php400,000,000.00 national economic and … · 1 ra 9003, an act providing for an ecological solid...

of 29

Feasibility Study for the Appropriate Waste-to-Energy (WTE) Technology

covering 178 Local Government Units (LGUs) in the Manila Bay Region

Terms of Reference (TOR)

for the

Conduct of the Feasibility Study (F/S) for the Appropriate Waste-to-Energy (WTE)

Technology covering 178 Local Government Units (LGUs) in the Manila Bay Region

1. BACKGROUND/RATIONALE

1.1 Contracting Authority

The 2014 General Appropriations Act (GAA) has allocated the amount of

PhP400,000,000.00 for the conduct of F/S for non-public-private partnership

projects in the pipeline to be administered by the National Economic and

Development Authority (NEDA). NEDA shall be the Executing Agency and

contracting party while DENR-EMB shall be the Implementing Agency. The

proposed project is consistent with DENR-EMB’s major plans and programs,

particularly in formulating/developing strategic policies for better solid waste

management and in assisting LGUs in the availment/use of alternative

technologies for waste disposals.

1.2 Relevant Country / Sector Context

To improve the management of solid wastes in the country, Republic Act (RA)

No. 9003, otherwise known as the Ecological Solid Waste Management Act

(ESWMA)1, was enacted. However, despite the enactment of the Law, 923 open

and controlled dumpsites are still operating nationwide. The dumpsites, which are

generally classified as unmanaged or poorly managed, should have already been

closed and/or rehabilitated. At present, only 72 sanitary landfills (SLFs) are in

operation, serving 137 LGUs nationwide. This number is relatively small

compared to the more than 1,600 cities and municipalities in the Philippines. Due

to the high upfront costs for the development of Solid Waste Management (SWM)

facilities, which limit the capacity of LGUs in investing in such projects, there is a

need for the National Government (NG) to start-up the implementation of SWM

approaches towards increasing the service coverage of SWM facilities to more

LGUs.

The condition of the Manila Bay has worsened over the years due to the increasing

pollution load carried by rivers draining into the Bay, exacerbated by the

mismanagement of solid wastes. This has prompted the Supreme Court, through its

18 December 2008 decision, to issue a mandamus ordering relevant government

agencies, in coordination with the concerned LGUs surrounding the Manila Bay, to

clean up, rehabilitate and preserve the Bay. Furthermore, DENR, as the primary

government agency mandated to conserve, manage and develop the country’s

1 RA 9003, An Act Providing for an Ecological Solid Waste Management Program, Creating the Necessary

Institutional Mechanisms and Incentives, Declaring Certain Acts Prohibited and Providing Penalties,

Appropriating Funds Therefor, and for Other Purposes, 26 January 2001,

<http://www.lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2001/ra_9003_2001.html>.

of 29



environment and natural resources2, was directed to fully implement its

Operational Plan for the Manila Bay Coastal Strategy as well as to spearhead the

implementation of activities/interventions related to the cleanup, rehabilitation and

protection of the Manila Bay area.

With the need to study appropriate SWM measures and in compliance with the

continuing mandamus, DENR intends to immediately pursue SWM interventions

in the Manila Bay region to improve its water quality and condition and to ensure a

renewable and sustainable means of addressing the SWM problems in the region.

Since methane (a by-product of SLFs) has high potential to be converted into

energy, provided that its percentage in the landfill gas is enough to be processed by

power generators, DENR is exploring the possibility of adopting certain WTE

technologies as solutions to the SWM issue. However, past case studies show that

the WTE potential for new SLFs are limited by RA 9003 since the Act encourages

the diversion of biodegradable wastes from disposal facilities. As such, there is a

need to undertake a comprehensive study on the exploration of WTE solutions for

SWM problems in the country taking into consideration institutional, legal and

technical limits.

1.3 Current State of the Relevant Sector

Despite the effectivity of RA 9003 since 2001, the LGUs’ compliance with the

mandates of the Law is still very low. Moreso, finding suitable disposal sites for

SWM could be a challenge especially in highly urbanized cities (HUCs) and/or

urbanizing cities. LGU interventions, such as Materials Recovery Facilities

(MRFs), source reduction, and the likes, have already been implemented; however,

majority of the established MRFs, with composting and recycling components, are

in an “On and Off” operation. There is actually no continuity in the efforts initiated

by some LGUs, except perhaps those implemented by some non-government and

private entities. Based on the National Solid Waste Management Commission

(NSWMC) database, about 9,219 out of 42,000 barangays today have access to

MRFs in the country. For the LGUs in Metro Manila, an average of 42.0%

diversion rate has been achieved through source reduction, composting and

recycling while the rest of the LGUs in the country only reported a 36.9% average

diversion rate. This limitation has been a deterrent factor to the participation of

recycling industries, whose businesses rely on the steady supply of usable waste

materials.

The pressing concern on the increasing volume of wastes produced, its undeniable

impact on climate change, and the relatively unsustainable SWM interventions

among LGUs are some of the reasons why the Government should push for the

adoption of the appropriate WTE technologies to complement SLFs in the country.

WTE technologies will convert wastes into a genuine resource-generating and

sustainable renewable energy with minimal residues brought to SLFs, thus,

extending the latter’s life spans and minimizing land requirements for such.

2 Pursuant to Section 4 of Executive Order (EO) No. 192 (1987), which provides for the reorganization of

DENR, and Section 19 of RA 9275, otherwise known as the Clean Water Act of 2004, which delegates the

DENR as lead agency in the implementation and enforcement of a Comprehensive Water Quality

Management.

of 29



1.4 Related Projects/Programs and Other Donor Activities

The following projects may complement the proposed F/S under this TOR:

1.4.1 Solid Waste Management Sector Project (SWMSP). The project, which

is now on its preparatory stage, aims to support SWM in the Philippines

by assisting LGUs through investments in related infrastructures,

complemented with technical assistance for capacity development. The

Project covers three (3) pilot LGUs to showcase appropriate models for

SWM in highly urbanized regions, tourist destination areas and cluster of

municipalities. The Asian Development Bank (ADB) loan, however, is

not specifically intended for the determination of WTE approaches but

more on opening a finance window for the waste sector in general; and

1.4.2 Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions (NAMA) Support Project.

The goal of the NAMA Support Project, which is a pipeline project of

NSWMC in partnership with the Deutsche Gesellschaft für

Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH, is for the waste sector to

contribute to the Philippines’ transition towards a low carbon

development path as enshrined in the “Mitigation Pillar” of the National

Framework Strategy on Climate Change (NFSCC) and anchored on

strategies that offer the most co-benefits to stimulate sustainable

development. The collaboration focuses on opening a concessional

finance window for all LGUs and private entities that intend to

implement waste management projects with established and verifiable

greenhouse gases (GHG) mitigation impacts. While WTE projects could

be considered under NAMA, only certain WTE schemes could be pilot-

tested under the same, such as, inter alia, anaerobic digestion or

methane-to-electricity schemes.

