pigou-dalton consistent multidimensional inequality measures: some characterizations c. lasso de la...
TRANSCRIPT
Pigou-Dalton consistent multidimensional inequality measures:
some characterizations
C. Lasso de la Vega, A.de Sarachu, and A. Urrutia
University of the Basque Country
A consistent multidimensional generalization of the Pigou-Dalton transfer principle: an Analysis (2007) The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics.
PIGOU-DALTON CONSISTENT MULTIDIMENSIONAL INEQUALITY MEASURES
THE OUTLINE:1. Motivation2. Some basic notions about:
The Pigou-Dalton transfer principle in the one-dimensional framework
The Uniform Majorization
3. The proposal of a proper generalization of the Pigou-Dalton principle :The Pigou-Dalton bundle principle
4. Characterizations of classes of aggregative multidimensional inequality measures consistent with the Pigou Dalton bundle principle
5. Some concluding remarks
1. MOTIVATION
How might multidimensional distributions be compared in order to say that one distribution is more equal than another ?
Multidimensional Context:
Uniform majorization, UM
One dimensional Context:
Pigou-Dalton transfer principle
1 2
1 12 20
2 4 8
3 18 6
A A
person
person
person
X : 1 2
1 10 20
2 6 8
3 18 6
A A
person
person
person
Y :
According to the Pigou-Dalton transfer principle inequality is bound to diminish.
These two distributions can not be compared with UM.
Where
1
1i i j
j i j
y x x
y x x
0,1
xj xi
yj
Xj+
yi
Xi-+
1
1i i
j j
y x
y x
Y B X
2. BASIC NOTIONS about the Pigou-Dalton principle in the unidimensional setting
2i jx x
Bistochastic matrix:
• Non negatives entries
• each row sums to 1
• each column sums to 1
Single attribute:
individual i’s income
1
...
...i
n
x
x
x
2. BASIC NOTIONS about the Pigou-Dalton transfer principle in the unidimensional setting
Pigou-Dalton transfer principle:
if Y can be obtained from X by a finite sequence of Pigou-
Dalton progressive transfers
or equivalently
If Y =BX, where B is a bistochastic matrix I Y I X
I Y I X
X =
1
...
...i
n
x
x
x
2. BASIC NOTIONS ABOUT THE UNIFORM MAJORIZATION
11 1 1
1
1
. .
... ...
. .
j k
i ij ik
n nj nk
x x x
x x xX
x x x Bundle of attributes of the individual i
Individual i’s quantity of attribute j
incomeincome health education
Uniform majorization:
if Y= BX where B is a bistochastic matrix
(Kolm, (1977); Marshall and Olkin, (1979))
( ) ( )I Y I X
•
Attrib 1
Att
rib 2
2 3
1
•
•
•
12 20
4 8
18 6
X =
10 20
6 8
18 6
Y =
10 17
6 11
18 6
'Y =BX
Attrib 1
Att
rib 2
2 3
1
•
•
• Attrib 1
Att
rib 2
2 3
1
•
•
• •
•
•
2. BASIC NOTIONS ABOUT THE UNIFORM MAJORIZATION
Some difficulties arise with UM:
1) The reasons for transferring all attributes in the same proportions are not clear.
2) It is not necessarily the case that each attribute can be considered as transferable, for
instance for educational attainment or health status.
3) This criterion warrants transfers of different directions for different attributes, and is not
limited to cases when one individual is richer than another, being not obvious that
these transfers are inequality reducing.
Attribute 1
Att
ribut
e 2
23
1
•
•
• •
•
Attribute 1
Att
ribut
e 2
23
1
•
•
• •
• •
2. BASIC NOTIONS ABOUT THE UNIFORM MAJORIZATION
Who is the richer person?
If a person has more of all attributes than another, we can unambiguously
consider this person richer than the second.
The Pigou-Dalton Bundle principle, PD, requires that
whenever an individual i is richer than another j, a transfer of at least part of one
attribute from individual i to j that preserves the order, decreases inequality.
This principle gets over the previous difficulties:
1) It is not necessary to transfer all attributes in the same proportions.
2) the attributes which are considered as transferable can be selected.
3) It takes into consideration who is the richer and who is the poorer.
Fleurbaey and Trannoy , Soc Choice Welfare (2003)
3. THE PIGOU-DALTON BUNDLE PRINCIPLE
Following Tsui (1999):
MULTIDIMENSIONAL GENERALIZATION OF THE GENERALIZED ENTROPY FAMILY
4. OUR CHARACTERIZATION RESULTS
4. OUR CHARACTERIZATION RESULTS
•There exist measures in our family that don’t belong to the family derived by Tsui, that is,
measures fullfilling PD and not UM, and vice versa
•There exist measures in the family derived by Tsui that don’t belong to our family, that is,
measures fullfilling UM and not PD
•There exist measures belonging to both families, that is, measures fullfilling PD and UM.
1 2
1 2
/
1 i1 2 i21 i n
/
1 1 2 2
r ri1 i21 i n
r r1 2
r x r x11 0
n r rB X
x x11 0
n
1 0 1where and
Bourguignon (1999)
√
1 2 0when r r
5. FUTURE RESEARCH
1 2
1 2
r ri1 i21 i n
r
/
1 i1 2 i21 i n
/
1 1
r1
2 2
2
r x r x11 0
n rB X
x x11 0
n
r
1 0 1where and
Bourguignon (1999)
A related area of research:
The characterization of all multidimensional inequality measures that are
Pigou-Dalton Bundle consistent.
(without imposing the aggregative principle).
This paper :
• provides a greater understanding of the Pigou-Dalton transfer principle in
the multidimensional framework
• represents a step forward in the derivation of multidimensional inequality
measures by imposing some convenient properties.