plainview-elgin-millville self-assessment
DESCRIPTION
Plainview-Elgin-Millville Self-Assessment. Presented to RAMSP April 28, 2010. Goals. Aim #1: High Student Achievement Provide an educational environment that challenges all learners to raise their level of achievement - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Presented to RAMSP April 28, 2010
GoalsAim #1:
High Student AchievementProvide an educational environment that challenges all
learners to raise their level of achievement Integrate technology throughout the district as a teaching
and learning toolPartner with parents and communities to foster student
learning Aim #2:
A Safe, Welcoming, Engaging Learning Environment Aim #3:
Effective and Efficient Operations
Baseline/Trend DataPlainview and Elgin-Millville School
Districts consolidated in the fall of 2006. We’ve taken 4 rounds of standardized
testing as P-E-M (results available from 2007, 2008, 2009).
We’re still establishing our baseline. We need more data to confirm trends and to make judgments about our next direction.
Actual Results (Math MCA-II)Tested in
↓Class of
2012Class of
2013Class of
2014Class of
2015Class of
2016Class of
2017Class of
2018
Spring of 3rd grade -- -- -- -- 2 -1 2
Spring of 4th grade -- -- -- 18 4 -7
Tested in Spring 2010
Spring of 5th grade -- -- 12 12 1
Tested in Spring 2010
Spring of 6th grade -- 6 12 21
Tested in Spring 2010
Spring of 7th grade -5 5 7
Tested in Spring 2010
Spring of 8th grade -2 6
Tested in Spring 2010
Current 10th
Current 9th
Current 8th
Current 7th
Current 6th
Current 5th
Current 4th
Percentage Difference in MATH Proficiency: PEM vs. State Average
Actual Results (Science MCA-II)Class
of 2010
Class of
2011
Class of
2012
Class of
2013
Class of
2014
Class of
2015
Class of
2016
Class of
2017Tested
in Spring 2008
26(69/43
)
13(51/3
8)
14(53/39
)
Tested in
Spring 2009
22(72/50
)
5(48/43
)
5(50/45
)
Tested in
Spring 2010
TBD TBD TBD
Current
12t
h
Current
11t
h
Current
10t
h
Curren
t 9th Curren
t 8th Curren
t 7th
Curren
t 6th Curren
t 5th Percentage Difference in SCIENCE Proficiency: PEM vs.
State Average
Comparative Data PLAN test 09-10 – taken in Grade 10
PLAN Average Test Score
Comparative Data 11th Grade Math Proficiency 2008-2009
65% Dover-Eyota60% Byron55% Rochester53% Zumbrota-
Mazeppa49% Kasson-
Mantorville
44% P-E-M42% State AverageNote: Test not currently required for
graduationResults taken from MDE’s Educator Portal
39% Pine Island38% Chatfield35% Triton34% Stewartville30% Hayfield22% Kingsland
Comparative Data High School Science Proficiency 2008-2009
72% P-E-M
69% Byron66% Kingsland64% Dover-Eyota63% Pine Island62% Stewartville
Note: Test not currently required for graduation (Typically tested at the end of 10th grade year)
Results taken from MDE’s Educator Portal
58% Zumbrota-Mazeppa
56% Rochester56% Chatfield51% Triton50% State Average49% Kasson-
Mantorville46% Hayfield
Lead Indicators At this time our scores remain consistent
(No steep growth, no large dips). Currently reinvigorating Curriculum Cycle
and implementing Staff Evaluation Cycle. These are key elements to creating and maintaining growth at every grade level.
New math series implemented 2009-2010(Waiting to see the effect, which will likely take more than one testing year).
Next StepsTake advantage of the Mobile Science Lab.
We had personnel trained at one point, but never followed up. This would certainly enhance our science efforts.
Continue our commitment to Virtual PLCs with other RAMSP schools. (Thanks to RAMSP Science Subcommittee for coordinating a convenient medium to learn from one another’s expertise.)
Lessons Learned/Best PracticesCurriculum sharing between schools is a must.
In the last 2 years, P-E-M has participated in math cohorts with grades 5-12. They’ve all been well received and seem to have enhanced our curriculum.
Teacher-to-Teacher ProgramGrade-level science cohorts (a RAMSP
initiative a few years ago) were very effective, and the vPLC is a great follow-up using available technology.
SummaryStill establishing a trend as a district.
Data from all assessments tend to put us “in the mix” district-wide, but more information will help us find key issues to address at and within grade levels.
Grade-level cohorts in science and math across districts really help teachers see an immediate impact in their classrooms.