2. OBJECTIVE, PURPOSE & EXPECTED RESULTS

2.1 Overall Objective of the Study

2.1.1 To provide a comprehensive basis for the establishment, development,

promotion, implementation and monitoring of WTE technologies

appropriate for the Manila Bay region, taking into consideration the

technical, financial, socio-political, legal and institutional factors. This

also includes the adoption of appropriate WTE technologies based on its

contribution in achieving the waste diversion goal as indicated in the

2011-2016 Philippine Development Plan (PDP), with the value-added

process of energy generation;

The results of the proposed F/S should serve as a catalyst for the public

sector to implement SWM in a holistic, economical and efficient manner.

The Study should be able to determine the most appropriate WTE

technologies for the Philippines, and in particular, the LGUs in the Manila

Bay area, that would help reduce the amount of residual waste delivered to

existing landfills. It shall serve as a test case to achieve an improved

of 29



waste management system through reuse, recycling, composting and

other resource recovery activities by 2016; and

2.1.2 To contribute to meeting national renewable energy targets, with positive

impact on the environment, relative to SWM in the country.

2.2 Specific Objective/s

2.2.1 To conduct a full-blown and comprehensive F/S for the determination of

the most appropriate WTE scheme/s and/or system/s for the Manila Bay

region, i.e., cutting across NCR, Regions III and IV-A, including:

2.2.1.1 Undertaking a complete Waste Analysis and Characterization

Study (WACS) for the LGUs in the Manila Bay area, consistent

with DENR standards;

2.2.1.2 Determining, through Value Analysis (VA) / Options Analysis3,

the most appropriate and cost-effective WTE scheme/s and/or

system/s that are technically, socially, financially and economically

viable for a type of LGU, or a cluster of LGUs, in the coverage area

based on, but not limited to, the following: volume and

characteristics of wastes, space and logistical requirements, air and

hazardous emissions monitoring system requirements and required

operator competencies, LGU capacity and capitalization

(institutional), legal and social parameters, and type of energy

produced; and

2.2.1.3 Developing a decision planning tool, e.g., software or program, that

can be used to determine the viability of a WTE system based on a

given set of parameters;

2.2.2 To conduct a workshop on the use of the planning tool and provide on-the-

job capacity-building and technology transfer to relevant Government

technical personnel who shall be detailed to the Study; and

2.2.3 To provide recommendations that will optimize the use and application of

WTE technologies in the Philippines.

2.3 Expected Result/s

2.3.1 The Study should be able to produce the comprehensive WACS that will

cover 178 LGUs in the Manila Bay area. A list of the 178 LGUs is

attached, to form part of this TOR, as Annex A.

2.3.2 By the end of the contract period under this TOR, the Consulting Firm is

expected to produce a full and comprehensive F/S that will recommend,

among others, the following:

3 In undertaking the VA/Options Analysis as a component of the scope of work for the F/S, the Consulting

Firm shall be guided by the Value Analysis Handbook for NEDA (2009), which may be downloaded from

<http://www.neda.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Value-Analysis-Handbook.pdf>.

of 29



2.3.2.1 A comprehensive, comparative evaluation of all WTE technologies

applicable/appropriate for the Philippines, with clear definitions

and detailed descriptions, including recommendations that will

optimize the use and application of WTE technologies in the

country;

2.3.2.2 Most appropriate and cost-effective WTE scheme/s and/or system/s

(i.e., an applicable technology or a combination of technologies) for

the 178 LGUs or a cluster of LGUs in the Manila Bay region that

are technically, socially, institutionally, financially and

economically sound, including, but not limited to, the preliminary

designs of said system/s, corresponding cost estimates,

implementation arrangements, and the most appropriate financing

scheme; and

2.3.2.3 A decision planning tool, e.g., software or program, that can be

used to determine the viability of a WTE system based on a given

set of parameters. This tool may be utilized by relevant

stakeholders for succeeding WTE projects.

2.3.3 The Consulting Firm should be able to conduct a workshop on the use of

the planning tool and provide on-the-job capacity-building and

technology transfer to relevant Government technical personnel, e.g.,

from NEDA and DENR, who shall be detailed to the Study.

3. SCOPE OF WORKS

3.1 Conduct of a full-blown and comprehensive F/S for the determination of the

most appropriate and cost-effective WTE scheme/s and/or system/s for the

Manila Bay region, cutting across NCR, Regions III and IV-A covering 178

LGUs, determined through VA/Options Analysis

3.1.1 Assessment of the Current Situation. This includes, among others,

researching on and comprehensively presenting the existing waste

management methodologies, or the lack thereof, in the Philippines, i.e.,

SLFs, WTE technologies, etc., and in particular, within the Manila Bay

region covering the 178 LGUs, as well as those internationally accepted

and/or practiced;

3.1.2 Data Collection. This covers, among others, area profiling, detailed waste

production trends/characterization, researching on available WTE

technologies, conduct of relevant surveys, etc. necessary for the Study as

well as the conduct of comprehensive WACS for the concerned LGUs,

consistent with DENR standards, which shall serve, among others, as

primary data for the determination of the appropriate WTE technologies for

the target LGUs in the Manila Bay area;

3.1.3 VA/Options Analysis. This includes a comprehensive study and

comparative evaluation of all possible WTE technologies (or a

combination of technologies) as options for managing municipal solid

of 29



wastes (MSWs), taking into consideration, among others, the unique

situations/conditions of various cities, municipalities or metropolitan

clusters in the Manila Bay area and the accompanying technical,

environmental, logistical, socio-political, legal, regulatory and institutional

requirements therein as well as the general financial and economic

feasibility. The Consulting Firm should be able to determine the most

appropriate and cost-effective WTE system/scheme for the LGUs in the

Manila Bay region. The suggested scope of the comprehensive and

comparative analysis of the different WTE technologies for solid waste

processing, treatment and energy generation is attached as Annex B;

3.1.4 Technical Analysis. A further technical analysis shall be undertaken for the

recommended scheme/s and/or system/s, providing details on the LGU

clustering (if necessary), proposed location of the facility/ies, overall

technical design/s of the WTE system/s (complete with drawings, etc.), its

operations and other requirements. The study should also include an

analysis of the by-products/emissions of the proposed plants and include in

the proposed design the necessary emissions/effluent control mechanisms,

among others. The Consulting Firm shall also determine the type of

energy to be produced/energy potential based on WACS and the possible

off-takers of the supplied energy;

