full
anticipation and maintain
very good relation with the
questioners
The individual answered all
the questions with
convincing knowledge
using relevant example.
The individual shows
anticipation and maintain
very good relation with the
questioners
The individual answered
most of the questions with
satisfactory knowledge
using relevant example.
The individual shows
satisfactory anticipation and
maintain good relation with
the questioners
The individual answered
few questions with
satisfactory knowledge
using example.
The individual shows
satisfactory anticipation and
maintain normal relation
with the questioners
The individual does not
answered any questions
with convincing knowledge
with irrelevant examples.
The individual does not
show anticipation and does
not maintain good relation
with the questioners
(Marks: 16-20) (Marks: 13-15.9) (Marks: 10-12.9) (Marks: 8.0-9.9) (Marks: 0.0-7.9)
Comments:
.………………………….………………………
Supervisor’s signature
Name : ______________________________________________________ Date : ______________________
51
EVALUATION FORM PDP II – GROUP REPORT (DESIGN)
(PROCESS CONTROL STRATEGY AND P&ID)
(To be completed by Internal Expert)
Group No: ______ Project Title:
Category Excellent
(A to A-)
Good
(B+ to B)
Average
(C+ to C)
Below Average
(D+ to D)
Failure
(F)
Marks
Chapter 4:
Instrumentation and
Control Strategy (20)
P&ID in A1 size
Reasonable justification
on control requirements –
basic and advanced
Appropriate numbering
of process equipment and
pipelines
Appropriate symbols
used – PTS or other
standards
Provide reasonable and
scientific justification on
the development of
instrumentation and control
system for the process.
Clearly show technical
application of fundamental
knowledge on control
strategy with latest
literature support.
Provide a complete
summary of control
requirements for main
equipment, possible
controlled and manipulated
variables in table form.
Provide reasonable and
limited scientific
justification on the
development of
instrumentation and control
system for the process.
Show limited technical
application of fundamental
knowledge on control
strategy with textbook
support.
Provide an incomplete
summary of control
requirements for main
equipment, possible
controlled and manipulated
variables in table form.
Provide relevant but not
scientific justification on
the development of
instrumentation and control
system for the process.
Show limited technical
application of fundamental
knowledge on control
strategy.
Provide an incomplete
summary of control
requirements for limited
number of equipment,
possible controlled and
manipulated variables in
table form.
Provide general and limited
justification on the
development of
instrumentation and control
system for the process
Show very limited or
minimum technical
application of fundamental
knowledge.
Provide an incomplete
summary of control
requirements for few
number of equipment with
minor error, possible
controlled and manipulated
variables in table form.
Lack or provide wrong
justification on the
development of
instrumentation and control
system for the process.
Lack or show wrong
technical application of
fundamental knowledge.
Do not provide a summary
of control requirements or
with major errors, possible
controlled and manipulated
variables in table form.
Provide a PID (drawn
based on PETRONAS
Technical Standard) that
clearly shows the control
system thoroughly with
technical accuracy.
Provide a PID (drawn
based on PETRONAS
Technical Standard) that
clearly shows the control
system with some technical
accuracy.
Provide a PID (drawn
based on PETRONAS
Technical Standard) that do
not show the control
system thoroughly
(incomplete).
Provide a PID that shows
the incomplete control
system, with some
technical errors and not
according to PETRONAS
Technical Standard.
No drawing or evidence on
the implementation of
control strategy.
(Marks: 16-20) (Marks: 13-15.9) (Marks: 10-12.9) (Marks: 8.0-9.9) (Marks: 0.0-7.9)
Form PDP II-8
52
Category Excellent
(A to A-)
Good
(B+ to B)
Average
(C+ to C)
Below Average
(D+ to D)
Failure
(F)
Marks
Others (10)
Compliance to standard
guideline
Neatness and consistency
in formatting style
References are quoted
and listed appropriately
Proper English Usage
Writing Skill
Follows the formatting
style stated by the
guidelines accurately.
Follows the formatting
style stated by the
guidelines to some extent.
