photoacoustic imaging to detect tumor

23
PHOTOACOUSTIC IMAGING TO DETECT TUMOR HAIFENG WANG SUBHASHINI PAKALAPATI VU TRAN Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Massachusetts Lowell 1

Upload: vevay

Post on 25-Feb-2016

55 views

Category:

Documents


4 download

DESCRIPTION

PHOTOACOUSTIC IMAGING TO DETECT TUMOR. HAIFENG WANG SUBHASHINI PAKALAPATI VU TRAN Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Massachusetts Lowell. OUTLINE. Introduction Brief Principle of Photoacoustic (PA) Different Techniques of PAI - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: PHOTOACOUSTIC IMAGING TO DETECT TUMOR

PHOTOACOUSTIC IMAGING TO DETECT TUMOR

HAIFENG WANGSUBHASHINI PAKALAPATIVU TRAN

Department of Electrical and Computer EngineeringUniversity of Massachusetts Lowell

1

Page 2: PHOTOACOUSTIC IMAGING TO DETECT TUMOR

OUTLINE

Introduction Brief Principle of Photoacoustic (PA) Different Techniques of PAI Comparison of Various Imaging Techniques Advantages and Disadvantages Conclusion Reference

2

Page 3: PHOTOACOUSTIC IMAGING TO DETECT TUMOR

Brief

Conversion of photons to acoustic waves due to absorption and localized thermal excitation.

Pulses of light is absorbed, energy will be radiated as heat.

Heat causes detectable sound waves due to pressure variation.

3

Page 4: PHOTOACOUSTIC IMAGING TO DETECT TUMOR

3D photoacoustic imaging of melanoma in vivo.

4

The picture is from Optical Imaging Laboratory, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis

Page 5: PHOTOACOUSTIC IMAGING TO DETECT TUMOR

Infrasound Acoustic Ultrasound

20Hz 20KHz 2MHz 200MHz

Low bass notes Medical and DestructiveDiagnostic and

Nondestructive Testing (NDT)

Ultrasound applications:

Ultrasound in optical fibers

Introduction of Ultrasound

Page 6: PHOTOACOUSTIC IMAGING TO DETECT TUMOR

Principle of photoacoustic

Optical fiber

Energy absorption layer

Laser excitation

Acoustic signals

• The light energy is converted into thermal energy via energy absorption layer;

• The thermal energy converts into mechanical wave because of thermal expansion;

• An acoustic wave is generated.

Page 7: PHOTOACOUSTIC IMAGING TO DETECT TUMOR

Principle of photoacoustic by gold nanoparticle

Optical fiber

Energy absorption layer

GoldnanoparticleLaser pulse Sound pulse

Laser excitation

Acoustic signals

Page 8: PHOTOACOUSTIC IMAGING TO DETECT TUMOR

Experimental set up of photoacoustic molecular imaging

The pictureSeunghan Ha, Andrew Carson, Ashish Agarwal, Nicholas A. Kotov, and Kang Kim; Detection and monitoring of the multiple inflammatory responses by photoacoustic molecular imaging using selectively targeted gold nanorods

Page 9: PHOTOACOUSTIC IMAGING TO DETECT TUMOR

A typical PAT/TAT system

9

The picture is from OptoSonics, Inc and Fairway Medical Technologies, Inc.

Page 10: PHOTOACOUSTIC IMAGING TO DETECT TUMOR

Tumor Detection Using Endogenous Contrast

Xueding Wang, William W. Roberts, Paul L. Carson, David P. Wood and J. Brian Fowlkes, Photoacoustic tomography: a potential new tool for prostate cancer, 2010 :Vol. 1, No. 4 : Biomedical Optics Express 1117

Page 11: PHOTOACOUSTIC IMAGING TO DETECT TUMOR
Page 12: PHOTOACOUSTIC IMAGING TO DETECT TUMOR

Using Exogenous Contrast• 3-D photoacoustic imaging • Evans Blue acted as a contrast agent.• Deep lying blood vessels in real tissue

samples were imaged at depths of 5 mm and at 9 mm from the plane of detection.

• The sensitivity of the technique was proven by photoacoustic detection of single red blood cells upon a glass plate.

C.G.A Hoelen et.al,1998

Page 13: PHOTOACOUSTIC IMAGING TO DETECT TUMOR

PAImaging Using Gold Nano Particles

13

Qizhi Zhang et.al,2010

Page 14: PHOTOACOUSTIC IMAGING TO DETECT TUMOR

14Qizhi Zhang et.al.,2010

Page 15: PHOTOACOUSTIC IMAGING TO DETECT TUMOR

COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT IMAGING TECHNIQUES:

ULTRASOUND

Transducer emit ultrasound wave and get signals back from object. D= t.v

Scan volume to get image Pros & cons: No side effects but low resolution

15

Page 16: PHOTOACOUSTIC IMAGING TO DETECT TUMOR

COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY Use X-ray to collect data Detector collects the sum of

absorption factors in one direction Using the computing algorithms, the

absorption factor of each voxel will be calculated.

3D image will be constructed based on these factors.