3.1.5 Financial and Economic Analyses. The financial and economic analyses

shall be undertaken to determine the viability/feasibility of the proposed

scheme/s and/or system/s. This shall include the

identification/determination of the financial and economic costs and

benefits of the project as well as the determination of the resulting financial

and economic indicators, i.e., internal rate of returns (IRRs), net present

values (NPVs), etc.4 A detailed breakdown of the cost estimates should be

provided;

3.1.6 Institutional Analysis. A comprehensive analysis on the institutional and

legal aspects of the project is to be undertaken. The Consulting Firm shall

determine the most appropriate institutional set-up for the project’s

successful implementation and operation, which reaps the highest benefits,

noting the involvement of multiple institutions, i.e., DENR, LGUs and the

potential power up-takers, among others;

3.1.7 Social Analysis. A comprehensive analysis on the social aspects of the

project, including, but not limited to, the social acceptability of the

proposed waste collection mechanisms and corresponding fees, if any; and

3.1.8 Other components of the F/S such as, but not limited to, the necessary

Environmental and Risk Analyses.

3.2 Development of a decision planning tool that can determine the viability of a

WTE system based on a given set of parameters

4 The Social Discount Rate (SDR) to be used for the economic analysis is 15 percent, as prescribe by the

Project Development Evaluation Manual (PDEM).

of 29



3.2.1 The Consulting Firm shall determine the set of basic parameters for the

program and develop a decision planning tool, e.g., software or program,

which can determine the viability of a WTE system based on the given set

of parameters. DENR/NSWMC/concerned LGUs and other relevant

stakeholders should be able to use this planning tool as a guide in the

determination of the appropriate WTE scheme/s and/or system/s for

succeeding WTE projects; and

3.2.2 The Consulting Firm shall conduct a capacity-building workshop for

DENR, NEDA and other relevant stakeholders on the use of the tool.

3.3. Conduct of capacity-building and technology transfer for Government on-

the-job technical personnel

The Consulting Firm shall accommodate at least two (2) Government on-the-job

technical personnel, e.g., from NEDA and DENR, who shall be detailed to the

Study for the purpose of capacity-building and technology transfer.

4. TIMELINES AND DELIVERABLES

4.1. Commencement Date & Period of Implementation

The Study shall be undertaken within a period of Eight (8) Months, commencing

on the date of receipt of the Notice to Proceed (NTP).

4.2. Table of Deliverables

4.2.1 The Consulting Firm shall submit a Monthly Progress Report to NEDA

and DENR within seven (7) calendar days from end of agreed month-

period. The Monthly Progress Reports shall include, among others, updates

on the physical and financial accomplishments of each of the activities

under the Detailed Work and Financial Plan, difficulties encountered, and

measures taken to overcome them.

4.2.2 The deliverables for the subject Study as enumerated below shall be

submitted by the Consulting Firm in four (4) hard copies to DENR for

review and two (2) hard copies to NEDA for monitoring purposes and/or

payment processing. An electronic/soft copy shall also be submitted to

DENR/NEDA on the date/period specified hereunder:

DELIVERABLES TIMELINE

Detailed Work and Financial Plan:

The detailed Work and Financial Plan shall describe the

approach and methodologies for the conduct of WACS, from

sampling plan preparation to the actual conduct of WACS,

including laboratory analytical protocols to be used in data

collection, among others, consistent with the DENR standards

Within 10 calendar days

from the date of receipt

of the NTP

of 29



for WACS;

The detailed Work and Financial Plan shall also describe the

approach and methodologies for the comprehensive study and

comparative evaluation of all possible WTE technologies that

are applicable to cities or cluster of cities and municipalities in

the Manila Bay region, covering, but not limited to, the

suggested scope provided under Annex B. This includes the

proposed approach and methodology for the conduct of the

VA/Options Analysis in determining the most appropriate and

cost-effective WTE technologies for the region, guided by the

Value Analysis Handbook;

The detailed Work and Financial Plan shall include the

resources deployment plan for each of the above activities and

the financial requirements for the same;

The detailed Work and Financial Plan shall further outline the

proposed program for the on-the-job capacity-building and

technology transfer of the Government technical personnel

detailed to the Study; and

The detailed Work and Financial Plan shall include the

proposed schedule, i.e., Gantt chart, for all activities/programs

of work necessary for the delivery of the intended outputs of

the Study, including, but not limited to, the conduct of WACS,

VA/Options Analysis, field works related to applicable tasks,

workshop for the use of the planning tool, and the on-the-job

capacity-building program.

NEDA/DENR shall

provide comments, if

any, on the Draft Work

and Financial Plan

within 4 calendar days

from receipt thereof; the

Consulting Firm shall

finalize the revised

Work and Financial Plan

(taking into

consideration /

incorporating the

comments from

NEDA/DENR)

Draft Inception Report:

The Draft Inception Report shall include, among others, the

approved Detailed Work and Financial Plan and the description

of the corresponding activities/programs of work/milestones

already accomplished/fulfilled by the date of submission thereof,

as well as the fulfilment of the study conditions enumerated

herein and/or the approaches and methodologies to be utilized in

the development of the Study.

Within 6 weeks from the

approval of the Detailed

Work and Financial Plan

NEDA/DENR shall


any, on the Draft

Inception Report within

7 calendar days from

receipt thereof

First Interim Report:

The Consulting Firm shall produce a First Interim Report that:

Integrates the preliminary results of the comparative analysis

of the different WTE Technologies for solid waste processing,

treatment and energy generation;

Integrates the list of potential sites; and


date of acceptance of the

Draft Inception Report

NEDA/DENR shall


any, on the First Interim

Report within 7 calendar

days from receipt

of 29



Integrate individual WACS data results.

Presentation to concerned/appropriate bodies, e.g., NSWMC.

thereof



First Interim Report

Second Interim Report:

The Consulting Firm shall produce a Second Interim Report,

which includes:

Updating of the status of implementation in relation to the

scope of work; and

Integration of the preliminary results of the VA/Options

Analysis/feasibility and applicability of the different WTE to

cities or cluster of LGUs.



First Interim Report

NEDA/DENR shall


any, on the Second

Interim Report within 7

calendar days from

receipt thereof

Draft Final Report:

The Consulting Firm shall produce a Draft Final Report,

including a final presentation of each item in the scope of work

and the detailed WTE Feasibility Studies in the Manila Bay

region (first versions).

The Consulting Firm shall submit the first version of the WTE

Feasibility Studies among the clustered LGUs with options

citing comparative analyses among different technologies.

