phys1220 – quantum mechanics
DESCRIPTION
PHYS1220 – Quantum Mechanics. Lecture 4 August 27, 2002 Dr J. Quinton Office: PG 9 ph 49-21-7025 [email protected]. The Correspondence Principle. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
27 August, 2002 1
School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences PHYS1220School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences PHYS1220
PHYS1220 – Quantum Mechanics
Lecture 4August 27, 2002
Dr J. QuintonOffice: PG 9 ph [email protected]
27 August, 2002 2
School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences PHYS1220School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences PHYS1220
The Correspondence PrincipleAny theory must match the well-known laws of classical physics if the conditions match the classical case. This is known as The Correspondence PrincipleRecall from special relativity that when v<<c, the theory must simplify to Newtonian physics eg relativistic kinetic energy becomes
if you take the expansion and make v<<c
In Quantum Mechanics, the same applies in going from microscopic to macroscopic situations (ie when the system >> de Broglie )As the quantum number, n, approaches infinity, any real system should behave in a way that is consistent with classical physics Eg in the Bohr model, the discrete energy levels En get closer and
closer together and as n→, they essentially become ‘continuous’
The same applies for rn and L as n→. The exercise is left to the student
21KE mc 21
2KE mv
1lim 0n nn
E E
2 4
2 2 20
1
8n
Z e mE
h n
27 August, 2002 3
School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences PHYS1220School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences PHYS1220
Quantum MechanicsBohr’s model contained a remarkable mixture of classical and quantum concepts, thus it provoked much thought about the wave nature of matter, light and the laws of how they interact with one another
This led to the development of a comprehensive theory to describe microscopic phenomena, started independently in (1925) by Werner Heisenberg (Matrix mechanics, Nobel Prize 1932)
Heisenberg’s approach employs matrices and matrix functions and although very powerful, is mathematically complicated and less suitable for teaching elementary concepts.
Erwin Schrödinger (Wave mechanics, Nobel Prize 1933) Schrödinger’s approach uses multivariable functions and
operators. Their approaches were very different from one another but
their theories are fully compatible
27 August, 2002 4
School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences PHYS1220School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences PHYS1220
The Uncertainty PrincipleEvery measurement has an associated uncertaintyAccording to classical physics, there is no limit to the ultimate refinement of the apparatus or measuring procedure It is possible to determine everything to infinite precision
Quantum Theory predicts otherwise. With his matrix mechanics, Heisenberg showed the existence of what is called the Heisenberg Uncertainty PrincipleIf a measurement of position is made with precision x and a simultaneous measurement of momentum component px is made with precision px, then
It is fundamentally impossible to simultaneously measure the exact position and exact momentum of a particle
Other uncertainty relations are
xx p
L E t
27 August, 2002 5
School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences PHYS1220School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences PHYS1220
Uncertainty Principle ExampleA ‘thought’ experiment of Heisenberg’s Suppose you want to simultaneously measure the
position and momentum of an electron as precisely as possible with a powerful light microscope
In order to determine the electron’s location (ie making x small ~ ) at least one photon of light (with momentum h/ must be scattered (as in (a))
But the photon imparts an unknown amount of its momentum to the electron (as in (b)), thus altering it’s path and speed! ie p ~ h/ becomes larger!
The very light that allows you to determine the position changes the momentum by some undeterminable amount
In making measurements on microscopic scales, you must now appreciate that you cannot make a measurement without interacting with the very thing that you are attempting to measure!
So x p ~ h
27 August, 2002 6
School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences PHYS1220School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences PHYS1220
27 August, 2002 7
School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences PHYS1220School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences PHYS1220
Is the Bohr Model Realistic?Question: According to the Bohr model, the electron in the ground state moves in a circular orbit with the Bohr radius r1=0.529x10-10m, at a speed of 2.2x106 ms-1 (check it for yourself!). In view of the HUP, is the model realistic?Answer: Because the model assumes that the electron is located at r1, the uncertainty r is zero. If the magnitude of the total momentum of the electron is mv, then the radial component of momentum must be less than or equal to this value
According to the uncertainty principle, the minimum uncertainty in the radial position is therefore
which is ~ r1! so the Bohr model is not realistic
31 6 1 24 1(9.11x10 )(2.2x10 . ) 2.0x10 . .rp mv kg m s kg m s
3410
min 24 1
1.05x10 .0.525x10
2.0x10 . .r
J sr m
p kg m s
27 August, 2002 8
School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences PHYS1220School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences PHYS1220
Philosophical ImplicationsNewtonian physics is completely deterministic. If you know the configuration of a system at any point in time then
you can predict its future and also extrapolate its pastQuantum mechanics (QM) has drastically altered our viewpoint Because the wave nature dominates on atomic scales, we must
relinquish determinism and accept a probabilistic approach. The expected position of a microscopic particle (such as an electron
that is moving around a nucleus) can only be predicted by calculating a probability, which in turn indicates an expected statistical average over many measurements.
