phosphorus index based management douglas beegle dept. of crop and soil sciences, penn state...
TRANSCRIPT
Phosphorus Index Based Management
Phosphorus Index Based Management
Douglas Beegle Dept. of Crop and Soil Sciences, Penn State University
[email protected]://panutrientmgmt.cas.psu.edu
SUMBER: aesl.ces.uga.edu/MidAtlantic/2010/P%20Index-%20Doug%20Beegle.ppt
Why do we need a P Index?Why not just agronomic recommendations?
N P2O5 K2O
Nitrogen BasedCorn/Dairy
Manure
Regional P Balance
¼
¾
Manure
Crops
Soil
AnimalsFeed
Eutrophication
Nutrient flows in
modern ag
P Index
?
Field P Balance
N P2O5 K2O
Phosphorus Based
Corn/Dairy Manure
P Index
SUMBER: aesl.ces.uga.edu/MidAtlantic/2010/P%20Index-%20Doug%20Beegle.ppt
Source Transport
Critical Source Area
Indeks P Critical Source Area Management
1. Overlap of Source & Transport Indicators2. Identify and manage the critical source
areas3. Evaluasi risiko lingkungan4. Target dan Sumberdaya
SUMBER: aesl.ces.uga.edu/MidAtlantic/2010/P%20Index-%20Doug%20Beegle.ppt
Mengelola Pencemaran Phosphorus
Subsurfaceflow
Tile flow
Leaching
Sources Transport
Erosion
Runoff
N P K
Hydrology Water Body
SUMBER: aesl.ces.uga.edu/MidAtlantic/2010/P%20Index-%20Doug%20Beegle.ppt
Mehlich-3 soil P, mg/kg
0 200 400 600 800
P loss,
lb P2O5/A
Uji Tanah vs. Kehilangan P
R2=0.80
0.8
0
1.6
2.4
Sharpley, USDA-ARS
Crop POptimum
P Threshold
No recent P inputs
SUMBER: aesl.ces.uga.edu/MidAtlantic/2010/P%20Index-%20Doug%20Beegle.ppt
Mehlich-3 soil P, mg/kg
0 200 400 600 800
P loss,
lb P2O5/A
75 kg P/ha TSP
112 kg P/ha swine slurry
150 kg P/ha poultry manure
75 kg P/ha TSP
112 kg P/ha swine slurry
150 kg P/ha poultry manure
Uji Tanah vs. Kehilangan P (dengan pupuk P)
Soil OnlyR2=0.80
For all data points R2=0.40
0.8
0
1.6
2.4
Sharpley, USDA-ARS
SUMBER: aesl.ces.uga.edu/MidAtlantic/2010/P%20Index-%20Doug%20Beegle.ppt
Indeks P• P Source Site Characteristics
– Environmental Soil Test P • Same soil test different interpretation
• Sampling Questions?
• P Saturation?
– P Fertilizer• Rate and Appl. Method
– Organic P• Rate and Appl. Method
• P Source Coefficient (PSC)– Direct availability of manure P to runoff
– Based on WEP in manure
SUMBER: aesl.ces.uga.edu/MidAtlantic/2010/P%20Index-%20Doug%20Beegle.ppt
Transport P oleh Erosi-Tanah
Erosion reduced 95%
1980 1985 1990 1995
Conventionaltill wheat
Convertedto no-till
Total P
mg/L
6
4
2
0
-
-
Sharpley, USDA-ARS
SUMBER: aesl.ces.uga.edu/MidAtlantic/2010/P%20Index-%20Doug%20Beegle.ppt
Zone Interaksi dengan Runoff
· Location of applied P· Interaction with
runoff• P on surface• Soil test at surface• High P Saturation at
surfacePsat = P / Al + Fe
Oxalate extr. or Mehlich 3 extr. 100
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
0
20
40
60
80
Mehlich 1 P (mg/kg)
Dep
th (
cm)
Data from Mozaffari and Sims, 1994
Zone of interaction with runoff
Plow depth
SUMBER: aesl.ces.uga.edu/MidAtlantic/2010/P%20Index-%20Doug%20Beegle.ppt
Transpor P-larut dalam Runoff
Conventionaltill wheat
1980 1985 19951990
Alg
al-
availa
ble
P, m
g/L
0.5
1.0
0
Convertedto no-till
Sharpley, USDA-ARS
SUMBER: aesl.ces.uga.edu/MidAtlantic/2010/P%20Index-%20Doug%20Beegle.ppt
Kehilangan P Larut oleh aliran bawah permukaan
Kehilangan P ini sangat tergantung pada sifat-sifat tanah:– Hidrologi
• Piston flow• Macro pores
– Tekstur tanah– Kimia tanah
(Fe, Al, Ca)– P loading/saturation– Drainage Buatan.