Presentation to concerned/appropriate bodies, e.g., NSWMC.



Second Interim Report

NEDA/DENR shall

provide comments on

the Draft Final Report, if

any, within 7 calendar

days from receipt

thereof

Within 14 calendar days

from the date of

acceptance of the Draft

Final Report

Final Report:

The Consulting Firm shall produce a Final Report, including the

final versions of the detailed WTE Feasibility Studies in the

Manila Bay region.

Within 3 weeks from

acceptance of the

comments from

NEDA/DENR on the

Draft Final Report

5. EXPERTISE REQUIREMENTS AND QUALIFICATIONS

The Consulting Firm shall field-in a Team with the following composition and

qualifications:

5.1 Project Manager (1)

5.1.1 Must be a WTE expert with at least 10 years of professional experience

in the design, implementation and monitoring of WTE projects;

of 29



5.1.2 Must be a licensed engineer, preferably with a degree in civil, chemical,

mechanical, energy or environmental engineering;

5.1.3 Must also have an excellent technical and planning background; and

5.1.4 Preferred skills include project management, technical writing, capacity-

building, facilitation, and project implementation.

5.2 Senior SWM Specialist (1)

5.2.1 Must have at least five (5) years of professional experience in planning,

designing, evaluating, implementing and upscaling technologies and

approaches on municipal solid waste management as well as in SWM

monitoring;

5.2.2 Must have at least a bachelor’s degree in engineering, sciences or any

related discipline;

5.2.3 Must have technical expertise in scoping and evaluating the technical

and environmental merits of SWM systems;

5.2.3. Preferred skills include technical writing, capacity-building, facilitation,

and project implementation; and

5.2.4. Involvement in development of national policy/ies related to SWM or

supporting guidelines is a plus.

5.3. Senior WTE Specialist (1)

5.3.1 Must have at least five (5) years of professional experience in planning,

designing, evaluating, implementing and monitoring WTE projects;


related discipline;


and environmental merits of waste-to-energy systems;

5.3.4 Preferred skills include technical writing, capacity building, facilitation,

and project implementation; and

5.3.5 Involvement in development of national policy/ies related to WTE or

supporting guidelines is a plus.

5.4 SWM and/or WTE Junior Specialists (4)

5.4.1 Must have at least three (3) years of professional experience in planning,

evaluating, implementing and upscaling technologies and approaches on

municipal SWM with experience in WTE planning, designing,

implementation and monitoring;

of 29




related discipline;


and environmental merits of WTE systems; and

5.4.4 Involvement in development of national policy/ies related to SWM/WTE

or supporting guidelines is a plus.

5.5 Financial Specialist (1)

5.5.1 Must have at least three (3) years of experience in the financial analysis

of urban infrastructure projects, preferably with a background on the

financial analysis of SWM and/or WTE projects;

5.5.2 Must have at least a bachelor’s degree in finance, accountancy or any

related discipline; and

5.5.3 Must be knowledgeable on, but not limited to, cost recovery

mechanisms, national-local government sharing scheme and climate

financing for SWM.

5.6 Economic Specialist (1)

5.6.1 Must have at least three (3) years of experience in economic analysis of

urban infrastructure projects, preferably with a background on the

economic analysis of SWM and/or WTE projects; and

5.6.2 Must have at least a bachelor’s degree in economics or any related

discipline.

5.7 Information Technology (IT) Specialist (1)

5.7.1 Must have at least three (3) years of experience in software

programming, database design and implementation, operating systems,

computer essentials and fundamentals, among others;

5.7.2 Must have at least a bachelor’s degree in computer engineering,

computer sciences, IT or any related discipline.

5.8 Other Specialists

The consultant shall employ other experts which he/she deems necessary for the

implementation of the Study to meet the deadline set for the Study.

At least one (1) of the senior consultants, preferably the Team Leader, must be

knowledgeable on VA/Options Analysis and have at least five (5) years of work

experience related thereto.

of 29



6. CRITERIA FOR SELECTION

6.1 The prospective Consultancy Firms must have at least 10 years of relevant

experience related to this TOR and will be rated based on the criteria as shown

in Annex C (Rating Table for Shortlisting of Consulting Firms). Prospective

bidders are required to submit the following:

6.1.1 Copies of Certificate of Project Completion and Acceptance or

equivalent Certification from their previous related studies/projects

within the past five (5) years;

6.1.2 Company profile; and

6.1.3 Curriculum Vitae (CV) of key experts highlighting their relevant work

experience.

Note: Related experiences/studies include conduct of pre-FS and/or FS for the Team

Leader and relevant work experience as stated in item 7.1.1. for the WTE Expert;

and the key experts requested to indicate 1) his/her role in a specific project, 2)

the exact duration that they have worked on the project; and 3) a brief

description of the tasks that they have carried out (e.g., experience in the conduct

of VE/VA).

6.2 The Consulting Firm shall be selected using the Quality-Cost Based Selection

procedure under Republic Act (RA) 9184 (Government Procurement Reform

Act) and its Revised Implementing Rules and Regulations (IRR) and shall be

based on the following criteria: 80% Technical Proposal and 20% Financial

Proposal.

6.3 The prospective Consulting Firms shall follow the Guidelines in the Preparation

of Eligibility Requirements as attached in Annex D of this TOR.

7 SOURCE OF FUNDS

Funds for the conduct of the Study will be sourced from the F/S Fund being

administered by NEDA.

8 INSTITUTIONAL SET-UP / RESPONSIBILITIES

8.1 Executing Agency / NEDA

8.1.1 Shall be the Executing Agency (i.e., representative of the Government in

the Contract Agreement with the Consulting Firm);

8.1.2 Shall, through its NEDA Bids and Awards Committee (NBAC), be

responsible for facilitating the bidding and tendering of the consultancy

services in compliance with RA 9184 and its Revised IRR with the

Implementing Agency as End-User;

of 29



8.1.3 Shall be responsible for the disbursement of the fund for the conduct of

the F/S once the contract becomes executed;

8.1.4 Shall reimburse or pay in behalf of the Consulting Firm for amounts paid

on account of all taxes, duties, levies and other impositions under the

laws and regulations of the Philippines or any political subdivision or

agency thereof (other than personnel who are citizens or permanent

residents of the Philippines), in respect of any payment made to the

Consulting Firm in connection with the carrying out of the services;

8.1.5 Shall be responsible for the preparation and submission of financial

reports as required by the Department of Budget and Management

(DBM) and other reportorial requirements regarding the F/S Fund

administration; and

8.1.6 Shall detail counterpart technical personnel to the Study for the purpose

of on-the-job capacity-building and technology transfer.