Follows an acceptable
formatting style though not
as per the guidelines.
Uses an inconsistent
formatting style.
Not following any standard
formatting style.
Follows the method of
referencing stated by the
guidelines accurately.
Follows the method of
referencing stated by the
guidelines to some extent.
Follows acceptable method
of referencing though not
as per the guidelines.
Provide an inconsistent
method of referencing but
not as per the guidelines
provided.
No proper method of
referencing.
The report is very well
structured and provides
good flow of information
and discussion.
The report is well
structured and provides
good flow of information
(with very minimum
disorganization).
The report is structured
with minimum
disorganization.
The report is not structured
with obvious
disorganization.
No organization of content.
The content is
comprehensive, easy to be
understood with very
minimal spelling or
grammatical errors.
The content is easy to be
understood with minimal
spelling or grammatical
errors.
The content is easy to be
understood with some
spelling or grammatical
errors.
The content is slightly
difficult to be understood
with significant amount of
spelling and grammatical
errors.
The content is difficult to
be understood with
significant amount of
spelling and grammatical
errors.
(Marks: 8-10) (Marks: 6.5-7.9) (Marks: 5.0-6.4) (Marks: 4.0-4.9) (Marks: 0.0-3.9)
TOTAL /30
Comments:
.………………………
Examiner’s signature
Name : ______________________________________________________ Date : ______________________
53
EVALUATION FORM PDP II – GROUP REPORT (DESIGN) FOR INTERNAL EXPERT
(PROCESS ECONOMICS AND COST ESTIMATION)
(To be completed by Internal Expert)
Group No: ______ Project Title:
Category Excellent
(A to A-)
Good
(B+ to B)
Average
(C+ to C)
Below Average
(D+ to D)
Failure
(F)
Marks
Chapter 7:
Process Economics and
Cost Estimation (20)
Capital Cost Estimation
Commercial
Implementation
Economic Estimation
Accuracy
Provide a complete
calculation for capital
items, operating costs and
economic potential of the
plant with reasonable and
practical assumptions.
Provide calculation for
capital items, operating
costs and economic
potential of the plant with
relevant assumptions.
Provide calculation for
capital items, operating
costs and economic
potential of the plant with
limitedly justified
assumptions and minor
errors.
Provide incomplete
calculation for capital
items, operating costs and
economic potential of the
plant with very limitedly
justified assumptions and
minor error
Lack or wrong technical
assumptions in the
calculation for capital
items, operating costs and
economic potential of the
plant.
Use the latest costs and
prices in the detailed
economic calculation.
Use relevant costs and
prices in the detailed
economic calculation.
Use the latest costs and
prices in the detailed
economic calculation.
Use reasonable costs and
prices but with no proper
research in the detailed
economic calculation.
Use unreasonable and
wrong values for costs and
prices in the detailed
economic calculation.
Provide sound technical
and practical
recommendation as to the
commercial
implementation of the
process.
Provide reasonable
technical and practical
recommendation as to the
commercial
implementation of the
process.
Provide relevant technical
and practical
recommendation as to the
commercial
implementation of the
process.
Provide poor technical and
practical recommendation
as to the commercial
implementation of the
process.
Lack technical and
practical recommendation
as to the commercial
implementation of the
process.
Prove 25% accuracy using
the Detailed Factorial
Method.
Show 25-35% accuracy
using the Detailed
Factorial Method.
Prove 35-45% accuracy
using the Detailed
Factorial Method.
Prove 45-55% accuracy
using the Detailed
Factorial Method.
Show 100% error using the
Detailed Factorial Method.
(Marks: 16-20) (Marks: 13-15.9) (Marks: 10-12.9) (Marks: 8.0-9.9) (Marks: 0.0-7.9)
Form PDP II-3
Form PDP II-9
54
Category Excellent
(A to A-)
Good
(B+ to B)
Average
(C+ to C)
Below Average
(D+ to D)
Failure
(F)
Marks
Others (10)
Compliance to standard
guideline
Neatness and
consistency in
formatting style
References are quoted
and listed appropriately
Proper English Usage
Writing Skill
Follows the formatting
style stated by the
guidelines accurately.