Data from: Bolton et al., 1970
Culley and Bolton, 1983
SUMBER: aesl.ces.uga.edu/MidAtlantic/2010/P%20Index-%20Doug%20Beegle.ppt
Kehilangan P merupakan proses “Landscape” yg kompleks
Subsurfaceflow
Tile flow
Leaching
Sources Transport
Erosion
Runoff
N P K
Hydrology Water Body
SUMBER: aesl.ces.uga.edu/MidAtlantic/2010/P%20Index-%20Doug%20Beegle.ppt
Indeks P = Phosphorus Index
P Transport Site Characteristics1. Erosi Tanah2. Kelas Runoff3. Potential Pencucian
1. Drainage bawah-permukaan
4. Contributing Distance5. Modified Connectivity
SUMBER: aesl.ces.uga.edu/MidAtlantic/2010/P%20Index-%20Doug%20Beegle.ppt
PA
Phosphorus
Index
v 2.0
PART B: SOURCE FACTORS Field ID
SOIL TEST Mehlich-3 Soil Test P (ppm P)
Soil Test Rating = 0.20* Mehlich-3 Soil Test P (ppm P)
FERTILIZER P RATE
Fertilizer P (lb P2O5/acre)
FERTILIZER APPLICATION
METHOD
0.2 Placed or injected 2"
or more deep
0.4 Incorporated <1 week following application
0.6 Incorporated > 1 week or not incorporated following
application in April - October
0.8 Incorporated >1 week
or not incorporated following application
in Nov. - March
1.0 Surface applied to
frozen or snow covered soil
Fertilizer Rating = Fertilizer Rate x Fertilizer Application Method
MANURE P RATE
Manure P (lb P2O5/acre)
MANURE APPLICATION
METHOD
0.2 Placed or injected 2"
or more deep
0.4 Incorporated <1 week following application
0.6 Incorporated > 1 week or not incorporated following
application in April - October
0.8 Incorporated >1 week
or not incorporated following application
in Nov. - March
1.0 Surface applied to
frozen or snow covered soil
P Source Coefficient
Refer to: Test results for P Source Coefficient OR Book values from P Index Fact Sheet Table 1
Manure Rating = Manure Rate x Manure Application Method x Manure P Availability
Source Factor Sum
PART B: TRANSPORT FACTORS Field ID
EROSION Soil Loss (ton/A/yr)
RUNOFF POTENTIAL
0 Excessively
2 Somewhat Excessively
4 Well/Moderately Well
6 Somewhat Poorly
8 Poorly/Very Poorly
SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE
0 None
1 Random
2* Patterened
CONTRIBUTING DISTANCE
0 > 500 ft.
2 350 to 500 ft.
4 200 to 349 ft.
6 100 to 199 ft. OR
<100 ft. with 35 ft. buffer
9‡ < 100 ft.
Transport Sum = Erosion+ Runoff Potential + Subsurface Drainage + Contributing Distance
MODIFIED CONNECTIVITY
0.85 50 ft. Riparian Buffer APPLIES TO DIST
< 100 FT
1.0 Grassed Waterway or
None
1.1 Direct Connection APPLIES TO DIST
> 100 FT
Transport Sum x Modified Connectivity/24
P Index Value = 2 x Source x Transport
Field ID
Is the CMU in a Special Protection Watershed?
Is there a significant farm management change as defined by Act 38? If the answer is yes to any of these
Is the Soil Test Mehlich-3 P greater than 200 ppm P? questions Part B must be used.
Is the contributing distance from this CMU to water less than 150 ft.?
* OR rapid permeability soil near a stream ‡ "9" factor does not apply to fields with a 35 ft. buffer receiving manure.
PART A: SCREENING TOOL
SUMBER: aesl.ces.uga.edu/MidAtlantic/2010/P%20Index-%20Doug%20Beegle.ppt
0.4
0
0.8
1.2
P loss,
kg/ha
P index value for the site
0 50 100 150 200
75 kg P/ha TSP
112 kg P/ha swine slurry
150 kg P/ha poultry manure
75 kg P/ha TSP
112 kg P/ha swine slurry
150 kg P/ha poultry manure
Indeks P mendeskripsikan Potensial kehilangan P
Very highHighMediumLow
Sharpley, USDA-ARS
R2=0.79
SUMBER: aesl.ces.uga.edu/MidAtlantic/2010/P%20Index-%20Doug%20Beegle.ppt
Indeks P = Phosphorus Index1. Low P Index
1. N Based Management
2. Medium P Index1. N Based Management
3. High P Index*1. P Based: Crop removal
4. Very High P Index*1. No P: Manure or Fertilizer
High and Very High*– Modify Management
based on P• No or reduced manure
• Change time or method of application
• Conservation practices
• Buffers
• Etc.
SUMBER: aesl.ces.uga.edu/MidAtlantic/2010/P%20Index-%20Doug%20Beegle.ppt
Rencana Manajemen Hara P
• Develop N based plan– Usually means excess P will be
applied
• Use P Index to evaluate the N based plan – Is the risk of P loss acceptable
• Acceptable risk– Apply @ N rate, excess P
• Unacceptable Risk– Modify N based plan, where
necessary, to address P loss risk
N P2O5 K2O
Nitrogen BasedCorn/Dairy
Manure
N P2O5 K2O
Phosphorus Based
Corn/Dairy Manure
or
or
NONESUMBER: aesl.ces.uga.edu/MidAtlantic/2010/P%20Index-%20Doug%20Beegle.ppt
Aplikasi Indeks P
• Eventually, all fields will have a high P index
• P Index is not the solution– Tool to buy time to solve problem– Minimizes negative impact of P while we
come up with a sustainable solution– We need to get the system into better balance
SUMBER: aesl.ces.uga.edu/MidAtlantic/2010/P%20Index-%20Doug%20Beegle.ppt
NRCS/EPA P Index Issues
• Proposed change in NRCS 590 Std.– P soil test only – No more P Index
• Easy to regulate • Very strict limits• Not supported by the science - Source/Transport• Unrealistic for animal agriculture to comply with in
short term• Better soil P balance is a good long term goal
– Withdrawn, under further review
SUMBER: aesl.ces.uga.edu/MidAtlantic/2010/P%20Index-%20Doug%20Beegle.ppt