8.2 Implementing Agency / DENR

8.2.1 Shall be the beneficiary/End-User of the consultancy services;

8.2.2 Shall be responsible for contract implementation and management,

including ensuring the quality of outputs. Further, the Implementing

Agency shall be responsible for the monitoring and evaluation of the

progress of the Study and approval of reports to ensure delivery of

outputs as specified in Sections 2, 3 and 4 of this TOR;

8.2.3 Shall provide assistance in coordination with other agencies related to

the Study;

8.2.4 Shall warrant that the Consulting Firm shall have free and unimpeded

access to all lands and properties for the effective execution of the

services. Likewise, DENR shall be responsible for any damage to such

land or any property thereon resulting from such access (unless such

damage is caused by the wilful default or negligence of the Consulting

Firm or its staffs);

8.2.5 Shall provide the Consulting Firm the necessary/available

information/data and also, if available, copies of previous related studies;

8.2.6 Shall evaluate all request for payments/billings and endorse to NEDA

upon determination of the acceptability/correctness of the same;

8.2.7 Shall report to NEDA the progress (physical and financial) of the Study

on a quarterly basis for monitoring purposes; and

8.2.8 Shall detail counterpart technical personnel to the Study for the purpose

of on-the-job capacity-building and technology transfer.

of 29



8.3 Consulting Firm

8.3.1 Shall be responsible for the conduct of the Study and the timely delivery

of results/outputs as indicated under Sections 2, 3 and 4 of this TOR;

8.3.2 Shall be responsible for the provision of the necessary office space,

which shall be within close proximity to NEDA, for the key personnel

and support staffs as well as the Government’s detailed personnel,

including the necessary office equipment (i.e., computers, printers, office

supplies, etc.) for the conduct of the Study. All equipment procured or

used in the conduct of the Study shall be transferred to NEDA at the end

of the Study;

8.3.3 Shall shoulder all expenses required in the conduct of the Study,

including, among others, the travel costs and lodging of detailed

Government personnel during field visits, except for their salaries;

8.3.4 Shall (a) carry out the services with sound engineering theories and

practices to ensure that the final works will provide the most economical

and feasible development for the Study, (b) accept full responsibility for

the consultancy services to be performed under this TOR for which the

Consulting Firm is liable to DENR, (c) perform the works required in an

efficient and diligent manner and shall use its best effort to keep

reimbursable costs down to the possible minimum without impairing the

quality of services rendered; and (d) comply with, and strictly observe

any law regarding workmen’s health and safety, workmen’s welfare,

compensation for injuries, minimum wage, hours of labor and other

labor laws;

8.3.5 Shall (a) keep accurate and systematic records and accounts in respect of

the services in such form and detail as is customary and sufficient to

establish accurately that the costs and expenditures under this TOR have

been duly incurred; and (b) permit the duly authorized representatives of

the Government from time to time to inspect its records and accounts as

well as to audit the same;

8.3.6 Shall not assign nor sub-contract any part of the professional engineering

services under this TOR to any person or firm, except with prior written

consent of DENR. The approval by the Government to the assignment of

any part of said services or to the engagement by Consulting Firm of

sub-contractors to perform any part of the same shall not relieve the

Consulting Firm of any obligations under this TOR;

8.3.7 Shall, during or after the termination of the Study, limit its role to the

provision of the services and hereby disqualifies itself and any other

contractor, consulting engineer or manufacturer with which it is

associated or affiliated, from the provision of goods and services other

than the Services herein, except as DENR may otherwise agree;

of 29



8.3.8 Shall prohibit full-time foreign staff during his/her assignment under this

TOR to engage, directly or indirectly, either in his name or through the

Consulting Firm, in any business or professional activities in the

Philippines other than the performance of his duties or assignment under

this TOR;

8.3.9 Shall not, at any time, communicate to any person or entity any

information disclosed to the Consulting Firm for the purpose of this

services, nor shall the Consulting Firm make public any information as

to the recommendations formulated in the course of or as a result of the

services, except with prior consent of DENR;

8.3.10 Shall agree that nothing contained herein shall be construed as

establishing or creating between the Government and the Consulting

Firm, the relationship of employer and employee or principal and agent,

it being understood that the position of the Consulting Firm and anyone

else performing the services is that of an independent contractor;

8.3.11 Shall hold the Government free from any and all liabilities, suits, actions,

demands or damages arising from death or injuries to persons or

properties, or any loss resulting from or caused by said personnel

incident to or in connection with the services under this TOR. The

Consulting Firm shall agree to indemnify, protect and defend at its own

expense the Government and its agents from and against all actions,

claims and liabilities arising out of acts done by the Consulting Firm or

its staffs in the performance of the services, including the use of, or

violation of any copyrighted materials, patented invention, article or

appliance; and

8.3.12 Shall provide on-the-job capacity-building and technology transfer to the

Government’s technical personnel detailed to the Study.

9 APPROVED BUDGET FOR THE CONTRACT (ABC)

9.1 The ABC for the proposed F/S is FIFTY-THREE MILLION NINE

HUNDRED FORTY-FOUR THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED EIHTY and

00/100 PESOS ONLY (PhP53,944,980.00), inclusive of all applicable

government taxes and charges, professional fees, and other incidental and

administrative costs which shall be paid on a reimbursement basis (e.g., travel

expenses, communication expenses, office supplies/space and other expenses

deemed necessary for the completion of the Study as certified by the Executing

Agency). Attached, as Annex E, is the breakdown of the ABC.

9.2 Please note that the consulting contract shall be a fixed price contract. Any

extension of the contract time shall not involve any additional cost to the

Government.

9.3 All equipment, materials, etc., acquired for the Study shall be turned over to

NEDA at the conclusion of the Study.

of 29



10 PAYMENT SCHEME/SCHEDULE

10.1 Billing for reimbursable items shall be on a monthly basis, based on the actual

expenses incurred and supported by official receipts/documents, including the

monthly progress reports.

10.2 Billing for non-reimbursable items, including professional fees, shall be in

accordance with the following delivery schedule, subject to the usual

Government accounting and auditing requirements.

Upon acceptance of Inception Report 10%

Upon acceptance of First Interim Report 10%

Upon acceptance of Second Interim Report and WACS 30%

Upon acceptance of Draft Final Report and the first versions

of WTE evaluation 30%

Upon acceptance of the Final Report 20%

100%

10.3 An advance payment shall be made to cover mobilization costs, but shall not

exceed 10% of the contract amount, subject to the posting of an irrevocable

standby letter of credit issued by an entity acceptable to NEDA and of an equal

amount to the advance payment. The advance payment shall be repaid by the

Consulting Firm by deducting from his subsequent billings / payments such sum

as agreed upon during contract negotiations until fully liquidated within the

duration of the contract.