Pros & cons: 3D, high resolution but increase the risk of cancer in those exposed

16

Page 17: PHOTOACOUSTIC IMAGING TO DETECT TUMOR

MRI A powerful magnetic field is used to

align the magnetization of Hydrogen atoms in the body

Radio frequency fields are used to alter the alignment of this magnetization

Nuclei to produce a rotating magnetic field detectable by the scanner

Pros and Cons: 3D, good contrast but make acoustic noise and may effect on some implants in patients

17

Page 18: PHOTOACOUSTIC IMAGING TO DETECT TUMOR

POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY

Positron-emitting radionuclide (tracer) is introduced into the body on a biologically active molecule

System detects pairs of gamma rays emitted indirectly by a tracer

Three-dimensional images of tracer concentration within the body are then constructed by computer analysis

18

Page 19: PHOTOACOUSTIC IMAGING TO DETECT TUMOR

Photoacoustic Imaging

PAI: Combine advantages of optical (high contrast) and ultrasound (great imaging depth and high resolution): high optical contrast images microscale resolution reasonable penetration depth

19

Page 20: PHOTOACOUSTIC IMAGING TO DETECT TUMOR

ADVANTAGES1. Ability to detect deeply situated

tumor and its vasculature2. Monitors angiogenesis3. High resolution4. Compatible to Ultra Sound5. High penetration depth6. Non-ionizing/Non-radioactivity7. Small size8. Easy to clean and maintenance9. No acoustic noise

1. Limited path length2. Temperature dependence3. Weak absorption at short

wavelengths

DISADVANTAGES

20

Page 21: PHOTOACOUSTIC IMAGING TO DETECT TUMOR

Conclusion• PAI has an edge over other imaging

modalities.• Though it is in its infancy and there have as

yet been no large clinical trials,many initial studies have demonstrated the possibilities for its application in the biomedical field.

• Clearly, we should expect to see many exciting clinical applications of PA technologies in the near future.

21

Page 22: PHOTOACOUSTIC IMAGING TO DETECT TUMOR

References1. Fass, L., Imaging and cancer: A review. Molecular oncology, 2008. 2(2): p. 115-152.2. Hall, E.J. and D.J. Brenner, Cancer risks from diagnostic radiology. Br J Radiol, 2008. 81(965): p. 362-378.3. De Santis, M., et al., Radiation effects on development. Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today, 2007. 81(3): p. 177-82.4. Brenner, D., Should we be concerned about the rapid increase in CT usage? Reviews on environmental health, 2010. 25(1): p. 63-68.5. Rapacholi, M.H., Essentials of Medical Ultrasound: A Practical Introduction to the Principles, Techniques and Biomedical Applications.

1982.6. Khan, T.S., et al., 11C-metomidate PET imaging of adrenocortical cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2003. 30(3): p. 403-10.7. Minn, H., et al., Imaging of Adrenal Incidentalomas with PET Using 11C-Metomidate and 18F-FDG. J Nucl Med, 2004. 45(6): p. 972-979.8. Young, H., et al., Measurement of clinical and subclinical tumour response using [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission

tomography: review and 1999 EORTC recommendations. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) PET Study Group. European journal of Cancer, 1999. 35(13): p. 1773-1782.

9. Amen, D.G. and B.D. Carmichael, High-Resolution Brain SPECT Imaging in ADHD. Annals of Clinical Psychiatry, 1997. 9(2): p. 81-86.10. Amen, D.G., C. Hanks, and J. Prunella, Predicting positive and negative treatment responses to stimulants with brain SPECT imaging. J

Psychoactive Drugs, 2008. 40(2): p. 131-8.11. Bonte, F.J., et al., Tc-99m HMPAO SPECT in the differential diagnosis of the dementias with histopathologic confirmation. Clin Nucl Med,

2006. 31(7): p. 376-8.12. Massoud, T.F. and S.S. Gambhir, Molecular imaging in living subjects: seeing fundamental biological processes in a new light. Genes Dev,

2003. 17(5): p. 545-80.13. Gibson, A.P., J.C. Hebden, and S.R. Arridge, Recent advances in diffuse optical imaging. Phys Med Biol, 2005. 50(4): p. R1-43.14. Kovar, J.L., et al., A systematic approach to the development of fluorescent contrast agents for optical imaging of mouse cancer models.

Anal Biochem, 2007. 367(1): p. 1-12.15. Frangioni, J.V., New Technologies for Human Cancer Imaging. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2008. 26(24): p. 4012-4021.16. Zhang, H.F., et al., Functional photoacoustic microscopy for high-resolution and noninvasive in vivo imaging. Nat Biotechnol, 2006. 24(7):

p. 848-51.17. Siphanto, R.I., et al., Serial noninvasive photoacoustic imaging of neovascularization in tumor angiogenesis. Opt Express, 2005. 13(1): p.

89-95.18. Emelianov, S.Y., et al., Synergy and Applications of Combined Ultrasound, Elasticity, and Photoacoustic Imaging. IEEE Ultrasonics

Symposium (2006), 2006: p. 405-415.19. Jose, J., et al., Imaging of tumor vasculature using Twente photoacoustic systems. Journal of Biophotonics, 2009. 2(12): p. 701-717.

22

Page 23: PHOTOACOUSTIC IMAGING TO DETECT TUMOR

THANK YOU

23