pic symposium 2011 | nashville, tn selection for lifetime production

22
PIC Symposium 2011 | Nashville, T Selection for Lifetime Production

Upload: sybil-zoe-allison

Post on 16-Jan-2016

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: PIC Symposium 2011 | Nashville, TN Selection for Lifetime Production

PIC Symposium 2011 | Nashville, TN

Selection for Lifetime Production

Page 2: PIC Symposium 2011 | Nashville, TN Selection for Lifetime Production

PIC Symposium 2011 | Nashville, TN

Complexity of Lifetime Production

Number Born AliveTotal BornStillborn %

PreWeaning ThroughputPiglet Survival - SowPiglet Survival - PigletBirth WeightWeaning WeightTeat NumberDefects

Litters / Sow / YearWean-to-Effective Service IntervalGestation LengthLactation Length

Lifetime EfficiencyAge at Effective MatingSow MortalityInvoluntary Culling / StructureFeed Utilization

Page 3: PIC Symposium 2011 | Nashville, TN Selection for Lifetime Production

PIC Symposium 2011 | Nashville, TN

Process of Genetic Improvement

• Detailed and meaningful data capture

• Accurate prediction of genetic merit

• Meaningful selection objectives and targets

Page 4: PIC Symposium 2011 | Nashville, TN Selection for Lifetime Production

PIC Symposium 2011 | Nashville, TN

Data Sources

MULTIPLICATION

COMMERCIAL Breeding stock

GN

COMMERCIAL CROSS BRED SLAUGHTER PIGS

CBVsand selection

decisions

PICTraqDatabase

GN Progeny Performance Data

Commercial Sow Performance Data

Commercial Progeny Performance Data

EBVs

SIRE LINE

DAM LINE

Page 5: PIC Symposium 2011 | Nashville, TN Selection for Lifetime Production

PIC Symposium 2011 | Nashville, TN

Dam Line Programs

April 2011

Page 6: PIC Symposium 2011 | Nashville, TN Selection for Lifetime Production

PIC Symposium 2011 | Nashville, TN

Purebred and Crossbred Sows Contributing to Genetic Evaluation

0

20,000

40,000

60,000

80,000

100,000

120,000

L02 and L03 GGP Sows

L02 Sows

L03 Sows

43000

44000

45000

46000

47000

48000

49000

Pedigreed Crossbred Sows

Page 7: PIC Symposium 2011 | Nashville, TN Selection for Lifetime Production

PIC Symposium 2011 | Nashville, TN

GNX FIRE TestImplemented in May 2010

Enhanced Differentiation

• Pedigreed commmercial pigs– Terminal– Maternal

• Heavy slaughter weights– Approximately 290 lbs.

• Low energy, pelleted diets

Page 8: PIC Symposium 2011 | Nashville, TN Selection for Lifetime Production

PIC Symposium 2011 | Nashville, TN

Prediction of Genetic Merit

• Basic principle…– Resemblance between relatives

• Meaningful data• Accurate pedigree

• Historically, we have utilized data flows combined with pedigree and small amounts of genomic information for prediction of genetic merit (i.e. EBV’s, index values, etc.)

Page 9: PIC Symposium 2011 | Nashville, TN Selection for Lifetime Production

PIC Symposium 2010 | Nashville, TN

Genomic Selection

Initial Implementation of New Era of Genetic Technologies

Scrotal Hernia

Finisher Mortality

Total Born

Page 10: PIC Symposium 2011 | Nashville, TN Selection for Lifetime Production

PIC Symposium 2011 | Nashville, TN

What’s Next?Single Step Genomic Evaluation

Information extracted from the DNA can be used mainly in two ways:

Genetic markers: estimate the effect of each SNP on each trait.