11 RETENTION PAYMENT

11.1 A retention payment of 10% shall be withheld. It shall be based on the total

amount due to the Consulting Firm prior to any deduction and shall be retained

from every progress payment until 50% of the value of Study, as determined by

NEDA, are completed. If, after 50% completion, the Study is satisfactorily done

and on schedule, no additional retention shall be made; otherwise, the 10%

retention shall be imposed.

11.2 The total “retention money” shall be due for release upon approval of the Final

Report. The Consulting Firm may, however, request the substitution of the

retention money for each progress billing with irrevocable standby letters of

credit from a commercial bank, bank guarantees or surety bonds callable on

demand, of amounts equivalent to the retention money substituted for and

acceptable to NEDA, provided that the project is on schedule and is

satisfactorily undertaken. Otherwise, the 10% retention shall be made. Said

irrevocable standby letters of credit, bank guarantees and/or surety bonds, to be

posted in favor of NEDA shall be valid for the duration of the contract.

12 LIQUIDATED DAMAGES

12.1 Where the Consulting Firm refuses or fails to satisfactorily complete the work

within the specified contract time, plus any time extension duly granted and is

of 29



hereby in default under the contract, the Consulting Firm shall pay NEDA for

liquidated damages, and not by way of penalty, an amount, as provided in the

conditions of contract, equal to at least one tenth (1 /10) of 1% of the cost of the

unperformed portion of the works for every day of delay. Should the amount of

liquidated damages reach 15% of the contract amount, NEDA shall, at its own

discretion, terminate the contract without prejudice to any further action it may

take to recover whatever losses incurred due to non-performance of the

Consulting Firm.

12.2 To be entitled to such liquidated damages, NEDA does not have to prove that it

has incurred actual damages. Such amount shall be deducted from any money

due or which may become due the Consulting Firm under the contract and/or

collect such liquidated damages from the retention money or other securities

posted by the Consulting Firm, whichever is convenient to NEDA.

of 29



ANNEX A

REGION PROVINCE NO. MUNICIPALITY/CITY Income City 1 DINALUPIHAN 1st

2 HERMOSA 1st

3 MARIVELES 1st

4 ORANI 1st

5 LIMAY 1st

6 ORION 2nd

7 ABUCAY 3rd

8 BAGAC 3rd

9 MORONG 3rd

10 PILAR 3rd

11 CITY OF BALANGA (Capital) 4th Component

12 SAMAL 4th

1 ANGAT 1st

2 BALAGTAS (BIGAA) 1st

3 BULACAN 1st

4 CITY OF SAN JOSE DEL MONTE 1st Component

5 HAGONOY 1st

6 MARILAO 1st

7 NORZAGARAY 1st

8 SAN RAFAEL 1st

9 DOÑA REMEDIOS TRINIDAD 1st

10 BALIUAG 1st

11 BOCAUE 1st

12 CALUMPIT 1st

13 GUIGUINTO 1st

14 PLARIDEL 1st

15 PULILAN 1st

16 SAN ILDEFONSO 1st

17 SAN MIGUEL 1st

18 SANTA MARIA 1st

19 BUSTOS 2nd

20 PANDI 2nd

21 OBANDO 2nd

22 CITY OF MALOLOS (Capital) 3rd Component

23 CITY OF MEYCAUAYAN 3rd Component

24 PAOMBONG 3rd

MANILA BAY REGION

3

BA

TA

AN

3

BU

LA

CA

N

of 29



REGION PROVINCE NO. MUNICIPALITY/CITY Income City 1 GENERAL TINIO (PAPAYA) 1st

2 GUIMBA 1st

3 PANTABANGAN 1st

4 SAN ANTONIO 1st

5 SAN LEONARDO 1st

6 SANTA ROSA 1st

7 CABANATUAN CITY 1st Component

8 TALAVERA 1st

9 CABIAO 1st

10 CARRANGLAN 1st

11 ALIAGA 2nd

12 JAEN 2nd

13 BONGABON 2nd

14 RIZAL 2nd

15 SAN ISIDRO 2nd

16 LAUR 3rd

17 LUPAO 3rd

18 SAN JOSE CITY 3rd Component

19 SANTO DOMINGO 3rd

20 ZARAGOZA 3rd

21 GABALDON (BITULOK & SABANI) 3rd

22 LICAB 4th

23 LLANERA 4th

24 SCIENCE CITY OF MUÑOZ 4th Component

25 PEÑARANDA 4th

26 QUEZON 4th

27 TALUGTUG 4th

28 CITY OF GAPAN 4th Component

29 GENERAL MAMERTO NATIVIDAD 4th

30 PALAYAN CITY (Capital) 5th Component

1 SAN SIMON -

2 MABALACAT CITY - Component

3 ANGELES CITY 1st Highly

4 MACABEBE 1st

5 MAGALANG 1st

6 MEXICO 1st

7 PORAC 1st

8 CITY OF SAN FERNANDO (Capital) 1st Component

9 APALIT 1st

10 ARAYAT 1st

11 CANDABA 1st

12 FLORIDABLANCA 1st

13 GUAGUA 1st

14 LUBAO 1st

15 MASANTOL 2nd

16 SAN LUIS 3rd

17 SANTA ANA 3rd

18 BACOLOR 3rd

19 MINALIN 4th

20 20. SANTA RITA 4th

21 21. SANTO TOMAS 4th

22 22. SASMUAN (Sexmoan) 4th

3

NU

EV

A E

CIJ

A

3

PA

MP

AN

GA

of 29



REGION PROVINCE NO. MUNICIPALITY/CITY Income City 1 CITY OF TARLAC (Capital) 1st Component