Follows the formatting
style stated by the
guidelines to some extent.
Follows an acceptable
formatting style though
not as per the guidelines.
Uses an inconsistent
formatting style.
Not following any
standard formatting style.
Follows the method of
referencing stated by the
guidelines accurately.
Follows the method of
referencing stated by the
guidelines to some extent.
Follows acceptable
method of referencing
though not as per the
guidelines.
Provide an inconsistent
method of referencing but
not as per the guidelines
provided.
No proper method of
referencing.
The report is very well
structured and provides
good flow of information
and discussion.
The report is well
structured and provides
good flow of information
(with very minimum
disorganization).
The report is structured
with minimum
disorganization.
The report is not structured
with obvious
disorganization.
No organization of
content.
The content is
comprehensive, easy to be
understood with very
minimal spelling or
grammatical errors.
The content is easy to be
understood with minimal
spelling or grammatical
errors.
The content is easy to be
understood with some
spelling or grammatical
errors.
The content is slightly
difficult to be understood
with significant amount of
spelling and grammatical
errors.
The content of the report is
difficult to be understood
with significant amount of
spelling and grammatical
errors.
(Marks: 8-10) (Marks: 6.5-7.9) (Marks: 5.0-6.4) (Marks: 4.0-4.9) (Marks: 0.0-3.9)
TOTAL /30
Comments:
.………………………
Examiner’s signature
Name : ______________________________________________________ Date : ______________________
55
EVALUATION FORM PDP II – GROUP REPORT (DESIGN) FOR INTERNAL EXPERT
(SAFETY AND LOSS PREVENTION)
(To be completed by Internal Expert)
Group No: ______ Project Title:
Category Excellent
(A to A-)
Good
(B+ to B)
Average
(C+ to C)
Below Average
(D+ to D)
Failure
(F)
Marks
Chapter 5:
Safety and Loss
Prevention (20)
Reasonable selection of
study nodes for HAZOP
Scaled plant layout in A3
size
Reasonable justification
on safety aspects
Appropriate standard and
symbols
Provide a report on a
complete and accurate
HAZOP analysis on
THREE (3) nodes
connected to ONE (1)
major equipment.
Provide a report on a
complete HAZOP analysis
on THREE (3) nodes
connected to ONE (1)
major equipment, with
minor errors.
Provide a report on an
incomplete HAZOP
analysis on THREE (3)
nodes connected to ONE
(1) major equipment, with
minor errors.
Provide a report on an
incomplete HAZOP
analysis on THREE (3)
nodes connected to ONE
(1) major equipment, with
major errors.
Lack or provide wrong
HAZOP analysis.
Provide a thorough
HAZOP worksheet that
clearly shows the study
results with technical
accuracy.
Provide a HAZOP
worksheet that shows the
study results with some
technical accuracy.
Provide an incomplete
HAZOP worksheet that
shows the study results
with minor technical errors.
Provide an incomplete
HAZOP worksheet that
shows the study results
with major technical errors.
No worksheet or evidence
on the implementation of
HAZOP study.
Provide a complete and
scaled plant layout
arrangement with access
routes and safety
appliances, following
Codes of Practice and
Industry Guidance.
Provide reasonable and
practical
justification/statement on
the safety aspects of the
plant layout.
Provide a scaled plant
layout arrangement with
access routes and safety
appliances, following
Codes of Practice and
Industry Guidance.
Provide reasonable
justification/statement on
the safety aspects of the
plant layout.
Provide a scaled plant
layout arrangement with
access routes and safety
appliances, loosely
following Codes of
Practice and Industry
Guidance.
Provide relevant
justification/statement on
the safety aspects of the
plant layout.
Provide a scaled plant
layout arrangement without
access routes and safety
appliances, loosely
following Codes of
Practice and Industry
Guidance.