Genomic relationships: estimate the actual fraction of genes identical by descendent

Page 11: PIC Symposium 2011 | Nashville, TN Selection for Lifetime Production

PIC Symposium 2011 | Nashville, TN

How many identical genes 2 pigs share?Resemblance Between Relatives

Based on pedigree, we assume it’s 50% between ALL full-siblings

EBV EBV EBV EBV

Page 12: PIC Symposium 2011 | Nashville, TN Selection for Lifetime Production

PIC Symposium 2011 | Nashville, TN

How many identical genes 2 pigs share?Resemblance Between Relatives

Based on pedigree, we assume it’s 50% between ALL full-siblingsGenomic Information shows it is between 40 and 60%

EBV EBV EBV EBV

Page 13: PIC Symposium 2011 | Nashville, TN Selection for Lifetime Production

PIC Symposium 2011 | Nashville, TN

Single Step Genomic EvaluationWhere’s the Benefit?

• Instead of assuming relationships based only pedigrees we define relationship on pedigree + DNA,

• Therefore for every animal and every trait our genetic evaluation is improved…– Constantly linking newest phenotypic data with– Pedigree information augmented by DNA

• Delivering a significant cumulative gain in accuracy of selection.

Page 14: PIC Symposium 2011 | Nashville, TN Selection for Lifetime Production

PIC Symposium 2011 | Nashville, TN

Single Step Genomic EvaluationIncreasing Rate of Genetic Gain

TRAIT ACC EBV ACC GEBV increase

Total Number Born 0.36 0.40 11%

Stillborn % 0.28 0.33 18%

Litter weaning weight 0.16 0.20 25%

Interval weaning - mate 0.11 0.14 27%

Survival birth - weaning 0.29 0.34 17%

Page 15: PIC Symposium 2011 | Nashville, TN Selection for Lifetime Production

PIC Symposium 2011 | Nashville, TN

Genetic Differentiation = Profitability Enhancement

• If selection objectives and intensity are aligned and focused, PIC differentiation in the sow farm should be delivered via delivery of high quality weaned pigs at the lowest possible cost…– Maximum efficiency per litter– Maximum efficiency of inventory– Maximum efficiency in utilization of inputs

Page 16: PIC Symposium 2011 | Nashville, TN Selection for Lifetime Production

PIC Symposium 2011 | Nashville, TN

PIC Commercial Female Performance

Page 17: PIC Symposium 2011 | Nashville, TN Selection for Lifetime Production

PIC Symposium 2011 | Nashville, TN

PIC Commercial Female Performance

Page 18: PIC Symposium 2011 | Nashville, TN Selection for Lifetime Production

PIC Symposium 2011 | Nashville, TN

PIC Commercial Female Performance

Page 19: PIC Symposium 2011 | Nashville, TN Selection for Lifetime Production

PIC Symposium 2011 | Nashville, TN

Lifetime Production and EfficiencyTargeting and Delivering the Key Drivers

Number Born AliveTotal BornStillborn %

PreWeaning ThroughputPiglet Survival - SowPiglet Survival - PigletBirth WeightWeaning WeightTeat NumberDefects

Litters / Sow / YearWean-to-Effective Service IntervalGestation LengthLactation Length

Lifetime EfficiencyAge at Effective MatingSow MortalityInvoluntary Culling / StructureFeed Utilization

Data currently captured in PIC genetic improvement program

Page 20: PIC Symposium 2011 | Nashville, TN Selection for Lifetime Production

PIC Symposium 2011 | Nashville, TN

Camborough Potential

Page 21: PIC Symposium 2011 | Nashville, TN Selection for Lifetime Production

PIC Symposium 2011 | Nashville, TN

Example of Lifetime Performance

Page 22: PIC Symposium 2011 | Nashville, TN Selection for Lifetime Production

PIC Symposium 2011 | Nashville, TN

Sow #4421

Parity 1– 114 days gestation– P1 18TB 16BA

140 Days to Parity 2– 19TB 19BA

143 Days to Parity 3– 22TB 20BA

139 Days to Parity 4– 18TB 18BA

140 days to Parity 5– 17TB 17BA

144 days to Parity 6– 26TB 26BA…25 weaned

Lifetime Performance (so far)• 820 days of herd life• 120 pigs Born• 116 Pigs Born Alive

• 0.146 pigs TB per day in farm• 0.141 pigs BA per day in farm

53.3 pigs TB/sow/yr51.1 pigs BA/sow/yr