pipelines – bridging the gap

20
Pipelines – Bridging the Gap S.K. SATIJA General Manager Indian Oil Corporation Limited

Upload: perrin

Post on 13-Feb-2016

61 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

DESCRIPTION

Pipelines – Bridging the Gap. S.K. SATIJA General Manager Indian Oil Corporation Limited . History of Oil Pipelines. History of Oil Pipelines. Growth of Pipelines in India. Growth of Pipelines in India. Growth of Pipelines in India. Drivers for Growth of Pipelines in India. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Pipelines – Bridging the Gap

Pipelines – Bridging the Gap

S.K. SATIJAGeneral Manager

Indian Oil Corporation Limited

Page 2: Pipelines – Bridging the Gap

STRUCTURE OF PRESENTATIONHistorical Perspective – Oil Pipelines

Pipeline Infrastructure in India

Technological Developments

Modewise Transportation of Petroleum Products

New Pipelines – bridging Gap

Present Industry Scenario- Critical Aspects

Page 3: Pipelines – Bridging the Gap

History of Oil Pipelines

First trunk pipeline dates back to 1870s

Long distance pipeline transportation got a boost during World War-II when coastal tanker traffic was disrupted in U.S

Page 4: Pipelines – Bridging the Gap

History of Oil PipelinesDiscoveries of giant oil fields in remote parts of the world led to development of correspondingly large crude oil pipeline networks

Pipeline industry has grown in parallel with the development of world oil industry over the last one century

Page 5: Pipelines – Bridging the Gap

First crude oil pipeline in India laid from Digboi oil fields to Digboi refinery before independence

During 1960-63, Oil India Limited laid 1156 km long first trunk crude oil pipeline, from Naharkatiya and Moran oil fields to the refineries at Guwahati and Barauni

IndianOil laid its first cross country product

pipeline during 1962-64 to transport products from Guwahati refinery to Siliguri

Growth of Pipelines in India

Page 6: Pipelines – Bridging the Gap

Government & Industry started realizing unique advantages of oil transportation through pipelines

Subsequently, a number of product and crude oil

pipelines were laid in the 60’s, 70’s and 80’s, including sub-sea crude oil pipelines

This led to development of this industry, especially during last two decades

Growth of Pipelines in India

Page 7: Pipelines – Bridging the Gap

The pipelines laid during the 60’s were designed, engineered and constructed by foreign companies. However, the exposure to this technology enabled Indian engineers to gain confidence, and the pipelines which came up later, were designed and constructed with indigenous expertise

India today has over 22500 km of major crude oil and product pipelines out of which IOCL owns & operates more than 11,000 km of Pipelines

Growth of Pipelines in India

Page 8: Pipelines – Bridging the Gap

Low consumption of petro products in the initial years post independence due to subdued economic growth

Early refineries in India installed at coastal locations requiring only coastal movement of crude oil

Refining capacities being low, products were either consumed locally or transported to the consumption centres by rail or road

Drivers for Growth of Pipelines in India

Page 9: Pipelines – Bridging the Gap

Traditionally rail network has been quite widespread in India. Pipelines relatively came into focus quite late

After 1960, most of the refineries came up at land-locked locations necessitating laying of crude and product pipelines.

Drivers for Growth of Pipelines in India

Page 10: Pipelines – Bridging the Gap

Typical Advantages of Pipelines

Lower cost of transportatio

n

about 30-50% of the

railway freight and 4 to 5 times

cheaper than road

transportation

Lower transit losses

PL- 0.05% Max.,

Railway- 0.25%,

Road- 0.5%

Energy efficient

Railway mode

consumes 3-4 times and road

mode about 20

times more energy

than Pipeline

mode

Safety and Reliability

minimum disruptions

Environment friendly

3-4 times lesser Carbon

emissions than

Railway mode

Page 11: Pipelines – Bridging the Gap

As on 1.12.2012IOCL BPCL# HPCL## GAIL OIL ONGC

###Cairn Total

IndustryLength (Kms.)

Product 6632 1939 2776 1691 654 - - 13692Crude Oil 4376 935 1017 - 1193 676 667 8864

Total 11008 2874 3793 1691 1847.3 676 667 22556Capacity (MMTPA)

Product 36.86 10.35 22.27 3.6 1.70 - - 74.78

Crude Oil 40.40 6.0 9.0 - 8.40 43.84 7.5 115.1

Total 77.26 16.35 31.27 3.6 10.1 43.84 7.5 189.88

#Includes Petronet Cochin-Coimbatore-Karur Product pipeline##Includes Petronet Mangalore-Hassan-Bangalore Product Pipeline### Source: PPAC

Existing Liquid Pipelines : Industry

Page 12: Pipelines – Bridging the Gap

IOCL’s ExistingPipeline Network

KandlaVadinar

Chaksu

Mundra

Guwahati

BongaigaonSiliguri

Digboi

Tinsukia

Jalandhar

DelhiMeerut

Tundla

NajibabadRoorkee

Ambala

Mathura

KotSidhpur Ahmedabad

Jodhpur

Navagam

SanganerAjmer

Dahej

Chittaurgarh

Koyali

Bhatinda

SangrurPanipat

Rewari

Haldia

BarauniKanpurLucknow

Mourigram

Rajbandh

Chennai

Sankari Asanur

Trichy

Madurai

CBR

Product

LEGEND

Crude Oil

Pipeline Length Capacity (km) (MMTPA)