2 CAPAS 1st

3 CONCEPCION 1st

4 VICTORIA 2nd

5 2. BAMBAN 2nd

6 7. LA PAZ 2nd

1 CITY OF DASMARIÑAS - Component

2 BACOOR CITY - Component

3 IMUS CITY - Component

4 ALFONSO 1st

5 CARMONA 1st

6 GEN. MARIANO ALVAREZ 1st

7 GENERAL TRIAS 1st

8 NAIC 1st

9 ROSARIO 1st

10 SILANG 1st

11 KAWIT 1st

12 TANZA 1st

13 INDANG 1st

14 TAGAYTAY CITY 2nd Component

15 MARAGONDON 3rd

16 NOVELETA 3rd

17 AMADEO 4th

18 CAVITE CITY 4th Component

19 MAGALLANES 4th

20 MENDEZ (MENDEZ-NUÑEZ) 4th

21 TERNATE 4th

22 TRECE MARTIRES CITY (Capital) 4th Component

23 GENERAL EMILIO AGUINALDO 5th

1 CABUYAO CITY - Component

2 CITY OF BIÑAN - Component

3 CITY OF CALAMBA 1st Component

4 SANTA CRUZ (Capital) 1st

5 CITY OF SANTA ROSA 1st Component

6 LOS BAÑOS 1st

7 SAN PABLO CITY 1st Component

8 SAN PEDRO 1st

9 BAY 2nd

10 CALAUAN 2nd

11 SINILOAN 2nd

12 NAGCARLAN 2nd

13 ALAMINOS 3rd

14 CAVINTI 3rd

15 KALAYAAN 3rd

16 LUMBAN 3rd

17 PAGSANJAN 3rd

18 PILA 3rd

19 LUISIANA 4th

20 MAGDALENA 4th

LA

GU

NA

4A

4A

CA

VIT

E

3

TA

RL

AC

of 29



REGION PROVINCE NO. MUNICIPALITY/CITY Income City 21 MAJAYJAY 4th

22 PAETE 4th

23 PANGIL 4th

24 SANTA MARIA 4th

25 LILIW 4th

26 VICTORIA 4th

27 FAMY 5th

28 MABITAC 5th

29 RIZAL 5th

1 BINANGONAN 1st

2 CAINTA 1st

3 CITY OF ANTIPOLO 1st Component

4 PILILLA 1st

5 TAYTAY 1st

6 ANGONO 1st

7 RODRIGUEZ (MONTALBAN) 1st

8 SAN MATEO 1st

9 TANAY 1st

10 MORONG 2nd

11 TERESA 2nd

12 CARDONA 3rd

13 JALA-JALA 4th

1 MANILA - Highly

2 CITY OF LAS PIÑAS 1st Highly

3 CITY OF MAKATI 1st Highly

4 CITY OF MUNTINLUPA 1st Highly

5 CITY OF PARAÑAQUE 1st Highly

6 PASAY CITY 1st Highly

7 TAGUIG CITY 1st Highly

8 PATEROS 1st

1 CITY OF MANDALUYONG 1st Highly

2 CITY OF MARIKINA 1st Highly

3 3. CITY OF PASIG 1st Highly

4 5. CITY OF SAN JUAN 1st Highly

5 4. QUEZON CITY Spe Highly

1 1. CALOOCAN CITY 1st Highly

2 2. CITY OF MALABON 1st Highly

3 4. CITY OF VALENZUELA 1st Highly

4 3. CITY OF NAVOTAS 2nd Highly

LA

GU

NA

4A

NCR

4T

H D

IST

RIC

T2N

D D

IST

RIC

T3R

D D

IST

4A

RIZ

AL

of 29



ANNEX B

Comprehensive, Comparative Analysis of the Different Waste-to-Energy (WTE)

Technologies for Solid Waste Processing, Treatment and Energy Generation

WTE technology evaluation consists of a comprehensive review of the technical,

environmental (including climate change), logistical, financial and economic, socio-

political, legal, regulatory, institutional, and capacity-building requirements. In addition,

the Study shall be conducted within the context of national development plans and goals.

Technology description includes, among others, the operating capacity of each system,

energy generation rate, recycling or compost production rate (where applicable), material

and energy flow analysis, and other conditions and requirements that dictate its feasibility

which include, but not limited to, the following:

Conventional Thermal Treatment Technologies, such as, Gasification, Plasma Arc,

and Pyrolysis;

Emerging Technologies, such as, Gasplasma, Thermal Cracking, Thermal Oxidation,

and Waste-to-Fuels; and

Non-Burn Technologies, such as, Anaerobic Digestion and Non-burn Pyrolysis.

Provision of information on the other available or emerging WTE technologies and

systems for the management of MSWs and their energy-generation potential.

Identification of conditions that will render WTE schemes appropriate to certain

LGUs/clusters, including, but not limited to, capitalization, space requirements, logistical

requirements, air and hazardous emissions monitoring systems and required operator

competencies as well as the provision of technical recommendations that will optimize the

use and application of WTE technologies.

of 29



ANNEX C

RATING TABLE FOR SHORTLISTING OF CONSULTING FIRMS

Conduct of the Feasibility Study (F/S) for the Appropriate Waste-to-Energy (WTE) Technology covering 178 Local Government Units (LGUs) in the Manila Bay Region

Name of Firm :

HURDLE RATE FOR SHORTLISTING = 70 points

RATING FACTORS POINTS/ WEIGHT

Remarks

I Qualification of Firm Subtotal 20

a. No. of years of relevant Firm's experience

- more than 20 years

- 11 to 20 years

- 10 years

- less than 10 years (disqualified)

II Project Manager Qualifications (1) 20

a. Work Experience in Waste-to-Energy

- more than 20 years

- 11 to 20 years

- 10 years


b. With 5 years VA / Options Analysis experience

c. Licensed Engineer with Degree on related field

- Ph.D.

- Master's

- Bachelor's

III Senior Specialists Qualifications (2) 20

a. Degree on related field

- Ph.D.

- Master's

- Bachelor's

b. Work Experience in WTE/SWM

- More than 15 years

- 5 to 15 years


c. With 5 years VA / Options Analysis experience

IV Other Specialists Qualifications (5) 20

a. Degree on related field

- Ph.D.

- Master's

- Bachelor's

b. Work Experience in related discipline

- More than 10 years

- 3 to 10 years


of 29



V Job Capacity 20

a. Ongoing Contracts of the Firm

- 0

- 1

- 2 -3

- more than 3

b. Ongoing Contracts of the Team Leader

- 0

- 1

- 2-3

- more than 3

TOTAL 100

of 29

Feasibility Study for the Appropriate

WTE Technology covering178 LGUs

in the Manila Bay Region

ANNEX D

Guidelines in the Preparation of Eligibility Requirements

The Eligibility Statement of the Consulting Firm interested to be considered for the services

contemplated shall fill up the enclosed form in six (6) copies and shall be submitted to the NEDA Bids

and Awards Committee (NBAC).

The numbers below correspond to the numbers contained in the form.

1. Type complete name of firm, year established, country of registry if foreign, and type of

organization whether individual, proprietorship, partnership, corporation or others.

2. Name of affiliate firms, their year established, countries of origin, and type of organization.

3. Type exact and complete home office, business address, telephone number and cable address.

For consulting firms of foreign registry, indicate if there is any branch office/s established in

the Philippines and where established.

4. If present firm is the successor to or outgrowth of one or more predecessor firms, type name/s

of former entity/ies and the year/s of their original establishment.