Provide limited
justification/statement on
the safety aspects of the
plant layout.
Lack or provide wrong
plant layout arrangement.
No drawing or evidence on
the design of plant layout.
(Marks: 16-20) (Marks: 13-15.9) (Marks: 10-12.9) (Marks: 8.0-9.9) (Marks: 0.0-7.9)
Form PDP II-10
56
Category Excellent
(A to A-)
Good
(B+ to B)
Average
(C+ to C)
Below Average
(D+ to D)
Failure
(F)
Marks
Others (10)
Compliance to standard
guideline
Neatness and consistency
in formatting style
References are quoted
and listed appropriately
Proper English Usage
Writing Skill
Follows the formatting
style stated by the
guidelines accurately.
Follows the formatting
style stated by the
guidelines to some extent.
Follows an acceptable
formatting style though not
as per the guidelines.
Uses an inconsistent
formatting style.
Not following any standard
formatting style.
Follows the method of
referencing stated by the
guidelines accurately.
Follows the method of
referencing stated by the
guidelines to some extent.
Follows acceptable method
of referencing though not
as per the guidelines.
Provide an inconsistent
method of referencing but
not as per the guidelines
provided.
No proper method of
referencing.
The report is very well
structured and provides
good flow of information
and discussion.
The report is well
structured and provides
good flow of information
(with very minimum
disorganization).
The report is structured
with minimum
disorganization.
The report is not structured
with obvious
disorganization.
No organization of content.
The content is
comprehensive, easy to be
understood with very
minimal spelling or
grammatical errors.
The content is easy to be
understood with minimal
spelling or grammatical
errors.
The content is easy to be
understood with some
spelling or grammatical
errors.
The content is slightly
difficult to be understood
with significant amount of
spelling and grammatical
errors.
The content of the report is
difficult to be understood
with significant amount of
spelling and grammatical
errors.
(Marks: 8-10) (Marks: 6.5-7.9) (Marks: 5.0-6.4) (Marks: 4.0-4.9) (Marks: 0.0-3.9)
TOTAL /30
Comments:
.………………………
Examiner’s signature
Name : ______________________________________________________ Date : ______________________
57
EVALUATION FORM PDP II – GROUP REPORT (DESIGN)
(WASTE TREATMENT STRATEGY)
(To be completed by Internal Expert)
Group No: ______ Project Title:
Category Excellent
(A to A-)
Good
(B+ to B)
Average
(C+ to C)
Below Average
(D+ to D)
Failure
(F)
Marks
Chapter 6:
Waste Treatment (20)
Identified wastes in the
design
Appropriate regulatory
limits
Block flow diagram to
treat all wastes
Reasonable justification
in selecting treatment
method
Properly identify and
classify major waste along
with flow rate and nature
(i.e. phase, characteristics,
and compositions).
State appropriate
regulation limit.
Propose pollution control,
waste disposal and
treatment strategy based on
ethical and statutory
requirements, with sound
technical background and
practical implementation,
supported with block flow
diagram that shows the
major equipment
Identify and classify some
of the major waste along
with flow rate and nature
(i.e. phase, characteristics,
and compositions).
State appropriate
regulation limit.
Propose pollution control,
waste disposal and
treatment strategy based on
ethical and statutory
requirements, with relevant
technical background and
practical implementation,
supported with block flow
diagram that shows the
major equipment
Identify and classify some
of the major waste without
adequate information (i.e.
phase, characteristics, and
compositions).
State appropriate
regulation limit.
Propose pollution control,
waste disposal and
treatment strategy based on
ethical and statutory
requirements, with limited
technical background and
practical implementation,
and insufficient block flow
diagram
Identify and classify some
of the major waste without
adequate information (i.e.
phase, characteristics, and
compositions).
State irrelevant regulation
limit.
Propose pollution control,
waste disposal and
treatment strategy based on
ethical and statutory
requirements, with
inadequate
technical/practical
background and
insufficient block flow
diagram
Do not identify and
classify the major wastes.
Lack or provide wrong
regulations.