Even macroscopic objects that are made up of many atoms are governed by probability rather than strict determinism. eg QM predicts a finite (though negligibly small) probability that an
thrown object (comprising many atoms) will suddenly curve upward rather than follow a parabolic trajectory
However when large numbers of objects are present in a statistical situation, deviations from the most probable approach zero, and thus obey classical laws with very high probability, giving rise to an apparent ‘determinism’
Many people opposed this but ultimately had to accept it. At the time Einstein believed that “God does not play dice with the universe”
27 August, 2002 9
School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences PHYS1220School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences PHYS1220The Wave Function and its Interpretation
In Quantum Mechanics, each object (particle or the system itself) is represented by a ‘matter wave’ and is described by a (unique) wave function, (x,y,z,t). The wavelength is established by de Broglie, but what is the physical meaning of the amplitude?One way to interpret the wave function is that it plays the same role that the electric field vector plays in the wave theory of light Recall that Intensity (Amplitude)2
In a similar way, 2 represents an ‘intensity’ or alternatively, the probability of detecting the object with wave function The magnitude of the wave function (itself generally a complex
quantity) may vary in x,y,z or t, but the probability of detecting the particle will be greater where and/or when the amplitude is large.
If represents a single electron (say in an atom) then the value of ||2dV at a certain point in space and time represents the probability of finding the electron within the volume dV about the given position at that time – Max Born, 1928 (Nobel Prize 1954)
27 August, 2002 10
School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences PHYS1220School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences PHYS1220
Properties of Wave FunctionsWave functions of particles must possess certain properties to be useful quantum mechanically. The function must be continuousThe function must be differentiablethe particle exists and so the the probability of finding it throughout all of space must be equal to 1. When this is the case, the function is said to be ‘normalised.’ A function must be normalised for the probability to make sense. eg the probability of detecting an electron with a
wave function between x=a and x=b is determined by
Expectation values, < >. The expectation value of any quantity is the statistical average after many measurements of the quantity are made. For example, the expectation value of position <x> is given by
21dV
2b
a
dV
2x x dx
27 August, 2002 11
School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences PHYS1220School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences PHYS1220
Eigenvalues and EigenfunctionsConsider
In this example, the derivative is an operator on the function f(x). Because the function f(x) is returned (multiplied by a constant) after it is acted on by the derivative operator, f(x) is said to be an eigenfunction of the derivative operator Or more specifically in this case, the exponential function is an
eigenfunction of the derivative operator
The constant that is returned as a multiplier of an eigenfunction is called its eigenvalue
Here, the constant k is an eigenvalue of the eigenfunction f (x).
Question: is an eigenvector of the 2nd derivative?
( ) kxf x Ae
( ) ( ) ( )kxdg x f x k Ae k f x
dx
( ) kxf x Ae
27 August, 2002 12
School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences PHYS1220School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences PHYS1220
Recall from wave theory that any travelling wave can be represented mathematically by
where k is the angular wavenumber, the angular frequency,
A is the amplitude and 0 is an initial phase
Therefore both momentum and energy are contained in the terms describing the wave
Waves Revisited
0( , ) sin( )y x t A kx t
2
2
h hp k
0( , ) sinp E
y x t A x t
22
hE hf f
Now, noticing that
and
then the wave can be expressed by
27 August, 2002 13
School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences PHYS1220School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences PHYS1220
The Schrödinger EquationThe Schrödinger equation cannot be derived from first principles. It appears as a postulate, just as Newton’s second law doesWe will consider only one dimensional, steady state problems (where and the potential U are only a function of spatial x and independent of time). The 1-D Time-Independent Schrödinger Equation (T.I.S.E.) is
where m is the mass of the particleThe equation is essentially the total energy of the particle
2 2
2
( )( ) ( ) ( )
2
d xU x x E x
m dx
2 2 2
2 2tot
p kE KE PE U U E
m m
27 August, 2002 14
School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences PHYS1220School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences PHYS1220
The Schrödinger Equation II
The T.I.S.E. is based upon conservation of energy, so all 1-D time-independent systems must obey itNote that the T.I.S.E. is an operator equation, however.The wave function of any real object must be an eigenfunction of Schrödinger’s equation, with its corresponding eigenvalue equal to the object’s energy, E. In other words, once you know the eigenfunction of a
particle (or its state) you can just substitute it into Schrödinger’s equation to calculate the energy
Well that is quite a bit of theory, now let’s use it for some simple situations
27 August, 2002 15
School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences PHYS1220School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences PHYS1220
Free ParticlesThe simplest wave function to describe is that of a free particle. It does not have any potential acting on it and therefore no forces.The T.I.S.E. is therefore
Which can be written
This is the second order differential equation for a harmonic oscillator with general solution
Note that k can have any value (ie the energy can be chosen from a continuous range). Note also that px is zero, so x →
2 2
2
( )( )
2
d xE x
m dx
2
2 2
( ) 20
d x mE
dx
2( ) sin cos ,
mEx A kx B kx k
2 2 2
21
2 2 2
p kE mv
m m
27 August, 2002 16
School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences PHYS1220School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences PHYS1220
Free Particles IIGiven the wave function, let’s substitute it back into the T.I.S.E.
So
If we had guessed the wave function, we could have computed the energy of the free particle (and how it depends upon k)That is a simple example of the power of Schrödinger’s equation
( ) sin cosx A kx B kx
2 2 2
22
22
( )sin cos
2 2
( ) ( )2
d xk A kx B kx
m dx m
k x E xm
22 2,or alternatively
2
mEE k k
m
27 August, 2002 17
School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences PHYS1220School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences PHYS1220
Wave PacketsTo represent a particle that is well localised (ie its position is known to be within a small region of space), we use the concept of a wave-packet
To describe this requires a wave function that is the sum of many sinusoidal plane waves of slightly different wavelengths (cf beats). The smaller the value of x, the more terms are
needed in the sum.
Because each term in the sum has a unique wavelength (and therefore momentum), the sum does not have a definite momentum. Rather, it has a range of momenta, so px is non-zero