5. Present a brief narrative description of the firm.

6. Indicate clearly and accurately the names of the principals of the Consulting Firm and key

personnel. This must be accompanied by the curriculum vitae showing experience, professional

affiliations and language capability of the key personnel listed.

7. List not more than two (2) principals who may be contacted by this Office. Listed principals

must be empowered to speak for the firm on policy and contractual matters.

8. Indicate the number of employees by discipline. While some personnel may be qualified in

several disciplines, each person should be countered only once in accordance with his/her

primary functions.

a. Under this item, indicate the volume of gross consultancy fees per year for the last five

years. Gross fees received may be as Prime Consultant or in association or joint venture

with consulting firms.

b. Indicate bank references and bank address. It is a must that the latest balance sheet duly

signed by an independent Certified Public Accountant or accounting firm be submitted with

this form.

c. The chart listed under this item represents the ranges of professional Service Fee. The

indices should be indicated under item no. 10, last column.

9. Indicate appropriate types of services and fields of specialization the Consulting Firm is

technically and financially qualified to undertake.

10. This item represents the ongoing/committed consultancy projects of the Consulting Firm and

those handled in the last five years. First column represents the name of the project, the date the

project was started and how it was accomplished, i.e., as Prime Consultant or through joint

venture or in association with other Consulting Firms. If it was implemented in association with

other Consulting Firm, indicate name of Consulting Firm. Second column represents the

consulting services rendered, defined as clearly as possible. Third, column represents the Client

of 29




whom the services were rendered. Indicate the address of the Client. Last column represents the

level of fee received by the Consulting Firm as referred to under item 8c — INDEX FEE.

11. List of projects the firm has been engaged in consulting services.

NEW FIRMS (not reorganized or recently amalgamated but only established for less than two

(2) years reckoned from the date of preparation of this form) may accomplish this form and

questions on the form dealing with personnel or experience may be answered by citing

experience and capabilities of the principals and key staff of the firm based on performance and

responsibility while in the employ of others. In item 10, representative projects of key

personnel and principal offices for the last three (3) years plus consulting services rendered by

the New Firm may be indicated.

NOTE: Additional data, brochures, photos, etc. should not accompany this form unless specifically

requested.

CONSULTANT'S ELIGIBILITY

FORM

DATE

CONSULTANT Year

Established

Country Type of Organization

Indiv. Part. Corp. Other

1) NAME

2) AFFILIATED FIRMS

3) HOME OFFICE/BUSINESS ADDRESS / TEL. NOS. CABLE ADDRESS

4)FORMER CONSULTANT'S NAME & YEAR ESTABLISHED FIRM

OWNERSHIP

5) NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION OF FIRM (Use other sheet if necessary)

6) PARTNERS, DIRECTORS, OFFICERS, KEY PERSONNEL OF

FIRM

NAME AND TITLE DEGREES(S) YEARS

WITH FIRM

AGE

(ADD CURRICULUM VITAE

SHOWING EXPERIENCE,

PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATION AND

LANGUAGE CAPABILITY)

7) NAMES OF NOT MORE THAN TWO (2) PRINICPALS TO CONTACT

TITLE AND TELEPHONE NUMBER

8) NUMBER OF PERSONNEL IN PRESENT ORGANIZATION

DISCIPLINE NUMBER

PRINCIPAL

KEY TECHNICAL

a. Civil Engineers

b. Structural Engineers

c. Electrical Engineers

d. Mechanical Engineers

e. Architects

f. Economists

g. Others (Specify)

of 29




SUPPORT TECHNICAL

(Indicate as in above)

ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF

Indicate type, e.g. typist)

8a) ANNUAL VOLUME OF GROSS FEES

(LAST 5 YEARS)

8b) FINANCIAL RATING OR

BANK REFERENCE

8c) RANGES OF PROFESSIONAL FEES INDEX

1. Less than P100,000

2. P100,000 to P250,000

3. P250,000 to P500,000

4. P500,000 to PI million

5. PI million to P2 million

6. P2 million to P5 million

7. P5 million to PIO million

8. 1110 million or greater

9) FIELDS OF SPECIALIZATION AND TYPES OF SERVICES

FIELDS OF SPECIALIZATION TYPES OF SERVICES

ABCDE

I. Engineering

2. Architecture

3. Finance

4. Management

5. Agriculture

6. Law

7. Others (Please Specify)

A - Advisory and Review Services

B - Pre-Investment or Feasibility Studies

C - Design

D — Construction Supervision

E - Other Technical Services or Special Studies

10) PROJECTS HANDLED BY THE CONSULTANT FOR THE LAST FIVE YEARS

PROJECT NAME/YEAR SERVICE

RENDERED

CLIENT INDE

X FEE PRIME CONSULTANT/JOINT VENTURE

11) TYPICAL PROJECTS FOR WHICH CONSULTING SERVICES HAVE BEEN FURNISHED BY

THE CONSULTANT (REFERENCE SHEETS MAY BE SUBMITTED FOR AS MANY PROJECTS

AS DESIRED)

NAME OF OVERALL PROJECT __________________________________________

LOCATION OF OVERALL PROJECT ______________________________________

CONSULTANT'S LEVEL OF EFFORT ______________________________________

(CONSULTANT'S FEE)

OWNER'S NAME AND ADDRESS

of 29




YEAR SERVICES COMPLETED

(INDICATE IF ESTIMATED OR ACTUAL)

ASSOCIATED FIRMS

DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES FIRM

PROVIDED

LIST TYPES OF SERVICES FOR ASSOCIATED ASPECTS OF OVERALL

PROJECTS

of 29




ANNEX E

Breakdown of the Approved Budget for the Contract (ABC)

Remuneration Expenses PhP17,940,000.00

(1) Project Manager

(1) Senior SWM Specialist

(1) Senior WTE Specialist

(4) SWM/WTE Specialist

(1) Financial Specialist

(1) Economic Specialist

(1) IT Specialist

Other Specialists

Reimbursable Expenses PhP33,807,600.00

Workshops for the WACS

Transportation Costs

Project Office Space

Supplies, Materials, Equipment, Drawings, etc.

Field Allowance (including housing, per diem of specialists/other

staffs/Government Counterparts during fieldworks, etc.)

Conduct of WACS

DENR/NEDA Representative Expenses (i.e., meals, travel expense, lodging)

Communication Expenses

Total Reimbursable Expenses PhP51,747,600.00

Contingency (5%) PhP2,197,380.00

GRAND TOTAL PhP53,944,980.00

php400,000,000.00 national economic and … · 1 ra 9003, an act providing for an ecological solid...

Documents