Lack or show errors in the
development of pollution
control, waste disposal and
treatment strategy for the
process or lack or provide
wrong justification behind
the development.
(Marks: 16-20) (Marks: 13-15.9) (Marks: 10-12.9) (Marks: 8.0-9.9) (Marks: 0.0-7.9)
Form PDP II-11
58
Category Excellent
(A to A-)
Good
(B+ to B)
Average
(C+ to C)
Below Average
(D+ to D)
Failure
(F)
Marks
Others (10)
Compliance to standard
guideline
Neatness and consistency
in formatting style
References are quoted
and listed appropriately
Proper English Usage
Writing Skill
Follows the formatting
style stated by the
guidelines accurately.
Follows the formatting
style stated by the
guidelines to some extent.
Follows an acceptable
formatting style though not
as per the guidelines.
Uses an inconsistent
formatting style.
Not following any standard
formatting style.
Follows the method of
referencing stated by the
guidelines accurately.
Follows the method of
referencing stated by the
guidelines to some extent.
Follows acceptable method
of referencing though not
as per the guidelines.
Provide an inconsistent
method of referencing but
not as per the guidelines
provided.
No proper method of
referencing.
The report is very well
structured and provides
good flow of information
and discussion.
The report is well
structured and provides
good flow of information
(with very minimum
disorganization).
The report is structured
with minimum
disorganization.
The report is not structured
with obvious
disorganization.
No organization of content.
The content is
comprehensive, easy to be
understood with very
minimal spelling or
grammatical errors.
The content is easy to be
understood with minimal
spelling or grammatical
errors.
The content is easy to be
understood with some
spelling or grammatical
errors.
The content is slightly
difficult to be understood
with significant amount of
spelling and grammatical
errors.
The content of the report is
difficult to be under stood
with significant amount of
spelling and grammatical
errors.
(Marks: 8-10) (Marks: 6.5-7.9) (Marks: 5.0-6.4) (Marks: 4.0-4.9) (Marks: 0.0-3.9)
TOTAL /30
Comments:
.………………………
Examiner’s signature
Name : ______________________________________________________ Date : ______________________
59
FYDP II – INDIVIDUAL REPORT SCORE SHEET FOR INTERNAL EXPERT
(To be completed by Internal Expert)
Student’s Name: _______________________________________________ Student’s ID: _________
Group No: ______ Major Equipment: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Minor Equipment I: _______________________________________________ Minor Equipment II: ________________________________________
Minor Equipment III: _______________________________________________ Minor Equipment IV: ________________________________________
Programme: Chemical Engineering
Category Excellent
(A to A-)
Good
(B+ to B)
Average
(C+ to C)
Below Average
(D+ to D)
Failure
(F)
Marks
Process design of major
equipment (20)
Design methodology
Basis of selection
Sample calculation
Specification sheet
Provide reasonable and
scientific justification on
selection of process design
for major equipment.
The individual follows all
the parameters
(methodology, selection,
sample calculation and
specification sheets)
regarding process design of
major equipment
Provide reasonable and
limited scientific
justification on selection of
process design for major
equipment.
The individual follows
parameters (methodology,
selection, sample
calculation and
specification sheets)
regarding process design of
major equipment
Provide relevant but not
scientific justification on
selection of process design
for major equipment.
The individual follows
some of the parameters
(methodology, selection,
sample calculation and
specification sheets)
regarding process design of
major equipment
Provide general and limited
justification on selection of
process design for major
equipment.