Product 6632 36.86

Gas 132 9.5 MMSCMD

Crude 4376 40.40Total 11008 77.26

BangaloreBangalore AFS

Paradip

Ratlam

Chennai AFS

Refinery

12

Hazira

Gas

Bharatpur

as on 1.12.2012

Page 13: Pipelines – Bridging the Gap

Oil Pipelines Industry Scene

MumbaiVizag

Panipat

Guwahati

Koyali

Nahorkatiya

Haldia

Mathura

Manmad

Vijayawada

Kochi

Barauni

Kanpur

Bhatinda

Kandla

Vadinar

Chaksu

Ahmedabad

Jalandhar

Jodhpur

BudgeBudge

Kot

Delhi

BongaigaonSiliguri

Meerut

Sidhpur

Digboi

Tinsukia

Karur

Chennai

MumbaiHigh

Uran

Ankleshwar

Navagam

Tundla/B’PurLucknow

Mangalore Bangalore

Secunderabad

Indore

Sanganer

Pune

Maurigram

Rajbandh

NajibabadRoorkee

Ambala

Sangrur

Rewari

Ajmer

Chittaurgarh

Dahej

Coimbatore

Sankari Asanur

Trichy

Madurai

Paradip

Mundra

ProductCrude Oil

IOC’s Pipelines (Existing)

Jamnagar

Loni Shahjahanpur

Hazira

JagdishpurNumaligarh

Ratlam

PakniHazarwadi

Other Companies’ Pipelines(Existing)

ProductCrude OilLPG

Page 14: Pipelines – Bridging the Gap

Technological Developments Improvement in Piping Specifications - API 5L- X70

grades pipelines allows reduction in thickness of pipeline/ number of pump stations

Intelligent Pigging - To ascertain integrity of pipeline without disrupting operations

Horizontal Directional Drilling – Easy to cross major rivers; Crossing highways, Railways etc. without causing traffic obstructions

Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition System - SCADA applications allows better control and operation of pipeline system with less human intervention requirements

Leak Detection System

Page 15: Pipelines – Bridging the Gap

India

Modewise Transportation-Tonne-Km Basis

(Source: PPAC 2010-11)

Coastal 22% Pipe-

line48%

Road15%

15

Rail15%

Rail3%

Road4% P

ipeline71%

Coastal22%

(Source : Association of Oil Pipelines, USA)

USA

Page 16: Pipelines – Bridging the Gap

IOC - Projects under Implementation

S. No. Projects’ Description Length (km) Cap. (MMTPA)

Cost(Rs. Cr.)

1. Hook-up of Tikrikalan Terminal with MJPL

8 3.0 59

2. Addl. Tanks & blending facility at Vadinar

- - 267

3. Integrated Crude Handling Facilities at Paradip

70 - 1492

4. Paradip- Raipur-Ranchi Pipeline 1065 5.0 1793

5. Kolkata ATF Pipeline 28 0.13 45

6. Guwahati ATF Pipeline 35 0.07 44

7. Debottlenecking of SMPL 767 21 to 25 1584

8. Cauvery Basin Refinery-Trichy Pipeline 114 0.4 98

9. Paradip-Haldia-Durgapur LPG PIpeline 710 0.5/0.85 913

10. Aug. of Paradip-Haldia-Barauni Pipeline 64 11.0 to 15.2 586

11. Hook up of Jasidih ToP with HBPL - - 14.2

12. Aug of Panipat-Rewari Pipeline - 1.5 to 2.1 5.94

13. Branch Pipeline to Motihari and Baitalpur 275 1.5 276

Total 3136 19.75 7177.14

Page 17: Pipelines – Bridging the Gap

Product Pipelines – Bridging the Gap

S. No. Pipeline Name Oil

CompanyLength (km)

Capacity (MMTPA)

Capex(Rs. Cr.)

1. Hook-up of Tikrikalan terminal with Mathura - Jalandar PL

IOC 8 3.0 59

2. Branch PL from Viramgam to Kandla off Koyali-Sanganer PL

IOC 231 0.5 349

3. Augmentation of Chennai-Trichy-Madurai PL

IOC - 0.5 46

4. Paradip - Vizag-Rajamundary-Vijaiwada-Cherllapally PL

IOC 1200 3.7 2000

5. Koyali-Akolner PL IOC 600 2.5 6606. Branch pipeline to Raxual-

Baitalpur (ex-Patna on Barauni Kanpur PL)

IOC 275 1.2 305

7. Aonla-Banthra extension of Mathura - Tundla PL

IOC 500 1.0 200

8 Paradip - Sambalpur – Raipur - Ranchi PL

IOC 1068 5.0 1793

Page 18: Pipelines – Bridging the Gap

S. No. Pipeline Name Oil

CompanyLength (km)

Capacity (MMMTPA)

Capex(Rs. Cr.)

9 Branch line to Una on Panipat- Ambala-Jalandar PL

IOC 70 0.7 101

10 Cauvery Basin Refinery/ Narimanam-Trichy PL

IOC 114 0.4 98

11 Bina-Kota PL BPC 258 2.8 139812 Kota-Jobner PL BPC 210 1.7 -13. Kota-Piyala PL(Augmentation) BPC 200 1.0 20014. Ramanmandi-Bahadurgarh PL HPC 270 4.7 40015. Ramanmandi-Bhatinda PL HPC 30 1.4 6116. Bahadurgarh-Tikri Kalan PL HPC 13 1.1 6017. Rewari-Kanpur PL HPC 450 3.0 110018. Awa-Salawas PL HPC 100 0.8 200

Total 5597 34.9 9030

Product Pipelines – Bridging the Gap

Page 19: Pipelines – Bridging the Gap

Present Industry Scenario: Critical Aspects

National Oil Companies facing acute fiscal challenges due to prevailing norms on product pricing and fund crunch for their expansion

Statutory Clearances have become more complex; Projects are getting delayed on this account

Land Acquisition Problems