The individual follows few
parameters (methodology,
selection, sample
calculation and
specification sheets)
regarding process design of
major equipment
Lack or provide wrong
justification selection of
process design for major
equipment
The individual does not
follow parameters
(methodology, selection,
sample calculation and
specification sheets)
regarding process design of
major equipment
(Marks: 16-20) (Marks: 13-15.9) (Marks: 10-12.9) (Marks: 8.0-9.9) (Marks: 0.0-7.9)
Form PDP II-12
60
Category Excellent
(A to A-)
Good
(B+ to B)
Average
(C+ to C)
Below Average
(D+ to D)
Failure
(F)
Marks
Minor Equipment I (10)
Design methodology
Specification sheet
Provide a complete and
comprehensive technical
description of minor
equipment I with design
methodology and
specification sheet
Provide comprehensive
technical description of
minor equipment I with
design methodology and
specification sheet
Provide relevant but not
technical description of
minor equipment I with
design methodology and
specification sheet
Provide general and limited
description of minor
equipment I with design
methodology and few errors
in specification sheet
Lack or provide wrong
description of minor
equipment I with design
methodology
(Marks: 8-10) (Marks: 6.5-7.9) (Marks: 5.0-6.4) (Marks: 4.0-4.9) (Marks: 0.0-3.9)
Minor Equipment II
(10)
Design methodology
Specification sheet
Provide a complete and
comprehensive technical
description of minor
equipment II with design
methodology and
specification sheet
Provide comprehensive
technical description of
minor equipment II with
design methodology and
specification sheet
Provide relevant but not
technical description of
minor equipment II with
design methodology and
specification sheet
Provide general and limited
description of minor
equipment II with design
methodology and few errors
in specification sheet
Lack or provide wrong
description of minor
equipment II with design
methodology and
specification sheet
(Marks: 8-10) (Marks: 6.5-7.9) (Marks: 5.0-6.4) (Marks: 4.0-4.9) (Marks: 0.0-3.9)
Minor Equipment III
(10)
Design methodology
Specification sheet
Provide a complete and
comprehensive technical
description of minor
equipment I with design
methodology and
specification sheet
Provide comprehensive
technical description of
minor equipment I with
design methodology and
specification sheet
Provide relevant but not
technical description of
minor equipment I with
design methodology and
specification sheet
Provide general and limited
description of minor
equipment I with design
methodology and few errors
in specification sheet
Lack or provide wrong
description of minor
equipment I with design
methodology
(Marks: 8-10) (Marks: 6.5-7.9) (Marks: 5.0-6.4) (Marks: 4.0-4.9) (Marks: 0.0-3.9)
Minor Equipment IV
(10)
Design methodology
Specification sheet
Provide a complete and
comprehensive technical
description of minor
equipment I with design
methodology and
specification sheet
Provide comprehensive
technical description of
minor equipment I with
design methodology and
specification sheet
Provide relevant but not
technical description of
minor equipment I with
design methodology and
specification sheet
Provide general and limited
description of minor
equipment I with design
methodology and few errors
in specification sheet
Lack or provide wrong
description of minor
equipment I with design
methodology
(Marks: 8-10) (Marks: 6.5-7.9) (Marks: 5.0-6.4) (Marks: 4.0-4.9) (Marks: 0.0-3.9)
61
Category Excellent
(A to A-)
Good
(B+ to B)
Average
(C+ to C)
Below Average
(D+ to D)
Failure
(F)
Marks
Mechanical design of
equipment (20)
Material selection
Pressure vessel thickness
calculations
Combined stress for tall
columns
Flanges, nozzles, skirts
and supports
Provide reasonable and
scientific justification of
selection of material
Clearly demonstrate the
correct calculations for
pressure vessel thickness
and combined stress for tall
columns with citation
support
Provide a complete
calculations and mechanical
specification of sheet
equipment and all
supporting component
(Flanges, nozzles, skirts
and other supports)
Provide reasonable and
limited scientific
justification of the selection
of material
Clearly demonstrate the
calculations for pressure
vessel thickness and
combined stress for tall
columns with text book
support
Provide incomplete
calculations and mechanical
specification sheet of
equipment and all
supporting component
(Flanges, nozzles, skirts
and other supports).
Provide relevant but not
scientific justification of the
selection of material
.
Show limited calculations
for pressure vessel
thickness and combined
stress for tall columns
Provide incomplete
calculations and mechanical
specification sheet of
equipment and most of its
supporting component
(Flanges, nozzles, skirts
and other supports)
Provide general and limited
justification of the selection
of material
Show very limited or
minimum technical
calculations for pressure
vessel thickness and
combined stress for tall
columns
Provide incomplete
calculations and mechanical
specification sheet of
equipment and few of its
supporting component
(Flanges, nozzles, skirts
and other supports).
Lack or provide wrong
justification of the selection
of material
Lack or show wrong
calculations for pressure
vessel thickness and
combined stress for tall
columns.
Provide an incomplete or
wrong calculations and
mechanical specification
sheet of equipment and its
component (Flanges,
nozzles, skirts and other
supports)
(Marks: 16-20) (Marks: 13-15.9) (Marks: 10-12.9) (Marks: 8.0-9.9) (Marks: 0.0-7.9)
Drawing of equipment
(10)
standards, dimensioning
and neatness
The equipment drawing
follows complete standards
with absolute dimensioning
of the equipment and
neatness.
The equipment drawing
follows standards with
absolute dimensioning of
the equipment and neatness.
The equipment drawing
follows standards with
absolute dimensioning of
the equipment.
The equipment drawing
does not follow complete
standards with
dimensioning of the
equipment.
The equipment drawing is
difficult to understand with
dimensioning errors of the
equipment with no
neatness.
(Marks: 8-10) (Marks: 6.5-7.9) (Marks: 5.0-6.4) (Marks: 4.0-4.9) (Marks: 0.0-3.9)
62
Category Excellent
(A to A-)
Good
(B+ to B)
Average
(C+ to C)
Below Average
(D+ to D)
Failure
(F)
Marks
Operating procedure (10)
Start-up, operating and
shutdown procedures
Provide a complete
description of Start-up,
operating and shutdown
procedures of the
equipment with clear
practical assumptions.
Provide a description of
Start-up, operating and
shutdown procedures of the
equipment with relevant
practical assumptions.
Provide a description of
Start-up, operating and
shutdown procedures of the
equipment with limitedly
justified assumptions and
minor errors
Provide an incomplete
description of Start-up,
operating and shutdown
procedures of the
equipment with limitedly
justified assumptions and
minor errors
Lack or wrong technical
description of Start-up,
operating and shutdown
procedures of the
equipment
(Marks: 8-10) (Marks: 6.5-7.9) (Marks: 5.0-6.4) (Marks: 4.0-4.9) (Marks: 0.0-3.9)
Others (10)
Compliance to standard
guideline
Neatness and consistency
in formatting style
References are quoted
and listed appropriately
Proper English Usage
Writing Skill
Follows the formatting
style stated by the
guidelines accurately.
Follows the method of
referencing stated by the
guidelines accurately.
The report is very well
structured and provides
good flow of information
and discussion.
The content is
comprehensive, easy to be
understood with very
minimal spelling or
grammatical errors
Follows the formatting
style stated by the
guidelines to some extent.
Follows the method of
referencing stated by the
guidelines to some extent
The report is well
structured and provides
good flow of information
(with very minimum
disorganization).
The content is easy to be
understood with minimal
spelling or grammatical
errors.
Follows an acceptable
formatting style though not
as per the guidelines.
Follows acceptable method
of referencing though not as
per the guidelines.
The report is structured
with minimum
disorganization.
The content is easy to be
understood with some
spelling or grammatical
errors.
Uses an inconsistent
formatting style.
Provide an inconsistent
method of referencing but
not as per the guidelines
provided.
The report is not structured
with obvious
disorganization
The content is slightly
difficult to be understood
with significant amount of
spelling and grammatical
errors.
Not following any standard
formatting style.
No proper method of
referencing
No organization of content.
The content is difficult to
be understood with
significant amount of
spelling and grammatical
errors.
(Marks: 8-10) (Marks: 6.5-7.9) (Marks: 5.0-6.4) (Marks: 4.0-4.9) (Marks: 0.0-3.9)
TOTAL /90
Comments:
.………………………….………………………
Internal expert’s signature
Name : ____________________________________________ Date : ____________________